Date post: | 05-Nov-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Construction industry is notoriously known to be one of the dangerous industry.
There are many factors in construction industry that affects low safety performance on
construction site. Hence, it ultimately affects the quality of worker and duration of the
construction project.
The portion of health and safety in the construction industry is not a subject which can
be taken lightly. All times in every part of construction process should be put front of
mind because there are numerous danger and accident potential in the construction
industry. On the construction site consists of various element that give hazards among
the workers that is formed of construction materials, machinery equipments, tools and
also handling techniques have their own hazards level. Construction site occasionally
experienced accidents that causes death and injuries on the worker with involves site
vehicles, falls during work, collapse cases, and electric current contact with overhead
power line.
Most of the accident occur in the construction site can be avoided by implementing
higher safety performance and ensuring it to be constantly maintained and controlled.
Good safety performance level ensures the construction site has effective planning,
proper management designed and efficient uses safety techniques. There is merely no
excuse for jump up or cutting corners when operate the health and safety management
in construction industry.
Accidents and injuries always can happens on the construction workplace even through
there are various occupational safety and health requirement that’s because of the non-
enforcement to code of practice in the safety and health management. Contractors are
given the flexibility to choose their methods to carry out their operations safely. Hence,
there are different safety performance level as different practice were implemented on
1
site. According to Zulu & Chileshe (2008), poor safety performance level of many local
contractors give a massive implications in which affecting of their competitiveness in
the construction industry.
1.2 Research Statements
The problems of accident at construction sites shows that Malaysian
construction industry is one of the high challenges sectors to involved that need a
recover and overhaul from the currect site safety practice. Construction industry sector
has been create a high number of injuries percentange on the construction workplace.
Construction workplace has high complexity level, where it need to be carried out with
involvement of large number organization and construction works commonly the
hazardous workplace in which contribute more hazards among the workers. Current
investigation from Department of Safety and Health (DOSH) has shown that
construction sites have the highest death toll among all the industries (DOSH,
2012). In addition, The construction industry is a high danger industry because there is a
high risk of accident occurrence. The reasons can be form of time, cost and quality that
are as the major element considered ahead of safety. Safety issues are always
considered secondary and take a back seat in construction. Actually, in the normal
situation most of the contractor were not implemented comprehensive accident
anticipation policies hovewer more concentrate on capitalize on profit. The organization
don’t highlight on safety and health cause they don’t know how the impact of accident
occurrance on contruction project to the actual cost spends (Abdul R. et al. 2008)
Safety performance aspect on the construction have always been given a great attention
from main contractor in the organizational for provided a decreases of injuries.
Nevertheless, safety problems on construction sites seem to be largely unresolved as the
fatality and injury records in construction continue to plague the industry across the
world. The lack of an effective system to interrupt and prevent the precursors and
2
contributory factors on construction sites is argued to be the critical deficiency of
extant research and practice. (Wua W. et al. 2010).
According to Priyadarshani (2013), even the construction safety performance is a most
important thing in construction project. However, it is usually a secondary concern in a
market-driven society where the main concern is doing minimum total cost completing
project at the required quality and minimum time spent. Thus, safety issues are
considered only after an accident occurs at a construction site with follow up
measures to improve working conditions, especially in developing countries.
1.3 Aim And Objectives
The aim in the research study is to explore the factors that affect the safety performance
on construction site.To achieve this aim the following objective were classified :
Objectives:
1. To identify the safety performance measure on the construction site
2. To identify the factors affecting safety performance in construction site
1.4 Research Questions
The research question was designed troughout the topic to realize the objectives stated.
Objectives 1 : To identify the safety performance measure on construction site
I. What is a safety performance?
II. What are the purpose of safety performance measurement
III. How to measure safety performance?
IV. What are the information needed for safety performance evaluation?
3
Objectives 2 : To identify the factors affecting safety performance in construction site
I. What are the factors influencing safety performance?
II. What are the recommendation to improve safety performance?
1.5 Scope and Limitation
The research topic is related to safety performance in which focuses on the
factors affecting safety performance on site. The expected respondance from contractor
class A in (PKK) or G7 in (CIDB) were focused by the researcher to conducted this
research for generate result as stated in questionnaire. The all information gathering will
be analyze to achieve the objective on the research topic. The researcher conduct the
case study in the middle and east of Malaysian, where the location on around Selangor
and Terengganu state only.
1.6 Significance of Research
Construction industry have been causing human losses and injuries and give a bad
impact on the construction occupational. The main intention for conduct this research is
for investigate the factors that affecting of low safety performance in the construction
site in order reasons for would be:
i. As a indicator to the contractor that if there factor need to be consider that
influence the safety performance in construction site
ii. As a precautions to contractors in the management of safety on construction
sites
4
1.7 Research Methodology
The aim of this research is to explore the factor affecting safety performance on
site in which the information collected to achieve the objective of study throughout
quantitative questionnaire method and literature review as additional information to get
the objective of this study.
Collecting of the data and opinion by the questionnaire from the targeted respondents
in construction company ware selected as a main component as information for research
study. The design format set of questionnaire is use fixed-alternative question that is a
structure of the questionnaire that respondents have a limitation to answering the
question which are closer to them view. The researcher also use rating scale such the
‘Likert Scale’ measurement as drafted consent to targeted respondent for specify to the
level strongly agree or disagree with statement related in set of questionnaire. the
targeted respondent on the construction organization especially site manager, architect,
site engineer, safety officer, quantity surveyor and site supervisor will be given a set of
questionnaire.
The researcher will choose the targeted contruction companies based on the size
of projects to conduct the study with deliver sets of questionnaire which is located
around Shah Alam, Selangor. Researcher carry out the research to the contractor
companies which have class of A in (PKK) or G7 in (CIDB) as an selected respondent
in site organization. The quantities of the questionanaire was distribute for sixty set
questionnaire approximately to the selected respondent in which deliver onto the
construction company based on the population of G7 construction company especially
the companies with the running project around Shah Alam area. In the questionnaire
stage, the process of validation data also be carry out which is the answer on the
quantitative questionnaire will be analysis checked for the purpose accuracy and
suitability with this research topic. The flow of the research is viewed in figure 1.0
5
Figure 1.0 : The Research Stage
6
Aim and Objectives
Research question
Literature review
Questionnaire
Analyzes the data collection
Conclusion & recommendation
Introduction of research
Problem statement
1.8 Content Of Research
Chapter 1: Introduction
This chapter describes on the study topic which is going overview the elements of
introduction of the research topic, problem statements based on research ,drafted aim
and objectives, research question and methodology applied.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Through this chapter, the research commenced by reviewing the relevant literature on
construction safety performance by sources from academic journals. The exploratory
literature is concerns on safety performance definition, information needed in evaluation
and the methods measurement of safety performance. Besides, the researcher also will
exposed the factors influencing safety performance on site and continuous with
recommendation for improving safety performance on the construction site. The sources
also will be get based on data base from internet, reading from book, article and
newspaper. The researcher find literature review as his secondary resources with aim to
investigate the research topics.
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
On this part shows the method used to find the exert information from several sources to
achieve the topics aim and objective. Quantitative questionnaire will deliver to the
selected respondents in order to find the data of the study.
Chapter 4: Research Finding
Research finding is a part of all research data collected from the methodology research
where the information is gathering before to analyze for the next stage.
Chapter 5: Analysis, Conclusion, And Recommendation
For the last chapter stated that all data collection would analyzed properly on the study
research based on the aim of the research topic to bring it to being relevant conclusion
and recommendation.
7
1.9 Summary
Table 1.0 Summary Of Introduction Research
The Factors Affecting Of Low Safety Performance On Construction Sites
Aim Problem statements Objectives Research questions
The aim of
this research is
to explore the
factors that
affect the
safety
performance
on
construction
site
i. Current investigation from
Department of Safety and
Health (DOSH) has
shown that construction
sites have the highest
death toll among all the
industries
ii. Safety issues are always
considered secondary and
take a back seat in
construction
iii. The lack of an effective
system to interrupt and
prevent the precursors and
contributory factors on
construction sites
iv. safety issues are
considered only after an
accident occurs at a
construction site with
follow up measures to
improve working
conditions
To identify the
safety
performance
on construction
site
i. What is a safety
performance?
ii. How to measure safety
performance?
iii. What are the
information needed for
safety performance
evaluation?
To identify the
factors
affecting safety
performance in
construction
site
i. What are the factors
influencing safety
performance?
ii. What are the
recommendation to
improve safety
performance?
CHAPTER 2
8
LITERATURE REVIEW
(SAFETY PERFORMANCE IN CONTRUCTION INDUSTRY)
2.1 Introduction
The condition level of safety performance in the construction industry has been
improving over the years. Health and safety has been recognized as an important
business performance subject (Myers, 2003). In the construction industry the risk of a
fatality is five times more likely than in a manufacturing based industry, whilst the risk
of a major injury is two and a half time higher (Edwin Sawacha, 1999). In addition, the
incidence occur in contruction project is not only involves costruction workers who
suffer from accidents but, one member of the public people including children suffer the
lost and injuries.
Generally, accident at the construction industry can occur due to of lack supervision, or
lack of training and knowledge, or lack to carry out the work process safely, apathy,
carelessness, or downright reckless. In addition to these factors, the short term and
transitory nature of the construction industry, the lack of a controlled working
environment and the complexity and diversity of the size of organizations, all have an
effect on safety performance within the industry (Sawacha, 1999).
2.2 Definition of safety performance
According to previous researches by Bjorn N. and Henrik L. (2008), stated that
safety performance have two different condition where Safety performance
improvements in an organization can increase its resistance or robustness and lower the
risk of accidents. On the other hand, poor safety performance can increase the
organization’s vulnerability and hence increase the risk of accidents. The different
appearance of safety performance condition on site will influence the risk of accidents
among the workers. There is no common definition of safety performance. For instance
safety performance may include; safety organization and management, safety equipment
9
and measures, accident statistics, safety training and evaluation, accident investigations
and safety training practice (Wu et al., 2008).
In this research, safety performance will be defined as the quality of safety and health
with related the whole project work in the construction site. Safety performance can be
considered as a subset of the total performance of an organization (Wu et al., 2008).
2.3 Purpose of safety performance measurement
There are several purpose by measuring the safety performance level in
organization.
1. Provide a information as strategies to control the risks
The main purpose in measurement of safety and health performance level is to
produce and prepare the information as strategies during process and activities
used by an organization to control the risks in safety and health. Performance
measurement also means of identifying the effectiveness of the performance
management system. The main reason in measure the safety performance is to
develop strategies that will eliminate future incidents (P. Carey Ryan, 2012).
Effective and good safety performance measurement provides information on
both condition which is level of performance and why the performance level is
as it is like a result. Measurement information controlling the operation and
development of the safety and health management system and control of risk by:
a) Producing information on how the system practice used
b) Providing part area in which remedial action is required
c) Determine a basis for continual improvement
d) Providing feedback and motivation
2. Provide decision making
10
Productive performance measurement system can help to determine where an
organization is compared to where it want to be, the progress that is necessary
and reasonable, how progress can be achieved, and priorities and effective use of
resources (Mark G. B, 2013). The performance information provide decision
making and helps in deciding :
a) What program is needed in the certain circumstances
b) How the progress might be achieved against particular restraints such as
resources or time.
c) The ways progress might be achieved
d) Priorities and effective use of resources.
3. Addressing different information needs.
Information from safety and health performance measurement is needed in the
organization who have particular responsibilities within the safety and health
management system. The information getting will be used as a preparation to
improve the safety practice and control the safety performance.
4. Provide a complete picture of the organisation’s health and safety performance.
The effectiveness of the performance management system can be determining
by provides performance measurement means (HSE, 2001). That mean, the firm
can known the level of safety and health management level on their
organization. In addition, performance measurement as a basis for making
improvements that will enable objectives to be successes. Safety performance
measurement achieving the output of the occupational health and safety
management system related to the organization’s control of health and safety
risks, based on its OHS policies, objectives and targets.
II.4 Measurement Of Safety Performance
11
Effectively planning system practice in safety management on construction
site is a part of foundation in good performance measurement, that is produce a
performance standard level for the risk control system and management
arrangement system. With that, dimension of the measurement process can be
produced. Researcher by Ng et. al, (2005) stated that improvements to contracting
organisations’ safety standards could inevitably be helped by continuous monitoring
and review of their safety performance. Health and safety risk need to be controlled
properly in order to accident prevention, reduce injuries or work-related health.
Safety management system need a structure for evaluate the safety performance of
construction as a guideline to improve the deficiency in safety and health system. A
effective safety performance evaluation (SPE) framework will also support to
determine potential hazards at an early process in which the unnecessary losses in
life and cost can be prevented from occurred (Ng et. al, 2005).
For the safety performance evaluation in the previous studies, safety performance
evaluation is a significance term in the literature context. For example the goal-
setting and feedback method, Experience Modification Rating (EMR), Incident Rate
(AR), and Score Card (SC) models have been proposed.
Most of this SPE approaches were used in the safety management system in
construction industry. However, The organization firm is able to choose a more
comprehensive SPE framework as their safety system which takes consideration of
factors election SPE to an organization.
Safety plan management process in an organization is part of measurement. Safety
and health management system as service management, production, or financial is
as part of measuring safety performance. Figure 2.0 shows where performance
measurement within the safety and health management system.
12
Policy Policy development
Figure 2.0 : Performance measurement within the health and safety
management system
(Sources : books of A Guide To Measuring Health & Safety Performance)
II.4.1 Accident rate (AR)
Accident rate (AR) is a one comparison method to measuring the safety
performance which regarding with number of accidents occurred on the construction
site. According to (Ng et. al, 2005). Measuring performance based on the number of
accident occur on the construction site, contractor are responsible to reporting and
investigating the accidents to determine what are the factor distribute the potential
hazard onto the construction site.
K. Priyadarshani et. al, (2013) stated that Accident Rate (AR) can be like a applying the
concept of profiling where the organization need to prepare a corporate safety
performance in a certain standard level that are considered important by the client’
13
Planning and implementing
Organising
Auditing
Reviewing performance
Measuring performance
Feedback to improve performance
project managers. Then, companies are then compared based on that standard level and
profile is developed.
Accident Rate (AR) can be a one of the simple method and can get a result with a short
period process but it can became unreliable. This is because the accuracy valuation by
using Accident Rate is depending on the honesty of contractor in reporting their
accidents and incidents (Sunindijo, 2013).
II.4.2 Incidence rate (IR)
The number of lost time cases is a particular term necessary to operate the
method of incidence rate (IR) measurement. The IR need to computed based on the
number of days lost for all lost time cases (Ng et. al, 2005). According to Edward J. et
al, (1996) stated that incidence rates method can be as indicator to the contractor how
they can compares to others and changes for the size of a project. The incidents can
incriminate the amount of lost time cases (lost time incident rate), the amount of days
lost for all time cases (severity rate or lost workday rate), and the number of fatalities,
injuries, and illnesses with and without lost workdays (recordable incidence rate). The
basic equations are as follows:
1. Lost time incidence rate = number of lost time incidents x 200,000 /
employee hours worked
2. Severity rate = number of days lost X 200,000 / employee hours worked
3. Recordable incident rate = number of fatalities and injuries and illnesses
with and without lost workdays X 200,000 / employee hours worked.
II.4.3 Experience modification rating (EMR)
14
Claims paying due to accidents is concerned with worker’s compensation caused
of poor safety performance practice on site (Edward J. et al, 1996). There are many
number of factors can influence the base rate of worker’s compensation insurance either
increase or decrease. The major significant factor is the employer’s safety history.
Based on the S. Thomas Ng et. al, (2005) stated that The EMR reflects the cost
companies have to pay for workers’ compensation insurance. It is essentially the ratio
between actual claims filed an expected claims for a particular type of construction.
However, EMR formulae are relatively complex and different version of calculation
exist practice, EMR is not an appropriate value of safety performance for all type
companies. The method of EMR is based on running average results over several years,
this method cannot truly reflect the current safety performance of companies.
II.4.4 Score card (SC)
Score card is a method to maintain the level of safety performance on
construction project. The SC system as introduced by the Hong Kong Government
consists of six key aspects (works bureau, 2000). In the construction site, the lack of
safety management can be seeing by the provision process. There are more condition in
which need to consider to give high of provision such as provision of the plant, working
environment, instruction, training and implementation of safety work. The provision of
the item need to combine with the maintenance works. Other than that, the aspects of
employment of safety officer and supervisor also can be used in the score card method
to measuring the level of safety performance on site. That operatives are responsible
and implementation of safety and health management system. The evaluation of the
safety performance also can be analyzed by the site accident record.
The score card is designed as a tool to facilitate decision support. It provides an
overview of the process that was implemented for achieve of strategic objectives. The
quality of a scorecard comes primarily from its ability to inform the various actors in the
management system of the presence of deviant situations, and to facilitate decision
making in order to implement the necessary corrective actions. (Frederic et. al, 2011).
15
Greenstreet Berman (2006) provides a tool like a score card for implementation of
measurement health and safety performance on construction site. in their study
compares the level of occupational safety and health performance along two
dimensions: implementation (health and safety management, occupational health
programs) and results (injury rates, employee sickness absences, major incidents).
Every of these elements is rated where a weighting system is used to calculate an output
as overall level of occupational health and safety performance. The highest and lowest
values along the dimension of occupational health and safety performance is compared
to the performance of other construction companies from the same sector activities
involved.
2.5 Information Needed For Safety Performance Evaluation
Safety evaluation is a element in any process of safety management to give a
initiatives for additional improvement level in safety performance. If the safety
evaluation of the safety performance level is not implementing properly caused of
troublesome in the actual function of safety and health management. Besides, the
ineffectiveness of the safety evaluation in the organization avoid the operatives to
known how the condition of safety and health risk are controlled. The controlling and
provision of the safety performance level on site can reduce the number of accident or
work- related ill health.
According to Bottani et al. (2009) safety performance assessment can result to site
improvement with founded good safety management system. Beside, in the certain
viewed based on Evelyn (1995) cited, safety awareness may as a controlled to reduced
poor of obligation to safety management. Evaluation of the safety performance level
need the information based on measuring the hazard burden, measuring the health and
safety culture, measuring management arrangement and risk control system, and
measuring workplace precaution.
2.5.1 Measuring the hazard
1. Measuring the hazard
16
Based on researches by Jimmie (2014) in measure of safety performance,
the records injuries in the past year in an organization from the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) need to indentified by the resercher.
The range of activities which carried out by an organization will create the
hazards, the controlling need to action to the hazard burden in which its can
influence the risks level. The hazard need to be avoid with cooperation of the
operatives on the organization either by the presentation of innately more secure
procedures or by no implementation of a particular activity. If the hazard burden
is decreasing and operation of the safety management system is remain
consistent, it give the result in lowest of risk and a consequent reduction in ill
health and injuries. For examples, the matter of hazardous component on the
work place might be removing so that safety risk can be reduced.
2. Measuring the health and safety management system
The information elements need to consider is:
a) Policy
The safety legislation and policies have a great impact upon the safety level
of a construction worksite (Evelyn, 2004). The safety performance can be
viewed by the implementation type of policy. The effective policy need to
provide in an organization to produce a good safety management system. The
safety and health policy statement should comply which ;
I. Based on legal requirements and good practices
II. Flexible
III. effective implementation.
b) Organising
The performance evaluation process need satisfied the level of adequacy,
existence and effectively implementation of arrangement to :
17
I. Set up and retain the organization management controlled of safety and
health.
II. Establish collaboration and teamwork of relevant groups, safety
operatives, and individuals, therefore safety and health is a smoothly
effort.
III. Establish successful communication of information in the construction
firm.
IV. Securing the competency among the employees in the firm.
c) Planning and implementation
Implementation and planning in the safety management is measure in
term of adequancy, effectively, and sufficiency.
d) Measuring performance
The performance measuring process is an essential element of the safety
and health management sstem, so its operation stage will also should be
monitored.
e) Audit and review
In the final steps in the health and safety management control. The audit
and review adequancy and implementation should be included within the
measuring preocess.
2.5.2 Measuring the health and safety culture
To make sure the risk control in a good condition the factor of health and
safety culture need to be considered. The safety culture can affects the operation of
management safety and health with give a impact of their effectiveness management
system. The safety culture in an organization is dependent upon the safety
commitment of the management and workers towards its safety promotion and
campaigns (Evelyn, 2004). Organizational safety culture can be investigate by
18
conducting the perception of the employee surveys to examine the usefulness of
safety programmes and to observe differences in their attitudes.
There are many part of the activity which support the implementation of a positive
safety culture should be measured ;
a) control
b) communication
c) co-operation
d) competence
Health and safety climate has been used to review the ouput of an organization’s
safety and health culture. Safety and health cimate is amenable to measurement and
health and safety evaluation has developed a safety and health climate survey tool to
allow organizations views of their employess on aspects of safety and health within
their organization. The safety and health culture can influencing safety and health
behaviour of individuals at all level of the organization and the behaviours can be
forming the culture in the organization. Behaviours which encourage a positive
safety and health culture and an effective safety and health management system
should be included within the measurement process (Contract Research Report on
behavioural safety).
2.5.3 Measuring management arrangements and risk control systems
Based on the standard form of contract P.W.D form 203A (Rev. 1/2010) section
10(b) states the contractor need to perform their works in a proper manner and in
accordance with good management practice. The contractor responsible to prepare all
necessary element in management arrangement and risk control system onto
construction site. Measurement process of management arrangements and risk control
system should cover aspects of ;
a. Capability
19
The safety performance evaluation system, there are need to checking on
the arrangement that was designed in safety management like accident
investigation program and risk control system. Thats system to contol and
monitoring the contractor has the capability to create the required outcome. The
program can be collected by audit process in the system and arrangement which
are already taken into account.
b. Compliance
Compliance can be defined as a implementation of the tasks. Althought the
risk control system and management arrangement has a well design in the
organizations but it is never bring to required outcome if organizations don’t
complied or implemented with. Safety performance measurement process should
provide information to classified the rank of compliance with the risk control
system and management arrangement.
c. Deployment
Measurement of deployment are require for produce the information needs
to determine the safety and health management system elements are in place
properly and effectiveness operate across the organization.
Measuring of capability, compliance, and deployment are provide
information on dimension of the risk control system and management arrangement
illustrated in figure 2. 2. This approach prepared management to measure the
performance which the organization can applied that at the different levels. The aim
would be in the box area in according figure 2.2, ( high capability and high
compliance ) deployed across the organization. For the looking at specific
management arrangement can be in (example; competence) and risk control system
can be in (example; confined space entry).
20
capability
High capability
Low compliance
High capability
high compliance
Low capability
Low compliance
low capability
high compliance
Figure 2.1 ; three dimensions of measurement
(Sources : books of A Guide To Measuring Health & Safety Performance)
2.5.4 Measuring workplace precaution
Workplace precaution is a important item need to provide by the
organization onto construction site. Workplace precaution is a requirement of the
contractor to produced a warning or instruction whether to the worker or public
surrounding. This requirement is a one of obligation of the contractor need to follow
up properly to make sure the surrounding of the site place in a proper safety
standard based on the standard form of contract P.W.D form 203A (Rev. 1/2010)
section 10 which is contractors are obligated to commission the works in accordance
with specification. The measurement need provide information to identify the
workplace precaution are followed by the rules in which it is must placing a true
area, have a good operating and give effect to the workers. Poorly defined rules or
rules with a few relevance to the work being performed can be indication that safety
is not important and too many rules make compliance with the them all difficult
(Richard , 1999).
21
deployed
compliance
The purpose of the workplace precautions to provide for controlling a
specific risk in certain condition. The issues are take into account in evaluate the
workplace precaution are :
a) premises
b) plant and materials
c) procedures
d) people
2.6 The Factors Influencing Safety Performance
From the researches were conducted on the literature review there are many
factors elements that give the impact to the safety performance level. It is can be
identified with different items that are policy factor, process factor, personnel factor,
incentive factor, management activities factor and technical factor.
Figure 2.2 : Factors element affecting site safety
22
2.6.1 Management Activities On Site Factors
According to Fang et al. (2004) there are five categories of element safety
management activities on construction site that is safety inspection, safety education,
safety communication, and safety regulation enforcement. The level of safety
performance can enhance effectively with implementation of the sufficient inspection
on the construction workplace with regular process safety meeting on construction site,
so all the safety issue on site can be properly reconciled (Ng et al., 2005).
In addition, Strict regulation enforcement on project site tend to effective governance of
safety management on sites. With the strict regulation enforcement on site, the workers
will comply with safety regulation if the safety management is carry out with fines for
safety non compliance and issuing warning operate. Failure of doing the effective
regulation enforcement on site will increasing the percentage of injuries as a impact of
non compliance of safety regulation on sites ( Probst and Estrada, 2010).
To certainly all the workers in the organization are care about the safety matter and
understanding with the fenomenon of working situation on sites, safety and health
management system should underscore on training and education aspect that will assist
the worker with safety expertise to avoid accidents occurrences (Tam et al., 2004).
Safety performance level can be improve in which participation problem solving
process in communication among the worker of the organization (Michael et al., 2006).
2.6.2 Policy Factor
A safety and health policy is sets of regulation with a arrangement to guide the
organization in the certain condition. It is a general approaches which has drafted and
placing for managing safety and health in organizations. Safety policy is a set of
documents included who does what, when need, and how to do. The policy is
commonly designed by three parts statement:
23
a) A statement of intent which describes the needed action of the workers when
in the certain situation. A set of safety policy indicated commitments the
staff and workers in organization to health and safety.
b) A statement of organization details which describe the parties involved. It is
a part section name those who are responsibilities for safety and health
matter in construction organization.
c) A statement which describe the how the workers put a arrangement in place.
This part section describes the ways to organize the main hazards that have
been determined in risk assessment.
Health and safety management can be enforcement and controlled by create a
framework of policy and legislation forms (Evelyn, 2004). The safety performance level
in the construction workplace can be great affects with implementation of a effective
safety policy in organizations. Apart of the low level safety organization culture with
ill-defined safety roles, insufficiently safety procedure developed, and the poor of safety
policies give a result in low safety performance level on the construction site. the safety
in construction to a considerable extent affect by legislation and the enforcements
(Lingard et. Al 1994).
According to the Ng et. Al (2004) shows the level of safety performance can affected by
the more factors considered such as the development of safety system, safety procedure
and practice, controlling of safety compliance, implement of safety committees at site
level, communication of safety policies to site organization, and involved the
consultation with site staff and safety officer.
24
2.6.3 Process Factor
Process factor can be described as a activities doing the work by the construction
workers that may eventually give a hazard element which can give a impact to their
safety and well-being. Unsafe act unknowingly while doing their works is a commonly
commended by a few member of organization. A most concern for supervise process
factors is the efficiency of organize over the huge numbers of sub-contractor on
construction workplace due to diversification of programs activities. Thus the large
number of subcontracting involve in the construction project give the opportunities of
increasing more numerous accident occurrence (Debrah, 2001).
Different construction method process used need to meet different standards level of
safety. The poor level of the safety and health is affecting by the unsafe condition on
construction site. Accidents occurred on site workplace can be reasoned by many
elements; uncomfortable working conditions at height, tripping over object or striking
against, stepping on, poor lighting conditions, collapse of scaffoldings, earth collapse
during doing excavation process, dangers in lifting operation, fire hazards,
electrocution, insufficient of proper accessibility and also not have adequate training.
Implementation of safety management system and participation in occupational health
and also safety management system (Teo, et al. 2005). During carrying work in the
construction site, safety and health management system influencing the process work in
construction whether it is effective management practice which will deliver to safe
safety condition or poor management practice which produce low safety conditions. So,
the process of the management controlling have a link with the safety performance on
the site place.
25
2.6.4 Personnel Factors
Personnel factor refer to issues of human aspect in the construction activities.
Personnel factor consists of three element that can influence the safety performance on
site such management attitude toward safety, supervisors and worker attitude toward
safety, and human errors. Personel factors is a one of elements factor point through the
safety behaviors of the management and workers within an organization (Evelyn, 2004).
The lack of behaviour and attitudes of the worker in the site work affecting of poor
safety condition where the workers tend to hazard condition.
Analysis of the result by Sawacha et al. (1999) has shown that in terms psychological,
procedural and technical aspects is are considered factors thats linked with the issues of
workers in the construction site which can affecting the level of site safety. The term of
psychological factor can be indicated as a safety behaviour of the organization member
with the obeying the safety and health management system.
Tam et al. (2004) performs a research to determine the component of poor construction
management in China country and as a finding on his study research the major factors
influencing safety perforamnce level consists of “poor safety awareness of top
management”, “lack of training”, “poor safety awareness of project managers”,
“reluctance to input resources to safety” and “reckless operation”.
2.6.5 Incentive Factors
Some studies in favour of the incentive scheme have verified that has reduction of
construction site injuries and accidents has been achieved but others studies showed that
safety level on the construction site did not affect even there are implemented of safety
incentives, some of the construction organization with no a particular issues of incentive
programs has indicated a better safety record than those with the incentive programs.
(Evelyn, 2004).
It has been argued that incentive may be function to increase the safety performance in
workplace hovewer the incentives programs need to design properly and how well the
incentives are being allocated. Teo et al (2005) recommended that incentives programs
26
can be obtain of three main elements thats is monetary issue , non monetary issue, and
disciplinary action.
At certain contractor who consent with the elements of incentives are common in favour
of monetory incentives over other categories of incentives conducted. Monetory
incentive are either used for giving monetory return for supervisory safety incentives
plan and for safety performance of personal (Hinze, 2000).
The result also showed that there was a strong relationship between productivity bonus
pay and safety performance (Sawacha et al. 1999). The Bonus payments given to the
operatives can lead them to achieve the higher production through performing unsafely
at the site. The factor of incentive pay to the worker for carrying the task faster than is
usually the case and the process, therefore the unsafe method is carried on the worplace.
2.6.6 Technical Factors
Technical factors can be comprises machineries and equipment on site, layout of
work, degree of automation, maintenance aspects, design of work environment, risk
control and emergency control and also personal proctective equipment (Sgourou et al.,
2010). Effective technicalities on the construction site that will give systematic and
make better ways as complexity of construction works to obstructive any unsafe
behaviors and condition. Adequate and proper technicalities organize on construction
site will enhance safety performance level.
Procedural and technical factors is a elements affecting the safety performance level.
Procedural and techinical factors are related with provision of training and handling of
safety equipment on site. The lack of provision of training and handling equipment
among the worker give more probability to create hazards which can increase the
accident and injuries in the workplace.
27
2.7 The Recommendation To Improve Safety Performance
There are most important in enhancing site safety condition especially for
humanitarian aspects reasons and caused of increasing spent of workers compensation
issues and occupational safety and health administration fines. Therefore, many
strategies for improving the level of safety performance by investigate of numerical
level of safety performance in the construction organization and projects.
2.7.1 Improve Top Management Role
In the researches Levitt and Parker (1988) was related to good top management
role give high safety performance level on construction site. Top management in
organization such company managers’ should take awareness of safety problem on the
construction site. In addition, the workers were perform better, quicker and more safely
when managers obtained on detailed work planning such as materials, equipments, and
safety requirement before starts the tasks.
2.7.2 Employing Experienced Workers
Safety performance level increases when the organization hold on to their
employees working for more than one year and it is a additional safety advantage when
their employees are work for even longer periods of time (Hinze,1978). Good safer
practice construction companies retain employment of workers for a longer period of
duration (Hinze and Pannullo, 1978). The longer duration period of workers in an
organization have more experience onto their job, therefore the probabilities of incident
can be reduced.
28
2.7.3 Improve Supervision Of Superintendent And Supervisor
Competency of the supervisor on the construction site is one of the elements that
reducing the rate of hazards and risks. Inadequate supervision could lead to fatalities
and injuries and can results of hazards. For the example not compliance of guardrails
specification on the work surfaces or workers not wearing the required personel
protective equipment like hard hats, gloves, insulation sut, vest, and others safety
protection equipment. Commonly, in the construction site applied two types of
supervisors those who supervise the entire projects like superintendents and those
supervise some parts of the workplace or group workers like forepersons. The
supervisors must ensure workers are complying with the rules that have been organized.
According to section 25(2)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, a supervisor
must be a “competent person” that someone who is qualified because of knowledge,
training and experience to organize the work and its performance, familiars and knows
with the act and regulation that apply to the work and has a knowledge of any potential
or actual danger to health or safety in the workplace .
Supervisors are the employer's representative on a construction project and they
are hold the important responsibilities to the organizational according to OHSA Section
27, which ensuring workers work in compliance with required protective devices,
measures and procedures, ensuring workers use or wear any equipment, protective
device or clothing required by the employer, and advising workers of any potential or
actual health or safety danger known by the supervisor.
2.7.4 Trains Safety Program Practices
According to the researches by Hinze and Harrison (1981) as his recommended to
improve the safety performance is the field safety directors trained their subordinate
workers . commonly in the construction site organization, the safety officer, is a human
who are responsible to give trains and information about the safety and health
managements. All the task during construction process need follows all safety
specification requirement to maintain the level safety performance. In addition, hinze
29
and Harrison (1981) also stated a key factors associated with safety success that is a
Safety awards were given to workers. The competition of the worker to achieve the
lowest accident occur in the construction site need to give award either in the forms of
monetary or other service.
2.7.5 Increases Occupational Safety And Health Cost Expenses
Implementation of safety and health system involves the cost need to be expenses by the
contractor to provide all the necessary equipment to prevent the risk in the construction
site. The rate of cost budget expenses for safety and health system on the construction
site can influencing accidents rate and enhancing safety performance system efficiency.
According to Hinze (1988) safety is an important issue, but many people do not feel it is
vital to the success of projects. Research by Tang (1997) into the injuries on 18
construction projects suggested that the higher the investment in safety, the better the
safety performance. Hinze (1988) has found that injury rate tends to be higher on those
projects that were competitively bid. It is common practice for contractors to discount
their jobs just to win the tender, as a result OHS often suffers.
Safety is sometimes found to be the first item to face cost cutting as the employers who
often believe that implementing a safety system will cost more. In addition, managerial
focus tends to concentrate on production and safety does not help production therefore it
suffers when a project runs over budget.
According to the researches by the Richard (1999) the cost of an effective safety and
health program is reported to be about 0.9% of total project costs. The cost in the safety
program estimate included in the elements of:
a) salaries for safety, medical, and clerical personnel
b) safety meeting
c) inspections of tool and equipment
d) orientation training and site inspections
e) personal protective equipment and health programs
30
2.8 Summary
Table 2.0 : Summary Of Literature Review
no Definition of safety performance
Purpose of safety performance measurement
Measurement Of Safety Performance
Information Needed For Safety Performance Evaluation
The Factors Influencing Safety Performance
The Recommendation To Improve Safety Performance
1 According to previous researches by Bjorn N. and Henrik L. (2008), stated that safety performance have two different condition where Safety performance improvements in an organization can increase its resistance or robustness and lower the risk of accidents. On the other hand, poor safety performance can increase the organization’s vulnerability and hence increase the risk of accidents.
Produce the information as strategies to control the risks
Accident rate (AR)
Measuring the hazard burden
Management activities on site factors
Improve Top management role
2 Provide decision making
Incidence rate (IR)
Measuring the health and safety culture
Policy factor Employing experienced workers3
Process factor
4Addressing different information needs who have particular responsibilities
Experience modification rating (EMR)
Measuring management arrangements and risk control systems
Personnel factors
Improve Supervision of superintendent and supervisor
5 safety performance may include; safety organization and management, safety equipment and measures, accident statistics, safety training and evaluation, accident investigations and safety training practice (Wu et al., 2008).
Incentive factors
Trains Safety program practices
6 Provide a complete picture of the organisation’s health and safety performance.
Score card (SC)
Measuring workplace precaution Technical
factors
Increases occupational safety and health cost expenses
31
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
Research methodology can be describe a ways of process that used by the
researcher to finds, collects, analysis data and lastly to give as output of the research
based on observation on the data collects. In this methodology research, the proper
planning for research methodology is making as a guidance in order to get the research
objectives. In this part are further talk about the research flow methods starting from
ways the data is get till how the next processed and analysis to achieve the research
objectives of the study.
In the part chapter have elaborated the process to achieve the finding research. The
methodological process is including several stage which is literature review process,
interview session, and preparation of quantitative questionnaire.
3.2 Research Methodology
In this part of research would give attention on the procedure and process to be
used as a main guide to reach the aim of this dissertation research. With that, all the
information evaluate be sufficient and significant to the topic of research. There are four
process stage have been implement on this study to gathering together with the relevant
data collected. The data collected are operate by using a quantitative method where the
set of questionnaire will be distribute to the selected respondents. The quantitative
method was chosen by researches because it is a best method in collecting data
information from the respondent. Research methodology have several stage method;
a) Literature review
b) questionnaire
c) Data analysis
d) Summary
32
3.2.1 Literature Review
Literature review is a secondary data on this research methodology and it is an
important part in the study research in order to gathering relevant information from the
books, journal, conference paper, data internet and unpublished materials. Through this
chapter, the research commenced by reviewing the relevant literature on construction
safety performance by sources from academic journals.
The exploratory literature is concerns on safety performance definition and information
needed in evaluation of safety performance. Besides, the researcher also will exposed
the characteristics of low safety performance with continuous with factors influencing
safety performance with on site. Literature review commonly is a previous researches
which is done provide information as a guideline in order to enhance understanding of
the study topic. Elimination a lot of information that were previous done by researches
can provide a good guideline to pointed out what part needed to be more focused in this
study research.
3.2.2 Questionnaire
Questionnaire is a set preparation of pre-formulated that the researches need to
writing down on the set of paper to deliver written question to the certain responded
expected and record their answers data collected. all question on the set of quantitative
questionnaire should be understandable, clear, no ambiguity obtained. Therefore, the
respondents can fullil the questions with their desirable anwers.
The researcher will choose the targeted contruction companies based on the size
of projects to conduct the study with deliver sets of questionnaire which is located
around Shah Alam, Selangor. Researcher carry out the research to the contractor
companies which have class of A in (PKK) or G7 in (CIDB) as an selected respondent
in site organization. The quantities of the questionanaire was distribute for sixty set
questionnaire approximately to the selected respondent in which deliver onto the
construction company based on the population of G7 construction company especially
the companies with the running project around Shah Alam area. In the questionnaire
33
stage, the process of validation data also be carry out which is the answer on the
quantitative questionnaire will be analysis checked for the purpose accuracy and
suitability with this research topic.
3.2.2.1 Sampling Data
There were about sixty sets of copy questionnaire be distributed to the expected
respondents in the certain contractor company. The targeted respondent for delivering
this questionnaire in this research are consisted of site manager, architect, site engineer,
safety officer, quantity surveyor and site supervisor in the certain contractor
construction company. This selected respondents were choose by researcher because
they are persons have experience on the construction industry and have knowledge
about management on the construction site.
Quantitative questionnaire is an approach to determine the factor effecting safety
performance on the project site in Malaysian construction industry. Sampling data of
quantitative questionnaire was drafted and corroborate with information needed in the
literature reviews. The process of the delivery of the questionnaire set survey done by
the methods :
a) By email and returned via email though online service internet
b) By conforming communication on telephone calls and asks the questionnaire
question.
c) By hand to hand for selected respondents.
3.2.2.2 The design of questionnaire
The limitation of these questionnaire method is that about the cooperation and
willingness of the respondent in completing the set of questionnaire given. So that, the
forms of quantitative questionnaire is design as straight forward as possible to obtain
information based on the objectives study.
34
The framework structure of these questionnaire as a arts of asking questions which is
need to deliver to targeted respondent for answer the questions. The design format set of
questionnaire is use fixed-alternative question that is a structure of the questionnaire
that respondents have a limitation to answering the question which are closer to them
view with choose one answer only.
The researcher also use rating scale such the ‘Likert Scale’ measurement as drafted
consent to targeted respondent for specify to the level strongly agree or disagree with
statement related in set of questionnaire.
5 4 3 2 1
Strongly agree Agreed Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Example of ‘ Likert Scale’ forms for rating scales measurement
The questionnaire structure consisted of three part such as a, b, c which in section A is a
general information of respondent, section B includes purpose of safety performance
measurement, measurement of safety performance method and information needed for
safety performance evaluation, and section C is a factors influencing safety performance
and recommendation to improve safety performance The information gathered was as
follows:
Section A ;
General information of the targeted respondent
a) Name of respondent
b) Profesion
c) Position
d) Working experience
35
Section B ;
Reasons for implementing safety performance measures
a) Produce the information as strategies to control the risks
b) Provide decision making
c) Addressing different information needs who have particular responsibilities
d) Provide a complete picture of the organisation’s health and safety performance.
The most common method used in measurement of safety performance
a) Accident rate (AR)
b) Incidence rate (IR)
c) Experience modification rating (EMR)
d) Score card (SC)
Common information needed for safety performance evaluation
a) Measuring the hazard burden
b) Measuring the health and safety culture
c) Measuring management arrangements and risk control systems
d) Measuring workplace precaution
Section C ;
Factors affecting safety performance on site
a) Management activities on site factors
b) Policy factor
c) Process factor
d) Personnel factors
e) Incentive factors
f) Technical factors
36
Recommendation to improve safety performance
a) Top management role
b) Workers experience
c) Supervision of superintendent and supervisor
d) Safety program practices
e) Improve supervision of superintendent and supervisor
3.2.4 Data Analysis
All the data and information collected through literature review, questionnaires,
and interviews will need to be gathered, summarized and analyzed. For the data from
the quantitative questionnaire will compile with using average index method.
Information that will be analyzed is Information needed in safety performance
evaluation, factors affecting safety performance on site, and recommendation to
improve safety performance. Then, The results will analyzed by using descriptive
statistic method and the result from the finding will be show in the form of graphs such
as pie chart and histogram.
37
3.2.4.1 Average index
The average index can be assess by used formula:
Average index = Ʃ aixi
Ʃ xi
Where;
ai = constant expressing the weight given to i
xi = variable expressing the frequency of respondent, for i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
the categories of scales are ;
1 = strongly disagree 1.00 ≤ min index < 1.50
2 = disagree 1.50 ≤ min index < 2.50
3 = neutral 2.50 ≤ min index < 3.50
4 = agree 3.50 ≤ min index < 4.50
5 = strongly agree 4.50 ≤ min index < 5.50
38
3.6 Summary
This chapter describes in detail the flow by flow of the study research from the
initial stage to the end in achieve the objectives of this research. The researcher show
the method used to get data from several method which is primary data and secondary
data. The result collected either from questionnaire and interview session will gathered
data of the study. Lastly, the percentage analysis are used to summarize the data
collected for create the result of research
Table 3.0 summary of methodology
No Research objective
Research question Research method
Components of questionnaire
respondents
1To identify
the safety
performance
on site
I. What is a safety
performance?
II. How to measure
safety
performance?
III. What are the
information needed
for safety
performance
evaluation?
Questionnaires
Literature review
Section A ; General
information of the
targeted respondent
Section B ;
identification of
safety performance
on site
Safety officer
Site manager
Site supervisor
2To identify
the factors
affecting low
safety
performance
in
construction
site
I. What are the
factors influencing
safety
performance?
II. What are the
recommendation to
improve safety
performance?
Section C ; factors
affecting safety
performance on site
Section D ;
recommendation to
improve safety
performance
39
CHAPTER 4
DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Introduction
This chapter is a stage to analyses the data collected that was carried out from
the quantitative questionnaire. In the process of data collected, the researcher was using
Microsoft Excel to establish the pie chart and bar chart for indicate the data result from
the analyzed of the quantitative questionnaire. Beside, the result of the average index
also will be show in the table with arrangement from the high score to below.
In this part, the data collected are presented based on arrangement from the
questionnaire content in which was separated in three section,. Section A is on personal
background, section B includes the purpose of safety performance measurement,
measurement of safety performance method and information needed for safety
performance evaluation. For the last section C includes the factors influencing safety
performance and recommendation to improve safety performance. In the process of
collecting data, the researcher prepared about sixty set of questionnaire for distribute to
the selected respondents who are involved in construction site work. The questionnaire
was deliver to the respondents through visit the construction site and distribute to the
organization site worker. The researcher also take the alternative to search the company
head office for sending the questionnaire.
From the sixty copies of questionnaire was given to the respondents, forty one copies
were received to the researcher. It is can be presented in 68.33% get the return from the
selected respondents to the researcher.
40
4.2 Data analysis and finding for section A (Personel Background)
4.2.1 Respondent position
Respondent background in the section A was analyzed based on five personel
categories designed in the questionnaire set there are type of firm, job position,
academic qualification, field expertise and working experience.
97%
3%
Type of Firm
constructionconsultancy
Figure 4.0 : Type of Firm
Based on the initiated analyses, most of respondents from this researches are
from the construction company firm and only one respondent from them is from
consultancy firm. 97% percent out of 41 copies useable questionnaires were from
contractors, which represent the largest groups of response in this research. Contractors
provide valuable information as they are those who deal with the front line of the
construction. They are those who face problems and make decision when have a trouble
in safety aspect on the construction site. Therefore, the result from these respondents
would give a clear overview of safety and health management in the construction
workplace.
41
From the questionnaire designed, the job position of respondents was analyzed in
position of project manager, engineer, quantity surveyor, safety officer, and supervisor.
The numbers of respondents position involved in the research was compute according to
figure 4.1.
5%
35%
10%
24%
26%
Respondents position
project managerengineerquantity surveyorsafety officersite supervisor
Figure 4.1: Job Position Of Respondents
Based on figure 4.1, there were five type of position of the respondents involved in
research. Based on the analysis that has been done, the highest percentage of 35%
respondent work as an engineer with frequency of 14 person. Many of profesional
workers involved on the construction site on Shah Alam comes from the engineer
profesion. They have more knowledge about the environment on the construction site
and also liable to maintain and control the construction work.
The second highest are supervisors of 26% with frequency of 11 respondents. The
supervisor are responsible to supervise and monitor the activities of the workers and
also liable to take care the safety of their workers during construction process. The third
42
highest involved are safety officer of 24% with frequency of 10 respondents follow by
quantity surveyor with ten percent with frequency of four respondents. The last is
project manager with five percent only with frequency of two respondent that get
feedback to the questionnaire given.
4.2.2 Respondents academic qualification
27%
62%
11%
academic qualification
diplomadegreemasterPHD
Figure 4.2: Academic Qualification Of Respondents
According to figure 4.2, it indicate the academic qualification of the respondents
in this research. The highest percentages in reference to academic qualification is 62%
which represent degree qualification. This is because the demand of the degree
qualification for the construction work is high. Degree holders have high level of
academic knowledge depend on the diploma qualification holder. Therefore, their
opinions are very useful and provide true insights to the research questions. The second
highest are consists of respondents who are graduated from diploma level where it
represented of 27% with frequency of 11 respondents. The lowest are master level with
10% which is 4 respondent.
43
4.2.3 Respondents Working Experience
61%
31%
8%
working experience
1-5 years5-10 years> 10 years
Figure 4.3: Working Experience Of Respondents
Based on figure 4.3 show that the experience of the selected respondents
involved in questionnaire research. More than half from the respondents have 1-5 years
working experience on the construction site where it represented of 61% with frequency
of 25 number of respondents. This show that many of the respondents have a little
experience on the construction industry because most of them were fresh graduates.
Respondents who are have 5-10 years working experience is about 31% with total
frequency of 13 respondent. Most of them have more experience and knowledge
adapted from the work and also known how to conduct the works efficiently. Lastly,
three of the respondents involved have more than 10 years of working experience in the
construction industry. They are two project manager and one safety officer.
44
4.3 Data analysis and finding for section B
This section designed in way to know the purpose for implementing safety
performance measurement and the most common method used in measurement of safety
performance and also information needed for safety performance evaluation.
Respondents are required to fulfill the answer on the questionnaire with rating scale
based on their knowledge and experience on construction industry. Table 4.1 shows the
rating scale form that was used by the researcher.
Table 4.1 : Rating scale
RATING SCALE
Strongly agree 5
Agree 4
Neutral 3
Disagree 2
Strongly disagree 1
the categories of scales are ;
1 = strongly disagree 1.00 ≤ min index < 1.50
2 = disagree 1.50 ≤ min index < 2.50
3 = neutral 2.50 ≤ min index < 3.50
4 = agree 3.50 ≤ min index < 4.50
5 = strongly agree 4.50 ≤ min index < 5.50
45
4.3.1 Reasons for implementing safety performance measure in firm
This part were designed in order to know about the purpose for implementing
safety performance measurement in construction project. It is also a way to determine
the number frequency of the different types of purpose implementation of safety
performance measurement.
0
5
10
15
20
25
17
1315
17
2223
20 20
1
4 4
11 1 13
0 0 1 0
strongly agreeagreeneutraldisagreestrongly disagree
Figure 4.4 : Reason Why Implementing Safety Performance Measure In Firm
46
Table 4.2 : Purpose Of Safety Performance Measurement
Purpose 1 2 3 4 5 Avearge
index
Rank
Produce the information as
strategies to control the risks
- 1 1 22 17 4.34 1
Provide decision making - 1 4 23 13 4.17 3
Addressing different information
needs who have particular
responsibilities
1 1 4 20 15 4.12 4
Provide a complete picture of the
organisation’s health and safety
performance.
- 3 1 20 17 4.24 2
Based on figure 4.4, it shows the purpose of safety performance measurement
need to be carry out on the construction site. From the questionnaire survey analysis, the
results shows that all the reasons stated are important reasons for implementation of
safety performance measurement on the construction firm. That can be proved with high
level of average index output from the questionnaire analysis for each element reasons.
Produce the information as strategies to control the risks is a reasons that get a highest
level of average index 4.34. Most of respondents are agreed on that reason, so that it is
became a very important reason for implementing safety performance measure on
construction firm because suitable information getting from the safety performance
measurement can be applying to control the safety risk. The safety and health on the
construction can be improve when get the information toward weakness of the safety
practice and known recommended area on the site in which remedial action is required.
47
The second reason why implementing safety performance measurement is to provide a
complete picture of the organization’s health & safety performance with 4.24 average
index. Most of respondents are agree on that reason because safety performance
measurement can produce a result of safety condition on the firm. Result can be form by
either the level condition of the safety is on standard requirement or need to take others
requirement action.
For the third purpose of safety performance measures is to provide decision making
with 4.17 average index. Therefore, it showed that safety performance measures can
helps in deciding what program is needed in the certain circumstances. Lastly, the
lowest average index is about 4.12, that reason is a addressing different information
needs who have particular responsibilities in the construction organization. This because
among of workers in the construction organization there are only one position who are
have particular responsibilities on the Safety and health, that is a safety officer.
Table 4.2 shows the analysis of respondents choose the answer in five frequency
analysis where stated from number one to five as like as strongly disagree to strongly
agree. From the table that, the result can be conclude with the number of ranks where
the most important purpose for implementing safety performance measurement is to
produce the information as strategies to control the risks. The second purpose is to
provide a complete picture of the organization’s health and safety performance on the
company firm. The third purpose is to provide decision making in the certain
circumstances and addressing different information needs who have particulars
responsibilities.
48
4.3.2 Common method used in measurement of safety performance
02468
101214161820
9
6 5 6
20
15 14
17
11
1719
13
0 1 1 11 1 1 2 strongly agreeagreeneutraldisagreestrongly disagree
Figure 4.5 : Methods Used In Measurement Of Safety Performance
Table 4.3 : analysis for method used in measurement of safety performance
Method 1 2 3 4 5Average
index
rank
Accident rate (AR) 1 - 11 20 9 3.88 1
Incidence rate (IR) 1 1 17 15 6 3.51 3
Experience modification rating
(EMR)1 1 19 14 5
3.44 4
Score card (SC) 2 1 13 17 7 3.56 2
49
Based on the figure 4.5 shows the methos used in measurement of safety
performance there are Accident Rate (AR), Incidence Rate (IR), Experince Modification
Rating (EMR), Score Card (SC). From the questionnaire survey analysis Accident Rate
(AR) have a highest average index of 3.88. That shows most of respondents was choose
Accidents Rate (AR) as the most common method used in measurement safety
performance. This is because Accident Rate (AR) is a simple method and the safety
performance result can be produced with a short period process but it can became
unreliable. Accident Rate (AR) is a method where use the comparison of the number
accidents occurred on the construction site
The second common method used is Score Card (SC) with 3.56 average index, based on
the analyzed have been done, Score Card (SC) was ranged in second common method
used for safety performance measurement. This because Score Card (SC) involved a
specific provision where there are consists of six key aspect such as provision of the
plant, working environment, instruction, training and implementation of safety work. In
the construction site, the lack of safety management can be seeing by the provision
process.
For the Incidence Rate (IR) method, it was ranged in the third common method used for
measurement safety performance. This because Incidence Rate (IR) method are not too
compatible among the respondents caused the IR need to computed based on the
number of days lost for all lost time cases occurred and also involved the calculation
process.
The lowest method used is Experience Modification Rating (EMR) with 3.44 average
index. Most of the respondents were neutral with that method, Experience modification
rating (EMR) is method used based on reflects the cost company have to pay for
worker’s compensation insurance. This because EMR formulae are relatively complex
and different version of calculation exist practice, EMR is not an appropriate measure of
safety performance for all type companies. In addition, as the EMR is based on running
average results over several years, this method cannot truly reflect the current safety
performance of companies.
50
4.3.3 Common information needed for safety performance evaluation
05
10152025
18 1821 22
19 1815 15
2 2 2 10 1 2 31 1 1 0
strongly agreeagreeneutraldisagreestrongly disagree
Figure 4.6 : information needed in safety performance evaluation
Table 4.4 : Elements Of Information Needed For Evaluation Of Safety
Performance
Information Needed 1 2 3 4 5Average
index
rank
Measuring the hazard burden 1 - 2 19 18 4.22 3
Measuring the health and safety
culture1 1 2 18 18
4.17 4
Measuring management arrangements
and risk control systems1 2 2 15 21
4.29 2
Measuring workplace precaution - 3 1 15 22 4.37 1
51
According to the figure 4.6 shows that information needed for safety
performance evaluation. There are four element need to be consider during the process
of safety performance evaluation, there are measuring the hazard burden, measuring the
health and safety culture, measuring management arrangement and risk control systems
and measuring workplace precaution. All this information can be indentify in one of
construction projects company caused when a construction project is running there are
involved more management and processes to complete the construction.
In the construction safety and health, workplace precaution is a important issue need to
measure by the worker especially safety officer in order for evaluate safety performance
on the construction site. It can be proved that respondents were agreed with highest
average index of 4.37. Measuring workplace precaution is a most common information
needed for evaluation caused it have been in number one ranked among others element.
Therefore, workplace precaution need to be take high consideration when designing the
safety plan.
The second common information needed in safety performance evaluation is measuring
management arrangements and risks control system with average index of 4.29. It
showed that, most of the respondent were agreed where contractors responsible to
prepare all necessary element in management arrangement and risk control system onto
construction site. That element should be satisfied properly to ensure evaluation of the
safety performance in a good condition level.
Beside, measuring the hazard burden also have a high level of average index 4.22
however it is a third choice information that’s respondents need for safety performance
evaluation. The respondent were agree measuring hazard burden are important element
need to satisfied. This is because construction site involved more hazard burden need to
take care to reduce the risks on the construction site. Hazard burden could be in any
components such as materials, machineries or environments stated on the surrounding
of the site.
The last element result from the respondents survey that information needed for safety
performance evaluation is to known the health and safety culture with 4.17 average
52
index. It showed that respondent are agree measuring the health and safety culture need
to executed. This is because the safety culture can affects the operation of management
safety and health with give a impact of their effectiveness management system. The
rank of the most information needed for making value of the safety performance can
refer the table 4.4. From the analysis all the information elements is a important matter
need to measuring and record in order to determine the level of each elements, its can be
proved by high score of average index result from the questionnaire survey.
4.4 Data analysis and finding for section C
For the section C, data analysis and finding includes of the factors influencing
safety performance and recommendation to improve safety performance
4.4.1 Common factors that influencing safety performance on site
0
5
10
15
20
25 22
13
19 20
13
22
1417
1518
20
12
2
10
63 4 43
0 1 0
4
00 1 0 0 03
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
Figure 4.7 : Factors Influencing Safety Performance
53
Table 4.5 : data analysis of factors affecting safety performance
Factors 1 2 3 4 5Average
index
rank
Management activities on site
factor- 3 2 14 22
4.34 2
Policy factor 1 - 10 17 13 4.00 6
Process factor - 1 6 15 19 4.12 4
Personnel factors - - 3 18 20 4.41 1
Incentive factors - 4 4 20 13 4.02 5
Technical factors 3 - 4 12 22 4.22 3
The factors affecting the safety performance on construction site are as discussed
in figure 4.7. There are six categories of factors as pointed on the figure that and each of
the categories has its own rank stated on table 4.5. From the research survey of the
respondents, all the factors are contribute to the affecting toward safety performane on
site. From the analyzed the data collected that personnel factors is a number one ranked
among others factors. So that, the most factors influencing that is personnel factors with
average index of 4.41. Personnel factors related on the human issues means that involve
the construction workers on the organization. Personnel factor can be consists of
management attitude toward safety, supervision and worker attitude toward safety, and
human errors. The respondents were stated the attitude of humans is a element that give
more impact to the safety performance on site. The poor behaviour of the worker were
give a impact on their task such as personel protection equipment (PPE) uses. Other
than that, the lack of awareness among the workers also contribute to the risk and
injuries occurred. The human error and a little experience on the construction
environment also influencing the safety and health on site.
Management activities on site is a second common factors affecting safety performance
with 4.34 average index and represent of number two in ranked. Management activities
54
on site means that how the worker planning their work activities on the workplace, that
includes during the design of the site layout until the maintenance of the building.
management activities on site effecting safety performance because the risks can arise
on the construction site when the lack of management conducted.
Next issue of affecting safety performance is a technical factors with 4.22 average
index. Based on analyzed, respondents were agreed that factor contributing to the
affecting of safety performance. This is because Effective technicalities on the
construction site will produce systematic process and make better ways as complexity
of construction works to obstructive any unsafe behaviors and condition
The factors in number four in ranked is a process factors with average index of 4.12.
Based on the analysis have been done, respondents were believe process factor can
influencing safety performance on the construction site. The process factors is a
activities during the construction that effect the safety and health. It can be from lack of
method statements, equipments, and skill during do the task can influencing the safety
on construction site
Next factors is number five in ranked, that is a incentive factors with average index of
4.02. Most of the respondents were agreed with that factor which can affecting the
safety performance on site. Incentive factor is common related to the budget issues for
preparation safety and health requirement. That mean, the poor of budget recommended
on the safety and health designed can influencing the safety system on the construction
site. For the last ranked factor is about policy in which a safety and health policy sets
regulation with a arrangement to guide the organization in the certain condition. Most of
the respondents also agree with average index of 4.00. That show policy can also
influencing the safety performance because policy is a set of regulation where can
organizing the safety system on the construction site.
55
IV.4.2 The recommendations in improving safety performance.
Improve Top management
role
Employing experienced
workers
Improve Supervision
Trains Safety program practices
Increases OSHA cost expenses
0
5
10
15
20
25
18
15
2123
14
1112
1113
15
119
5
2
8
12
13
113 3
0
3
strongly agreeagreeneutraldisagreestrongly disagree
Figure 4.8 : Recommendations For Increasing Safety Performance Level
Table 4.6 : Data Analysis For Recommendation To Improve Safety Performance
Recommendation 1 2 3 4 5Average
index
rank
Improve Top management role 1 1 11 11 18 4.15 2
Employing experienced workers 3 2 9 12 15 3.83 5
Improve Supervision of superintendent and
supervisor3 1 5 11 21
4.12 3
Train Safety program practices 0 3 2 13 23 4.37 1
Increases occupational safety and health cost
expenses3 1 8 15 14
3.88 4
56
Figure 4.8 indicated some of the possible ways to enhance safety performance
level on the construction site. Based on the result of questionnaire surveys, the
respondents were agreed with the trains safety program practices should be executed
and give more attentioned on the organization’s firm. That can be proved with highest
average index presented of 4.37. That mean, the worker who are regularly involved to
the construction working should to attend the safety training or any safety practice
program to increace the level of knowledge about the safety requirement in the certain
standard.
The second ways for increasing safety performance level with improve top management
role with average index of 4.15. Respondents were agreed that top management role can
increase safety performance level on construction site where need some improvement
for the top management role toward safety and health practices. The awareness of the
workers especially the manager is a important things to give a high attention about the
health and safety aspects.
The third ways recommendation is to improve supervision of superintendent and
supervisor. Respondents were agreed that particular recommendation with average
index of 4.12. That mean, respondents believe with adequate supervision could lead to
awareness and caution of the workers during construction process for take care any
safety requirement to avoid any penalty action. The fourth selected technique from the
analysis for improving safety performance level is employing experienced workers to
carry out the tasks on the workplace. It can be proved with average index of 3.88. That
mean, most of respondents believe that the firm also can hold on their employees
working for longer periods of time in their organization to preserve their knowledge and
experience about safety and health.
The last ways as a recommendation to improve safety performance level on the
construction site by increase occupational safety and health cost expenses with 3.83
average index. There were represented that respondents were agreed for that
recommendation. That mean, respondents believe that contractor need to consider the
budget expense for safety and health in the construction to prepare all the safety
equipment and requirement. The good budget allocated can enhancing safety
performance system efficiency.
57
4.5 Summary
Table 4.7 : summary of the data analysis
Question Result
Reasons for implementing safety
performance measure in firm
Produce the information as strategies to control
the get a highest level of average index 4.34.
Common method used in
measurement of safety
performance
Accident Rate (AR) have a highest average index
3.88
Common information needed for
safety performance evaluation
Measuring workplace precaution have a highest
average index 4.37
Common factors that influencing
safety performance on site
Most important factors influencing that is
personnel factors with average index 4.41.
The recommendations in
improving safety performance
Trains safety program practices have a highest
percentages average index 4.37
As a summary of chapter four, the question was filled by respondents then get
the result from the data analysis have been done. From the result that, Produce the
information as strategies to control the risks is a reasons that get a highest level of
average index 4.34. Most of respondents are agree on that reason, so that it is became a
very important reason for implementing safety performance measure on construction
firm. besides, Accident Rate (AR) have a highest average index of 3.88. That shows
most of respondents was choose Accidents Rate (AR) as the most common method used
in measurement safety performance.
Next, Measuring workplace precaution is a most common information needed for
evaluation caused it have been in number one ranked among others element. Other than
that, all the factors are contribute to the affecting toward safety performane on site
however the most factors influencing that is personnel factors with average index of
4.41. Based on the result of questionnaire surveys, the respondents were agreed with the
trains safety program practices should be executed and give more attentioned on the
organization’s firm. That can be proved with highest average index presented of 4.37.
58
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.0 Introduction
This chapter have conclusion and recommendation from the research topic. In
the conclusion part, there have discussion about the finding that have been gathered
based on objectives research. Then, recommendation of this research will be stated and
recommendation for future study also will be written on this chapter as a enhancement
for the research.
5.1 Conclusions
This aim of the research is to explore the factors that affect the safety
performance on construction site. The purpose of this chapter is to conclude all the
findings that have been collected from data analysis on the chapter four. The two
research objectives stated on the research topic have been successfully achieved and the
findings are conclude based on the objectives of the topic as follows;
5.1.1 Objectives 1 : To identify the safety performance measurement on the
construction site
This objectives is to identify the safety performance measurement on the
construction site. From the result on the questionnaire, Accident Rate (AR) is a common
method used to identify the safety performance on the construction site than others
method. This because (AR) method is a simple ways to measure the level of safety
performance on site. In addition, on the literature review, Accident Rate (AR) can be a
one of the simply method and can get a result with a short period process but it can
became unreliable. This is because the accuracy valuation by using Accident Rate is
depending on the honesty of contractor in reporting their accidents and incidents.
59
Besides, workplace precaution is a important issue need to measure by the worker
especially safety officer in order to get information needed for identify safety
performance on the construction site. The common reasons for implementing safety
performance measurement is to produce the information as strategic to control the risk
on the construction site.
5.1.2 Objectives 2 : To identify the factors affecting safety performance on the
construction site
The factors influencing safety performance on the construction site is mainly due
to personnel factor. The respondents were agreed that attitude of humans is a element
that give more impact to the safety performance on site. In the literature review also
inform that Personel factors is a one of elements factor point through the safety
behaviors of the management and workers within an organization. The lack of
behaviour and attitudes of the worker on the workplace affecting of poor safety
condition where the workers tend to hazard condition. However, respondents also
agreed with others factors that are contribute to the affecting toward safety performane
on site. There are management activities on site factor, technical factor, process factor,
incentive factor, and policy factor.
5.2 Recommendation
This finding of the study provides an recommendation to improve safety
performance on the construction site. The researcher found some initiatives to increases
the level of safety performance that can be used to conduct safety and health
management system. There are produce trains safety program practices for the workers
in the organization, improve top management role, and improve supervision of
superintendent and supervisor. Other than that, the firm also can increases occupational
safety and health cost expenses and also employing experienced workers to involve on
the construction site. The respondents also recommend the implementation of Behavior
60
Based Safety (BBS) to improve safety awareness in the construction site. For some
foreign workers, respondents recommend to provide health screen system for checking
the foreign workers. This is because some of the foreign workers were bring the critical
illness from their country like TIBI, HIV/AID, Influenza A H1N1, H5N1, malaria,
hepatitis and others virus illness.
5.2.1 Recommendation for future research
This research study gives an element factors affecting safety performance on the
construction site. Nonetheless, there are still some part of safety performance research
that can be look into for conduct further studies and further improvement can be made.
The following recommendation can be considered as a guide for future research :
1. To study the safety elements need to consider during implementation of
Accident Rate (AR) method for safety performance measurement
2. Improvement for focusing on certain factor that influencing safety performance
level
3. To identify criteria for standard safety performance requirement on the
construction site
4. To identify the implication of poor safety performance applied on the
construction site
61
REFERENCES
Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, Muhd Zaimi Abd Majid , Bachan Singh (2008). Causes Of
Accidents At Construction Sites. Malaysian Journal Of Civil Engineering 20(2) :
242 - 259
Book of standard form of contract P.W.D form 203A (Rev. 1/2010)
Contract Research Report on behavioural safety - currently in production. Contract
Research Reports are available on the HSE website on
www.hse.gov.uk/research/frameset/crr/index.htm.
C. M. Tam, S. X. Zeng, and Z. M. Deng. Identifying elements of poor construction
safety management in China. Safety Science. 2004, 42(7):569-586.
Debrah YA, Ofari G. Subcontracting, foreign workers and job safety in singapore
construction industry. Asia Pac Bus Rev 2001;1(8):144-66.
DOSH. Occupational Accidents by Sector for the Category of Death until May
2012.Retrieved August 18, 2012,
fromhttp://www.dosh.gov.my/doshv2/index.php?
option=com_phocadownload&view=category&id=9&Itemid=141&lang=en
E.A. L. Teo, F. Y. Y. Ling, and A. F. W. Chong. Framework for project managers to
manage construction safety. International Journal of Project Management.
2005, 23(4): 329-341.
Edward J. Jaselskis,t Associate Member, ASCE, Stuart D. Anderson,z, Associate
Member, (1996) ASCE, and Jeffrey S. Russell/ Member, ASCE. Strategies For
Acideving Excellence In Construction Safety Performance. Journal Of
Construction Engineering And Management / March 1996/61
Edwin Sawacha, Shamil Naoum and Daniel Fong (1999). Factors affecting safety
performance on construction sites. International Journal of Project Management
Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 309±315, 1999
62
Evelyn ai lin teo, florence yean yean ling, adrian fook weng chong, (2004) framework
for project manager to manage construction safety. A international journal of
project management vol. 23 (2005) 329-341
Frederic Juglaret, Jean-Marc Rallo, Raoul Textoris, Franck Guarnieri, Emmanuel
Garbolino (2011). Occupational Health and Safety Scorecards : New leading
indicators improve risk management and regulatory compliance. 40th ESReDA
Seminar - Risk Analysis and Management Across Industries, Bordeaux, France.
16
Hinze, J., and Harrison, C. (1981). "Safety programs in large construction firms." J.
Constr. Div., ASCE, 107(3),455-467.
Hinze, J., and Pannullo, J. (1978). "Safety: function of job control." J. Constr. Div.,
ASCE, 104(2), 241-249.
Hinze J, Wilson G. Moving toward a ero injury objectives. Constr Eng Manage
2000;7(2):81-4.
HSE (2001) Book of guide to measuring safety and health performance
Jimmie Hinze, M.ASCE,1 and John Gambatese, M.ASCE2 (2003). Factors That
Influence Safety Performance of Specialty Contractors. Journal Of Construction
Engineering And Management. 2003.129:159-164.
J. H. Michael, Z. G. Guo, J. K. Wiedenbeck, & C. D. Ray. Production supervisor
impacts on subordinates' safety outcomes: An investigation of leader-member
exchange and safety communication. Journal of Safety Research.
Kanchana Priyadarshani, Gayani Karunasena and Sajani Jayasuriya (2013) Construction
Safety Assessment Framework for Developing Countries: A Case Study of Sri
Lanka. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(1), 33–51, 2013
Levitt, R. E., and Parker, H. W. (1976). "Reducing construction accidents-top
management's role." J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 102(3), 465-478.
63
Lingard H, Rowlinson S. Construction site safety in Hong Kong. Constr Mnage
Econ 1994;501-10
Myers, K. (2003),’Health and safety performance in the construction industry’,
Health and safely Executive, (2003) Volume 9.
Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER O.1
P. Carey Ryan, (2012) Performance Indicators for Occupational Health and Safety: A
Review of Selected Literature. Novus Consulting
Richard D (1999), Construction Site Safety: a guide for managing constractor.
International Standard Book. Lewis Publishers is a an imprint of CRC Press
LLC.
S. Thomas Ng, Kam Pong Cheng, Martin Skitmore, (2005). Journal of a framework for
evaluating the safety performance of construction contractors. Building and
environment 40(2005) 1347-135.
Samelson, N. M., and Levitt, R. E. (1982). "Owner's guidelines for selecting safe
contractors." J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(4),617-623.
Sunindijo, R Y and Zou, P X W (2013) ‘The roles of emotional intelligence,
interpersonal skill, and transformational, leadership on improving construction
safety performance’, Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and
Building, 13 (3) 97-113
Tang, S. (1997), "Safety cost optimization for building projects in Hong Kong",
Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 15 pp.177‐86
Workplace Safety Strategy for Nova Scotia 2013‐2017,Summary of Findings from Con
sultation and Research: Safety System Performance Measurement
Weiwei Wua, Alistair G.F. Gibbb, Qiming Li a (2010). Accident precursors and near
misses on construction sites: An investigative tool to derive information from
accident databases. Journal of Safety Science 48, pp 845–858
64
Wu, T.C., Chen, C.H., Li C.C., (2008). A correlation among safety leadership, safety
culture and safety performance. Journal of loss prevention in the process
industries. Vol. 21, pp. 307-318.
Zulu, S.; Chileshe, N. 2008. The impact of service quality on project performance: a
case study of building maintenance services in Zambia, in Proc. of the 3rd Built
Environment Conference, Association of Schools of Construction of Southern
Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.
65