+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The yeasts of cheese brines

The yeasts of cheese brines

Date post: 10-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: independent
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
International Journal of Food Microbiology, 11 (1990) 289-304 289 Elsevier FOOD 00340 The yeasts of cheese brines H. Seiler and M. Busse Institute of Bacteriology, South German Dairy Research Center, Freising-Weihenstephan, F.R.G. (Received 17 October 1989; revision received 25 May 1990; accepted 13 June 1990) A total of 365 yeasts were isolated from the brines of soft, semihard and hard cheeses from different manufacturers. Identification was based on 131 characteristics, primarily employing a method with microtitration plates. Most brines exhibited a characteristic yeast flora. The predominant strains proved to be mainly Debaryomyces hansenii and Candida oersatilis. In a few brines Trichosporon beigelii, C. rugosa, C. intermedia, Kluyoeromyces marxianus, Saccharomyces sp. and C. tenuis/polymorpha were predominant. Also of importance were C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. zeylanoides, Issatchenkia orientalis and Geotrichum klebahnii. Not all strains could be clearly identified. Lists of characters are provided for subdividing D. hansenii and T. beigelii. The specificity of the yeast flora of brines is assumed to contribute to the sensory variety of cheeses. Key words: Yeast; Cheese brine; Cheese rind; Identification; Numerical taxonomy Introduction Cheese is usually salted by brining. This procedure helps to remove excessive whey, stimulates the formation of rind, and has a regulative and selective effect on the microbial populations. The consistency of cheeses, their ripening, flavor, taste and keeping quality are all favorably influenced (Kammerlehner, 1986; Lenoir, 1984). Yeasts, as a part of the microflora of the cheese surface, play an important role in ripening of some cheese varieties. As the most typical example red smear cheeses shall be mentioned. According to Sauter (1986) , the development of the final surface flora entirely depends on the breakdown of lactic acid by the yeasts because salt tolerant coryneform bacteria, including Brevibacterium linens, will not grow at a pH below 5.7. Hence the viable cell count of aerobic bacteria on the rind of brick cheese smears does not exceed the cell count of yeasts until the 6th to 9th day. Yeasts - owing to their slightly proteolytic and lipolytic activity - form sub- stances which stimulate growth of the lactic acid bacteria and of the aerobic bacteria on the cheese surfaces, they ferment residual lactose, influence flavor formation by Correspondence address: Herbert Seiler, Technische Universit~it Mi~nchen, Siiddeutsche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt fur Milchwirtschaft Bakteriologisches Institut, VSttingerstrasse 45, D-8050 Freising- Weihenstephan, F.R.G. 0168-1605/90/$03.50 © 1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)
Transcript

International Journal of Food Microbiology, 11 (1990) 289-304 289 Elsevier

FOOD 00340

The yeasts of cheese brines

H. Seiler and M. Busse Institute of Bacteriology, South German Dairy Research Center, Freising-Weihenstephan, F.R.G.

(Received 17 October 1989; revision received 25 May 1990; accepted 13 June 1990)

A total of 365 yeasts were isolated from the brines of soft, semihard and hard cheeses from different manufacturers. Identification was based on 131 characteristics, primarily employing a method with microtitration plates. Most brines exhibited a characteristic yeast flora. The predominant strains proved to be mainly Debaryomyces hansenii and Candida oersatilis. In a few brines Trichosporon beigelii, C. rugosa, C. intermedia, Kluyoeromyces marxianus, Saccharomyces sp. and C. tenuis/polymorpha were predominant. Also of importance were C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. zeylanoides, Issatchenkia orientalis and Geotrichum klebahnii. Not all strains could be clearly identified. Lists of characters are provided for subdividing D. hansenii and T. beigelii. The specificity of the yeast flora of brines is assumed to contribute to the sensory variety of cheeses.

Key words: Yeast; Cheese brine; Cheese rind; Identification; Numerical taxonomy

Introduction

Cheese is usual ly sal ted by br ining. This p rocedu re helps to remove excessive whey, s t imulates the fo rma t ion of rind, and has a regula t ive and selective effect on the microb ia l popu la t ions . The consis tency of cheeses, their r ipening, flavor, tas te and keeping qual i ty are all f avorab ly inf luenced (Kammer l ehne r , 1986; Lenoir , 1984).

Yeasts, as a pa r t of the mic rof lo ra of the cheese surface, p l ay an i m p o r t a n t role in r ipen ing of some cheese varieties. As the mos t typica l example red smear cheeses shall be ment ioned . Accord ing to Sauter (1986) , the d e v e l o p m e n t of the f inal surface f lora ent i re ly depends on the b r e a k d o w n of lact ic acid b y the yeas ts because salt to lerant co rynefo rm bacter ia , inc luding Brev ibac ter ium linens, will not grow at a p H below 5.7. Hence the v iable cell count of aerobic bac te r i a on the r ind of b r ick cheese smears does not exceed the cell count of yeas ts unt i l the 6th to 9th day.

Yeasts - owing to their s l ightly p ro teo ly t i c and l ipoly t ic ac t iv i ty - fo rm sub- s tances which s t imula te growth of the lact ic acid bac te r i a and of the ae rob ic bac te r i a on the cheese surfaces, they ferment res idual lactose, inf luence f lavor fo rma t ion by

Correspondence address: Herbert Seiler, Technische Universit~it Mi~nchen, Siiddeutsche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt fur Milchwirtschaft Bakteriologisches Institut, VSttingerstrasse 45, D-8050 Freising- Weihenstephan, F.R.G.

0168-1605/90/$03.50 © 1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)

290

producing volatile acids and carbonyl compounds and prevent cheese surfaces to form a ' t oad skin' (Siewert, 1986). Geotrichum candidum is said to increase evapora- tion of water by virtue of aerial mycelium formation, thus promoting the formation of rind in cheeses which contain too much whey (Lacto-Labo, 1986).

On the other hand, yeasts can also be responsible for defects in cheese. Excessive yeast growth will cause the rind to become soft and smeary, resulting in poor development of other members of the surface flora, e.g. growth of Penicillium caseicolum on cheese of the camembert type (Krapf, 1987). This condition is usually associated with an unpleasant yeasty or esterlike odor. In rare cases excessive proteolytic and lipolytic activity will cause the surface of the cheeses to run off. In hard cheese ripened in plastic bags discolorations of the rind due to yeasts have been observed.

It is an open question whether the yeast flora of brines significantly influences immature cheeses. It is usually assumed that the yeasts of the salt brine are essential for ripening. However, very little is known on these subjects. To obtain further information, as a first step, the yeast flora of cheese brines has been studied. Furthermore, this study will contribute to a reliable system for the identification of cheese yeasts. The data could form a basis for selecting the best suitable yeasts as starter cultures for the ripening of cheese.

Materials and Methods

Brine samples

The yeasts were isolated from brines of cheese varieties Limburger, Romadur, Camembert , Tilsiter and Emmentaler. The brines originated from 11 different dairies ( A - K ) in Southern Bavaria, F.R.G.

Microbial counts

The brine or the cheese mass scraped off from the rind was transferred to a sterile bottle and diluted about ten times in sterile tap water, treated with an Ultra Turrax to give an even suspension, and tenfold dilutions were prepared. The yeast counts were recorded on yeast extract glucose chloramphenicol bromphenol blue agar (YGCB agar: 0.5 g yeast extract, 2 g glucose, 0.01 g chloramphenicol, 2 g NaC1, 0.001 g bromphenol blue, 1.5 g agar, 100 ml demineralized water, p H 6.0-6.4) at 27°C. For maintenance and storage of pure yeast cultures, yeast extract malt extract agar (YM agar: 0.3 g yeast extract, 0.3 g malt extract, 0.5 g casein peptone, 1 g glucose, 1.5 g agar, 100 ml demineralized water, pH 6.0-6.4) was used with incubation at 27 ° C and storage at refrigeration.

Tests carried out Microtitration plates were used for examination of utilization of carbon sources,

utilization of nitrogen sources, cycloheximide resistance, growth without vitamins, growth with NaC1 and urease activity (Seiler and Busse, 1988). For the remaining

291

physiological tests standard methods for yeast identification were used (Kreger-van Rij, 1984).

All isolates were examined for their production of a killer factor, as described by Philliskirk and Young (1975). The sensitive test strain, Saceharomyces cerevisiae 381, was kindly provided by Dr. P. Pfeiffer, University of Mainz.

Ascospore formation was examined on McClary's acetate agar, potato glucose agar, Gorodkowa agar, corn meal agar, malt extract agar and 2% glucose-yeast autolysate agar (Kreger-van Rij, 1984). The plates were incubated at 18-22°C for 4 weeks.

Colony morphology was examined on Wort agar (Merck), pH 5.5. The plates were incubated at 27°C for 2 weeks.

For investigation of cell morphology potato dextrose agar (Merck) was used. The Dalmau plate technique (Kreger-van Rij, 1984) was applied with incubation at 27°C for 2 weeks.

Numerical grouping The methods used were described in a previous paper (Seiler, 1983). As reference

material for the identifications we used the data provided by Barnett et al. (1983).

Results and Discussion

The yeast counts of the brines investigated varied considerably. In most cases the concentrations per ml were between 1 x 10 4 and 1 x l0 s. The lowest value was approximately 5 x 10 2 and the highest about 1 x 10 6. The reasons for this variation were differences in the age and condition of the salt brines. Some brines looked quite clear, while others were turbid, or even with a thick layer of a fat-casein mixture floating on the surface. In one dairy (plant A) experiencing problems with Mucor spp., the brine was heated up to 85-90°C for 45 s once a week, using slaked lime after cooling to precipitate the protein. Only the clear supernatant was reused. With the exception of brine from one dairy (plant G), none of the 11 dairies had inoculated either the brine or the cheese with yeast cultures. The salt brine from plant G contained yeast cultures selected for their distinctive flavor. The salt concentration in the various plant brines was 19-20% (w/w), the temperatures varied between 13 and 16°C, and pH ranged from 4-6.

A total of 365 yeast strains were isolated from the brines, with care being taken to include representatives of all colony types. The quantitative share of all colony types was also recorded. The strains were tested for 131 characters. All strains were positive for the characters growth without inositol, p-aminobenzoic acid and riboflavin and growth at 25 and 30°C. The strains were all negative for the characters growth at 42°C, utilization of glucuronate, methanol, ethanol, tartaric acid, adipic acid, D-fUcose and glycogen, and for the formation of starch, acetic acid and ascospores. With the exception of glucose, the fermentation characters tested were not included in the evaluation (i.e. gas from galactose, maltose, methyl-D-glu- coside, sucrose, trehalose, melibiose, lactose, cellobiose, melezitose, raffinose, inulin

292

and starch). It was found that, if a strain was principally able to ferment, the results obtained in the fermentation tests were the same as those obtained in the corre- sponding assimilation tests. The diazonium blue B reaction (Barnett et al., 1983) was not determined because it is positively correlated with the decomposition of urea. This resulted in 103 characters to be used for the taxonomic grouping.

The phenogram for the 365 isolates and 46 reference strains from international yeast collections is shown in Fig. 1. The 365 strains isolated are clustered in 23 groups of varying size. Debaryomyces hansenii formed the largest group with 83 strains (groups 1 and 7), followed by Trichosporon beigelii (44 isolates), Candida rugosa (25 isolates), C. oersatilis (24 isolates), C. polymorpha (20 isolates), C. parapsilosis (17 isolates), Issatchenkia orientalis (15 isolates), C. tropicalis (13 isolates), C. tenuis (12 isolates), C. intermedia (12 isolates) and Saccharomyces sp. (11 isolates). All other species were represented by less than 10 isolates. These included yeast genera that are typical representatives of the yeast flora of milk and milk products, such as Geotrichum, Kluyueromyces or Torulaspora.

Identification was carried out by comparing the test results with the table of Barnett et al. (1983) in 70 characters. Although morphological data were established for all strains, they only served as identification criteria in cases where several species exhibited the same degree of similarity based on numerical comparison.

For all characteristics used Table I gives a detailed picture of the frequencies of positive reactions for the groups shown in Fig. 1. The quality of the identifications varied considerably. Group 1 was clearly identified as D. hansenii, although only one strain showed no deviation from Barnett's data (1983). The majority of strains exhibited 1 to 4 differences. The species next in order of similarity were C. tenuis, C. sake, C. intermedia, and Metschnikowia bicuspidata. As D. hansenii appears to be a highly heterogeneous yeast species (Haridi, 1987), some characters which might be valuable for internal subgrouping are listed in Table II. As can be seen, these are primarily colony morphology and utilization of erythritol, amygdalin, D-gluco- samine or D-ribose.

Identification of group 2 presented considerable difficulties. In group 2a C. polymorpha was cited as the species with the greatest similarity, followed by C. tenuis, C. atrnospherica, D. hansenii and M. bicuspidata. The strains of group 2b exhibited the highest physiological similarities to C. tenuis. The species with similar characteristics were C. atmospherica, D. hansenii, C. fennica, M. bicuspidata and Pichia nakazawae.

Group 3 was identified as (7,. intermedia. The differences as compared to D. hansenii were minor.

Identification proved to be difficult in group 4, too. The species C. parapsilosis and C. haemulonii are possible candidates with roughly the same level of similarity.

Fig. 1. Condensed phenogram based on simple matching coefficient and average linkage sorting 365 isolates from cheese brines and 46 reference strains tested for 103 characters. Figures in parentheses indicate the culture collection number of a reference strain clustered together with isolates. DSM = Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen, Braunschweig, F.R.G.; CBS = Centraalbureau voor Schim-

melcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands.

% Distance

,,~6.37.~8.~4.2° ~ 6 ~2. ~ , ~ , Phe- No. of , i nmn strains

46 ) 17

I I

10 5

20 12

i 12 17

i i

13 6 3 4 i

i i i 4 I I i I I 1 I i i I

31 6 5 i i 1 i

10 10 1

I la 4 11b 10

I 12 5

1 ]

1 25

5 I0

3 15

i 8 I I I i 9

15 I i 9 I i

~ | 2 2 6 i ]

1 I

24 1 I 1

[ , ~ 2 3

t ' • , , , . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .

36 32 28 24 20 16 12 8 4

Presumptive i d e n t i f i c a t i o n Debaryomgces hansen i i (DSM 3428) Debaryomgces hansenii

Debaryomyces hansenii DSM 7 0 2 3 8

Debargomyces hansenii CBS 1 1 7 Debaryomyces hansenii

Debaryomyces hdnsenii Candida parapsilosis

Candida tenuis

Debar~om~ces hansen]l

Candida intermedia

Candida tropicalis

Candida albicans ATCC 10231 Candida albicans

Candida polymorpha

Clavispora lusitaniae (CDS 6936) Debargom~ces hansenii

Debaryomyces hansenii (DSM 70244) Hyphopichia burtonii CBS 2352

Hansenula polymorpha C8S 7831 Candida diddensiae COS 2214 Pichia farinosa CDS 185 Rhodotorula glutinis

Rhodotorula mucilaginosa

Rhodotorula mucilagonosa

Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Rhodotorula mucilaginosa

Crgptococcus laurentii

Cryptococcus laurentii CDS 571 Crgptococcus humicolus CDS 57] cryptococcus humicolus

Cr~ptococcus humicolus

Crgptococcus humicolus

Trichosporon boigelii Trichosporon beigelii

Trichosporon belgelii

Trichosporon beigelii

Trichosporon beigelii

Trichosporon beigelii CBS 2466 Lipomyces tetrasporus CRS 5910 Klugveromgces l a c t i s (CBS 2360; DSM 70807) Klugveromyces lactds x. ma. CBS 712; DSM 70292, 70343, 70804 K. mar×ianus (CBS 397; DSM 70344) un ident i f ied 11ansenula jadinii Dekkera intermedia CDS 4914 un ident i f ied Candida kefyr DI Candida rugosa

Pichia dlspora (CDS 6639) Geotrichum klebahnii (DSM 1240) Geotrichum capitatum

Issat~lenkia orientalis Candida zeylanoides CDS 619 Candida zeglanoides

Candlda sake CDS 159 Zggosaccharomgces rouxii CDS 441 Candida versatilis CDS 1752 Torulaspora delbrueckii CBS 1146 T, dcl. (DSM 70497, 70504, 70607; CBS I146) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CDS 1464" DSH 1333,

70471, 70509, 70514, 7047~, 70547, s. cez. 70449, 70470, 70511; P. 381, 967) s . sp. Saccharomyce: spp, Saccharomgces sp. un ident i f ied Yarrowia lipolgtica

Yarrowia lipolytica Yarrowia lipolytica CDS 6124-i u n i d e n t i f i e d u n i d e n t i f i e d Caf~dJda versatJlis

un ident i f ied un ident i f ied un ident i f ied

293

294

TABLE I

Frequency of positive characters, expressed as percentage positive in the phenons 1 through 7, 9 through 15, and 17 through 23 as described in Fig. 1

Phenon: 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 No. of strains: 80 20 12 12 17 13 6 7 44 11

Morphology:

Colony red 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0

Colony brown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Colony smooth 73 100 100 100 24 92 100 43 0 100

Colony rough 27 0 0 0 76 0 0 57 7 0

Colony slimy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mycelium produced 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 93 0

Pellicle formed 33 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 93 0 Pseudohyphae 0 0 0 8 88 100 83 29 100 36

Septate hyphae 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 14 95 0 Carbon sources:

D-Galactose 100 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Maltose 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

x~-Sorbose 67 0 33 92 100 100 100 71 18 55

Cellobiose 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 82

fl-Gentibiose 94 100 100 100 0 69 17 100 100 91 Lactose 97 0 0 100 0 0 17 0 100 91

Melibiose 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 9

Sucrose 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Trehalose 100 50 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Turanose 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98 100 Melezitose 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 89 100

Raffinose 56 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 91 D-Glucono-l,5-1act. 1 0 0 25 100 100 100 86 82 9

N-Ac.-D-glucosamine 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 D-Glucosamine 77 0 100 100 94 100 100 100 98 9

Amygdaline 13 15 0 0 12 15 83 14 27 18 Methyl-D-glucoside 99 100 100 83 100 100 100 100 98 100

Salicin 95 100 100 100 6 100 67 100 86 100 Arbutin 94 90 100 100 6 100 100 100 100 100

Inulin 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 Starch 0 0 0 17 12 15 17 14 5 0

L-Arabinose 87 100 100 8 94 0 0 100 95 0 D-Arabinose 1 0 58 8 0 0 0 86 23 0

L-Lyxose 3 30 67 92 12 100 17 86 36 9 D-Ribose 49 95 100 0 0 15 17 14 100 0

L-Rhamnose 65 45 100 0 0 0 67 57 43 9 L-Xylose 0 30 67 67 0 0 0 0 27 0 D-Xylose 80 100 100 100 100 100 83 100 100 27 L-Arabitol 47 95 100 0 0 0 0 57 27 0

D-Arabitol 80 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 9 55 Erythritol 61 95 100 0 0 0 0 29 68 9

Inositol 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 Dulcitol 32 0 0 50 0 0 0 100 5 0

D-Sorbitol 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 32 91 D-Mannitol 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 77 91 Ribitol 91 100 100 100 100 100 83 100 2 9 Xylitol 56 15 50 25 12 62 83 100 11 36

295

11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14 5 25 5 10 15 8 9 15 9 6 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 71 100 76 LOO 0 67 75 100 73 100 33 100 29 0 24 0 0 33 25 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 24 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 50 0

100 100 100 20 100 100 100 0 67 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0

100 0 72 0 100 0 0 56 67 100 17 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 33 93 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 88 22 13 67 17 4 93 100 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 50 80 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 50 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 46

100 100 0 0 0 0 0 89 87 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 89 60 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 33 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 11 33 0 0 4

100 100 0 0 0 0 0 89 67 0 0 8 29 100 0 60 50 0 88 56 7 11 100 96 0 20 0 0 0 93 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 20 0 67 50 0 0 0 17 0 64 20 24 0 80 40 50 33 40 78 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 40 0 0 0 64 100 4 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 100 86 100 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 22 0 96 100 0 0 0 10 0 13 89 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 20 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 17 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 93 100 60 0 100 27 0 0 0 0 17 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 86 20 0 40 20 0 100 33 20 0 100 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 79 0 100 80 100 0 100 67 0 0 50 13 71 0 100 80 90 0 100 44 13 0 100 92 50 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 33 100 0 40 0 0 0 13 22 0 0 0 96

296

TABLE I (continued)

Phenon: 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 No. of strains: 80 20 12 12 17 13 6 7 44 11

Carbon sources:

2,3-Butanediol 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 82 Glycerol 97 100 100 8 88 8 100 86 34 45

1,3-Propanediol 27 0 8 8 82 69 100 86 100 0

D-Gluconate 27 50 100 17 100 77 33 43 100 0

2-keto-D-Gluconate 100 0 58 100 100 100 100 100 89 0

5-keto-D-Gluconate 0 0 0 0 6 62 0 0 93 0 Acetate 47 30 100 100 59 92 100 57 27 82

Ascorbate 0 0 0 0 0 8 17 0 77 0

Citrate 91 20 92 100 94 85 100 100 18 0

DE-Lactate 53 0 0 0 0 0 33 14 98 100 DL-Malate 11 12 92 92 59 92 100 71 9 64

Succinate 52 90 100 100 100 100 100 100 36 100

Nitrogen sources: Nitrate 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nitri te 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 Acetamide 68 100 92 92 100 100 100 100 86 45 Butylamine 96 90 92 92 100 100 100 100 100 100

Diethylamine 1 0 0 0 47 31 33 14 0 0 Ethylamine 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Trimethylamine 37 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 73 55

Cadaverine 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Choline 4 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 0

Creatine 41 10 8 0 12 0 0 29 0 0

Creatinine 23 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 L-Arginine 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

DL-Citrulline 97 75 92 92 100 100 100 100 100 100

L-Leucine 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 L-Lysine 100 100 100 100 41 100 100 100 100 100

L-Ornithine 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 L-Proline 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 DL-Threonine 97 65 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Growth without: Amino acids 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Biotin 0 0 10 0 0 0 33 14 7 64

Bio t in+Thiamine 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 55 Folic acid 100 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 91

Niacin 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 36

Pantothenate 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 91 Pyridoxine 99 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100

Thiamine 100 100 33 75 100 100 0 100 2 91 Vitamins 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 0

Growth wi th /a t : 4 ° C 99 10 100 100 71 8 100 86 5 64 37 o C 1 5 0 0 94 100 100 86 89 64

0.01% Cyclohex. 1 0 0 0 29 69 0 86 98 100 0.1% Cyclohex. 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 86 11 100 50% Glucose 100 45 8 8 100 92 100 100 11 100

297

11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

14 5 25 5 10 15 8 9 15 9 6 24

93 80 36 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 17 13

79 100 16 100 100 100 100 56 0 100 100 100 0 20 0 40 50 0 25 0 0 0 50 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 50 11 0 0 100 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 17 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 0

29 100 4 80 40 47 38 0 7 0 17 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

21 100 0 0 0 0 88 0 13 0 33 0 100 100 52 20 100 93 0 100 53 11 100 0 50 100 4 80 80 20 0 0 0 0 83 0

100 100 20 100 100 100 25 0 7 0 100 0

0 0

71 100

0 100 71

100 7 0 0

100 100 100 100 100 93

100

100 50 50

100 14 71 93

100 0

100 86

100 100

51

100 4 0 0 0 100 4 0 0 0 100 96 80 80 100 100 88 100 100 100 80 0 0 0 67

100 100 100 100 100 100 36 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 8 20 100 100

0 0 0 10 I 0 0 20 0 0

100 100 100 100 100 100 96 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 96 100 100 100 100 96 100 100 100 100 96 100 100 100 100 72 100 90 100

0 0

100 100

0 100 100

88 88 0 0

100 100 100 88

100 100 100

100 13 0

100 100 100 100 100

0

100 0

100 100 50

0 0 0 0 0 0

78 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 78 33 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 100 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 89 0 0

100 100 0 100 100 0

89 93 0

0 0

100 100

0 100 100 100

33 0

17 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

100 100

17 100 100 100 100

17 17

100 0

100 100

17

96 0 0 0 0

96 0

96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

100 100

0 0 0

100 100 0 80 0 0

88 100 100 100 16 100 0 0 4 0 0 0

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

90 0

100 100

0

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

40 100

0 0

93

100 100 100 11 7 0 11 7 0

100 100 100 100 100 100 89 73 78

100 100 100 100 93 56

11 0 0

21 0 0

100 100 100 96 54 0

36 0 100 20

0 0 0 0

92 0

100 20 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 87 100

0 0

67 58 88

298

TABLE I (continued)

Phenon: 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 No. of strains: 80 20 12 12 17 13 6 7 44 11

60% Glucose 95 20 0 0 100 85 100 100 0 73

5% NaCI 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

10% N a C I + 5% Glc. 99 100 100 100 100 92 100 100 30 100

15% NaCI 97 100 100 100 100 54 33 100 0 0

Hydrolysis of:

Casein (1%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 0

Gelat in (0.4%) 27 10 0 0 6 8 33 29 91 0 Gelat in (12%) 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 14 82 0

Skin milk (50%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Starch 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 64 0

Tween 80 77 55 92 92 82 92 0 71 89 0 Urea 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 100 0

Glucose fermentaton 27 15 83 100 100 100 100 100 7 100

Killer factor 29 0 0 0 0 62 67 0 0 55

Less likely are the species which come next in order of similarity, C diddensiae, D. hansenii, C. sake and M. bicuspidata.

The strains of group 5 were classified as C. tropicalis, although they might also be C. haemulonii or C. maltosa. Species M. reukauffii, C. oleophila and D. hansenii were named on the next highest level of similarity.

The strains of group 6 (Clavispora lusitaniae) were physiologically very similar to D. hansenii, M. reukauffii, M. bicuspidata and M. lunata.

Groups 7 ( D. hansenii), 8 ( Rhodotorula glutinis or R. mucilaginosa), 9 (Tri- chosporon beigeilii), 10 and 11 (Kluyverornyces marxianus), 12 ( P. jadinii), 16 (G. capitatum), 18 (C. zeylanoides), 19 (Torulaspora delbrueckii), 20 (S. cerevisiae), 22 (Yarrowia lipolytica) and 23 (Candida versatilis) could all be clearly identified.

The species most similar to group 13 was C. rugosa. However, always reveafing 4 to 6 differences between the characteristic data determined by us and those of Barnett et al. (1983), it is not surprising that in the comparison by computer several other species were indicated for the next similarity level (Zygosaccharomyes rouxii, P. rnembranaefaciens, Z. bailii, Z. bisporus, C. apis, C. magnoliae, M. bicuspidata, T. delbrueckii, S. cerevisiae, C apiculata and C. silvae ).

Group 14 had an almost equal degree of physiological similarity to the species P. dispora, C silvae, C. vini and S. cerevisiae. The reference strain P. norvegensis CBS 6639 was included at 14% aberration. However, in the computer-aided identification this species name appeared only on the second highest similarity level. The species names P. kluyveri and P. membranaefaciens were listed before it.

Group 15 was identified as G. klebahnii, G. penicillaturn or G. armillariae, although strain G. candidum DSM 1240 had established itself there. The reason for this identification was a negative test result that we rated as deviation as against a

299

11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14 5 25 5 10 15 8 9 15 9 6 24

0 0 84 0 0 40 13 100 47 100 0 88 100 80 96 100 100 100 100 100 87 100 100 100

14 40 16 0 10 80 75 100 47 100 100 100 0 20 0 0 0 27 0 44 7 100 33 100

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 13 0 0 11 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 0

100 100 4 80 0 100 13 100 100 0 0 79 57 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0

d e l a y e d r e a c t i o n ( D ) a c c o r d i n g t o B a r n e t t ( 1 9 8 3 ) . I f n o d e v i a t i o n h a d b e e n r e c o r d e d

i n t h e s e c a s e s - a s f o r i n s t a n c e i n B a r n e t t ' s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s o f t w a r e ( B a r n e t t e t a l . ,

1 9 8 5 ) - t h e g r o u p c o n c e r n e d w o u l d h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d a s G. candidum. T h i s s h o w s

t h a t t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n is n o t o n l y d e p e n d e n t u p o n t h e r e f e r e n c e d a t a b u t a l s o o n t h e

s p e c i f i c p r o g r a m u s e d .

TABLE I1

Characters which differentiate the Debaryomyes hansenii phenons

Phenon: l a lb lc ld 7a 7b No. of strains: 46 18 10 5 3 4

Morphology: Colony smooth 91 a 94 0 0 100 0 Colony rough 9 6 100 100 0 100 Pellicle formed 24 0 100 100 0 0

C / N sources: D-Glucosamine 91 94 20 0 100 100 D-Ribose 84 6 0 0 0 25 L-Rhamnose 80 39 80 0 33 75 Raffinose 47 100 0 80 100 100 Erythritol 100 6 10 0 33 25 D-Gluconate 9 78 0 60 67 25 Amygdaline 9 6 0 100 33 0 Trimethylamine 22 67 70 0 100 100

Hydrolysis of: Tween 80 93 67 10 100 33 100

Glucose fermentation 11 56 0 100 100 100 Killer factor 0 89 30 80 0 0

a Frequency of positive strains expressed as a percentage.

300

TABLE III

Characters which differentiate the Trichosporon beigelii-phenons

Phenon: 9a 9b 9c 9d No. of strains: 31 6 5 2

C/N sources: o-Arabinose 13 a 17 100 0 L-Rhamnose 39 33 100 0 L- Lyxose 13 50 100 0 D-Lyxose 35 17 80 0 Amygdaline 26 0 80 0 Glycerine 26 0 100 100 Erythritol 61 100 100 0 Xylitol 0 0 100 0 L-Arabitol 10 67 100 0 D-Arabitol 0 0 80 0 Sorbitol 35 0 20 100 Dulcitol 0 0 0 100 I nositol 42 0 20 100 Succinate 29 0 100 100 Citrate 0 100 0 100 Ascorbate 84 17 100 100 Nitrite 42 100 100 0 Trimethylethane 87 83 0 0

Hydrolysis of: Gelatine (12%) 90 50 100 0 Tween 80 100 17 100 100

Growth without Biotine 0 0 20 100

a Frequency of positive strains expressed as a percentage.

The species Issatchenkia orientalis and Pichia membranaefaciens indica ted on the highest similarity level in group 17 cannot be dis t inguished on the basis of

physiological data. All efforts to locate ascospores were in vain. The ident i ty of this

group must therefore remain open. Species with very similar physiology are I.

occidentalis and L scutulata. Strains of group 21 must be assigned to the species S. cereuisiae, S. dairensis or a

Saccharornyces species not yet described.

Aside f rom D. hansenii, only T. beigelii was divided into several subclusters.

Characters suitable for d i f ferent ia t ion are shown in Table III.

In another numerica l analysis our data were compared with a shor tened vers ion

of Barnet t ' s table (1983). The table included only species which, according to data

by Deak and Beuchat (1987), are typical of milk and milk products . Our analysis

yielded essentially the same species. Except ions were M. bicuspidata (cluster 2a) and

C. zeylanoides (group 15). For ty -one characters that were largely either posi t ive or negat ive in the individual

groups were selected and again compared with Barnet t ' s data (1983) . As it tu rned

out, the qual i ty of ident i f icat ion was not substant ial ly lower. An ident i f ica t ion key

T A B L E IV

Yeast species isolated f rom soft cheese brines and an exper imenta l br ine

301

Yeast Dai ry

A Ba a Bb C D E1 b E 2 E 3 E 4 F (G) ':

C a n d i d a i n t e r m e d i a + d _ _ _ + + + . . . . .

C a n d i d a p a r a p s i l o s i s - + + . . . . . . .

C a n d i d a t e n u i s /

p o l y m o r p h a - + + + + + . . . . . . .

C a n d i d a t r o p i c a l i s . . . . . . + . . . .

C a n d i d a v e r s a t i l i s - - - + + - + + + + + + + + + + - -

C l a v i s p o r a l u s i t a n i a e . . . . . . . + - - -

D e b a r y o m y c e s h a n s e n i i - + + + + + + + . . . . . + + + -

G e o t r i c h u m k l e b a h n i i . . . . . . . + + - -

K l u y v e r o m y c e s m a r x i a n u s + + + . . . . . . . . . .

S a c c h a r o m y c e s sp. - . . . . . . . . . + + +

T r i c h o s p o r o n b e t g e l i i + - + - - + + + + + + - -

a Ba = first sample; B b = second sample af ter 10 months .

b E 1 _ E 4 = four different br ines in dairy E.

c (G) = an exper imenta l brine.

d + + + = 50-100%; + + = 30-49%; + = 1 0 - 2 9 % ; -- = 0 -9% of the total yeast flora.

based on this set of characters was suggested previously (Seiler and Busse, 1988). The set of characters corresponding to Barnett's data (1983) was expanded to include the characters assimilation of D-lyxose, D-turanose, gentibiose, N-acetyl-t)- glucosamine and D-arabitol. For differentiating more clearly between physiologi- cally very similar species it might also prove useful to test for the characters growth at 37 and 42°C.

The quantitative data as to the size of the clusters for the various species in Fig. 1 do not reflect the actual conditions in the brines. These are shown in Tables IV and V. As can be seen in Table IV, D. hansenii was by no means always predominant on soft cheese. In the case of dairy B, C. tenuis/polymorpha and C. parapsilosis were found in addition to D. hansenii; the second analysis after 10 months showed only minor differences compared to the first one. In dairy C we isolated C. versatilis, a species also predominant in all brines of dairy E. The brines of dairies A, D, F and G contained only one type of yeast each (K. marxianus, C. intermedia, D. hansenii, Saccharomyces sp.). Significant quantities of T. beigelii were present only in the brines 1 and 2 of dairy E.

Species D. hansenii and C. versatilis were predominant also in the brines of semihard and hard cheese (Table V). In dairy I only C. rugosa was found, while dairy L contained a large number of different yeast species in roughly equal quantities. The yeast floras of cheese rinds I and J did not correspond to the respective brines. Interestingly, these cheeses did not meet production standards. Further detailed studies would be required to determine the degree of correspon- dence between the yeasts in the brines and the yeast flora on the rinds of cheese,

302

TABLE V

Yeast species isolated from semi-hard and hard cheese brines and cheese rinds

Yeast Dairy Cheese rind

A~ a E~ F. Hh b | h J h K h L h 1 J

Candida parapsilosis _ c Candida rugosa Candida tenuis / polymorpha - Candida versatilis Candida zeylanoides Debaryomyees hansenii lssatchenkia orientalis Kluyveromyces marxianus Pichia jadinii Torulaspora delbrueckii Trichosporon beigelii

w _ ~ _ _

- - + - - + + + - - + - -

- - + + - - + + + + + + - -

. . . . . + + +

+ + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + +

- - + - - + - - _

_ _ _ -1- _

. . . . . -}- _

. . . . +

- - + . . . . + - -

" s = semi-hard cheese brine. b h = hard cheese brine. c + + + = 50-100%; + + = 30-49%; + =10-29%; - = 0-9% of the total yeast flora.

and to clarify whether there are any t ime-changes in the yeast popula t ions occurr ing

on the rinds.

C o n c l u s i o n s

Yeast species found in br ines are more or less the same reported for the yeast flora of cheese r ind (Siewert, 1986). However, there is one exception. In br ines C.

versatilis dominates quite often. This apparent ly does not apply to the cheese rind. Other yeasts typical for br ines are D. hansenii, C. rugosa, T. beigelii and C. polymorpha . T h e yeast flora in br ines of different dairies seems to be quite specific. In two cases brines of a given dairy were analysed repeatedly. In these cases the

composi t ion of the yeast flora varied only slightly. As to the quest ion whether br ines are an impor tan t source for the yeast flora of

cheese, very little can be said at the moment . Compara t ive studies on cheese and br ine are necessary. Our material included only two comparisons with faulty hard cheeses r ipened in plastic bags. In these cases the yeast flora of the cheeses differed significantly from the flora of the brines. Evidently, yeast con tamina t ion of br ines are derived from immature cheese and dairy equipment . Since, however, immature cheese, r ipening cheese and brines differ in their ecology, the typical yeast flora of

those three biotops most p robab ly may have specific traits. Some manufac turers market starter cultures conta in ing K. marx ianus or D.

hanseni i , either to be sprayed on the cheese or added to the solut ions used as inoculum. It remains to be clarified whether this might promote un i formi ty in the cheese aroma. It seems quite conceivable that it is precisely the great differences i n

303

the yeast flora observed between the brines of different cheese dairies that represent an essential part of the sensory variety of cheeses.

References

Barnett, J.A., Payne, R.W. and Yarrow, D.Y. (1983) Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge.

Barnett, J.A., Payne, R.W. and Yarrow, D.Y. (1985) Yeast Identification Program. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Deak, T. and Beuchat, L.R. (1987) Identification of foodborne yeasts. J. Food Protect. 50, 243-2641 Haridi, M.S.A. (1987) Taxonomie milchwirtschafthch wichtiger Hefen. Dissertation, Technische Uni-

versit~it Miinchen, Miinchen. Kammerlehner, J. (1986) Labk~ise-Technologie. Molkereitechnik, Band 74/75. Th. Mann, Gelsenkirchen-

Buer. Krapf, J. (1987) Der Einfluss der Prozessparameter bei der Camembertherstellung auf die Entwicklung

yon Reifungsflora und Mucor. Dissertation. Technische Universitiit Miinchen, Miinchen. Kreger-van Rij, N.J.W. (1984) The Yeasts, a Taxometric Study. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Lacto-Labo (1986) Die Aromatisierungs- und Reifungsfermente. Die Hefen. Lacto-Labo, Dang6 Saint

Romain. Lenoir, J. (1984) The surface flora and its role in the ripening of cheese. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 171, 3-20. Philliskirk, G. and Young, T.W. (1975) The occurrence of killer character in yeasts of various genera.

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 41, 147-151. Sauter, H. (1986) Die Oberfl~ichenflora von WeinkEse - Reifungsfehler und ihre Ursachen. Dissertation,

Technische Universit~it, Miinchen, Miinchen. Seiler, H. (1983) Identification key for coryneform bacteria derived by numerical taxometric studies. J.

Gen. Microbiol. 129, 1422-1471. Seller, H. and Busse, M. (1988) Identifizierung von Helen mit Mikrotiterplatten. Forum Mikrobiologie

11, 505-509. Siewert, R. (1986) Kasereitechnisch wichtige Hefen. Arbeiten des VEB Wissenschaftlich-technisch-

Okonomisches Zentrum der Milchindustrie Oranienburg, Nr. 52.


Recommended