1
WALK WILMINGTON A Comprehensive Pedestrian
PlanWilmington City CouncilFinal Plan Presentation
July 7, 2009
2Vision
• The City of Wilmington will become a pedestrian-friendly environment where citizens and visitors have safe and attractive alternatives for walking in and around the city.
3
Research & background data
4Public Survey
• Survey respondents and interviewees totaled 332• Pedestrian crossings most critical issue
(online 67% , in-person 29%)
• Factors making it unpleasant to walk– Missing sidewalks and sidewalk gaps– Drivers not stopping for pedestrians– Heavy traffic and fast moving vehicles
• Areas where improvements are needed– On major corridors – 80%– Near highway intersections – 65%– Near parks and recreation areas – 50%
• 76% would accept roadway delay if it made it safer to walk
5Public Comments
• “The existing built environment does not support pedestrian travel”
• “There are very few places that one does not require a car to get to”
• “Over 50% of bus stops do not have sidewalks”
• “Very few kids walk or bike to school”
• “At most major intersections, there are no pedestrian crosswalks or walk lights - cars rule”
6Staff and Agency Interviews
• City Departments– Engineering– Traffic Engineering – Police– Parks, Recreation & Downtown Services– Planning
• NCDOT– Division 3– Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation
• Cape Fear Public Transportation Authority (WAVE Transit)
• New Hanover County Public Schools
7Pedestrian Crash Statistics
• Wilmington second for number of crashes per capita
Top 10 North Carolina Cities for Pedestrian Crashes (2001-2005)
Number of Crashes
Percent of NC Total Population
Crashes per 10,000 People
Asheville 246 2.02 71,119 34.59 Wilmington 324 2.66 99,623 32.52 Gastonia 220 1.81 67,776 32.46 Charlotte 1730 14.20 671,588 25.76 Greensboro 595 4.88 247,183 24.07 Durham 510 4.18 217,847 23.41 Raleigh 840 6.89 375,806 22.35 Fayetteville 343 2.81 171,853 19.96 High Point 171 1.40 86,211 19.84 Winston-Salem 298 2.45 215,348 13.84
8Pedestrian Crash Statistics
• Cost of pedestrian crashes to Wilmington’s economy– Includes medical costs, public services, loss of productivity, employer cost, property damage and
change in quality of life
Cost of Pedestrian Crashes (1997-2005)
Injury TypeCumulative Injuries
1997-2005Cost per Injury1 Total
K Type Injury (fatality) 20
$4,200,00
0 $
84,000,000
A Type Injury (disabling) 45 $240,000 $
10,800,000
B Type Injury (evident) 207 $71,000 $
14,697,000
C Type Injury (possible) 240 $35,000 $
8,400,000 O Type Injury (property damage only) 29 $4,800
$ 139,200
Unknown 26
Total 567 $ 118,036,200
1 Estimate in 2007 dollars
9Identify Areas of Highest Demand for Pedestrian Facilities
Population Density
+School Proximity
+Park Proximity
+Allowable
zoning density
Demand for Pedestrian Facilities
10
pedestrian facility recommendations
11Recommended Improvements
• 450 miles of new sidewalks (publicly- and privately- funded)• 182 signal improvements (funded by NCDOT and the City)
– Retrofit pedestrian signals and crosswalks to existing traffic signals– Install new traffic signals with pedestrian signals– Install pedestrian hybrid signals and rectangular rapid flash beacons
• Phased over 20 years
• Prioritized areas with highest pedestrian demand
• Identified implementation and funding strategies– Grants (state, federal, non-profit)– Public-private partnerships– Concurrent with development– Capital improvement plan– Concurrent with road improvement projects
12Project Phasing
Improvements
Short(0-5 Years)
Medium(5-10 years)
Long(10-20 years)
Sidewalks 26 miles 206 mi. 240 mi.
Cost (approx.) $3.5 mil. $27 mil. $31 mil.
Signal/crossings
90 50 28
Cost (approx.) $4.1 mil. $1.9 mil. $1 mil.
Where (generally)
Downtown, older suburbs, along major arterials
Older suburbs, newer areas, arterials and major collectors
Newer suburbs, minor collectors
13Map of Recommended Improvements [Sample]
14
policy recommendations
15Policy Recommendations
• Amend Land Development Code
• Payment-in-lieu of constructing
sidewalks• Crosswalks and pedestrian signals at
signalized intersections
• New pedestrian signal types– Hybrid Pedestrian Signal (HAWK)– Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon
(RRFB)
• Reduce vehicle speeds
16Questions?
17
END OF SHOW
18
APPENDICES
19
planning inputs
20Planning Context
– Choices: Wilmington Future Land Use Plan
– Wilmington Vision 2020: Downtown Waterfront Plan
– WMPO Long Range Transportation Plan
– Cape Fear Historic Byway Corridor Management Plan
• Several complementary goals, priorities and strategies in other plans.
Sidewalk Priority Areas Map from Choices: Wilmington Future Land Use Plan
25Additional planning inputs
• Recent developments and ongoing initiatives– Safe Routes to Schools– Neighborhood Traffic Management Program– WAVE Transit route restructuring– Cross-City Trail and River to the Sea Bikeway– Riverwalk expansion
• Upcoming developments– Traffic signal system upgrade– Pilot scramble intersection– North 3rd Street streetscape project– Dawson Street and Wooster Street improvements– NCDOT spot safety improvements
26
Research & background data
27Online and In-Person Surveys
• Web based survey available from February through June• In-person survey conducted at Downtown at Sundown,
Saturday Farmer’s Market, Juneteenth Festival
28Field Analysis
• The Good– Lots of people walking– Good network downtown
• The Bad– Missing sidewalks along
arterials and in newer areas
– Many signals without ped signals or crosswalks
– Drivers don’t yield to peds
31
pedestrian facility recommendations
32Map Existing Conditions
• Existing sidewalks– Almost 290
miles
• Existing signalized intersections
• Existing pedestrian signal heads
• Existing trails and multi-use paths
33
37
policy recommendations
39Payment-in-Lieu ofConstructing Sidewalks
Concept• Allows applicants to
contribute money to sidewalk fund instead of building sidewalk
• Sidewalk projects can be phased or consolidated
• Money can be used to build facilities in places where they are most needed- even off-site.
Recommendation• City would establish fees for
pedestrian facilities
• Similar to park fees
• City would identify pedestrian benefit zones (next slide)
• Money must be spent within a defined time period
40Potential Pedestrian Benefit Zones
Concept• Complements
payment-in-lieu program
• Funds spent near the development and will benefit pedestrians in that zone
• Zones should focus on improving continuity and road crossings
52
Considerations• Higher speeds contribute to
increased likelihood of injury or death when hit
• Reduced speed limits provides opportunity to reduce travel lane widths-
• Pedestrian median refuges may be provided without increasing overall road width
• Wilmington may request speed limit reductions/modifications along NCDOT roadways within city limits
Intersections and Roadway DesignSpeed Limit Uniformity
55Intersections and Roadway DesignSpeed Limit Uniformity
Recommendation• Speed limits based on
road classification and surrounding land-use
• Lower speeds where pedestrians are likely to be present– Central Business District– Urban Core– Residential
neighborhoods
• Influences NCDOT roadway designs
56
design details
57Design Details
• Driveway design• Crosswalk marking
– Signalized intersections– Non-signalized
intersections– Midblock crossings
• Crossing islands and medians
• Parking lot design
e.g. Proposed Crossing Island Detail
58
programs
education, encouragement and enforcement
59Education, Encouragement and Enforcement
Education• Safe Routes to Schools
– Provides funds to support projects and programs
• NHTSA Child Pedestrian Safety Curriculum– Develops safe walking skills
in elementary school kids
• Collaboration with Media– Newspapers, web, radio
and television
Encouragement• Walk to School Day
– Annual event celebrating kids and parents walking
• Walking and Running Clubs– Regularly scheduled
events– Clubs for all ages and
abilities
60Education, Encouragement and Enforcement
Enforcement• Police training
– Pedestrian laws, rights and responsibilities
– Accurate crash reporting– NCDOT officer training
curriculum
• Targeted enforcement– Improve driver and pedestrian
behaviors• Jaywalking and failure to yield
– Crosswalk stings– Speed control