1
CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
Ir. Dr. Rosli Mohamad ZinFaculty of Civil Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
2
CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
• Construction projects are generally complex , for this reason, delays and disputes are always present
• Involved many parties.
• When a project ends up in a dispute, the project will fail to meet its original goals and expectation.
3
Disputes (cont’d)
• Clients will suffer from high legal fees, delayed completion and occupation and general dissatisfaction.
• The contractor’s profits will diminish and to these will be added additional legal fees.
• No winners under these circumtances
4
CAUSES OF DISPUTES
• May arise on a construction project for a number of reasons:Late or non-payment for works satisfactorily
completed when payment is due.Inaccurate valuation of variations and works in
progress.Delays in the supply of general construction
information
5
Causes of disputes (cont’d)
Late issue of instruction varying some sections of the works.
Shortcomings, omissions and errors in contract documentation giving rise to ambiguities in contract requirements.
Failure of contractor to construct the works diligently and to programme.
6
Causes of delay (cont’d)
Increase in scope of work (changes, extras and errors) without proper consideration for extension of production time.
Untimely issue of variation instructions, which disrupts the contractor’s progress and programme of works.
Acceleration to complete within original programme without proper agreement over the payment.
7
Causes of delay (cont’d)
Poor workmanship and failure to use specified materials, skilled operatives and recognised methods.
Failure to inspect works in progress regularly and condemning only when works are completed.
8
(Cont’d)
• It can be deduced from the above list that the main areas of construction disputes revolve around:
payments contract documentation Time and cost overruns Construction information and site supervision
Owing to their diverse status, the view points of the project participants towards disputes areas vary;
9
View points of project participants
Disputes areas
Client Contractor Sub-contractor
Consultants
Time for completion
Late completion and payment for extended period expected
Insufficient: speed up production to avoid payment of penalty for non-completion
Under pressure to speed up production to programme
Sufficient; invocation of penanlty clause should contractor default
10
View points of project participant
Quality work’ship
Good quality product to specification assured
Good quality work’ship ensure future commission
Production to specified quality
Inspection; non payment for work below specified quality level
Payment Uncertainty of final cost of product due to variations and claims
Prompt; should reflect production cost and aid maintenance of good cash flow
Same as main contractor
Avoid over-payment, keep cost of variations within client’s budget
11
View points of project participant
Contract documentation
Should be reliable if all contentious points covered
Inadequate; ambiguous with hidden extra cost
Only part disclosed; inadequate
Adequate; clear enough for the execution of work
Construction information
Assured that is adequate, clear and timely issued
Late issue by client; inadequate; causes delay and disruption
Late, inadequate, disrupts production programme
Contractor possess enough information to carry on
12
Time completion
• Normally, project completion time is specified by the client, but when it is made an object of completion it is specified by the contractor.
13
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES
• Construction contract documents are often long and complex and contain contract terms (as guidance on courses of action should they have a difference of opinion)
• In theory, the express term of the contract should provide solution to any contractual disputes that arise.
14
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES (cont’d)
• In practice, some difficulties do arise in the definition of the express terms and their relation to the legalities of the event or events causing the dispute.
• This is likely to result in the need for a third party (court, arbitrator or mediator) to assist in the resolution of the dispute.
15
LITIGATION
• Litigation is a dispute procedure which takes place in the courts.
• It involves third parties who are trained in the law, usually barristers, and a judge who is appointed by the courts.
• Often expensive and can be a very lengthy process before the matter is resolved.
• Frequently extended to higher courts involving additional expenses and time.
16
ARBITRATION
• Is an alternative to legal action in the courts, in order to settle an unresolved disputes.
• All of the standard forms of contract used in the construction industry include an arbitration provision. (JKR 203A, CL. 54)
• Most commonly used for dealing with disputes that arise between the various parties concerned.
17
ARBITRATION (cont’d)
• Exercise of freedom in the selection of a third person (arbitrator) does not mean that an arbitration overrides the jurisdiction of the courts.
• The reverse rather is true as arbitration tends to follow the rules of the High Court.
• For this reason and also affirmation of this fact, pleadings, reports and evidence can be expected in arbitration hearing just as in a High Court.
18
ARBITRATION (cont’d)
• In spite of these, the two systems have major difference;
In arbitration, the parties may be represented by whoever they wish as opposed to barristers and solicitors normally retained in litigations.
Parties are obliged, under the principle of discovery, to disclose to each other the existence of all documents known to them which are relevant to the matters of dispute.
19
ARBITRATION (cont’d)
• Litigation is a procedure handled in public courts, while arbitration is handled within the construction industry.
• For this reason, arbitrators who are construction experts, and have also worked within the industry, hear construction disputes and hand down decisions.
20
ARBITRATION (cont’d)
• An arbitrator’s power are very wide.
• They may review and revise certificates and valuations.
• They may also disregard opinions, decisions or notices that have already been given.
21
THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF A VALID ARBITRATION AGREEMENT:
1. The parties must be capable of entering into a legally binding contract.
2. The agreement should whenever possible be in writing.
3. It must be signed by the parties concerned.4. It must state clearly those matters will be
submitted to arbitration, and when the proceedings will be initiated.
5. It must not contain anything that is illegal.
22
Arbitration and litigation comparisonArbitration Litigation
Duration Expedited process from start to decision
Lengthy process from start to judgment
Cost Saving in expense can be expected
High cost of legal representation
23
Arbitration and litigation comparisonArbitration Litigation
Privacy Assured; held in private, public excluded
No privacy, held in public
Flexibility Flexible; place, time and conduct to suit parties
Inflexible; place, time and conduct decided by the court
24
Arbitration and litigation comparisonArbitration Litigation
Formalities/advocacy Parties represented by anyone (matured/sane) parties may decide
Parties represented by qualified lawyers
Technical expertise Arbitrator has expert knowledge relating to technicalities of the dispute
High Court judge is well versed in the law but may lack expert knowledge relating to dispute
25
Arbitration and litigation comparisonArbitration Litigation
Business relationship Business relationship may be resuscitated
Relationship damaged by the outcome
Decision Made private; hence not damaging
Judgment made in public and hence damaging
26
Arbitration and litigation comparisonArbitration Litigation
Settlement finality
With few exceptions, final and binding
Operates appeals procedures
27
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
• Is a non-adversarial technique which is aimed at resolving disputes without resorting to the traditional forms of either litigation or arbitration.
• Was developed in USA & widely used.• Claimed to be less expensive, fast and
effective.
28
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (cont’d)
• Less threatening and stressful.• Offers the parties who are in dispute the
opportunity to participate in a process that encourages them to solve their differences in the most amicable way that is possible.
• Parties should have genuine desire to settle their differences without recourse to either litigation or arbitration.
29
CHARACTERISTICS OF ADR
The peculiar characteristics are as follows:
Non-binding proceedings: Proceeding are non-binding until a mutually agreed settlement is accomplished. Therefore, either parties can resort to (resume) litigation or arbitration if the procedures fail.
30
CHARACTERISTICS OF ADR (cont’d)
The peculiar characteristics are as follows:
Predisposal to settle : Before commencement of negotiation, the parties should genuinely predisposed to effect settlement without litigation or arbitration and, hence be prepared to compromise.
31
CHARACTERISTICS OF ADR (cont’d)
Senior management’s role: They play an active role in the resolution.Even when they are represented by a lawyer, senior management make the final decision that effect the settlements.
Influence of commercial interest:Negotiations and settlement are governed by commercial interest rather than rule of law.Therefore, ADR revolves around technical and commercial issues and seeks to maintain good business relationship.
32
32
characteristics Litigation Arbitration ADR
Place/conduct of hearing
Public court; unilateral initiation; compulsory
Private ; bilateral initiation ; voluntary
Private; bilateral; voluntary
Hearing Formal; before judge
Formal; conforming to rules of arbitration; before an arbitrator
Informal; before a third party (neutral)
33
Characteristics of Dispute Resolutioncharacteristics Litigation Arbitration ADR
Representation Legal; lawyers influence settlement
Legal; lawyers influence settlement
Legal only if necessary; disputants negotiate settlement
Resolution Imposed by judge after adjudication; limited right of appeal
Award imposed by an arbitrator; limited right of appeal
Mutually accepted agreements; option of arbitration if dissatisfied
34
Characteristics of Dispute Resolutioncharacteristics Litigation Arbitration ADR
Outcome Unsatisfactory :legal win or lose
Unsatisfactory : legal win or lose
Satisfactory; business relationship maintain
Time/cost Time consuming; uneconomic
Can be time consuming and uneconomic
Fast and economic
35
Common forms of ADR
Conciliation• A process whereby a neutral adviser listens to the
disputed points of each party and then explains the views of one party to other.
• An agreed solution may be found by encouraging each party to see the other’s point of view.
• With these approach, the neutral adviser plays the passive role of facilitator.
36
Common forms of ADR (cont’d)
• Recommendations are not made by the adviser, any agreement is reached by the parties agreeing to settle their differences.
• Where an agreement is achieved, then the neutral adviser will put this in writing for each of the parties to sign.
37
Common forms of ADR (cont’d)
Mediation
• In this scenario the neutral adviser listens to the representations from both parties and then helps them to agree upon an overall solution.
• An active role is played by the adviser by putting forward suggestions, encouraging discussions and persuading the parties to focus upon the key issues.