Africa RISING science, innovations and technologies with scaling potential from ESA-Zambia
Christian Thierfelder (CIMMYT), Peter Setimela (CIMMYT), Munyaradzi Mutenje (CIMMYT), Mulundu Mwila (ZARI) and Mateete Bekunda (IITA)
Key messages Cropping systems based on the principles of conservation agriculture
increase yield in 2-5 cropping seasons
Labour benefits of 25-45 days can be achieved when using labour saving planting methods and weed control strategies, especially benefitting women
Increased financial returns make CA rotation and intercropping systems more profitable
25,648 households have been reached; of these 10,258 have been using CA-based practices on at least 0.25 hectares consistently; 2,116 are full adopters of all CA principles.
This poster is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. January 2017
We thank farmers and local partners in Africa RISING sites for their contributions to this research. We also acknowledge the support of all donors which globally support the work of the CGIAR centers and their partners through their contributions to the CGIAR system
Objectives and approachSmallholder farmers in Eastern Zambia are confronted with decliningsoil fertility, low access and use of improved seed and agricultureinputs. Increasingly, the negative impacts of climate variability andchange affect their farming systems.
Efforts have been made to provide cash constrained farmers withoptions in reach to improve productivity, profitability anddiversification while adapting to a changing climate.
Conservation agriculture (CA) systems, based on minimum soildisturbance, crop residue retention and crop rotations have beenpromoted from 2011-2016 in mother-and-baby trials and innovationsystems in Eastern Zambia.
Key resultsCA systems, as practiced in Eastern Zambia, showed yield benefitsacross different planting systems (Figure 1, Picture 1) but only after 2-5cropping season. Immediate financial benefits can be achieved due toreduced labour on planting and weeding (Figure 2a, Picture 2).Diversification in CA systems enhance yield benefits and increase thenutritional value of farming systems. The relative yield performance ofCA vs conventional agriculture shows greater potential for CA (Figure2b).
Significance and scaling potentialCA systems have been extended widely in Eastern Zambia by AfricaRISING and other scaling partners. Specific components of the system(e.g. herbicides and animal traction ripping) are currently adopted veryrapidly. Due to Governmental buy-in and conducive policies, thetechnology has been increasingly institutionalized and mainstreamed.CA provides a base of synergy with other SI innovations (e.g. doubled-up legume and intercropping systems) but options have to be adaptedto site and farmer circumstances to overcome barriers to adoption andto achieve behavior change for more sustained uptake.
b
abab
a
b
abab
a
b
ab ab
a
b
abab
a
b
ab
a
b
ab
a
b
aba
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Rid
ge/F
urr
ow
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, M
z/C
p in
terc
rop
CA
-DS
, M
z-C
p r
ota
tion
Rid
ge/F
urr
ow
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, M
z/C
p in
terc
rop
CA
-DS
, M
z-C
p r
ota
tion
Rid
ge/F
urr
ow
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, M
z/C
p in
terc
rop
CA
-DS
, M
z-C
p r
ota
tion
Rid
ge/F
urr
ow
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, m
aiz
e
CA
-DS
, M
z/C
p in
terc
rop
CA
-DS
, M
z-C
p r
ota
tion
Rid
ge/F
urr
ow
, m
aiz
e
CA
- R
ipp
er,
ma
ize
CA
- R
ipp
er,
MZ
-Sb r
ota
tion
Rid
ge/F
urr
ow
, m
aiz
e
CA
- R
ipp
er,
ma
ize
CA
- R
ipp
er,
MZ
-Sb r
ota
tion
Rid
ge/F
urr
ow
, m
aiz
e
CA
-Direct
seed
er,
ma
ize
CA
-Direct
seed
er,
Mz-S
b r
ota
tion
Chanje Mtaya Kafumbwe Vuu Kawalala Hoya Kapara
Ma
ize
gra
in y
ield
(k
g/h
a)
Manual systems Animal traction systems
CP-maize CA-maize CA-maize/legume
La
bo
ur
da
ys
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
2nd Weeding
Land clearing
Ridging
Sowing
Mulch appl.
Basal fertilizer appl.
Herbicide appl.
1st Weeding
3rd Weeding
Top dressing
Harvesting
Maize grain yield under
conventional agriculture (kg ha-1
)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Maiz
e g
rain
yile
d u
nd
er
conserv
ation a
griculture
(kg h
a-1
)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Figure 1: Maize grain yield in different CA systems in seven target communities of Eastern Zambia, 2014
Picture 1: Performance of CA (left) and conventional agriculture on farmer’s fields (right), Kawalala Camp, Eastern Zambia, February 2015
Figure 2a-b, Picture 2: Labour savingscan be achieved when practicing CA (topleft) to avoid manual ridging (top right).
The relative yield performance of CA vsconventional agriculture in EasternZambia (bottom right) from 2011-2016.Dots above the 1:1 line are morebeneficial for CA.
Ph
oto
cre
dit
: C. T
hie
rfe
lder
Ph
oto
cre
dit
: C. T
hie
rfe
lder