Date post: | 15-Nov-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 30(1): 64-69, 1999
Copyright 1999 by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians
SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA IN DESERT TORTOISES
(GOPHERUS AGASSIZII)
Matthew B. Rooney, D.V.M., Gregg Levine, D.V.M., James Gaynor, D.V.M., M.S., Ellen
Macdonald, D.V.M., and Jeffrey Wimsatt, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Abstract: The effects of sevoflurane on anesthesia induction, recovery, ventricular pressures, heart rate, ventricular
pH, blood gas values, and electrolytes were evaluated in desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii). Tortoises were orotra
cheally intubated while awake and ventilated manually with 3-7% sevoflurane in oxygen (1 L/min) to achieve desired
expired sevoflurane concentrations. Data, consisting of induction time, recovery time, systolic, diastolic, and mean
ventricular pressures, heart rate, ventricular pH, blood gas values, and electrolytes, were collected prior to anesthesia
and sequentially at 2.50% and 3.75% expired sevoflurane as measured at the junction of the endotracheal tube and the
breathing circuit. Blood pressure was measured and blood samples were collected through a 25-ga needle passed through a cardiac access port that was placed while the tortoises were in dorsal recumbency. Mean (?SE) induction time was
2.55 ? 0.55 min, recovery time was 27.58 ? 7.55 min, and duration of anesthesia was 105 ? 12 min. Mean (?SD)
values for systolic, diastolic, and mean ventricular pressures in awake tortoises were 28 ? 3 mm Hg, 22 ? 2 mm Hg, and 24 ? 2 mm Hg, respectively. Sevoflurane (2.5% expired) significantly decreased systolic (14 ? 3 mm Hg), diastolic
(12 ? 1 mm Hg), and mean (13 zt 1 mm Hg) ventricular pressures compared with those of awake tortoises. Ventricular
pressures did not decrease further with increasing depth of anesthesia. Heart rate (32 ? 4 beats/min) did not change
significantly under sevoflurane anesthesia. Sevoflurane administration increased ventricular Po2 but did not change Na+,
K+, or iCa++ concentrations. Sevoflurane appears to provide safe and effective anesthesia with rapid induction and
recovery.
Key words: Desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, sevoflurane, blood gas, ventricular blood pressure, chelonians.
INTRODUCTION
Chelonian anesthesia is challenging. Anesthetic
agents have been injected intramuscularly, intrave
nously, and intracoelomically. Ketamine,430 succi
nylcholine,25 midazolam,4 24
sodium pentobarbital,30
tiletamine/zolazepam,25 alfaxolone/alfadolone ace
tate,25 ketamine/xylazine,13 and ketamine/midazo
lam13 have been successfully used for anesthesia,
sedation, and chemical restraint. However, lack of
safety of some injectable anesthetics in reptiles and
extremely long recovery times has limited their
use 13,24,30 other potential problems with injectables
include renal toxicity,12 variable individual and spe
cies sensitivities,24 unpredictable absorption and
metabolism, and inconsistent depth of anesthesia.
Halothane and isoflurane may substantially
shorten induction and recovery times19 in cheloni
ans and permit better control over anesthesia, which
should lead to greater survival in normal and de
bilitated individuals. Chelonians can hold their
breath and utilize anaerobic metabolism for extend
ed periods,1 which complicates gas delivery, but en
dotracheal intubation and intermittent positive pres
sure ventilation help to minimize this problem.19
Sevoflurane's low blood-gas solubility coefficient
permits rapid, uneventful induction, recovery, and
changes in anesthesia depth.15 Sevoflurane also has
little effect on tissue perfusion with oxygenated
blood at clinical doses, as has been demonstrated
in several species.218 For these reasons, sevoflurane
may be a safe and effective anesthetic for exotic
species. In this study, we determined the effects of
sevoflurane on induction, recovery, ventricular
pressures, heart rate, ventricular pH, blood gas val
ues, and electrolytes in desert tortoises (Gopherus
agassizii).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Six captive desert tortoises, including four males
and two females weighing 1.29-4.49 kg, were ran
domly selected from a colony housed at Colorado
State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. They were
maintained on a 12 hr:12 hr light:dark cycle, fed
grass hay and remainder grocery greens, and given
water ad lib. All individuals were Mycoplasma
agassizii positive, as determined by an enzyme
linked immunosorbent assay, but only those ani
mals that maintained body weight and were without
clinical disease were included in this study.
At least 1 mo prior to the study, rubber cardiac
ports were implanted into the plastron, providing
needle access to the heart for ventricular blood
pressure determination and sampling of blood for
pH, blood gas, and electrolyte analyses. To place
the ports, tortoises were intubated, and anesthesia
was induced and maintained with isoflurane. Tor
toises were placed in dorsal recumbency and the
From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of
Veterinary Medicine and Biom?dical Sciences, Colorado
State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
64
This content downloaded from 157.182.94.224 on Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:14:35 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ROONEY ET AL.?SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA IN DESERT TORTOISES 65
plastron was aseptically prepared for surgery. A
sterile 8.46-mm stainless steel drill bit and cordless
drill were used to create a perpendicular hole
through the plastron in the midline at the junction of the humeral and pectoral scutes. The underlying
periosteal and coelomic membranes were incised.
A sterile rubber top from a 3-ml blood collection
tube (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Rutherford,
New Jersey 07070, USA), trimmed to the same
thickness as the plastron, was inserted snugly and
sealed in place with 5-min epoxy (Duro, Loctite
Co., Cleveland, Ohio 44128, USA). Once the epoxy
was hard, anesthesia was discontinued and the tor
toise was returned to its enclosure.
At least 1 mo after port implantation, each tor
toise was intubated while awake, connected to a
Bain nonrebreathing circuit, and administered sev
oflurane (Ultane, Abbott Laboratories, N. Chicago,
Illinois 60064, USA) in 02 (1 L/min) using a sev
oflurane-specific vaporizer (Ohmeda Sevotech,
Louisville, Colorado 80027, USA). Anesthesia was
induced with 5% sevoflurane in oxygen (1 L/min)
by manual ventilation every 10 sec, with a peak
inspiratory pressure of 12 cm H20, until head and
limb flaccidity and loss of righting reflexes were
observed. Tortoises were checked for the ability to
right themselves every 20 sec. Induction time was
recorded. Once anesthesia was induced, each tor
toise was placed in dorsal recumbency and venti
lated 3 times/min throughout the anesthesia period.4
From induction through recovery, body temperature was maintained with a circulating-water heating
blanket and heat lamp.
Systolic, diastolic, and mean ventricular pres sures and heart rate were measured, and blood sam
ples for electrolyte, pH, and blood gas determina
tion were collected at three different times from
each tortoise, once while awake and at two different
planes of anesthesia. For each data collection event,
each tortoise was placed in dorsal recumbency and
its cardiac access port was surgically prepared with
chlorhexidine and alcohol. A 25-ga 3.75-cm needle
was inserted through the cardiac port in the plastron until blood was seen in the needle hub. Saline-filled
tubing (Extension set No. 4481, Abbott Laborato
ries) connected the needle to a pressure transducer
(CDXPress 041-572-504A, Argon, Athens, Texas
75751, USA) that was zeroed at the level of the heart. The needle was positioned until a peak pres sure value was obtained. Systolic, diastolic, and
mean ventricular pressures were measured (Life
scope 6, Nihon Kohden America, Irvine, California
92714, USA). Blood samples (1.5 ml) for electro
lyte and blood gas determinations were collected in
3-ml heparinized polyethylene syringes and evalu
ated using a portable analyzer (IRMA, Diametrics
Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota 55113, USA) within 1 min of collection. The needle was then removed
from the access port. Heart rate was recorded using
Doppler ultrasonic flow detection (Model 811,
Parks Medical Electronics, Aloha, Oregon 97007,
USA) applied through the thoracic inlet. Expired sevoflurane concentration, sampled from the junc
tion of the endotracheal tube and the breathing cir
cuit, was determined using a quartz crystal anes
thetic agent monitor (Model 9100, Biochemical In
ternational, Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188-1199,
USA). After each data collection episode, each tor
toise was returned to sternal recumbency.
Vaporizer settings were adjusted so that the ex
pired concentration of sevoflurane was 2.50% ?
0.05% for the first phase of the study. Each animal
was maintained at this level for at least 10 min prior to data collection. The vaporizer setting was then
increased to achieve an expired sevoflurane con
centration of 3.75% ? 0.05%. After another 10
min, data were collected again. Sevoflurane con
centration was then reduced to 0%, and 1 L/min 02 was administered for 20 min. The tortoise was ven
tilated 3 times/min for 10 min, then 1 time/min for an additional 10 min. The tortoise was then discon
nected from the anesthesia machine and ventilated
with room air 1 time/min. The animals were extu
bated when at least 30 sec of continual locomotion
indicated recovery. No fluids were administered
during anesthesia.
The significance and magnitude of tortoise gen
der and sevoflurane dose potentially influencing re
sponse variables were analyzed with mixed model,
least squares analysis of variance, for repeated mea
sures with unequally spaced treatment levels.17 The
significance of the differences between the means
of each dose were evaluated by linear contrast. A
value of P <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Results are reported in Tables 1 and 2. Gender
was not significantly related to changes in any mea
sured variable. Tortoises weighed 2.4 ? 0.5 kg (x ? SE). Mean induction and recovery times were
2.51 ? 0.55 min and 27.35 ? 7.33 min, respec
tively. Mean duration of anesthesia was 105 ? 12
min. Mean heart rate, Na+, K+, and iCa++ did not
significantly change during anesthesia (Table 1).
All individuals maintained cloacal temperatures be
tween 25.0?C and 28.5?C.
Sevoflurane anesthesia significantly influenced
systolic ventricular pressure, diastolic ventricular
pressure, and mean ventricular pressure (Fig. 1).
All ventricular pressure mean values significantly
This content downloaded from 157.182.94.224 on Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:14:35 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
66 JOURNAL OF ZOO AND WILDLIFE MEDICINE
Table 1. Mean (?SE) heart rate and electrolyte values in awake and anesthetized desert tortoises.
Heart rate Status (beats/min) Na+ (mEq/L) K+ (mEq/L) iCa++ (mEq/L)
Awake 34 ? 4 146 ? 3 4.3 ? 0.2 6.29 ? 0.39
2.5% expired sevoflurane 38 ? 3 147 ? 3 4.9 ? 0.2 5.66 ? 0.39
3.75% expired sevoflurane 33 ? 3 147 ? 3 4.7 ? 0.2 5.62 ? 0.39
decreased with anesthesia, as compared with base
line values (P <0.001). There were no significant
differences in ventricular pressure mean values be
tween the two planes of sevoflurane anesthesia.
Ventricular partial pressure of oxygen (Po2), ven
tricular partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco2),
and blood pH were significantly influenced by sev
oflurane administered in 100% 02, but acid-base
excess (ABE) did not change (Table 2). Levels of
Po2 and pH increased whereas Pco2 levels de
creased as compared with awake values. There
were no significant differences in mean values for
pH, Po2, and Pco2 between the two planes of sev
oflurane anesthesia.
DISCUSSION
The induction time of sevoflurane anesthesia for
tortoises in this study was shorter than that of any
other inhalant anesthetic used in chelonians. Induc
tion time in this study could have been shortened
by increasing either the rate of manual ventilation
or the delivered sevoflurane concentration. An is
oflurane induction time, defined as cessation of
movement and a slowed palpebral reflex, of 7 ? 1
min (x ? SE) for Kemp's Ridley sea turtles (Lepi dochelys kempi) was reported using intermittent
positive pressure ventilation.19 Induction times of
20-50 min by mask induction in green sea turtles
(Chelonia mydas) using isoflurane also have been
reported.27 Using an open-drop method, kinosternid
turtles reached a surgical plane of anesthesia with
halothane within 11-35 min, but attempts to anes
thetize certain other species of turtles using a hal
othane open-drop method were unsuccessful.6
The mean recovery time of 27.35 ? 7.33 min in
this study was shorter than times reported in other
chelonians using other anesthetic agents. Green sea
turtles recovered from 92-452 min of isoflurane an
esthesia in 241 ? 31 min.19 Recovery was defined
as when they no longer tolerated the endotracheal
tube or were awake. It is unknown if species and
habitat of origin (desert vs. aquatic) play a role in
rate of recovery. The lower blood-gas solubility co
efficient of sevoflurane as compared with isoflurane
(0.68 vs. 1.38)15 may have conferred the properties of rapid induction, recovery, and change in depth of anesthesia, as occurs with anesthetic agents used
for humans and other mammals.15 The tortoises
were anesthetized for 105 ? 12 min. With increas
ing duration of anesthesia, recovery would proba
bly be prolonged as more anesthetic dissolved in
the tissues. The recovery protocol of ventilating
each tortoise 3 times/min on 100% 02 for 10 min allowed for rapid removal of sevoflurane. To allow
the Pco2 to increase and stimulate spontaneous
breathing, ventilation was decreased to 1 time/min.
We also used a strictly defined criterion of 30 sec of spontaneous movement for recovery to be as
sumed.
The awake heart rates in these tortoises were
slower than those reported in awake green sea tur
tles.19 Heart rates did not significantly change be
tween the awake and anesthetized states, compared with a 56% decrease in heart-rate reported in green
sea turtles under isoflurane.19 Heart rates for desert
tortoises anesthetized with other agents are un
known. Heart rate may be an insensitive measure
of anesthetic level in desert tortoises.
Although the pulse pressures measured in this
study were small, normal pressures in tortoises
have not been reported. Needle position could have
affected the measurements. If the needle had been
Table 2. Mean (?SE) pH and blood gas values in awake and anesthetized desert tortoises. ABE = acid-base
excess.
Status pH Pco2 (mm Hg) Po2 (mm Hg) ABE (mEq/L)
Awake 7.38 ? 0.05 43.8 ? 3.2 53.5 ? 16.8 0.17 ? 1.3
2.5% expired sevoflurane 7.50 ? 0.05a 33.3 ? 3.2a 99.5 ? 16.8a 2.8 ? 1.4
3.75% expired sevoflurane 7.57 ? 0.05a 24.0 ? 3.2a 112.3 ? 16.8a 1.1 ? 1.4
a Significantly different from awake values (P < 0.001).
This content downloaded from 157.182.94.224 on Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:14:35 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ROONEY ET AL?SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA IN DESERT TORTOISES 67
30H
O) I E E
W CO
o
20
? 10 c o
>
- ? SVP(mmHg)
-*? DVP(mmHg) - ?
MVP(mmHg)
Awake 2.5% Expired Sevoflurane
3.75% Expired Sevoflurane
Period of Data Collection
Figure 1. Systolic ventricular pressure (SVP), diastolic ventricular pressure (DVP), and mean ventricular pressure
(MVP) in desert tortoises. Data are expressed as x ? SE. * Significantly different from awake for all three pressures
measurements.
against a chamber wall, pulse pressure would be
artifactually decreased. Systolic, diastolic, and
mean ventricular pressures decreased from the
awake values as they did in anesthetized green sea
turtles.19 The decreased ventricular pressure in sev
oflurane-anesthetized tortoises was likely due to pe
ripheral vasodilation and to a lesser degree to
slightly decreased cardiac output, based on data
from dogs and humans.21822 Pressures did not
change from one plane of anesthesia to the next,
implying that vasodilation did not increase with
depth of anesthesia, which is consistent with find
ings in dogs anesthetized with sevoflurane.3 All
data, including that from awake animals, were col
lected with the animals in dorsal recumbency.
Therefore, positional effects on pressure readings should have been eliminated. In awake green turtles
cardiac output appears to be heart rate dependent, whereas blood pressure is heart rate independent.7 If cardiac output is predominately determined by heart rate in anesthetized desert tortoises, the find
ings that heart rate did not change with varying levels of anesthesia might indicate that cardiac out
put was minimally affected even though the blood
pressures decreased. There is no evidence that per
fusion changed significantly, based on insignificant
changes in ABE (Table 2). More information on chelonian cardiac output is needed.
The needles were placed into the heart through the plastron port blindly into either of the two atria
or the single ventricle. Based on the pressure
changes, presumably the needle was placed in the
ventricle. Ventricular, but not atrial, pressures in
mammals with four-chamber hearts decrease sig
nificantly with anesthesia.112228 Given the small
amount of variability in the pressure data from 18
cardiac punctures in six tortoises, the cardiac nee
dles were probably positioned in similar locations
in all individuals.
The values for Po2, Pco2, and pH in these tor
toises resemble those in unanesthetized green tur
tles,7 suggesting arterial sampling. Ventricular sam
pling in green-eared sliders by similar techniques resulted in blood gas values indicative of slight ve
nous mixing as compared with results obtained us
ing carotid sampling.14 The lower Po2 in desert tor
toises is most likely an effect of elevation; the study was performed at approximately 1,500 above sea
This content downloaded from 157.182.94.224 on Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:14:35 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
68 JOURNAL OF ZOO AND WILDLIFE MEDICINE
level.29 The Pco2 may be slightly higher from hy
po ventilation due to dorsal recumbency. Both the
lower Po2 and higher Pco2 could also be due to
venous mixture in the ventricle. This increased Pco2
would explain a slightly lower pH and may be a
reason for a slightly lower Po2.
Changes in blood gas values during anesthesia
are explained by changes in inspired oxygen con
centration and manual ventilation. Awake values
were determined while the tortoises were breathing
21% oxygen, whereas anesthetized values were de
termined with virtually 100% inspired 02. Tortoises were ventilated approximately 3 times/min during anesthesia. Variability in frequency of ventilation
and peak inspiratory pressure are most likely re
sponsible for the respiratory alkalosis that occurred
during anesthesia. The lack of a significant change
in ABE indicates there is no metabolic component
to the changes in acid-base status.
Values for Na+ and K+ determined in this study are consistent with published values. Lithium hep
arin should be used as an anticoagulant when mea
suring Na+, but sodium heparin was used in this
study. Nonetheless, any additional Na+ would have
been consistent in all samples throughout the study.
Normal iCa++ values in desert tortoises are un
known.
Expired sevoflurane was sampled from the junc
tion of the endotracheal tube and breathing circuit.
Because of the high oxygen flow rates through the
Bain circuit and the small tidal volumes, the mea
sured expired sevoflurane values were likely lower
than true expired or alveolar sevoflurane concentra
tions. Nonetheless, the relative changes are proba
bly consistent. If expired C02 had been measured,
the gradient between expired and ventricular C02
could have been used to help determine alveolar
sevoflurane concentrations. The expired sevoflurane
concentrations of 2.5% and 3.75% are slightly
higher than the values for 1.0 and 1.5 mean alveolar
concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in mammals.26
Surgical planes of anesthesia are associated with
alveolar concentrations equivalent to approximately
1.25-1.5 MAC.21 Although the true alveolar con
centrations are probably higher than the measured
expired concentrations, it is unknown whether these
tortoises would have tolerated surgical stimulation.
With all individuals, the cloacal temperature was
assumed to be lower than the core body tempera
ture because of the anesthetic-induced relaxation of
the cloacal vent musculature, allowing ambient
room air to enter the cloaca. An esophageal tem
perature probe might be more accurate. However,
the cloacal temperature readings fall within the
lower limits of the preferred optimal temperature zone of tortoises, which is 26-38? C.1
One concern with sevoflurane use is the toxicity of Compound A (pentafluorisopropenyl fluorome
thyl ether), which is formed when sevoflurane in
teracts with C02 absorbent in closed-circuit circle
anesthesia systems. Compound A in these systems
may reach concentrations of 30-40 ppm.5 Signifi
cantly higher concentrations of Compound A are
associated with renal toxicity and death in rats.1020
To date, no clinical toxicity has been documented
in humans anesthetized with sevoflurane in low
flow circuits,9 but the manufacturer currently rec
ommends a minimum 02 flow rate of 2 L/min when
using rebreathing anesthesia circuits. The risk of
toxicity to desert tortoises and other reptiles from
Compound A is unknown but was not an issue for
this study because sevoflurane was delivered
through a nonrebreathing circuit, which uses no
C02 absorbent.
Another concern with sevoflurane, isoflurane,
and all halogenated ether anesthetics is nephrotox
icity from inorganic fluoride ions (F~). Compared with methoxyflurane, which has induced clinically significant renal disease in humans and rats, sevo
flurane and isoflurane undergo minimal intrarenal
defluorination. Nephrotoxicity is unlikely with these agents despite elevated plasma F~ levels.16
Sevoflurane-induced nephrotoxicity has not been
reported in healthy humans,23 nor has sevoflurane
exacerbated preexisting renal disease in humans.8
The degree of F~ toxicity in chelonians is unknown,
but the tortoises in this study were clinically
healthy 8 mo after anesthesia.
CONCLUSION
Sevoflurane provides rapid, controllable, and re
liable induction of anesthesia and recovery in desert
tortoises. The anesthesia period is characterized by
decreases in systolic, diastolic, and mean ventric
ular pressures but not in heart rate or Na+, K+, and
iCa++ blood concentrations.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Bennett, R. A. 1996. Anesthesia in reptiles. In:
Mader, D. (ed.). Reptile Medicine and Surgery. WB Saun
ders Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Pp. 241-247.
2. Bernard, J. M., M. F. Doursout, P. Wouters, C. J.
Hartley, R. G. Merin, and J. E. Chelly. 1992. Effects of
sevoflurane and isoflurane on hepatic circulation in the
chronically instrumented dog. Anesthesiology 77: 541
545.
3. Bernard, J. M., P. F. Wouters, M. F. Doursout, B.
Florence, J. E. Chelly, and R. G. Merin. 1990. Effects of
sevoflurane and isoflurane on cardiac and coronary dy
This content downloaded from 157.182.94.224 on Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:14:35 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ROONEY ET AL.?SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA IN DESERT TORTOISES 69
namics in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesthesiology 72: 659-662.
4. Bienzle, D., and C. J. Boyd. 1992. Sedative effects
of ketamine and midazolam in snapping turtles (Chelydra
serpentina). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 23: 201-204.
5. Bito, H., and K. Ikeda. 1994. Long-duration, low
flow sevoflurane anesthesia using two carbon dioxide ab
sorbents: quantification of degradation products in the cir
cuit. Anesthesiology 81: 340-345.
6. Brannian, R., C. Kirk, and D. Williams. 1987. An
esthetic induction of kinosternid turtles with halothane. J.
Zoo Wildl. Med. 18: 115-117.
7. Butler, P. J., W. Milsom, and J. Woakes. 1984. Re
spiratory, cardiovascular and metabolic adjustments dur
ing steady-state swimming in the green turtle, Chelonien
mydas. J. Comp. Physiol. 154: 167-174.
8. Conzen, P. F, M. Nuscheler, A. Melotte, M. Ver
haegan, T. Leupolt, H. Van Aken, and K. Peter. 1995.
Renal function and serum fluoride concentrations in pa tients with stable renal insufficiency after anesthesia with
sevoflurane or enflurane. Anesth Analg 81: 569-575.
9. Eger, E. I., II. 1994. New inhaled anesthetics. An
esthesiology 80: 906-922.
10. Gonsowski, C. T, M. J. Laster, E. I. Eger II, M. D.
Ferrell, and R. L. Kerschman. 1994. Toxicity of Com
pound A in rats. Effect of a 3 hour administration. An
esthesiology 80: 556-565.
11. Grosenbaugh, D. A., and W W Muir. 1998. Car
diorespiratory effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and hal
othane anesthesia in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 59: 101
106.
12. Hemelrijck, J. V, W Fitch, M. Mattheussen, H. V.
Aken, C. Plets, and T. Lauwers. 1990. Effect of propofol on cerebral circulation and autoregulation in the baboon.
Anesth Analg 71: 49-51.
13. Holz, R., and P. Holz. 1995. Electrocardiography in
anesthetised red-eared sliders, Trachemys scripts elegans. Res. Vet. Sei. 58: 67-69.
14. Holz, P., and R. M. Holz. 1994. Evaluation of ke
tamine, ketamine/xylazine, and ketamine midazolam an
esthesia in red-eared sliders (Trachemys s cripta elegans). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 25: 531-537.
15. Jones, R. M. 1990. Desflurane and sevoflurane: in
halation anaesthetics for this decade. Br J Anaesth 65:
527-536.
16. Kharasch, E. D., D. C. Hankins, and K. E. Thum
mel. 1995. Human kidney methoxyflurane and sevoflurane
metabolism. Intrarenal fluoride production as a possible mechanism of methoxyflurane nephrotoxicity. Anesthesi
ology 82: 689-699.
17. Littel, R. C, G. A. Milliken, W. W Stroup, and R.
D. Wolfinger. 1997. The SAS System for Mixed Models.
SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
18. Malan, T. P., J. A. DiNardo, R. J. Isner, E. J. Frink,
M. Goldberg, P. E. Fenster, E. A. Brown, R. Depa, L. C.
Hammond, and H. Mata. 1995. Cardiovascular effects of
sevoflurane compared with those of isoflurane in volun
teers. Anesthesiology 83: 918-928.
19. Moon, P. F, and E. K. Stabenau. 1996. Anesthetic
and postanesthetic management of sea turtles. J Am Vet
Med Assoc 208: 720-726.
20. Morio, M., K. Fujii, N. Satoh, M. Imai, V Kawa
kami, T. Mizuno, Y. Kawai, Y. Ogasawara, T. Tamura, A.
Neyishi, Y Kumagai, and T. Kawai. 1992. Reaction of
sevoflurane and its degradation products with soda lime.
Toxicity of the byproducts. Anesthesiology 77: 1155
1164.
21. Muir, W W, J. A. E. Hubbell, R. T. Skarda, and
R. M. Bednarski. 1995. Handbook of Veterinary Anesthe
sia. Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri.
22. Mutoh, T, R. Nishimura, H. Kim, S. Matsunaga, and N. Sasaki. 1997. Cardiopulmonary effects of sevo
flurane, compared to halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane
in dogs. Am J Vet Res 58: 885-890.
23. Nishiyama, T. and A. Hirasaki. 1995. Effects of
sevoflurane anaesthesia on renal function?duration of ad
ministration and area under the curve and rate of decrease
of serum inorganic fluoride. Eur J Anaesthesiol 12: 477
482.
24. Oppenheim, Y, and P. Moon. 1995. Sedative ef
fects of midazolam in red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys
scripts elegans). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 26: 409-413.
25. Page, C. 1993. Current reptilian anesthesia. In:
Fowler, M. (ed.). Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine. Current
Therapy 3. WB. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylva nia. Pp. 141-143.
26. Patel, S. J., and K. L. Goa. 1996. Sevoflurane: a
review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic
properties and its clinical use in general anesthesia. Drugs 51: 658-700.
27. Shaw, S. S., S. Kabler, and P. Lutz. 1992. Isoflur
ane?a safe and effective anesthetic for marine and fresh
water turtles. Proc. Wildl. Rehab. 1992: 112-119.
28. Verborgh, C, D. Verbessern, and F. Camu. 1992.
Haemodynamic effects of isoflurane during propofol. Br
J Anaesth 69: 36-39.
29. West, J. B. 1985. Respiratory Physiology?The Es
sential. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland. 30. Wood, F, K. Critchley, and J. Wood. 1982. Anes
thesia in the green sea turtle, Chelonia mydas. Am J Vet
Res 43: 1882-1883.
Received for publication 1 October 1997
This content downloaded from 157.182.94.224 on Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:14:35 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions