Date post: | 18-Nov-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | svuniversity |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ERRATUM
Erratum to: Synthesis and antioxidant activity of a new class
of sulfone/sulfonamide-linked bis(oxadiazoles), bis(thiadiazoles),
and bis(triazoles)
Adivireddy Padmaja • Devanaboina Pedamalakondaiah •
Gundala Sravya • Guda Mallikarjuna Reddy •
Malaka Venkateshwarulu Jyothi Kumar • Ch. Appa Rao
Published online: 22 November 2014
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Erratum to: Med Chem Res
DOI 10.1007/s00044-014-1277-5
In the original version of this article, Ch. Appa Rao is
included in the acknowledgements section. He should
instead be credited as the final author of the article. His
name is now included in the author group.
The online version of the original article can be found under
doi:10.1007/s00044-014-1277-5.
A. Padmaja (&) � D. Pedamalakondaiah � G. Sravya �
G. M. Reddy
Department of Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University,
Tirupati 517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
e-mail: [email protected]
M. V. J. Kumar
Department of Biotechnology, Sri Venkateswara University,
Tirupati 517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
Ch. Appa Rao
Department of Bio-Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University,
Tirupati 517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
123
Med Chem Res (2015) 24:2021
DOI 10.1007/s00044-014-1301-9
MEDICINALCHEMISTRYRESEARCH
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Synthesis and antioxidant activity of a new class of sulfone/
sulfonamide-linked bis(oxadiazoles), bis(thiadiazoles),
and bis(triazoles)
Adivireddy Padmaja • Devanaboina Pedamalakondaiah •
Gundala Sravya • Guda Mallikarjuna Reddy •
Malaka Venkateshwarulu Jyothi Kumar
Received: 17 June 2014 / Accepted: 28 September 2014
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Abstract A new class of sulfone/sulfonamide-linked
bis(oxadiazoles), bis(thiadiazoles), and bis(triazoles) were
prepared from the synthetic intermediates sulfonyldiacetic
acid, arylsulfonylacetic acid hydrazide, and aryl-
aminosulfonylacetic acid hydrazide adopting simple and
versatile synthetic methodologies. All the new compounds
were tested for their antioxidant activity. Amongst all the
tested compounds, methyl-substituted bis(oxadiazoles) (8b
and 11b) were found to be potential antioxidant agents. It
was also observed that sulfonamide-linked bis(oxadiaz-
oles), bis(thiadiazoles), and bis(triazoles) showed compar-
atively higher antioxidant activity than sulfone-linked
bis(oxadiazoles), bis(thiadiazoles), and bis(triazoles).
Keywords Oxadiazole � Thiadiazole � Triazole �
Thiourea � Hydrazine hydrate
Introduction
The five-membered nitrogen-containing heterocycles 1,3,4-
oxadiazoles, 1,3,4-thiadiazoles, and 1,2,4-triazoles have
gained importance in medicinal chemistry as they constitute
the structural features of many bioactive compounds. 1,3,4-
Oxadiazoles exhibit antimicrobial, anticonvulsant, anti-
inflammatory, and analgesic activities (Jha et al., 2010;
Singh and Jangra, 2010) and are known to be mimetics
(Omar et al., 1996; Leung et al., 2005) of ester and amide
groups. Furthermore, 2,5-substituted 1,3,4-oxadiazole
derivatives also have been reported to show broad spectrum
of biological activities including anti-inflammatory, anal-
gesic and ulcerogenicity (Bhandari et al., 2008), and anti-
oxidant (Hamdi et al., 2011). In fact the antioxidants that
scavenge reactive oxygen species are of great value in pre-
venting the onset and propagation of oxidative diseases like
autoimmune, cardiovascular, neurovascular, etc. Literature
survey reveals that 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles have
been synthesized either by thermal/acid catalyzed cycliza-
tion of 1,2-diacylhydrazines (Liras et al., 2000) or by oxi-
dative cyclization of semicarbazone/hydrazone in the
presence of an oxidant (Gaonkar et al., 2006) or by micro-
wave irradiation of hydrazide and carboxylic acid mixture
(Khan et al., 2004). 1,3,4-Thiadiazole derivatives possess
multiple biological activities viz, anticancer (Elson et al.,
1988; Matysiak, 2007; Zou et al., 2011), antibacterial (Du
and Du, 2010), antifungal, and anti-inflammatory (Penning
et al., 1997). Most frequently used methods for the synthesis
of thiadiazoles include the reaction of acylthiosemicarbaz-
ides with acid reagents such as trifluoroacetic acid (Palaska
et al., 2002) andmethanesulfonic acid (Lutwick et al., 1979).
The important chemotherapeutics such as vorozole, letroz-
ole, and anastrozole contain 1,2,4-triazole ring and are cur-
rently being used for the treatment of breast cancer (Clemons
et al., 2004).One of the syntheticmethods for the preparation
of triazoles involves the use of N, N’-dimethyl formamide
dimethyl acetals (Stocks et al., 2004). Replacement of –O–
by –S– or –NH– in some heterocycles was reported viz.,
Bordners (Bordner, 1953) preparation of pyrroles from furan
Electronic supplementary material The online version of thisarticle (doi:10.1007/s00044-014-1277-5) contains supplementarymaterial, which is available to authorized users.
A. Padmaja (&) � D. Pedamalakondaiah � G. Sravya �G. M. Reddy
Department of Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University,
Tirupati 517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
e-mail: [email protected]
M. V. J. Kumar
Department of Biotechnology, Sri Venkateswara University,
Tirupati 517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
123
Med Chem Res
DOI 10.1007/s00044-014-1277-5
MEDICINALCHEMISTRYRESEARCH
and the transformation of epoxide to episulfides by the action
of thiocyanates or thiourea (Van Tamelen, 1951; Price and
Kirk, 1953; Culvenor, 1952). However, reports about the
conversion of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles to 1,3,4-thiadiazoles, and
1,2,4-triazoles are relatively less (Linganna and Lokanatha
Rai, 1998; Kiyoshi and Senji, 1960). The compounds with
good antioxidant activity are expected to possess anti-
inflammatory activity (Maheshwari et al., 2011). As such the
development of effective methods for the synthesis of a
variety of heterocycles and modification of oxadiazole motif
is of considerable importance in heterocyclic arena. Indeed,
we have synthesized a new class of bisheterocycles having a
variety of functional groups and studied their antioxidant
activity (Padmaja et al., 2011a, b; Padmavathi et al., 2011;
Padmaja et al., 2013; Padmavathi et al., 2009a, b). Prompted
by these observations and our continued interest in the
development of bioactive heterocycles, it is planned to
synthesize hitherto unknown sulfone/sulfonamide-linked
bis(oxadiazoles), bis(thiadiazoles), and bis(triazoles) and to
study their antioxidant activity.
Results and discussion
Chemistry
The synthetic scheme involves the preparation of target bis-
heterocycles from the synthetic intermediates arylsulfonyl-
acetic acid hydrazide (3)/arylaminosulfonylacetic acid
hydrazide (6), and sulfonyldiacetic acid (7). The compounds
3/6 were prepared by the reaction of arylsulfonylacetic acid
methyl ester (2)/arylaminosulfonylacetic acidmethyl ester (5)
with hydrazine hydrate in the presence of pyridine. The
compounds 2/5 were in turn obtained by the esterification of
arylsulfonylacetic acid (1)/arylaminosulfonylacetic acid (4)
with methanol in the presence of concentrated sulfuric
acid (Scheme 1). The cyclocondensation of 2 mol of
arylsulfonylacetic acid hydrazide (3)/arylaminosulfonylace-
tic acidhydrazide (6)with1 mol of sulfonyldiacetic acid (7) in
the presence of POCl3 resulted in bis((5-arylsulfonylmethyl)-
1,3,4-oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone (8)/bis((5-arylaminosulfo-
nylmethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone (11). Moreover,
bis((5-arylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone
(9)/bis((5-arylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazolylmeth-
yl)sulfone (12) were synthesized by the treatment of com-
pounds 8/11 with thiourea in THF. However, bis(5-
arylsulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethyl)sulfone
(10)/bis(5-arylaminosulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-1,2,4-triazol-
3-ylmethyl)sulfone (13) were obtained by the conversion of
compounds 8/11 with hydrazine hydrate in n-butanol
(Scheme 2). The 1HNMRspectra of 8a and 9a displayed two
singlets at d 4.55, 4.51 and 5.57, 5.43 due to methylene
protons attached to C-2 and C-5, whereas 10a presented two
singlets at 4.42 and 5.39 due tomethylene protons attached to
C-3 and C-5. In addition to these, a broad singlet was
observed at 5.69 ppm in compound 10a due to NH2. The
signal due to highly acidic protons disappeared when D2O
was added
On the other hand, the 1H NMR spectra of 11a and 12a
exhibited two singlets at d 4.86, 5.09 (CH2-(C-2)) and 5.11,
5.35 (CH2-(C-5)), in addition to these, a broad singlet was
observed at 10.45 and 10.34 ppm (NH),whereas 13a furnished
two singlets at 5.19 (CH2-(C-3)) and 5.43 (CH2-(C-5)). More-
over, two broad singlets observed at 5.68, 10.37 ppm were
assigned to NH2 and NH which disappeared on deuteration.
The structures of all the newly synthesized compounds were
further established by IR, 13C NMR, and elemental analyses.
Biological evaluation
Antioxidant activity
The compounds 8–13 were tested for antioxidant property
by DPPH, nitric oxide (NO), and hydrogen peroxide
SOO
R
O
OMeS
OO
R
OH
O
SOO
R
NH
O
NH2
SOO
NH
O
OMe
R
SOO
NH
OH
OR
SOO
NH
NH
O
NH2
R
21 3
MeOH / H2NNH2.H2O /
546
Pyridine / MeOH
(i)(ii)
Conc. H2SO4
i ii
i ii
R = a) H
b) Me
c) Cl
Scheme 1 Synthesis of arylsufonylacetic acid hydrazide and arylaminosufonylacetic acid hydrazide
Med Chem Res
123
R
SOO
SOO
S
NN
SOO
S
NN
R R
SOO
SOO
N
NN
SOO
N
NN
RNH
2NH
2
1 2
45 3
SOO
OH
O
OH
O
12
453
SOO
OH
O
OH
O
NH
SOO
SOO
O
NN
SOO
O
NN
NH
R R
NH
SOO
SOO
S
NN
SOO
S
NN
NH
R R
NH
SOO
SOO
N
NN
SOO
N
NN
NH
NH2
NH2
R R
1 2
45 312
453
1 24
53
12 5
3 4
NH2NH2.H2O/ n-Butanol
NH2CSNH2 / THF
POCl3(i)(ii)(iii)
R
SOO
SOO
O
NN
SOO
O
NN
R
1 24
53
12 53 4
+3
7
9 10
11
1213
+
7
R = a) H
b) Me
c) Cl
6
8
i
ii iii
i
ii iii
Scheme 2 Synthesis of sulfonyl- and sulfonamide-linked bis heterocycles
Table 1 The in vitro
antioxidant activity of 8–13 in
DPPH method
Values were the means of three
replicates ±SD
(–) Showed no scavenging
activity
Compounds Concentration
50 (lg/ml) 75 (lg/ml) 100 (lg/ml) IC50 (lg/ml)
8a 67.21 ± 0.14 69.34 ± 0.11 72.54 ± 0.19 37.19 ± 0.05
8b 76.91 ± 0.10 79.05 ± 0.28 81.43 ± 0.33 32.51 ± 0.03
8c 36.22 ± 0.34 38.24 ± 0.21 42.29 ± 0.39 69.02 ± 0.23
9a 42.22 ± 0.25 44.16 ± 0.08 47.82 ± 0.16 59.21 ± 0.12
9b 46.72 ± 0.17 48.95 ± 0.15 51.32 ± 0.21 53.51 ± 0.19
9c 22.29 ± 0.45 24.14 ± 0.36 26.40 ± 0.29 112.15 ± 0.25
10a 51.93 ± 0.41 54.26 ± 0.41 57.42 ± 0.11 48.14 ± 0.06
10b 58.94 ± 0.24 61.20 ± 0.20 64.07 ± 0.15 42.42 ± 0.10
10c 29.20 ± 0.27 30.12 ± 0.23 32.56 ± 0.35 85.61 ± 0.29
11a 70.45 ± 0.38 74.05 ± 0.32 76.91 ± 0.31 61.80 ± 0.26
11b 77.12 ± 0.18 80.41 ± 0.13 83.62 ± 0.12 32.42 ± 0.09
11c 39.14 ± 0.23 41.62 ± 0.19 45.90 ± 0.18 63.87 ± 0.16
12a 45.42 ± 0.42 47.14 ± 0.38 52.23 ± 0.25 54.92 ± 0.23
12b 50.35 ± 0.31 53.01 ± 0.34 55.46 ± 0.06 49.65 ± 0.03
12c 23.40 ± 0.19 25.39 ± 0.16 29.14 ± 0.09 106.83 ± 0.05
13a 55.14 ± 0.11 59.15 ± 0.25 62.81 ± 0.04 45.34 ± 0.78
13b 61.15 ± 0.20 64.27 ± 0.14 68.73 ± 0.25 40.88 ± 0.13
13c 31.29 ± 0.40 33.14 ± 0.19 36.32 ± 0.19 79.89 ± 0.41
Ascorbic acid 76.18 ± 0.17 78.29 ± 0.15 80.14 ± 0.10 32.82 ± 0.12
Blank – – – –
Med Chem Res
123
(H2O2) methods at 50, 75, and 100 lM concentration
(Tables 1, 2 and 3; Figs. 1, 2 and 3). The structure–activity
relationship of the tested compounds revealed that the
compounds having oxadiazole moieties (8 and 11) showed
higher radical scavenging activity when compared with
those having thiadiazole (9 and 12) and triazole (10 and 13)
Table 2 The in vitro
antioxidant activity of 8–13 in
NO method
Values were the means of three
replicates ±SD
(–) Showed no scavenging
activity
Compounds Concentration
50 (lg/ml) 75 (lg/ml) 100 (lg/ml) IC50 (lg/ml)
8a 70.61 ± 0.11 73.24 ± 0.08 76.0 ± 0.04 35.40 ± 0.22
8b 80.05 ± 0.09 82.14 ± 0.05 84.26 ± 0.02 31.23 ± 0.36
8c 39.32 ± 0.25 40.27 ± 0.22 43.48 ± 0.19 63.58 ± 0.47
9a 45.41 ± 0.23 48.12 ± 0.19 50.59 ± 0.14 55.05 ± 0.15
9b 51.17 ± 0.15 53.23 ± 0.12 56.45 ± 0.08 48.86 ± 0.69
9c 25.91 ± 0.28 29.90 ± 0.28 31.15 ± 0.25 96.49 ± 0.58
10a 59.13 ± 0.27 61.85 ± 0.25 64.02 ± 0.21 42.28 ± 0.67
10b 63.09 ± 0.18 65.72 ± 0.14 68.12 ± 0.10 39.63 ± 0.49
10c 32.20 ± 0.13 34.72 ± 0.11 37.08 ± 0.06 76.64 ± 0.28
11a 74.21 ± 0.29 77.08 ± 0.26 79.61 ± 0.23 33.68 ± 0.47
11b 82.55 ± 0.24 85.62 ± 0.27 87.34 ± 0.17 30.28 ± 0.98
11c 42.76 ± 0.20 46.11 ± 0.16 48.20 ± 0.13 58.47 ± 0.75
12a 50.07 ± 0.26 52.76 ± 0.30 54.23 ± 0.26 49.93 ± 0.66
12b 55.38 ± 0.34 58.72 ± 0.29 60.40 ± 0.28 45.15 ± 0.55
12c 29.66 ± 0.14 30.82 ± 0.10 34.19 ± 0.09 84.28 ± 0.43
13a 60.15 ± 0.08 64.29 ± 0.09 66.20 ± 0.03 41.56 ± 0.91
13b 66.80 ± 0.05 69.22 ± 0.03 71.47 ± 0.08 37.42 ± 0.37
13c 36.09 ± 0.22 39.18 ± 0.18 41.50 ± 0.12 69.27 ± 0.48
Ascorbic acid 79.42 ± 0.14 80.98 ± 0.11 83.42 ± 0.07 31.47 ± 0.88
Blank – – – –
Table 3 The in vitro
antioxidant activity of 8–13 in
H2O2 method
Values were the means of three
replicates ±SD
(–) Showed no scavenging
activity
Compounds Concentration
50 (lg/ml) 75 (lg/ml) 100 (lg/ml) IC50 (lg/ml)
8a 69.54 ± 0.18 73.91 ± 0.21 75.11 ± 0.29 35.95 ± 0.29
8b 78.15 ± 0.30 80.33 ± 0.19 82.09 ± 0.27 31.98 ± 0.36
8c 37.28 ± 0.34 40.02 ± 0.02 44.31 ± 0.34 67.06 ± 0.58
9a 44.16 ± 0.28 46.80 ± 0.04 49.27 ± 0.39 56.61 ± 0.47
9b 48.30 ± 0.11 50.22 ± 0.23 56.05 ± 0.04 52.05 ± 0.31
9c 25.10 ± 0.20 27.54 ± 0.08 30.01 ± 0.28 99.60 ± 0.48
10a 56.11 ± 0.29 59.31 ± 014 62.10 ± 0.12 44.55 ± 0.71
10b 60.62 ± 0.17 62.04 ± 0.13 67.98 ± 0.10 41.24 ± 0.18
10c 31.66 ± 0.13 33.19 ± 0.12 36.42 ± 0.44 78.96 ± 0.95
11a 72.12 ± 0.11 76.06 ± 0.03 79.23 ± 0.32 34.66 ± 0.86
11b 80.71 ± 0.23 83.20 ± 0.18 86.57 ± 0.21 30.97 ± 0.79
11c 41.07 ± 0.29 43.53 ± 0.16 47.01 ± 0.15 60.87 ± 0.65
12a 47.72 ± 0.26 49.17 ± 0.25 53.30 ± 0.23 52.39 ± 0.98
12b 52.13 ± 0.09 55.70 ± 0.28 59.21 ± 0.07 47.95 ± 0.70
12c 26.85 ± 0.24 30.60 ± 0.10 32.37 ± 0.13 93.11 ± 0.69
13a 59.05 ± 0.30 61.24 ± 0.09 64.81 ± 0.33 42.34 ± 0.59
13b 62.29 ± 0.26 67.35 ± 0.07 70.42 ± 0.41 40.13 ± 0.37
13c 33.29 ± 0.12 35.16 ± 0.18 39.43 ± 0.28 75.09 ± 0.51
Ascorbic acid 77.42 ± 0.06 79.69 ± 0.26 81.49 ± 0.17 32.29 ± 0.19
Blank – – – –
Med Chem Res
123
units in all the three methods. Further, it was noticed that
methyl substituted and unsubstituted compounds displayed
higher antioxidant activity than the corresponding chloro-
substituted compounds. In fact, the compounds 8b, 11b
exhibited antioxidant activity greater than the standard
Ascorbic acid. It was also observed that the compounds 8a,
9a, 9b and 10a, 10b, 11a, 12a, 12b, 13a, 13b exhibited
good antioxidant activity, whereas other compounds dis-
played low activity. Besides, the perusal of Tables 1, 2, 3
and Figs. 1, 2, 3 indicated that radical scavenging activity
increases with increase in concentration in all the three
methods. It was also observed that sulfonamide-linked bis
Fig. 1 The in vitro antioxidant
activity of 8–13 in DPPH
method
Fig. 2 The in vitro antioxidant
activity of 8–13 in NO method
Fig. 3 The in vitro antioxidant
activity of 8–13 in H2O2 method
Med Chem Res
123
heterocycles showed comparatively higher antioxidant
activity (11–13) than sulfone-linked bis heterocycles (8–
10).
Conclusion
A new class of sulfone/sulfonamide-linked bis(oxadiaz-
oles), bis(thiadiazoles), and bis(triazoles) were prepared
from the synthetic intermediates sulfonyldiacetic acid,
arylsulfonylacetic acid hydrazide, and arylaminosulfonyl-
acetic acid hydrazide. All the synthesized compounds were
evaluated for antioxidant activity. Amongst all the tested
compounds methyl-substituted bis(oxadiazoles) exhibited
excellent antioxidant activity. It was observed that com-
pounds having oxadiazole moiety displayed higher radical
scavenging activity than those having thiadiazole and tri-
azole units. Further, it was noticed that sulfonamide-linked
bis heterocycles showed comparatively higher antioxidant
activity than sulfone-linked bis heterocycles.
Experimental protocols
Melting points were determined in open capillaries on a
Mel-Temp apparatus and are uncorrected. The purity of the
compounds was checked by TLC (silica gel H, BDH, ethyl
acetate-hexane, 1:4). The IR spectra were run on a Thermo
Nicolet IR 200 FT-IR spectrometer as KBr pellets and the
wave numbers were given in cm-1. The 1H NMR spectra
were determined in CDCl3/DMSO-d6 on a Jeol JNM
operating at 400 MHz. The 13C NMR spectra were recor-
ded in CDCl3/DMSO-d6 on a Jeol JNM spectrometer
operating at 100 MHz. All chemical shifts are reported in d
(ppm) using TMS as an internal standard. The High-Res-
olution mass spectra were recorded on Micromass Q-TOF
micromass spectrometer using electrospray ionization. The
microanalyses were performed on Perkin-Elmer 240C
elemental analyzer. The antioxidant property was deter-
mined using Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer. The
starting compound 3 and 6 were prepared as per literature
procedure (Padmavathi et al., 2009a, b; Padmaja et al.,
2011a, b).
General method for preparation of bis((5-
arylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazolylmethyl) sulfone
(8a–c)/bis((5-arylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone (11a–c)
A mixture of arylsulfonylacetic acid hydrazide (3a–c)/a-
rylaminosulfonylacetic acid hydrazide (6a–c) (0.002 mol),
sulfonyldiacetic acid (7) (0.001 mol) and POCl-3 (5 mL)
were refluxed on a heating mantle for 6–9 h. The excess
POCl-3 was removed under vacuum and the residue was
poured onto crushed ice. The separated solid was filtered,
washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, and
then with water. It was dried and recrystallized from ethanol.
Bis((5-phenylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazolylmethyl)
sulfone 8a
White solid, mp 173–175 �C, yield 67 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 1572 (C=N), 1320, 1136 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.31–7.92 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 5.57
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.55 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-2));13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 158.3 (C-5), 157.2 (C-2), 54.8
(CH2-(C-5)), 52.4 (CH2-(C-2)), 139.8 136.9, 130.6, 129.9,
(aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 561.0184 [M?Na]. Anal.
Calcd for C20H18N4O8S-3: C, 44.60; H, 3.36; N, 10.40 %.
Found: C, 44.68; H, 3.40; N, 10.55 %.
Bis((5-(4-methylphenylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 8b
White solid, m.p. 182–184 �C, yield 65 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 1577 (C=N), 1315, 1134 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.26–7.86 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.51
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.49 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-2)), 2.52 (s, 6H,
Ar–CH3);13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 157.8 (C-5),
156.4 (C-2), 53.5 (CH2-(C-5)), 51.8 (CH2-(C-2)), 23.9 (Ar–
CH3), 138.7, 136.5, 130.1, 129.4 (aromatic carbons);
HRMS: (m/z) 589.0497 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for
C22H22N4O8S-3: C, 46.63; H, 3.91; N, 9.88 %. Found: C,
46.58; H, 3.89; N, 10.00 %.
Bis((5-(4-chlorophenylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 8c
White solid, m.p. 199–101 �C, yield 70 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 1583 (C=N), 1324, 1140 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.56–7.97 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.65
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.64 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-2));13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 159.7 (C-5), 158.4 (C-2), 55.2
(CH2-(C-5)), 52.9 (CH2-(C-2)), 140.2, 137.1, 132.9, 130.8
(aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 628.9405 [M?Na]. Anal.
Calcd for C20H16Cl2N4O8S3: C, 39.54; H, 2.65; N, 9.22 %.
Found: C, 39.61; H, 2.67; N, 9.39 %.
Bis((5-phenylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 11a
White solid, m.p. 162–164 �C, yield 67 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3227 (NH), 1572 (C=N), 1315,1160 (SO2);1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.31 (bs, 1H, NH),
7.11–7.69 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 5.11 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.86
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-2));13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d
158.0 (C-5), 157.3 (C-2), 49.7 (CH2-(C-5)), 44.3 (CH2-(C-
Med Chem Res
123
2)), 135.6, 129.4, 120.5, 117.9 (aromatic carbons). HRMS:
(m/z) 591.0402 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H20N6O8S3:
C, 42.25; H, 3.55; N, 14.78 %. Found: C, 42.20; H, 3.59;
N, 14.94 %.
Bis((5-(4-methylphenylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 11b
White solid, m.p. 156–158 �C, yield 65 %; IR (KBr) (cm-1):
3224 (NH), 1565 (C=N), 1312, 1155 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.02 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.03–7.59 (m,
8H,Ar–H), 5.06 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.69 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-2)),
2.27 (s, 6H, Ar–CH3);13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d
155.1 (C-5), 154.5 (C-2), 48.4 (CH2-(C-5)), 42.8 (CH2-(C-
2)), 21.9 (Ar–CH3), 134.2, 128.2, 120.1, 117.1, (aromatic
carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 619.0715 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for
C22H24N6O8S3: C, 44.29; H, 4.05; N, 14.09 %. Found: C,
44.38; H, 4.08; N, 14.27 %.
Bis((5-(4-chlorophenylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
oxadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 11c
White solid, m.p. 177–179 �C, yield 69 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3235 (NH), 1580 (C=N), 1318,1169 (SO2);1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.45 (bs, 1H, NH),
7.17–7.71 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.25 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 5.02 (s,
4H, CH2-(C-2));13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 159.7
(C-5), 158.1 (C-2), 50.9 (CH2-(C-5)), 47.6 (CH2-(C-2)),
137.6, 130.2, 122.4, 118.4 (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/
z) 658.9623 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H18Cl2N6O8S3:
C, 37.68; H, 2.85; N, 13.18 %. Found: C, 39.95; H, 2. 89;
N, 14.02 %.
General method for preparation of bis((5-arylsulfonylm-
ethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazolylmethyl) sulfone (9a–c)/Bis((5-ary-
laminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone
(12a–c)
The compound 8a–c/11a–c (0.001 mol), thiourea
(0.004 mol), and tetrahydrofuran (8 mL) were taken in a
sealed tube and heated at 120–150 �C in an oil bath for
18–23 h. After the reaction was completed, it was extracted
with dichloromethane. The organic layer was washed with
water, brine solution, and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4.
The solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator and the
resultant solid was recrystallized from 2-propanol.
Bis((5-phenylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 9a
White solid, m.p. 187–189 �C, yield 75 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 1574 (C=N), 1315, 1138 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.29–7.88 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 5.43
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.51 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-2)),;13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 157.9 (C-5), 156.8 (C-2), 53.7
(CH2-(C-5)), 51.5 (CH2-(C-2)), 138.4 134.5, 129.9, 129.2
(aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 592.9728 [M?Na]. Anal.
Calcd for C20H18N4O6S5: C, 42.09; H, 3.18; N, 9.82 %.
Found: C, 42.20; H, 3.20; N, 9.95 %.
Bis((5-(4-methylphenylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 9b
White solid, m.p. 193–195 �C, yield 72 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 1571 (C=N), 1323, 1135 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.22–7.84 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.34
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.38 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-2)), 2.49 (s, 6H,
Ar–CH3);13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 156.5 (C-5),
155.6 (C-2), 53.4 (CH2-(C-5)), 50.8 (CH2-(C-2)), 24.2 (Ar–
CH3), 135.2, 133.7, 129.6, 128.4 (aromatic carbons).
HRMS: (m/z) 628.0041 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for
C22H22N4O6S5: C, 44.13; H, 3.70; N, 9.36 %. Found: C,
44.07; H, 3.69; N, 9.46 %.
Bis((5-(4-chlorophenylsulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 9c
White solid, m.p. 206–208 �C, yield 77 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 1578 (C=N), 1330, 1142 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.35–7.84 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.61
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.62 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-2));13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 158.5 (C-5), 157.2 (C-2), 54.6
(CH2-(C-5)), 51.9 (CH2-(C-2)), 139.5, 137.2, 132.9, 129.8
(aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 660.8948 [M?Na]. Anal.
Calcd for C20H16Cl2N4O6S5: C, 37.55; H, 2.52; N, 8.75 %.
Found: C, 37.65; H, 2.57; N, 8.91 %.
Bis((5-phenylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 12a
White solid, m.p. 164–168 �C, yield 73 %; IR (KBr) (cm-1):
3228 (NH), 1575(C=N), 1305, 1162 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.39 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.14–7.68 (m,
10H, Ar–H), 5.35 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 5.09 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-
2)); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 158.8 (C-5), 157.7
(C-2), 51.8 (CH2-(C-5)), 43.5 (CH2-(C-2)), 138.4, 128.5,
119.2, 116.5 (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 622.9946
[M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H20N6O6S5: C, 39.99; H, 3.36;
N, 13.99 %. Found: C, 39.95; H, 3.38; N, 14.20 %.
Bis((5-(4-methylphenylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 12b
White solid, m.p. 161–163 �C, yield 71 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3236 (NH), 1559 (C=N), 1324, 1139 (SO2);1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.34 (bs, 1H, NH),
7.11–7.62 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.27 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 5.07 (s,
Med Chem Res
123
4H, CH2-(C-2)), 2.29 (s, 6H, Ar–CH3);13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 159.6 (C-5), 158.2 (C-2), 50.7
(CH2-(C-5)), 42.8 (CH2-(C-2)), 21.9 (Ar–CH3), 132.3,
129.5, 126.9, 116.1 (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z)
651.0251 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C22H24N6O6S5: C,
42.02; H, 3.85; N, 13.37 %. Found: C, 42.13; H, 3.90; N,
13.54 %.
Bis((5-(4-chlorophenylaminosulfonylmethyl)-1,3,4-
thiadiazolylmethyl)sulfone 12c
White solid, m.p. 173–175 �C, yield 76 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3250 (NH), 1573 (C=N), 1336,1151 (SO2);1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.42 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.81 (m,
8H, Ar–H), 5.41 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 5.18 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-
2)); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 159.5 (C-5), 158.6
(C-2), 51.5 (CH2-(C-5)), 44.2 (CH2-(C-2)), 129.8, 128.1,
124.2, 117.5 (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 690.9166
[M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H18Cl2N6O6S5: C, 35.87; H,
2.71; N, 12.55 %. Found: C, 35.92; H, 2.74; N, 12.70 %.
General method for preparation of bis(5-arylsulfonylmethyl
(4-amino)-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethyl)sulfone (10a–c)/
Bis(5-arylaminosulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-1,2,4-
triazol-3-ylmethyl)sulfone (13a–c)
To a solution of compound 8a–c/11a–c (0.001 mol) in n-
butanol (5 mL), hydrazine hydrate (0.004 mol) was added
and refluxed for 7–10 h. Then KOH (0.002 mol) was added
to the reaction media and the precipitate formed was fil-
tered. The solid obtained was acidified with conc. HCl to
pH 3 and washed with water. It was dried and recrystallized
from ethanol.
Bis(5-phenylsulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-1,2,4-triazol-3-
ylmethyl)sulfone 10a
White solid, m.p. 179–181 �C, yield 69 %; IR (KBr) (cm-1):
3332, 3441 (NH2), 1575 (C=N), 1327,1137 (SO2);1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.24–7.42 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 5.69
(bs, 4H, NH2), 5.39 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.42 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-
3)); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 156.2 (C-5), 155.3
(C-3), 53.5 (CH2-(C-5)), 51.2 (CH2-(C-3)), 138.8, 134.6,
129.7, 128.2 (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 589.0722
[M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H22N8O6S3: C, 42.39; H, 3.91;
N, 19.78 %. Found: C, 42.48; H, 3.93; N, 19.98 %.
Bis(5-(4-methyl)phenylsulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-1,2,4-
triazol-3-ylmethyl)sulfone 10b
White solid, m.p. 190–192 �C, yield 67 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3326, 3433 (NH2), 1570 (C=N), 1322,1130 (SO2);
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.21–7.59 (m, 8H, Ar–
H), 5.62 (bs, 4H, NH2), 5.31 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.32 (s, 4H,
CH2-(C-3)), 2.45 (s, 6H, Ar–CH3);13C NMR (100 MHz,
DMSO-d6): d 154.9 (C-5), 153.8 (C-3), 52.4 (CH2-(C-5)),
50.7 (CH2-(C-3)), 23.6 (Ar–CH3), 137.6, 135.9, 130.2, 128.6
(aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 617.1035 [M?Na]. Anal.
Calcd for C22H26N8O6S3: C, 44.43; H, 4.41; N, 18.84 %.
Found: C, 44.51; H, 4.40; N, 18.94 %.
Bis(5-(4-chloro)phenylsulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-1,2,4-
triazol-3-ylmethyl)sulfone 10c
White solid, m.p. 203–205 �C, yield 74 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3335, 3446 (NH2), 1580 (C=N), 1334,1145 (SO2);1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 7.36–7.98 (m, 8H, Ar–
H), 5.74 (bs, 4H, NH2), 5.47 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 4.49 (s,
4H, CH2-(C-3));13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 158.1
(C-5), 157.5 (C-3), 53.8 (CH2-(C-5)), 51.6 (CH2-(C-3)),
139.5, 137.1, 130.4, 128.9, (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/
z) 656.9943 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H20Cl2N8O6S3:
C, 37.80; H, 3.17; N, 17.63 %. Found: C, 37.92; H, 3.23;
N, 17.86 %.
Bis(5-phenylaminosulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-1,2,4-triazol-
3-ylmethyl)sulfone 13a
White solid, m.p. 184–186 �C, yield 69 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3433, 3445 (NH2), 3230 (NH), 1570 (C=N),
1318,1144 (SO2);1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d
5.19 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-3)), 5.43 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 5.75
(bs, 4H-NH2), 7.19–7.72 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 10.37 (bs, 1H,
NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 159.6 (C-5),
158.2 (C-3), 52.0 (CH2-(C-5)), 47.2 (CH2-(C-3)), 129.1,
127.4, 118.2, 116.9 (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z)
619.0940 [M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H24N10O6S3: C,
40.26; H, 4.05; N, 23.47 %. Found: C, 40.32; H, 4.08; N,
23.66 %.
Bis(5-(4-methyl)phenylaminosulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-
1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethyl)sulfone 13b
White solid, m.p. 175–177 �C, yield 64 %; IR (KBr) (cm-1):
3427, 3436 (NH2), 3225 (NH), 1566 (C=N), 1314, 1141
(SO2);1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.40 (bs, 1H,
NH), 7.28–7.94 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.38 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 5.20
(s, 4H, CH2-(C-3)), 2.40 (s, 6H, Ar–CH3),;13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 160.8 (C-5), 159.6 (C-3), 51.6
(CH2-(C-5)), 45.3 (CH2-(C-3)), 22.8 (Ar–CH3), 134.1, 130.6,
128.4, 116.2, (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 647.1253
[M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C22H28N10O6S3: C, 42.30; H, 4.52;
N, 22.42 %. Found: C, 42.37; H, 4.47; N, 22.54 %.
Med Chem Res
123
Bis(5-(4-chloro)phenylaminosulfonylmethyl(4-amino)-
1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethyl)sulfone 13c
White solid, m.p. 193–195 �C, yield 71 %; IR (KBr)
(cm-1): 3437, 3449 (NH2), 3239 (NH), 1576 (C=N),
1326,1155 (SO2);1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.43
(bs, 1H, NH), 7.29–7.89 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 5.81 (bs, 4H-NH2),
5.41 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-5)), 5.12 (s, 4H, CH2-(C-3));13C
NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 159.5 (C-5), 158.6 (C-3),
51.9 (CH2-(C-5)), 44.8 (CH2-(C-3)), 134.7, 129.2, 124.5,
118.8 (aromatic carbons). HRMS: (m/z) 687.0161
[M?Na]. Anal. Calcd for C20H22Cl2N10O6S3: C, 36.09; H,
3.33; N, 21.04 %. Found: C, 37.20; H, 3.36; N, 21.20 %.
Antioxidant activity
The compounds 8–13 were evaluated for antioxidant
property by DPPH (Burits and Bucar, 2000; Cuendet et al.,
1997), nitric oxide (Green et al., 1982; Marcocci et al.,
1994), and H2O2 (Ruch et al., 1989) methods.
2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical
scavenging activity
The hydrogen atom or electron donation ability of the
compounds was measured from the bleaching of the purple-
colored methanol solution of 2,2,-diphenyl-1-picrylhy-
drazyl radical (DPPH). The spectrophotometric assay uses
the stable radical DPPH as a reagent. To 4 ml of 0.004 %
w/v methanol solution of DPPH, 1 ml of various concen-
trations of the test compounds (50, 75, and 100 lg/ml) in
methanol were added. After 30 min incubation period at
room temperature, the absorbance was read against blank at
517 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as the standard. The percent
of inhibition (I%) of free radical production from DPPHwas
calculated by the following equation
I% ¼ Acontrol�Asample
� �
=Ablank
� �
� 100;
where Acontrol is the absorbance of the control reaction
(containing methanolic DPPH and Ascorbic acid), Asample
is the absorbance of the test compound (containing meth-
anolic DPPH and test compound), and Ablank is the absor-
bance of the blank (containing only methanolic DPPH).
Tests were carried out in triplicate.
The IC50 was calculated by the following equation
IC50 in l g =ml ¼ 50 � 100 =% Inhibition,
IC50 in lmol =ml ¼ % of the IC50=
M:Wt: of the compound:
Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging activity
Sodium nitroprusside (5 lM) in phosphate buffer pH 7.4
was incubated with different concentrations (50, 75, and
100 lg/ml) of test compounds dissolved in a suitable sol-
vent (dioxane/methanol) and tubes were incubated at 25 �C
for 120 min. Control experiment was conducted with equal
amount of solvent in an identical manner. At intervals,
0.5 ml of incubation solution was taken and diluted with
0.5 ml of Griess reagent (1 % Sulfanilamide, 0.1 % N-
naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride and 2 % o-
phosphoric acid dissolved in distilled water). The absor-
bance of the chromophore formed during diazotization of
nitrite with sulfanilamide and subsequent N-naphthylethy-
lenediamine dihydrochloride was read at 546 nm. The
experiment was repeated in triplicate. Nitric oxide scav-
enging activity was calculated by the following equation
% of scavenging ¼ ðAcontrol� Asample½ Þ =Ablank�� 100;
where Acontrol is the absorbance of the control reaction (con-
taining all reagents and Ascorbic acid), Asample is the absor-
bance of the test compound (containing all reagents and test
compound), and Ablank is the absorbance of the blank (con-
taining only reagents). Tests were carried out in triplicate.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging activity
The H2O2 scavenging ability of the test compound was
determined according to the method of A solution of H2O2
(40 mm) was prepared in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). 50,
75, and 100 lg/ml concentrations of the test compounds in
3.4 ml phosphate buffer were added to H2O2 solution
(0.6 ml, 40 mm). The absorbance value of the reaction
mixture was recorded at 230 nm. Ascorbic acid was used
as the standard. The percent of scavenging of H2O2 was
calculated by the following equation
% of scavenging ¼ Acontrol�Asample
� �
=Ablank
� �
� 100;
where Acontrol is the absorbance of the control reaction (con-
taining all reagents and Ascorbic acid), Asample is the absor-
bance of the test compound (containing all reagents and test
compound), and Ablank is the absorbance of the blank (con-
taining only reagents). Tests were carried out in triplicate.
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to Council of Scientific
and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi for financial assistance
under major research project. One of the authors G. Sravya is thankful
to University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi for the sanction
of UGC-BSR fellowship. The authors are also thankful to Prof. Ch.
Appa Rao, Department of Bio-Chemistry, S.V.University, Tirupati,
for providing facilities to carry out the antioxidant activity.
References
Bhandari SV, Bothara KG, Raut MK, Patil AA, Sarkate AP, Mokale
VJ (2008) Design, synthesis and evaluation of anti-inflamma-
tory, analgesic and ulcerogenicity studies of novel S-substituted
Med Chem Res
123
phenacyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thiol and schiff bases of diclofenac
acid as nonulcerogenic derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem
16:1822–1831
Bordner CA (1953) US Patent, 2, 600, 689, June 10, 1952, Chem
Abstr 47: 4373
Burits M, Bucar F (2000) Antioxidant activity nigella sativa essential
oil. Phytother Res 14:323–328
Clemons M, Coleman RE, Verma S (2004) Aromatase inhibitors in
the adjuvant setting: bringing the gold to a standard. Cancer
Treat Rev 30:325–332
Cuendet M, Hostettmann K, Potterat O, Dyatmiko W (1997) Iridoid
glucosides with free radicalscavenging properties from fagraea
blumei. Helv Chim Acta 80:1144–1152
Culvenor CC, Davies W, Savige WE (1952) The conversion of
ethylene oxides into ethylene sulphides. J Chem Soc 4480–4486
DuHT,DuHJ (2010)Synthesis and biological activity of 6-(substituted)-
3-(3,4,5- trimethoxyphenyl)-1,2,4-triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole.
Chin J Org Chem 30:137–141
Elson PJ, Kvols LK, Vogl SE, Glover DJ, Hahn RG, Trump DL,
Carbone PP, Earle JD, Davis TE (1988) Phase II trials of 5-day
vinblastine infusion (NSC 49842), L-alanosine (NSC 153353),
acivicin (NSC 163501), and aminothiadiazole (NSC 4728) in
patients with recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Invest
New Drugs 6:97–103
Gaonkar SL, Rai KML, Prabhuswamy B (2006) Synthesis and
antimicrobial studies of a new series of 2-4-(2-(5-ethylpyridin-2-
yl)ethoxy)phenyl-5-substituted-1,3,4-oxadiazoles. Eur J Med
Chem 41:841–846
Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishnok JS,
Tannenbaum SR (1982) Analysis of nitrate, nitrite and [15 N]
nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem 126:131–138
Hamdi N, Passarelli V, Romerosa A (2011) Synthesis, spectroscopy
and electrochemistry of new 4-(4-acetyl-5-substituted-4,5-dihy-
dro-1,3,4-oxadizol-2-yl)methoxy)-2H-chromen-2-ones as novel
class of potential antibacterial and antioxidant derivatives. C R
Chimie 14:548–555
Jha KK, Samad A, Kumar Y, Shaharyar M, Khosa RL, Jain J, Kumar
V, Singh P (2010) Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of
1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 45:4963–4967
Khan KM, Ullah Z, Rani M, Perveen S, Haider SM, Choudhary MI,
Rahman A, Voelter W (2004) Microwave-assisted synthesis of
2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-oxadiazoles. Lett Org Chem 1:50–52
Kiyoshi F, Senji T (1960) Studies on the synthesis of 3-alkyl-5, 6, 7,
8-tetrahydro-s-triazolo [4, 3-b] [1, 2, 4] triazine-6,7-diones.
Chem Pharm Bull 8:908–912
Leung D, Du W, Hardouin C, Cheng H, Hwang I, Cravatt BF, Boger
DL (2005) Discovery of an exceptionally potent and selective
class of fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors enlisting proteome-
wide selectivity screening: concurrent optimization of enzyme
inhibitor potency and selectivity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 15:
1423–1428
Linganna N, Lokanatha Rai KM (1998) Transformation of 1,3,4-
oxadiazoles to 1,3,4-thiadiazoles using thiourea. Synth Commun
28:4611–4617
Liras S, Allen MP, Segelstein BE (2000) A mild method for the
preparation of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles: triflic anhydride promoted
cyclization of diacylhydrazines. Synth Commun 30:437–443
Lutwick LI, Rytel MW, Yanez JP, Galgiani JN, Stevens DA (1979)
Deep infections from petriellidium boydii treated with miconaz-
ole. J Am Med Assoc 241:272–273
Maheshwari R, Chawla P, Saraf S (2011) Comparison between
antioxidant activity of 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles con-
taining heteroaromatic ring and aromatic ring at 2nd position.
Med Chem Res 20:1650–1655
Marcocci L, Maguire JJ, Droy-Lefaix MT, Packer L (1994) The nitric
oxide scavenging properties of ginkgo biloba extract EGb761.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 201:748–755
Matysiak J (2007) Evaluation of electronic, lipophilic and membrane
affinity effects on antiproliferative activity of 5-substituted-2-
(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles against various human
cancer cells. Eur J Med Chem 42:940–947
Omar FA, Mahfouz NM, Rahman MA (1996) Design, synthesis and
anti-inflammatory activity of some 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives.
Eur J Med Chem 31:819–825
Padmaja A, Muralikrishna A, Rajasekhar C, Padmavathi V (2011a)
Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of pyrrolyl/pyrazolyl aryl-
aminosulfonylmethyl 1,3,4-oxadiazoles, 1,3,4-thiadiazoles and
1,2,4-triazoles. Chem Pharm Bull 59:1509–1517
Padmaja A, Rajasekhar C, Muralikrishna A, Padmavathi V (2011b)
Synthesis and antioxidant activity of oxazolyl/thiazolylsulfonyl-
methyl pyrazoles and isoxazoles. Eur J Med Chem 46:
5334–5338
Padmaja A, Mallikarjuna Reddy G, Muralikrishna A, Padmavathi V
(2013) synthesis and antioxidant activity of styrylsulfonylmethyl
1,3,4-oxadiazoles, pyrazolyl/isoxazolyl- 1,3,4-oxadiazoles.
Chem Pharm Bull 61:1291–1297
Padmavathi V, Mahesh K, Nagendramohan AV, Padmaja A (2009a)
Synthesis and bioassay of oxazolyl/thiazolyl selenadiazoles,
thiadiazoles and diazaphospholes. Chem Pharm Bull 57:561–566
Padmavathi V, Sudhakar Reddy G, Padmaja A, Kondaiah P, Ali-
Shazia (2009b) Synthesis, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities
of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles, 1,3,4-thiadiazoles and 1,2,4-triazoles. Eur J
Med Chem 44:2106–2112
Padmavathi V, Premakumari C, Venkatesh BC, Padmaja A (2011)
Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of amido linked pyrrolyl and
pyrazolyl-oxazoles, thiazoles and imidazoles. Eur J Med Chem
46:5317–5326
Palaska E, Sahin G, Kelecin P, Durlu NT, Altinok G (2002) Synthesis
and anti-inflammatory activity of 1-acylthiosemicarbazides,
1,3,4-oxadiazoles, 1,3,4-thiadiazoles and 1,2,4-triazole-3-thi-
ones. Il Farmaco 57:101–107
Penning TD, Talley JJ, Bertenshaw SR, Carter JS, Collins PW, Docter
S, Graneto MJ, Lee LF, Malecha JW, Miyashiro JM, Rogers RS,
Rogier DJ, Yu SS, Anderson GD, Burton EG, Cogburn JN,
Gregory SA, Koboldt CM, Perkins WE, Seibert K, Veenhuizen
AW, Zhang YY, Isakson PC (1997) Synthesis and biological
evaluation of the 1,5-diarylpyrazole class of cyclooxygenase-2
inhibitors: identification of 4-[5-(4-methyl phenyl)-3-(trifluoro-
methyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]benzenesulfonamide(SC-58635, cele-
coxib). J Med Chem 40:1347–1365
Price CC, Kirk PF (1953) Some observations on the reaction of alkali
thiocyanates with epoxides. J Am Chem Soc 75:2396–2400
Ruch RJ, Cheng SJ, Klaunig JE (1989) Prevention of cytotoxicity and
inhibition of intercellular communication by antioxidant cate-
chins isolated from chinese green tea. Carcinogenesis
10:1003–1008
Singh P, Jangra PK (2010) A variety of sulfonamidomethane linked
1,3,4-oxadiazoles and 1,3,4-thiadiazoles were. Der Chemica
Sinica 1:118–123
Stocks MJ, Cheshire DR, Reynolds R (2004) Efficient and regio-
specific one-pot synthesis of substituted 1,2,4-triazoles. Org Lett
6:2969–2971
Van Tamelen EE (1951) The formation and ring-opening of alkene
sulfides. J Am Chem Soc 73:3444–3448
Zou XJ, Zhang SW, Liu Y, Liu ZM, Gao JW, Song QL, Pan Y, Zhang
JZ, Li XJ, Lai LH (2011) Anti-tumor metastasis and crystal
structure of N1-(1, 3, 4-thiadiazole-2-yl)-N3-m-chlorobenzoylu-
rea. Chin J Struct Chem 30:1001–1005
Med Chem Res
123