Date post: | 25-Jan-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 4 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 2 3 8 7 – 2 3 9 6
0043-1354/$ - see frodoi:10.1016/j.watres
�Corresponding aE-mail address: rg
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/watres
Quantitation of hepatitis A virus and enterovirus levels inthe lagoon canals and Lido beach of Venice, Italy, usingreal-time RT-PCR
Michael A. Rosea, Arun K. Dharb, Hilary A. Brooksa,Fulvio Zecchinic, Richard M. Gersberga,�
aGraduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USAbDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USAcLaboratorio di Analisi di Microbiologia Ambientale (LAMA), Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale ‘‘La Chimica per l’Ambiente’’ (INCA),
Via delle Industrie, 21/8, I-30175 Marghera, Venezia, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 September 2005
Received in revised form
24 March 2006
Accepted 29 March 2006
Available online 5 June 2006
Keywords:
Hepatitis a virus
Enteroviruses
Real-time RT-PCR
Risk assessment
Venice Lagoon
nt matter & 2006 Elsevie.2006.03.030
uthor. Tel.: +1 619 594 [email protected] (R
A B S T R A C T
In order to assess the microbial water quality of the lagoon canals of Venice, Italy and
nearby beach on Lido island, a study was conducted using real-time RT-PCR to enumerate
levels of hepatitis A virus (HAV) and enteroviruses in these marine waters over a 3-year
period from 2003 to 2005. A total of 17 sites (9 lagoon canal and 8 beach sites) were assayed.
For the canals of the Venice Lagoon, 78% were positive for both HAV and enteroviruses, with
levels ranging from 75 to 730 and 3 to 1614 genome copies/L, respectively. At Lido beach,
HAV was never detected, but enteroviruses were detected in all Lido beach samples at levels
ranging from 2 to 71 genome copies/L. There was a statistically significant correlation
between thermotolerant coliform densities and HAV levels (p ¼ 0.0002), but the relationship
between thermotolerant coliform densities and enterovirus levels was not significant
(p40.05). Despite the fact that enteroviruses were detected at low levels in the surfzone at
Lido beach, the risk for enteroviral infection (calculated using the beta-Poisson model) for
recreational exposure from swimming, was in the range of 1.9� 10�3–6.1� 10�2, yielding a
disease risk at or below the level (5% for gastroenteritis) deemed acceptable by European
Guide standards.
& 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The unique location of the city of Venice, Italy, built on a
number of islands in the middle of the Venice Lagoon, has
rendered it impossible to construct a sewage treatment
infrastructure for the city and surrounding islands (Pavoni
et al., 1990). The lagoon receives the untreated sewage from
Venice with an organic and pathogen loading equivalent to
more than 400,000 persons during the tourist season (Orlob
et al., 1991). Although actual bathing is prohibited in the
r Ltd. All rights reserved.
5; fax: +1 619 594 6112..M. Gersberg).
lagoon itself, recreational beaches exist on the littoral strip of
the Adriatic sea (e.g. Lido beach about 3 km west of the
northern Lagoon opening) which may be adversely impacted
by contaminated lagoon waters flowing out on the outgoing
tide. Additionally, Venice Lagoon is unusual insofar as there is
potential to impact human health through combined expo-
sure routes, some of which are not typical (Johnston et al.,
1993). For example, transport in Venice is predominantly by
boat. Disturbance of the contaminated water by motorized
vessels may create aerosols which may pose an inhalation
ARTICLE IN PRESS
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 4 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 2 3 8 7 – 2 3 9 62388
health hazard (Blanchard, 1989). Moreover, due to sea-level
rise combined with soil subsidence, flooding events have
become more frequent, occurring some 50 times a year in the
past decade (Bernstein and Cecconi, 1996). Such floods which
inundate streets and businesses increase the number of
waterborne disease exposure scenarios. A project with an
estimated cost of 4.5 billion US $ has recently begun to
construct movable tidal barriers to stop flooding of the city of
Venice (the MOSE Project). However, a number of environ-
mental concerns about this barrier project remain, particu-
larly that the operation of these barriers could decrease the
tidal flushing of the Lagoon and exacerbate an already serious
sewage pollution problem.
There is currently a lack of microbiological and epidemio-
logical studies that provide an assessment of the risk of
human disease associated with sewage disposal into the
Venice Lagoon (Aimo et al., 1999). Vazzoler and Stradella
(1999) detected enteroviruses (by tissue culture techniques) in
the canals of the city of Venice, but did not present
quantitative results for virus levels that could be used in a
risk assessment for bathing at Lido beaches or for other
scenarios involving exposure to waters of the Venice Lagoon.
The present study determined levels of both hepatitis A virus
(HAV) and enteroviruses in the lagoon canals of Venice and
the surfzone at nearby Lido beach by real-time RT-PCR, in
order to better assess human disease risk from recreational
exposure to these marine waters.
2. Methods
2.1. Sampling sites
A total of 17 water samples (Fig. 1 and Table 3) were collected,
including seven samples from the Grand canal (at Rialto
bridge), one sample from each of two interior canals, the Rio
di San Marcuola and the Rio di Fuseri, and eight samples from
a recreation beach at Lido (near Via Santa Maria Elisabetta
(SME)), on the littoral strip of the Adriatic Sea beach about
3 km west of the northern Lagoon opening (Fig. 1 and Table 3).
Fig. 1 – (A) Map of Venice Lagoon showing location of Lido beach
sampling sites.
Samples ranged from 2 to 12 L and were collected over three
consecutive years in the summers of 2003, 2004, and 2005
(Table 3).
2.2. Virus concentration
Each sample was processed within 1–2 h of collection follow-
ing a published protocol by Katayama et al. (2002). Seawater
samples were filtered at a constant rate via a vacuum pump
through a series of Whatman filters (of 11 and 2.5 mm pore
size) to reduce particulate matter. Although it is well under-
stood that viruses can adsorb to particles in the environment,
removal of particulates is necessary for PCR assays. Samples
were then applied to a type HA 0.45-mm negatively charged
membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The negatively
charged filter was washed with 200 mL of 0.5 mM H2SO4 to
remove cations, and the virus was eluted from the filter with
10 mL of 1 mM NaOH, into a tube containing 0.1 mL of 50 mM
H2SO4 and 0.1 mL of 100�TE buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,
MO, USA). The filtrate was then concentrated to 450mL volume
by centrifuging the samples in a Centriprep Concentrator
(YM-30, Millipore) at 1500g for 15, 10, and 5 min. Total RNA
was extracted from the 450mL filtrate using TRI ReagentTM
(Molecular Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) and the
RNA pellet was dissolved in 40mL of TE buffer (pH 8.0).
2.3. Quantitation of HAV by SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR
Procedures for cDNA synthesis and SYBR Green real-time RT-
PCR were performed as described by Brooks et al. (2005),
except a BioRad iCycler real-time thermocycler was used
instead of the Applied Biosystems GeneAmp 5700 Sequence
Detection System for real-time RT-PCR. First strand cDNA
(40mL) was synthesized from 19.5mL of RNA using random
hexamers. Sample cDNAs were diluted 1:10 and 1:100 with
DNase, RNase-free water containing sonicated herring sperm
DNA (5 ng/mL) as carrier DNA (Leutenegger et al., 1999). The
SYBR Green RT-PCR amplification was carried out in a 25mL
reaction volume that contained 7.1mL of 2� SYBR Green
sampling site. (B) Map of Venice canals showing location of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 1 – List of primers and probe used for HAV and enterovirus assays by conventional and real-time RT-PCR
RT-PCR Primer name Primer sequence (50–30) (%) GC Ampliconsize (bp)
References
Conventional
HAV HEPA1 Forward: GTT TTG CTC CTC TTT
ATC ATG CTA TG
39 247 Brooks et al.
(2005)
HEPA2 Reverse: GGA AAT GTC TCA GGT
ACT TTC TTT G
40
Real-time
HAV HAV1FWD Forward: TAC AGA GCA GAA TGT
TCC TGA TCC
46 76 Brooks et al.
(2005)
HAV3RVS Reverse: TCC CCT ATT GGC TTT
CCC TT
50
Enterovirus EV1FWD Forward: GGC CCC TGA ATG CGG
CTA AT
40 151 MGB AlertTM
Real-Time
PCRKit
(Xanogen)
EV1RVS Reverse: CAA TTG TCA CCA TAA
GCA GCC A
55
Probe MGB-EDQ-CTT TGG GTG TCC
GTG T-Q14-FAMa
44
a MGB ¼minor groove binder, EDQ ¼ eclipse dark quencher, FAM ¼ 6-carboxy fluorescein.
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 40 (2006) 2387– 2396 2389
Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 300 nM
each of the forward and reverse primers (Table 1), and 1 mL of
undiluted stock or diluted cDNA. Each sample had three
replicates to ensure the reproducibility of results. The thermal
profile for SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR was 95 1C for 10 min,
followed by 40 cycles of 95 1C for 10 s and 60 1C for 1 min.
2.4. Quantitation of enterovirus by molecular beacon real-time RT-PCR
Real-time PCR was accomplished using a One Step RT-PCR Kit
(Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and an MGB AlertTM Enterovirus
Real-Time PCR Kit (Nanogen, San Diego, CA, USA). The
enterovirus kit contained a 20� primer mix as well as a
20� MGB Eclipse Probe (Table 1) directed toward the 50
untranscribed region (UTR) of enteroviruses (coxsackie A and
B, echoviruses, polioviruses, and enteroviruses 68-71). The
RNA samples were diluted 1:10 and 1:100 with DNase, RNase-
free water containing sonicated herring sperm DNA (5 ng/mL)
as carrier DNA (Leutenegger et al., 1999). Each 50mL reaction
mixture contained 17mL of RNAse-free water, 10mL of 5�
Buffer, 10mL of 5� Q-Solution, 2.0 mL of dNTP Mix, 2.0 mL of
Enzyme Mix (all components of the Qiagen kit), 2.5mL of 20�
forward/reverse primer mix (Table 1), 2.5 mL of 20� MGB
Eclipse Probe (Table 1), and 4.0 mL of undiluted or diluted
template RNA.
Samples were run in duplicate on a BioRad iCycler real-time
PCR system. The real-time PCR conditions were as follows:
reverse transcription for 30 min at 50 1C, polymerase activa-
tion for 15 min at 95 1C, 50 cycles of denaturation for 10 s at
95 1C followed by annealing/detection for 30 s at 56 1C and
extension for 30 s at 76 1C, and a final extension step for
10 min at 76 1C.
2.5. Cloning and sequencing of HAV and enteroviruscDNA
Samples found positive for HAV and enterovirus by real-time
RT-PCR were cloned and sequenced. A 247 bp HAV cDNA was
amplified by conventional RT-PCR following a published proto-
col (Brooks et al., 2005). The primers for HAV amplification are
given in Table 1. Amplified cDNAs were separated by electro-
phoresis in a 2% agarose gel and eluted from the gel using a
Qiagen gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). In
order to clone the enterovirus cDNA, real-time RT-PCR ampli-
fied cDNAs were run in a 2% agarose gel, and gel-purified using
a Qiagen QIAquick gel extraction kit. The enterovirus and HAV
gel-purified cDNAs were cloned into a TOPO cloning vector
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Plasmid DNA was isolated from
recombinant clones and three to five clones were sequenced for
each sample using the vector-derived T7 primer.
2.6. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
Nucleotide sequences of HAV and enterovirus clones were
BLAST searched and identified based on similarity to Gen-
Bank database entries. Multiple alignments and phylogenetic
analyses were performed using MEGA version 3.0 by Kumar et
al. (2004). Kimura’s two-parameter distance was calculated
using transitions and transversions and a neighbor-joining
tree was built. The confidence of reconstructed clusters was
tested by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates.
2.7. Generation of HAV and enterovirus standard curvesby real-time RT-PCR
An HAV standard curve was generated using plasmid DNA
(8�107 copies/mL) with inserted cDNA from HAV strain HM
ARTICLE IN PRESS
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 4 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 2 3 8 7 – 2 3 9 62390
175 (VR-2089; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Serial dilutions
(from 8 to 8�104 copies/mL) were prepared in TE buffer
(Sigma-Aldrich). Plasmid containing enterovirus cDNA
(1�107 copies/mL) was obtained from Nanogen and a dilution
series (101–104 copies/mL) was prepared in TE buffer. Real-time
RT-PCR was performed in triplicate for each dilution of HAV
and enterovirus plasmids. Standard curves were created by
plotting the log of the number of HAV and enterovirus
genome copies versus their corresponding CT values and
creating a best-fit line through these points (Fig. 2). The cycle
threshold (CT) is defined as the PCR cycle at which an increase
in the fluorescence above the baseline signal is first detected.
The CT value is inversely related to the genome copy number.
Using the standard curves, HAV and enterovirus levels in the
canal and beach samples were calculated with the following
equations. Concentrations were calculated assuming that no
viral genomes were lost during the synthesis of cDNA
(Haramoto et al., 2005; Deffernez et al., 2004; Mohamed et
al., 2004),
fHAV genome copies=Lg
¼fð1� 10½ðCT�36:8Þ=�3:6�
Þðdilution factorÞð40Þð40=19:5ÞgfLiters of seawaterg
, ð1Þ
fEnterovirus genome copies=Lg
¼fð1� 10½ðCT�38:2Þ=�3:4�
Þðdilution factorÞð10ÞgfLiters of seawaterg
. ð2Þ
Fig. 2 – Standard curves of the real-time RT-PCR assays: (A) detec
8�103 (m), 8�102 (’), 8�101 (.), 8�100 (E) genome copies. (B)
at 104 (m), 103 (’), 102 (.), 101 (E) genome copies. HAV (C) and en
CT value versus the log of the number of viral genome copies. E
measurements.
2.8. Calculation of HAV and enterovirus recoveryefficiencies
Two 1 L seawater samples were seeded with known titers of
virus, one with poliovirus 2 (VR-301, W-2 strain; ATCC,
Manassas, VA, USA) and the other with HAV (VR-2089, Strain
HM 175, clone 1; ATCC) prior to filtration (Table 2). The same
amount of each virus was also spiked directly into a paired
concentrated seawater sample, following filtration, but before
RNA extraction. Real-time PCR was performed and copy
numbers were determined using the standard curves (Table
2). The recovery assay was performed twice for each virus and
the HAV and enterovirus recoveries were calculated by
dividing the number of virus genome copies in the filtered
samples by the number of copies in the unfiltered samples
(Table 2).
2.9. Detection of thermotolerant coliforms in Venice canaland Lido beach samples
To determine the thermotolerant coliform levels, 100 mL
water samples were collected and processed within 2 h of
collection. The membrane filter procedure (MF) was used to
enumerate thermotolerant coliform concentrations (Ameri-
can Public Health Association (APHA), 1992). Up to three 10-
fold serial dilutions of each water sample were applied to
cellulose acetate filters and coliforms were grown on M-FC
media for 24 h at 44.5 1C. Thermotolerant coliform colonies
tion of serial dilutions of HAV inserted plasmid at 8�104 (K),
Detection of serial dilutions of enterovirus inserted plasmid
terovirus (D) standard curves were generated by plotting the
rror bars indicate the standard error of triplicate
ARTICLE IN PRESS
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 40 (2006) 2387– 2396 2391
were counted and densities then calculated without con-
firmation. The detection limit for this method is 1 CFP/100 mL.
3. Results
3.1. Recovery of spiked HAV and poliovirus from seawater
In order to determine the efficiency of our virus extraction
and concentration protocol, seawater samples were seeded
with known amounts of HAV or poliovirus on two occasions
and virus levels were quantified using the real-time standard
curves (Fig. 2). The mean percent recovery was 12% for HAV
and 71% for poliovirus (Table 2).
3.2. Detection and quantitation of HAV and enteroviruslevels in Venice canal and Lido beach samples
Real-time RT-PCR was performed to detect and quantitate
levels of HAV and enterovirus in 17 samples from the Venice
Table 2 – Recovery efficiencies of HAV and poliovirus 2(seeded into 1 liter of natural seawater) by negativelycharged membrane followed by centrifugal ultrafiltration
Virus Spikedvirus
(genomes)
Recoveredvirus
(genomes)
Meanrecovery
(%)
HAV 12,568–32,271 1760–3240 12
poliovirus 2 591–775 451–516 71
Table 3 – Levels of HAV and enterovirus as determined by realdensities, in Venice Lagoon canals and the beach at Lido
SampleID
Location Date Samplesize (L) err
GC1 Grand canal (Rialto) 5/12/2003 3.0
GC2 Grand canal (Rialto) 5/13/2003 3.0
GC3 Grand canal (Rialto) 5/14/2003 3.0
GC4 Grand canal (Rialto) 5/15/2003 3.0
GC5 Grand canal (Rialto) 5/25/2004 4.0
GC6 Grand canal (Rialto) 5/27/2004 4.0
GC7 Grand canal (Rialto) 5/31/2004 2.0
IC1 Interior canal
(Marcuola)
5/27/2004 2.0
IC2 Interior canal
(Fuseri)
6/1/2004 2.0
LI Lido beach 5/26/2004 8.0
L2 Lido beach 5/31/2004 8.0
L3 Lido beach 6/1/2004 4.0
L4 Lido beach 5/24/2005 11.5
L5 Lido beach 5/25/2005 10.5
L6 Lido beach 5/26/2005 9.0
L7 Lido beach 5/27/2005 7.5
L8 Lido beach 5/30/2005 6.0
a ND ¼ Non-detectable.
Lagoon canals and Lido beach (Table 3). Samples that were
positive for either virus using real-time RT-PCR, were further
confirmed by sequencing and were then quantitated using
the standard curves (Fig. 2). Concentrations were calculated
assuming that no viral genomes were lost during the
synthesis of cDNA (Haramoto et al., 2005; Deffernez et al.,
2004; Mohamed et al., 2004), For each sample, the value from
the dilution which exhibited the highest number of
genome copies (i.e. showed the least inhibition) was used in
Table 3.
HAV was successfully detected in five of seven Grand canal
samples, and in both interior canal samples, at levels
(uncorrected for recovery efficiency) ranging from 75 to
730 genome copies/L, but was never detected in samples from
the beach at Lido (Table 3). Enterovirus was also successfully
detected in five of seven Grand canal samples, and in both of
the interior canal samples. However, unlike HAV, enterovirus
was also detected in all eight Lido beach water samples (Table
3). Enterovirus levels (uncorrected for recovery efficiency)
ranged from 3 to 1614 genome copies/L in the Venice Lagoon
canal samples and from 2 to 71 genome copies/L in the
seawater samples from Lido beach (Table 3).
The lowest viral concentrations we detected in our sea-
water samples via real-time RT-PCR and confirmed by
sequencing were 1.9 genome copies of HAV and 1.2 genome
copies of enterovirus per PCR reaction. Due to differences in
the volumes of water collected and the amounts of RNA used
in the PCR reactions, these numbers correspond to lowest
detection limits of 13.6–77.9 genomes/L for HAV and
1.2–7.0 genomes/L for enterovirus.
-time RT-PCR, as well as thermotolerant coliform bacterial
Thermotolant coliforms
(CFP/L)
HAVconcentration(genomes/L)
Enterovirusconcentration(genomes/L)
40,000 NDa 3
30,000 75 ND
8000 270 4
27,000 ND ND
5000 128 1614
87,220 94 234
91,670 108 35
540,000 730 164
9110 128 51
7 ND 71
60 ND 19
ND ND 15
155 ND 2
26 ND 2
7 ND 2
24 ND 12
13 ND 3
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 4 – Enteroviral types and the designations used to create the neighbor-joining tree in Fig. 3
Viral type Designation Genbank accession number
Human echovirus 13 isolate BE00-51 50 UTR, partial sequence Echovirusl3 AF521464
Human enterovirus 90 genomic RNA, complete genome Enterovirus90 AB192877
Human enterovirus B strain EV30_18733_02 50 untranslated region EnterovirusB AY271469
Human poliovirus 2 genomic RNA, complete sequence Poliovirus2 POL2CG1
Human echovirus 11 strain Pz 87 50 non-translated region, partial sequence Echovirusll AF447476
Human poliovirus 1 isolate CHN-Jiangxi 89-1, complete genome Poliovirusl AF111984
Coxsackievirus A16 G-10, complete genome CoxsackievirusA16 CAU05876
Fig. 3 – A neighbor-joining tree derived from an alignment of
151 base pairs of the 50 UTR from enteroviral standards and
our specimens from Venice, Italy. Kimura’s two-parameter
distance was calculated using transitions and transversions
and the confidence of reconstructed clusters was tested by
bootstrapping with 1000 replicates.
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 4 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 2 3 8 7 – 2 3 9 62392
3.3. Cloning and sequencing of HAV and enteroviruscDNA from Venice Lagoon and Lido beach water samples
Successful HAV amplification was obtained for 7 out of 17
samples. Multiple alignments of the HAV sequences showed
100% similarity among the isolates. A BLAST (Altschul et al.,
1997) search showed 100% similarity with the VP1–VP3 gene
of HAV strains (accession #AY441443). Of the 17 samples, 15
provided successful enterovirus amplification by real-time
RT-PCR. The length of the amplicon was 151 bases. Three to
five clones were sequenced for each sample with a total of 60
clones. A BLAST search using the 151 nucleotide sequence
showed that all the clones had a similarity to the 50-
untranslated region (UTR) of enteroviruses in the database
entries. Seven types of enteroviruses were identified among
the clones sequenced (Table 4). A neighbor-joining tree
constructed from an alignment of the 151 bases nucleotide
sequence of 50-UTR revealed two major clusters (Fig. 3). The
larger clade contained poliovirus 1 and 2 and enterovirus 90
while the smaller clade contained echovirus 11 and 13,
enterovirus B, and coxsackievirus A16 (Fig. 3). The large
cluster could be further divided into two groups with one
group comprising poliovirus 2 only and the other group
containing enterovirus 90 and poliovirus 1. The most
prevalent enterovirus was poliovirus 2 which was isolated
from 11 out of 15 samples. Two samples were positive for
enterovirus 90 and three were positive for poliovirus 1.
3.4. Concentrations of thermotolerant coliforms in VeniceLagoon and beach samples and their relationship to levels ofHAV and enterovirus
Thermotolerant coliform levels ranged from 5000 to
540,000 CFP/L (colony forming particles per liter) in the Venice
canals and from o1 to 155 CFP/L at Lido beach (Table 3). There
was a statistically significant correlation (R2¼ 0.62, p ¼ 0.0002)
between thermotolerant coliform densities and HAV levels, but
the relationship between thermotolerant coliforms and enter-
ovirus was not significant (R2¼ 0.08, p ¼ 0.2572) (Fig. 4).
4. Discussion
Indicators for assessing water quality have been a subject of
some controversy for over 50 years. Waterborne marine
illnesses are most often associated with viruses rather than
bacteria (Griffin et al., 2003). However, current bathing water
quality requirements in European Union countries are based
on levels of fecal bacteria indicators (thermotolerant coli-
forms) rather than virus. Thermotolerant coliform indicators
have been shown to die off more quickly in seawater than
many viruses, and therefore may not be found in contami-
nated water where viruses can still persist (Fattal et al., 1983).
Therefore, in order to assess the human health risk asso-
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 4 – Regression analysis of thermotolerant coliform densities as a function of (A) HAV and (B) enterovirus concentrations in
seawater, collected from the Venice Lagoon canals and Lido beach in Venice, Italy. Non-detectable (ND) levels of bacteria and
virus were assigned the value of one-half of the limit of detection.
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 40 (2006) 2387– 2396 2393
ciated with exposure to sewage-contaminated waters of the
Venice Lagoon, we used real time RT-PCR to measure levels of
HAV and enteroviruses directly, and to better define the
relationship between these viruses and thermotolerant coli-
forms.
To date, there have been few studies performed to evaluate
the viral water quality of beaches and coastal waters along
the Adriatic coastline of Italy. Muscillo et al. (1999) used RT-
PCR to detect poliovirus 3 in estuarine waters of the Foglia
River and along the beaches of Pesaro along the Adriatic coast
of Italy. Another study by a different group of researchers in
the same area of the Adriatic coast, detected the presence of
enterovirus by cell culture in 32% of 144 samples (Pianetti et
al., 2000). These authors concluded that viral pollution
originating from regional public and resort wastewater
disposal systems could negatively impact regional beach
water quality. In another survey of water quality in the
Adriatic Sea near Fano, Italy, Muscillo et al. (2001) used RT-PCR
to identify reoviruses in 30% of 72 seawater samples; however,
no enteroviruses were detected. The fact that Muscillo et al.
(2001) did not detect enteroviruses in their study while we did
in most of our samples may have been due to better quality
water samples in their study or to the generally superior
detection sensitivity of real-time RT-PCR versus conventional
RT-PCR.
Although the development of real-time RT-PCR methods
now makes it possible to quantitate levels of human viruses
in other impacted coastal waters like the Venice Lagoon, such
molecular detection techniques cannot distinguish between
infectious and non-infectious particles. On the other hand,
since HAV detection and quantification by conventional cell
culture assay is often difficult and time-consuming, there is
little data that has been published to date on HAV levels in
impacted marine waters. Moreover, despite its limitations in
recognizing infectivity, real-time RT-PCR can still be valuable
as an indicator of recent viral contamination (Gantzer et al.,
1999). Using real-time PCR, Brooks et al. (2005) detected HAV
in all eight samples taken during rain events from either the
mouth of the Tijuana River (near the US–Mexico border) or the
nearby surfzone at Imperial Beach, CA, at levels ranging from
90 to 3523 and 347 to 2656 copies/L, respectively. These
relatively high levels of HAV measured during wet weather
were attributed to the inadequate sewage collection infra-
structure in the region of Tijuana, Mexico.
In the present study, both HAV and enteroviruses were
detected in 78% of the canal samples analyzed, with levels
(uncorrected for recovery efficiency) ranging from 75 to 730
and 3 to 1614 copies/L, respectively (Table 3). It is important to
note here that Venice hosts as many as 14 million tourists per
year from all parts of the world. This, coupled with the
inadequate sewage infrastructure in the city of Venice,
suggest that the relatively high levels of these viruses that
we measured may not be characteristic of other urban coastal
waters in Europe. On the other hand, the occurrence of
enteroviruses in European coastal marine waters has been
previously reported for the Mediterranean Sea off Italy
(Muscillo et al., 1999, 1994; Pianetti et al., 2000), along the
beaches of southwest Greece (Vantarakis and Papapetropou-
lou, 1998), and the coastal waters of Northern Ireland (Hughes
et al., 1992).
Extensive studies of the Florida Keys have shown wide-
spread bacterial and viral contamination of nearshore surface
waters often associated with septic systems for sewage
disposal. In a total of 17 canal sites and 2 nearshore water
sites, 79% of the samples sites were positive for enterovirus,
63% positive for HAV, and 11% positive for Norwalk viruses
when samples were assayed by RT-PCR (Griffin et al., 1999). In
southern California coastal waters near the US–Mexico
border, Jiang et al. (2001) found 33% (4 of 12) of marine
samples were positive for adenoviruses as determined by
nested PCR. Interestingly, at these marine sites located
outside of river discharge points, Jiang et al. (2001) noted that
bacteria indicators did not correlate with the presence of
viruses. In our study, concentrations of HAV at the beach on
Lido island were always below the level of detection (Table 3).
However, enteroviruses were detected in all Lido samples at
relatively low levels (uncorrected for recovery efficiency)
ranging from 2 to 71 copies/L (Table 3).
Our seawater samples were processed following a pub-
lished virus concentration method (using negatively charged
filters) for enteroviruses and noroviruses where the recovery
was reported to be 60–70% (Katayama et al., 2002). However, in
ARTICLE IN PRESS
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 4 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 2 3 8 7 – 2 3 9 62394
a more recent study by Fuhrman et al. (2005), using the
Katayama et al. (2002) protocol but modified for subsequent
RNA extraction of the concentrate, recovery efficiencies were
only in the range of 12.3–22.6% for seeded poliovirus in
seawater. In our study, the recovery efficiency of poliovirus
seeded into natural seawater was found to be relatively high
(71%), more comparable to the original results of Katayama et
al. (2002) (Table 2). On the other hand, although the recovery
efficiency of HAV from seawater by the Katayama et al. (2002)
protocol has not been previously reported, we found it to be
rather low (12%) (Table 2). Since the levels of HAV and
enteroviruses in the Venice canals were more or less
comparable, this suggests that the poorer HAV recovery
efficiency might explain why enteroviruses were sometimes
detected at Lido beach, while HAV was not.
The sequence data from all the HAV clones isolated for both
years 2003 and 2004 showed 100% similarity indicating the
prevalence of predominantly a single isolate of HAV in the
sampled region of the Venice Lagoon. Ticehurst et al. (1988)
reported that different human HAV strains of diverse
geographic origin were remarkably closely related. This
isolate was almost identical (98%) to an isolate from Mexico
(accession #AY441441) and only slightly less similar to
isolates from southern Italy (97%; accession #AJ505803),
Argentina (96%; accession #AF452067), and Japan (95%;
accession #AB020569).
A BLAST search of enterovirus sequences identified seven
different enterovirus types. This suggests that although the
primer sequences in the 50-UTR are highly conserved among
enteroviruses, the sequences flanking these primers are
variable enough to distinguish different enterovirus types.
However, the short length of the amplicon (151 bp) did not
allow for discrimination between enteroviral strains (e.g.,
wild type and vaccine strain polioviruses). Among the clones
sequenced, poliovirus 2 was most prevalent followed by
poliovirus 1 and enterovirus 90. A neighbor-joining tree
grouped the enterovirus isolates into two major clades. One
clade contained poliovirus 1 and 2, and enterovirus 90
whereas the second clade contained coxsackievirus A16,
enterovirus B, echovirus 11, and echovirus 13. This is in
general agreement with previously published enterovirus
phylogeny (Muir et al., 1998).
Since we found a predominant type of HAV and enterovirus
(poliovirus 2, the same type as our positive control), one
might argue that this resulted from a contamination event in
the laboratory. However, this is unlikely for several reasons.
First, negative controls run in parallel with positive samples
were consistently negative by both PCR and sequencing. In
addition, four of the water samples positive for poliovirus 2
also contained at least one other type of enterovirus. Finally,
levels of HAV and poliovirus 2 were highly variable among the
water samples.
Despite our detection of low levels of enteroviruses in all
the Lido beach samples, it is important to note here that in
these same samples, thermotolerant coliform levels ranged
from 0 to 155 CFP/L at Lido beach and never exceeded the
criteria under Italian national law (Presidential Decree no. 470
of 1982 which acknowledges European Council Directive 76/
160/EEC on Bathing Water Quality) of an upper limit
(imperative value) for thermotolerant coliforms of 2000 CFP/
100 mL. Indeed, only a single sample taken on 25 May 2005
exceeded the guideline value of 100 CFP/100 mL. Moreover,
while our analysis showed there was a statistically significant
(p ¼ 0.0002) relationship between densities of thermotolerant
coliform bacteria and HAV levels for all the samples pooled
(Fig. 4), there was no significant relationship (p ¼ 0.2572)
evident between thermotolerant coliform indicator densities
and enterovirus levels. This latter result supports the need for
the development of both rapid and sensitive methods to
quantitate human pathogens directly rather than relying on
the conventional bacterial indicators to assess human health
risk in recreational marine waters.
We attempted to interpret enteroviral levels in terms of a
quantitative risk assessment for swimming at Lido beach, by
relating the PCR-quantified viral densities to infectivity.
Donaldson et al. (2002) concluded from data of a side-by-side
comparison of cell culture and real-time RT-PCR for enter-
oviruses, that 55 viral particles in a sample equates to one
infectious particle. Using this infectivity relationship for
enterovirus would equate to 0.04–1.3 infectious particles/L
for Lido beach. Assuming an incidental ingestion of 100 mL of
seawater during swimming, then the risk of infection may
then be calculated by using the beta-Poisson model (Regli
et al., 1991):
Pi ¼ 1� 1þmVb
� ��a(3)
where Pi is the probability of infection resulting from
ingestion of a single volume V of water containing an average
of m organisms per unit volume, and a and b are model
parameters that characterize the dose-response curve ex-
posure. Using the best-fit model parameters of a ¼ 0.409 and
b ¼ 0.788 for poliovirus III (Regli et al., 1991) as being most
conservatively representative of the infectivity of entero-
viruses, the daily risk of enteroviral infection for exposure at
Lido beach can be calculated to range from 1.9�10�3 to
6.1�10�2 with the lowest risk detectable by our method at
1.1�10�3. It is noted here that the risk estimates do not take
into account our recovery efficiency of enteroviruses, but
since the efficiency was relatively high (71%) (Table 2), the risk
outcomes would not be significantly changed by such a
correction. A sensitivity analysis of the risk outcomes using
the beta-Poisson model showed that over a range of 71 order
of magnitude from the base values, the model was nearly
equally sensitive to changes in each model parameter
(though in an inverse way for b).
Since the risk of symptomatic disease may range from 1
percent for poliovirus to more than 75 percent for some of the
coxsackie B viruses (Cherry, 1981), then the daily risk of
disease may be assumed to be no higher than about 4.5�10�2
even at the highest enterovirus level we measured. Such a
conclusion suggests that bathers at Venice’s Lido beach are at
or below the disease risk (5% for gastroenteritis) that is
deemed acceptable by complying with the standards of the
European Directive (Commission of the European Commu-
nities, 2002). It should be noted here, however, that enter-
oviruses can cause a variety of other and more serious disease
symptoms besides (or in addition to) gastroenteritis including
poliomyelitis, aseptic meningitis and myocarditis, but these
ARTICLE IN PRESS
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 40 (2006) 2387– 2396 2395
diseases are not subsumed within the risk outcomes of the
European Union Directive.
Real-time RT-PCR is relatively rapid with respect to current
water quality monitoring procedures, with an entire proces-
sing time of less than 12 h. In addition, this method has the
potential to offer greater sensitivity and quantitative ability
than any single method currently offers. With further
optimization of viral concentration procedures, the applic-
ability of this method to high throughput reproducible assays
could be developed for routine detection of human pathogens
in marine recreational waters impacted by sewage contam-
ination such as the Venice Lagoon.
5. Conclusions
Venice canal samples were often contaminated with high
levels of both HAV and enteroviral genomes, reflecting the
high degree of sewage contamination of these waters. At the
beach on Lido island, concentrations of HAV were always
below the level of detection, and enteroviruses (when
detected), were always present at relatively low levels.
The risk for enteroviral infection (calculated using the beta-
Poisson model) for recreational exposure from swimming at
Lido beach was in the range of 1.9�10�3–6.1�10�2, yielding a
disease risk at or below the level deemed acceptable by
European Guide standards.
There was a statistically significant correlation between
thermotolerant coliform densities and HAV levels, but not
between thermotolerant coliforms and enterovirus levels,
supporting the need for methods to quantitate human viruses
directly rather than relying on the conventional bacterial
indicators.
Acknowledgements
We thank the San Diego State University Research Foundation
and the Office of International Programs of San Diego State
University for financial support. We also thank the Southwest
Center for Environmental Research Policy (SCERP) for techni-
cal support and Walter Hayhow for technical assistance in the
laboratory.
R E F E R E N C E S
Aimo, E., Della Sala, S., Stradella, S.,Tagliapietra, D., Vazzoler, M.,1999. L’inquinamento dei rii: La diffusione degli inquinanti neicanali interni di Venezia. In: Venezia; la citta dei rii. UNESCO-Insula S.p.a., Venezia.
Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z.,Miller, W., Lipman, D.J., 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: anew generation of protein database search programs. NucleicAcids Res. 25, 3389–3402.
American Public Health Association (APHA), 1992. StandardMethods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
Bernstein, A.G., Cecconi, G., 1996. The impact of the Venice tidalbarriers on water quality. In: Proceedings of the InternationalConference on Barrages, Cardiff, UK, September 10–13, 1996.
Blanchard, D.C., 1989. The ejection of drops from the sea and theirenrichment with bacteria and other materials: a review.Estuaries 12 (3), 127–137.
Brooks, H.A., Gersberg, R.M., Dhar, A.K., 2005. Detection andquantification of hepatitis A virus in seawater via real-time RT-PCR. J. Virol. Methods 127 (2), 109–118.
Cherry, J.D., 1981. Non-polio enteroviruses: coxsackieviruses,echoviruses and enteroviruses. In: Feigin, R.D., Cherry, J.D.(Eds.), Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Saunders,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Commission of the European Communities, 2002. Proposal for aDirective of the European Parliament and of the CouncilConcerning the Quality of Bathing Water, Brussels, Belgium.
Deffernez, C., Wunderli, W., Thomas, Y., Yerly, S., Perrin, L., Kaiser,L., 2004. Amplicon sequencing and improved detection ofhuman rhinovirus in respiratory samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42(7), 3212–3218.
Donaldson, K.A., Griffin, D.W., Paul, J.H., 2002. Detection, quanti-tation and identification of enteroviruses from surface watersand sponge tissue from the Florida Keys using real-time RT-PCR. Water Res. 36, 2505–2514.
Fattal, B., Vasl, R.J., Katzenelson, E., Shuval, H.I., 1983. Survival ofbacteria indicator organisms and enteric viruses in theMediterranean coastal waters off Tel-Aviv. Water Res. 17,397–402.
Fuhrman, J.A., Liang, X., Noble, R.T., 2005. Rapid detection ofenteroviruses in small volumes of natural waters by real-timequantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Appl. Environ. Micro-biol. 71, 4523–4530.
Gantzer, C., Senouci, S., Maul, A., Levi, Y., Schwartzbrod, L., 1999.Enterovirus detection from wastewater by RT-PCR and cellculture. Water Science and Technology 40, 105–109.
Griffin, D.W., Donaldson, K.A., Paul, J.H., Rose, J.B., 2003. Patho-genic human viruses in coastal waters. Clinical MicrobiologyReviews 16, 129–143.
Griffin, D.W., Gibson III, C.J., Lipp, E.K., Riley, K., Paul III, J.H., Rose,J.B., 1999. Detection of viral pathogens by reverse transcriptasePCR and of microbial indicators by standard methods in thecanals of the Florida keys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65,4118–4125.
Haramoto, E., Katayama, H., Oguma, K., Ohgaki, S., 2005.Application of cation-coated filter method to detection ofnoroviruses, enteroviruses, adenoviruses, and torque tenoviruses in the Tamagawa River in Japan. Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 71 (5), 2403–2411.
Hughes, M.S., Coyle, P.V., Connolly, J.H., 1992. Enteroviruses inrecreational waters of Northern Ireland. Epidemiology andInfection 108 (3), 529–536.
Jiang, S., Noble, R., Chu, W.P., 2001. Human adenoviruses andcoliphages in urban runoff-impacted coastal waters ofSouthern California. Applied and Environmental Microbiology67, 179–184.
Johnston, P.A., MacGarvin, M., Stringer, R.L., Troendle, S., Swin-dlehurst, R.J., 1993. Sewage: towards realistic environmentalprotection. Water Sci. Technol. 27, 481–491.
Katayama, H., Shimasaki, A., Ohgaki, S., 2002. Development of aVirus Concentration method and its application to detectionof enterovirus and Norwalk virus from coastal seawater. Appl.Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1033–1039.
Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Nei, M., 2004. MEGA3: Integrated softwarefor Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequencealignment. Briefings Bioinform. 5, 50–163.
Leutenegger, C.M., Mislin, C.N., Sigris, B., Ehrengruber, M.U.,Hofmann-Lehmann, R., Lutz, H., 1999. Quantitative real-timePCR for the measurement of feline cytokine mRNA. Vet.Immunol. Immunopathol. 71, 291–305.
Mohamed, N., Elfaitouri, A., Fohlman, J., Friman, G., Blomberg, J.,2004. A sensitive and quantitative single-tube real-time
ARTICLE IN PRESS
WAT E R R E S E A R C H 4 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 2 3 8 7 – 2 3 9 62396
reverse transcriptase-PCR for detection of enteroviral RNA. J.Clin. Virol. 30 (2), 150–156.
Muir, P., Kammerer, U., Korn, K., Mulders, M.N., Poyry, T.,Weissbrich, B., Kandolf, R., Cleator, G.M., van Loon, A.M.,1998. Molecular typing of enteroviruses: current status andfuture requirements. The European Union Concerted Actionon Virus Meningitis and Encephalitis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11(1), 202–227.
Muscillo, M., Aulicino, F.A., Patti, A.M., Orsini, P., Volterra, L., Farra,G.M., 1994. Molecular techniques for the identification ofenteric viruses in marine waters. Water Research 28, 1–7.
Muscillo, M., La Rosa, G., Carducci, A., Cantiani, L., Marianelli, C.,1999. Molecular and biological characterization of poliovirus 3strains isolated in Adriatic seawater samples. Water Res. 33(14), 3204–3212.
Muscillo, M., La Rosa, G., Marianelli, C., Zaniratti, S., Capobianchi,R., Cantiani, L., Carducci, A., 2001. A new RT-PCR method forthe identification of reoviruses in seawater samples. WaterRes. 35 (2), 548–556.
Orlob, G.T., Bale, A.E., Rajbhandri, H., Malagoli, M., 1991. Modelingeffects of tidal barrier closure of Venice Lagoon. Water Sci.Technol. 24, 149–155.
Pavoni, B., Sfriso, A., Donazzolo, R., Orio, A.A., 1990. Influence of
waste waters from the city of Venice and the hinterland on the
eutrophication of the lagoon. Sci. Total Environ. 96, 235–252.
Pianetti, A., Baffone, W., Citterio, B., Casaroli, A., Bruscolini, F.,
Salvaggio, L., 2000. Presence of enteroviruses and reoviruses in
the waters of the Italian coast of the Adriatic sea. Epidemiol.
Infect. 125, 455–462.
Regli, S., Rose, J.B., Haas, C.N., Gerba, C.P., 1991. Modeling the risk
from Giardia and viruses in drinking water. J. Am. Water
Works Assoc. 83, 76–84.
Ticehurst, J.C., Cohen, J.I., Purcell, R.H., 1988. Analysis of
molecular sequences demonstrates that hepatitis A virus
(HAV) is a unique picornavirus. In: Zuckerman, A.J. (Ed.), Viral
Hepatitis and Liver Disease. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 33–35.
Vantarakis, A.C., Papapetropoulou, M., 1998. Detection of enter-
oviruses and adenoviruses in coastal waters of SW Greece by
nested polymerase chain reaction. Water Research 32,
2365–2372.
Vazzoler, M., Stradella, S., 1999. La situazione sanitaria dei canali
interni di Venezia. In: Relazione finale sul progetto UNESCO
‘‘Canali interni di Venezia’’ anno 1998–1999, Venezia, Italy.