+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Spectroscopic analysis (FT-IR/FT-Raman) and molecular structure investigation on...

Spectroscopic analysis (FT-IR/FT-Raman) and molecular structure investigation on...

Date post: 19-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: pondiuni
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
(This is a sample cover image for this issue. The actual cover is not yet available at this time.) This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright
Transcript

(This is a sample cover image for this issue. The actual cover is not yet available at this time.)

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attachedcopy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial researchand education use, including for instruction at the authors institution

and sharing with colleagues.

Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling orlicensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party

websites are prohibited.

In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of thearticle (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website orinstitutional repository. Authors requiring further information

regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies areencouraged to visit:

http://www.elsevier.com/copyright

Author's personal copy

Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular andBiomolecular Spectroscopy

j our na l ho me p age: www.elsev ier .com/ locate /saa

Spectroscopic analysis (FT-IR/FT-Raman) and molecular structure investigationon m-fluoronitrobenzene using hybrid computational calculations

S. Ramalingama,∗, M. Karabacakb, S. Periandyc, N. Puviarasand

a Department of Physics, A.V.C. College, Mayiladuthurai, Tamilnadu, Indiab Department of Physics, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkeyc Department of Physics, Tagore Arts college, Puducherry, Indiad Satellite Meteorology Division, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Lodi Road, New Delhi, India

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 20 January 2012Received in revised form 4 March 2012Accepted 10 March 2012

Keywords:m-FluoronitrobenzeneMolecular electrostatic potentialVibrational patternPedestal moleculeFrontier molecular orbital energiesMulliken charges

a b s t r a c t

In the present investigation, the FT-IR/FT-Raman spectra of the m-fluoronitrobenzene (m-FNBZ) arerecorded. The fundamental frequencies are assigned and the computational calculations are performedby DFT (B3LYP, B3PW91 and MPW1PW91) methods with 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) basis setsand the corresponding results are tabulated. The computed values of frequencies are scaled by usingsuitable factors. The distortion of the structure of the compound due to the substitutions of Fl and NO2

is investigated. The alternation of the vibrational pattern of the pedestal molecule related to the sub-stitutions is analyzed. A study on the electronic properties; absorption wavelengths, excitation energy,dipole moment and frontier molecular orbital energies, are performed by time dependent DFT (TD-DFT)approach. The electronic structure and the assignment of the absorption bands in the electronic spectraof steady compounds are discussed. The calculated HOMO and LUMO energies show that charge transferoccurs within the molecule. Besides frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), molecular electrostatic potential(MEP) was performed. Mulliken charges of the m-FNBZ molecule was also calculated and interpreted.The thermodynamic properties (heat capacity, entropy, and enthalpy) of the title compound at differenttemperatures were calculated in gas phase.

Crown Copyright © 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Aromatic compound such as benzene derivative of fluoroni-trobenzene is commonly used in pharmaceutical products. Benzeneundergoes nitration and halogenations, then the reactions of thebenzene slow down. Nitrofluorobenzene are produced for indus-trial uses such as dyes, drugs, pesticides, shoe polish, spray paint,and synthetic rubber [1,2]. Fluorine substituent can greatly increasethe fat solubility of molecules, which is particularly importantin pharmaceuticals where it can increase their bioavailability.Molecules including more fluorine, amplifies the effect and haveregular feature in both drug and agrochemical actives. Numerouscommon fungicides also contain fluorine atoms. Fluorine is a com-mon element in antibiotic molecules, too. Fluorine has become apopular feature in drugs and agrochemicals because of the effectsit exerts in molecules. The anti-inflammatory drugs are designedto treat rheumatoid arthritis [1].

Fluorine is the most electronegative atom of all the compounds.It pulls electrons toward it, thus reducing the electron density at the

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 9003398477; fax: +91 9003398477.E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Ramalingam).

carbon in a C F bond. It also affects the molecule’s dipole momentand the molecule’s overall stability. Nitrobenzene is an aromaticnitro compound. Most nitrobenzene (97%) is used in the manufac-turing of aniline. Nitrobenzene is highly toxic in large quantitiesand is mainly produced as a precursor to aniline. In the laboratoryit finds occasional use as a solvent especially for electrophilic [2].

Nitrobenzene can cause a wide variety of harmful health effectsto exposed persons. Repeated exposures to a high concentrationof nitrobenzene can result in a blood condition called methe-moglobinemia (a form of anemia). This condition affects theability of blood carrying oxygen [3]. Exposure level is extremelyhigh nitrobenzene can cause coma and possibly death unlessprompt medical treatment is received. In case of long-term expo-sure to nitrobenzene, the presence of its breakdown products,p-nitrophenol and p-aminophenol, in the urine is an indication ofnitrobenzene exposure. The results of these tests cannot be used todetermine the level of nitrobenzene exposure [4,5]. Therefore thefluorine substituted nitrobenzene is also used to produce pharma-ceutical drugs and agrochemical products.

Various spectroscopic studies of halogen substituted com-pounds have been reported in the literature [6–12] so far. Themolecular structure of ortho- and para-fluoronitrobenzene havebeen investigated by HF and DFT calculations [13,14]. However,

1386-1425/$ – see front matter. Crown Copyright © 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.saa.2012.03.042

Author's personal copyS.

Ram

alingam

et

al.

/

Spectrochimica

Acta

Part

A

94 (2012) 318– 330319

Table 1Optimized geometrical parameters for m-fluoronitrobenzene computed at B3LYP, B3PW91 and MPW1PW91 methods, 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) basis sets.

Geometrical parameters Methods

B3LYP/6−31++G(d,p) B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) B3PW91/6−31++G(d,p) B3PW91/6−311++G(d,p) MPW1PW91/6−31++G(d,p) MPW1PW91/6−311++G(d,p)

Bond length (A)C6 C5 1.397 1.349 1.394 1.391 1.392 1.389C6 C1 1.391 1.393 1.390 1.387 1.388 1.385C1 F13 1.354 1.352 1.346 1.342 1.342 1.338C5 C4 1.395 1.388 1.393 1.390 1.391 1.388C2 H7 1.085 1.392 1.085 1.084 1.083 1.082C4 C3 1.394 1.390 1.391 1.387 1.389 1.385C3 H8 1.082 1.083 1.083 1.081 1.081 1.080C3 C2 1.394 1.080 1.392 1.388 1.390 1.386C3 N10 1.477 1.391 1.472 1.477 1.468 1.473C2 C1 1.387 1.483 1.385 1.382 1.383 1.380C2 H9 1.082 1.384 1.083 1.081 1.081 1.080C6 H14 1.082 1.083 1.084 1.083 1.083 1.082N10 O11 1.231 1.223 1.225 1.217 1.221 1.213N10 O12 1.231 1.223 1.225 1.217 1.221 1.213Bond angle (◦)C5 C6 C1 118.606 118.719 118.692 118.79 118.701 118.831C5 C6 H14 121.786 121.737 121.731 121.700 121.749 121.703C1 C6 H14 119.607 119.543 119.575 119.501 119.54 119.465C6 C5 C4 120.701 120.677 120.718 120.697 120.742 120.684C6 C5 H7 119.620 119.622 119.588 119.594 119.580 119.599C4 C5 H7 119.678 119.699 119.693 119.708 119.677 119.715C5 C4 C3 118.343 118.330 118.279 118.263 118.214 118.231C5 C4 H8 121.869 121.911 122.005 122.054 122.069 122.091C3 C4 H8 119.787 119.758 119.715 119.681 119.715 119.676C4 C3 C2 122.745 122.728 122.821 122.809 122.903 122.861C4 C3 N10 118.995 119.004 118.973 118.981 118.929 118.955C2 C3 N10 118.259 118.267 118.204 118.208 118.167 118.182C3 C2 C1 116.861 116.975 116.905 117.008 116.868 116.989C3 C2 H9 121.437 121.35 121.289 121.212 121.274 121.219C1 C2 H9 121.701 121.671 121.805 121.778 121.857 121.791C6 C1 C2 122.742 122.569 122.582 122.421 122.570 122.401C6 C1 F13 118.728 118.817 118.801 118.882 118.826 118.888C2 C1 F13 118.528 118.612 118.615 118.695 118.603 118.709C3 N10 O11 117.668 117.561 117.564 117.467 117.51 117.446C3 N10 O12 117.627 117.511 117.513 117.412 117.468 117.394O11 N10 O12 124.703 124.926 124.922 125.119 125.021 125.158Dihedral angles (◦)C1 C6 C5 C4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0C1 C6 C5 H7 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0H14 C6 C5 C4 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0H14 C6 C5 H7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0C5 C6 C1 C2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0C5 C6 C1 F13 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0H14 C6 C1 C2 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0H14 C6 C1 F13 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0C6 C5 C4 C3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0C6 C5 C4 H8 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0H7 C5 C4 C3 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0H7 C5 C4 H8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0C5 C4 C3 C2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0C5 C4 C3 N10 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0

Author's personal copy

320 S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330

Tabl

e

1

(Con

tinu

ed)

Geo

met

rica

l par

amet

ers

Met

hod

s

B3L

YP/

6−31

++G

(d,p

)

B3L

YP/

6−31

1++G

(d,p

)

B3P

W91

/6−3

1++G

(d,p

)

B3P

W91

/6−3

11++

G(d

,p)

MPW

1PW

91/6

−31+

+G(d

,p)

MPW

1PW

91/6

−311

++G

(d,p

)

H8

C4

C3

C2

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0H

8C

4C

3N

100.

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C4

C3

C2

C1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C4

C3

C2

H9

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0N

10C

3C

2C

118

0.0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0N

10C

3C

2H

90.

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C4

C3

N10

O11

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0C

4C

3N

10O

120.

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C2

C3

N10

O11

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C2

C3

N10

O12

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0C

3C

2C

6C

10.

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C3

C2

C1

F 13

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0H

9C

2C

1C

618

0.0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0

180.

0H

9C

2C

1F 1

30.

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

no HOMO–LUMO, MEP, NLO analysis or DFT calculation withB3LYP/B3PW91/MPW1PW91 methods at 6−31++G(d,p) and6−311++G(d,p) basis sets is reported on m-FNBZ so far, in spiteof its pharmaceutical importance. Hence, in the present work adetailed DFT vibrational, NLO and electronic structure analysis hasbeen attempted by recording FT-IR and FT-Raman spectra of thecompound m-FNBZ, considering its biological and pharmaceuticaluses.

2. Experimental details

The compound m-FNBZ is purchased from Sigma–AldrichChemicals, USA, which is of spectroscopic grade and hence usedfor recording the spectra as such without any further purification.The FT-IR spectrum of the compound is recorded in Bruker IFS 66Vspectrometer in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The spectral reso-lution is ±2 cm−1. The FT-Raman spectrum of same compound isalso recorded in the same instrument with FRA 106 Raman mod-ule equipped with Nd:YAG laser source operating at 1.064 �m linewidths with 200 mW power. The spectra are recorded in the rangeof 4000–100 cm−1 with scanning speed of 30 cm−1 min−1 of spec-tral width 2 cm−1. The frequencies of all sharp bands are accurateto ±1 cm−1.

3. Computational methods

In the present work, some of the hybrid methods such asB3LYP, B3PW91 and MPW1PW91 were carried out using thebasis sets 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p). All these calcu-lations are performed using GAUSSIAN 09 W program packageon Pentium IV processor in personal computer. In DFT meth-ods; Becke’s three parameter hybrids function combined withthe Lee–Yang–Parr correlation function (B3LYP) [15,16], Becke’sthree parameter exact exchange-function (B3) [17] combined withgradient-corrected correlational functional of Lee, Yang and Parr(LYP) [18,19] and Perdew and Wang (PW91) [20,21] predict thebest results for molecular geometry and vibrational frequencies formoderately larger molecules. Modified Perdew–Wang exchangeand Perdew–Wang 91 correlation method (MPW1PW91) are thebest predicting results for molecular geometry and vibrationalwave numbers for moderately larger molecule [22,23]. The opti-mized structural parameters are used in the vibrational frequencycalculations at DFT (B3LYP, B3PW91 and MPW1PW91) levels. Theminimum energy of geometrical structure is obtained by usinglevel 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) basis sets. At the opti-mized geometry for the title molecule no imaginary frequencymodes are obtained, so there is a true minimum on the poten-tial energy surface is found. The calculated frequencies are scaledby 0.952, 0.932, 1.02, 0.940 and 1.2 for B3LYP/6−31++G(d,p). For6−311++G(d,p) basis set is scaled by 0.958, 0.938, 1.03 and 1.2.For B3PW91/6−31++G(d,p) set is scaled by 0.950, 0.910, 1.04, 1.2and 0.930. For 6−311++G(d,p) basis set is scaled by 0.956, 0.926,0.905 and 1.02. For MPW1PW91/6−31++G(d,p) basis set is scaledby 0.944, 0.930, 0.896, 1.04 and 0.920. For 6−311++ G(d,p) basisset is scaled by 0.950, 0.920, 1.02 and 0.930. The comparative opti-mized structural parameters such as bond length, bond angle anddihedral angle are presented in Table 1.

The total energy distribution (TED) calculations show the rel-ative contributions of the redundant internal coordinates to eachnormal vibrational mode of the molecule which enable numericallyto describe the character of each mode and are carried out by SQMmethod [24,25] using the output files created at the end of the fre-quency calculations. The TED calculations are performed by usingPQS program [25].

Author's personal copy

S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330 321

Fig. 1. Molecular structure of m-fluoronitrobenzene.

The electronic properties, such as HOMO–LUMO energies,absorption wavelengths and oscillator strengths are calculatedusing B3LYP method of the time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) [26,27],basing on the optimized structure in solvent (DMSO and chlo-roform) and gas phase. Thermodynamic properties of the titlecompound at different temperatures have been calculated in gasphase using B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) method.

4. Results and discussion

4.1. Molecular geometry and potential energy surface scan

The molecular structure of m-FNBZ belongs to C2V pointgroup symmetry. The optimized molecular structure of themolecule is obtained from Gaussian 09 and Gauss view pro-gram [28] and is shown in Fig. 1. The molecule contain Fland NO2 group connected with benzene ring. The struc-ture optimization and zero point vibrational energy of thecompound in B3LYP/6−31++G(d,p), B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p),B3PW91/6−31++G(d,p), B3PW91/6−311++G(d,p),MPW1PW91/6−31++G(d,p) and MPW1PW91/6−311+G(d,p)are 59.41, 59.09, 59.72, 59.40, 60.19 and 59.87 Kcal/Mol respec-tively. The comparative optimized structural parameters such asbond lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles are presented inTable 1. Experimental and simulated spectra of IR and Raman arepresented in Figs. 2 and 3 respectively.

The breaking of the pedestal structure belongs to one planesince the substitutions of the nitro group and halogen F arein the same plane of benzene ring. The bond length betweenC C of right moiety of the benzene ring is reduced whereasthe bond length of the left moiety is stretched out. Particu-larly the bond length stretching is greater at the place of NO2group than F atom. It is also evident from the bond length orderas C1 C2 < C1 C6 < C3 C4 < C2 C3 < C4 C5 < C5 C6. The C F bondlength indicates a considerable increase when substituted in placeof C H. Therefore, the coherent of F atom at C which shares its �electron with the ring leads to some changes of the bond lengthsand bond angles of the aromatic ring. The N12 O13 and N12 O14bond lengths are equal as compared to those bond lengths ofnitro benzene [29]. The C F bond length value is calculated as1.338–1.354 A which is in good agreement with literature [13].

Fig. 2. Experimental [A], calculated [B], [C] and [D] FT-IR spectra of m-fluoronitrobenzene.

The hexagonal structure of the ring is mutilated by thesubstitutions and is proved by the bond angle order asC1 C2 C3 < C3 C4 C5 < C5 C6 C1 < C4 C5 C6 < C2 C1 C6 < C2C3 C4. The bond angle 122.8◦ at the place of the NO2 group in thering is 0.3◦ elongated than the place of F. The rest of the bond anglesof the ring are less. The bond angle between the substitutions isgreatly reduced to 116.9◦.

Substitution with the F atom and NO2 group leads to somechanges of the bond angles in the benzene ring. The C2 C3 C4and C2 C3 C4 angles at the position of the F atom NO2 group sub-stituent is bigger (122◦) and the others are smaller or equal typicalhexagonal angle of 120◦. This clearly shows that the substitution ofF atom and NO2 group in place of hydrogen appreciably affects theC2 C3 C4 and C2 C3 C4 bond angles.

Fig. 3. Experimental [A], calculated [B], [C] and [D] FT-IR spectra of m-fluoronitrobenzene.

Author's personal copy

322 S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330

Fig. 4. PES scan for the selected torsional angle T(C C N O) of freedom.

To determine the most stable energy conformation of the m-FNBZ molecule, a conformation analysis is performed betweenbenzene ring and NO2 group system on C C N O atoms. Toexplain conformational features of m-FNBZ, the selected degreeof torsional freedom, T(C C N O) was varied from 0◦ to 360◦ invery 10◦ and the molecular energy profile is obtained with theB3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) method. The conformational energy profileshows two maxima near 90◦ and 270◦ title torsion angle. The maxi-mum energies are obtained −536.131739795 and −536.131739946Hartree for 90◦ and 270◦ dihedral angles, respectively. The aromaticrings are nearly perpendicular at these values of selected torsionangle. It is clear from Fig. 4, there are two local minima observed at0◦ (or 360◦) and 180◦ for the torsion angle. The minimum energyis obtained −536.140708626 Hartree. From this result, it is foundthat, the NO2 group is at same plane with the ring.

4.2. Vibrational assignments

The m-FNBZ molecule consists of 14 atoms, which undergoes36 normal modes of vibrations. On the assumption of C2v group ofsymmetry, the numbers of vibration modes of the 36 fundamentalvibrations of the molecule are distributed as

�Vib. = 13A1 + 7B1 + 4A2 + 12B2

The assignments are shown in Table 2. The harmonic vibrationalfrequencies (unscaled and scaled) calculated at B3LYP, B3PW91 andMPW1PW91 levels using the triple split valence basis set alongwith the diffuse and polarization functions, 6−31++G(d,p) and6−311++G(d,p) and observed FT-IR and FT-Raman frequencies forvarious modes of vibrations have been presented in Tables 3 and 4.Comparison of frequencies calculated at HF and B3LYP/LSDA withthe experimental values reveal the over estimation of the calcu-lated vibrational modes due to the neglect of a harmonicity in realsystem. Inclusion of electron correlation in the density functionaltheory to certain extends makes the frequency values smaller incomparison with the HF frequency data. Therefore, we selectedDFT/B3LYP/B3PW91/MPW1PW91 levels. Reduction in the com-puted harmonic vibrations, although basis set sensitive is onlymarginal as observed in the DFT values using 6−311++G(d,p). Thecalculated IR intensity and Raman activity values are presented inTables 5 and 6, respectively.

4.2.1. Computed vibrational frequency analysisThe standard deviation (SD) calculation made between

experimental and computed frequencies DFT for the m-FNBZ ispresented in Table 7. According to the SD, the computed frequencydeviation decreases in going from MPW1PW91/6−31++G(d,p)

Table 2Experimental FT-IR, FT-Raman frequencies (cm−1) and assignments for m-FNBZ.

Species C2v FT-IR (cm−1) FT-Raman (cm−1) Vibrational Assignments

A1 3100 s – (C H) �B2 3095 s – (C H) �B2 3090 s 3090 m (C H) �A1 3050 w – (C H) �B2 1590 vs 1590 m (C C) �A1 1530 vs – (C C) �B2 1500 vs 1500w (NO2) � asymA1 1370 vs – (C C) �B2 1350 vs 1350 vs (NO2) � symA1 1345 vs – (C C) �B2 1320 s 1320 m (C C) �B2 1200 vs – (C C) �A1 1140 vs 1140 w (C F) �A1 1100 vs 1100 s (C H) ıA1 1090 vs – (C H) ıB2 1060 w – (C H) ıA1 1020 m – (C H) ıA2 1005 w – (C N) � (C H) �B1 1000 m – (C H) �A1 870 vs 870 s (C H) �B1 860 w – (C H) �A2 820 w 820 w (CCC) ıA1 810 w 810 w (CCC) ıB1 760 vs – (NO2) ıB1 720 vs – (CCC) ıB2 620 vs – (C N) ıA1 570 w – (NO2) ωB2 560 w – (NO2) ıB1 480 m – (CCC) �A2 450 m – (CCC) �B2 420 m – (CCC) �A1 – 320 w (C F) ıB1 – 305 m (C N) �B2 – 250 w (C F) �B1 – 170 w (NO2) �A2 – 110 w (NO2) �

vs – very strong; s – strong; m – medium; w – weak; � – stretching; ı – in planebending; � – out plane bending; � – twisting.

to MPW1PW91/6−311++G(d,p) to B3LYP/6−31++G(d,p)to B3PW91/6−31++G(d,p) to B3PW91/6−311++G(d,p) toB3LYP/6−311++G(d,p). The deviation ratio between B3LYPmethods is 1.21, between B3PW91 methods is 1.06 and betweenMPW1PW91 methods is 1.05. It is also observed that the calculatedfrequencies by B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) basis sets are closer to theexperimental frequencies.

4.2.2. C H vibrationsThe aromatic organic compounds structure; benzene and its

derivatives show the presence of asymmetric C H stretchingvibrations in the region 3100–3000 cm−1 [30–32] which is the char-acteristics region for recognition on C H stretching vibrations. Inthe title molecule, four bands have been observed at 3100, 3095,3090 and 3050 cm−1 assigned to C H stretching vibrations. Theentire vibrations are observed at the top end of the expected regionwhich is due to the favoring of the substitutions. All aromatic C Hstretch modes are pure stretching modes as it is evident from TEDcolumn in Table 4, they are almost 100%. This is indicating that theimpact of substitution NO2 group in the molecule which does notmuch influence the vibration of aromatic C H.

The strongest absorptions for aromatic compounds occur in theregion 1300–1000 cm−1 and 1000–750 cm−1 due to the C H inplane and out of plane bending vibrations respectively [33–37]. Inthe present case, the in plane bending vibrations are found at 1100,1090, 1060 and 1020 cm−1 in FT-IR and FT-Raman. The out of planebending vibrations are observed at 1005, 1000, 870 and 860 cm−1.Most of the bending vibrations are found in IR and all the bend-ing vibrations are within the expected region. This view indicates

Author's personal copy

S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330 323

Table 3Calculated with B3LYP/B3PW91/MPW1PW91 methods at 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) level unscaled vibrational frequencies (cm−1) of m-FNBZ.

S. no. B3LYP B3PW91 MPW1PW91

6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p) 6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p) 6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p)

1 3254 3233 3262 3240 3281 32572 3250 3229 3258 3237 3277 32553 3226 3208 3238 3218 3257 32364 3208 3190 3219 3200 3238 32185 1663 1655 1687 1677 1708 16986 1643 1634 1657 1650 1672 16657 1606 1592 1644 1632 1665 16568 1515 1509 1521 1515 1534 15279 1476 1470 1482 1476 1493 1488

10 1385 1372 1416 1404 1440 142911 1372 1355 1394 1380 1400 138712 1298 1295 1297 1292 1307 130113 1248 1240 1259 1252 1271 126414 1181 1179 1179 1176 1185 118115 1100 1097 1102 1098 1109 110516 1091 1084 1095 1088 1104 109717 1019 1018 1019 1018 1025 102418 996 993 996 989 1005 99819 941 939 951 949 961 95920 935 932 933 929 941 93821 911 905 908 900 914 90722 817 827 825 835 833 84323 810 805 809 804 815 81024 747 731 753 738 761 74525 681 683 681 683 686 68826 662 655 662 653 665 65627 558 560 559 561 564 56528 539 537 539 538 543 54229 507 508 508 509 511 53130 444 440 442 437 444 44031 418 419 419 420 422 42432 375 375 378 378 382 38233 243 242 243 241 245 24434 216 216 216 216 218 21835 165 163 165 164 167 16536 55 47 55 48 56 49

that the substitutions in the ring have not influenced the bendingvibrations.

4.2.3. C C vibrationsThe ring stretching vibrations are very much important in the

spectrum of benzene and its derivatives are highly characteris-tic of the aromatic ring itself. The ring C C and C C stretchingvibrations, known as semicircle stretching usually occur in theregion 1400–1625 cm−1 [33]. Particularly, the bands between theregions 1590–1650 cm−1 [38] and 1590–1430 cm−1 [39,40] in ben-zene derivatives are usually assigned to C C and the C C stretchingvibrations respectively. In the present case, the C C stretchingvibrations are observed with very strong intensity at 1590, 1530and 1370 cm−1. The corresponding C C stretching vibrations arefound with very strong intensity at 1345, 1320 and 1200 cm−1.Except one in C C, the entire vibrations are observed well belowthe expected region. From this observation it is clear that the ringstretching vibrations are affected much due to the NO2 and F.

In the present compound, the C C C in-plane and out of planebending vibrations are appeared very strong and medium intensityat 820, 810 and 720 cm−1 and 480, 460 and 420 cm−1 respectively.All the assignments related to in-plane and out of plane bendingvibrations are in coherent with the literature values [6,8,10,33–35].

4.2.4. NO2 vibrationsThe asymmetric stretching for the NO2 has a magnitude higher

than that of the symmetric stretching [41]. The characteristic groupfrequencies of the nitro group are relatively independent of therest of the molecule which makes this group convenient to iden-tify. Aromatic nitro compounds have strong absorptions due to the

asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the NO2 groupat 1570–1485 cm−1 and 1370–1320 cm−1 respectively [38]. Asiriet al. [42] assigned the frequencies at 1512 and 1332 cm−1 to NO2asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations, respectively. Inthis present case, two very strong bands at 1500 and 1350 cm−1

have been assigned to asymmetric and symmetric stretching modesof NO2 respectively. The TED of these modes are contributing 80%for NO2 asymmetric stretching and 80% for NO2 symmetric stretch-ing. Because of the favoring of other substitutions in the ring, boththe vibrations are found well above the expected range.

The other vibrations of NO2 group (rocking, wagging and twist-ing) contribute to several normal modes in the low frequencyregion. Aromatic nitro compounds have a band of weak to mediumintensity in the region 590–500 cm−1 [33] due to the out-of-planebending deformation mode of the NO2 group. Likewise, the in-planeNO2 deformation vibrations have a week to medium absorption inthe region 775–660 cm−1 [33]. The deformation (in-plane bend-ing) is observed at 760 cm−1 [43] and out-plane bending vibrationis assigned at 570 cm−1. The NO2 twisting for this compound is at170 and 110 cm−1 in FT-Raman spectrum. Thus the NO2 vibrationshave not affected by the substitutions in the ring.

4.2.5. C F vibrationsAssignments of the C F stretching modes are very difficult

as these vibrations are strongly coupled with the other in planebending vibrations of several modes. The observed bands of theC F stretching vibrations have been found to be very strong inthe IR spectra and these appear in the range 1000–1300 cm−1 forseveral fluoro-benzenes [44,45]. And also the C F stretching vibra-tions strongly coupled with the C H in-plane bending vibrations

Author's personal copy324

S.

Ram

alingam

et

al.

/

Spectrochimica

Acta

Part

A

94 (2012) 318– 330

Table 4Calculated with B3LYP/B3PW91/MPW1PW91methods at 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) level scaled frequencies (cm−1) of m-FNBZ.

Observed frequencies(cm−1)

Calculated frequencies (cm−1) [scaled] Vibrational Assignments fromB3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) TED (≥10%)

FT-IR FT-Raman B3LYP/6−31++G(d,p)

B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p)

B3PW91/6−31++G(d,p)

B3PW91/6−311++G(d,p)

MPW1PW91/6−31++G(d,p)

MPW1PW91/6−311++G(d,p)

3100 s – 3098 3097 3099 3097 3097 3094 � CH (100)3095 s – 3094 3093 3095 3095 3093 3092 � CH (99)3090 s 3090 m 3071 3073 3076 3076 3075 3074 � CH (98)

3050 w – 3054 3056 3058 3059 3057 3057 � CH (98)1590 vs 1590 m 1583 1585 1603 1603 1588 1579 � CC (65) + � NO (12) asym1530 vs – 1531 1533 1541 1528 1538 1532 � CC (73) + ı CCH (11)1500 vs 1500w 1497 1493 1496 1511 1532 1499 � NO2 (80) asym1370 vs – 1379 1388 1384 1371 1374 1382 ı CCH (50) + � CC (29)1350 vs 1350 vs 1343 1352 1349 1367 1338 1369 � NO2 (80) sym + � CN (10)

1320 s – 1319 1314 1317 1314 1325 1315 � CC (40) + ı CCH (36)1290 m 1290w 1279 1298 1296 1292 1288 1276 � CC (90)1200 vs – 1210 1191 1206 1209 1202 1197 ı CCH (72)1140 vs 1140 w 1136 1141 1146 1133 1139 1144 � CF (40) + ı CCH (19) + � CC (14)1100 vs 1100 s 1101 1106 1096 1101 1102 1098 ı CCH (78) + � CC (19)1090 vs – 1100 1097 1102 1098 1109 1050 ı CCH (50) + � CC (40)1060 w – 1039 1038 1040 1040 1042 1042 ı CCH (40) + � CC (25) + � CN (14)1020 m – 1019 1018 1019 1018 1025 1024 ı CCH (39) + � CC (31)1015 w – 1016 1023 1036 1019 1005 1018 � CN (34) + � CC (18) + � CF (16)1010 m – 960 1127 989 977 1009 978 � CH (85)870 vs 870 s 871 874 868 871 875 863 � CH (87)860 w – 849 867 863 862 863 862 � CH (87)820 w 820 w 817 827 825 835 833 801 ı NO2 (56) + ı CCH (15) + � CF (12)810 w 810 w 810 805 809 804 815 810 � CH (90)760 vs – 762 753 753 760 761 760 � CCNO (82)720 vs – 695 703 708 703 713 702 ıCCC (49) + ı NO2 (13) + � CC (11)610 vs – 617 614 602 611 612 610 � CCCC (56) + � CCCH (39)570 w – 569 577 570 578 564 576 ıCNO (48) + ıCCC (23) + ı CCF (10)560 w – 550 553 550 554 565 553 ω Ring (70) + � CCCF (20)480 m – 483 477 472 476 482 481 ı CCC (39) + ı CNO (21) + ı CCF (28)450 m – 453 453 451 450 453 449 � CCCC (68) + � CCCH (23)420 m – 418 419 419 420 422 424 ı CF (41) + ı CNO (32) + ı CCC (13)

– 320 w 341 345 344 342 342 346 � C NO2 (55) + ı CCF (17)– 310 m 292 290 292 289 294 293 ω m-FBZ (97) (� CF + � CC)– 250 w 259 259 259 259 262 262 r NO2 (79) + ı CF (12)– 170 w 168 168 168 167 200 198 ω m-FNBZ (89)– 110 w 66 56 66 58 67 59 t NO2 (96)

� – stretching; ı – in plane bending; � – out of plane bending; � – torsion; t – twisting; r – rocking; ω – wagging.

Author's personal copy

S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330 325

Table 5Comparative values of IR intensities between B3LYP/B3PW91/MPW1PW91 at 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) basis sets of m-FNBZ.

S. no. B3LYP B3PW91 MPW1PW91

6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p) 6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p) 6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p)

1 11.02 11.3 11.5 11.8 12.1 12.02 3.35 3.76 3.71 4.15 4.05 4.323 0.57 0.38 0.34 0.20 0.19 0.174 4.18 3.61 3.73 3.27 3.48 3.175 3.96 2.64 34.7 18.8 74.0 48.46 12.04 12.3 23.4 18.6 44.9 30.77 350.7 370.6 305.0 343.0 258.7 316.48 47.5 47.2 66.0 67.2 69.3 70.59 3.37 2.56 3.88 3.24 4.72 3.78

10 269.7 265.8 275.4 274.0 277.3 276.711 16.6 17.2 16.2 16.4 17.1 17.612 22.8 20.6 44.1 40.8 51.3 47.613 114.5 123.9 85.7 96.8 72.9 84.514 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.015 21.5 18.4 24.6 20.5 29.0 23.716 13.61 18.0 12.3 17.4 7.12 13.117 0.11 0.12 0.17 0.11 0.20 0.1518 0.17 0.07 0.13 0.02 0.12 0.0319 19.11 19.4 17.4 17.9 17.0 17.420 1.01 0.42 0.79 0.36 0.66 0.3021 23.7 24.4 24.8 24.6 25.3 24.822 60.13 64.2 61.0 64.8 62.0 65.923 27.16 38.5 25.7 38.6 25.9 38.924 35.11 20.3 39.2 22.8 41.3 23.825 2.99 2.18 2.86 2.12 3.13 2.3726 10.45 14.8 11.3 14.7 12.0 15.127 3.04 3.24 2.41 2.51 2.33 2.3928 2.82 2.77 2.90 2.75 2.93 2.7029 2.42 2.63 2.36 2.58 2.31 2.5130 0.655 0.94 0.76 1.01 0.85 1.1031 2.77 2.59 2.67 2.54 2.85 2.7232 0.21 0.15 0.24 0.18 0.29 0.2333 0.165 0.19 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.1534 2.51 2.58 2.46 2.51 2.51 2.5635 1.73 1.63 1.52 1.46 1.49 1.4636 0.33 0.30 0.31 0.28 0.31 0.28

in the mono fluorinated benzene and is observed in the region1100–1000 cm−1 [46]. In the present case, the C F stretching vibra-tion is observed at 1140 cm−1. The C F in-plane bending vibrationmode for the mono fluorinated benzene is normally assigned at250–350 cm−1 [47]. In the present case, a band is assigned to C F in-plane bending at 320 cm−1. The frequency of the C F out-of-planebending vibration assigned at 250 cm−1. According to the reportedvalues [48], this assignment is in line with the literature. All theC F vibrations are found within the expected region which showsthat these vibrations have not affected by other substitution in thering.

4.2.6. C N vibrationsThe identification of C N vibrations is difficult task since the

mixing of vibrations is possible in this region. Mostly, the ring C Hbending vibrations are mixed with this vibration. In this presentmolecule, the C N stretching vibration is identified with weakintensity at 1005 cm−1 in infrared region and is mixed with theC H out of plane bending vibration. The corresponding C N in-plane and out-of-plane bending vibrations are found at 620 and305 cm−1. This view is supported by the literatures [14,35].

4.3. Thermodynamic properties

The variation in Zero-Point Vibrational Energies (ZPVEs)seems to be significant. The values of some thermodynamicparameters (such as zero-point vibrational energy, thermalenergy, specific heat capacity, rotational constants, entropy, anddipole moment) of m-FNBZ by DFT (B3LYP/B3PW91/MPW1PW91)with 6−31++G(d,p)/6−311++G(d,p) method at 298.150 K and

1.00 atm pressure are listed in Table 8. The ZPVE energy ismuch lower in the DFT/B3LYP method [for 59.09892 kcal mol−1

B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p)] than by other methods. The biggestvalue of ZPVE of m-FNBZ is 60.19197 kcal mol−1 obtained atMPW1PW91/6−31++G(d,p) method.

On the basis of vibrational analysis at B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p)level, the standard statistical thermodynamic functions: standardheat capacities (Cp,m

◦) standard entropies (Sp,m◦), and standard

enthalpy changes (Hm◦) for the title compound are obtained from

the theoretical harmonic frequencies and listed in Table 9.From Table 9, it can be observed that these thermodynamic

functions are increasing with temperature ranging from 100 to700 K due to the fact that the molecular vibrational intensitiesincrease with temperature. The correlation equations between heatcapacity, entropy, enthalpy changes and temperatures are fitted byquadratic formulas and the corresponding fitting factors (R2) forthese thermodynamic properties are 0.9992, 1.0000 and 0.9998,respectively. The corresponding fitting equations are as follows andthe correlation graphics of those shows in Figs. 5–7.

Cp,m◦ = 0.0217 + 0.1130T − 5.1395 × 10−5T2 (R2 = 0.9992)

Sm◦ = 54.0304 + 0.1245T − 3.2797 × 10−5T2 (R2 = 1.0000)

Hm◦ = −0.3172 + 0.0086T + 3.6722 × 10−5T2 (R2 = 0.9998)

All the thermodynamic data supply helpful information for thefurther study on the m-FNBZ. They can be used to compute the otherthermodynamic energies according to relationships of thermo-dynamic functions and estimate directions of chemical reactionsaccording to the second law of thermodynamics in thermochemical

Author's personal copy

326 S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330

Table 6Comparative values of Raman activities between B3LYP/B3PW91/MPW1PW91 at 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) basis sets of m-FNBZ.

S. no. B3LYP B3PW91 MPW1PW91

6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p) 6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p) 6−31++G(d,p) 6−311++G(d,p)

1 61.04 58.6 59.8 56.0 58.7 54.22 73.9 75.14 78.4 79.7 77.6 80.63 154.6 149.2 151.3 144.4 147.7 141.84 77.23 70.7 74.4 68.1 74.2 65.35 0.89 0.61 2.54 1.25 4.04 2.276 73.0 66.9 66.4 62.0 61.5 59.37 16.7 15.7 15.5 15.1 16.5 14.78 1.07 1.06 0.87 0.87 0.79 0.819 1.14 0.72 1.30 0.76 1.95 1.07

10 167.1 147.8 157.2 141.2 153.2 138.211 1.37 1.31 1.40 1.35 1.35 1.2912 5.21 4.54 9.62 8.25 11.6 10.013 39.3 39.7 31.9 33.4 27.9 29.814 4.62 4.21 4.61 4.17 4.49 4.1315 1.46 1.61 1.41 1.63 1.43 1.3216 12.2 11.8 11.5 11.1 11.0 11.017 32.9 32.0 30.7 30.0 30.8 30.018 0.13 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.14 0.0919 3.18 3.15 3.07 3.03 3.02 2.9520 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.021 0.08 0.03 0.12 0.05 0.10 0.0322 14.5 13.9 13.2 12.6 12.5 12.023 0.36 0.22 0.25 0.18 0.32 0.2524 0.72 1.01 0.71 0.99 0.73 1.0225 4.41 4.71 4.61 4.93 4.69 5.0126 0.10 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.08 0.0527 0.58 0.60 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.4428 0.33 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.35 0.3029 5.68 5.64 5.57 5.55 5.49 5.4430 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.0431 1.49 1.53 1.43 1.47 1.39 1.4432 3.47 3.41 3.52 3.48 3.47 3.4633 2.12 1.95 2.07 1.91 2.06 1.9134 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.1535 1.34 1.34 1.38 1.34 1.40 1.3736 0.37 0.38 0.35 0.37 0.36 0.38

field. Notice: all the thermodynamic calculations have been carriedout in gas phase and they could not be used in solution.

4.4. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) maps

To predict reactive sites for electrophilic and nucleophilic attackfor the investigated molecule, MEP is calculated (red is negative,blue is positive) at the B3LYP/6−311++G(d) optimized geometries.Fig. 8 shows the calculated 3D electrostatic potential contour mapof m-FNBZ. The negative regions of V(r) were related to elec-trophilic reactivity and the positive ones to nucleophilic reactivity.The different values of the electrostatic potential at the surface arerepresented by different colors. Potential increases in the orderred < orange < yellow < green < blue. The color code of these mapsis in the range between −0.04315 a.u. (deepest red) to 0.04315 a.u.(deepest blue) in compound, where blue indicates the strongestattraction and red indicates the strongest repulsion. As easily canbe seen in Fig. 8, this molecule has several possible sites for elec-trophilic attack in which V(r) calculations have provided insights.

The most negative V(r) value is associated with oxygen atomswith a value around −0.0430102 a.u. while the most positive valuecorrespond to the hydrogen atoms of m-FNBZ molecule (about0.0380617 a.u.). From this result, it is clear that the H atoms indi-cate the strongest attraction and O atoms indicate the strongestrepulsion.

4.5. Mulliken atomic charge

The charge distribution on the molecule has an important influ-ence on the vibrational spectra. The calculated Mulliken chargedistributions of benzene derivates are compared in Table 10. Theresults show that substitution of the aromatic ring by NO2 groupand fluoro atom leads to a redistribution of electron density. Thecorresponding Mulliken’s plot is shown in Fig. 9 and illustration ofatomic charges plotted is shown in Fig. 10. The results show thatsubstitution of the aromatic ring by a F atom leads to a redistri-bution of electron density of benzene. As can be seen in Table 10all the hydrogen atoms have a net positive charge. Moreover, for

Table 7Standard Deviation of frequencies by DFT (B3LYP, B3PW91 and MPW1PW91) at 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p) basis sets.

S. no. Basic set levels Total values Average Standard deviation Deviation ratio

Experimental 40,010 2162.7 –1 B3LYP/6−31++G(d,p) 41,555 2246.2 49.9 1.212 B3LYP 6−311++G(d,p) 41,337 2234.4 41.03 B3PW91/6−31++G(d,p) 41,771 2257.8 47.4 1.064 B3PW91/6−311++G(d,p) 41,545 2245.6 44.65 MPW1PW91/6−31++G(d,p) 42,099 2275.6 51.8 1.056 MPW1PW91/6−311++G(d,p) 41,892 2264.4 49.2

Author's personal copy

S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330 327

Tab

le

8Th

e

calc

ula

ted

ther

mod

ynam

ical

par

amet

ers

of

m-F

NB

Z

mol

ecu

le

in

grou

nd

stat

e

at

298.

15

K.

Bas

ic

set

B3L

YP

6−31

++G

(d,p

)

B3L

YP

6−31

1++G

(d,p

)

B3P

W91

6−31

++G

(d,p

)

B3P

W91

6−31

1++G

(d,p

)

MPW

1PW

91

6−31

++G

(d,p

)

MPW

1PW

91

6−31

1++G

(d,p

)

SCF

ener

gy

(a.u

.)

−536

.015

712

−536

.140

682

−535

.808

555

−535

.928

751

−535

.883

349

−536

.002

652

Zero

poi

nt

vib.

ener

gy

(kca

l mol

−1)

59.4

1920

59.0

9892

59.7

2295

59.4

0124

60.1

9197

59.8

7017

Rot

atio

nal

con

stan

ts

(GH

z)

2.70

419

0.96

152

0.70

931

2.71

949

0.96

397

0.71

170

2.71

744

0.96

771

0.71

359

2.73

265

0.97

028

0.71

603

2.72

786

0.97

235

0.71

683

2.74

327

0.97

457

0.71

910

Spec

ific

hea

t

(Cv)

(cal

mol

−1K

−1)

28.7

76

28.8

81

28.6

97

28.8

05

28.4

91

28.5

94En

trop

y

(S)

(cal

mol

−1K

−1)

87.8

78

88.2

41

87.8

39

88.1

63

87.5

97

87.9

40D

ipol

e

mom

ent

(Deb

ye)

4.24

34

4.20

07

4.16

77

4.12

62

4.16

70

4.13

10

Table 9Thermodynamic properties at different temperatures at the B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p)level for m-FNBZ molecule.

T (K) Cp,m◦ (cal mol−1 K−1) Sm

◦ (cal mol−1 K−1) �Hm◦ (kcal mol−1)

100 11.663 65.875 1.046150 15.628 72.142 1.825200 20.003 77.801 2.814250 24.547 83.196 4.027298 28.881 88.241 5.410300 29.045 88.433 5.467350 33.324 93.542 7.127400 37.275 98.519 8.993450 40.849 103.353 11.047500 44.041 108.035 13.270550 46.875 112.558 15.644600 49.387 116.919 18.151650 51.616 121.121 20.776700 53.600 125.167 23.507

Fig. 5. Correlation graphic of heat capacity and temperature for m-FNBZ molecule.

F-benzene molecule, the H9 and H14 atoms in cis position to Fatom accommodate higher positive charge than the other hydro-gen atoms. For nitrobenzene, the H8 and H9 atoms near position tooxygen atoms accommodate higher positive charge than the otherhydrogen atoms. Similar results can be seen for m-FNBZ. The Mul-liken atomic charge of m-FNBZ shows that the H9 atom has morepositive atomic charge [0.287e] than the other hydrogen atoms.This is due to the presence of electronegative flouro atom, thehydrogen atom attract the positive charge from the flouro atom.

Fig. 6. Correlation graphic of entropy and temperature for m-FNBZ molecule.

Author's personal copy

328 S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330

Fig. 7. Correlation graphic of enthalpy and temperature for m-FNBZ molecule.

Fig. 8. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) map in gas phase of m-FNBZ.

4.6. Electronic properties (HOMO–LUMO analysis)

In order to understand electronic transitions of compound,time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations on electronic absorp-tion spectrum in vacuum and solvent (DMSO and Chloroform)are performed by B3LYP/6−311++G(d). The calculated absorptionwavelengths (), oscillator strengths (f), excitation energies (E)and dipole moments are given Table 11. The strong transitionsat 324.66 nm (3.8189 eV) with an oscillator strength f = 0.0346 in

Table 10Mulliken atomic charges of m-fluoronitrobenzene, fluoro benzene, nitrobenzeneand benzene using B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) basis set.

Atoms m-Fluoro-nitrobenzene Fluoro-benzene Nitrobenzene Benzene

1C 0.419 0.246 0.034 −0.1582C −0.634 −0.219 −0.602 −0.1493C 0.525 −0.199 0.623 −0.1494C −0.871 −0.219 −0.967 −0.1585C 0.853 0.246 0.623 −0.1496C −0.926 −0.569 −0.602 −0.1497H 0.188 0.169 0.181 0.1518H 0.266 0.157 0.265 0.1529H 0.287 0.194 0.264 0.15210N/H −0.138 0.169 −0.136 0.15111O −0.014 – −0.018 –12O −0.011 – −0.018 –13F/H −0.158 −0.171 0.181 0.15214H 0.214 0.194 0.173 0.152

Fig. 9. Mulliken charge distributions of m-FNBZ molecule.

DMSO, at 320.71 nm (3.8659 eV) in Chloroform and at 328.51 nm(3.7741 eV) in gas phase are assigned to a n–�* transition. Themajor contributions of the transitions are designated with the aidof SWizard program [49]. In view of calculated absorption spectra,the maximum absorption wavelength corresponds to the electronictransition from the HOMO−2 to LUMO with 97% contribution. Theother wavelength, excitation energies, oscillator strength and cal-culated counterparts with major contributions are presented inTable 11.

The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowestunoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are the main orbitals thattake part in chemical stability [50]. The HOMO represents the abilityto donate an electron, LUMO as an electron acceptor represents theability to obtain an electron the HOMO and LUMO energy calculatedby B3LYP with 6−311G++(d,p) basis set is shown in Fig. 11.

The HOMO is located over the benzene ring and F atom, theHOMO→LUMO transition implies an electron density transfer tonitro group from F atom. The HOMO could be characterized as a�-bonding molecular orbital and HOMO−2 could be characterizedas a n-bonding molecular orbital. Finally, the LUMO and LUMO+1exhibit a �-anti-bonding molecular orbital.

HOMO energy = −7.93708 eVLUMO energy = −3.15546 eV.HOMO–LUMO energy gap = 4.78162 eV.

Fig. 10. The graph of calculated Mulliken charge distributions of m-FNBZ.

Author's personal copy

S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330 329

Table 11Theoretical electronic absorption spectra of m-FNBZ (absorption wavelength (nm), excitation energies E (eV) and oscillator strengths (f)) using TD-DFT/B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p)method in gas and solvent (DMSO and chloroform) phase.

DMSO Chloroform Gas Gas

(nm) E (eV) (f) (nm) E (eV) (f) (nm) E (eV) (f) Major contributiona Assignment

324.66 3.8189 0.0346 320.71 3.8659 0.0000 328.51 3.7741 0.0000 H-2 → L (97%) n–�*317.74 3.9020 0.0000 317.97 3.8992 0.0373 300.10 4.1314 0.0297 H → L (94%) �–�*281.39 4.4061 0.0003 283.62 4.3715 0.0003 289.16 4.2878 0.0003 H-3 → L (97%) �–�*

a H, HOMO; L, LUMO.

Table 12Calculated energies values of m-FNBZ in Gas and solvent (DMSO and chloroform) phase.

TD-DFT/B3LYP/6−311G+(d,p) DMSO Chloroform Gas

Etotal (Hartree) −536.00836 −536.00441 −536.00198EHOMO (eV) −7.686 −7.749 −7.937ELUMO (eV) −3.187 −3.172 −3.155�EHOMO-LUMO gap (eV) 4.498 4.577 4.781EHOMO−1 (eV) −8.135 −8.202 −8.402ELUMO+1 (eV) −1.115 −1.188 −1.403�EHOMO−1–LUMO+1 gap (eV) 7.019 7.014 6.998Dipole moment 5.318 5.0048 4.200

The energy gap explains the eventual charge transfer interac-tions taking place within the molecule. The increase in energy gapbetween HOMO and LUMO facilitates which makes the material tobe chemical hardness molecule. The value of chemical hardness is2.36081 eV for the title molecule

The dipole moment in a molecule is an important electronic fea-ture which results from non-uniform distribution of charges on thevarious atoms in a molecule. Based on predicted dipole momentvalues, it is found that, in going to the solvent phase from the gasphase, the dipole moment value increases (Table 12).

Fig. 11. The atomic orbital compositions of the frontier molecular orbital for m-FNBZ molecule in gas phase.

4.7. Polarizability first order hyperpolarizability calculations

In order to investigate the relationships among molecular struc-tures and non-linear optic properties (NLO), the polarizabilitiesand hyperpolarizabilities of title compound are calculated usingDFT-B3LYP method and 6−311++G(d,p) basis set, based on thefinite-field approach.

The polarizability and hyperpolarizability tensors (˛xx, ˛xy, ˛yy,˛xz, ˛yz, ˛zz and ˇxxx, ˇxxy, ˇxyy, ˇyyy, ˇxxz, ˇxyz, ˇyyz, ˇxzz, ˇyzz,ˇzzz) are obtained from frequency job output file of Gaussian. How-ever, and values of Gaussian output are in atomic units (a.u.)so the values have been converted into electronic units (esu) (˛;1 a.u. = 0.1482 × 10−24 esu, ˇ; 1 a.u. = 8.6393 × 10−33 esu). The meanpolarizability (˛), anisotropy of polarizability (�˛) and the aver-age value of the first hyperpolarizabiliy 〈ˇ〉 are calculated using theequations.

˛tot = 13

(˛xx + ˛yy + ˛zz)

�˛ = 1√

2[(˛xx − ˛yy)2 + (˛yy − ˛zz)2 + (˛zz − ˛xx)2 + 6˛xz2 + 6˛xy

2 + +6˛yz2]

1/2

〈ˇ〉 = [(ˇxxx + ˇxyy + ˇxzz)2 + (ˇyyy + ˇyzz + ˇyxx)2 + (ˇzzz + ˇzxx + ˇzyy)2]1/2

In Table 13, the calculated parameters described above and elec-tronic dipole moment {�i (i = x, y, z) and total dipole moment �tot}

Table 13The dipole moments � (Debye), the polarizability (a.u.), the average polarizability˛o (A), the anisotropy of the polarizability �˛ (A), and the component of hyperpo-larizability ˇx , ˇy and ˇz (a.u.) and the first hyperpolarizability (×10−30 cm5 esu−1)of m-FNBZ.

�x 1.3267 ˇxxx 402.3300�y 0.9854 ˇxxy −77.1000�z 0.00 ˇxyy 50.7237�0 1.6526 ˇyyy 76.6681˛xx 111.2965 ˇxxz 0.00˛xy −3.1057 ˇxyz 0.00˛yy 97.2456 ˇyyz 0.00˛xz 0.00 ˇxzz −29.941˛yz 0.00 ˇyzz 41.4449˛zz 44.4123 ˇzzz 0.00˛0 12.4959 ˇx 423.1122�˛ 29.9686 ˇy 41.0130

ˇz 0.00ˇ 3.6725

Author's personal copy

330 S. Ramalingam et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 94 (2012) 318– 330

for title compound are listed. The total dipole moment can be cal-culated using the following equation.

�tot = (�x2 + �y

2 + �z2)

1/2

It is well known that the higher values of dipole moment, molec-ular polarizability, and hyperpolarizability are important for moreactive NLO properties.

The first order hyperpolarizability (ˇ) and the component ofhyperpolarizability ˇx, ˇy and ˇz of m-FNBZ along with relatedproperties (�0, ˛0, and �˛) are reported in Table 13. The calculatedvalue of dipole moment is found to be 1.652680 Debye. The high-est value of dipole moment is observed for component �x. In thisdirection, this value is equal to 1.326747 Debye. m-FNBZ has notgot �z component of dipole moment that value is zero. The calcu-lated polarizability and anisotropy of the polarizability of m-FNBZis 12.495957 × 10−23 esu and 29.968644 × 10−23 esu, respectively.The magnitude of the molecular hyperpolarizability ˇ, is one ofimportant key factors in a NLO system. The B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p)calculated first order hyperpolarizability value (ˇ) for the titlemolecule is equal to 3.6725256 × 10−30 esu. Total dipole momentof title molecule is approximately equal those of urea. The firstorder hyperpolarizability of title molecule is approximately fivetimes than those of urea (� and of urea are 1.525686 Debye and0.780324 × 10−30 esu obtained by B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) method).

5. Conclusion

In the present work, the analyses have been made for vibrationalpattern of FT-IR and FT-Raman spectra, Total energy distribu-tion (TED), Zero-Point Vibrational Energies, Molecular electrostaticpotential (MEP) maps and Electronic properties of HOMO andLUMO. The fundamental frequencies are assigned and the com-putational calculations are performed by DFT (B3LYP, B3PW91and MPW1PW91) methods with 6−31++G(d,p) and 6−311++G(d,p)basis sets. The distortion of the structure of the compound due tothe substitutions of Fl and NO2 is discussed in detail. The Zero-PointVibrational Energies of the molecule are calculated and it is foundthat the ZPVE energy is much lower in the DFT/B3LYP method thanby other methods. The change of reactive sites for electrophilic andnucleophilic attack due to the substitutions is investigated from theMolecular Electrostatic Potential map. The first order hyperpolariz-ability (ˇ) and the component of hyperpolarizability are calculatedusing B3LYP/6−311++G(d,p) level and the importance related tothe NLO properties are discussed.

References

[1] http://www.inchem.org/documents/icsc/icsc/eics1633.htm.[2] http://www.chemsynthesis.com/base/chemical-structure.[3] www.jimmunol.org/content/156/5/1804.full.pdf.[4] M.A. Palafox, F.J. Melendez, Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 625

(2003) 17–21.[5] Q.G. Huang, L.R. Kong, Y.B. Liu, L.S. Wang, Relationships Between Molecular

Structure and Chromosomal Aberrations In Vitro Human Lymphocytes Inducedby Substituted Nitrobenzene, 1996.

[6] S. Ramalingam, S. Periandy, B. Elanchezhian, S. Mohan, Spectrochimica Acta,Part A 78 (2011) 429–436.

[7] V. Mukherjee, N.P. Singh, R.A. Yadav, Spectrochimica Acta, Part A 77 (2010)787–794.

[8] M. Karabacak, E. Kose, M. Kurt, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 41 (2010)1085–1097.

[9] W. Lewandowski, M. Kalinowska, H. Lewandowska, Inorganica Chimica Acta358 (2005) 2155–2166.

[10] N. Sundaraganesan, B. Anand, C. Meganathan, B.D. Joshua, Spectrochimica Acta,Part A 68 (2007) 561–566.

[11] D. Mahadevan, S. Periandy, M. Karabacak, S. Ramalingam, Spectrochimica Acta,Part A 82 (2011) 481–492.

[12] M. Karabacak, M. Cinar, A. Coruh, M. Kurt, Journal of Molecular Structure 919(2009) 26–33.

[13] I.F. Shishkov, L.V. Khristenko, L.V. Vilkov, S. Samdal, S. Gundersen, StructuralChemistry 14 (2) (2003) 151–157.

[14] V. Udayakumar, S. Periandy, M. Karabacak, S. Ramalingam, SpectrochimicaActa, Part A 83 (2011) 575–586.

[15] Z. Zhengyu, Du. Dongmei, Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 505(2000) 247–252.

[16] Z. Zhengyu, Fu. Aiping, Du. Dongmei, Journal of Quantum Chemistry 78 (2000)186–189.

[17] A.D. Becke, Physics Review A 38 (1988) 3098–3101.[18] C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Physics Review B 37 (1988) 785–790.[19] A.D. Becke, Journal of Chemical Physics 98 (1993) 5648–5652.[20] J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, Y. Wang, Physics Review B 54 (1996) 16533–16537.[21] D.C. Young, Computational Chemistry: A Practical Guide for Applying Tech-

niques to Real World Problems (Electronic), John Wiley and Sons Inc., NewYork, 2001.

[22] K. Burke, J.P. Perdew, Y. Wang, J.F. Dobson, G. Vignale, M.P. Das (Eds.), ElectronicDensity Functional Theory: Recent Progress and New Directions, Plenum Press,New York, 1998.

[23] C. Adamo, V. Barone, Journal of Chemical Physics 108 (1998) 664–668.[24] J. Baker, A.A. Jarzecki, P. Pulay, Journal of Physical Chemistry A 102 (1998)

1412–1424.[25] SQM Version 1.0, Scaled Quantum Mechanical Force Field, 2013 Green Acres

Road, 18 Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703.[26] E. Runge, E.K.U. Gross, Physical Review Letters 52 (1984) 997–1000.[27] R. Bauernschmitt, R. Ahlrichs, Chemical Physics Letters 256 (1996) 454–464.[28] M.J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian 03, Revision A.9, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, 2003.[29] V. Krishnakumar, V. Balachandran, T. Chithambarathan, Spectrochimica Acta,

Part A 62 (2005) 918–925.[30] L.J. Bellamy, The Infrared Spectra of Complex Molecules, Chapman and Hall,

London, 1975.[31] George Socrates, Infrared and Raman Characteristics Group Frequencies, third

ed., Wiley, New York, 2001.[32] N. Puviarasan, V. Arjunan, S. Mohan, Turkey Journal of Chemistry 26 (2002)

323.[33] G. Varsanyi, Vibrational Spectra of Benzene Derivatives, Academic Press, New

York, 1969.[34] V. Krishnakumar, R.J. Xavier, Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics 41

(2003) 597.[35] M. Silverstein, G. Clayton Bassler, C. Morrill, Spectrometric Identification of

Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1981.[36] T.F. Ardyukoiva, et al., Atlas of Spectra of Aromatic and Heterocyclic Com-

pounds, Nauka Sib. otd., Novosibirsk, 1973.[37] J. Mohan, Organic Spectroscopy – Principles and Applications, second ed.,

Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 2001.[38] D.N. Sathyanarayana, Vibrational Spectroscopy Theory and Application, New

Age International Publishers, New Delhi, 2004.[39] S. Ramalingam, S. Periandy, S. Mohan, Spectrochimica Acta, Part A 77 (2010)

73–81.[40] A.R. Prabakaran, S. Mohan, Indian Journal of Physics 63B (1989) 468–473.[41] D. Lin-Vien, N.B. Colthup, W.G. Fateley, J.G. Grasselli, The Handbook of Infrared

and Raman Characteristic Frequencies of Organic Molecules, Academic Press,Boston, MA, 1991.

[42] A.M. Asiri, M. Karabacak, M. Kurt, K.A. Alamry, Spectrochimica Acta, Part A 82(2011) 444–455.

[43] V.K. Rasdtogi, Surabhi Singhal, A. Pavan kumar, G. Ramano Rao, M.A. PalafoxIrena Kostova, Pure and Applied Physics 47 (Dec 2009) 844–851.

[44] V.J. Eatch, D. Steel, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 48 (1973) 446–449.[45] M.P. Kumpawat, A. Ojha, N.D. Patel, Canadian Journal of Spectroscopy 25 (1980)

1.[46] I.L. Tocon, M. Becucci, G. Pietraperzia, E. Castellucci, J.C. Otero, Journal of Molec-

ular Structure 565 (2001) 421–425.[47] M.S. Navti, M.A. Shashidar, Indian Journal of Physics 668 (1994) 371–373.[48] N. Sundaraganesan, C. Meganathan, B.D. Joshua, P. Mani, A. Jayaprakash, Spec-

trochimica Acta, Part A 71 (2008) 1134–1139.[49] S.I. Gorelsky, SWizard Program Revision 4.5, University of Ottawa, Ottawa,

Canada, 2010, http://www.sg.chem.net/.[50] S. Gunasekaran, R.A. Balaji, S. Kumaresan, G. Anand, S. Srinivasan, Canadian

Journal of Analytical Sciences and Spectroscopy 53 (2008) 149.


Recommended