1
Ongoing activities in the Ongoing activities in the Czech RepublicCzech Republic
Jana ChladnáJana ChladnáNational Coordination AuthorityNational Coordination Authority
The Ministry for Regional DevelopmentThe Ministry for Regional Development
7. May 2010, Budapest7. May 2010, Budapest
Presentation outline
1. Structure of NSRF
2. Activities of Evaluation plan of NSRF
3. Periodical monitoring – financial, physical (indicators)
4. Concept of evaluating physical progress
5. Illustration of selected outputs
6. Conclusion
Czech OPs 2007-2013
Convergence Objective
OP Transport (ERDF + FS)Attractive environment
OP Environment (ERDF + FS)
OP Enterprise and Innovations (ERDF)Competitive Czech economy
OP Research and Development for Innovation (ERDF)
OP HR and Employment (ESF) Open, flexible and cohesive societyOP Education for Competitiveness (ESF)
7 x Regional OP (ERDF) Balanced territorial developmentIntegrated OP (ERDF)
OP Technical Assistance (ERDF)
Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective
Prague – 2x OP (Competitiveness, Adaptability)
European Territorial Cooperation Objective
5 Cross-border cooperation + 1 Inter-regional cooperation + 1 Supranational cooperation
Evaluation activities
2004-2008
- realized 70 evaluations (in value of 1,3 mil €)
2009
- 9 external evaluations were completed (437,5 tis. €)
Presently: created by NCA
- Monthly monitoring of implementation state
- Quarterly analyses fullfiling rules n+2/n+3
- Physical monitoring
management and implementation
support25%
enterprise and innovation
13%regional
development21%
development and modernization of infrastructure
7%
human resources development
21%
agriculture and rural development
10%
CSF/NSRF impact3%
Thematic focus of evaluations and analyses 2004-2008
Evaluation activities
2004-2008
- realized 70 evaluations (in value of 1,3 mil €)
2009
- 9 external evaluations were completed (437,5 tis. €)
Presently: created by NCA
- Monthly monitoring of implementation state
- Quarterly analyses fullfiling rules n+2/n+3
- Physical monitoring
The State of Implementation
The State of Implementation in billion EUR, European and national money
Source: MSC2007, 6.4.2010
1,74,6
13,032,9
31,0
0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0EUR billion
Certified Paid to beneficiariesApproved projects and global grants Submitted projectsTotal allocation 2007 - 2013
State of thematic OPs drawing
Data source: MSC2007, 6.4.2010
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
mil
. E
UR
Allocation 2007–2013
Submitted projects
Approved projects
Paid to beneficiares
State of regional OPs drawing
Data source: MSC2007, 6.4.2010
0
200
400
600
800
1 000
1 200
1 400
1 600
1 800
ROP N-W
ROP M-S
ROP S-E
Centr.
Mor
.
ROP N-E
ROP S-W
Centr.
Boh
.
Pragu
e Com
p.
Pragu
e Ada
p.
mil
. E
UR
Allocation 2007–2013
Submitted projects
Approved projects
Paid to beneficiares
Physical monitoring
Code Name of indicator Unit Base lineTarget Value
Commitment from beneficiaries
Reached Value
370200 Length of newroads (Core 14) Km 0,0 168,3 246,2 22,4
370502
Length of reconstructed high speed communications except TEN-T (Core 16)
Km 0,0 85,2 63,6 29,5
610100Length of new and reconstructed roads of Class II & III Km 0,0 1 360,5 896,0 630,9
610101 Length of new roads of Class II & III (Core 14) Km 0,0 N/A 18,6 6,5
610112 Length of newly constructed or reconstructed cycle-ways and cycle-paths Km 0,0 N/A 520,6 132,6
360300Increase capacities for energy production from renewable resources (Core 24) MW 0,0 320,6 3,0 2,5
610241Number of newly acquired environmental vehicles in the public transportation system number 0,0 239,0 40,0 0,0
632200 Number of reconstructed cultural monuments number 0,0 95 126,0 29,2
110300Number of newly created R&D jobs (FTE) (Core 6) number 0,0 3 610,0 750,1 178,8
364300 Reduction of energy consumption GJ/year 0,0 1 100 000,0 422 053,9 132 182,9
Sustainable development
Evaluation of int. on environmental impacts
- The system of bonification for projects with positive environmental impacts was established
- In context of SEA NSRF a list of 21 environmental indicators was created
- Evaluation is divided into 3 phases:
- evaluation of the systém - 2010
- evaluation of short-term results
- final evaluation of positive environmental impacts
Evaluation of int. on equal chances
- Purposely targeted projects (ESF)
- Projects with positive impacts (other OPs)
number Environmental indicator (SEA NSRF) Measuring unit
1 The decrease in CO2 emissions ton/year
6 The total length of revitalized flow meter
8The area of old ecologicalburdens being removed
m2
9 The increase of energyproduction from RES GJ/year
10 Reduction of energy consumption GJ/year
13Area of newly created or restored public green areas
ha
14Area of revitalized unused or deprived areas (brownfields)
ha
15Investments into the public transport development
mil. CZK
17 Decrease of noise-load on the inhabitants number people
Selected Environmental indicators
Sustainable development
Evaluation of int. on environmental impacts
- The system of bonification for projects with positive environmental impacts was established
- In context of SEA NSRF a list of 21 environmental indicators was created
- Evaluation is divided into 3 phases:
- evaluation of the systém - 2010
- evaluation of short-term results
- final evaluation of positive environmental impacts
Evaluation of int. on equal chances
- Purposely targeted projects (ESF)
- Projects with positive impacts (other OPs)
Physical monitoring - Indicators
- Improvement of physical monitoring- National sourcebook of indicators - Obligatory rules for creation and using indicators- List of aggregation- Technical solution of aggregation - Automatical daily aggregation of indicators from project
level has already started for 16 OPs of 17
- Indicators – evaluation of interventions efficiency
Concept of regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations
• Recently a concept of possible regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations was set up.
• 2 vertical levels
- 1. level of NSRF
- evaluation of fulfilling the objectives of NSRF
- evaluation according to priorite themes
- evaluation according to the geographical location (comparision of NUTS III units) – GIS data base tools
- 2. level of Operational programmes
- Evaluation of physical progress
- individual indicators
- summary evaluation of individual programmes priorite axis
Comparision of funding accordingto priority themes
Data source: MSC2007, 31.3.2010
3
6
Railway
4
7
Highways
5
1 2
0,0 25,0 50,0 75,0 100,0 125,0 150,0 175,0 200,0 225,0 250,0
Technical support
Others
Restoration of towns and rural areas
Tourism & Cutlure
Investments into social infrastructure
Education
Employment
Information society
R&D
Energy
Environment
Transport
Milliards CZK
Allocation
1 - Regional and local roads2 - Other roads3 - Raising in conformability 4 - Improvement of employment access5 - Improvement of social integration of disadvantaged persons 6 - Tourism7 - Culture
Concept of regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations
• Recently a concept of possible regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations was set up.
• 2 vertical levels
- 1. level of NSRF
- evaluation of fulfilling the objectives of NSRF
- evaluation according to priorite themes
- evaluation according to the geographical location (comparision of NUTS III units) – GIS data base tools
- 2. level of Operational programmes
- Evaluation of physical progress
- individual indicators
- summary evaluation of individual programmes priorite axis
Comparision of funding accordingto geographical location
Number of submitted projects applications (in mld. CZK)
33 - 40 mld. CZK40 - 70 mld. CZK70 - 90 mld. CZK90 - 113 mld. CZK
Shares of projects in the certain stages according to the geographical location
36 mld. CZK
Projects ejected from administration process
Projects in approval process
Approved projects
Data source: MSC2007, 6.4.2010
Concept of regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations
• Recently a concept of possible regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations was set up.
• 2 vertical levels
- 1. level of NSRF
- evaluation of fulfilling the objectives of NSRF
- evaluation according to priorite themes
- evaluation according to the geographical location (comparision of NUTS III units) – GIS data base tools
- 2. level of Operational programmes
- Evaluation of physical progress
- individual indicators
- summary evaluation of individual programmes priorite axis
Conclusion
Analyses are used for following objectives:• Identification of risks
- of individual OP objectives underflow
- allocation undraw (unfilling the rule n+2, n+3)• Recommendation for aiming the Proposal Calls to certain activity• Tools for assesment of proposed revisions of OPs
Monitoring• Highly developed in comparision with last programming period• Centralized and determined by obligatory rules• Better quality monitoring data for following evaluations
22
Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!
Contact:
Ministry for Regional Development
National Coordination Authority