1
Administrators Academy
September 13, 2006
2
Our Charge
To fundamentally improve the quality of the interaction between each teacher and each student in order to create critical thinkers prepared to participate in a
complex and diverse society
3
• Districts that unrelentingly focus on their core business of student performance, create and implement coherent strategies around this core and array all elements of the district to drive and support improved classroom instruction.
4
• Improved learning
• Each child
• Each teacher
• Each administrator
• No exceptions
• No excuses
5
CST Test Results- Spring 2006
2 + 5 = 7
9 x 23 = 1,863
56 98+124 278 261.38
21/5489
54,213 – 35,910= 18,303
2x + 8 = 12 x = 2
4x2 = 8x-3 x = 1/2 X2 + 2x + 1
x2 - 1= 3
??
?
???
???
6
Looking at Local District 6….
7
Historically……
8
District 6 CST Language Arts% of Students Proficient & Advanced
2001-2006
11 12 914 15 17
33
2417 20 17
1213 11 8 7 8 9 9 11 9
2317 21
18
33
1918 1720
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Or…. For ALL GRADES….An average of 2% growth
For Proficient & Advanced StudentsIn Language Arts In Each Year
From 2001-2006
9
19.5
32.6
43.5
6.89
12.6
5.4 6.4 7.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Elementary Middle HS
District 6 CST Mathematics% of Students Proficient & Advanced
2002-2006
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Or…. For ALL GRADES….An average of 2.1% growth
For Proficient & Advanced StudentsIn Mathematics In Each Year
From 2002-2006
10
11
12
• Improved learning
• Each child
• Each teacher
• Each administrator
• No exceptions
• No excuses
13
14
15
16
• Each child
17
• The joy of learning
18
English Language ArtsCST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
3320
3324
17 20 17 18 17 1915
2622
14 1913
1926
18 14
0102030405060708090
100
2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th
Grade
Per
cent 2004-2005
2005-2006
19
MathematicsCST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
50 47 4334
1216
2835
4443
1718
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th
Grade
Pe
rce
nt
2004-2005
2005-2006
20
• Each teacher
21
• First teaching is the key.
22
MathematicsCST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
3 3
19 18
3 315 11
0102030405060708090
100
Grade/ Math Area
Perc
en
tag
e
2004-2005
2005-2006
# of s
tuden
ts-1
766
# of s
tuden
ts-9
83
# of s
tuden
ts-1
55
# of s
tuden
ts-3
85
# of students
23
Algebra ICST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
4 5 5 410 5 4 5
0
20
40
60
80
100
8th 9th 10th 11th
Grade
Per
cen
t
2004-2005
2005-2006
2280 students 2606 students 1026 students 305 students
# of students
24
• Each administrator
25
• It’s about our instructional leadership.
26
GeometryCST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
177
2 1
23
3 1 00
102030405060708090
100
8th 9th 10th 11th
Grade
Per
cen
t
2004-2005
2005-2006
235 students 1573 students 1949 students 893 students
# of students
27
Algebra IICST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
2517
49 9
20
102030405060708090
100
9th 10th 11th
Grade
Per
cen
t
2004-2005
2005-2006
318 students 500 students 680 students
# of students
28
• No exceptions
• No excuses
29
ScienceCST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
2
26
1
168 7 13
2 1 7 2
54
11 7 5104
49
0102030405060708090
100
5th, S
cience
11th
, Earth
Sci
ence
9th, B
iolo
gy
10th
, Bio
logy
11th
,Bio
logy
10th
, Chem
istry
11th
, Chem
istry
11th
, Physi
cs
9th, I
nt.Scie
nce I
Grade, Science Area
Per
cen
t
2004-2005
2005-2006
5233
stu
dents
102
studen
ts24
50 s
tuden
ts
2279
stu
dents
332
studen
ts
995
studen
ts
1368
stu
dents
104
studen
ts
2130
stu
dents
# of students
30
History- Social ScienceCST, Spring 2006
All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced
81512 12 1820
0102030405060708090
100
8th 10th 11th
Grade
Per
cen
t
2004-2005
2005-2006
4306 students 3978 students 2586 students
# of students
31
• Improved learning
• Each child
• Each teacher
• Each administrator
• No exceptions
• No excuses
32
Taking a closer look….
33
• Reclassification goal-20%
• Increase number of students at second grade who reclassify
• Kindergarten ELD level 1-after 4 months ELD 2
• Improve CAHSEE pass rate
• Decrease Dropout rate
34
• Periodic Assessments– Language Arts 50% proficient or better– Mathematics 60% proficient or better
• CST– Language Arts 45/35% proficient or better– Mathematics 60/40% proficient or better– Algebra 1 25% proficient or better
• MCD– Reduce suspension rate– Placement of students other than SLD and SLI– Timely completion of evaluations
35
• Improved learning
• Each child
• Each teacher
• Each administrator
• No exceptions
• No excuses