+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Variable electric fields for high throughput electroporation protocol design in curvilinear...

Variable electric fields for high throughput electroporation protocol design in curvilinear...

Date post: 28-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: independent
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
COMMUNICATION TO THE EDITOR Variable Electric Fields for High Throughput Electroporation Protocol Design in Curvilinear Coordinates Francois Fernand, Liel Rubinsky, Alex Golberg, Boris Rubinsky Department of Mechanical Engineering, Etcheverry Hall, 6124, University of California at Berkeley, 2521 Hearst Ave, Berkeley, California 94720; telephone Q2 : XXX; fax: XXX; e-mail: [email protected] Received 14 October 2011; revision received 5 January 2012; accepted 9 February 2012 Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/bit.24479 ABSTRACT: The mathematical solution to the electric field equation in cylindrical coordinates, has suggested to us a new experimental methodology and device for reducing experimental effort in designing electroporation protocols. Using a new cylindrical electroporation system, we show, with an Escherichia coli cell model, how key electroporation parameters emerge precisely from single experiments rather than through interpolation from numerous experiments in the conventional Cartesian electroporation system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012;9999: 1–6. ß 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. KEYWORDS: high throughput; electroporation; protocol design The permeabilization of the cell membrane using electric fields applied across the membrane is known as electropo- ration (Neumann et al., 1982) or electropermeabilization (Stopper et al., 1985). Electroporation is reversible when cells survive the electropermeabilization and irreversible when they do not. Reversible electroporation is commonly used in biotechnology and medicine for such applications as gene or drug delivery into cells (Dev et al., 2000). Irreversible electroporation is important for non-thermal sterilization in the food industry, biotechnology and medicine, and for tissue ablation in medicine (Pakhomov et al., 2010; Rubinsky, 2010). The outcome of an electroporation protocol, whether reversible or irreversible, depends on the parameters of the electric field such as strength, pulse length, number of pulses, time interval between pulses, frequency; on solution composition, pH, temperature and on cell type, shape and size. Because electroporation depends on so many param- eters, designing optimal electroporation protocols requires tedious and lengthy efforts. To illustrate the complexity of protocol design, Figure 1 shows a theoretical curve adapted from (Dev et al., 2000), which correlates electric field strength, single pulse length and the biophysical phenome- non that occurs when the particular parameters are applied across a cell. One of the most important features of the figure is the line that separates between the reversible and irreversible electroporation domains, which is critical in designing optimal electroporation protocols. In optimal reversible electroporation it is desirable to be close to and below that line while in optimal irreversible electroporation it is desirable to be close to and above that line. Conventional methods for the systematic development of optimal electroporation protocols employ experimental systems made of two parallel electrodes, bounding the media of interest, in a one-dimensional Cartesian configuration (e.g., Sale and Hamilton, 1967; Hamilton and Sale, 1967). The solution to the simple Laplace equation (r 2 ¼ 0; where w is the potential) for a homogeneous Cartesian system, subject to constant voltage boundary conditions on the electrodes, V 2 and V 1 , gives an expression for the electric field between the planar electrodes. It is, ðV 2 V 1 Þ=L where L is the distance between the electrodes. It is evident that the Cartesian configuration produces a constant electric field in the treated medium between the electrodes. Identifying the electric field parameters that separate between reversible and irreversible electroporation requires numerous constant electric field experiments, in which the electric field strength is continuously changed in separate experiments until the interface is detected approximately, through interpolation between experiments (Rubinsky et al., 2008). Several approaches were introduced for multiparameter optimization of in vitro and in vivo electroporation. Heiser (1999) published an extensive review on electroporation parameters for various cell lines and general guidelines for electroporation protocol optimizations in vitro (Heiser, 1999). A review and guidelines for optimization of in vivo electroporation applications was reported by Gehl (2003). Correspondence to: A. Golberg ß 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 9999, No. 9999, 2012 1 BIT-11-943.R1(24479)
Transcript

COMMUNICATION TO THE EDITOR

Variable Electric Fields for High ThroughputElectroporation Protocol Design inCurvilinear Coordinates

Francois Fernand, Liel Rubinsky, Alex Golberg, Boris Rubinsky

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Etcheverry Hall, 6124, University of California at

Berkeley, 2521 Hearst Ave, Berkeley, California 94720; telephoneQ2: XXX; fax: XXX;

e-mail: [email protected]

Received 14 October 2011; revision received 5 January 2012; accepted 9 February 2012

Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/bit.2447

9

ABSTRACT: The mathematical solution to the electric fieldequation in cylindrical coordinates, has suggested to us anew experimental methodology and device for reducingexperimental effort in designing electroporation protocols.Using a new cylindrical electroporation system, we show,with an Escherichia coli cell model, how key electroporationparameters emerge precisely from single experiments ratherthan through interpolation from numerous experiments inthe conventional Cartesian electroporation system.

Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012;9999: 1–6.

� 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

KEYWORDS: high throughput; electroporation; protocoldesign

The permeabilization of the cell membrane using electricfields applied across the membrane is known as electropo-ration (Neumann et al., 1982) or electropermeabilization(Stopper et al., 1985). Electroporation is reversible whencells survive the electropermeabilization and irreversiblewhen they do not. Reversible electroporation is commonlyused in biotechnology and medicine for such applications asgene or drug delivery into cells (Dev et al., 2000). Irreversibleelectroporation is important for non-thermal sterilization inthe food industry, biotechnology and medicine, and fortissue ablation in medicine (Pakhomov et al., 2010;Rubinsky, 2010).

The outcome of an electroporation protocol, whetherreversible or irreversible, depends on the parameters of theelectric field such as strength, pulse length, number ofpulses, time interval between pulses, frequency; on solutioncomposition, pH, temperature and on cell type, shape andsize. Because electroporation depends on so many param-eters, designing optimal electroporation protocols requirestedious and lengthy efforts. To illustrate the complexity of

Correspondence to: A. Golberg

� 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

BIT-11-9

protocol design, Figure 1 shows a theoretical curve adaptedfrom (Dev et al., 2000), which correlates electric fieldstrength, single pulse length and the biophysical phenome-non that occurs when the particular parameters are appliedacross a cell. One of themost important features of the figureis the line that separates between the reversible andirreversible electroporation domains, which is critical indesigning optimal electroporation protocols. In optimalreversible electroporation it is desirable to be close to andbelow that line while in optimal irreversible electroporationit is desirable to be close to and above that line.Conventional methods for the systematic development ofoptimal electroporation protocols employ experimentalsystemsmade of two parallel electrodes, bounding the mediaof interest, in a one-dimensional Cartesian configuration(e.g., Sale and Hamilton, 1967; Hamilton and Sale, 1967).The solution to the simple Laplace equation (r2’ ¼ 0;where w is the potential) for a homogeneous Cartesiansystem, subject to constant voltage boundary conditions onthe electrodes, V2 and V1, gives an expression for the electricfield between the planar electrodes. It is, ðV2 � V1Þ=L whereL is the distance between the electrodes. It is evident that theCartesian configuration produces a constant electric field inthe treated medium between the electrodes. Identifying theelectric field parameters that separate between reversible andirreversible electroporation requires numerous constantelectric field experiments, in which the electric field strengthis continuously changed in separate experiments until theinterface is detected approximately, through interpolationbetween experiments (Rubinsky et al., 2008).

Several approaches were introduced for multiparameteroptimization of in vitro and in vivo electroporation. Heiser(1999) published an extensive review on electroporationparameters for various cell lines and general guidelines forelectroporation protocol optimizations in vitro (Heiser,1999). A review and guidelines for optimization of in vivoelectroporation applications was reported by Gehl (2003).

Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 9999, No. 9999, 2012 1

43.R1(24479)

Figure 1. Theoretical mapping of biophysical effects experienced by cells as a

function of electroporation parameters.

Figure 2. Electroporation parameters analysis: (a) image of a plate electro-

porated in one-dimensional cylindrical coordinates, after incubation. The central part

has no cell colonies, (b) a schematic view of the analyzed cylindrical system. Two

cylindrical electrodes with radiuses R1 and R2 were used. The radius (r) of irreversible

electroporated zone was measured. c: Calculated electric field-radius (r) correlation

for the experiment, (d) electric parameters that identify the conditions in which

irreversible electroporation occurs during electroporation of E. coli in pH buffered

medium (error bar 1 standard deviation).

Furthermore, several statistical methodologies were pro-posed to reduce the number of experiments required forprotocol optimizations. Multifactorial experimental designfor optimizing transformation protocols was introduced by(Marciset and Mollet, 1994). Keng-Shiang et al. (2007) usedthe Taguchi Method for the optimization of gene electro-transfer (Keng-Shiang et al., 2007). Recently, a centralcomposite design was used to optimize electroporationprotocols (Madeira et al., 2010).

In this study we developed a different approach tomultiparameter optimization, based on the use in a singleexperiment of a well-defined variable electric field topologyin the curvilinear coordinate system. The concept will beillustrated with a simple to implement cylindrical coordinatesystem. The electric field calculated from the solution to theone-dimensional Laplace equation in cylindrical coordi-nates, in a medium between two cylinders of radiuses R1 andR2 on which electric potentials of V1 and V2 are imposed,respectively, is given by,

V1 � V2

r � ln R2

R1

� �

where r is the variable radius inside the domain of interest.Obviously, the electric field varies continuously as an inversefunction of the radius. (In one-dimensional sphericalcoordinates the electric field varies as one over the radiussquared.) Therefore, in a single experiment in one-dimensional cylindrical or spherical electrode systems, thecells between the electrodes will experience a continuouslyvariable electric field, that is, nevertheless, well defined as afunction of the radius. The response of the cells to anyelectroporation protocol can be evaluated as a function oftheir relative location (defined by radius) and therebycorrelated to the electric field. Therefore, when an

2 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 9999, No. 9999, 2012

experiment is performed with cylindrical (or spherical)electrodes, the results of a single experiment producecontinuous information on the effect of a wide range ofelectric fields, which are quantified by the radius at whichthey are produced. In contrast, to produce similarinformation, the conventional Cartesian electrode systemrequires a very large number of experiments and theinterpolation of results between the studied discrete datapoints.

Figure 2 illustrates results obtained from a studyperformed with a one-dimensional cylindrical system, usingEscherichia coli BL21 (D13) PSJS1244, an ampicillin stablestrain. The Figure 2d shows the electric field at the reversible/irreversible interface as a function of the number of pulses.The microorganisms were spread on a Petri dish and aconstant pulsed electric potential was imposed on twoconcentric metal cylinders, in contact with the surface onwhich the microorganism was plated. In the one-dimen-sional cylindrical electrode system used, the outer diameterof the inner cylinder was 1.18mm and the inner diameter ofthe outer cylinder was 22.15mm. The electric pulse wasdelivered by a BTX (BTX ECM 830, Harvard Apparatus,MAQ3). Four sites were treated in each Petri dish, after whichthe samples were incubated for 18 h at 378C and examined.Figure 2a and d reports on results with a pH buffered plate,at which pH did not change after the application of electricfield, and in which 2,200 V pulses were applied between theconcentric electrodes in 40ms pulse duration at 1Hzfrequency. Five repeats were performed for each condition.

It should be emphasized that each data point on the curveswas obtained from a single experiment (with five repeats). Incontrast, obtaining such a single data point with Cartesianelectrodes would require numerous single electric fieldexperiments and interpolation.

Figure 2b and c shows how the plot in Figure 2d wasobtained. Figure 2a shows the appearance of a treatedcylinder after incubation. It is evident that the cells in thecentral area did not survive the electric fields to which theywere exposed and did not form colonies. To determine theradius of cell death we measured the innermost radius of thecolonies that survived electroporation, as described in theMaterials and Methods Section. Figure 2b shows the modelof the analyzed system. Two cylindrical electrodes, withradiuses of R1 and R2, and a measured radius (r) of a zonewhere irreversible electroporation takes place, are shown onFigure 2b. Then, the mathematical expression for the electricfield as a function of radius in cylindrical coordinates wasused to produce Figure 2c. Figure 2c is used to correlate theradius of cell death in Figure 2a with the electric field at thatradius. The electric field at the radius of cell death is thanplotted as a function of number of pulses in Figure 2d. Thisplots the electric parameters at which irreversible electro-poration begins.

In summary, we propose that the use of cylindrical one-dimensional electrodes will substantially reduce the numberof experiments needed to design optimal electroporationprotocols, over those obtained with the use of traditionalCartesian electrodes. In this report we have shown the use ofthe concept for obtaining the reversible/irreversible inter-face. Obviously a similar experiment with fluorescence diesor genes can be used to determine the parameters at theinterface between reversible and no effect electric fields.Furthermore, this method provides a means to examine in asingle experiment, various colonies that have undergoneelectroporation with a wide range of well-defined electro-poration parameters. The relative location of each colony ofinterest identifies the electroporation conditions it hasexperienced. It should be noted that the idea of a well-defined topological space of variable electric fields could beextended through further research in topology to the designof systems of more complex surfaces than the cylinder orsphere, which may produce in a single experiment complexranges of parameters of interest.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Device

The cylindrical one-dimensional electroporation electrodeswere manufactured using a Perspex ‘‘square’’ (3 cm by 3 cm)basis. A half cm notch carved in the side of the square wasattached to the top of a brass ring using a heated glue gun.The brass ring had an inside diameter of 22.15mm, anoutside diameter of 25.40mm, and a height of 4mm. The tipof an 18 gauge steel needle (Precision Glide needle, Becton

Dickinson & Co, NJQ4) was cut 1 cm from the top, to formthe inner, 0.6mm radius cylinder. The needle was theninserted through the center of the plastic square in themiddle of the brass ring forming two concentric cylinders.

Electroporation Procedure

The study was performed using E. coli BL21 (D13) PSJS1244an ampicillin stable strain. A single E. coli colony was used toinoculate 50mL of sterile LB Broth (Ditco, NYQ5)containing 100mg/mL of ampicillin (American SystemQ6).The sample was placed in a Thermo Scientific MaxQ 4450shaker-incubator. The temperature was maintained at 378C.The shaker speed was 200 rpm to allow aeration for optimalgrowth. The sample was kept in the shaker-incubator for14 h to reach stationary phase. The final concentration ofapproximately 106 CFU/mL was determined by viable countmethod. After 14 h in the shaker-incubator a 100mL samplewas removed and diluted in 10mL of sterile water (100�dilution) 100mL of the diluted sample was plated on to eachpre-prepared agar plate and spread using glass beads(Novagen, CAQ7). The glass beads were removed and theelectroporation device was inserted into the agar in onequadrant of the Petri dish. The device was pushed into theagar plate until the ring and needle touched the Petri dishbottom in order to ensure they were at the same depth.Alligator clips were attached to the brass ring and the 18Gneedle. The alligator clips were never in direct contact withthe agar to ensure no direct discharge into the gel. Thisallowed the field to be equally distributed around the needle.The clips were hooked up to the BTX (BTX-model 610, BTXECM 830 square-wave electroporator, Harvard Apparatus).The electroporation parameters used were 2,200 V, 40mspulse duration, 1Hz frequency. The numbers of pulses werechanged between experiments. Statistical analysis was donewith the final parameters recorded from the BTX device.

Following the electroporation the needle and the ringwere removed from the agar gel. (A similar experiment wasthan performed in another quadrant. A total of fourexperiments were performed per dish.) A total of fiveexperiments per parameter were performed. After theexperiment the Petri dish was incubated at 378C for 18 h.Following the incubation period the dishes were removedand IRE curve radius was measured.

Plate Preparation

Agar Petri plates were prepared to maintain pH 7 after theapplication of electric pulses. The mixture was composed of0.1 g/L NaCl (Spectrum Chemical, Mfg Corp, CAQ8), 10 g/LBactotryptone, 5 g/L Yeast Extract, 15 g/L Bacto Agar(Becton Dickinson & Co, NJQ9), 0.5 g/L glucose wasdissolved in distilled water and heated at 1218C in anautoclave for 15min. After cooling down and reaching 508C,23.83 g/L HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, CQ10A) and ampicillin(American BioanalyticalQ11) at 10mg/mL was added to

Fernand et al.: VariableQ1 Electric Fields 3

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

100mg/mL final concentration. The buffered agar was thenpoured into a 100mm Petri dish and the drying timebetween the pouring and the closing of the plates was6.5min. In fact, the evaporation of water during storagemust be taken into account because it changes the NaClconcentration and of course the conductivity of themedium.

Radius Measurement and Statistical Analysis

Electroporated plates were removed from the incubator after18 h. Digital images of the plates and scale reference weretaken and then used to determine the death zone diameter.The error on the electric field estimate includes the diametermeasurement errors (precision of 0.05mm) and the BTXdevice output error (20 V). The reported radius is an averageof five repeats with a standard deviation calculated from thefive measurements.

References

Dev S, Rabussay D, Widera D, Hofmann G. 2000. Medical applications of

electroporation. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 28(1):206–223.

Gehl J. 2003. Electroporation: Theory and methods, perspectives for drug

delivery, gene therapy and research. Acta Physiol Scand 177(4):

437–447.

4 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 9999, No. 9999, 2012

Hamilton WA, Sale AJH. 1967. Effect of high electric field on micro-

organisms. II. Mechanism of action of the lethal effect. Biochim

Biophys Acta 148:788–800.

Heiser WC. 1999. Optimizing electroporation conditions for the transfor-

mation of mammalian cells. In: Tymms MJ, editor. Transcription

factor protocols. Totowa, New Jersey: Springer. p 117–134.

Keng-Shiang H, Sheng-Chung Y, Hung-Yi C, Yu-Cheng L. 2007. Optimi-

zation of Gene Transfection Condition using Taguchi Method for an

Electroporation Microchip; June 10–14, 2007. p 847–850.

Madeira C, Ribeiro S, TurkM, Cabral J. 2010. Optimization of gene delivery

to HEK293T cells by microporation using a central composite design

methodology. Biotechnol Lett 32(10):1393–1399.

Marciset O, Mollet B. 1994. Multifactorial experimental design for

optimizing transformation: Electroporation of Streptococcus thermo-

philus. Biotechnol Bioeng 43(6):490–496.

Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH. 1982. Gene

transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric

fields. EMBO J 1(7):841–845.

Pakhomov AG, Miklavcic D, Markov MM. 2010. Advanced electroporation

techniques in biology and medicine. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 521 p.

Rubinsky B, editor. ‘‘Irreversible Electroporation’’ Springer. Series in

Biomedical Engineering 2010, XIV, 314 p. Hardcover Chennai ISBN:

978-3-642-05419-8.

Rubinsky J, Onik G,Mikus P, Rubinsky B. 2008. Optimal parameters for the

destruction of prostate cancer using irreversible electroporation. J Urol

180(6):2668–2674.

Sale AJH, Hamilton WA. 1967. Effect of high electric field on micro-

organisms. I. Killing of bacteria and yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta

148:781–788.

Stopper H, Zimmermann U, Wecker E. 1985. High yields of DNA-transfer

into mouse L-cells by electropermeabilization. Z Naturforsch

40(11–12):929–932.

XXXQ12 F. Fernand, L. Rubinsky, A. Golberg*,B. Rubinsky. . . . . . . . . . . . xx–xx

Variable Electric Fields for HighThroughput Electroporation ProtocolDesign in Curvilinear Coordinates

Q1: Author: A running head short title was not supplied; please check if this one is suitable and, if not, please supply a short title of up to 45

characters that can be used instead.

Q2: Author: Please provide the corresponding author’s telephone and fax number.

Q3: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s state name.

Q4: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city name.

Q5: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city name.

Q6: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city and state names.

Q7: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city name.

Q8: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city name.

Q9: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city name.

Q10: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city name.

Q11: Author: Please provide the manufacturer’s city name.

Q12: Author: New for 2012: Biotechnology and Bioengineering is initiating publication of a graphical Table of Contents. Please supply an

image and text for this purpose that adheres to the following guidelines: Image: A colorful (if possible), mostly square image from

your article. Please ensure images are of high enough quality for online publication. Text: Descriptive text (2-3 sentences; 80 word

maximum) which should capture the most compelling aspects of your work, aimed at a broad readership. Submit the requested image

and text with your page proofs. The Editorial Office will select the image and text if they are not supplied.

USING E-ANNOTATION TOOLS FOR ELECTRONIC PROOF CORRECTION

Required Software

Adobe Acrobat Professional or Acrobat Reader (version 7.0 or above) is required to e-annotate PDFs. Acrobat 8 Reader is a free download: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.

For help with system requirements, go to: http://www.adobe.com/support/.

Once you have Acrobat Reader on your PC and open the proof, you will see the Commenting Toolbar (if it does not appear automatically go to Tools>Commenting>Commenting Toolbar). If these options are not available in your Adobe Reader menus then it is possible that your Adobe version is lower than 7 or the PDF has not been prepared properly.

PDF Annotations (Adobe Reader version 7 or 8) – Commenting Toolbars look like this:

(PC, Adobe version 7)

(PC, Adobe version 8, right click on title bar (Comment & Markup) to show additional icons)

(Mac)

PDF Annotations (Adobe Reader version 9)

If you experience problems annotating files in Adobe Acrobat Reader 9 then you may need to change a preference setting in order to edit.

The default for the Commenting toolbar is set to ‘off’ in version 9. To change this setting select ‘Edit | Preferences’, then ‘Documents’ (at left under ‘Categories’), then select the option ‘Never’ for ‘PDF/A View Mode’. (the Commenting toolbar is the same as in version 8).

PLEASE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO EDIT THE ARTICLE TEXT ITSELF

TO INDICATE INSERT, REPLACE, OR REMOVE TEXT

Insert text

Click the ‘Text Edits’ button on the Commenting toolbar. Click to set the cursor location in the text and simply start typing. The text will appear in a commenting box. You may also cut-and-paste text from another file into the commenting box. Close the box by clicking on ‘x’ in the top right-hand corner. It can be deleted by right clicking (for the PC, ctrl-click on the Mac) on it and selecting ‘Delete’.

Replace text

Click the ‘Text Edits’ button on the Commenting toolbar. To highlight the text to be replaced, click and drag the cursor over the text. Then simply type in the replacement text. The replacement text will appear in a commenting box. You may also cut-and-paste text from another file into this box. To replace formatted text (an equation for example) please Attach a file (see below).

Remove text

Click the ‘Text Edits’ button on the Commenting toolbar. Click and drag over the text to be deleted. Then press the delete button on your keyboard. The text to be deleted will then be struck through.

HIGHLIGHT TEXT/MAKE A COMMENT

Click on the ‘Highlight’ button on the commenting toolbar. Click and drag over the text. To make a comment, double click on the highlighted text and simply start typing.

ATTACH A FILE

Click on the ‘Attach a file’ button on the commenting toolbar. Click on the figure, table or formatted text to be replaced. A window will automatically open allowing you to attach a file. To make a comment, go to ‘General’ and then ‘Description’ in the ‘Properties’ window. A graphic will appear indicating the insertion of a file.

LEAVE A NOTE/COMMENT

Click on the ‘Note Tool’ button on the commenting toolbar. Click to set the location of the note on the document and simply start typing. Do not use this feature to make text edits.

REVIEW

To review your changes, click on the ‘Show’ button on the commenting toolbar. Choose ‘Show Comments List’. Navigate by clicking on a correction in the list. Alternatively, double click on any mark-up to open the commenting box.

UNDO/DELETE CHANGE

To undo any changes made, use the right click button on your mouse (for PCs, Ctrl-Click for Mac). Alternatively click on the ‘Edit’ in the main Adobe menu and then ‘Undo’. You can also delete edits using the right click (Ctrl-Click on the Mac) and selecting ‘Delete’.

SEND YOUR ANNOTATED PDF FILE BACK TO WILEY VIA [email protected]

Save the annotations to your file and return as an e-mail. Before returning, please ensure you have answered any questions raised on the Query form that you have inserted all the corrections: later inclusion of any subsequent corrections cannot be guaranteed.

Note: Comprehensive instructions are provided within your PDF file: to access these instructions please click on the Comments and Markup menu in the main tool bar, or click on Help.

Color figures were included with the final manuscript files that we received for your article. Because of the high cost of color printing, we can only print figures in color if authors cover the expense. Please indicate if you would like your figures to be printed in color or black and white. Color images will be reproduced online in Wiley Online Library at no charge, whether or not you opt for color printing.

Failure to return this form will result in the publication of your figures in black and white. JOURNAL

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING

VOLUME

ISSUE

TITLE OF MANUSCRIPT

MS. NO.

NO. OF COLOR PAGES

AUTHOR(S)

No. Color Pages Color Charges No. Color Pages Color Charges No. Color Pages Color Charges 1 500 5 2500 9 4500 2 1000 6 3000 10 5000 3 1500 7 3500 11 5500 4 2000 8 4000 12 6000

***Please contact [email protected] for a quote if you have more than 12 pages of color***

Please print my figures in black and white

Please print my figures in color BILL TO: Purchase Name Order No. Institution Phone Address Fax E-mail

A. COPYRIGHT

1. The Contributor assigns to Wiley-Blackwell, during the full term of copy-right and any extensions or renewals, all copyright in and to the Contribution,and all rights therein, including but not limited to the right to publish, repub-lish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the Contribution in whole or inpart in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative worksthroughout the world, in all languages and in all media of expression nowknown or later developed, and to license or permit others to do so.

2. Reproduction, posting, transmission or other distribution or use of the finalContribution in whole or in part in any medium by the Contributor as permit-ted by this Agreement requires a citation to the Journal and an appropriatecredit to Wiley-Blackwell as Publisher, and/or the Society if applicable, suitablein form and content as follows: (Title of Article, Author, Journal Title and Volume/Issue, Copyright © [year], copyright owner as specified in the Journal).Links to the final article on Wiley-Blackwell’s website are encouraged whereappropriate.

B. RETAINED RIGHTS

Notwithstanding the above, the Contributor or, if applicable, the Contributor’sEmployer, retains all proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patentrights, in any process, procedure or article of manufacture described in theContribution.

C. PERMITTED USES BY CONTRIBUTOR

1. Submitted Version. Wiley-Blackwell licenses back the following rights tothe Contributor in the version of the Contribution as originally submitted forpublication:

a. After publication of the final article, the right to self-archive on the Con-tributor’s personal website or in the Contributor’s institution’s/employer’sinstitutional repository or archive. This right extends to both intranets andthe Internet. The Contributor may not update the submission version orreplace it with the published Contribution. The version posted must containa legend as follows: This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the followingarticle: FULL CITE, which has been published in final form at [Link to finalarticle].

b. The right to transmit, print and share copies with colleagues.

2. Accepted Version. Re-use of the accepted and peer-reviewed (but notfinal) version of the Contribution shall be by separate agreement with Wiley-Blackwell. Wiley-Blackwell has agreements with certain funding agencies governing reuse of this version. The details of those relationships, and otherofferings allowing open web use, are set forth at the following website:http://www.wiley.com/go/funderstatement. NIH grantees should check thebox at the bottom of this document.

3. Final Published Version. Wiley-Blackwell hereby licenses back to the Contributor the following rights with respect to the final published version ofthe Contribution:

a. Copies for colleagues. The personal right of the Contributor only to sendor transmit individual copies of the final published version in any format tocolleagues upon their specific request provided no fee is charged, and further-provided that there is no systematic distribution of the Contribu-tion, e.g. posting on a listserve, website or automated delivery.

b. Re-use in other publications. The right to re-use the final Contribution orparts thereof for any publication authored or edited by the Contributor(excluding journal articles) where such re-used material constitutes lessthan half of the total material in such publication. In such case, any modifi-cations should be accurately noted.

c. Teaching duties. The right to include the Contribution in teaching ortraining duties at the Contributor’s institution/place of employment includ-ing in course packs, e-reserves, presentation at professional conferences,in-house training, or distance learning. The Contribution may not be usedin seminars outside of normal teaching obligations (e.g. commercial semi-nars). Electronic posting of the final published version in connection withteaching/training at the Contributor’s institution/place of employment ispermitted subject to the implementation of reasonable access controlmechanisms, such as user name and password. Posting the final publishedversion on the open Internet is not permitted.

d. Oral presentations. The right to make oral presentations based on theContribution.

4. Article Abstracts, Figures, Tables, Data Sets, Artwork and SelectedText (up to 250 words).

a. Contributors may re-use unmodified abstracts for any non-commercialpurpose. For on-line uses of the abstracts, Wiley-Blackwell encourages butdoes not require linking back to the final published versions.

b. Contributors may re-use figures, tables, data sets, artwork, and selectedtext up to 250 words from their Contributions, provided the following conditions are met:

(i) Full and accurate credit must be given to the Contribution.(ii) Modifications to the figures, tables and data must be noted.

Otherwise, no changes may be made.(iii) The reuse may not be made for direct commercial purposes, or for

financial consideration to the Contributor.(iv) Nothing herein shall permit dual publication in violation of journal

ethical practices.

COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AGREEMENT

Date: Contributor name:

Contributor address:

Manuscript number (Editorial office only):

Re: Manuscript entitled

(the “Contribution”)

for publication in (the “Journal”)

published by (“Wiley-Blackwell”).

Dear Contributor(s):Thank you for submitting your Contribution for publication. In order to expedite the editing and publishing process and enable Wiley-Blackwell to disseminate your Contribution to the fullest extent, we need to have this Copyright Transfer Agreement signed and returned as directed in the Journal’sinstructions for authors as soon as possible. If the Contribution is not accepted for publication, or if the Contribution is subsequently rejected, this Agreement shall be null and void. Publication cannot proceed without a signed copy of this Agreement.

CTA-A

D. CONTRIBUTIONS OWNED BY EMPLOYER

1. If the Contribution was written by the Contributor in the course of the Contributor’s employment (as a “work-made-for-hire” in the course ofemployment), the Contribution is owned by the company/employer whichmust sign this Agreement (in addition to the Contributor’s signature) in thespace provided below. In such case, the company/employer hereby assigns toWiley-Blackwell, during the full term of copyright, all copyright in and to theContribution for the full term of copyright throughout the world as specified inparagraph A above.

2. In addition to the rights specified as retained in paragraph B above and therights granted back to the Contributor pursuant to paragraph C above, Wiley-Blackwell hereby grants back, without charge, to such company/employer, itssubsidiaries and divisions, the right to make copies of and distribute the finalpublished Contribution internally in print format or electronically on the Com-pany’s internal network. Copies so used may not be resold or distributed externally.However the company/employer may include information and text from theContribution as part of an information package included with software orother products offered for sale or license or included in patent applications.Posting of the final published Contribution by the institution on a public accesswebsite may only be done with Wiley-Blackwell’s written permission, and paymentof any applicable fee(s). Also, upon payment of Wiley-Blackwell’s reprint fee,the institution may distribute print copies of the published Contribution externally.

E. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

In the case of a Contribution prepared under U.S. Government contract orgrant, the U.S. Government may reproduce, without charge, all or portions ofthe Contribution and may authorize others to do so, for official U.S. Govern-

ment purposes only, if the U.S. Government contract or grant so requires. (U.S.Government, U.K. Government, and other government employees: see notesat end)

F. COPYRIGHT NOTICE

The Contributor and the company/employer agree that any and all copies ofthe final published version of the Contribution or any part thereof distributedor posted by them in print or electronic format as permitted herein will includethe notice of copyright as stipulated in the Journal and a full citation to theJournal as published by Wiley-Blackwell.

G. CONTRIBUTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS

The Contributor represents that the Contribution is the Contributor’s originalwork, all individuals identified as Contributors actually contributed to the Con-tribution, and all individuals who contributed are included. If the Contributionwas prepared jointly, the Contributor agrees to inform the co-Contributors ofthe terms of this Agreement and to obtain their signature to this Agreement ortheir written permission to sign on their behalf. The Contribution is submittedonly to this Journal and has not been published before. (If excerpts from copy-righted works owned by third parties are included, the Contributor will obtainwritten permission from the copyright owners for all uses as set forth in Wiley-Blackwell’s permissions form or in the Journal’s Instructions for Contributors,and show credit to the sources in the Contribution.) The Contributor also warrants that the Contribution contains no libelous or unlawful statements,does not infringe upon the rights (including without limitation the copyright,patent or trademark rights) or the privacy of others, or contain material orinstructions that might cause harm or injury.

CHECK ONE BOX:

Contributor-owned work

Contributor’s signature Date

Type or print name and title

Co-contributor’s signature Date

Type or print name and title

Company/Institution-owned work

Company or Institution (Employer-for-Hire) Date

Authorized signature of Employer Date

U.S. Government work Note to U.S. Government EmployeesA contribution prepared by a U.S. federal government employee as part of the employee’s official duties, orwhich is an official U.S. Government publication, is called a “U.S. Government work,” and is in the publicdomain in the United States. In such case, the employee may cross out Paragraph A.1 but must sign (in theContributor’s signature line) and return this Agreement. If the Contribution was not prepared as part of theemployee’s duties or is not an official U.S. Government publication, it is not a U.S. Government work.

U.K. Government work Note to U.K. Government Employees(Crown Copyright) The rights in a Contribution prepared by an employee of a U.K. government department, agency or other

Crown body as part of his/her official duties, or which is an official government publication, belong to theCrown. U.K. government authors should submit a signed declaration form together with this Agreement.The form can be obtained via http://www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/crown-copyright/copyright-guidance/publication-of-articles-written-by-ministers-and-civil-servants.htm

Other Government work Note to Non-U.S., Non-U.K. Government EmployeesIf your status as a government employee legally prevents you from signing this Agreement, please contactthe editorial office.

NIH Grantees Note to NIH GranteesPursuant to NIH mandate, Wiley-Blackwell will post the accepted version of Contributions authored by NIHgrant-holders to PubMed Central upon acceptance. This accepted version will be made publicly available 12 months after publication. For further information, see www.wiley.com/go/nihmandate.

ATTACH ADDITIONAL SIGNATURE

PAGES AS NECESSARY

(made-for-hire in thecourse of employment)

CTA-A

          

     

Additional reprint and journal issue purchases  

Should you wish to purchase additional copies of your article,  please click on the link and follow the instructions provided: https://caesar.sheridan.com/reprints/redir.php?pub=10089&acro=BIT 9&acro=JCB Corresponding authors are invited to inform their co‐authors of the reprint options available. 

 Please note that regardless of the form in which they are acquired, reprints should not be resold, nor further disseminated in electronic form, nor deployed in part or in whole in any marketing, promotional or educational contexts without authorization from Wiley. Permissions requests should be directed to mailto: [email protected] 

 For information about ‘Pay‐Per‐View and Article Select’ click on the following link: http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/ppv  

 


Recommended