Date post: | 26-Feb-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
TRADE ROUTE INTELLIGENCE & THE GLOBAL LINER SHIPPING OUTLOOK
1
Alan Murphy COO and Partner SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
April 8th, 2014 TOC Asia
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
SeaIntel
Container Shippping Analysts
- Founded January 1st, 2011
- Wholly owned by Lars Jensen (CEO) and Alan Murphy (COO)
- 12 Analysts & Consultants in Copenhagen, Hong Kong and Brussels.
- Management Team with combined 40 years of experience in Container Shipping
Our Focus:
- Integrity
- Methodology
- Assumptions
- Data Quality
Major Milestones:
- 500+ Research & Analysis articles published since March 2011
- 1,000+ citations in Industry Press (Lloyd’s List, JoC, etc.)
- Official Knowledge Partner of the Global Institute of Logistics
- Data Partnership with INTTRA
- World’s most comprehensive database on Carrier Reliability
- Curriculum provider for the World Maritime University
2
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Agenda
• Current Market Situation
• The Impact of P3 and Reaction From Other Carriers
• Will the Ordering of Mega-Vessels Continue in 2014?
• Who is the World’s largest container carrier?
3
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Asian Demand
Source: Container Trade Statistics
- For the last five months
of 2013 we saw a year-
on-year increase in Asian
exports and imports to
Europe.
- Last year we saw a
decrease in transported
TEU of 200,000 TEU in
Asian exports.
- At the same time Asian
imports increased with
300,000 TEU.
5
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Current Orderbook is Heavily Skewed to Large Vessels
Orderbook data based on Alphaliner
• 85% of the orderbook will be
delivered before December 31,
2015
• Annual average capacity growth
2014 estimated at 5.5% and
2015 estimated at 8.5%
• Global demand is expected to
grow 4-6% p.a. (SeaIntel
estimate)
Maintaining the current – over tonnaged (!) - market situation would
require the scrapping of 25% of all vessels below 3.000 TEU.
6
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Capacity on Asia-Europe – 2012 vs. 2013 vs. 2014
Source: SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
- Number of services have decreased from 39 in March 2013 to 37 services in March 2014.
- However, capacity deployed on Asia-Europe YTD is the same as in 2013 even though the
number of service has been reduced with two.
- 2013 Y/Y capacity decrease of 1.5%
- At the same time the average vessel size has increased by more than 7%.
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Capacity on Transpacific – 2012 vs. 2013 vs. 2014
Source: SeaIntel Maritime Analysis Source: SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
- YTD capacity has increased 7% compared
with 2013.
- 2013 Y/Y Capacity increase of 10.8%
- Number of services have increased from 17
to 19 since March last year, while the average
vessel size has increased by more than 13%.
- YTD capacity has decreased by 1%
compared with 2013.
- 2013 Y/Y Capacity increase of 6.2%
- Number of services have been reduced from
44 to 41, while the average vessel size have
increased by 8% YTD compared with 2013.
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Capacity on Asia-ECSA – 2012 vs. 2013 vs. 2014
Source: SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
- One service suspended in October 2013, so the total number of services is redúced to six.
- However, larger vessels have been cascaded into the trade and therefore the average weekly
capacity has increased 41%.
- 2013 Capacity increase of 9.5%
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Capacity Management Results in Excessive Cascading to Other Trades
Rate data based on SCFI from Shanghai Shipping Exchange Capacity data from SeaIntel’s weekly capacity outlook report
Carriers have reshaped their Asia-East Coast South America networks in Q2 2013. The key changes have been the phase-in of significantly larger vessels not needed on Asia-Europe and Transpacific trades. The result has been an average capacity growth of 30% Y-o-Y in Q3 2013. Recent blanking of sailings has reduced capacity increase in Q4 to 20% Y-o-Y
10
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Widening gap between global supply and demand
• The gap has been growing
• Partial remedy be the carriers: slow-steaming
• No more saving grace from increasing sailing distances
• 2015 supply increase can be lower is we see further scrapping and slippage
• Impact first on Asia-Europe, then cascading to other trades
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Cycle time drastically reduced
Due to structural overcapacity, cycle times are shrinking. For container vessels this is down to 6 months cycle time on some trades now.
Extra-loaders
Blank sailings
Mar
ket
stre
ngt
h
Vessel lay-ups
Vessel re-activation
Re-activate vessels, start new services
Extra-loaders
Cancel services
12
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
The Asia-Europe Market Volatility is Worsening
Cycle time is rapidly shortening Rate declines following successful rate increases getting increasingly steep
Rate data based on SCFI from Shanghai Shipping Exchange
13
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Week-on-Week Changes in Asia-Europe
Rate data based on SCFI from Shanghai Shipping Exchange
15
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
The Asia-Europe rate erosion worsens
The increasing price erosion is driven by a combination of structural overcapacity and the
carriers being ”trapped” in a game of prisoners dilemma.
For the carriers, increases are only feasible when they all stand firm at the same time
This results in an acute need for the carriers to manage capacity
-21 USD/week -39 USD/week
-65 USD/week -76 USD/week
-84 USD/week
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Bunker Prices have increased exponentially
But Bunker per slot has remained stable, due to:
- Super Slow Steaming
- Increased vessel sizes
17
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Blank sailings = product volatility
The product volatility is increasing, and is not purely related to traditional seasons such as
Chinese New Year
This is currently the carriers’ only tool to manage capacity – and hence attempt to increase
freight rate lavels
We should expect product volatility to remain high due to the structural overcapacity
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
The Impact of P3 and Reaction From Other Carriers
20
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
P3 Alliance – the Logical Step in a Commoditized Market
• Network scale advantages – especially the flexibility
stemming from a large network
• Utilizing the mega-vessels efficiently
• Shifting the pressure onto the other carriers
• P3 addresses low cost from several angles: • A ”conveyour belt” for the backbone east-west trade with large
vessels.
• The possibility to adjust weekly capacity through blank sailings in a more incremental manner.
• The possibility to have ”daily” services.
21
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
What will non-P3 carriers do?
• The G6 and CKYH alliances will face significant cost pressure in 2015 with their current fleet composition (including orderbooks)
• Independent carriers must have alliance relationships
• Potential for an alliance shake-up
• G6 Alliance has already announced expansion to full-fledged coverage on all east-west trunk routes
22
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Vessel Size Advantage
Data from SeaIntel’s internal analysis
• It will be beneficial for CKYHE
to include CSCL or/and UASC
in terms of economy of scale
and cost reduction.
• G6’s average vessel size to
North Europe will not
increase significantly in 2014
nor H12015.
• P3 will have a significantly
scale-advantage in Asia-
North Europe.
23
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Product Advantage
• The product offered will
actually improve slightly
compared to what the
individual P3 carriers offer
today on Asia-N. Europe.
• P3 will be able to offer a
more diverse product to their
customers compared with G6
and CKYH.
• Asia-Europe services:
– P3: 14 (8/6)
– CKYHE: 9 (6/3)
– G6: 6 (5/1)
24
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
P3 – the ”game for the other carriers
G6 CKYH Data based on Alphaliner
From a fleet growth perspective, the non-P3 carriers have very dissimilar interests
25
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Will the Ordering of Mega-Vessels Continue in 2014?
26
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
+10,000 Vessels on Order by Alliances
Source: SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
- The P3 carriers have the
largest orderbook of
+10,000 TEU vessels and
have a critical scale-
advantage
- Evergreen, CSCL and UASC
would be attractive partners
for all the major east-west
alliances.
27
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Increasing Demand for Feedering?
- The average vessel size of
Top-200 vessels have
increased with 10,000 TEU
over the past 20 years.
- The increasing vessel size
on Asia-Europe can lead to
increasing demand for
feedering in Intra-Asia, due
to port infrastruture
limitations for +10,000
TEU vessels in Asia.
28
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Larger Vessels are Cascaded to Intra-Trades
Asia-Europe
Transpacific
Intra-Asia
Asia-ECSA
- The traditionally vessels
size in Intra-Trades are
<3000 TEU.
- The cascading effect has
led to that 5,000–6,000
TEU vessels are deployed
in Intra-Asia.
- Intra-Asia is a limited
market for post-panamax
vessels as they are not
geared.
29
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
The likely next steps
The challenges: •Cost competitiveness
•Network depth and breadth
•Different level of growth / aggresiveness inside alliances The options: •Prevent the P3 from getting regulatory approval
•Order more large vessels
•Increase the number of ad-hoc Vessel Sharing Agreements
•Take more members into the existing alliances
•Completely reshape existing alliances
A risk, but not likely
Very likely
Very likely
Very likely
Possible
30
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Who is the World’s largest conatiner carrier?
32
- The A.P. Moller-Maersk group still controls more capacity than any other entity - This may change as new-buildings get delivered (Alphaliner) - A.P. Moller-Maersk group capacity is 2.6 million TEU, MSC is 2.4 million TEU - Using published figures for APMM niche brands and a low estimate for Seago line, puts Maersk Line vessels at less than 400 and capacity at less than 2.35 million
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Who is the World’s largest conatiner carrier?
33
- The A.P. Moller-Maersk group carried close to 18 million TEU in 2013 - MSC carried close to 14 million TEU in 2013 - According to their own website, MCC carried 1.5 million FFE in 2012 - According to Safmarine online media center, Safmarine carried 1 million FFE in 2011 - Assuming volumes have not decreased in 2013, this puts Maersk Line below MSC - Maersk Line still has larger average vessels…
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Conclusions
• Continued structural overcapacity
• Continued pressure on freight rates
• Focus on cost and lower bunker consumption.
• Service consistency and on-time peformance is out the window
• Size matters and we will see continued vessel ordering
34
TOC Asia – April 2014 © SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
Thank you!
SeaIntel Sunday Spotlight: Annual subscription (52 issues) - €1600
Global Liner Performance: Annual subscription (12 issues) - €1800
Tradelane Capacity Outlook: Annual subscription (52 issues) - €2000
If you wish to subscribe, please contact:
Mr. Morten Berg Thomsen: [email protected]
Mr. Kasper Hansen: [email protected]
35