1. Taking Rural India System of Rice Intensification in
INDIA
2. Taking Rural India
3. Taking Rural India Government of India (Committee to Review
Institutional Credit for Agriculture and Rural Development ) March
1979 NABARD established on 12 July 1982 by an Act of Parliament of
the Republic of India as a Developmental Financial Institution
(DFI). By combining agriculture credit functions of Reserve Bank of
India (RBI) and refinance functions of the then Agricultural
Refinance and Development Corporation (ARDC). Genesis of
NABARD
4. Taking Rural India Why NABARD To review the structure and
operations of the Agricultural Refinance and Development
Corporation (ARDC) To examine the need for and the feasibility of
integrating short-term and medium term credit structure with
long-term credit structure To review the role of the Reserve Bank
of India (RBI) in the field of rural credit having due regard to
its central banking functions.
5. Taking Rural India Facilitating credit flow for promotion
and development of Agriculture, Small scale industries, Cottage and
village industries, Handicrafts and other rural crafts. Support all
other allied economic activities in rural areas Promote integrated
and sustainable rural development Secure prosperity of rural areas.
NABARD Mandate
6. Taking Rural India Promote sustainable and equitable
agriculture and rural prosperity through effective credit support,
related services, institutional development and other innovative
initiatives NABARD Mission
7. Taking Rural India Major functions of NABARD
8. Taking Rural India Organisational Set up
9. Taking Rural India
10. Taking Rural India NABARD-SRI programme in INDIA Transfer
of technology for coverage of 84,000 farmers Programme designed for
2-3 years Model Unit Approach adopted for field level
implementation Salient features of a Model Unit are as under : A
cluster of 16 villages and 25 farmers per village (total 400
farmers) identified for adoption of SRI technology in the first
year of implementation. Each identified farmer will undertake
cultivation of rice adopting SRI in his farm.
11. Taking Rural India NABARD-SRI programme in INDIA To
motivate the farmers to switch over to SRI, incentive by way of
grant input towards cost of markers, weeder, organic manure,
fertilizer, seeds etc. Provide hand holding support for field level
adoption a system of extension support is put in place through SRI
Facilitators and Coordinators. SRI promotion programme envisaged
replication of 150 such Model Units across 13 predominant rice
growing States. Total financial outlay under the programme was
assessed at Rs.25.68 crore ($3.66million), phased over two year
period
12. Taking Rural India Progress in implementation Programme
launched in 2010 planting season. The progress in implementation as
of 31 March 2015 is : Cumulatively 175 projects sanctioned in 13
States. Total financial commitment involved was Rs. 25.61 crore,
phased over three year period. Total no. of farmers benefited are
1.42 lakh in 2380 villages covering area of 36935.61 Ha.
13. Taking Rural India Major Impact Grain yield in SRI
indicates 194% increase while straw yield indicates an increase of
189% SRI method has done comparatively well even in condition of
poor rainfall with drought tolerant variety Number of effective
tillers per hill and number of grains per panicle have shown
significant increase under SRI Cost of cultivation reduced while
income level of small and marginal farmers increased.
14. Taking Rural India
15. Taking Rural India Economic situation and food security in
Jharkhand Population of 32.7 million located between elevation of
300610 MSL Climate Semi humid to humid semi-arid type. Maximum
population of State depend on agriculture as their livelihood
(70%). Food deficit in terms of demand and supply were 52% in
cereals. Mono-cropping, low cropping intensity, subsistence farming
25% of the total land was a fellow land Highest poverty in INDIA.
High rate of migration. 80% small and marginal farmers Rainfall
1200 mm but no storage facility Rice is the main crop of the
State
16. Taking Rural India Objective of implementation of SRI in
Jharkhand To create awareness about the SRI in tribal community. To
change farming system from subsistence to commercial farming To
reduce the demand supply gap and dependent on other State for rice.
To create a model for State Govt so as to make the SRI as main
agenda of State Help small and marginal farmers to adopt new
technology
17. Taking Rural India Project Implementation Strategy Phase I
Preparation of Model Project of SRI in consultation with leading
NGOs like, Sir Dorabji Tata Trust (SDTT), Watershed Support
Services and Activities Network (WASSAN), Professional Assistance
for Developmental Action (PRADAN). Phase II - Identification of RSA
(Resource Support Agency) and PIA for implementation in State. The
responsibility was given to District Development manager (DDM)
NABARD Phase III- Identification of Stakeholders and their capacity
building about SRI Phase IV - Sanction and implementation of
programme by NABARD Phase V - Preparation of future strategy/road
map for State Govt.
18. Taking Rural India Model plan of SRI Programme duration -
Two years Each NGO to cover 600 farmers (200 in 1st year and 400 in
2nd ) with 150 acre i.e., 0.25 acre per farmers. Maximum 25 farmers
per village. Coverage over 23 districts (out of 24) with of 52
projects and 49 NGOs. Target to cover 30000 farmers and 7800 acre
area. Monitoring of projects through 5 Resource Agencies (RAs)
i.e., technically qualified NGOs. Grant assistance for management
cost of $14230.00 per NGO.
19. Taking Rural India Salient features of project
Mainstreaming technology adoption. Awareness creation &
capacity building of PIAs and the famers through conduct of
appropriate programs & supply of training kits, publicity
materials etc. In-situ pilot demonstrations Provision of critical
inputs & implements (weeder and sprayer) Five experienced and
technically qualified NGOs to act as Resource Agencies
20. Taking Rural India Major Stakeholders of Project
21. Taking Rural India Role of Resource Support Agency (RSA) 5
RSA were identified and each RSA was allocated different PIA and
project
22. Taking Rural India Role of Project Implementing Agency
(PIA)
23. Taking Rural India Project Delivery Mechanism
24. Taking Rural India Grant assistance coverage
25. Taking Rural India Data Collection, Processing and
Documentation PIA to collect data & submit to RSO RSO compiled
data of PIA and submit data to NABARD NABARD compiled the data of
RSO and prepare a consolidated sheet Data Parameters - No. of
tillers/hill, No. Grain per panicle, Grain yield, Straw yield. Data
of different varieties captured Data in three type of land captured
i.e., Upland, Midland and Lowland Economic of SRI (Cost / Benefit)
derived at the end Data on food security for different land holding
classes calculated
26. Taking Rural India Project Target and Achievement
Particulars Target Achievement No of farmers 30000 34170 Area
(Acre) 7800 7350 Districts 24 23
31. Taking Rural India Land type-wise yield attributes
Effective Tillers Grains / Panicle
32. Taking Rural India Land type-wise yield attributes
(Continue.) Grain Yield Straw Yield
33. Taking Rural India Variety-wise grain yield in Upland Yield
in Q/Ha
34. Taking Rural India Variety-wise grain yield in Midland
Yield in Q/Ha
35. Taking Rural India Variety-wise grain yield in Midland
(Continue.) Yield in Q/Ha
36. Taking Rural India Yield in Q/Ha Variety-wise grain yield
in Midland (Continue.)
37. Taking Rural India Variety-wise grain yield in Lowland
Yield in Q/Ha
38. Taking Rural India Land Holding (Acre) Average Holding No
of Days of food security (Acre) Traditional SRI Add. food security
0-1 0.66 168 323 323 155 1-2 1.79 348 894 894 546 > 2 3.73 729
1838 1109 Results Additional food security
39. Taking Rural India Cost Benefit Analysis - Lowland
Components Rate/kg Traditional SRI Production in kg/acre Income ($)
Production in kg/acre Income ($) Income from Grain (in kg) 10 1,385
198 2,652 379 Income from Straw (in kg) 3 1,704 73 3,502 150 Total
Income 270 529 Cost of Cultivation 178 178 Benefit-Cost Ratio
(Total income / total expenditure) 1.52 2.97
40. Taking Rural India Cost Benefit Analysis Mid land
Components Rate/kg Traditional SRI Production in kg/acre Income ($)
Production in kg/acre Income ($) Income from Grain (in kg) 10 1,182
169 2,377 340 Income from Straw (in kg) 3 1,830 78 3,300 141 Total
Income 247 481 Cost of Cultivation 178 178 Benefit-Cost Ratio
(Total income / total expenditure) 1.38 2.7
41. Taking Rural India Cost Benefit Analysis Up land Components
Rate/kg Traditional SRI Production in kg/acre Income($) Production
in kg/acre Income ($) Income from Grain (in kg) 10 502 71 960 137
Income from Straw (in kg) 3 512 23 1,050 45 Total Income 95 182
Cost of Cultivation 82 120 Benefit-Cost Ratio (Total income / total
expenditure) 1.15 1.51
42. Taking Rural India Cost of cultivation Sr No. Particulars
Cost of cultivation in midland & lowland Cost of cultivation in
upland (in Rs/acre)(in Rs/acre) Traditional SRI Traditional SRI 1
Inputs 45 63 32 49 2 Labour component a. Human labour 95 80 37 56
b. Animal resource 21 21 13 13 3 Machinery rental 17 14 0 3 Total
expenditure