PAPER www.rsc.org/materials | Journal of Materials Chemistry
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Sydn
ey o
n 13
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 0
5 Ja
nuar
y 20
10 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B91
7695
KView Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
Self-assembled porphyrin microrods and observation of structure-inducediridescence†
Cicero Martelli,abc John Canning,*ab Tony Khoury,d Nina Skivesen,a Martin Kristensen,a George Huyang,bd
Paul Jensen,d Chiara Neto,d Tze Jing Sum,d Mads Bruun Hovgaard,a Brant C. Gibsone andMaxwell J. Crossley*d
Received 27th August 2009, Accepted 19th October 2009
First published as an Advance Article on the web 5th January 2010
DOI: 10.1039/b917695k
Self-assembled microrods {based on 5-nitro-10,15,20-trialkylporphyrins [(CnH2n+1)3-NO2P]} and
microplates {based on 5,10,15,20-tetraheptylporphyrin [(C7H15)4-P]} are fabricated and characterised
using optical microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
The length of the alkyl chains and the deposition surface are found to influence the optical
properties and microrod self-assembly. When the deposition surface is silica (a-quartz), 5-nitro-
trialkylporphyrins, (C5H11)3-NO2P, (C7H15)3-NO2P and (C11H23)3-NO2P all form microrods
of 0.7–0.8 micron diameter; the average length of the microrods varies from 170 microns for
(C5H11)3-NO2P to about 11 microns for (C7H15)3-NO2P and (C11H23)3-NO2P, whereas
(C19H39)3-NO2P with much longer alkyl chains only gives powders. Controlling the precipitation is
crucial in preventing the disordered aggregation of assembled layers observed in the bulk. Very
interestingly, the microrods formed from (C7H15)3-NO2P show marked iridescent character. When
(C7H15)3-NO2P is deposited on silicon, however, longer curved microrods which do not show
iridescence are produced. Single crystal X-ray crystallography of (C7H15)3-NO2P reveals the packing of
the bulk material which explains the packing topology of the layers observed by AFM but not the
iridescence. The observed structural colour of the (C7H15)3-NO2P microrods is explained by staggering
of the layers to produce a corrugated surface with a period of 125 nm, as measured by AFM.
Introduction
A commonly used approach to self-assemble porphyrin struc-
tures uses both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions of
porphyrins containing ionic substituents in aqueous solutions,1–3
as well as organic solvents.4 In these solutions, water soluble
porphyrins can be forced to aggregate by controlling the pH, the
ionic strength, and temperature.3–7 Without a supporting matrix,
H- or J-aggregates are formed, detected by the blue (H) or red (J)
shift of the exciton bands.6,8 Ionic self-assembly9 enables the
formation of porphyrin nanotubes in an aqueous solution.10–12
The expounded mechanism relied on electrostatic interactions
between two oppositely charged porphyrins [one with Sn(IV)],
which in addition to the van der Waals, hydrogen-bonding, axial
coordination and other weak intermolecular forces enhanced the
structural stability of the system. Tunnelling electron microscopy
(TEM) images showed these nanotubes to be hollow, microns in
length and between 50 and 70 nm in width. Fringe analysis,
aiNANO & Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus,DK-8000 �Arhus C, DenmarkbInterdisciplinary Photonics Laboratories, School of Chemistry, TheUniversity of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] de Engenharia Mecanica, Pontifıcia Universidade Cat�olicado Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22453-900, BrasildSchool of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaeQuantum Physics Victoria, School of Physics, The University ofMelbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
† CCDC reference number 742688. For crystallographic data in CIF orother electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/b917695k
2310 | J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2310–2316
together with spectrophotometer measurements, suggests that
these nanotubes are stacks of offset J-aggregated porphyrins
likely in the form of cylindrical lamellar sheets and X-ray
diffraction studies reveal moderate crystallinity. Studies in acid
were unable to rule out the role of water molecules. Another
important observation of porphyrin self-assembly was the
formation in alcohols of rod-like micelles on the nanoscale of
a cobalt(II) porphyrin.13 In this case, the structure is thought to be
in a reverse micellular arrangement of face-to-face aggregate
having a hydrophobic corona around a polar core. In addition to
ionic self-assembly, porphyrin thin films have been fabricated in
the holes of photonic crystal fibres, showing interaction between
the tin(IV) porphyrin and the silica of the fibres.14 Examples of
self-assembly based on topology packing in two and three
dimensions of porphyrins and related systems such as phthalo-
cyanines and corroles have also been reported.15,16
We report self-assembly studies of porphyrin arrays on
a-quartz and silicon and show that in nonaqueous solutions the
incorporation of a polar NO2 group transforms the planar 2-D
self-assembly of 5,10,15,20-tetraheptylporphyrin [(C7H15)4-P]
into 1-D microrods as 5-nitro-10,15,20-triheptylporphyrin
[(C7H15)3-NO2P]. These structures are characterised using
optical microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scan-
ning electron microscopy (SEM). The optical transparency
obtained with the microrods after drying suggests potential
photonic transport applications. The observed iridescence
reveals a lamellar period, suggesting novel optical functionality
exploiting these periodic structures is possible.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Sydn
ey o
n 13
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 0
5 Ja
nuar
y 20
10 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B91
7695
K
View Article Online
Experimental
Sample and surface preparation
a-Quartz slides were purchased from Starna Pty. Ltd. and their
surfaces were rinsed and ultrasonic cleaned in water for 15 min.
To increase hydroxy termination, the slides were heated to 70 �C
in basic piranha solution (ammonia–hydrogen peroxide–water at
1 : 1 : 5) for 5 min. After heating, the slides were rinsed in hot
water and dried under continuous nitrogen flow. Distilled water
was used in all processes. The porphyrins were dissolved in
dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) (0.1 mg mL�1) and subsequently
mixed with N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). Micro-droplets
(3 mL) of this mixture were deposited onto the cleaned quartz
slides with a secured calibrated micropipette.
Optical microscopy was carried out on an Olympus BX61
Motorised System Microscope. SEM was carried out using
a Nova 200 NanoLab (FEI Company) SEM/FIB. AFM imaging
was performed using a Veeco Multimode (Santa Barbara, CA) in
tapping mode.
Synthesis of 5-nitro-10,15,20-tripentylporphyrin [(C5H11)3-NO2P]
A solution of 5,10,15,20-tetrapentylporphyrin17 (300 mg, 0.508
mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (300 mL) and a solution of
nitrogen dioxide in light petroleum (1 M) was added portion-
wise with stirring until mono-nitration was complete. The
progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC analysis on
silica plates (light petroleum–CH2Cl2, 2 : 1) and upon comple-
tion, the reaction mixture was then evaporated to dryness and
the crude residue was further purified by column chromatog-
raphy over silica (light petroleum–CH2Cl, 2 : 1). The major dark
green band was recrystallised from CH2Cl2–methanol to afford
(C5H11)3-NO2P (59.8 mg, 20.8%) as a dark purple microcrys-
talline solid, mp 198–200 �C. Found: C, 74.9; H, 8.1; N, 11.4.
C35H43N5O2 requires C, 74.3; H, 7.7; N, 12.4%. (HR-ESI-FT/
ICR found: [M + H]+ 566.3493. C35H44N4NO2 requires
566.3490.) nmax (CHCl3)/cm�1 3317w (NH), 3022s, 2961s, 2930s,
2895s, 2872s, 2858s, 1558w, 1522m (NO2), 1506m, 1339m
(NO2), 1323m, 1283w, 1244w, 1163w, 1130w, 1103w; lmax
(CHCl3)/nm 308sh (log 3 4.12), 328sh (4.20), 370sh (4.47), 419
(5.26), 524 (4.02), 567 (3.91), 595 (3.78), 654 (3.75) nm;
d (400 MHz, CDCl3) �2.73 (2H, br s, inner NH), 0.96–1.02 (9H,
two overlapped t, ChH3), 1.50–1.56 (6H, m, CdH2), 1.71–1.77
(6H, m, CgH2), 2.39–2.44 (6H, m, CbH2), 4.68 (4H, t, J 8.1 Hz,
CaH2), 4.77 (2H, t, J 8.1 Hz, CaH2), 9.20 (2H, d, J 5.0 Hz,
b-pyrrolic H), 9.22 (2H, d, J 4.9 Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.32 (2H, d,
J 4.9 Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.34 (2H, d, J 5.0 Hz, b-pyrrolic H); m/z
(ESI) 566.5 ([M + H]+ requires 566.3).
Synthesis of 5-nitro-10,15,20-triheptylporphyrin [(C7H15)3-NO2P]
Treatment of (C7H15)4-P18 (0.300 g, 0.427 mmol) dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (300 mL) with nitrogen dioxide in light petroleum (1 M)
and work-up as above gave (C7H15)3-NO2P (29.6 mg, 10.7%) as
a dark purple microcrystalline solid (CH2Cl2–methanol), mp
108–110 �C. Found: C, 75.2; H, 9.3; N, 8.4. C41H55N5O2 requires
C, 75.6; H, 8.5; N, 10.8%. (HR-ESI-FT/ICR found: [M + H]+
650.4438. C41H56N5O2 requires 650.4429.) nmax (CHCl3)/cm�1
3317w (NH), 2955s, 2924s, 2854s, 1582w, 1520m (NO2), 1466m,
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
1366m (NO2), 1319m, 1288m, 1242w, 1126w; lmax (CHCl3)/nm
308sh (log 3 4.04), 328sh (4.13), 368sh (4.38), 419 (5.20), 524
(3.94), 567 (3.84), 594 (3.70), 655 (3.68); d (400 MHz, CDCl3)
�2.48 (2H, br s, inner NH), 0.89–0.94 (9H, two overlapped t,
ChH3), 1.34–1.40 (12H, m, C3H2 and CzH2), 1.52–1.57 (6H, m,
CdH2), 1.73–1.83 (6H, m, CgH2), 2.41–2.51 (6H, m, CbH2), 4.79
(4H, t, J 7.9 Hz, CaH2), 4.87 (2H, t, J 8.2 Hz, CaH2), 9.23 (2H, d,
J 5.0 Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.32 (2H, d, J 5.0 Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.41
(2H, d, J 3.2 Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.42 (2H, d, J 2.9 Hz, b-pyrrolic
H); m/z (ESI) 650.5 ([M + H]+ requires 650.4).
Synthesis of 5-nitro-10,15,20-triundecylporphyrin [(C11H23)3-NO2P]
Treatment of 5,10,15,20-tetraundecylporphyrin19,20 (300 mg,
0.323 mmol) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (300 mL) with nitrogen dioxide
in light petroleum (1 M) and work-up as above gave (C11H23)3-
NO2P (44.4 mg, 16.8%) as a dark purple microcrystalline solid
(CH2Cl2–methanol), mp 88–90 �C. (HR-ESI-FT/ICR found:
[M + H]+ 818.6314. C53H79N5O2 requires 818.6307.)
nmax (CHCl3)/cm�1 3319m (NH), 2957s, 2926s, 2854s, 1518m
(NO2), 1491w, 1468m, 1366w, 1340m (NO2), 1323m, 1246w,
1163m, 1107m; lmax (CHCl3)/nm 308sh (log 3 4.04), 328sh (4.11),
371sh (4.39), 419 (5.17), 524 (3.94), 566 (3.93), 595 (3.68), 655
(3.67); d (400 MHz, CDCl3) �2.42 (2H, br s, inner NH), 0.85–
0.89 (9H, two overlapped t, ChH3), 1.26–1.33 (36H, m, C3H2,
CzH2, ClH2, CqH2, CiH2 and CkH2), 1.47–1.53 (6H, m, CdH2),
1.74–1.88 (6H, m, CgH2), 2.42–2.50 (6H, m, CbH2), 4.83 (4H, t,
J 8.1 Hz, CaH2), 4.90 (2H, t, J 8.0 Hz, CaH2), 9.24 (2H, d, J 5.0
Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.37 (2H, d, J 4.9 Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.44
(2H, d, J 5.1 Hz, b-pyrrolic H), 9.46 (2H, d, J 4.9 Hz, b-pyrrolic
H); m/z (ESI) 818.7 ([M + H]+ requires 818.6).
Synthesis of 5-amino-10,15,20-triheptylporphyrin
[(C7H15)3-NH2P]
A solution of (C7H15)3-NO2P (10.0 mg, 0.0154 mmol) in a HCl–
ether mixture (4 M, 4 mL) was stirred with tin(II) chloride
dihydrate (36.0 mg, 0.160 mmol) in the dark for 2 h. The reaction
mixture was poured onto ice (10 g) and when the ice melted,
CH2Cl2 (100 mL) was added. The organic layer was washed with
water (50 mL), sodium carbonate solution (10%, 2 � 50 mL),
water (50 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and
the filtrate evaporated to dryness to give (C7H15)3-NH2P (9.0 mg,
94%) as a purple solid, mp > 300 �C. (HR-ESI-FT/ICR found:
[M + H]+ 620.4678. C41H58N5 requires 620.4687.) nmax (CHCl3)/
cm�1 3302w, 3202w, 3124w, 2955s, 2924s, 2854s, 1666w, 1574w,
1520m, 1466m, 1373w, 1350m, 1265m, 1095w, 1018w; lmax
(CHCl3)/nm 310sh (log 3 3.92), 420 (4.46), 426sh (4.45), 523sh
(3.54), 523sh (3.54), 594sh (3.37), 625 (3.21), 676 (3.19); aggre-
gation was obtained in 1H NMR spectrum and manifested as
broad resonances; m/z (ESI) 620.7 ([M + H]+ requires 620.5).
Results and discussion
The porphyrin that provided the most regular self-assembled
microrods on silica was the (C7H15)3-NO2P (Scheme 1), which
was prepared using nitro-dealkylation of the (C7H15)4-P,18
carried out by nitrogen dioxide in light petroleum solution.
Nitration was assumed to follow a similar mechanism to that
reported in the literature for nitration of nickel(II)
J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2310–2316 | 2311
Scheme 1 Synthesis of (C7H15)3-NO2P: (i) NO2–light petroleum,
CH2Cl2.
Fig. 1 X-Ray crystal structure of (C7H15)3-NO2P shown as an ORTEP
plot. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Fig. 2 Chemical structure of (C5H11)3-NO2P and (C11H23)3-NO2P.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Sydn
ey o
n 13
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 0
5 Ja
nuar
y 20
10 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B91
7695
K
View Article Online
tetrapropylporphyrin.21 An X-ray crystal structure of the
(C7H15)3-NO2P‡ was successfully obtained (Fig. 1). The nitro
group is canted relative to the nearly planar porphyrin ring. The
(C5H11)3-NO2P and (C11H23)3-NO2P counterparts were also
synthesised following the same method (Fig. 2).
Micro-droplets (3 mL) of each of the nitroporphyrins in
CH2Cl2–DMF solution were deposited onto the cleaned quartz
slides with a secured calibrated micropipette. After deposition,
the nitroporphyrin crystallised rapidly from CH2Cl2–DMF
solution as the CH2Cl2, in which nitroporphyrin is highly
soluble, evaporates at room temperature (CH2Cl2 bp ¼ 40 �C,
‡ Crystal structure data for (C7H15)3-NO2P: molecular formulaC41H55N5O2, M 649.90, triclinic, space group P�1(#2), a 10.485(2),b 12.451(2), c 15.458(2) A, a 94.241(4), b 96.867(4), g 95.615(4)�, V1986.4(6) A3, Dc 1.087 g cm�3, Z 2, crystal size 0.49 by 0.05 by0.02 mm, colour red, habit needle, temperature 150(2) K, l(MoKa)0.71073 A, m(MoKa) 0.067 mm�1, T(SADABS)min,max 0.853, 0.999,2qmax 50.92, hkl range �12 12, �14 14, �18 18, N 28 303, Nind
7138(Rmerge 0.0440), Nobs 4196(I > 2s(I)), Nvar 459, residuals* R1(F)0.0764, wR2(F2) 0.2594, GoF(all) 1.043, Drmin,max �0.390, 0.595 e A�3.
2312 | J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2310–2316
DMF bp ¼ 153 �C). The nitroporphyrins have low solubility in
DMF. The experiments were repeated using CH2Cl2 and
different DMF : CH2Cl2 ratios. Within the scope of these
experiments, the longest, straightest, and most crystal-like
microrods were obtained with equal solvent ratios.
When a droplet of 1 : 1 solution of (C7H15)3-NO2P is deposited
on a-quartz, molecules self-assemble into microrods (Fig. 3a and b),
through the alignment in two dimensions of the heptyl chains,
and staggering of aromatic regions, influenced by dipole-align-
ment arising from the dipoles created by having the NO2 group—
this is consistent with ionic self-assembly. Visual iridescence of
the (C7H15)3-NO2P solid after recrystallisation is very different to
the bulk solid form, which has a dark brown-red chemical col-
ouration characteristic of its absorption bands. These microrods
(diameter f > 500 nm, lengths > 10 mm, see below) are an order
of magnitude larger than natural occurring photonic crystals that
were reported in the literature.22,23 It is clear that the preparation
conditions are critical to the success of the self-assembled layer
formation. In contrast, under the same conditions, (C7H15)4-P
crystallises into 2-D microplates [area > (10 � 50) mm2]—Fig. 3e
and 7b. Although transparency is high, the original colour,
characteristic of the bulk starting material, is observed. No
evidence of structural colour is seen in the microplates. Reduc-
tion of the nitro group of (C7H15)3-NO2P gave (C7H15)3-NH2P
which did not form microrods under the same deposition
conditions. The NH2 group has no significant polar contribution.
This highlights the additional and essential role of electronic
dipole orientation to both alter the spectroscopy processes and
improve optical transparency and to guide the self-assembly
process.
When CH2Cl2 alone was used, less organised self-assembly of
the (C7H15)3-NO2P was observed in the form of clusters of
aggregated multiple self-assembled crystals which show less
iridescence since the clustering is disordered (Fig. 3c and d). This
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Fig. 3 (a) Optical micrograph of the (C7H15)3-NO2P microrods assembled on a-quartz; (b) observed iridescence of the (C7H15)3-NO2P microrods
deposited on a-quartz when white light is shone at an angle �45� to the surface; (c) optical micrograph of (C7H15)3-NO2P crystal cluster obtained by
crystallisation from CH2Cl2; (d) close up of shard from cluster shown in (c); (e) optical micrograph of the 2-D self-assembled microplates of (C7H15)4-P.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Sydn
ey o
n 13
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 0
5 Ja
nuar
y 20
10 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B91
7695
K
View Article Online
gives rise to the dark colouration. X-Ray crystal structure
packing of (C7H15)3-NO2P from a single shard of crystal (Fig. 4)
shows p–p interaction of each three porphyrin molecules where
the nitro groups are in one direction, followed by another three
packed porphyrins where the nitro groups are observed in the
opposite direction. This is the basic underlying structure in which
the unit porphyrin cells pack and is similar to thin film structures
using longer chains characterised by scanning tunnelling
microscopy (STM) and reported in the literature on ordered
graphite and Au surfaces.20,24 Those reports used STM to probe
the structure of films deposited, raising the possibility that
Fig. 4 X-Ray crystal structure packing of the (C7H15)3-NO2P as viewed appr
for the disordered heptyl chain. Colour code: green is carbon, blue is nitroge
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
attachment to an ordered substrate was critical for good
assembly. Our results suggest that such self-assembly is essen-
tially spontaneous, dependent only on molecular topology, with
the environment primarily affecting the quality and extent of
assembly. No attachment to a substrate is necessary. These
results also indicate that far more ordered aggregates are possible
under ideal precipitation conditions.
In contrast to the resonant enhanced scattering used to char-
acterise aggregates,25 the highly iridescent nature of the reflected
structural colours arises from multiple reflections. Such angle-
dependent colour is characteristic of diffraction associated with
oximately along the b-axis (with c horizontal). Only one position is shown
n, red is oxygen, hydrogens are not shown.
J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2310–2316 | 2313
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Sydn
ey o
n 13
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 0
5 Ja
nuar
y 20
10 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B91
7695
K
View Article Online
well defined, periodic layers, analogous to some natural organic
supra-structure colours26 (for example, deep iridescence of
butterfly wings,22,27 bird feathers,23 beetle’s exocuticles27 and
plants28). It can therefore provide further evidence of the layered
structure anticipated from X-ray diffraction. The �1.5 to 2 nm
separation of porphyrin chains shown in the X-ray diffraction is
too small to explain the iridescence alone. It is thus likely that
sheets of these chained layers with a greater period are respon-
sible for the iridescent colour.
AFM images of the microrods reveal a layered (2 nm) surface
with a staggered period of 125 nm (Fig. 5a and b). The 2 nm
period of the layers is consistent with the 2 nm structure revealed
by X-ray scattering (Fig. 4). This suggests that the microrod
structure arises from a staggered configuration of layered sheets
extending along the microrods. The out-of-plane curvature is
introduced by the strain arising from dipole orientation and is
offset between nitro groups, where the dipoles are oriented
opposite to each other. The striking, iridescent structural colour
is consistent with scattering from a multilayer structure or
corrugated surface with such a period and is readily interpreted
from Bragg analysis. From the AFM results, these multiple
interference, Bragg-like, effects are due to the layers with
an approximate period, L z 125 nm. A green iridescence,
l z 530 nm, is observed at an angle of q z 45� to the incident
white light. If the incident light is assumed to be orthogonal to
the plane of the layers making up the microrods, the refractive
index, n, of the layers can be estimated from:
n ¼ (l sin q)/(m2L) (1)
For a first order grating where m ¼ 1, the refractive index is
calculated to be �1.5, typical for these organic systems.29 The
angular spectral separation, along with the likelihood of only
a few layers (since the diameter of the microrods is �1 mm),
indicates a gap between layers giving strong index contrast. If the
structure is a shell around a central region, it is likely that there
are contributions by multiple interference reflections from both
sides, and some resonance enhanced scattering should be
observable.
The role of the substrate was also explored by depositing
microrods on silicon (Si) and silica (SiO2, a-quartz), key opto-
electronic materials. The Si thermal oxide layer has a different
Fig. 5 (a) AFM image of the edge of a (C7H15)3-NO2P microrod
showing the layered structure; and (b) cross-section of this AFM image.
2314 | J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2310–2316
distribution of surface point defects than the quartz slide.30 Any
assembly based on dipole alignment may differ to that observed
on quartz. Common to both, the best self-assembly process was
observed when using 1 : 1 (DMF : CH2Cl2) co-precipitation.
Fig. 6a and b show the optical and AFM images of the
microrods generated on the Si substrate. No crystal-like struc-
tures were observed, with the little amount of colour accounted
by simple thin film scattering or some resonance enhanced
scattering. The AFM results (Fig. 6b) show a smooth surface
with no periodic features on the scale required, explaining the
absence of iridescence. This is further evidence that the surface
corrugation with period 125 nm is responsible for the observed
iridescence. SEM imaging of this sample further confirmed the
ultra smooth nature of the surface (Fig. 7a). The SEM image of
(C7H15)4-P microplates showed the surface to be similarly ultra
smooth (Fig. 7b) and again these are not iridescent. The differ-
ence between substrates indicates that substrate surface proper-
ties may play a role in determining the formation of the staggered
periodic structure.
Microrod formation with porphyrins with varying hydro-
carbon chain length [(C5H11)3-NO2P, (C7H15)3-NO2P and
(C11H23)3-NO2P] was evaluated more closely. The strongest
iridescence was always observed with the heptyl chains, indi-
cating that whilst ionic self-assembly drives the porphyrin
microrods formation, the regularity and uniformity of the
structures (at least in terms of the corrugated surface) require an
optimal hydrocarbon length for the conditions found. Microrods
which have precipitated in the centre of the deposited drop after
evaporation have been measured for each compound. (C5H11)3-
NO2P microrods have a similar width and iridescence compared
to the (C7H15)3-NO2P, but a much larger distribution length
(10–250 mm). In contrast, (C11H23)3-NO2P microrods have the
Fig. 6 (a) Optical micrograph of the (C7H15)3-NO2P microrods assem-
bled on a Si surface; (b) AFM image of the (C7H15)3-NO2P microrods.
Fig. 7 (a) SEM image of a single (C7H15)3-NO2P microrod; (b) SEM
image of sheets of (C7H15)4-P.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Fig. 8 (a) Optical micrograph of the (C5H11)3-NO2P microrods
assembled on a-quartz; (b) optical micrograph of the (C11H23)3-NO2P
microrods assembled on a-quartz.
Table 1 Distribution of the (C5H11)3-NO2P, (C7H15)3-NO2P and(C11H23)3-NO2P microrods lengths measured in the centre of a droplet.(C19H39)3-NO2P did not form microrods
SampleAve.length/mm
Std.dev./mm
Ave.width/mm
Std.dev./mm
Length/widthratio
(C5H11)3-NO2P 169 81.0 0.81 0.11 208.6(C7H15)3-NO2P 10.8 3.6 0.67 0.12 16.1(C11H23)3-NO2P 11.1 3.5 0.69 0.18 16.1
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Sydn
ey o
n 13
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 0
5 Ja
nuar
y 20
10 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B91
7695
K
View Article Online
same size range as the (C7H15)3-NO2P, but show very little
iridescence (Fig. 8). These may be better structures for optical
transport where diffractive effects need to be avoided. Beyond
this chain length no iridescence is observed. The compound
(C19H39)3-NO2P with much longer alkyl chains did not show
microrod formation. Table 1 summarises the average lengths of
each microrod family, all measured optically.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have formed porphyrin-based microrods which
are an order of magnitude larger than those previously reported,
up scaling self-assembly into the micron domain. By tailoring
the polarity of the end group we have fabricated porphyrin
2-D microplates from (C7H15)4-P and microrods from
(C7H15)3-NO2P consistent with ionic self-assembly of the
microrods. In addition to comparison with previous work,
a variety of methods were used to characterise the microrods,
including optical microscopy, optical and X-ray diffraction
analysis, AFM, and SEM. These measurements permitted
quantification of some of the optical properties associated with
well organised stacked layers and the resulting corrugated
surface. The optical transparency of the microrods on a-quartz
suggests that such individual structures could form the basis of
photonic microrods and other device components (including
periodic structures). Additionally, the ability to either remove or
add iridescence through such structures adds a new level of
optical shaping and control of supramolecular structures for
both passive and active applications. These can eventually be
integrated onto silicon (or other material) photonic circuits or
within silica optical fibres. We note the potential role of such
microrods, with novel surface control, in enhancing photovoltaic
applications. 5,10,15,20-Tetraarylporphyrins and the octa-
substituted porphyrins related to haem have been the subject of
many thousands of reports and have found many uses. Previ-
ously, very little attention has been directed at the chemistry,
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
properties and applications of 5,10,15,20-tetraalkylporphyrins
and their derivatives. The self-assembly properties of this class of
porphyrins demonstrated in this study and their propensity to
form highly ordered monolayers on surfaces20,24 suggest that
they will also prove to be very useful in a variety of emerging
technologies.
Acknowledgements
C. Martelli acknowledges travel funding from the Australian
Research Council (ARC) Networks ARNAM and ACORN,
and funding from a Denmark–Japan NEDO project grant
(Kristensen). J. Canning acknowledges a Villum Kann Ras-
mussen Professorship during time at iNANO in Denmark.
Australian Research Council project grants (DP0770692,
DP0879465—Canning), DIISR-ISL project grant (CG130013—
Canning, Crossley) are acknowledged for providing various
funding on this project. N. Skivesen acknowledges a Carlsberg
Fellowship. G. Huyang acknowledges a studentship funding
from Canning and Crossley.
Notes and references
1 J. M. Ribo, J. Crusats, F. Sague, J. Claret and R. Rubires, Science,2001, 292, 2063.
2 M. de Napoli, S. Nardis, R. Paolesse, M. G. H. Vicente, R. Lauceriand R. Purrello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5934.
3 L. M. Scolaro, A. Romeo, M. A. Castriciano and N. Micali, Chem.Commun., 2005, 3018.
4 G. de Luca, A. Romeo and L. M. Scolaro, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005,109, 7149.
5 T. S. Balaban, A. D. Bhise, M. Fischer, M. Linke-Schaetzel,C. Roussel and N. Vanthuyne, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2140.
6 R. F. Pasternak, C. Bustamante, P. J. Collings, A. Gianetto andE. J. Gibbs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 5393.
7 W. I. White, in The Porphyrins Handbook, ed. D. Dolphin, AcademicPress, New York, 1978, vol. V, p. 303.
8 E. G. McRae and M. J. Kasha, J. Chem. Phys., 1958, 28, 721.9 C. F. J. Faul and M. Antonietti, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 673.
10 A. D. Schwab, D. E. Smith, C. S. Rich, E. R. Young, W. F. Smith andJ. C. de Paula, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 11339.
11 Z. Wang, C. J. Medforth and J. A. Shelnutt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004,126, 15954.
12 K. Hosomizu, M. Oodoi, T. Umeyama, Y. Matano, K. Yoshida,S. Isoda, M. Isosomppi, N. V. Tkachenko, H. Lemmetyinen andH. Imahori, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 16517.
13 M. Yasuda, K. Oyaizu, A. Yamagachi and M. Kuwakado, J. Am.Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 11128.
14 C. Martelli, J. Canning, J. R. Reimers, M. Sintic, D. Stocks,T. Khoury and M. J. Crossley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 2925.
15 J. A. A. W. Elemans, R. Van Hameren, R. J. M. Nolte andA. E. Rowan, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 1251.
16 R. Van Hameren, J. A. A. W. Elemans, D. Wyrostek, M. Tasior,D. T. Gryko, A. E. Rowan and R. J. M. Nolte, J. Mater. Chem.,2009, 19, 66.
17 J. S. Lindsey, I. C. Schreiman, H. C. Hsu, P. C. Kearney andA. M. Marguerettaz, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52, 827.
18 M. J. Crossley, P. Thordarson, J. P. Bannerman and P. J. Maynard,J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines, 1998, 2, 511.
19 M. A. Fox, J. V. Grant, D. Melamed, T. Torimoto, C. Y. Liu andA. J. Bard, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10, 1771.
20 B. Hulsken, R. van Hameren, J. W. Gerritsen, T. Khoury,P. Thordarson, M. J. Crossley, A. E. Rowan, R. J. M. Nolte,J. A. A. W. Elements and S. Speller, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 285.
21 O. Siri, L. Jaquinod and K. M. Smith, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41,3583.
22 P. Vukusic and I. Hooper, Science, 2005, 310, 1151.23 J. Zi, X. Yu, Y. Li, X. Hu, C. Xu, X. Wang, X. Liu and R. Fu, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2003, 100, 12576.
J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2310–2316 | 2315
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Sydn
ey o
n 13
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 0
5 Ja
nuar
y 20
10 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B91
7695
K
View Article Online
24 B. Hulsken, R. van Hameren, P. Thordarson, J. W. Gerritsen,R. J. M. Nolte, A. E. Rowan, M. J. Crossley, A. A. W. Elemensand S. Speller, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2006, 45, 1953.
25 R. F. Pasterneck and P. J. Collings, Science, 1995, 269, 935.26 S. M. Doucet and M. G. Meadows, J. R. Soc. Interface, 2009, 6, S115.27 K. Michielsen and D. G. Stavenga, J. R. Soc. Interface, 2008, 5, 85.28 P. Vukusic, Phys. World, 2004, 17, 35.
2316 | J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2310–2316
29 M. M€uller, R. Zentel, T. Maka, S. G. Romanov and C. M. SotomayorTorres, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 1499.
30 S. P. Karma, H. A. Kurtz, A. C. Pineda, W. M. Shedd andR. D. Pugh, in Defects in SiO2 and Related Dielectrics: Science andTechnology, ed. G. Pacchioni, L. Skuja and D. L. Grissom, NATOScience Series II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000,p. 599.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010