2
CONTENTS
CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 2
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5
2. BRIEF NOTES ON THE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 6
3. CHANGES, EVALUATIONS AND AUDITS ................................................................................................. 8
4. PROGRESS BY AGIR THEME IN 2015 ..................................................................................................... 8
5. GOOD DONORSHIP PRINCIPLES .......................................................................................................... 18
6. FINANCIAL REPORT [NOTES AND EXPLANATIONS] ............................................................................. 21
a. Financial Performance.................................................................................................................... 21
b. Expenditure Structure .................................................................................................................... 21
7. CONCLUSIONS AND CHALLENGES ....................................................................................................... 23
7.1. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 23
72. Challenges ......................................................................................................................................... 23
8. ANNEXES: ............................................................................................................................................ 24
8.1. Financial Report .......................................................................................................................... 24
8.2. RISK ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................. 28
8.3. OVERARCHING RESULTS FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 32
8.4. CSO´S CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................ 79
8.5. CRONOGRAMA DE ACTIVIDADES DAS IPOs (IBIS, DIAKONIA, OXFAM E WE)] PARA 2015 ......... 88
8.6. LIST OF POS AND FUNDS TO POS IN 2015 .................................................................................. 96
3
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AAAJC Associação de Assistência e Apoio Jurídico às Comunidades
ACABE Associação Criança Boa Esperança
ACAMO Associação dos Cegos e Amblíopes de Moçambique
ACDH Associação Centro de Direitos Humanos
ADE Apoio Directo às Escolas
ADECRU Associação Académica para o Desenvolvimento das Comunidades Rurais
ADEMUM Associação para o Desenvolvimento das Mulheres de Murrua
AGIR Action for Inclusive and Responsible Governance
AMCS Associação da Mulher na Comunicação Social
AMME Associação Moçambicana das Mulheres na Educação
AMODEFA Associação Moçambicana para o Desenvolvimento da Família
AMUDEIA Associação das Mulheres Desfavorecidas da Açucareira da Manhiça
AMMCJ Associação das Mulheres Moçambicanas de Carreira Jurídica
AMPCM Associação Moçambicana de Promoção de Cooperativismo Moderno
AMUDZA Associação das Mulheres Domésticas da Zambézia
AWEPA African Western European Parliamentarians with Africa
CAICC Centro de Apoio à Informação e Comunicação Comunitária
CB Capacity Building
CBO Community Based Organizations
CEC Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares de Comunicação
CEDE Centro de Estudos de Democracia e Desenvolvimento
CESAB Centro de Estudos Sociais Aquino de Bragança
CIP Centro de Integridade Pública
CO Country Office (Mozambique)
CODD Centro de Estudos e Promoção da Cidadania, Meio Ambiente e Direitos Humanos
CRM Complaints and Response Mechanism
CS Civil Society
CSO Civil Society Organization
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
DB Duty Bearer
DECOM Associação de Defesa do Consumidor
EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
EoS Embassy of Sweden
FM Fórum Mulher
FRELIMO Frente de Libertação de Moçambique
FORCOM Fórum Nacional das Rádios Comunitárias
GDI Instituto para a Democracia e Governação
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GMD Grupo Moçambicano da Dívida
HAP Humanitarian Accountability Partnership
HO Head Office
4
HOPEM Homens pela Mudança
IESE Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Económicos
IPO Intermediary Partner Organization
INGO International Non-Governmental Organization
IPCC Community Consultative and Participation Institutions
KUKUMBI Associação de Desenvolvimento Rural
LDH Liga dos Direitos Humanos
MDM Mozambican Democratic Movement
MEAL Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning
MGD Millennium Development Goals
MISA Media Institute of Southern Africa
MULEIDE Associação Mulher, Lei e Desenvolvimento
NAFEZA Núcleo das Associações Feministas da Zambézia
NANA Núcleo dos Amigos da Natureza e Meio Ambiente
NCCAMS National Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
OAM Ordem dos Advogados de Moçambique
OE / EO Observatório Eleitoral/Electoral Observatory
PSCM-PS Plataforma da Sociedade Civil para a Protecção Social
PNDH Pressão Nacional para Direitos Humanos
PFM Public Finance Management
PROPAZ Associação Instituto para a Promoção da Paz
RBA Rights Based Approach
RBM Results Based Management
RECAC Rede de Comunicadores Amigos da Criança
REDE CAME Rede Contra o Abuso de Menores
RENAMO Resistência Nacional de Moçambique
RENSIDA Rede Nacional de Associações de Pessoas vivendo com HIV&SIDA
RH Right Holder
RO Regional Office
RSHR Sexual Reproductive and Health Rights
RUTH Rede Uthende
SA Sociedade Aberta
SE Swedish Embassy
SEKELEKANI Centro de Estudos de Comunicação para o Desenvolvimento
STAE Secretariado Técnico de Administração Eleitoral
ToC Theory of Change
WLSA Women and Law in Southern Africa
YP (PJ) Youth Parliament /Parlamento Juvenil
5
1. INTRODUCTION This is the 2015 AGIR II Overarching Report (Narrative and Financial), presenting and analyzing the main
activities implemented during the year under review, and also briefly stating the results achieved by the
AGIR Programme – coordinated by four INGOs, namely Diakonia, IBIS, Oxfam and We Effect,
denominated Intermediary Partner Organizations (IPOs) – through its implementing partner
organizations (POs).
The second phase of AGIR, or AGIR II, has been designed to last for six years (2015-2020); the six-year
period is divided in two parts: the first one (2015-2017) and the second one (2018-2020). Structurally,
the Results Framework has been designed to consider reflective reporting in terms of results by the end
of each of the two aforementioned periods, with very precise qualitative and quantitative indicators to
measure progress, having as reference the baseline done at the start of the programme (1st January
2015).
As a logical consequence of the reporting structure, and bearing in mind that AGIR is a democratic
governance and human rights programme, in 2015 and 2017, the first two years of the first period; and
in 2018 and 2019, the first two years of the second period; the annual report has, thus, to adopt a
progress description and/or discussion perspective, i.e., by – methodologically speaking – provision of
elements (progress markers) showing what is being done towards the intermediary (31st December
2017) and final (31st December 2020) end-lines. A comparatively more profound description of activities
undertaken in 2015 [the same will apply in 2016, 2018 and 2019], will be found in the disaggregated
reports of the four Sub-programmes of AGIR.
Up to its end, in 2020, AGIR envisages: “A Mozambican society where its citizens, particularly also
women and other presently marginalized groups, fully enjoy their rights to social inclusion and gender
equity, to retribution of wealth created from the country’s patrimony, to accessible and affordable public
services of good quality, to basic civil freedoms and to political representation and participation; in a
peaceful and ecologically sustainable environment”.
The change building process is synthetized in an overarching Theory of Change, which has two
components: (a) a theory on how partner organizations’ capacity can be enhanced to increase their
effectiveness and relevance as civil society organizations who aim to impact on the different duty
bearers, in the five thematic fields1; and (b) a theory on how the partner organization can actually bring
about such structural and sustainable change on the rights situation. The first theory is in essence a
theory about organizational and institutional development. The second one is fundamentally a theory
about social change dynamics.
1 Right to Inclusion and Equality; Right to Retribution of Wealth Created from the Country’s Patrimony; Right to Accessible and Affordable Public Services of Good Quality; Right to Basic Civic Freedoms; and Right to Political Representation and Participation.
6
This report comprises seven sections, the first one being the introduction. Section two is reserved for
brief notes on the context, with special focus on the enabling and disabling environment and on the
democratic environment as such. Section three is a synthetic presentation of main changes, evaluations
and audits occurred and/or realized during the year under review. Section four contains notes on
progress in each of the six AGIR themes (five strictly programmatic and one on CSO´s capacity
development). Section five is on how AGIR dealt with good donorship underlying principles in 2015.
Section six is dedicated to financial reporting. Section seven is on conclusions (mainly on whether the
programme´s' relevance has been confirmed on its first year of the second phase, including core
achievements).
2. BRIEF NOTES ON THE CONTEXT This section summarily describes how the foreseen context for the year under review was in terms of
actual dynamics. The basis for this is the context analysis considered in the AGIR II Overarching
Proposal.
At an overarching level, AGIR identified, for its six year duration (2015-2020), two dimensions of
contextually relevant aspects: (i) enabling and disabling environment; and (ii) democratic environment.
For the year under review (2015), both dimensions did impact at AGIR at large, mainly at the country
level, as the following situations do substantiate:
▪ Enabling domain: (i) The inauguration address by President Filipe Nyusi, by the beginning of the
year, in which he did emphasize the need for all (citizens, unions, civil society, political parties,
etc.) to participate in the governance process, followed by another one during the swearing in
ceremony of his cabinet members (ministers), may have functioned as a call for openness: most
probably, that explains the reasons for many cases the establishment of MoU with duty bearers
was, in 2015, easier than in the previous years; (ii) The approval, by the Government, of the
Right to Information by-law was a very positive news for the environment under which AGIR
operates. Actually, effective legal framework for access to information is of great relevance for a
governance and human rights initiative such as AGIR programme. Nevertheless, the late
approval of the by-law (December 2015) turns it impossible to account on the fulfillment of its
norms and principles by relevant duty bearers;
▪ Disabling domain: (i) The worsening of the political and military stand-off between the
Government and Renamo, the main opposition party, eventually happened to be the most
serious threat to the environment in which AGIR is meant to operate; (ii) Cases of clear attack to
critics (individual and CSO´s, as well as any other kind of dissent), in social media platforms and
on media historically close to the Government, may have caused fears within rights-holders and
CSO´s in terms of holding the Government accountable in burning and sensitive issues.
Consequently, both the IPO´s and the PO´s felt a sort of scaling up government´s control and
scrutiny over PO´s and IPOs´ work. This somehow contrasts with what the incumbent President
7
said during his swearing in, leading to readings related to the probably existence of more than
one ‘power centers’.
The coexistence of enabling and disabling factors showed that actions undertaken by rights-holders
through AGIR PO´s, on one hand, and the receipt and/or reaction of duty bearers (over which change is
supposed to happen, before the societal degree of change), on the other hand, rely on a sort of love-
hate environment. Formally, the democratic environment was friendly to civil society’s work, but the
bad receipt of criticism, mainly directed to the Government, whose party is in a majority position at the
National Parliament2, suggested that collaboration and/or partnership with CSO´s is maybe motivated by
a strategic positioning rather than by a matter of conviction.
The quasi-war lasting from 2013 and which worsened by second quarter of 2015 affected some AGIR
planned actions (e.g. 1. Trainings which were meant to be done by CAICC in Gorongosa, Sofala
provinceProvince, ended-up being postponed; 2. Field visits to Buzi and Nhamatamba in Sofala (with
Wadzafica and PNDH) were not realized due to fearing of armed conflict)., mainly in the provinces of
Sofala, Manica, Tete and Zambézia; about 11 thousand Mozambicans fled to neighboring Malawi,
receiving support from ACNUR; this occurred in an economic recession situation (positive economic
growth, but below the expectations), as for the first time in the last 15 years economic growth was of
just approximately 5%. International crisis in commodity markets affected the extractive sector, with
some companies withdrawing investment plans (Vale in Tete and Mozal in Maputo, for example) or
giving-up to their presence in the country (Rio Tinto in Tete, for example). Food insecurity increased:
floods in central and northern Mozambique and droughts in the south caused devastation in cattle
population, which originated internal migrations and resulted in deaths caused by hunger.
The outlook for 2016 suggests that the socio-economic situation may become even worse: after
disclosure, in international media, of a secret loan in the beginning of 2015 (Mozambique tuna scandal,
amounting to USD 850 million - EMATUM), another three hidden debts, contracted without the
mandatory approval from the Parliament, have been revealed by the beginning of 2016: Proindicus (a
company linked to security services) with more than USD 800 million; Nacala Naval Base with USD 550
million; and a loan of 130 to 200 million USD, apparently channeled to the Home Affairs Ministry, for
unknown purposes. The exposé was done by international media and the immediate effect was the IMF
freeze of funds which were to be disbursed to Mozambique by mid-April under the IMF bailout for
Mozambique; IMF’s position was, then, followed by the US Government, DFID, Canada and traditional
Mozambican Programme Support Partners, formerly known as G-19 but now comprising the 14 partners
that support the State Budget.
As the cost of living is constantly increasing, leading to a wide peoples’ frustration, as witnessed by
media reports, social unrest may occur any time and calls for demonstrations, initially led by anonymous
entities, and then by some political parties (Partido Ecologista, PIMO and PT) and CSO´s (Fórum Mulher,
2 In 64 parliaments [one national one; 10 provincial ones; and 53 local/municipal assemblies] in Mozambique, Frelimo, the party in Government, has got an absolute majority in 57 of them.
8
LDH, IESE, HOPEM, GMD, WLSA, etc.) are being made since mid of April, but only one (led by CSO´s)
happened (18th June, 2016), after several threats by anonymous people apparently linked to the
intelligentsia. . The Metical, the local currency, is facing huge depreciation to both the United States
Dollar (USD) and the South African Rand (ZAR), and, as a consequence, the country is witnessing a
spiraling increase in prices. Prices of public transportation and bread have not yet increased but only
due to a political management of the situation – probably not sustainable for long: media is already
reporting on closure of some bakeries in the suburbs of Maputo.
3. CHANGES, EVALUATIONS AND AUDITS This section describes what was done in 2015 within the AGIR Programme (focus on PO´s); highlight is
placed on relevant changes, evaluations and audits. A connection to the following year (2016) is also
briefly stated.
A holistic AGIR Partners Satisfaction Survey, conducted by external persons (individual or companies),
was supposed to have been conducted (initiated and concluded) in 2015, but that did not happen, as the
process ended-up beginning just by the end of the year under review, as IPO´s spent much more time
discussing the approach to be adopted, plus what they were expected to do, as individual organizations,
in line with their systems or orientations from their head offices3.
The four IPO´s carried out external and independent audits, under which specific recommendations (e.g.
absence or problematic procurement, payment authorizations by staff not entitled to, lack of proper
accounting software and insufficient asset registers.) were drafted. In some cases, the seriousness of the
recommendation obliged the IPO´s, based on relevant contractual arrangements, to request funds back
from two PO´s (LDH and CEDE).
Although the four IPO´s had unqualified audit reports, each IPO does include, on its individual annual
report, programme cases both at their (IPO) and/or PO levels that describe what needs to be addressed
in 2016. Overall, the most frequent cases highlighted in the IPO´s recommendations are as follows: i)
weak documentation systems; ii) delayed disbursements; and iii) quality and quantity of monitoring
visits (including follow up of findings).
4. PROGRESS BY AGIR THEME IN 2015 This section does consider an analytical account of progress in the five AGIR themes, plus what was
the situation in terms of CSO´s capacity development (which is theme six for AGIR).
For all the AGIR below mentioned themes, the final outcome is: “The emergence of an active, strong and
vibrant civil society in Mozambique, who legitimately raise and channel the voice of the female and male 3 The task was commissioned to the consultancy firm Keystone Accountability, which is to end the work during the first quarter of 2016. Relevant report for be considered in the overarching AGIR II report for 2016 (by beginning of 2017).
9
rights-holders who are at present being politically, socially and economically marginalized, secure their
access to all information they need to exercise their civic rights, and effectively participating in and
influencing of the course of policy decision-making process and accountability of the duty bearers for a
transparent, democratic, inclusive, gender just and human rights sensitive governance”4.
After mentioning which IPO´s are working/contributing in/to a specific theme and stating correspondent
Long-term Objectives (LO), attention will be given to analytical notes on the progress in 2015.
Methodologically, the succinct analysis will adopt the progress markers approach, as the intention is to
briefly describe what is being developed so that the target set for the end of the first three years of AGIR
(by 31st December 2017) can be seen as being progressively met.
Theme 1: Right to Inclusion and Equality
In this AGIR Theme, three of the four IPO´s are active: namely Oxfam – LO´s 2 and 3 -; We Effect - LO 2-
and Diakonia - LO 1-
Notes on the Progress in 2015:
According to 2015 Annual Report from some PO´s under Diakonia Sub-programme there was an increase on public resources allocation for improved universal access to key public services (justice, education, health, SRHR and social services) by the most vulnerable groups in 2015. About 63.5% of the state budget (3, 4 thousand million Dollars) were allocated to the social and economic sectors against 2.7 thousand million Dollars in 2014 (52. 7%) representing an increase of budget allocation to social and economic sector of about 10.8%. The education sector has received 1,248 million Dollars, corresponding to 22, 8% of the total budget expenditure, against 1,035 million Dollars in 2014 (19.8% of the total budget). The health sector has received 561, 5 million Dollars (10.2% of the total budget), representing an increase of 1, 1% against 477, 6 million Dollars in 2014, when the expenditure attained 9.1%5. Regarding budget allocation that would contribute to more access to justice and social protection, the scenario from the 2015 budget was as described below. Total budget allocated for the judicial system was of 3, 525.6 million Mozambique’s Metical (MZM) in 2014, which is equivalent to 1.9% of the total budget. In 2015, the budget allocated was of 4,001.7 million MZM, equivalent to 2.0 % of the total state budget for that year. For social protection and labour, the proposition of state budget allocated was 6,509.7 million MZM, equivalent to 3.5% of the total budget in 2014. In 2015 there was an increase of 0.1% (3.55) in the total State budget amount allocated, equal to 7,087.5 million MZM. Although there was a small increase, resource allocations for the most vulnerable groups were scarce6.
4 AGIR II Overarching Proposal, 5th Version 5 Orçamento do Estado de Moçambique cresce em 2015 para 6315 milhões de dólares, 2016, http://www.macauhub.com.mo/pt/category/noticias/, 22/03/16, 12:15:00 6 Previsão das Despesas nas Áreas de Protecção Social De forma a prosseguir com a implementação da Estratégia de Protecção Social Básica que tem como objectivo mitigar o impacto do custo de vida da população mais
10
Considering that the most vulnerable groups are more concentrated at provinceProvince and district levels, the 2015 State budget has reduced the percentage of budget allocated centrally from 69% to 59.8% increase over the provincial budget (from 17.8% to 23.2%), district (from 11.8% to 23.2%) and municipalities (from 1.4% to 1.6%).this scenario meant that there was more money to be allocated to those allocation decisions. However, the above mentioned positive changes, verified in 2015, that are in line with what AGIR has set as the Sub-programme expected outcomes for this theme, cannot be attributed to actions undertaken in 2015 by PO´s, but as an aggregation of the work that has been done in previous years. A set of public policies, laws and by-laws/regulations creating an enabling framework/ environment for a broader social inclusion, of the most vulnerable rights holders, have been approved or reviewed by relevant duty bearer’s (Parliament/National Assembly). Some examples:
✓ Approval of the National Strategy for Prevention and Struggle to Premature Marriage in Mozambique (in December 2015);
✓ Approval of the new National HIV and AIDS Response Strategy (PEN V); ✓ Approval of the revised penal code that removed ambiguous legal aspects that threatened the
realization of human rights of the sexual minorities and incorporated articles that decriminalize the abortion;
✓ Approval of a State Budget [for 2015] considering some of the suggestion channels by some CSO´s [CIP, CEC, IESE, GMD, through the Fórum de Monitoria Orçamental (FMO)] to the Parliamentary Commission of Plan and Budget.
In 2015, part of the Sub-programme partners, together with their constituency and represented groups, “…have brought the inclusion agenda into the public policy making and decision debate on key services (access to education, health, SRHR, access to justice and political participation) at different levels ( district, province, municipality and national levels)”. The main focus of inclusion was around:
✓ Social, political and economic Inclusion of people with blindness with special focus on access to education, health, justice and other public and private services (e.g. bank credit);
✓ Children inclusion in debate on issues that affect their lives (trough mechanisms like child parliament etc.) and access to basic public series trough more budget allocation to children social protection;
Over the reporting period, OXFAM PO´s referred that the number of women that have reported to have
suffered from gender based violence increased in 5%, from 15,628 in January 2015 to 16,372, in
December 2015, according to some partners’ (AMME, WLSA, FM, NAFEZA, HOPEM, Lambda, PNDH,
Nweti) 2015 Annual Reports. It is important to highlight that on the one hand the increase of people
that reported having suffered from GBV might be seen as a concern due to increase of wave of violence.
But on the other side, and considering the expected outcome, the increase of people that report having
suffered from GBV is a result of the work performed by CSO´s on sensitizing GBV survivors to report
abuse. Additionally, 128 districts provided SRHR services, with 35 health units implementing initiatives
desfavorecida, está previsto o montante de 3.522,3 milhões de MT, onde o número de beneficiários passará dos 439.144 previstos em 2014 para cerca de 475.097, em 2015, um aumento nominal de 8,2%.
11
aimed at humanizing health services. Furthermore, specific legal frameworks related to promotion of
rights of marginalized groups were approved, including the revision of the HIV and AIDS National
Strategy (PENIV) and the approval of the Penal Code. Both documents include provisions aimed at
protecting the rights of marginalized groups such as LGBT, children, women, the disabled and PLWHA.
We Effect: On what regards CSO´s and rights holders successfully influencing formulation and
implementation of policies on promoting equitable rural growth and right to food, it is important to
mention that partners such as AMPCM, AENA, OMR, ORAM, UNAC and UPCT, were involved in lobby
and advocacy activities aiming to influence formulation and implementation of policies relating to food
rights. Proposals concerning related tax regimes and participation in consultations regarding the rural
development and food security strategies and plans for reduction of chronic malnutrition are just some
examples of activities carried out in 2015. Several processes in which the partners have participated
have resulted in an approved document in 2015. Although partners might not fully agree with the
contents of these documents, the fact that they are consulted and participating is a good step towards
successful influence over the formulation process. However, it is more challenging to receive approval
on proposals and influence implementation. As this is a long-term outcome, continuous effort will be
made to fully reach this outcome at a further stage of Programme implementation.
Theme 2: Right to Retribution of Wealth Created from the Country’s Patrimony
In this AGIR Theme, three of the four IPO´s are active, namely Oxfam (LO 4); IBIS (LO 1) and We Effect (LO 1). The main achievements are as follows:
Notes on the Progress in 2015:
IBIS and Oxfam: The recent data (2015) provided by Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) 6th
annual report shows that the contribution from the country´s patrimony in extractive sector (mining and hydrocarbon area) [excluding capital gains] in the State budget was only 2.65%. This contribution is very low, when compared to other figures that report that the extractives sector was responsible for 30% national exporting, with about, 17.6% dominated by coal, 8.2% for natural gas and 4.2% for heavy sands. However, when we make a connection within areas with natural resources abundance, we realize that the poverty indexes, calculated by household (Survey Family Budged IOF2014/015) are far from achieving the indicator (42%), and the average poverty index is around 45% in those areas.
Figures presented above on the contribution of the extractive industry are in line with the debate
around extractive industry in 2015, through which it became consensual among key players of the sector
that the reality about the revenues from the extractive industry is, by far, below the higher expectations
on the extractive industry prospects.
We Effect: Almost all the PO´s under NACE Sub-programme were, during the year under review,
involved in lobby and advocacy actions relating to land rights and natural resources. As part of that,
more than 30 processes, of which 7 position papers, 15 seminars and workshops and 8 demonstrations
were carried out in 2015 with common involvement of PO´s and rights holders. The civil society is strong
12
and vibrant in regard to these issues and is successful in its role as a watchdog to the government. PO´s
reports describe various examples of positive decisions and measures taken by the Government
considering CSO´s recommendations (e.g. The launch by MITADER of the Project “Terra Segura”, were
5 million DUAT´s should be given to communities by 2019; the agreement on revising the Prosavana
Master Plan, the revision of resettlements processes in areas with mining, gas, and natural resources
investments, etc.). However, this is a difficult area of change with many challenges in terms of political
will from the private sector and the government itself. In short, the level and variety of involvement
from the civil society is highly satisfactory, but the effect it has on the fulfillment of rights is still
somewhat limited. This area hence continues to be an area in need of support and advocacy action, to
strive towards the fulfillment of the long-term outcome within the provided timeframe.
Theme 3: Right to Accessible and Affordable Public Services of Good Quality
In this AGIR Theme, the four AGIR IPOs are active, in these terms: Oxfam (LO 1); IBIS (LO 3); We Effect
(LO 3) and Diakonia (LO 4).
Notes on the Progress in 2015:
Diakonia: there is a remarkable increase of public resources (% of the total state budget) allocated for
improved universal access to key public services (justice, education, health, SRHR, and social services) by
the most vulnerable groups. The state budget of 2015 indicates that there was an increase of budget
allocated for the improvement of key public and basic services as mentioned in theme rights of inclusion
and equality.
“Increased recognition, by the duty bearers (the elected and the professional civil servants), on the
demands made, by rights holders, for the need for improved state performance in the provision of public
services quality (access to education, health, SRHR, justice, social services) in Mozambique”. However,
the recognition required still remains discursive and few material measures have been taken by the duty
bearers to increase government performance in providing services.
IBIS: In 2015, initial work towards the achievement of the enjoyment of the right to accessible and
affordable public services of good quality was initiated. The various activities that aimed at
disseminating the RTIL among female and male rights-holders, duty bearers and civil society
organizations and, introduction of ICT´s to right-holders, female and male members of the
(sub)committees, were the highlights of 2015 in pursuit of the right in question. Initial signs of
improvement in the performance of the subcommittees (education) that benefited from training, were
already visible in 2015, as such committees started meeting more regularly for planning and managed to
create different task forces to operationalize their role to monitor the use, for example, of Apoio Directo
às Escolas ADE funds and inform communities, with Zambézia (Mocuba, Alto-Molócuè and Quelimane)
being the province in which that was witnessed in monitoring visits
13
Actions that looked at increasing collaboration between CSO´s and local government bodies such as:
signing of MoU´s7 and, joint organization of relevant initiatives between CSO´s [mapping of schools and
health units for the purposes of monitoring and coverage and quality of services, by Solidariedade (a PO
based in Nampula) and District Directorate of Education and Health, in Moma, Larde, Nacala Porto and
the Nampula city municipality, all in Nampula province] and local government institution, were also
reported in 2015 in selected provinces and districts. The dissemination of RTIL was always a present
aspect in both initiatives.
We Effect: Rights holders (women and men) are empowered to advocate for, influence, monitor the
implementation of, and hold duty bearers accountable for measures that secure a safe and healthy
environment and promote resilience to climate change impacts.
AGIR partner organizations are involved in various advocacy and monitoring actions. These included
participation of PO´s in international and national events such as COP21, held in November 2015 in
Paris. Several partners (ABIODES; JA; LIVANINGO) were involved in the preparatory work for COP21
together with MITADER to formulate a Mozambican position during the conference. JA! and LIVANINGO
participated in the conference and were part of a global civil society march to promote specific climate
actions and climate justice and also participated in several workshops, giving voice to Mozambique’s
problems and position on climate change. The involvement of rights holders in this area is still subject
to improvement. Climate change and environmental issues are fairly complex and abstract issues that
challenge the involvement of rights holders in the advocacy process. Therefore, partners are also on
large-scale raising awareness and conducting trainings, to increase the understanding of how these
areas affect rights holders in their everyday life and therefore demands action.
Theme 4: Right to Basic Civic Freedoms
In this AGIR Theme, one of the four AGIR IPOs (IBIS) is active: IBIS on its LO 4
Notes on Progress in 2015:
IBIS: The main expected result at this point (media associations and rights holders role as change agents strengthened) is related to reduction of cases of ethical violation by the media houses (Public and Independent) and adherence to the Journalists Code of Conduct8. Another aspect is freedom of expression, press freedom and diversity and RTI guaranteed in law and adhered to by duty bearers in practice.
7 Through IBIS as IPO but for the benefit of all its PO´s, MoU´s were concluded with duty bearers like the provincial governments of Zambézia and Nampula; the municipalities of Quelimane, Mocuba and Alto-Molócuè (Zambézia); Nampula (Nampula province); Pemba (Cabo Delgado province); and, at large, with all the other municipalities through the National Municipalities Union (ANAM). 8 The one approved in 2011, as self-regulatory instrument, by the Mozambican Union of Journalists (SNJ), following a suggestion presented in a conference, during the same year, in Maputo, by the Swedish Press Ombudsman, highlighting the advantages of that (self-regulation), when compared to regulation from Government or Parliament.
14
A research funded by AGIR through AICE/IBIS Sub-programme on cases of ethical violations in the
media, was carried out in 2015 by CEC under its lead Communication´s Watch. The research found that
in general journalists and editors are aware of the standard ethical values/principles applicable to their
duties, but they end-up not materially adhering to them as a result of economic interests, with the
pursuit of profit being one of those cases. AGIR will take into account these issues in 2016 for advocacy
in order to mitigate/modify the status quo. Additionally, the World Journalism Index by Reporters
without Borders Report 2016 (but reporting the year 2015) reveals that Mozambique dropped two
degrees on the World Press Freedom. The country is now positioned 87 out of 180 countries in global
ranking.
To mitigate/modify the issues above, three public media houses (Radio Mozambique, TVM and ICS) and
three independent media houses (SOICO, Miramar and TIM) and 12 community radios from Gurue,
Maganja da Costa, Ile, Alto Molócué, Chinde, Namarroi, Nicoadala , Morrumbala, Namacurra and
Pebane were trained during2015 on Self-Regulation and Ethical Journalism. The training was carried out
by AICE Sub-programme. CEC and CAICC).
During an International Conference on Social Communication held in 2015, under the auspices of CEC
and SEKELEKANI, the media houses that attended the conference Televisão de Moçambique (TVM),
Radio Mozambique (RM), SOICO Media Group (STV, O País and SFM), Mira-Mar Television, Televisão
Independente de Moçambique (TIM), Instituto de Comunicação Social (ICS), which owns some of local
radio stations] made a commitment to change the current scenario. In a corporate way, for example,
MISA-Mozambique compromised itself to develop, in 2016, in partnership with the Mozambican Union
of Journalists (SNJ), efforts aimed at improving the 2011 Mozambican Journalists Code of Conduct, and,
thus, safeguard the watchdog role of the media.
In what refers to freedom of expression and press freedom, the 2015 World Press Freedom Index by
Reporters Without Borders (released in the first quarter of 2016) reveals that Mozambique dropped two
positions on the world press freedom, which is (according to the same source) due to self-censorship
and assassination of a journalist in 2015. Now, Mozambique is in position 87 out of 180 countries. The
legal environment as such did have a positive change, thanks to the approval of the RTI by-law.
Theme 5: Right to Political Representation and Participation
In this AGIR Theme, two of the four AGIR IPO´s (IBIS and Diakonia) are active: IBIS: LO 2 and Diakonia: LO
2.
Notes on Progress in 2015:
Diakonia: One of the expected outcomes within this theme is: “The process and results of the elections are transparent, reliable, complying with international electoral standards (e.g. SADC electoral principles and guidelines and IDEA)”.
15
This expected long term outcome is still to be realized. Next elections are expected to happen only in 2018. Meanwhile, the Electoral Observatory has started, in 2015, a consultation work towards the development of position paper and political/legislative proposal for the review of the electoral framework and addition of new contributions from civil society in order to, at bridging outcome level, contribute to a reform, on the present framework, that would make sure that “a broadly accepted (legal and institutional) electoral framework, by the main political actors (political parties and civil society organizations) has been established. The Public policy development process is politically and socially inclusive and participatory; There is some openness from government institutions for the participation and engagement of civil society organizations on the services delivering (e.g. education, health, SRHR) public policy development and implementation process. This participation tends to be institutionalized in consultative and participations forums such as:
✓ CNAC (National Council for the Advance of Child Rights) phased out in 2015 and substituted by a broader council- CNAS;
✓ Development Observatories.
The new participatory mechanism reported to 2015 was: ✓ CNAS (National Council of Social Action) has been established in 2015 and is an aggregation of
different councils (child advancement council, women advancement council, elderly advancement council etc.). Partner CSO´s working on child rights (ACAMO, Rede da Criança and Rede came) do claim that the decision of merging all these councils in one was not participative and reduced the number of representation of civil society organization in the consultative forum. To exemplify, Rede da Criança reported that in CNAS child rights organizations used to be represented by 7 organizations but in the CNAS framework the number has been cut to only two representations. The reported change was decided in the Council of Ministers based on the cost-efficiency argument that there were many different Councils dealing with different vulnerable groups within the same Ministry (CNAM- Conselho Nacional do Avanço da Mulher, Conselho Nacional do Avanço da Criança and the one dealing with elderly and disabled).
There are positive reports from partners indicating “duty bearers have included rights holder’s claims and concerns regarding inclusive access to justice, political participation, education, health, SRHR, social services, into the policy and governance agenda”. Some evidences are given in the annex matrix and in the text above regarding new policy and legal frameworks in debate or approved by the parliaments such as:
✓ The approval of national strategy against premature marriages; ✓ The debate on inclusive and rehabilitative education for people with disabilities.
IBIS: Regarding the right for political representation and participation, IBIS found that 2015 was
essentially a period to create the conditions to provide the members of parliament at various levels
(national, provincial and municipal), as well as civil society organizations, with solid knowledge regarding
the Right to Information Law. Therefore, in order to achieve that objective, the main activities carried
out were the training on the content of the RTIL and how can citizens and parliamentarians use it as a
16
mean to foster political participation was one of the key activities in 2015. The trainings were mainly
undertaken by AICE Sub-programme partners (ACDH, GDI, OAM, SEKELEKANI and Solidariedade
Moçambique). As these actions are still in an initial stage, it is expected that during 2016, members of
the assemblies at the various levels will use the knowledge gained to develop more informed
interventions, using as support the RTIL.
17
Notes on ‘Right to Accessible and Affordable SRH Public Service of Good Quality’1 Government actions for an improved service delivering of, an inclusive (women and men, young and adults), sexual and reproductive health care have improved. Regarding government improved actions, taken for a better and inclusive SRH service delivery in 2015, the
main changes reported were at policy and legislation levels1. New strategies and policies were put in place as reported above. No substantial evidences were found/reported indicating any meaningful change on governmental performance to better deliver services at different levels (province, district). “Improved and inclusive SRH service delivering has been placed in the priority of the public policy agenda on health services delivering”. The new approved strategy for family planning with a reference method on women and girls at the community and sanitary units represents a sign that inclusion of women and girls at the community level in regard to SRH service is being put in the public policy priority. This strategy
implies the allocation of more resources to SRH at the communities’ levels. “Government performance (national and provincial levels) in protecting and promoting people’s (vulnerable
children, women, disabled people and those living with HIV and AIDS) right to sexual and reproductive
health has improved”. The Government continued implementing the integrated protocol for assistance of
women and girls who have been victims of sexual harassment and domestic violence. The implementation
is being done under the “Multissectorial Mechanism for Integrated Assistance for Women, Victim of
Violence and the referring Manual. This has been a reference documents used by partners (MULEIDE,
AMMC) when assisting women seeking for assistance for having been effective or potential victims of
violence (MULEIDE is running a host house for women victims of domestic violence in Manhiça, Maputo).
In 2015, the implementation of the protocol has been done in partnership with CSO´s (Among them
MULEIDE, AMMCJ, and the main outcome was the provision of capacity building trainings to the technical
personnel from the health sector. The focus of the trainings was on the functionality of the mentioned
protocol. With reference to the Provincial Health Department in Niassa, 2015, the implementation of the
protocol has also resulted in the expansion of health technicians providing psychiatric assistance to the
victims of sexual harassment and violence in that province.
Two relevant policy change occurred with the partners contribution: PENIV (HIV and AIDS National
Strategy), that include provision on better and quality SRHR services and the National Strategy for
Prevention from and Fight Against Early Marriage. Regarding the promotion of human rights of sexual
minorities in Mozambique, the Ministry of Health included specific needs for sexual minorities in the list of
essential drugs and medical consumables, which are also distributed by the Health Sector Supply Chain to
national, provincial and district health facilities. The production and realization of the campaign "Different
but Equal" had an ever expected repercussion as very high levels of membership were achieved over the
year in every corner of the country. The campaign was disseminated in various media, with a greater focus
on radio, television and the internet. This was used as support to promote greater interaction between
LGBT organizations, the community and the general public that is interested in the cause of Lambda, thus
allowing more people to be involved in the campaign.
Regarding the promotion of SRHR among citizens, one of the AICE Sub-programme PO´s (GDI) sent about
375.000 SMS´s to citizens located in Nampula city and Nacala-Porto. The objective was to increase
awareness on issues like the conditions under which abortion is permitted by law. Though not linked with
SRHR, this partner used this campaign to alert citizens that the worker is not obliged to inform his HIV
status and on the importance of respecting fundamental rights (life in this case) and avoiding the
discrimination/trafficking of albinos.
CACHA
18
5. GOOD DONORSHIP PRINCIPLES This section contains notes on how AGIR IPO´s applied the good donorship principles in 2015, based on
the two most recent and relevant aid effectiveness instruments, namely The Busan Partnership for
Effective Development Cooperation (2011) and Istanbul CSO Development Effectiveness Principles
(2010), both held as references in the Embassy of Sweden Operational Guidelines for Partnering with
and Supporting Civil Society in Mozambique. All the actions are based in the HRBA (Human Rights
Based Approach).
As per The Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, four shared principles are meant
to guide the work of AGIR, namely (i) ownership, (ii) focus on results; (iii) partnerships; and (iv)
transparency and shared responsibility. In what refers to 2015, AGIR worked in line with those good
donorship values is synthetized in the following lines:
Ownership: In 2015, AGIR IPO´s did renew Partnership Agreements with almost all PO´s (exceptions:
Magariro, CEMO and CESAB) which transited from AGIR I to AGIR II based on their own core-business
and priorities, as per their statutes, strategic plan and policies. The same applied to those which joined
AGIR for the first time in 2015 (Solidariedade Moçambique, Gender Links, etc.). The PO´s of AGIR are
funded, as a generally rule, via the core-funding modality. In some cases (CODD, AMCS, MISA-
Mozambique, AWEPA, CEDE), where PO´s still face some organizational and/or internal governance
challenges, funding may be year-marked, but towards core-funding modality, which is the main funding
approach of AGIR. For PO´s which are not core PO´s of AGIR, but which can contribute to achievement of
results, another funding windows, concretely small/nursery funds does exist.
Focus on Results: AGIR IPO´s did agree, with all their PO´s, to focus their intervention on results, not on
activities or mere objectives. In all the monitoring visits undertaken by IPO´s in 2015, the issue of results
documentation and monitoring was always part of the discussions. So, Results Based Management
(RBM) is ab initio agreed by the parts. AGIR IPO´s provide trainings, in various forms (classic ones, tailor-
made and/or in the job training), which do also cover the RBM. Challenges are still there, as some PO´s
are demonstrating weaknesses in migrating from management by activities to RBM, but 2015 PO´s
reports showed an overall progress in working with RBM.
Partnerships [for Developments]: For the achievement of expected results, AGIR establishes
partnerships with Mozambican CSO´s/PO´s, as collective change agents targeting, in their interventions,
individual change agents or rights-holders. Considering that development relies on various actors, AGIR
also works with relevant duty bearers (parliaments and government departments, for example), with
which it firms strategic partnerships (Memorandums of Understanding). Table on joint activities
specifically list some examples of this partnerships. In the partnerships, AGIR does place particular
respect to the principle of equality (donors or their representatives and/or intermediaries and PO´s have
to have horizontal relations), to the principle of mutual accountability (AGIR reports to its PO´s and this
also report to AGIR), to the principle of predictability (via the establishment of multi-annual partnership
19
agreements), except (for the latter principle) in the situation in which their organizational and/or
internal issues to sort out.
Transparency and Shared Responsibility: The principle of transparency is agreed, by AGIR IPO´s and
implementing partners (PO´s), to be an omnipresent reality, meaning that every action within the
partnership has to have transparency as part of it. For example, the IPO´s did share with the PO´s all the
relevant programmatic information (programme document/proposals, detailed budgets, baselines, anti-
corruption policies, gender policies, etc.), as to allow an unrestricted access to information related to
AGIR9. During the partnership, all the parts share responsibilities, even in the cases in which a given
partner fails to achieve the desired results. Permanent and systematic accompaniment of this is made
possible via monitoring and evaluation exercises.
To keep impetus on the aid development agenda, as one of the recommendations of the Paris
Declaration (2005) and Accra Agenda for Action (2008) assessment in 2011, in 2015 AGIR interventions,
through local PO´s, did consider, as widely as possible:
▪ The use of results frameworks, which means that every operational plan established is supposed
to be based in a matrix in which different levels of results are presented (outputs, outcomes and
impacts), with an clear baseline, indicators (qualitative and/or quantitative), plus means of
verification, as to enable change measurement;
▪ Untie aid is adhered to by AGIR as much as possible, but, considering that there are still
significant challenges when it comes to funds channeled for activities [attained to results] and
those channeled to administration (salaries included), a 30-70 rule (30% of funds for
administration and 70% for activities, including, in the latter, 15% for capacity development via
the PO per se) was introduced in 2015, mostly based in the lessons learnt from AGIR I (2010-
2014).
As said in the introduction to this section, all the actions and interventions are drafted and implemented
rigorously inspired in the Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA), mainly on its five core principles,
namely participation; accountability; empowerment of rights-holders; legality of rights; and non-
discrimination and equality, the latter being strategically privileged, given the historically disadvantage
that women, girls, LGBT and other marginalized groups do experiment in Mozambique.
To ensure that partners understand in the same way what HRBA entails in the AGIR context, AGIR IPO´s
considered, in various ways, the matter with PO´s: that included bilateral talks, mainly during monitoring
visits; tailor-made trainings; discussions within the annual meetings between the IPO´s and PO´s; classic
trainings to PO´s on the matter (AICE Sub-programme, for example), etc. As to showcase what in
particular AGIR achieved in 2015 in what refers to the HRBA principle of non-discrimination and quality,
below are provided notes on mainstreaming of gender, HIV and AIDS and climate change:
9 The establishment of website (for AGIR) was also planned for 2015, as part of the transparency promotion, but that ended-up being delayed. Once finished, in 2016, all the programmatic information (including programmatic and audit report) will be published, for access by everyone).
20
For 2015, the joint activities planned in the area of gender and HIV/AIDS were: (i) health fair; (ii) training
in gender and HIV/AIDS; (iii) gender group technical meetings; and (iv) training on the fair resources
allocation system (FRAS). Those main joint activities were performed as below:
The health fair took place in Quelimane, following AGIR partner´s forum which allowed the participation
of AGIR partners as well as local CBO´s and the citizens of Quelimane. The objective was promoting
styles of sexual life and reproductive health for women and men and sexual minorities .The main
activities that took place in the fair were a march which started at Valentine Garden until Chirangano
field, where gymnastics activities took pace. During the fair, about 280 people benefited from blood
pressure tests, 78 people made HIV testing, 98 women benefited from different contraceptives for
family planning, and 80 people benefited from oral health education. All the participants on the fair
(approximately 600) were exposed to materials related to sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR)
and domestic violence. Three plays on matters related with SRHR were performed by children from the
local Primary School that works with AGIR PO´s. 2016 AGIR PO´s Forum will associate this fair to other
events which aim at strengthening active citizenship of citizens taking into account the rights and duties.
This fair will have the participation of other public institutions like Ministério da Administraçãoo Estatal
e Função Pública, Autoridade Tributária, etc.
Training in gender and HIV has not been implemented in accordance with the previously established for
two main reasons: i) the late implementation of joint activities as a result of the late start of
implementation of AGIR II. The closure of AGIR I have proven to be slower than envisioned. Therefore,
the four IPO´s decided not to carry out common trainings and alternatively they provided “tailor-made
training” to partners, specific attention was given to the new AGIR partners.
The Organization of training on the Fair Resources Allocation System was coordinated by We Effect,
since their regional office has experience in implementing this model. The training itself has not yet
taken place but We Effect held a preparatory meeting attended by programme and finance officers of
the four IPOs where they discussed the concept and operationalization of the FRAS methodology. Due to
the agenda of We Effect regional staff, this activity was postponed to the first quarter of 2016.
Gender group technical meetings took place as planned (one per trimester) and they were an important
moment for experience sharing among AGIR partners and delimitation of new strategies to improve
IPO´s role on helping PO´s mainstream gender.
The outputs of the activities carried out are: Some AGIR partners showed proof of understand gender
mainstreaming and improved their capacity of undertaking gender analysis in their strategic (ACDH and
OAM) and operational documents (ACDH, GDI, OAM, SEKELEKANI); partners developed draft gender
policies and action plans that were approved on their general assemblies; Some PO´s (OAM and
Solidariedade Moçambique)developed draft policies that are still to be submitted to their members
(Annual Generals Meetings), to be discussed and, most probably, to be approved.
Main challenges faced in 2015 were: (i) the continuous staff mobility within the partners and the
precarious knowledge management systems among their organizations lead to a situation where the
IPO´s need to be constantly training on the same issues; (ii) Despite the effort that has been made in
21
terms of bringing the executive staff and social organs to gender trainings, in some organizations still
there is disparity on what regards their attendance to the trainings and their commitment to gender
equality. Gender mainstreaming continues to be an issue that is taken care by executives of the PO´s;
(iii) In some cases, PO´s efforts to mainstreaming gender into their programs and organizational culture
still remain a matter of compliance to a donor requirement than a commitment with gender equality
and women’ rights (e.g. CODD). To tackle this identified challenge, in 2016, more emphasis will be
placed in usage of methodologies (GAL) that value increasing individual awareness and commitment to
gender equality and women’ rights as an important factor to achieve sustainable and lasting change in
PO´s organization culture and programming.
6. FINANCIAL REPORT [NOTES AND EXPLANATIONS]
a. Financial Performance
In 2015 AGIR donnors have disbursed around SEK 202,530,032.11 to IPO´s. The expenditures incurred in
the same period were SEK 149,591,983.84, which represents 74% of the total disbursed funds. The final
balance to be forwarded to 2016 were SEK 52,938,048, or 26% of the disbursed funds.
The total budget approved from AGIR donnors for the 4 IPO´s in 2015 were SEK 180,528,422. The total
funds available were SEK 202.530.032 which represent 112% of the approved budget . The reason why
the available funds were higher compared to the approved funds is because OXFAM has put own funds
into AGIR Programme.
b. Expenditure Structure
The structure of the expenditure shows that the total funds transfered to local organizations represent
75% of the total expenditure incurred in 2015, where 72% of funds were disbursed to PO´s and 3% of
funds were used in Other Mechanisms of Funding budget line.
The budgetline linked to tehcnical support to PO´s, IPO Lead Activities and Monitoring&Evaluation,
represents 4% of total expenditures of 2015.
The budgetline related to managament of the Programme, Programme Support Costs, Flat Rate for
Indirect Costs e Programme Staff Costs, represents 20% of total expenditures of 2015. So 80% of
expenditures of 2015 were allocated to PO´s and local organizations as funds transferred and tecnhical
support services delivered.
22
Funds Transfer to Partners,
112,450,611, 75%
IPO Lead Activities, 4,016,424.60, 3%
AGIR Joint Activities,
1,214,319, 1%
Monitoring and Evaluation ,
2,107,230, 1%
Programme Staff Costs, 13,304,945,
9% Programme Support Costs, 5,642,532,
4%
Flat Rate for Indirect Costs ,
10,855,922.75, 7%
c. Budget Performance
AGIR Programme has met the target fixed for 2015 since 90% of funds planned to PO´s were transferred.
The execution on Other Mechanisms of Funding budgetline were 28% of planned funds. The low level of
performance in this budgetline was due to the procceess of advertisement, evaluation and selection of
proposals being longer.
The performance on the budgetline related to IPO´s Lead Activities and Monitoring and Evaluation was
respectively 59% and 56% of the planned funds. The reasons that explain this low level of performance
are linked to AGIR I (2010 - 2014) phasing out and the needed arrangements to start implementing AGIR
II (2015-2020).
We need to pay a particular attention to Programme Support Costs budgetline where the execution was
106%. Well that shows that some IPO´s still need to address adjustmens on their costs structure,
specially on office costs.
Description Budget Expenditure %
(1) (2) (3)=(2) / (1)
Funds Transfer to Key Partners 119,625,109 107,800,079 90%
Other Mechanisms of Funding 16,421,550 4,650,531 28%
IPO Lead Activities 6,802,946 4,016,425 59%
AGIR Joint Activities 2,785,160 1,214,319 44%
Monitoring and Evaluation 3,760,019 2,107,230 56%
Programme Team Costs 14,331,757 13,304,945 93%
23
Programme Support Costs 5,299,415 5,642,532 106%
Flat Rate for Indirect Costs 11,502,467 10,855,923 94%
Total 180,528,422 149,591,984 83%
7. CONCLUSIONS AND CHALLENGES
7.1 Conclusions Being this the first year of implementation of AGIR II and also due to a short programme
inception period, 2015 performance has suffered many constraints that impacted in the ability
to fulfill some of the set targets (outputs). Nevertheless, what was accomplished will contribute
to bring about the changes that AGIR Programme pursues.
7.2 Challenges • The ongoing armed conflict has contributed to shrinking of civil space work in the country,
mainly as a result of increasing lack of trust in political arena. The once earned collaboration and
space by CSO´s was greatly reduced due to political and military clashes between Government
and Renamo as Government institutions became even more suspicious of CSO’s actions,
especially advocacy-related ones. The conflict also affected the extent to which partners were
able to fulfill their work plans as some PO´s are based/or have activities in province directly hit
by the conflict;
• The devaluation of the local currency (Meticais) vis-a-vis USD has affected initial agreed budgets
and the recent information that has been shared by Government indicates that the devaluation
can continue;
• There is still high partners´ dependence on AGIR funding. More information on partners
dependency on AGIR funding can be seen in annex 1;
• Deficient access to information (mostly from key sectors) limited collection and collation of
relevant data for the programme planning and reporting;
• The delay in establishment of a joint capacity building technical group affected realization of
joint activities.
24
8. ANNEXES:
8.1. Financial Report
AGIR - ACÇÕES PARA UMA GOVERNAÇÃO INCLUSIVA E RESPONSÁVEL
Consolidated Income and Expenditure Statement
Period: January – December
Year: 2015
Currency: SEK
DESCRIPTION 2015 %
1. Funds Received 202,530,032.11
1.1 Diakonia 54,617,400.00
1.2 IBIS-Moçambique 40,000,000.00
1.3 Oxfam Novib 76,265,632.11
1.4 We Effect 31,647,000.00
2. Effective Expenditures (January - December 2015) 149,591,983.84
74%
2.1 Diakonia 33,871,163.00 17%
2.2 IBIS-Moçambique 28,688,518.35 14%
2.3 Oxfam Novib 65,315,808.26 32%
2.4 We Effect 21,716,494.23 11%
3. Excess of receipt under expenditures (1-2) 52,938,048 26%
3.1 Diakonia 20,746,237.00
3.2 IBIS-Moçambique 11,311,481.65
3.3 Oxfam Novib 10,949,823.85
3.4 We Effect 9,930,505.77
25
AGIR - ACÇÕES PARA UMA GOVERNAÇÃO INCLUSIVA E RESPONSÁVEL
CURRENCY: SEK
PERIOD: January - December 2015
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET MONITORING
Category DESCRIPTION Budget Diakonia IBIS OXFAM WE EFFECT TOTAL Balance % Notes
Funds Transfer to Partners
KEY PARTNERS
KEY PARTNERS 119,625,109 20,137,483 18,866,989
52,717,344 16,078,262 107,800,079
11,825,030 90%
SUB - TOTAL OF KEY PARTNERS 119,625,109 20,137,483 18,866,989
52,717,344 16,078,262 107,800,079
11,825,030 90%
OTHER MECHANISM OF FUNDING
c) Small Funding 9,078,091 2,017,809 414,665 - 660,763 3,093,237 5,984,854 34%
d) Innovative Funding 4,150,908 - 577,996 - - 577,996 3,572,912 14%
e) Agile Funding 3,192,551 - 970,348 - 8,951 979,299 2,213,253 31%
SUB-TOTAL- OTHER MECHANISM OF FUNDING
16,421,550 2,017,809 1,963,008 - 669,714 4,650,531 11,771,018 28%
TOTAL KEY PARTNERS PLUS OTHER MECHANISM FUNDING
136,046,659 22,155,292 20,829,998
52,717,344 16,747,976 112,450,611
23,596,048 83%
IPO Lead Activities
Other Programme Costs
Base-line Study 966,445 449,131 202,928 210,195 862,254 104,191 89%
Civil Society Study and Surveys 515,575 - 437,547 14,520 452,067 63,508 88%
Midterm evaluation - - - - - -
Partners assessment 510,812 7,500 116,306 2,054 125,861 384,952 25%
Capacity building programmes 3,582,253 123,939 170,664 1,452,148 9,453 1,756,205 1,826,048 49%
Thematic training 894,408 125,470 438,488 1,784 565,742 328,665 63%
Programme communications 210,503 47,800 116,827 21,727 18,219 204,572 5,931 97% N1
Coordination and networking activities 122,950 34,150 15,573 - 49,723 73,227 40%
Sub-total Other programme costs 6,802,946 338,859 1,306,990 2,118,189 252,387 4,016,425 2,786,521 59%
26
AGIR Joint Programme Costs
AGIR Joint Activities
Template Design 20,662 - - - 20,662 0%
Joint Capacity Building 398,470 600 57,760 38,435 96,794 301,676 24%
Partner Satisfaction Test 276,336 - - - - 276,336 0%
Consultative Forum 257,992 427,716 51,714 374,632 854,061 (596,069) 331% N2
Communication and newsletter printing 388,215 33,750 94,654 61,206 7,543 197,153 191,062 51%
Joint Studies 478,469 - 60,790 60,790 417,679 13%
Joint MEAL specialist 376,826 - - - 376,826 0%
Joint communication specialist 376,826 - - - 376,826 0%
Seminaries Workshops and exchange visits 170,774 - 3,532 1,988 5,520 165,254 3%
Laptops and furniture for specialists 40,589 - - - 40,589 0%
Sub-total Joint programme costs 2,785,160 462,066 204,127 538,595 9,531 1,214,319 1,570,841 44%
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation costs
Programme Audit 823,756 118,741 - 474,065 192,888 785,694 38,062 95%
Partner Forum and M and E partner workshops
1,114,992 57,560 157,059 228,559 328,139 771,317 343,676 69%
Critical friends 332,068 10,019 - - 10,019 322,049 3%
Partner satisfaction Survey 254,425 5,400 - - 5,400 249,025 2%
National travel 974,607 31,495 102,131 201,351 65,988 400,965 573,642 41%
International travel 154,758 60,000 56,102 - 17,733 133,835 20,923 86%
Head office program coordination 91,187 - - - 91,187 0%
Head office controller support 14,225 - - - 14,225 0%
Sub-total Monitoring and Evaluation 3,760,019 283,215 315,292 903,975 604,748 2,107,230 1,652,789 56%
TOTAL IPO ACTIVITY, JOINT ACTIVITY AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION
13,348,125 1,084,140 1,826,410 3,560,758 866,666 7,337,974 6,010,151 55%
Mozambique Programme Team Costs
PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT AND STAFF COST
Personnel Costs 14,331,757 5,564,088 2,513,374 3,506,273 1,721,210 13,304,945 1,026,812 93%
Sub-total personnel costs 14,331,757 5,564,088 2,513,374 3,506,273 1,721,210 13,304,945 1,026,812 93%
Programme Programme Support Costs
27
Support Costs Equipment 1,700,624 177,150 666,050 785,495 35,642 1,664,337 36,287 98%
Country Office Operational Costs 3,598,791 1,257,802 978,677 817,421 924,295 3,978,195 (379,404) 111% N3
Sub-total programme support 5,299,415 1,434,952 1,644,726 1,602,917 959,937 5,642,532 (343,118) 106%
TOTAL PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT AND STAFF COSTS
19,631,172 6,999,040 4,158,101 5,109,189 2,681,147 18,947,477 683,695 97%
TOTAL PROGRAMME COSTS 169,025,956 30,238,472 26,814,508
61,387,292 20,295,789 138,736,061
30,289,894 82%
7% of flat Rate for Indirect Costs 11,502,467 3,632,691 1,874,010 3,928,516 1,420,705 10,855,923 9,628,457 94%
GRAND TOTAL 180,528,422 33,871,163 28,688,518
65,315,808 21,716,494 149,591,984
39,918,351 83%
Notes
N1- Expenses were higher compared to funds budgeted.
N2- Expenses were higher because the venue for the Consultative Forum was changed from Maputo to Quelimane.
N3 - IPOs still have challenge to manage cost operational office.
28
8.2. RISK ANALYSIS Internal risk analysis for each IPO, will figure in the individual reports of each IPO. This report merely wants to point out the most relevant external risks in
relation to implementation of the AGIR Programme. The context is not static; other economic and environmental aspects in the risk analysis matrix were
included. These aspects were identified as New Risks Identified
External Risks to implementation of AGIR Programme in Mozambique (Domestic political context)
Risk Risk level10: High, Medium, low.
Mitigation
Socio – Economic- New Risk Identified
After years of a fast growing economy, especially related to the expansion in developments related to the extractive industry, it is now clear that growth expectations were not very much realistic. Not only are taxes and income from this industrial development much lower than expected; even more so because the state is indebted beyond sustainability, through megaprojects such as Ematum and Proindico – indirectly financing military investments. The state has further contracted more debts (kept as secret) during the last 5 years of the former presidential period. The current debt level is considered unsustainable and will have a direct impact on the state’s ability to finance its budget, as well as its ability to comply with its other financial obligations such as international debt repayments (including bonds). This in conjunction with major donors’ decision to stop financing of the Mozambique state budget will lead to big financial gaps with less funds available for social sectors such as health and education. Space for CSO´s to monitor budgets might become even more restricted/less transparent.
Likelihood high Impact high
For AGIR IPO´s to closely monitor developments and actions/reactions of the GOM in managing the debt crisis. Ensure use of available spaces (even if decreasing) to improve transparency and financing of basic social services. Strengthen links with international advocacy and lobby institutions to insure support for advocacy and access to information in-country. Support PO´s in their support to populations’ organizations for better livelihoods.
Governo de Moçambique, Junho 2015, Mecanismo Multisectorial de Atendimento Integrado a Mulher Vitima de violência; Ministerio da Saude manual Para Atendimendo Integrado as Vitimas de Violencia , Junho, 2015
29
Prices of basic goods have risen more than 50%, leaving the populations ability to maintain a normal livelihood impossible. In this setting, public services, such as health and education are neglected by state support, whilst privatization in the sector is rife – creating a situation where most people cannot afford to access quality services in this sector.
Non-inclusive growth, increasing the gap between the poor and rich.
Focus on interaction with government institutions at different levels to improve understanding of impact of corruption. Ensure information flow to CSO`s and citizens in order to organize constructive interactions with government at all levels
Increased corruption (Mozambique is now amongst the top 10 most corrupt countries in Africa according to TI’s Global Corruption Barometer 2014).
Political -
1. Increased military conflict Lack of inclusive political environment leads to instability in the country. The war against the opposition’s armed forces is devastating vast regions in the central area of the country – producing refugees in neighboring countries (Malawi and Zimbabwe).
Likelihood is high Impact is high
IPO´s to monitor closely on security situation, together with partners, to ensure safety of personnel and beneficiaries at all times. (security plan) IPO´s to adapt planning according to accessibility of Partners/ geographical areas of intervention – in coordination with EoS.
The internal power struggle in FRELIMO is leading to a kind of dual state situation. Even with the current President being the party president, there is no change in political course – there is an increasingly militarization.
Likelihood is high Impact is high
30
Lack of separation of power between the State and the ruling party FRELIMO.
Likelihood is high Impact is high
Lack of implementation of the Peace Accords of 1992 and 2014. Resulting in military actions in the central area of country.
Likelihood high Impact to high
Democratic rule of law under pressure (e.g. freedom of expression, press freedom and political participation). Opposition members are systematically murdered by “unknown” groups. Outspoken personalities ( also from civil society and partners of IBIS) are threatened and intimidated in leaving the country
Likelihood high Impact high
Close monitoring by all IPOs, jointly with the (I)NGO and Donor community to ensure safety of POs, staff and beneficiaries at all times. Periodical analysis on situation and adaptation of security plans.
A general decrease in the space for civil society, as well as a co-option of civil society and academics by the dominant party in power.
Likelihood high Impact high
Close monitoring and analysis – followed by adaptation plans where possible – in coordination with EoS
A general decrease in tolerance of INGO´s, especially when focusing on development of civil society. (non-issuing of work permits for ex-pats) This has resulted in INGO´s leaving the country.
Likelihood High Impact High
2. Co-option of civil society by government and/or industry
In a context of decrease of donors that support CSO´s, the political or extractive industry company interference in the CSO´s can influence the quality of their work.
Likelihood High Impact High
What IPO´s did in 2015 is a Improving internal democratic structures. Ensured that all social organs are engaged in the organization
3. New legislation which severely limits the operations and financing of CSO activities and INGO´s
Likelihood High Impact High
The interventions of the CSO´s in the political and economic context have proven effective which fears that freedoms are limited. All CSO´s in Mozambique are financially dependent on what makes them very fragile
Since AGIR I IPO´s have been developing actions with the PO´s in order to improve their communication strategies with all stakeholders.
Climate- New Risk Identified
31
Mozambique is one of the most vulnerable counties to climate change in southeast Africa, the effects of which risk undermining possible social and economic progress and achievements. Climate change impacts most severely the poorest and highly vulnerable groups of people and makes it more difficult to break the cycle of poverty. 2015 saw floods in central Mozambique ate the beginning of the year, whilst in the southern part a widespread drought continued into 2016 – affecting 900.000 people by march 2016. (Estimated 1.500.000 people affected by October 2016). Government declared temporary red alert late in the process (over 900.000 people affected).
Likelihood is high Impact is low
When disaster impacts on accessibility for POs/IPOs to reach planned areas of intervention, plans will be adjusted to ensure the maximum realization of original planned support. ( risk of higher costs – to be negotiated and adapted with EoS)
Currently Mozambique is experiencing the effects of “El Nino” (2015 – 2016) – with extreme drought in most of southern regions and parts of the central region. It is expected that later 2016, the effects of ‘La Nina” will start, resulting in extreme weather conditions of excessive rains and cyclones.
32
8.3. OVERARCHING RESULTS FRAMEWORK
Objectively verifiable
indicators
Baseline
(Jan 2015)
Target Means of
verification
Status by End of 2015
Mid-term
(Dec 2017)
End-line
(Dec
2020)
Impact: A Mozambican society
where its citizens,
particularly also women
and other presently
marginalized groups, fully
enjoy their rights to social
inclusion and gender
equity, to retribution of
wealth created from the
country’s patrimony, to
accessible and
affordable public services
of good quality, to basic
civil freedoms and to
political representation
and participation; in a
peaceful and
ecologically sustainable
environment
Increase in gender
development index,
above the SADC
countries’ average
(Benchmark) +3% +10% UN Human
Development
report
Increase in social
institutions and gender
index, above the SADC
countries’ average
(Benchmark) +3% +10% SIGI report
Increase in social
institutions and gender
index, above the SADC
countries’ average
(Benchmark) +2% +5% Afrobarometer,
World Values
Surveys,
Minorities at Risk
reports
Coverage of strategic
poverty reduction and key
public services operational
budget from tax revenues
TBD 40% 95% State Budget
Progress towards linearly
extrapolated (post-2015)
MDGs, above the SADC
countries’ average
(Benchmark) +5% +20% UN (Post-2015)
MDG progress
reports
33
Increase in human
freedom index, above the
SADC countries’ average
(Benchmark) +5% +15% Freedom
House’s
freedom reports
Increase in democracy
index, above the SADC
countries’ average
(Benchmark) +5% +15% Economist
Intelligence
Unit’s
democracy
index reports
Increase in Africa
governance index, above
the SADC countries’
average
(Benchmark) +5% +15% Mo Ibrahim
Foundation’s
Africa
governance
reports
Final
outcome:
The emergence of an
active, strong and vibrant
civil society in
Mozambique, who
legitimately raise and
channel the voice of the
female and male right
holders who are at
present being politically,
socially and
economically
marginalized, secure their
access to all information
they need to exercise
their civil rights, and
effectively participating
in and influencing the
course of policy decision-
making process and
accountability of the
% of CSO´s who score
positive on their
governance, social
legitimacy, management,
financial systems and
sustainability assessments
TBD 45% 95% AGIR
assessments
% of CSO´s whose
campaigns reach more
than 85% of their strategies
targets for two
consecutive years
TBD 20% 85% Campaign
evaluation
reports; Annual
reports of
partner
organizations
% of CSO´s whose
campaigns were designed
in direct and decisive
participation with (a
representation from) the
right holders (of the right
holders’ choice)
TBD 70% 100% Campaign
planning
reports; Annual
reports of
partner
organizations
34
duty bearers for a
transparent, democratic,
inclusive, gender just and
human rights sensitive
governance
% of CSO´s who are
regularly (at least once a
month) invited by duty
bearers to contribute to
relevant documents (e.g.
poverty reduction
strategies, sectorial annual
and strategic plans)
TBD 15% 50% Campaign
evaluation
reports; Annual
reports of
partner
organizations
Theme 1:
Goal for
Theme 1:
Right to Inclusion and Equality
A political ecosystem in which all the rights-holders (women, girls and other marginalized groups) are equally included in the socio-economic
development process is established and functioning
Long-term
outcomes:
Oxfam2a: Mainstream norms and
beliefs enable women to have equal
chances for social, economic and
political participation
% of Men and
Women that
shows positive
attitudes and
behaviors to
gender equality
in their daily lives
20%
40% 70% Gender norms
and attitudes
surveys
BL Research
N/A – Figures to be
confirmed through a MTR in
2018
# policies and
mechanisms
created by
initiative of duty
bearers to
promote gender
equality that are
duly
implemented
4 5 6 Annual Reports of
the PES (Plano
Económico
Social); State
Budget
Apart from the figures in the
baseline, there was also the
approval of the National
Strategy for Prevention of
Early Marriage which also
encompasses issues related
to promotion of gender
equality. Thus, quantitatively,
the cumulative figure is 5
(baseline+1). Qualitatively,
WLSA continued to work with
the Ministry of Gender, Child
and Social Action, Ministry of
Interior, Ministry of Health
(Health Training Centres),
Ministry of Justice (School of
35
Judges to be) and the
Attorney General to
promote gender equality.
Additionally, WLSA and
Forum Mulher led Women´s
National Conference to
reflect on women´s rights.
# relevant inter-
national
protocols and
mechanisms to
promote the
rights of women
ratified,
adopted,
adapted and
under implemen-
tation
2 2 3 National
Constitution;
Women specific
legislation; Sector
(Ministry of Health,
Ministry of Social
Action, Ministry of
Justice, Ministry of
Interior) Plans
No new relevant
international protocol
approved, but the MDG´s
have been changed into
Sustainable Development
Goals (SDG). Furthermore,
Fórum Mulher, WLSA and
WLSA participated in the
Commission for the Status of
Women which also discussed
issues related to gender
promotion.
Oxfam2b: Gender based violence is
prevented and victims of GBV are
effectively supported by government
structures
# of women that
have reported to
have suffered
from GBV
2225
4450 8900 GAMC reports The number of women that
have reported to have
suffered from gender based
violence increased in 5%,
from 15,628 in January 2015
to 16,372, in December 2015,
according to some partners’
(AMME, WLSA, FM, NAFEZA,
HOPEM, Lambda, PNDH,
Nweti) 2015 Annual Reports
36
% of women who
reported GBV
who are satisfied
by attendance
of police,
judiciary and
psycho-social
counselors
20%
45% 65% Satisfaction
surveys
GAMC
FM
WLSA
N/A – Figures to be
confirmed through the MTR
in 2018
WLSA continued to work with
the judiciary, Ministry of
Interior, Ministry of Health
and the Attorney General on
strategies to reduce gender
based violence.
Oxfam2c: The majority of women in
their reproductive age have free and
unrestricted access to adequate
sexual and reproductive health
services
% of women in
reproductive age
who feel free to
access SRH care
15%
25% 40% MISAU
WLSA
N/A – Figures to be
confirmed
through the MTR in 2018
N´weti continued to work
with the Ministry of Health
on promotion of SRHR
through a social and
behavior change
communication (TV and
Radio Programme - Tua
Cena). Additionally, AMME
and NAFEZA continued
awareness raising activities
to promote girls and
women´s access to SRHR.
# districts at
national level
providing SRHR
128 144 144 MISAU
Homepage;
MISAU 2014 PES
Review
128 districts provided SRHR
services
37
# of health units
in the country
that apply
humanization of
health services
initiatives
Information
not available.
+30% +65% MISAU
Homepage;
MISAU 2014 PES
Review
35 health units (27%)
implementing initiatives
aimed at humanizing health
services in 2015
Oxfam3: Duty-bearers and community
leaders display positive attitudes
towards the rights of LGBTI, PLWHA
and elderly people and their social
and political inclusion
% of duty bearers
and leaders
displaying
positive attitudes
towards rights of
LGTBI, PLWHA
and older people
LGBTI: 1%
PLWHA: 15%
Older: 40%
)
5%
30%
50%
15%
60%
60%
Attitude surveys
FTI, LAMBDA and
RENSIDA Reports
N/A – Figures to be
confirmed through the MTR
in 2018
Although there is no a formal
and legal approval of
Lambda, the Ministry of
Health introduced two
relevant reforms in 2015. First,
it started to provide drugs
and medical consumables
destined specifically to LGBT.
Second, the revised list of
essential drugs includes LGBT
specific needs. FTI and
PSCM-PS disseminated the
law on rights of older people.
The Ministry of Health and
the National AIDS Council,
approved, with contributions
from some partners
(Lambda, RENSIDA, N´weti
and Hopem), the National
Strategy on HIV and AIDS
(PENIV), including rights of
PLWHA.
38
# specific legal
frameworks
related to
promotion of
rights of
marginalized
groups (LGBTI,
PLWHA, and
older people)
2
(Law on
discrimination
against
PLWHA, law
on promotion
of the rights of
older people)
2 3 State Journal;
Shadow reports
Apart from the ones in the
baseline, 2 relevant
policies/legal frameworks
were approved: PENIV and
the Penal Code.
We2a: Civil society organizations and
rights holders successfully influence
formulation and implementation of
policies promoting equitable rural
growth and right to food
# of policies
strategies and
programmes
designed in
direct and
decisive
participation with
righters holders´
representatives
5 10 15 Policy papers,
strategies and
government
programmes,
Minutes, partners
reports
Although partners are
involved in processes related
to promoting equitable rural
growth and right to food,
there was less dynamic in
these areas: Two proposals
regarding i) the degree of
the Tax Regime Law for
cooperative enterprises and
regulation of the law of
modern Cooperatives were
submitted by AMPCM11 to
the government for
approval. Partners have also
been involved in the
consultation process of
elaboration of the Rural
Development Strategy. The
Final document is influenced
and contains the vision of
CSO´s about Rural
Development in the Country.
Two Multi- sectorial Plans for
the Reduction of Chronic
Malnutrition (PAMRDC), one
in Nampula and the other
11 AMPCM - Mozambican Association for promotion of modern Cooperatives
39
We2b: Civil society and rights holders
have improved their mobilization and
advocacy to promote policy change
on equitable rural growth and right to
food
one in Tete, were
elaborated, with
participation of AENA and
UPCT, together with
members of farmer’s district
unions. The plans were
approved and adopted by
provincial governments in
both Provinces. OMR have
been involved in the
elaboration of two
documents: The first to be
to be used as a reference
for formulation, by WFP, of
the strategy on food
security and nutrition in
Mozambique to be
submitted to the
government in 2016, the
second, supported by FAO,
The draft guidelines for the
Support of Family Agriculture
in the CPLP countries will be
discussed and Adopted by
The Presidents of the CPLP
countries in July 2016 in Brazil
# of dialogue
sessions with key
policy makers,
and duty bearers
to which CSO´s
are invited
24
35
50
Minutes, partners
reports
During 2015, partners
attended more than 7
dialogue sessions with
National and Provincial
governments, mostly the
agriculture sector’s and
Parliamentarians,
concerning: i) revision of
the Master Plan of and
consultation process
(rounds) the PROSAVANA;
40
ii) The increase of
agribusiness in the
Agriculture sector.
Additionally, meetings were
also undertaken for approval
of provincial Agriculture
reports and planed activities
for 2016.
Diakonia 3 - There is an increase of
public resources allocation for
improved universal access to key
public service (justice, education,
health, SRHR, and social service) by
the most vulnerable groups;
Proportion (%) of
budget
allocated to
each key service
area at national
level;
1-education-
19.8%
2- Health -
9.1%
3-SRH - N/A
4- Justice –
1.9%
5- social
service –3.5%
20%
9.55
N/A
-
-
22.8%
10.2%
N/A
2.0%
3.6%
-Analyze on the
annual budget
and state
account reports
In 2015 there was some
increase in the total budget
allocate at national level in
some social areas of interest
of the sub-programme.
About 63, 5% of the state
budget (3, 4 thousand million
dollars) was allocated to the
social and economic sectors
against 2.7 thousand million
dollars in 2014 (52, 7%)
representing an increase of
budget allocation to social
and economic sector of
about 10.8%. The education
sector has received 1248
million dollars, corresponding
to 22, 8% of the total budget
expenditure, against 1035
million dollars in 2014 (19, 8%
of the total budget). The
health sector has received
561, 5 million dollars (10, 2%
Ratio (in #) of
available senior
professional’s in
each area
(teachers/
medical doctors/
judges) at district
level;
1-education-
1 teacher/69
2- Health – 1
doctor for
30.000
inhabitants;
3-SRH - N/A14
1/60
1/27.000
N/A
1/95 mil
1/50
1/25m
1/90 mil
Sectorial Reports
(Education, Health
and Justice)
14 No updated figures found.
41
4- Justice – 1
judge/100.000
inhabitants;
5- social
service –
N/A
N/A
of the total budget),
representing an increase of
1, 1% against 477, 6 million
dollars in 2014, when the
expenditure attained 9, 1%12.
Regarding budget
allocation that would
contribute for more access
to justice and social
protection, the scenario from
the 2015 budget is described
below.
- Total budget (national
level) allocated for the
judicial system J3, 525.6
Meticais in (2014) equivalent
to 1.9% of the total budget.
In 2015, the budget
allocated 4,001.7 Meticais
equivalent to 2.0 % of the
total state budget. For social
protection and labour, the
proposition of state budget
allocated was 6,509.7
Meticais, equivalent to 3, 5%
of the total budget in 2014.
In 2015 there was an
% of resources
allocated for
gender,
disabled, poor’s
and aged
people inclusion;
Disaggregate
d data not
available;15
- - Annual report of
Gender, child and
Social actin
sector.
12 Orçamento do Estado de Moçambique cresce em 2015 para 6315 milhões de dólares, 2016, http://www.macauhub.com.mo/pt/category/noticias/, 22/03/16, 12:15:00 15 The aim is that by 2017 (2020) desegregated data is available as a result of partners’ advocacy.
42
increase of 0, 1% (3.55) in the
total State budget amount
allocated, equal to 7,087.5
Meticais. Although there was
a small increase, resource
allocations for the most
vulnerable groups remained
scarce13.
Considering that the most
vulnerable groups are more
concentrated at province
and district levels, the 2015
State budget has reduced
the percentage of budget
allocated centrally from 69%
to 59, 8% increase over the
provincial budget (from 17,
8% to 23, 2%), district (from
11, 8% to 23, 2%) and
municipalities (from 1, 4% to
1, 6%). This scenario meant
that there was more money
to be allocated to those
decentralised places.
13 Previsão das Despesas nas Áreas de Protecção Social de forma a prosseguir com a implementação da Estratégia de Protecção Social Básica que tem como objectivo mitigar o impacto do
custo de vida da população mais desfavorecida, está previsto o montante de 3.522,3 milhões de MT, onde o número de beneficiários passará dos 439.144 previstos em 2014 para cerca de
475.097, em 2015, um aumento nominal de 8,2%.
http://www.dno.gov.mz/docs/OE2015/Orcam_Cidadao%202015_Versao_Final.pdf, Maputo, 22/0372016, 12:44:00
43
Diakonia1a- A set of public policies,
regulations and laws creating an
enabling framework/ environment for
a broader social inclusion, of the
most vulnerable rights holders, have
been approved or reviewed by the
duty bearer’s at the parliament;
# of new or
revised policies,
regulations, laws
on key service
provision;
The
Constitutional
rights; and
Laws about
inclusive
education;
access to
health care
including
sexual
reproductive
health care;
access to
justice (Lei
17/2003) and
to social
protection of
vulnerable
people (Lei
4/2007,
Decree
85/2009 -
women,
infected by
HIV and AIDS,
elderly) and
to minors;
1; 2; 3;5 4; Partner’s reports/
Republics Bulletin
and gov, website;
On top of other existing
policy, legislative and
programmatic documents,
during 2015 new tools were
approved and entered in
force (national level), which
will improve the enabling
environment for change and
social inclusion;
✓ Approved the
National Strategy for
Prevention
premature marriage
in Mozambique
(December 2015) –
AMMCJ,
✓ Approved the new
National HIV and
AIDS response
Strategy (PEN V)16—
✓ Approved the
revised penal code
which has removed
ambiguous legal
aspects that
threatened the
realization of human
rights of the sexual
minorities and has
incorporated articles
16 Approved November 2015
44
that decriminalizes
the abortion –The
state budget 2015
indicating increase
in the social sectors
(health care and
education) –
Level (three
levels scale), of
gender and
vulnerable
groups
inclusiveness on
the new/revised
policy
frameworks;
Actual level of
data
disaggregatio
n (by gender/
vulnerable
groups) for
better
monitoring
and
accountability
demanding
was assessed,
by partners, to
be low;
Medium high Evaluation reports
/ qualitative
studies reports;
Target set to 2017 not
assessed in 2015 as it was
unlikely to change in the
initial yer of the programme;
Theme 2:
Goal for
Theme 2:
Right to Retribution of Wealth Created from the Country’s Patrimony
As a result of rights holders’s access to information, these claim for fair distribution of resources and duty bearers improve wealth retribution created from the country’s patrimony
45
Long-term
outcome:
Oxfam4: The extractive sector in
Mozambique is transparent,
accountable, and responsible (fiscally,
economically, environmentally and
socially) and contributes as a result
significantly to the socio-economic
development of the country
% infrastructure
investment costs
and recurrent
running costs for
basic services
covered by
revenues from
extractive
industries
Information
not
available.
35%
25%
75%
65%
State Budget Figures on the contribution of
the extractive industry
revenues to the State
Budget and re-enforcement
of infrastructure are not
available so far due to
resistance of some
government officials to
provide disaggregated data
on budget sources. Thus,
reporting on these figures will
be through a medium-term
review to be carried out in
2018
% state budget
deriving from
extractive
industries
Information
not
available.
20% 35% State Budget
% of mining
companies that
implement their
environmental
management
plans
50% 65% 80% Cadastro
Mineiro; MICOA
Report
46
IBIS1: Governmental duty bearers in
the EI show proof of taking
accountability vis-à-vis the access to
information law, including the respect
for it, while private sector duty bearers
take accountability by responding
positively to rights
safeguarding
1. % of national /
international
companies
holding
concessions in
extractive sector
who regularly
supply information
under EITI
31% 50- -100 EITI; INE; DNO
National statistics
on Poverty
In 71 projects selected to
provide information to the
EITI report, 15 didn’t reply,
which corresponds to 21%, of
which, 13 in mining project
and 2 in hydrocarbons
projects. The figure of those
who reacted positively
represents a percentage of
79%.
2. % of of EI
projects who
report tax under
EITI
84 100 100 According to the Extractive
Industry Transparency
Initiative (EITI) report, in 6th
biannual report (current and
recent included the fiscal
years 2013-2014, published in
December 2015, we can
see, in about 151 existing
extractive industry projects in
the mining area, 51 were
selected through the
materiality criterion or having
a contribution less than
500.000MT, representing 33%
of those which reported the
payment of tax. In what
refers to hydrocarbon
project, all of them (20) did
report their tax payment,
47
which represents 100%.
3. Ratio of
Expenditure for
Education and
Health / total
Revenue (in%)
34 40 50 Based on the EITI report, the
total of revenue coming
from extractive industries,
excluding capital gains, was
MZM 13.476.675.577,7. The
2015 PES report is not clear
on whether this revenue has
contributed to the
expenditure for education
and health sectors.
4. Contribution of
mega projects
(incl. EI) revenue
to total revenue
(in %)
6,7 10 20 The contribution of revenue
in 2015 according to the EITI
report (excluding capital
gains) to the state budget
was 3, 79%, which is lower
than the set target. Actually,
this is explained by the
reduction of commodities
prices in the international
market, mainly coal. So, the
initial expectations have
drastically changed.
48
5. Poverty Index
by target
Provinces
CD: 37.4
NA: 57.7
ZA: 70.5
TE: 42.0
CD: 31.8
NA: 49.0
ZA: 59.9
TE: 35.7
CD: 27.0
NA: 41.7
ZA: 54.9
TE: 30.0
Based on the Family Budged
Survey (IOF2014/15) the
poverty indexes in the areas
with natural resources
abundance, calculate by
household, is far from
achieving the target, for
instance in the AICE’s priority
provinces. In Cabo Delgado
the poverty index is 53%,
Nampula (36%) and Tete
(45%). We can see that
Nampula province is where
the poverty indexes
reduced. The reason for that
is still to be surveyed.
6. Ratio of
Employment
Index in industry /
average Business
Volume Index in in
EI and mining (in
%).
22 30 50 Based on the PES 2015
forecast, the extractive
industry sector should create
192,446 employments, but
according to the EITI data
(6th report), only 27,560 jobs
were created, which
corresponds to only 14% of
what had been forecast. The
percentage is lower when
compared to the target
which had been set (30%),
which can be explained by
the crisis in the price of
commodities (coal in
particular) in the
49
international market, plus the
delays in the establishment
of plants, especially in Cabo
Delgado.
7. Evidence that
at least 5% of
royalties from EI
are earmarked in
annual budget for
communities in
districts affected
by EI(Yes / No)
No
CD: N
NA: N
TE: N
CD: Y
NA: Y
TE: Y
CD: Y
NA: Y
TE: Y
Based on the EITI 6th report,
an amount of MZM 16.2
million generated from this
sector was transferred to the
state administrations of the
communities whereby
exploitations are being
undertaken, namely through
tax royalties (2,75%). Moatize
(in Tete) obtained MZM 8.6;
Moma (in Nampula) MZM 2.3
million. Cabo Delgado,
another priority province for
AICE, received nothing, to to
the non-start of the LNG
project (concretely in
Palma). The rest of the
above mentioned MZM 16.2
million for transferred to
other provinces with EI
projects (Inhambane, in
particular).
50
% 5) - -
51
We1a: Civil society organizations and
rights-holders successfully advocate
the respect for legal and customary
rights to land and natural resources
# of advocacy
processes and
events addressing
land and NR
designed in direct
and decisive
participation of
rights holders
representatives
131
150
200 Policy papers,
Open letters,
Media articles,
Minutes, Process
plans, Reports,
Radio and TV
debate/
programmes
All 13 Partners of the NACE
subprogram were more
dynamic demonstrating
engagement in promotion of
advocacy and lobby on
land and natural resources
with significant results. More
than 30 processes, of which
7 position papers, 15
seminaries and workshops, 8
demonstrations were carried
out with involvement of right
holders. This was among
others due to the maturation
of ongoing processes (e.g.
the campaign “Nao ao
Prosavana), Palma case in
Pemba, Vale, Jindal and
ICLV cases in Tete, Kenmare
in Nampula and other
mining investments, forestry
and land process in all
provinces; that resulted in
positive decisions and
measures taken by the
Government (e.g. The
launch by MITADER of the
Project “Terra Segura” where
5 million DUAT´s should be
given to communities by
2019. The agreement on
revising The Prosavana
Master Plan, MoU and
agreements signed by duty
52
bears with right holders).
53
# of women who
through partners´
support received
land titles (DUAT)
with verified
benefits
54
65
100
Minutes, partners
reports, ,M&E
visits
During 2015, ORAM
continued to support
women to acquire DUATs,
both individually and/or
collectively as members of
women associations or
gender mixed associations.
A total of 39 areas of
associations where
demarcated, benefiting 313
women. Additionally, CTV
carried out a study on
“Customary Rules and
Practices Strengthen
Women’s Land Tenure in
Rural
Mozambique”,(www.ctv.org.
mz or www.namati.og),
We1b: Civil society and rights holders
have improved their mobilization and
advocacy for land rights and benefits
from natural resources
1.5.1 # of
processes to
which CSO's have
been invited by
duty bearers
139 150 200
Theme 3:
Goal for
Theme 3:
Right to Accessible and Affordable Public Services of Good Quality
Empowered CSO (partner organization’s) defending the rights-holders (women and men) right to accessible, affordable and high quality public
services and to a safe and healthy environment
54
long-term
outcome:
Oxfam1: Duty-bearers increasingly
take citizens’ demands into account
and as a result, the State Budget to
key public service sectors (health,
water, public transport and social
protection) has increased with 25% as
compared to 2015
% of state
budget
allocated to key
public service
sectors
43.9% +8% +20% State budget According to 2015 Annual
reports from some partners
(Akilizetho, CIP, ESTAMOS,
Facilidade, Nweti, GMD e
PSCM-PS) that are part of
development
observatories, the
percentage of state
budget allocated to key
public sectors decreased
from 43,9 % at the
beginning of the year to
38,9%. This is under-
achievement as the target
was 46,9%.
IBIS3:
Female and male rights -holders and
CSO´s are able to make evidence
based suggestions to the
improvement of quality and coverage
of services in health and education
sector in the selected provinces and
local governments
1. Nº of annual
pieces of
evidence17
aimed at
improving
services in
Education
and Health
and / or
influencing
policy
decisions and
changes
(plans,
budgets)
NA18:
Educ: 0
Health: 0
ZA
Educ: 0
Heath: 0
NA:
Edu: 2
Health: 1
ZA
Educ: 3
Health: 2
NA:
Educ: 4
Health:
2
ZA
Educ: 6
Health:
3
Admin data;
IPO / CSO / PSO data,
(social)
Survey data.
Baseline survey; Mid-
term and final
On what regards the
Education Sector,
according to Balanço
Anual do PES 2015 for
Zambézia Province,
improvements were
reported in Education and
Health sectors. 84 new
schools became available
in the that province
reducing the province
average distance school-
home from 2,4 to 2,2 km in
EP1 and, 3,3 to 3,1 Km in
17 studies, statistics, survey, monitoring report etc. 18 NA stands for Nampula and ZA stands for Zambézia
55
produced
and
submitted to
subnational
executive
(municipal
and
provincial
governments)
and / or
sectorial
services;
evaluation survey;
Media coverage;
Partners reports; AGIR
reports; Balanço Anual
do Plano Económico
Social Provincial and
MINEDH and MISAU
Annual Reports.
EP2. Mocuba and Alto-
Molócue reported
respectively 3.2% and 0.4%
of increase in number of
schools available
comparatively with the
previous year [2014].
According to the same
report, ratio pupil/teacher
increased in the province
from 70 to 71.
In the Health Sector,
Zambézia province
registered an increase in
the number of health
centers available, with 3
more if compared to the
previous year and the
number of Medical
Doctors available in the
province also increased by
31.8%. Child and maternal
health coverage plan for
2015 in Mocuba and Alto-
Molócue districts was
exceeded by 14% and
4.4%, respectively.
According to MINEDH 2015
report, Nampula Province
hired 566 male and 567
female additional
teachers, reaching the
56
set target for the year
under review.
2. Quality of
submissions (non-
submission= 0;
poor = 1;
medium =2;
good=3);
NA:
Educ: 0
Health: 0
ZA
Educ: 0
Health: 0
NA:
Educ: 2
Health: 2
ZA
Educ: 3
Health: 2
NA:
Educ: 3
Health:
3
ZA
Educ: 3
Health:
3
3. Fix rate, in % NA:
Educ: 0
Health: 0
ZA
Educ: 0
Health: 0
NA
Educ: 30
Healt: 20
ZA
Educ: 30
Health: 20
NA
Educ 80
Health:
50
ZA
Educ:
80
Health:
50
57
We3: Rights holders (women and men)
are empowered to advocate for,
influence, monitor the implementation
of, and hold duty bearers
accountable for measures that secure
a safe and healthy environment and
promote resilience to climate change
impacts
We 3b: Civil society and rights holders
have improved their mobilization and
advocacy to promote policy change
# of spaces for
dialogue with
duty bearers,
advocacy
events and
mobilization
(alliances and
networks)
61
75
100
Policy papers/
documents, Open
letters, Media articles,
Minutes, Process plans,
Reports, Publications
During 2015, The Climate
change and environment
outcome areas have seen
considerable actions
especially at national level
(e.g. preparedness of civil
society to participate in
the Cop 21). 3
Considerable spaces of
dialogue with duty bearers
especially at national level
were established by
partners in this area of
results: First: A Joint
consultation Meeting with
MITADER to discuss and
prepare a common
document of Mozambique
to be presented in Cop
21/ (Intended National
Determined Contribution).
Second: The Seminar on
REDD + Initiative and
elaboration of the Kick Off
of the National REDD +
Strategy in Mozambique
organized by MITADER
Third: Under the National
Platform of SC
organization on Climate
Change, a Consultative
group were established
with MITADER to work on
climate change and
58
on equitable rural growth and right to
food
environment issues.
59
# of position
papers
contribute for
better dialogue
13
15
20 Position papers/
documents, Open
letters, Media articles,
Minutes, Reports,
Publications
8 position documents and
papers were developed
and submitted to
national or international
government’s regarding
the COP 21, Climate
Justice, common
principles of adaptation
and mitigation of Climate
Changes , REED+, EU
energy goals,
environmental impacts of
construction of Mphanda
Nkuwa dam on
Communities
Two Platforms revitalized in
2015, and conducted
meetings focused on
discussing environmental
issues and define
strategies for advocacy:
The National Platform of
CSO on Climate Change,
the forum of CSO for
marine and coastal area
FOSCAMC.
# and diversity of
strategies and
spaces for
mobilization and
advocacy by
CSO´s on
environment and
climate change
40
45
60
Policy papers/
documents, Open
letters, Media articles,
Minutes, Process plans,
Reports, Publications
Diakonia 1b)- There is a remarkable
increase of public resources (% of the
total state budget) allocated for
improved universal access to key
public service (justice, education,
health, SRHR, and social service) by
% of total state
budget
proportion
allocated to
each key service
area at national
Data of
2015
1-
educatio
191-
Education-
inclusive
schools not
progressing;
22.8%
10.2%
N/A
Annual budget and
annual budget
expenditure reports;
social and economic
plans;
Increased recognition, by
the duty bearers (the
elected and the
professional civil servants),
on the demands made, by
rights holders, for the need
19 Information provided by ACAMO (inclusive education, CESC (health services urban/rural), AMMCJ (justice).
60
the most vulnerable groups; level; n- 19.8%
2- Health -
9.1%
3-SRH -
N/A
4- Justice
–1.9%
5- social
service –
3.5%
2- Health –
poor access
on rural
areas and
for the poor;
3-SRH –
outdated
policy
4- Justice –
No
information
on access
at district
level;
5- social
service –
N/A
2.0%
3.6%
for improved state
performance in the
provision of public service
o quality (access to
education, health, SRHR,
justice, social service) in
Mozambique.
The state budget of 2015
indicates that there was
an increase of budget
allocated for the
improvement of key public
and basic services as we
can see below.
Education – 1248 million de
dollars, corresponding to
22,8% of the total budget
expenditure, against 1035
million dollars in 2014 (19,
8% of the total budget
Health including SRH–
561,5 million dollars (10, 2%
of the total budget),
representing an increase
of 1,1% against 477,6
million de dollars in 2014,
when the expenditure
attained 9,1%.i
Justice: 4,001.7meticas
equivalent to 2.0 % of the
total state budget against
61
3, 525.6 in metical in (2014)
equivalent to 1.9% of the
total budget.
Social Service (protection
and labor) - there was an
increase of 0, 1% (3.55)
increase in the total State
budget amount allocated,
equal to 7,087.5 against
the proposition of state
budget allocated was
6,509.7 equivalent to 3, 5%
of the total budget in 2014
Ratio (in #) of
available
professional’s in
each area
(teachers/
medical doctors/
judges) at district
level;
Data of
2015
1-
educatio
n- 1
teacher/6
9
2- Health
– 1 doctor
for 30.000
inhabitant
s;
3-SRH -
N/A
4- Justice
There has
been an
effort in
establishing
official
forums for
consultation
and policy
dialog with
CSO´s by
the
government
(at national
and
provincial
levels) with
different
levels of
openness to
1/50
1/25m
1/90 mil
N/A
Annual budget and
annual budget
expenditure reports;
social and economic
plans;
No information available
to report in 2015
62
– 1
judge/100
.000
inhabitant
s;
5- social
service –
be assessed;
Oxfam: 2.C.1: Duty-bearers adopt,
adapt and implement international
frameworks n SRHR
# of international
frameworks on
SRHR that
Mozambique has
ratified
3
(MDG,
Cairo
Declarati
on,
Internatio
nal
Planned
Parentho
od
Federatio
n)
3 4 MISAU 2014 PES
Review;
AMODEFA Annual
Reports
3 (Same as baseline and
target for 2015)
Oxfam: 2.c .1.1: CSO´s with capacity
to monitor international protocols on
SRHR
# of CSO´s finish-
ed capacity
building to
monitor inter-
national SRHR
frameworks
1
(FM)
720 7 Partners Annual
Reports
5 (FM, WLSA, Lambda,
HOPEM, Nweti)
20 WLSA, N’weti, CIP, HOPEM, FM, RENSIDA, LAMBDA
63
Oxfam: 2.c.2: Increased dialogue
and interaction between CSO´s and
duty-bearers on the quality and
accessibility of SRH care
# of government
events at all
levels to which
CSO´s are invited
to present their
information on
SRH care quality
and access
4 6 10 MISAU National
Coordinating Council
Aid Memoire;
Bi-Annual MISAU
Meetings with partners
Nweti (Invited by the
Ministry of Health during
the National Coordinating
Council and MoH-NGOs
Meeting), Lambda and
RENSIDA (Invited by the
AIDS National Council for
review of the PENIV),
Forum Mulher and PSCM-
PS (Invited by the Ministry
of Gender, Child and
Social Action to deliver
speeches during the
National Meeting with
partners)
# communities in
Maputo province
and city, Sofala,
Nampula,
Zambezia and
Niassa
participating in
SRH service
quality
monitoring
0
75 150 Reports of public
service provision
monitoring exercises
112 communities (Nweti –
26; SA- 4; Facilidade – 38;
Estamos – 27; NAFEZA – 5
and Wadzafika - 12
Oxfam:2.c.3: Reduced maternal and
child mortality rate trough the
improve the quality of SRH services
Maternal
mortality rate
0.13% -10% -25% MISAU 2015 PES
Review
0,4
Infant mortality
rate
79.2% -4% -10% MISAU 2015 PES
Review
N’weti, Facilidade, AMME
continued to work with the
64
Ministry of Health and its
local institutions to
promote institutional
deliveries among mothers-
to-be. Quantitative figures
will be updated through
the MTR in 2018
% pregnant
women who
completed 4
anti-natal care
visits
69% 84% 99% MISAU 2015 PES
Review
85%
Oxfam: 2.c.4: Duty-bearers are
responsive to CSO claims for approval
of law on abortion and its
implementation in practice.
# law on
abortion
approved
1 1 1 State Journal 1 (as per baseline and
target for 2015). WLSA,
N’weti, FM, NAFEZA ,
AMME and Lambda
continued to do
advocacy for the
implementation of the
Penal Code
% of sanitary units
providing safe
abortion
30% 50% 65% Reports of sanitary
units; MISAU Report
To be updated in 2018 MTR
# of CSO´s with
capacity to
engage with
2
(WLSA,
6 921 Capacity building
assessments
5 (WLSA, FM, Nweti,
Lambda, HOPEM)
21 WLSA, N’weti, CIP, HOPEM, FM, RENSIDA, , LAMBDA, ESTAMOS, Wadzafica.
65
duty-bearers and
moral authorities
on issues related
to abortion law
FM)
Oxfam:2.c.5: CSO´s effectively stage
ICT-base advocacy campaigns to
raise awareness and change attitude
and practises and eliminate harmful
cultural practices and prejudices that
promote early marriages, unwanted
pregnancies and sexual violations
# CSO using ICT-
based advocacy
campaigns on
SRHR and
underlying norms
and prcatices
3
(LAMBDA,
Nweti,
FM)
6 922 Campaign
evaluations and
reports
5 (LAMBDA, Nweti, FM,
HOPEM, FM )
DIAKONIA 3 - There is a markable
increase of public resources
allocated for improved universal
access to key public service (justice,
education, health, SRHR, and social
service) by the most vulnerable
groups;;
Rate of access to
family planning in
health posts per
districts covered
by partners
working on SRHR;
Zambézia
– 6.5%
Niassa –
6%
Zambézia –
8%
Niassa – 8%
Zambézi
a – 12%
Niassa –
11%
Ministry of health
reports/ INE reports
Regarding government
improved actions, for
better and inclusive SRH
service delivery in 2015,
the main changes
reported were at policy
and legislation levels
(AMMCJ and Muleide).
New strategies and
policies were put in place
as reported above. No
substantial evidences
were found/ reported
indicating any meaningful
change on governmental
performance to better
deliverer services at
Rate of access to
safe childbirth/
institutionalized
child delivery
services per
districts covered
Zambézia
- 27.8%
Zambézia-
29%
Niassa – 63%
Zambézi
a- 32%
Niassa –
65%
Ministry of health
reports/ INE reports
22 WLSA, N’weti, CIP, HOPEM, FM, RENSIDA, , LAMBDA, ESTAMOS, Wadzafica.
66
by partners
working on SRHR;
;
Niassa –
61.4%
province and district levels.
The new approved
strategy for family
planning23, with a
reference method on
women and girls at the
community and sanitary
unities has become more
important; a sign that
inclusion of women and
girls at community level, as
regarding SRH service, has
become a real public
policy priority. This strategy
implies the allocation of
more resources to SRH at
communities’ levels
(working at national level –
AMMCJ, FORCOM, and
YP; at provincial and
district level – NANA,
AMUDZA, ADEMUM –
Zambézia; Othoko—
Niassa, CESC, at selected
districts and
municipalities).
Rate of access to
free
contraceptives,
for safe sex life,
per districts
covered by
partners working
on SRHR;;
Zambézia
– 4.7%
Niassa –
12.4%
Zambézia-
6%
Niassa – 14%
Zambézi
a- 10%
Niassa –
18%
Ministry of health
reports/ INE reports
% pregnancies
with access to
prenatal and
antenatal health
services per
districts covered
by partners
working on SRHR
Zambézia
– 74%
Niassa –
90%
Zambézia –
77%
Niassa – 92%
Zambézi
a – 80%
Niassa –
95%
Ministry of health
reports/INE reports
23 Estratégia de Planeamento Familiar e Contracepção, approved in June 2010
67
% of population
with access to
medicines for
sexually
transmitted
diseases per
districts covered
by partners
working on SRHR
Not
available
- - District government
reports – health sector
Ministry of health
reports/INE reports
The Government is
implementing the
integrated Protocol for
assistance of women and
girls who have been
victims of sexual
harassment and domestic
violence (2012) - AMMCJ
and Muleide. In 2015, the
implementation of the
protocol was carried out in
partnership with CSO´s; the
main outcome was the
provision of capacity
building trainings to
technical personnel from
the health sector. The
focus of trainings was on
the functionality of the
mentioned protocol, with
reference to the Provincial
Health Department in
Niassa, 2015 the
implementation of the
protocol has also resulted
in expansion of health
technicians providing
psychiatric assistance to
victims of sexual
harassment and violence.
Theme 4:
Goal for
Right to basic civic freedoms. # 2 3 5
68
theme 4:
To contribute for an environment where people’s rights to expression, freedom and information’s is
guaranteed by law and respected all duty bearers;
Long-term
outcome: IBIS4: Freedom of expression, press freedom and diversity and RTI guaranteed in law and adhered to by duty bearers in practice
Country has
signed and
ratified all
relevant treaty
obligations and
regimes, with no
significant
exemptions (yes
/ no
No
yes
yes Reporters Without
Borders annual reports
The 2015 World Press
Freedom Index by
Reporters Without
Borders, released in the
first quarter of 2016,
reveals that
Mozambique dropped 2
positions on the world
press freedom, which is
(according to the same
source) due to self-
censorship and
assassination of a
journalist in 2015. Now,
Mozambique is in
position 87 out of 180
countries. The legal
environment as such did
have a positive change,
thanks to approval of the
RTI by-law. Regarding to
the adherence to
international treaties on
the matter, we expected
to commence the
process to join the Open
Government Partnership
Initiative, to which only
countries that have Right
69
to Information Law are
eligible. In 2016, more
concrete work will be
done at the level of
central duty bearers (via
the Ministério da
Administração Estatal e
Função Pública), with
which AICE
subprogramme has
already signed a MoU
aimed at promoting
wide access to public
interest information,
especially the one held
by the Government.
-Public is aware
of law enabling
access to official
information (No
awareness=0,
low degree= 1;
medium = 2;
high = 3).
0
2
3
Regional [SADC] Press
Freedom NGOs annual
reports;
Freedom House annual
reports
Regarding the
knowledge of the Right
to Information (RTI) law,
in 2015 the activities
focused on the
preparation of the Right
to Information ByLaw,
Partners proposed this
document that was
adopted almost in full
by the Government.
Furthermore, to ensure
that the principles of the
RTI law are respected,
the process of preparing
70
a study which presents
all legislation contrary to
the Right to Information
(Lei de Segredo do
Estado, Lei de
Segurança de Estado,
Lei de Imprensa e Lei de
Probidade Publica) has
been initiated. The draft
will be submitted to the
Parliament in 2016.
% of public bodies (govt and public companies) releasing information both pro-actively and on demand
20%
50%
90%
Laws revoked and/or
revised;
PO surveys
2015 was the first year
after the adoption of
the Right to Information
Law, so that there were
10 training sessions and
dissemination to duty
bearers (217) and CSO´s
(50) .In 2015, a survey on
the pre-conditions for
effective
implementation of RIL
was also concluded: this
found that the
preparedness of the
duty bearers and
proactive dissemination
of relevant information is
essential for the RTI law
to be effectively
implement. In 2016 AICE
71
will monitor the level of
public information
released by the
competent bodies and
the institutionalization of
information officer posts
in public sector.
Theme 5:
Goal for
theme 5
Right to Political Representation and Participation
To contribute for an improved, transparent, participative and gender inclusive democratic and political processes in Mozambique
4Long-term
outcome:
IBIS2: Female and male
parliamentarians at sub national levels
(provincial and local) in target areas
playing their oversight role and
demanding accountability from the
executive
1. % of women
chairing
parliamentary
committees
APs24: 25
AMs25: 12
APs: 30
AMs: 20
APs: 50
AMs: 30
Records of
parliamentary
administration and
municipal parliaments;
No data available at the
end of 2015. Partners
didn’t have in 2015
monitoring systems in
place with indicators
that could be used to
capture that information.
They are revising their
monitoring matrixes and
this information will be
collected during 2016.
2. Evidence of
competencies
of male and
female duty
bearers /
APs: 0
AMs: Yes
APs: Yes
AMs: Yes
APs: Yes
AMs: Yes
Parliamentary records,
CSO data, media
reports;
No data available at the
end of 2015. Partners
didn’t have in 2015
monitoring systems in
place with indicators
24 AP stands for Assembleia Provincial 25 AM stands for Assembleia Municipal
72
parliamentaria
ns’
(´champions’)
understanding
of
parliamentary
oversight and
accountability
role (Yes/ no)
that could be used to
capture that information.
They are revising their
monitoring matrixes and
this information will be
collected during 2016.
3. Increase of
queries on
sectorial and
geographical
spending
priorities in
plans and
budgets
tabled to
executives at
all levels (no
increase=0;
slight increase
= 1; medium
increase=2;
good
increase=3)
APs: 0
AMs: 0
APs: 1
AMs: 2
APs: 2
AMs: 3
Parliamentary records,
CSO data, media
coverage;
No data available at the
end of 2015. Partners
didn’t have in 2015
monitoring systems in
place with indicators
that could be used to
capture that information.
They are revising their
monitoring matrixes and
this information will be
collected during 2016
Nº of cases of
non-approval of
municipal PAO
and/or Conta de
Gerência (in all
municipalities in
target areas)
0 2 3 Records of Assembleias
Municipais (AM) and
media reports.
During 2015 there were
no cases of non-
approval of municipal
PAO and/or Conta de
Gerência (in all
municpalities in target
areas)
73
Diakonia 2a).- The process and results
of the elections are transparent,
reliable, complying with international
electoral standards (e.g. SADC
electoral principles and guidelines
and IDEA);
# of elections
observation
institutions which
clearly26
declared the
elections as
having been fair
and transparent;
0/8 –
National
(O.E, CIP,
PJ, ONP,
LDH,
FORCOM,
CESC,
OAM),
1/6-
Internationa
l (EU, SADC,
Carter
Foundation,
CEDEAO,
CPLP, EISA,
0/8 –
National
(O.E, CIP,
PJ, ONP,
FORCOM
, CESC,
OAM),
1/6-
Internatio
nal (EU,
SADC,
Carter
Foundati
on,
CEDEAO,
CPLP,
EISA,
- -All This expected long term
outcome is still to be
realized. Next elections
are expected only in
2018 and 2019.
Meanwhile, the Electoral
Observatory has started,
in 2015, a consultative
work towards the
development of a
position paper and a
political/legislative
proposal to review the
electoral framework and
add new contributions
from civil society aiming
at bridging the outcome
level, contribute to a
reform on the present
framework that would
ensure that “a broadly
accepted (legal and
institutional) electoral
framework by the main
political actors (political
parties and civil society
organizations) has been
in place. Main activities
towards this outcome
are to be carried out
Level of
consensus (three
level scale)
around the
reliability of the
electoral process
and results (as
reported in the
final statement of
the Constitutional
Council) by the
contestant
political parties);
Among the
contestant
political
parties 29
out of 30
did not
endorse the
2013 and
2014
election
process and
results as
being
reliable.
Among
the
contesta
nt
political
parties
29 out of
30 did
not
endorse
the 2013
and 2014
- At least the 3 main
political parties;
26 In all electoral processes since 1999, we had some observers that never declared or stated that the elections were “fair and transparent”. Some say that the irregularities observed were not enough to alter the results. Others used different wording but not a clear statement. This is something that partners have interest to monitor, considering it relevant.
74
Frelimo
party
declared it
as being
reliable ;
election
process
and
results as
being
reliable.
Frelimo
party
declared
it as
being
reliable27;
along 2016.
Diakonia 2b) - The Public policy
development process is politically
and socially inclusive and
participatory;
# of political
parties
participating in
political debate
and electoral
process;
Political
parties - 30
political
parties out
of 61 and 14
coalitions
have been
registered
for the last
electoral
process. But
3 (Frelimo,
Renamo
and MDM)
are the
ones active
in political
debate;
-10 -15 Political profile reports
and government
website;
There was some
openness from
government institutions
for participation and
engagement of civil
society organizations on
services delivered (e.g.
education, health care,
SRHR) public policy
development and
implementation process.
This participation tends
to be institutionalized in
consultative and
participations forums
such as:
✓ CNAC (National
Council for the
27 We see a challenge for partners to have access to information as suggested: in all 51 municipalities, 10 province assemblies.
75
level of
participation
(three level
scale) of
vulnerable
groups (women,
youth, children,
disabled, poor’s
and HIV positive
people) in
political debate
and influence;
Women –
medium
Youth –
medium
Children –
low
Disabled
people –
low
Poor’s – low
PLW HIV-
AIDS –
medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Medium
- High
- High
- Medium
- Medium
- Medium
- High
Analytical studies,
evaluations and reports
from different sources:
Gov, UNDP, World Bank,
Advance of
Child Rights)
phased out in
2015 and
substituted by a
broader council-
CNAS – reported
by Rede da
Criança and
Rede CAME;
✓ Development
Observatories –
reported by all
partners;
The new participatory
mechanism reported to
2015 was:
✓ CNAS (National
Council of Social
Action) this has
been
established in
2015 and is an
aggregation of
different councils
(child
advancement
council, women
advancement
council, elderly
# of formal
participatory
policy dialog
frameworks,
participated by
sub-programme
partners,
extended to
province levels28;
1. CNAC-
Conselho
Nacional
da Criança;
1.. Child
observatory
– bill
proposal;
1. RARA –
Reunião
Annual de
Revisão do
3 6 Assessment studies and
reports of political
participation;
28This means that the POs of national outreach will be accessed also at provincial level, by the work of their delegations, member´s organizations or focal points.
76
Sector da
Educação
advancement
council etc.).
CSO´s partners
working on
child´s rights
(ACAMO, Rede
da Criança REDE
CAME, and
ACABE) to claim
that the decision
of merging all
these councils in
one was not
participatory
and has
reduced the
number of
representation of
civil society
organizations in
the consultative
forum. To
exemplify, Rede
da Criança
reported that
CNAS child rights
organizations
used to be
represented by 7
organizations but
in the new CNAS
framework the
number has
been reduced
77
to only two
representations.
There are positive reports
from partners indicating
that “duty bearers have
included rights holder’s
claims and concerns
regarding inclusive assess
to justice, political
participation, education,
health, SRHR, social
service, into the policy
and governance
agenda”. besides text
above, regarding new
policy and legal
frameworks in debate or
approved by the
parliaments such as:
✓ The approval of
national strategy
against
premature
marriages –
partially
achieved with
advocacy
carried out by
AMMCJ,FORCO
M, MULEIDE,
Rede da
Criança, Rede
78
CAME (national
level), Othoko
and ACABE
(Niassa), and
Amudza
(Mocuba,
Zambézia).
✓ The debate on
inclusive and
rehabilitative
education for
people with
disabilities –
partly approved
with the actions
of ACAMO
79
8.4. CSO´S CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
29 Results Framework as in Overarching Proposal Version 19th February 2015. 30 All baseline figures refer to the cumulative status at end-AGIR I 31 POs in this framework refer to partners receiving core support from one of the four intermediaries 32 Diak; 100% (12/12); IBIS; 84% (11/13); Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE:84% (11/13) 33 Diak; 83% (10/12); IBIS; 90% (12/13) Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE: 100% (13/13) 34 Diak; 17 % (2/12); IBIS; 16 % (2/13); Oxfam 30 % (7/22); WE 23 % (3/13)
Theme 6: CSO´s Capacity Development29
Long-term Outcome 5 (for all IPOs): POs are Effective and Sustainable Agents of Transformational Change
Objectively verifiable
indicators
Baseline30
(Jan 2015)
Target Means of verification
Status by End of 2015
Mid-term
(Dec 2017)
End-line
(Dec 2020)
Bridging
Outcomes
(in bold)
and Outputs
(below)
5.1 POs31 are considered
democratic, well governed,
legitimate by their members
and support base,
accountable and apply
strong management
practices
% of POs with approved
strategic and operational
plans
94 %
(56/59)
100% (X/X) 100% (X/X) POs Annual Plans and
Reports
100% (59/59)
% of POs holding regular
(annual) general meetings
according to the frequency
in their statutes
94 %
(56/59)
95% (X/X)
100% (X/X) General Assemblies
minutes
96% (57/59)32
% of POs with unqualified
audit reports
69% (41/59) 80% (X/X) 90% (X/X) POs Audit Reports;
IPOs staff monitoring visit
reports
88% (51/59)33
% of POs that produce and
share consolidated plans
and reports through their
website
20 %
(12/59)
70% (X/X) 100% (X/X) POs websites 23% (14/59)34
80
35 Diak: 17 % (2/12) (FORCOM, OTHOKO); IBIS: 31 % (4/13) (ACDH; OAM; KUKUMBI; Solidariedade); Oxfam: 59 % (13/22) (AMME, NAFEZA, PNDH, N'WETI, LAMBDA, ESTAMOS, FACILIDADE, AKILIZETHO, FM, WLSA, CIP, JOINT, HOPEM); WE 38 % (5/13) (OMR, AENA, AMPCM, ORAM, Udeba-Lab) 36 Diak: 42 % (5/12) (ACAMO, CEDE, OE, FORCOM, MULEIDE); IBIS: 100 % (13/13); Oxfam: 64 % (14/22) (WLSA, CIP, GMD, HOPEM, SA, N'WETI, Facilidade, Akilizetho, JOINT, AMME, NAFEZA, PNDH, ESTAMOS, LAMBDA); WE: 100 % (13/13 37 The audit reports are sometimes not delivered in time, but due to reasons beyond the control of partners 38 Diak: 50% (6/12); IBIS; 92 % (12/13) Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE; 100% (13/13) 39 Diak; 41% (5/12) IBIS; 100% (13/13); Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE: 100% (13/13)
% of PO’s with at least 50% of
members paying quotas
33 %
(20/59)
50 % (X/X) 70 % (X/X) PO Reports 38 % (23/59)35
% of POs that deliver reports
(narrative, financial and
audit) within the deadline
73 %
(43/59)
95 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) Intermediary records and
assessments of reports
91 % (54/59)3637
5.1.1 POs capacity
strengthened in good
governance of their
organizations
% POs underwent capacity
building in good governance
of their organizations
94 %
(56/59)
Annual: 100
% (X/X)
Cumulative:
100 % (X/X)
Annual: 100 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
100 % (X/X)
Capacity building
assessments; 5C
assessment
Annual: 89 % (53/59)38
Cumulative: 94 %
(56/59)
5.1.2 POs internal
governance, accountability
and transparency
strengthened
% of social organs of all POs
actors meet as per regularity
specified in their statues
94 %
(56/59)
100 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) General Assemblies
minutes; monitoring visit
reports;
Reports of internal
meetings of social organs.
100% (59/59)
% of partners whose reports
(narrative, financial and
audit) were approved by the
general assembly
98 %
(58/59)
100 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) General Assemblies
minutes; Monitoring visit
reports;
Reports of internal
meetings of social organs.
100% (59/59)
5.1.3: POs capacity
strengthened in financial,
HRM and results-based
management
%POs underwent capacity
building in financial, HRM,
and RBM management
94 %
(56/59)
Annual: 100
% (X/X)
Cumulative:
100 % (X/X)
Annual: 100 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
100 % (X/X)
Capacity building
assessments; 5C
assessment, FSA reports
Annual: 88 % (52/59)39
Cumulative: 94 %
81
40 Averages per intermediary: Diak: 55 %, IBIS: 64%; Oxfam 56 %; WE 30 % 41 Averages per intermediary: Diak: 64,5 %, IBIS: 74 %; Oxfam 59 %; WE 33,5 % 42 Diak: 100 % (12/12), IBIS; 100 % (13/13) Oxfam: 59 % (13/22) (SA, Akilizetho, AMME, Facilidade, FM, GMD, Hopem, Lambda, N´weti, NAFEZA, PNDH, PSCM-PS, WLSA); WE 100 % (13/13) 43 Diak; 2 (16%) IBIS; 4 (25 %) Oxfam; 22 (100%); WE: 13 (100 %) 44 Diak: 0,8 % (1/12) (CESC); IBIS: 0%; Oxfam: 36 % (8/22) (CIP, Facilidade, FM, N´weti, WLSA, JOINT, SA, Wadzafica) WE 0,7 %(1/13) (CTV) 45Diak; 75 % (9/12) (AMMCJ, Rede Came, CEDE, Muleide, Othoko, CESC, Forcom, Acabe, PJ); IBIS 62 % (8/13) (ACDH, AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, KUKUMBI, GDI; OAM); OXFAM 45 % (10/22) (WLSA, HOPEM, AMME, NAFEZA, SA, GMD, PNDH, FACILIDADE, FM, Nweti); WE 69 % (9/13) (AAAJC, AENA, ABIODES, CTV, JA, Livaningo, ORAM, UNAC, UPCT) 46 Diak:50 % (6/12) (Muleide, AMMCJ, PJ, R. CAME, NANA, FORCOM) IBIS: 62 % (8/13) (ACDH, AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, KUKUMBI, GDI; OAM); Oxfam: 91 % (20/22) (all except CEMO and CIP); WE: 46 % (6/13) (AENA, CTV, ORAM, Abiodes, UNAC, Livaningo)
POs average % dependency
of AGIR
51%40 45 % 30 % Financial reports 58 % 41
% of POs with M&E systems in
place
86 %
(51/59)
90 % (X/X) 100%( X/X) POs Annual Plans and
Reports, M&E meeting
minutes
86 % (51/59)42
5.1.4 Members participate in
strategic planning exercise
% POs that include members
in their strategic planning
process
94 %
(56/59)
100 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) POs Annual Plans and
Reports, minutes
100% (59/59)
5.1.5 POs strengthened to
mainstream environment
and climate change in their
strategic and operational
plans
% of POs that include
mainstream environment
and climate change in their
strategic and operational
plans and internal
documents
30 %
(18/59)
Annual: 15 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
60% (X/X)
Annual: 15 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
100% (X/X)
Reports of capacity
building assessments
Annual: 39 % (23/59)
Cumulative: 69 %
(41/59)43
5.1.6 Partners have their anti-
corruption policies and
implement them
% of POs that have internal
anti-corruption policies in
place
0,01 %
(1/59)
Annual: 10 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
30 % (X/X)
Annual: 10 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
90% (X/X)
POs Anti-corruption
Internal Policies
17 % (10/59)44
5.2 Strengthened gender
mainstreaming among AGIR
POs at programme and
activity level, as well as in
the work place
% of POs that have gender
equality policies formulated
75% (44/59) Annual: 10 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
75% (X/X)
Annual: 10 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
100% (X/X)
POs Gender Internal
Policies
Reports of capacity
building assessments
Annual: 62% (37/59) 45
Cumulative: 62% (37/59)
% of partners doing gender
analysis in project or
programme strategic
69 %
(41/59)
Annual: 10 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
Annual: 10 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
Reports of capacity
building assessments
Annual: 67 % (40/59)46
Cumulative: 67 %
(40/59)
82
47 Diak: 33% (4/12) (Muleide, AMMCJ, FORCOM, PJ); IBIS 0 %; Oxfam 18 % (4/22) (WLSA, FM, LAMBDA, HOPEM); WE 23 % (3/13) (UNAC, ORAM, CTV) 48 Diak 40% (5/12); IBIS 46% (6/13); Oxfam 50% (11/22); WE 46% (6/13) 49 Activity was not carried out in 2015 50 While some partners have gender indicators other, the majority provide gender desegregated information and very few effectively do gender analyses. 51 UNAC (WE) 52 Activity was not carried out in 2015
documents 75% (X/X) 100% (X/X)
% of POs involved in regional
initiatives on gender issues
22% (13/59) 30% (X/X) 50% (X/X) Gender Link reports
SADC gender Protocol
Barometer
19% (11/59) 47
% of partners with at least
50% of women working and
represented in leadership
decision- making positions
67 %
(40/59)
70% (X/X) 90% (X/X) Annual plans and report 45% (27/59)48
5.2.1 AGIR POs applying
tools to address and monitor
progress in regard to
promoting gender equality
and justice and women’s
empowerment
% of partners trained on
developing gender
indicators, gender
disaggregation and gender
analysis
0% (0/59) Annual: 60%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
70 % (X/X)
Annual: 100%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
100 % (X/X)
IPO monitoring reports 0% 49
% of partners applying
gender indicators, gender
disaggregation and gender
analysis
0% (0/59) 60% (X/X) 80%(X/X) POs Annual reports
POs Annual Plans
0%50
% of partners trained in the
system for equitable
allocation of funds
methodology (FRAS)
0,01 %
(151/59)
Annual: 80%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
81 %
Annual: 19 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
100% (X/X)
Budget, Financial reports Annual 2015: 0% (0/59)52
Cumulative: 0,01 %
(1/59)
% of partners implementing
the system for equitable
allocation of funds
methodology (FRAS)
0,01 %
(1/59)
Annual: 10%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
30% (X/X)
Annual: 10%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
60% (X/X)
POs Annual reports
POs Annual Plans
Annual 2015: 0% (0/59)
Cumulative: 0,01 %
(1/59)
% of partners implementing
the system for equitable
allocation of funds
0,16%
(1/59)
Annual: 5%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
Annual: 5%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
Budget and financial
reports
Annual 2015: 0% (0/59)
Cumulative: 0,16 %
(1/59)
83
53 Those events were: Rural women Fair (ORAM), International Women day (WLSA/FM), Rural Women’s National Conference (Forum Mulher), National Conference on the SADC Gender Protocol (FM ans WLSA) ;1 position paper against gender based violence among PO in Maputo (MULEIDE); 2 workshops : one on Law of Succession regarding women position in heritage and the other) discussed Family Law on union fact regulation (AAMCJ) 54 Diak: 1 (National Strategy on Prevention of Early Marriage); IBIS: 2 (Aprovação da Lei do Direito à Informação em 2014 & Regulamentação da Lei do Direito à Informação; Oxfam 3 (PENIV, National Strategy on Prevention of Early Marriage, Set Up of CECAP) WE: 2 (Prosavana, Terra Segura) 55 No staff swapping occured in 2015 56 Diak 42% (5/12); IBIS 66% (9/13); Oxfam 53% (12/22); WE 46 % (6/13) 57 Diak: 42% (5/12); IBIS: 58% (7/13); OXFAM: 50% (11/22); WE: 38% (5/13) 58 Diak: 33 % (4/12) (ACABE, ADEMUM, AMUDZA, NANA) IBIS: 62 % (8/13) (ACDH, AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, KUKUMBI, GDI, Sekelekani) Oxfam: 90 % (20/22) WE: 100 % (13/13)
methodology (FRAS) that
reach the 50 % goal
20% (X/X) 40% (X/X)
5.2.2 Coordination between
AGIR POs on gender-
sensitive advocacy and
dialogue strengthened
# of events/position papers
/seminars/campaigns in
gender are held by partners
per year
3/year 3/year 3/year Annual reports, position
papers
7 events53
# of policy changes with
contribution from CSO´s
10 Annual: 5
Cumulative:
15
Annual: 5
Cumulative:
25
POs Annual reports
Reports of the events
Annual: 854
Cumulative: 18
# of staff swapping in
between the partners
10 Annual: 10
Cumulative:
30
Annual: 10
Cumulative:
30
Annual reports Annual: 055
Cumulative: 10
5.3 AGIR partners upscale
HIV/AIDS interventions
internally & externally and
have the capacity to
provide an effective
response to the right holders
% of POs that have HIV/AIDS
policies formulated
50% (30/59) 80% (X/X) 90% (X/X) POs HIV Internal Policies
Reports of capacity
building assessments
50% (30/59)56
% of POs mainstreaming
internally and externally
HIV/AIDS issues
45% (27/59) 50% (X/X) 75% (X/X) Annual report and plans 45% (27/59)57
5.3.1 POs with capacity to
mainstream HIV/AIDS
% of POs trained on how to
mainstream internally &
externally HIV/AIDS
86 %
(51/59)
Annual: 60%
(X/X)
Cumulative:
70 % (X/X)
Annual 30 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
100% (X/X)
POs HIV Internal Policies
Reports of capacity
building assessments
Annual: 76% (45/59)58
Cumulative: 85 %
(51/59)
84
59 # rather than % here since it is not applicable for all AGIR partner 60 Diak: 33 % (4/12) (MULEIDE, AMMCJ, REDE DA CRIANÇA, OTHOKO); IBIS; 0, 7 % (1/13) (KUKUMBI); Oxfam: 32 % (7/22) (RENSIDA, N'weti, Hopem, Lambda, FM, WLSA, ESTAMOS); WE: 0 % (n/a) 61 The policies revised and/or adopted are: PENIV and the National Strategy on Prevention from and Fight Against Early Marriage 62 Activity not carried out in in 2015 63 Diak: 5 (Muleide, Nana, Othoko, Forcom, PJ); IBIS: 2 - (KUKUMBI e GDI); Oxfam: 7 (RENSIDA, N'weti, Hopem, Lambda, FM, WLSA, ESTAMOS) WE: 0 64 The programs are: Tua Cena (N’weti – National coverage), Global Fund (Lambda – Maputo City, Beira, Nampula), “Youth Today, Time to Act” (PJ – Maputo) 65 The events were: Health Sector Partners’ Health Fair; 2015 Consultative Meeting-side Health Fair; campaign against early marriage; campaign to sensitize woman in relation to prevention and treatment of obstetric fistula
5.3.2 POs are innovative,
creative and work in
strategic partnerships on
HIV/AIDS
#59 of POs engaged in
strategic partnerships and
networks with HIV/AIDS
specialized organizations
12 15 15 Annual report and plans 1260
5.4 POs are trained on SRHR
and influence for better
quality service on SRHRs for
women, men, girls and boys
# of SRHR related public
policies revised and/or
adopted
1 Annual: 1
Cumulative:
3
Annual: 1
Cumulative: 5
Annual reports plans Annual: 261
Cumulative: 3
5.4.1 POs strengthened on
SRHR and including it in their
plans
# of training sessions carried
out in SRHR
0 Annual: 1
Cumulative:
1
Annual: 0
Cumulative 2
Training reports Annual: 062
# of relevant partners that
include SRHR in their plans
14 Annual: 2
Cumulative:
16
Annual: 1
Cumulative:
19
POs Strategic and
operational plans
1463
5.4.2 POs and rights holders
have access to information
on SRHR
# of programs on
comprehensive SRHR
information to teenagers and
youth (girls and boys)
4 15 30 Annual reports & plans 464
# of events/seminars held
promoting SRHR-related
issues
2 10 20 Annual reports & plans 465
85
66 Prosavana (Oxfam partners in Nampula, Akilizetho and Falicidade),, Climate Change/ COP 21 (Livaningo, JA!) Campaign on human rights; 16 activism days (Forum Mulher, WLSA, Lambda, Joint, Hopem); campaign against trial of human right defenders (Castelo Branco and Fernando Banze) (Joint and WLSA),; campaign against Early marriage (WLSA, Lambda, Hopem, FM, all under SRHR Network); campaign for the approval of the RTIL By-law (Regulamento) (Sekelekani) 67 Diak: 75 % (9/12) (Forcom, ACAMO, AMMCJ, CESC, R. CAME, R.Criança, PJ,CEDE, Muleide); IBIS: 69 % (9/13) (AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, IESE, KUKUMBI, GDI, OAM, Sekelekani); Oxfam: 32 % (7/22) (WLSA, PSCM-PS, Lambda, Nweti, CIP, HOPEM, JOINT); WE: 85 % (11/13) (UPCT; AMA; AJC; AMPCM; AENA;CTV; JA!; Livaningo; OMR; ORAM; UNAC) 68 Diak: 33 % (4/12) (PJ, R. Criança, AMMCJ, MULEIDE); IBIS: 0,7 % (1/13) (Sekelekani); Oxfam: 18 % (4/22) (WLSA, CIP, JOINT, HOPEM); WE: 23 % (3/13) (UNAC, Livaningo, ORAM)
5.5 POs are effective,
creative, dynamic, work in
networks and are
resourceful enough to
accomplish their mission
and vision using innovative
technical (websites & social
media) tools in their
interventions
# of joint public campaigns
organized by POs
12 Annual: 10
Cumulative:
30
Annual: 10
Cumulative:
60
POs annual plans and
reports
Annual: 866
Cumulative: 20
# of national and regional
linkages and networks
created among POs
11 Annual: 5
Cumulative:
20
Annual: 3
Cumulative:
30
POs annual plans and
reports
Annual: 4
Cumulative: 19
# of POs thematic
knowledge improved by
sharing their experience
(lesson leaning and best
practice) between each
other
17 Annual: 5
Cumulative:
30
Annual: 5
Cumulative:
45
Reports of experience
exchange reports
Annual: 6
Cumulative: 23
# of position papers released 25 Annual: 25
Cumulative:
100
Annual: 25
Cumulative:
175
Newspaper cuts Annual: 62
Cumulative: 87
% of POs that have functional
websites
50% (29/59) 60% (X/X) 75% (X/X) POs webpages 61% (36/59)67
% of POs activist networks to
stage their advocacy
20% (12/59) Annual: 5 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
30 % (X/X)
Annual: 3 %
(X/X)
Cumulative:
45 % (X/X)
POs activists network
register; POs activists
feeding communications;
POs databases
Annual: 20% (12/59)68
Cumulative: 20% (12/59)
86
69 Diak: 75 % (9/12) (ACAMO, ACABE, AMMCJ, MULEIDE,FORCOM, CESC, R.CAME, R.CRIANÇA, PJ); IBIS: 38 % (5/13) (CAICC, CODD IESE, KUKUMBI, OAM, Sekelekani); Oxfam: 32% (7/22) (WLSA, PSCM-PS, Lambda, Nweti, CIP, HOPEM, JOINT) WE: 100 % (13/13) 70 All applicable/that have delegations 71 IESE, CIP, Fórum Mulher, GMD, CTV, OMR 72 Diak: 0 % ; IBIS: 0,7 % (1/13) (IESE); Oxfam: 18 % (4/22) (CIP, FM, GMD, Estamos); WE: 15 % (2/13) (CTV, OMR) 73 Diak: 42 % (5/12) (AMMCJ, FORCOM,R. CAME, CESC, Muleide); IBIS: 23 % (3/13) (IESE, KUKUMBI, Sekelekani); Oxfam: 27 % (6/22) (CIP, N´weti, GMD, LAMBDA, FM, HOPEM); WE: 54 % (7/13) (AAAJC, AENA, UNAC, CTV, Livaningo, ORAM, JA!)
% of partner POs that use
social media (Facebook,
twitter, Google, Instagram,
blogs) to implement their
advocacy and disseminate
their results
52 %
(31/59)
70% (X/X) 90% (X/X) POs social media pages 57% (34/59)69
5.5.1 Improved connections
between POs and their
provincial delegations
% of core funding contracts
signed with POs with clauses
on support to provincial
branches
13, 5 %
(8/59)
72 % (X/X)
72 % (X/X) Contracts between IPOs
and partners
72% (42/59)70
% of PO’s with delegations
that transfer part of the fund
to their provincial
delegations
43 %
(18/42)
50 % (X/X)
60 % (X/X) POS budget
POs financial and
narrative reports
55% (23/42)
% of POs with delegations
that transfer funds that reach
the goal of 30 %
0 % (0/42) 5 % (X/X) 10 % (X/X) POS budget
POs financial and
narrative reports
0 % (0/42)
5.6 POs benefit from
improved alignment
between donors and
application of “good
donorship” principles
% of partners that have
basket funds
10 %
(671/59)
15 % (X/X) 20 % (X/X) Memorandum of
Understanding
12 % (7/59)72
% of partners that have more
than 4 donors
66 %
(39/59)
50 % (X/X) 70 % (X/X) Financial reports 12 % (7/59)73
87
74 Diak: 0,8 % (1/12) (FORCOM); IBIS: 23 % (3/13) (IESE, Kukumbi, OAM); Oxfam: 23 % (5/22) (CIP, GMD, FM, FTI, PSCM-PS); WE: 31 % (4/13) (UNAC, Livaningo, CTV, OMR) 75 Diak: 0, 8 % (1/12) (LDH); IBIS: 38 % (5/13) (CAICC; IESE, OAM; KUKUMBI; SEKELEKANI); OXFAM 100 % (22/22); WE 46 %(6/13) (OMR, JA!, CTV, Udeba-Lab, Abiodes, AENA) 76 This number is for 2013. 6 Planning & Reporting, 5 Gender 77 At least 4 per group. The groups are: Financial, Planning & reporting, Gender and Capacity building (new 2015) 78 4 financial, 4 planning and reporting, 4 gender 79 Consultative Meeting (AGIR PARTNERs ANNUAL MEETING), Health Fair
% of POs that benefit from
regular (at least one per
semester) donor meetings
22% (13/59) 50% (X/X) 75% (X/X) Donor meeting minutes 20% (12/59)74
# of partners producing only
one plan/budget and reports
to their donors
58 %
(34/59)
65 % (X/X) 75 % (X/X) POs plans and reports 58 % (34/59)75
5.7 The intermediate (IPOs)
increase coordination
between themselves
# of ICC´s realized over the
year
4 4/year 4/year Meeting reports 3
# of technical group
meetings held
1176 Annual:
16/year77
Cumulative:
55
Annual:
16/year
Cumulative:
90
Minutes and reports Annual: 1278
Cumulative: 23
# joint public events annually
and jointly held by the IPOs
7 Annual: 3
Cumulative:
15
Annual: 3
Cumulative:
18
Reports Annual: 279
Cumulative: 9
88
8.5. CRONOGRAMA DE ACTIVIDADES DAS IPOs (IBIS, DIAKONIA, OXFAM E WE)] PARA 2015
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
Coordenação entre as
intermediárias/IPOs
Intermediárias/
IPOs
aumentam a
coordenação
entre si
Estabelecidos e
implementados
mecanismos
funcionais de
coordenação
entre as
intermediárias
Realizar 4 sessões do Comité de
Coordenação das
intermediárias/IPOs (ICC)
X X X X Intermediárias/IP
Os
ICCs realizados
conforme o
planificado.
Actualizar o Quadro de Resultados
(Results Framework) da Proposta
Conjunta (Overarching) do AGIR II
X X Intermediárias Processo iniciado, mas
ainda por ser
concluído (face às
notas dos doadores,
do primeiro trimestre
de 2016).
Finalização do Overarching
Proposal do AGIR II, depois dos
últimos comentários dos Doadores
X Intermediárias/IP
Os
Processo iniciado, mas
ainda por ser
concluído (face às
notas dos doadores,
do primeiro trimestre
de 2016).
Realizar encontros dos grupos
técnicos
(Planificação/Monitoria/Resultados,
Género, Finanças)
X X X X Grupos Técnicos
das
intermediárias/IP
Os
Os encontros foram
realizados, sempre
que se julgou
necessário. Os
atinentes à
Monitoria/Resultados
não foram realizados
conforme se previa,
pela demora na
contratação do
overarching oficial de
monitoria.
89
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
Finalise the common AGIR criteria
on small funding mechanisms
X ICC Finalizado, mas
somente no terceiro
trimestre, devido às
aturadas discussões
entre as IPOs e aos
comentários dos
doadores.
Develop joint strategy on
sustainability, including exit and
weaning principles and procedures
X ICC Não iniciado, por
conta do processo de
fecho do AGIR I e do
arranque do AGIR II.
Remarcado para o
primeiro semestre de
2016.
Desenvolvida e
mantida a
identidade e
imagem pública
do programa
AGIR
Contratar um Assessor de
Comunicação das Intermediárias
X Intermediárias/IP
Os
Com a demora no
processo de
aprovação do AGIR,
tal acabou iniciando
somente no IV
trimestre de 2015, pelo
que foi replanificado
para conclusão no
primeiro trimestre de
2016.
Realizar o Partner Satisfaction Test X Intermediárias/IP
Os, com apoio
de Consultor(a)
Externo(a)
Discussões sobre
‘como proceder’,
alinhando o approach
do AGIR aos das IPOs,
enquanto entidades
independentes,
acabaram
concorrendo para
que o processo fosse
somente iniciado no
90
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
IV trimestre e
conclusão
reprogramada para I
semestre de 2016.
Realizar Fórum Consultivo Anual do
AGIR
X Intermediárias/IP
Os
Realizado conforme
planificado,
nomeadamente na
segunda metade de
Outubro, em
Quelimane, Zambézia.
Pela primeira vez, o
Fórum Consultivo
Anual foi realizado
back-to-back com
outro evento (a Feira
de Saúde), que juntou
rights-holders e duty
bearers.
Produzir e distribuir newsletter do
Programa AGIR (PlataformAGIR)
X X X X Intermediárias/IP
Os
No lugar de quatro
edições, foram
produzidas e
distribuídas somente
três. Uma falha na
coordenação, aliada
ao atraso verificado
na contratação do
overarching oficial de
comunicação,
concorreu para o
efeito.
Criação do website do AGIR X Intermediárias/IP
Os
O processo acabou se
alastrando até ao final
do ano de 2015, sem
que fosse concluso. As
discussões sobre que
91
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
tipo de website em
concreto (com apoio
de especialistas)
acabaram se
lastrando por demais,
ao que se ajuntou a
necessidade de
acertos orçamentais
por parte das IPOs,
por os custos reais
terem superado os
que tinham sido
orçados. Finalização
remarcada, assim,
para o primeiro
semestre de 2016.
Disseminar a brochura dos
resultados do Programa AGIR I
X X Intermediárias/IP
Os
As brochuras foram
produzidas e
disseminadas.
Formações/Activi
dades Conjuntas
Feira de Saúde X Intermediárias/IP
Os, sob a
coordenação
do Grupo de
Género
Realizada na segunda
metade de Outubro,
back-to-back com o
Fórum Consultivo
Anual do AGIR, em
Quelimane, Zambézia.
Formação em Género e HIV X X Intermediárias/IP
Os, sob a
coordenação
do Grupo de
Género
Tendo em conta que
os POs se achavam
em posições diversas
(exemplo: umas com
políticas relevantes,
outras sem políticas,
etc.), o Grupo Técnico
discutiu a
harmonização das
intervenções, após o
92
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
que cada IPO assistiu
os POs sob sua
alçada. Em 2016, será
oferecido um
treinamento
abrangente/moldes
clássicos, e mais
especializado
[metodologia do FRAS
(Fair Resource
Allocation System).
Formação em Advocacia para
Mudança/Policy Dialogue
X Intermediárias/IP
Os
Não realizada, por
conta o início efectivo
tardio do AGIR II, mais
a demora na
contratação do
overarching oficial de
comunicação do
AGIR.
Balanço Anual do Programa X Intermediárias/IP
Os
Realizado por todas as
IPOs, com seus POs,
no quadro do
princípio de mutual
accountability e
como parte dos seus
[IPOs] sistemas de
gestão de parcerias e
prestação de contas.
Por outro lado, as IPOs
mantiveram, com oa
doadores do AGIR
(Dezembro de 2015), o
Annual Review
Meeting, no qual
foram abordadas
93
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
questões do domínio
overarching do AGIR.
As actividades
e serviços do
programa são
de boa
qualidade e
os programas
são cost-
efficient
Desenvolvido e
mantidos
mecanismos de
coordenação do
programa com
outras iniciativas e
instituições do
governo
Continuação do trabalho com
outros mecanismos (IREX, KEPA,
DIALOGO, CEP, MASC e CAP-
FHI360, OSISA) para a conclusão e
disseminação dos resultados do
estudo sobre sustentabilidade
X X Intermediárias/IP
Os, com
liderança [onde
aplicável] da
Oxfam e da
Diakonia
Realizado. Isso incluiu
a realização de 3
mesas-redondas e 1
evento de
Desenvolvimento
Profissional para a
disseminação de 3
Estudos sobre o apoio
da Sociedade Civil:
Estudo sobre
Sustentabilidade das
OSCs no qual também
participaram a
Diakonia e Oxfam,
Road Map das OSCs
pela EU; e Enabling
Environment pela
JOINT e CIVICUS
Assinados MoU com relevantes duty
bearers e/ou parceiros estratégicos
(media, outros mecanismos de
apoio à sociedade civil, etc.).
X X IPOs Parte significativa dos
MoUs com relevantes
duty bearers e entes
estratégicos (media)
foram firmados em
2015 [exemplos:
Ministério do Género,
Criança e Acção
Social; Ministério de
Ciência e Tecnologia,
Ensino Superior e
Técnico Profissional;
Grupo SOICO;
Associação Nacional
dos Municípios
(ANAM); governos
94
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
províncias da
Zambézia e de
Nampula, etc.] ,
sendo que os não
estabelecidos
naquele ano
(exemplo: com os
governos provinciais
de Tete e Cabo
Delgado e com os
Ministérios da
Administração Estatal
e Função Pública e da
Educação e
Desenvolvimento
Humano) sê-lo-ão em
2016.
Sistemas de
Monitoria e
Controlo de
Qualidade do
Trabalho
Estabelecidos
Relatórios das
visitas de
monitoria.
Contratação de um Oficial de
Monitoria e Avaliação das
Intermediárias/IPOs
X Intermediárias/IP
Os. Oxfam na
liderança
Processo iniciado
somente no IV
trimestre, tendo a
conclusão sido
reprogramada para o
I trimestre de 2016.
Atraso se deveu aos
desafios atinentes ao
arranque efectivo
demorado do AGIR II
e ao processo de
fecho do AGIR I.
Elaboração da Linha de Base
Conjunta
X X Intermediárias/IP
Os, sob a
coordenação
dos Grupos
Técnicos
Não-aprovação
formal/definitiva dos
proposals dalgumas
IPOs concorreu para
que tal não fosse
materialmente
possível em 2015.
95
ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO
OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS
ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015
TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE
NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO
T1 T2 T3 T4
Actividade
reprogramada para o
primeiro semestre de
2016, com o apoio de
especialistas externos.
Desenho e actualização dos Planos
de Acção de seguimento das
recomendações das auditorias e
avaliação institucional (Moore
Stephens)
X X X X IPOs Acção
tempestivamente
atendida pelas IPOs,
em coordenação
com os doadores do
AGIR, por via da EoS
(lead donor).
Visitas de monitoria aos POs X X X X IPOs No geral, todas as
IPOs realizaram as
visitas de monitoria
conforme planificado
e em linha com os
seus sistemas de
gestão de parcerias.
As [IPOs] que o
fizeram parcialmente,
relevantes motivos se
acham insertos nos
seus relatórios anuais
[2015] individuais.
96
8.6. LIST OF POS AND FUNDS TO POS IN 2015
IBIS Partner organization
Focus Area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)
Disbursements 2015
%
first disbursement
1st semester 2nd semester
1 ACDH · Promotion of citizenship, human rights 1,990,190 423,627 1,431,121 93% 28/01/2015
2 AMCS · Media Sector(women journalists) 1,204,819 273,594 914,799 99% 28/01/2015
3 CAICC · Media sector (Strengthen the network of Community ICT for Good Governance)
2,484,609 596,582 1,687,450 92%
28/01/2015
4 CEC · Communication and Policy; Gender and Human Rights;
1,597,089 378,22 1,142,765 95%
28/01/2015
5 CESAB · environment and access to information 367,977 318,856 - 87% 02/02/2015
6 CODD · Promotion of citizenship, human rights, environment and access to information
1,204,819 219,213 906,995 93%
02/02/2015
7 GDI · Transparency and Duty Bearers Accountability; 1,987,687 745,039 1,127,813 94% 28/01/2015
· strengthening of local governance
8 IESE · Transparency and Duty Bearers Accountability (Social, Political, Economy and Development)
1,863,457 - 2,124,222 114%
27/05/2015
9 KUKUMBI · Governance monitoring, natural disasters, HIV and Aids, education
2,236,148 847,22 1,248,975 94%
26/01/2015
97
10 MISA · Media sector (Governance and Democracy) - 203,221 629,086 #VALUE!
Direct Payments addressed by Ibis
11 OAM · Human Rights Based Organization(quality and coverage of public services)
2,069,438 342,936 1,381,485 83%
28/01/2015
12 SEKELEKANI · Democracy and Governance 2,109,120 455,848 1,740,958
104%
19/01/2015
· Mass Media and ICTs
· Natural Resources and Environment
13 Solidariedade Moz
· Governance and Extractive Industry 746,13 - 436,965 59%
10/08/2015
· Climate Change
TOTAL 19,861,483 4,804,356 14,772,634 99%
WE EFFECT Partner organization
Focus Area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)
Disbursements 2015
1st semester 2nd semester
1 AAAJC · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
2 ABIODES · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 14/05/2015
· Environment and climate change
3 AENA · Land rights and NR 1,400,000.00 840,000.00 560,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
· Agriculture and right to food
· Environment and climate change
4 AMA · Land rights and NR 850,000.00 500,000.00 350,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
· Agriculture and right to food
· Environment and climate change
5 AMPCM · Agriculture and right to food 800,000.00 500,000.00 300,000.00 100% 14/05/2015
· Environment and climate change
6 CTV · Land rights and NR 2,100,000.00 1,400,000.00 700,000.00 100% 07/05/2015
· Environment and climate change
7 JA · Land rights and NR 2,100,000.00 1,400,000.00 700,000.00 100% 03/04/2015
98
· Environment and climate change
8 Livaningo · Land rights and NR 1,000,000.00 600,000.00 400,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
· Environment and climate change
9 OMR · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
· Agriculture and right to food
10 ORAM · Land rights and NR 1,600,000.00 900,000.00 700,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
· Agriculture and right to food
· Environment and climate change
11 UDEBA- LAB · Environment and climate change 1,025,000.00 600,000.00 425,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
12 UNAC · Land rights and NR 2,850,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,350,000.00 100% 31/03/2015
· Agriculture and right to food
13 UPCT · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 16/04/2015
· Agriculture and right to food
TOTAL 17,325,000.00 10,240,000.00 7,085,000.00 100%
OXFAM Partner Organization
Focus area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)
Disbursements 2015
1st Semester 2nd Semester
Key partners cat A
1 CIP Budget monitoring, and tracking 5,296,746 2,276,701 3,027,726 100% 10/06/2015
2 WLSA Gender and SRHR 4,551,891 883,366 3,680,628 100% 17/04/2015
3 LAMBDA LGBTI and Gender and SRHR 4,138,083 673,428 3,487,578 101% 24/06/2015
4 Forum Mulher Gender inequality/ reduced GBV and and SRHR 4,965,699 2,519,245 2,466,406 100% 24/06/2015
5 Estamos Budget monitoring, and tracking, Social audits, CSCards, Basic Public Services (health, water)
2,241,662 0 3,861,040 172%
29/07/2016
6 NWETI Gender and SRHR 4,965,699 1,994,075 2,988,346 100% 19/06/2015
26,159,780 8,346,815 19,511,725 106%
99
Key partners cat B
7 AKILIZETHO Social audits, Community Score Cards 2,490,736 1,330,997 1,162,626 100% 29/06/2015
8 GMD Tax justice 1,868,052 1,145,740 1,336,217 133% 21/05/2015
9 RENSIDA PLHIV 1,903,518 1,158,840 756,398 101% 29/06/2015
10 HOPEM Gender inequality/ reduced GBV, SRHR 3,144,943 1,595,510 1,550,703 100% 19/06/2015
11 PNDH Human Rights 1,369,905 762,376 609,973 100% 19/06/2015
(non-discrimination/legal framework)
12 FACILIDADE Budget monitoring, and tracking, Social audits, CSCards, Basic Public Services (health, water)
1,494,442 0 1,443,876 97%
19/08/2015
13 RUTH Basic Public Services (public transport, water and sanitation)
1,245,368 0 0 0%
-
14 MAGARIRO Basic Public Services (public transport, water and sanitation)
1,655,233 1,679,474 0 101%
19/06/2015
15 AMME Gender inequality/ underlying causes, SRHR 1,245,368 0 1,232,624 99% 17/07/2015
16 NAFEZA Gender inequality/ underlying causes, SRHR 871,758 572,87 305,124 101% 24/06/2015
17,289,321 8,245,808 8,397,541 96%
Key partners cat C
17 JOINT Laws and international commitments 1,324,186 0 2,221,266 168% 29/07/2015
18 PSCM-PS Basic Public Services (social protection), Human Rights 2,069,041 1,190,338 884,314 100% 19/06/2015
(non-discrimination/legal framework) 29/06/2015
19 FTI Basic Public Services (social protection), Elderly people 1,241,425 629,804 617,38 100% 19/06/2015
20 WADZAFICA Gender inequality/ reduced GBV, SRHR 1,241,425 687,53 561,805 101% 24/06/2015
21 Sociedade Aberta
Social audits, CSCards, Complaint boxes, Basic Public Services (health, water)
996,294 606,532 396,62 101%
19/06/2015
22 CEMO social research 413,808 419,866 0 101% 29/07/2015
7,286,180 3,534,071 4,681,385 113%
100
TOTAL 50,735,281 20,126,693 32,590,651 104%
DIAKONIA Partner organization
Focus Area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)
Disbursements 2015
1st semester 2nd semester
1 ACAMO · Human rights focused on people with special needs
2,385,000 1,192500 1,192500 100%
00-04-2015
2 FORCOM · Political and democratic participation 2,385,000
1,192,500
1,192500
94% 30-04-2015
· SRHR
3 LDH · Human rights 4,535,000
0
0 0%
NA · Inclusive citizenship
· Research
4 P. Juvenil · Youth rights and priorities 2,385,000
1,192,500
1,192,500 100%
08-04-2015
· SRHR
5 AMMCJ · Political advocacy 1,985,000
992,500
992,500 100%
14-04-2015 · Legal assistance for vulnerable groups
6 CEDE · Research, governance and democracy, human rights
2,004,891
992,500
1,012,391
100%
21-07-2015
· Conflict transformation,
· Civic education and electoral procedures
7 CESC · Monitoring of public policies 1,985,000 992,500 992,500 100% 18-04-2015
8 MULEIDE · Gender equality 2,118,884
992,500
1,126,384 100%
08-04-2015 · SRHR and HIV/AIDS
· Legal Assistance and dissemination of laws
9 Rede CAME · Rights of children and their welfare 1,985,000 992,500 992,500 100% 08-04-205
10 Rede da Criança · Rights of children and their welfare 2,012,326
992,500
992,500
100% 14-04-2015
11 AWEPA · Strengthening parliamentary democracy 1,685,000 0 0 100% NA
101
12 O. Eleitoral · Electoral processes, including voter registration, campaigns and the vote count, and civic education
1,685,000
421,250
605,132 61%
14-04-2015
13 ACABE · Monitoring of public policies and human rights. 650,000
325,000
325,000 100%
27-07-2015 · Education for young girls
· HIV and AIDS
14 NANA · Environment
650,000
325,000
325,000 100%
17-09-2015
· Health services (SRHR) and HIV/ AIDS
· Monitoring of public policies and human rights.
· Education and governance
15 OTHOKO · Monitoring of public policies and human rights. 717,809
325,000
392,809 100%
16-09-2015 · SRHR
· HIV and AIDS
16 AMUDZA · Rights of women and young girls 220,000
0
0 0%
NA · SRHR
· Community health
17 ADEMUM · Gender equality
110,000
0
0 0%
NA
· SRHR
· HEALTH
· EDUCATION
· Environment
· NUTRITION AND FOOD SECURITY
TOTAL 29,498,910 10,928,750 11,226,642 97.3%
i Orçamento do Estado de Moçambique cresce em 2015 para 6315 milhões de dólares, 2016, http://www.macauhub.com.mo/pt/category/noticias/, 22/03/16, 12:15:00