7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 1/37
1 Riveredge Associates
Investigation and Evaluation of Potential Blanding’s Turtle Nesting Habitat
and Results of Blanding’s Turtle Nesting Activity Surveys at the
Cape Vincent Wind Farm Project
Draft Report Prepared for:
Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 2003 Central Avenue
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001
Prepared by:
Riveredge Associates, LLC58 Old River Road
Massena, New York 13662
September 25, 2010
Riveredge Associates (Riveredge) is pleased to submit this report summarizing the purpose,
background, methods, results and recommendations of a Blanding’s turtle ( Emydoidea
blandingii) potential nesting habitat and nesting activity survey investigation conducted on the
site of the proposed Cape Vincent Wind Farm, Town of Cape Vincent, Jefferson County, New
York, in June 2010 (Figure 1). Riveredge Associates was contracted by Western EcoSystems
Technology, Inc. (WEST) to complete work reported herein as part of pre-construction wildlife
surveys conducted for the project.
PURPOSE
Riveredge performed site visits to the Study area to identify and evaluate areas within the Cape
Vincent Wind Farm Project’s zone of potential impact as potentially suitable Blanding’s turtle
nesting habitat. In areas with potential nesting habitat, Riveredge performed surveys for
Blanding’s turtle nesting activity, following the protocol developed by the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) (Ross 2009).
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 2/37
Riveredge Associates2
The primary purpose of Riveredge’s investigation were to 1) identify potential Blanding’s turtle
nesting habitats in areas surrounding wetlands with the potential to support Blanding’s turtles by
examining the soil substrate, vegetative characteristics, and other habitat parameters required for
Blanding’s turtle nesting, and 2) perform daily surveys for nesting Blanding’s turtles in areas
identified above.
STUDY AREA
The study area for the proposed Cape Vincent Wind Farm Project is located within the Town of
Cape Vincent, Jefferson County, New York (Figure 1). The study area is situated in the Eastern
Ontario Plain ecozone (Will et al., 1982). The Eastern Ontario Plain ecozone consists of nearly
level plains ranging in elevation from 76 to 152 m (250 to 500 feet) and averaging 91 m (300
feet). The bedrock consists of Trenton limestone. The soils are of medium productivity and are
primarily glacial lake sediments belong to either the Chaumont-Galoo-Wilpoint-Guffin series
(moderately deep to shallow, clay or loam soils) or the Kingsbury-Covington-Livingston series
(very deep, poorly drained clay soils) (USDA 1989). Annual snowfall is 152 to 203 cm (60 to 80
inches), and the growing season is 150 to 165 days. Agriculture is the predominant land use of
the Eastern Ontario ecozone. Due to the moderating climatological effects of Lake Ontario, this
zone is favorable to dairy farming and hay crops. All water bodies (Kent’s Creek, Fox Creek,
Shaver Creek, and several large wetlands) within the study area flow generally southwest and
drain into Lake Ontario.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 3/37
3 Riveredge A
Figure 1. Location of the Cape Vincent Wind Farm. Turbine locations illustrated as proposed May 27, 2
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 4/37
4 Riveredge Associates
BACKGROUND
The Blanding’s turtle is listed by the NYSDEC as Threatened in New York State (NYSDEC
1999). The Blanding’s turtle is documented to occur in the region of the Study area (Petokas and
Alexander 1981, Gibbs et al. 2007, New York Natural Heritage Program database), but detailed
survey information within the immediate vicinity is limited.
Existing records for the area include a known breeding population of Blanding’s turtles in a large
shrub/scrub, emergent wetland complex above the causeway at Wilson Bay (A. Breisch,
NYSDEC, personal communication; Johnson and Crockett 2009). In addition, several other
sightings have been made in the area in recent years. Two Blanding’s turtles were observed on
County Route 9 where it crosses Kent’s Creek in 2005 and 2007. A juvenile Blanding’s turtle
was observed on County Route 4 (Rosiere Road) approximately 1.5 km north of County Route 8
in 2007. Finally, a breeding Blanding’s turtle population, discovered in 2008, is known to exist
northeast of Cemetery Road near the northeastern edge of the Study area (Johnson and Crockett
2009). These records stem from the field work of Glenn Johnson (Johnson and Crockett 2009)
and were submitted for inclusion in the database of the New York Natural Heritage Program
(NYNHP). The Blanding’s turtle records of Johnson are more current and inclusive than the
database of NYNHP.
Primary wetland habitats occupied by Blanding’s turtle usually include productive, eutrophic
inland and deep freshwater wetlands (Ernst et al. 1994), especially shrub swamps with alder,
willow, cattail, and sedges, as well as emergent wetlands with shallow water composed of reeds,
grasses, and cattail (Peipgras and Lang 2000), with a soft but firm organic bottom and abundant
aquatic vegetation (Kofron and Schreiber 1985, Ernst et al. 1994). Specifically, Blanding’s
turtles use areas with the following characteristics (Kiviat 1997):
1) both shallow (30 cm) and deep (120 cm) pools connected by channels;
2) open or absent tree canopy;
3) tree species often along the wetland perimeter;
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 5/37
Riveredge Associates5
4) a dense cover of shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.) and buttonbush (Cephalanthus
occidentalis), with components of forbs and graminoids dispersed as hummocks and
tussocks throughout the wetland; and,
5) coarse and fine organic debris.
In addition, high quality Blanding’s turtle habitat consists of a “habitat complex” that provides
all of the wetland and upland habitat types used during springtime, breeding, nesting, summer,
and hibernation activities in close proximity to one another (Kiviat 1993). Springtime foraging
and basking habitat, consisting of deep, fluctuating pools, represents crucial habitat for
Blanding’s turtles (Kiviat 1993).
Blanding’s turtles nest in open upland areas and are known to utilize human-disturbed areas such
as plowed fields, road side berms, active agricultural row crop fields, and sand and gravel pits for
nesting (Linck et al. 1989, Johnson and Crockett 2006). Natural nesting sites have been
observed in grasslands characterized by sandy loam or sandy soils (Ross and Anderson 1990)
and areas with sparse herbaceous vegetation interspersed with bare mineral soil (Kiviat et al.
2000). In the vicinity of the Cape Vincent Wind Project, Blanding’s turtles are known to nest in
piles of topsoil and along dirt roads (G. Johnson, unpublished data).
Blanding’s turtles may move more than 1.0 km from wetland habitats to upland habitats for
nesting. The distance of potential nest sites from water varies from 2.0 m to greater than 1.0 km
(Congdon et al. 1983), and nest observations in areas adjacent to wetlands where they are not
considered residents have been recorded (Congdon et al. 1983, Ross and Anderson 1990). The
nesting season in northern New York occurs primarily during the month of June (Johnson and
Crockett 2006, G. Johnson, unpublished data). Both sexes of Blanding’s turtles occasionally
make significant overland movements outside of the nesting season, often staying in retreats in
forested uplands or vernal pools (Joyal et al. 2001, Johnson and Crockett 2006).
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 6/37
Riveredge Associates6
METHODS
Prior to the field investigation, Dr. Glenn Johnson, Professor of Biology at SUNY Potsdam and
Riveredge Senior Ecologist, reviewed available maps and aerial photography to identify areas of
potentially suitable Blanding’s turtle nesting habitat. National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and
State wetlands identified as consisting completely or partially of shrub/scrub vegetation were
noted.
Nesting activity surveys for Blanding’s turtles were conducted in suitable areas such as
grasslands characterized by sandy loam or sandy soils, areas with sparse herbaceous vegetation
interspersed with bare mineral soil and human-disturbed areas such as plowed fields, cornfields,
road side berms and shoulders, active agricultural lands and gravel pits. All field surveys for
Blanding’s turtles and their habitats were conducted in accordance with protocols designed by
NYSEC (e.g. Ross 2009).
Nesting activity surveys were conducted by direct observations from 1800-0000 hours (6 PM
to midnight) daily each day from 7 June through 27 June 2010 when air temperatures were >
10o
C (50oF). Observers walked potential nesting areas using binoculars, headlamps, and
spotlights fitted with red filters. Care was taken to avoid disturbing nesting turtles.
Surveys focused on locating 1) nesting female turtles, 2) evidence of digging, 3) turtle tracks,
and 4) nests destroyed by predators. Searches focused on habitat edges between potentially
occupied wetlands and potentially suitable nesting areas. All turtles and turtle nests were noted
and recorded, regardless of species. A WAAS-enabled global positioning system (GPS) was
used to record the location of all turtles or turtle nests encountered.
General weather conditions (% cloud cover, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, etc.)
and precipitation were recorded at the beginning of each survey and after any significant
change in weather conditions occurred. If the air temperature fell below 10o
C (50o
F) surveys
were concluded for that night.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 7/37
Riveredge Associates7
Observers recorded the date, time, turtle species encountered, GPS coordinates of each
individual (all turtle species) and any nests encountered (intact or depredated), and turtle
behavior. No Blanding’s turtle was handled for any reason until after it moved out of a potential
nesting area. After it has moved out of a potential nesting area, turtles were examined to
determine sex and whether or not a female Blanding’s turtle was gravid.
Surveys were designed to determine if suitable habitat was occupied by Blanding’s turtles.
Habitat would be considered occupied when a turtle was encountered.
Dr. Johnson previously performed a Blanding’s turtle habitat investigation over the period 7 – 9
November 2007, in and around portions of the study area, and all wetlands identified during that
survey were visited to determine if suitable nesting habitat was available. That field work was
not part of pre-construction surveys for this Project.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 8/37
Riveredge Associates8
FIELD INVESTIGATION AND RESULTS
Potential Blanding’s Turtle Nesting Habitat Investigation
On 3 June 2010, Dr. Johnson arrived at the Study area. After a period of orientation and review
of property access, Dr. Johnson visited all wetlands and surrounding potential nesting habitat on
the Study area where access was granted by property owners over the period 3 - 4 June 2010.
Wetlands and potential nesting habitat were characterized as potentially supporting Blanding’s
turtles if suitable habitat conditions were present (as outlined above).
Based upon the field investigation, four (4) sites in the Study area associated with potential
Blanding’s turtle habitat were determined to possess potential nesting habitat features and were
selected for Nesting Activity Surveys. The relative position of these four sites in the Study area
is depicted in Figure 2.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 9/37
Riveredge Associates9
Figure 2. Locations of Blanding’s turtle nesting survey sites on the Cape Vincent Wind Farm.
Turbine locations illustrated as proposed May 27, 2010.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 10/37
Riveredge Associates10
Sites 1 and 2
Site 1 (Figure 3) consisted of 1) the road shoulder and berms associated with Wilson Road, 2) a
field planted in corn bounded by an abandoned railroad grade, Wilson Road and a wooded
swamp bordering Kent’s Creek, 3) a portion of a cornfield adjacent to Wilson Road north of the
abandoned railroad grade, and 4) the roadway and bare substrate around the Cape Vincent
Transfer Station. The Transfer Station was not accessed directly, but was surveyed from Wilson
Road with binoculars. The surveyable area of Site 1 was approximately 23.3 acres. Photographs
of the site are included below (Photos 1, 2, 3, and 4).
Site 2 (Figure 4) consisted of the shoulder and roadside berms of Hell Street, and portions of a
cornfield adjacent to Hell Street. The surveyable area of Site 2 was approximately 6.9 acres.
Photographs of the site are included below (Photos 5, 6, and 7).
Potential Blanding’s turtle habitat associated with both Site 1 and Site 2 is a large forested
wetland complex located southwest of Wilson Road. This wetland is primarily a seasonally-
saturated palustrine forested wetland composed mostly of deciduous trees dominated by
American elm (Ulmus americana), ash (Fraxinus spp.), and maples ( Acer rubrum and A.
saccharinum). It drains eastward into Kent’s Creek near Hell Street. Within this wetland, an
extensive emergent marsh and shrub/scrub swamp is found near the intersection of Wilson Road
and the Study area boundary. This area has some marginal potential to support Blanding’s
turtles, although little surface water was observed at the time of the survey. Additional potential
Blanding’s turtle habitat is located along the riparian margins of Kent’s Creek and a small (less
than 0.25 acre) shrub/scrub wetland dominated by buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis)
located along the railroad grade just west of Kent’s Creek. At the time of the survey, no surface
water was present, however, it likely floods each spring from overflow from the adjacent Kent’s
Creek. Buttonbush is an indicator species for Blanding’s turtle in some parts of its range (Kiviat
1993). This wetland is likely too small to support a population of Blanding’s turtles, however
Kent’s Creek may serve as a movement corridor for this species and it may be occasionally
occupied. Other open habitat areas within the Study area that are adjacent to or near these
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 11/37
Riveredge Associates11
wetlands were judged unsuitable as Blanding’s turtle nesting habitat primarily because they were
largely agricultural fields in active hay production and the substrate was not exposed to the sun.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 12/37
Riveredge Associates12
Figure 3. Survey Site 1.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 13/37
Riveredge Associates13
Figure 4. Survey Site 2.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 14/37
Riveredge Associates14
Photographs of Site 1
Photo 1. View across large agricultural field at Site 1 bordered by Wilson Road in background.
Photo 2. Close view of substrate in the field described in Photo 1, Site 1.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 15/37
Riveredge Associates15
Photo 3. Depredated snapping turtle nest near shoulder of Wilson Road at Site 1.
Photo 4. View across fields bordering Wilson Road at the northern end of Site 1.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 16/37
Riveredge Associates16
Photographs of Site 2
Photo 5. View of road (Hell Street) crossing culvert on Kent’s Creek in Site 2.
Photo 6. Depredated snapping turtle nest at edge of Hell Street at Site 2.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 17/37
Riveredge Associates17
Photo 7. Open area and dirt roadway leading away from hell Street at Site 2.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 18/37
Riveredge Associates18
Site 3
Site 3 (Figure 5) consisted of the linear corridor of an abandoned railroad grade between Burnt
Rock Road and County Route 4 , an adjacent horse pasture consisting of a mix of exposed
substrate and a raised earthen berm, and open areas along the intersection of the abandoned
railroad grade and Burnt Rock Road. The surveyable area of Site 3 was approximately 16.2
acres. Photographs of the site are included below (Photos 8, 9, 10, and 11).
Potential Blanding’s turtle habitat associated with Site 3 is located to the southwest of the
abandoned railroad grade approximately 0.75 km northwest of Burnt Rock Road and consists of
seasonally-saturated shrub/scrub and emergent marsh. Water flows northeast through a small(45 cm diameter) culvert under the railroad grade. This wetland has been impacted by beaver
activity creating numerous channels, however, water levels were low (greatest pool depth
approximately 30 cm) at the time of the survey. Shrubs consisted of 90% willow (Salix spp.)
species. This wetland has potential to support Blanding’s turtles, showing essential habitat
features such as shallow and deep pools and channels, shrub hummocks for overwintering,
numerous elevated basking areas, a soft organic substrate and potential nesting areas nearby.
Limitations to Blanding’s turtle occupancy include its relatively small size linked to its distance
from a known colonizing source, limited submerged and floating aquatic vegetation, and low
water levels.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 19/37
Riveredge Associates19
Figure 5. Survey Site 3.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 20/37
Riveredge Associates20
Photographs of Site 3
Photo 8. Potential nesting habitat in horse pasture along abandoned railroad bed at Site 3.
Photo 9. View north of large field and horse pasture at Site 3.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 21/37
Riveredge Associates21
Photo 10. View south of horse pasture and woodlot at east side of Site 3.
Photo 11. Area where painted turtle nested at south end of horse pasture at Site 3.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 22/37
Riveredge Associates22
Site 4
Site 4 (Figure 6) consists of open areas and dirt tracks associated with a residence on the
southwest side of Cemetery Road and a large open field with some wetland features interspersed
with drier areas and exposed substrates west of the residence. The surveyable area of Site 4 was
approximately 21.2 acres. Photographs of the site are included below (Photos 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, and 18).
Approximately 250 m on the opposite (northeast) side of Cemetery Road from Site 4 is a
shrub/scrub wetland known to support a population of Blanding’s turtles.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 23/37
Riveredge Associates23
Figure 6. Survey Site 4.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 24/37
Riveredge Associates24
Photographs of Site 4
Photo 12. Disturbed substrate in field behind residence at Site 4. This area would likely beattractive to turtles for nesting.
Photo 13. Another view of field, bare substrate and debris at Site 4.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 25/37
Riveredge Associates25
Photo 14. View of construction debris and other materials piled along a dirt track in field at Site
4. Open character would be attractive to turtles for nesting.
Photo 15. View of edge of large unused field at Site 4. Note relatively open substrate.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 26/37
Riveredge Associates26
Photo 16. View of open field at western edge of Site 4.
Photo 17. Small open-canopy pool at field edge in Site 4. Boreal chorus frogs were observed inthis pool.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 27/37
Riveredge Associates27
Photo 18. Area of exposed and lightly vegetated substrate in one of the field at Site 4.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 28/37
Riveredge Associates28
Results of Blanding’s Turtle Nesting Activity Surveys
A total of 224.5 investigator-hours were logged on-site actively searching for turtles over 21
nights from 7 June to 27 June 2010. One survey (June 8) was shortened because temperature fell below the 10
oC (50
oF) lower limit to conduct surveys.
No Blanding’s turtles were observed in any of the four survey sites over the period 7 June – 27
June 2010. Additionally, no depredated nests or other sign of Blanding’s turtles were observed.
One painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) was observed nesting on 8 June and another gravid female
painted turtle was found on 13 June, both in Survey Site 3. Two depredated snapping turtle
(Chelydra serpentina) nests were found (9 and 10 June) along Wilson Road in Site 1. Ten (10)
individual snapping turtle nests were found along the edge of Hell Street on 9 June in Site 2 and
an additional two depredated snapping turtle nests were encountered on the edge of Hell Street
on 14 June at Site 2. Photos 3 and 6 depict depredated snapping turtle nests found during the
nesting activity survey. A summary of weather and daily field notes, by site, is provided in
Attachment A.
CONCLUSIONS
Blanding’s turtle habitat surveys determined that the vegetative structure, vegetative species
composition, and other habitat parameters present in and around four sites within the Study area
represented suitable nesting habitat for Blanding’s turtles.
Nightly surveys conducted during peak nesting times (6:00 PM to midnight) for 21 consecutive
nights from 7 June through 27 June 2010 recorded no Blanding’s turtles at the four sites with
suitable nesting habitat.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 29/37
Riveredge Associates29
REFERENCES
Congdon, J.D., D.W. Tinkle, G.L. Breitenbach, and R.C. van Loren Sels. 1983. Nestingecology and hatchling success in the turtle Emydoidea blandingii. Herpetologica
39(4):417-429.
Dowling, Z., T. Hartwig, E. Kiviat, and F. Keesing. 2010. Experimental management of
nesting habitat for the Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii). Ecological
Restoration Vol. 28 (2):154-159.
Ernst, C.H., J.E. Lovich, and R.W. Barbour. 1994. Turtles of the United States and
Canada. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C.
Gibbs, J.P., A.R. Breisch, P.K. Ducey, G. Johnson, J. Behler, and R. Bothner. 2007.
Amphibians and reptiles of New York. Identification, natural history, and
conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford UK
Kiviat, E. 1993. Tale of two turtles: Conservation of the Blanding’s turtle and Bog
turtle. News from Hudsonia 9:1-7.
Kiviat, E. 1997. Blanding’s turtle habitat requirements and implications for conservation
in Dutchess County, New York. Proceedings: Conservation, Restoration, and
Management of Tortoises and Turtles – An International Conference. pp. 377–
382.
Kiviat, E.G., G. Stevens, R. Brauman, S. Hoeger, P.J. Petokas, and G.G. Hollands. 2000.
Restoration of wetland and upland habitat for the Blanding’s Turtle, Emydoidea
blandingii. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3(4):650-657.
Kofron, C.P., and A.A. Schreiber. 1985. Ecology of two endangered aquatic turtles in
Missouri: Kinosteron flavescens and Emydoidea blandingii. Journal of
Herpetology 19:27-40.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 30/37
Riveredge Associates30
Johnson, G. and T. Crockett. 2006. Distribution, population structure, habitat
relationships and nesting ecology of Blanding’s turtle ( Emydoidea blandingii)
populations in northern New York: Final Report to Biodiversity Research
Institute. 30 p.
Johnson, G. and T. Crockett. 2009. Distribution, population structure and habitat
relationships of Blanding’s turtle populations in northern New York. Final Report
AMO5122, Grant T-2-1. New York State Dept. of Environ. Cons. 144 pp.
Joyal, L.A., M. McCollough and M.L. Hunter. 2001. A landscape ecology approaches to
wetland species conservation: A case study of two species in southern Maine.
Conservation Biology 15:1755-1762.
Linck, M.H., J.A. DePari, B.O. Butler, and T.E. Graham. 1989. Nesting behavior of
Emydoidea blandingii, in Massachusetts. Journal of Herpetology 23:442-444.
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered
Species Program. 2009 (Draft). Advisory Guidelines for Creating Turtle Nesting
Habitat.
http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/conservation/pdf/creating_turtle_nesting_
sites.pdf
New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). 1999. List of
Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Fish & Wildlife Species of New
York State. Available: http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7494.html (Accessed
June 10, 2007.)
Peipgras, S.A., and J.W. Lang. 2000. Spatial ecology of Blanding’s turtle in central
Minnesota. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3(4):589-601.
Petokas, P.J. and M.M. Aleaxander. 1981. Occurrence of the Blanding’s turtle in
northern New York. New York Fish and Game Journal 28:119-120.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 31/37
Riveredge Associates31
Riveredge Associates. 2010. Blanding’s turtle habitat improvement project: 2009 nesting
habitat monitoring activities. Draft Final Report prepared for the New York
Power Authority, White Plains, New York. January 2010. 38 pp.
Ross, A. 2009. Nesting activity survey protocol for Blanding’s turtles ( Emydoideablandingii). Version 1: May 6, 2009, drafted by Angelena M. Ross, Region 6
Wildlife Biologist. 2 pp.
Ross, D.A., and R.K. Anderson. 1990. Habitat use, movements, and nesting of
Emydoidea blandingii in central Wisconsin. Journal of Herpetology 24:6-12.
USDA. 1989 (McDowell, W.E.). Soil survey of Jefferson County, New York. United
States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with
Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station.
Will, G.B., R.D. Stumvoll, R.F. Gotie, and E.S. Smith. 1982. The ecological zones of
northern New York. New York Fish and Game Journal, Vol. 29, Number 1, Jan.
1982. 25 pp.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 32/37
Riveredge Associates32
ATTACHMENT A
DAILY FIELD NOTES SUMMARY
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 33/37
Riveredge Associates33
Weather data for daily Blanding’s turtle nesting surveys (June 7-27, 2010).
Date/Time
Air
Temperature0C
Water
Temperature*0C
%
Relative
Humidity
% Cloud
Cover
Wind
speed
(m/sec)
7 June / 1917 hours 19.6 19.0 59 75 0.5
8 June/ 1800 hours 17.9 27.0 58 5 1.4
9 June/ 1800 hours 13.1 15.0 90 100 0.9
10 June/ 1800 hours 19.1 21.0 8395
Light rain0.0
11 June/ 1800 hours 24.5 25.0 59 10 0.3
12 June/ 1800 hours 21.2 22.0 88 90 0.0
13 June/ 1800 hours 23.8 25.0 62 20 0.3
14 June/ 1800 hours 20.1 22.0 69 70 0.0
15 June/ 1800 hours 22.3 24.0 46 5 1.3
16 June/ 1800 hours 23.1 23.0 85 50 0.7
17 June/ 1800 hours 20.5 - 77 5 2.5
18 June/ 1800 hours 25.0 - 55 40 0.0
19 June/ 1800 hours 23.5 21.5 78 5 0.5
20 June/ 1800 hours 24.4 26.0 83 50 0.0
21 June/ 1800 hours 24.1 25.0 52 5 1.322 June/ 1800 hours 21.3 18.0 100
100
Rain0.3
23 June/ 1800 hours 24.0 16.9 80 95 0.2
24 June/ 1800 hours 25.5 28.8 74 5 0.3
25 June/ 1800 hours 22.1 24.9 80 5 1.1
26 June/ 1800 hours 16.8 19.5 93100
Light rain0.4
27 June/ 1800 hours 25.3 24.5 86 100 0.0
* Water temperature was measured in a wetland south of survey site 1
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 34/37
Riveredge Associates34
Summary of effort, staff and field observations at Survey Site 1
DatePerson
Hours
Field Team
Leader
Number of
Observers Notes/Observations
7 June 2.6 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
8 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
9 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2Depredated snapping turtle nest on Wilson Rd
D. Tidhar, G. Johnson and L. Harper present
10 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 Depredated snapping turtle nest on Wilson Rd
11 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
American toads calling
12 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
American toads and boreal chorus frog calling
13 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
14 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
15 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
16 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
17 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
18 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
19 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
20 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
21 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
22 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
23 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
24 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
25 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
26 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
27 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
Total 43.6
Hours per site indicate time actually spent searching for turtles; travel time and time spent walking from
vehicles to the survey site are not included in these values.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 35/37
Riveredge Associates35
Summary of effort, staff and field observations at Survey Site 2
DatePerson
Hours
Field Team
Leader
Number of
Observers Notes/Observations
7 June 2.6 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
8 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
9 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 210 depredated snapping turtle nests on
shoulder of Hell St
10 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
11 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
12 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
13 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
14 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2 Two depredated snapping turtle nests onshoulder of Hell St
15 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
16 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
17 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
18 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
19 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
20 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
21 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
22 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
23 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
24 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
25 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
26 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
27 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
Total 48.6
Hours per site indicate time actually spent searching for turtles; travel time and time spent walking from
vehicles to the survey site are not included in these values.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 36/37
Riveredge Associates36
Summary of effort, staff and field observations at Survey Site 3
DatePerson
Hours
Field Team
Leader
Number of
Observers Notes/Observations
7 June 2.6 J. Flaherty 2Gray fox observed No turtles observed
8 June 2.0 B. Hill 2Painted turtle observed nesting (UTM
E401053,N4885681; NAD 83)
9 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2Two painted turtle eggs found above nest
from previous day
10 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
11 June 2.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
12 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
13 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 Gravid painted turtle observed
14 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
15 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
16 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
17 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
18 June 2.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
19 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
20 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
21 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
22 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
23 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
24 June 2.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
25 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
26 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
27 June 2.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
Total 44.6
Hours per site indicate time actually spent searching for turtles; travel time and time spent walking fromvehicles to the survey site are not included in these values.
7/28/2019 2010-0925 CVW Blandings Turtle Report_2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-0925-cvw-blandings-turtle-report2010 37/37
Summary of effort, staff and field observations at Survey Site 4
DatePerson
Hours
Field Team
Leader
Number of
Observers Notes/Observations
7 June 2.6 J. Flaherty 2 Northern leopard frogs and American toad
tadpoles; No turtles observed
8 June 3.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
Temperature dropped to 9.4 0C by end of
survey
9 June 3.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
10 June 4.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
11 June 4.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
Gray treefrogs calling
12 June 4.5 J. Flaherty 2
No turtles observed
Gray treefrogs and American toad callingBoreal chorus frog observed
13 June 4.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
14 June 4.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed; common garter snake
observed
15 June 4.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
16 June 4.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
17 June 4.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
18 June 4.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
19 June 4.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
20 June 4.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
21 June 4.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
22 June 4.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
23 June 4.5 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
24 June 4.0 B. Hill 2 No turtles observed
25 June 4.0 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed; common garter snake
observed
26 June 4.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
27 June 4.5 J. Flaherty 2 No turtles observed
Total 87.6
Hours per site indicate time actually spent searching for turtles; travel time and time spent walking from
vehicles to the survey site are not included in these values.