Bmepo!Tjobhb-! Btobi-!!!Bob!Bsjgbuvt boe!Xbsufs!Bhvtujn
Qsftfoufe!!po!7ui BQFBFO!!Joufsobujpobm!Dpogfssfodf . Qijmj qqjoft
Indonesian Demands of Food
DpnnpejujftDpotvnqujpo!)111 u *
Jnqpsut!)111 u *
Jnqpsut!Sbujp!up!D uj )&*)111!upot* )111!upot* Dpotvnqujpo!)&*
Sjdf 44611 3861 9
Tpzcfbo 4211 2958 71
Tvhbs 6611 3811 29
Xifbu 6611 6611 211
Dpso 29911 3179 22
Tubujtujdt Cpbse pg Joepoftjb )3123*Tubujtujdt!Cpbse!pg!Joepoftjb!)3123*
Indonesian Demands of Food Indonesian Demands of Food Based on 2010 data, Population growth 1 49%/yr Rice Consumption rates 1,49%/yr, Rice Consumption rates 125,3kg/hh/yr, production growth 3% /yr Need to Imports Rice,p , Best Scenario is DECREASING population to 1,3%/yr, with Rice Consumption rates ,3 /y , p125,3kg/hh/yr, INCREASING production growth 1,56% /yr
Indonesian Demands of Energy
INDUSTRIES
TRANSPORTATION
Agricultural Negative Growth has shown by : D i b f f (f f ili ) Decreasing number of farmer (farmer familiy) Decrasing size of land ownership Increasing number of agricultural products import Decreasing number of Students enrollment on Decreasing number of Students enrollment on Agricultural fields Decreasing number of School which offering Decreasing number of School which offering agricultural majorI i f b i ti Increasing of urbanization
Decreasing Number of Farmer Food Food 2003 = 18.708.052 hh 2013 = 17.728.185 hh
Horticulture 2003 = 16.937.617 hh 2013 10 602 147 hh 2013 = 10.602.147 hh
Decreasing Number of Farmer Animal Animal 2003 = 18.595.824 hh 2013 = 12.969.210 hh
Plantation 2003 = 14.138.539 hh 2013 12 770 090 hh 2013 = 12.770.090 hh
Land Ownership A l d d h /hh Average land owned = 0,925 ha/hh
Decreasing size of land ownership Farmer with < 0,5 ha (GUREM) = 14.248.864 in 2013 decreased 25,07% (from 2003) Farmer with > 0,5 ha = 25.751.267 in 2013 decreased 15,35% (from 2003) dec eased 5,35% ( o 003)
Low Income Based on 2013 Agriculture National 3 gCencuse farmer house hold earning : 26.561.080 IDR/yr = 2.250 US$/yr =
6 PHP/97.690 PHP/yr Farmer Getting Older Based on 2012 Ministry Agriculture data, farmer average age : 55, > 6,5 million farmers are on the age group of 45‐54 yo
Decreasing number of School which offering agricultural majoroffering agricultural major Agricultural training Institution = only 112 over 18.190 (0.6%) On East Java = only 17 over 2.983 (0.5%) From 17 institution there is only 3 which confirmed still on businessco ed st o bus ess
Decreasing of Students Enrollment on agricultural fieldsagricultural fields Agrocomplex has been choosen only by 12% stundents whose enrolled on public university 60% of those (12%) has put it as second option Composition of HR on agricultural 0,1% Graduates, 0,2% high School dan 7% Vocational G aduates, 0, % g Sc oo da 7% ocat o aSchool
Increasing Number of Urbanization ; % b i 31% urban in 1990
45% urban in 2000 50% urban in 2012(ADB 2013) (ADB 2013)
Need to challange preception that says : F i f ld d t d l Farmer is for elder non educated people Farmer is poor Farming system cannot ensuring income Farmer is low technology and far away from Farmer is low technology and far away from inovation Farmer is not “cool” Farmer is not cool
(1) Showed agriculture vast opportunities, (2) Payload great technology (2) Payload great technology, (3) Ease to access resource and information,
b l d d k (4). Ability to manage and reduce risk.
Source of Information Updated Technology Updated Technology Information transfer ability Adequate learning facilities Adequate learning facilities Incubator to Practices Networks to Technology and Market Networks to Technology and Market Ensuring Market Exposing OpportunitiesExposing Opportunities
(1) Education Institution(information transfer learning facilities)(information, transfer, learning facilities)
(2) Research and development Institution (t h l )(technology)
(3) Business Institution( k k i l i f ili i d (networks, market, practices, learning facilities and opportunities)
Element Included on UNITRI entrepreneurial education programeducation program the concept of entrepreneurship education (theoretical approach), comparative studies (comparisons), extraction of entrepreneurial ideas, the concept of product development and business the concept of product development and business planning
The developed program named AGROPRENEURSHIP has develop to take the AGROPRENEURSHIP has develop to take the agricultural HR challenge,
Agropreneurship contains activities g p p (1) recruitment and selection of interest, (2) training and product extraction, (2) training and product extraction, (3) the preparation of a business plan, (4) the implementation of the business plan, (4) the implementation of the business plan, (5) marketing and (6) strengthening the business (continuity)(6) strengthening the business (continuity)
After Implemented there are Demands to Measure implication of AGROPRENEURSHIP Measure implication of AGROPRENEURSHIP
The Study is intended to measure the f f hiperformance of an Agropreneurship
programs. p g
(1) Determine the gross enrollment rate (GER) of students in each phase of of students in each phase of Agropreneurship,
h l l h h(2) Determine the critical point along the phase of agropreneurshipg p p
(3) Determine the performance of agropreneurship program and agropreneurship program and
(4) Comparing the GER of agropreneurship program with the conventional programprogram with the conventional program.
Phase 2 : A iAgroinvent
Phase 1 : Agropreneurship
Developing Material C i ll Curricullum Training Handbook▪ cultivated cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)▪ cultivated Philodendron selloum▪ cultivated probiotic broiler
Invitation and information Posters
Training Hand Book
Training Hand Book
Training Hand Book
Selected 117 young people (students), i fi ld i ( i lt i i various field science (agriculture, engineering,
economics, administration, accounting) Various level of study (vocational high school, polytechnic and university) Selected from 168 registrant
Explore : passion, motivation and p ,backgrounds
Training has done by BAI (private agriculture R&D institution) and SAB (training and R&D institution) and SAB (training and agribusiness institution) Put High Technology in simple way as an Approach Show students information gateway
Training done by BAI
Training done SAB (on Field Training)
Field Trip to The PuspaAgro – Primary Agricultural MarketAgricultural Market
Developing Business Plan
Interdiciplinary Team Work Creativity Creativity
Goal Orientation Focus
Communication
Interdiciplinary Team Work Exit Plan Response Exit Plan Response
Hard WorkResponsibility Responsibility
Product Development Production System Development Production System Development Indoagroinvent
h d Sharing and Expose
Gross Enrollment RateE j uj 0 Qi O c g HEftdsjqujpo!0!Qibtft Ovncfs!pg!
Tuvefou!Fospmmfe
Hsptt!
Fospmmnfou!Sbuf!
)HFS*!)&*) * ) *
Usbjojoh!boe!Gjfme!Usjq!Qbsujdjqbout 228 211&
Cvtjoftt!Qmbo!Qsfqbsbujpo 95&
Cvtjoftt!Qmbo!Jnqmfnfoubujpo! 8:&
Nbslfujoh 49&
Cvtjoftt!Dpoujovjuz!)Ofx!Cvtjoftt* 2:&
Lies in the final phases of MARKETING D d % (GER % MARKETING Decreased 52% (GER 70% 38%), and BUSINESS CONTINUITY Decreased 50% (GER 38% 19%)
Lack of knowledge and experience and courage is an important key that causes participation dropped dramatically at marketing execution phase causes participation dropped dramatically at marketing execution phase
Performance E j j 0 B B TEftdsjqujpo 0 Btqfdut Bwfsbhf Tdpsf
Nbufsjbm 5-6Nbufsjbm 5-6
Sfdfodz pg Nbuufs 5-8
Qbsujdjqbou Fyqfdubujpo 5-6
Qbsujdjqbou Dpogjefodf 5-2
GER Comparison :1&
71&
81&
91&
51&
61&
71&311:
3121
3122
21&
31&
41&3122
3123
3124
B i1&
21&
Cvtjoftt!Qmbo!Q uj
Cvtjoftt!Qmbo!J m u uj
Nbslfujoh Cvtjoftt!D uj ju )O
Bhspqsfofvstij q
Qsfqbsbujpo Jnqmfnfoubujpo! Dpoujovjuz!)Ofx!Cvtjoftt*
Employ triparties institution over entrepreneur course has proven can deliver entrepreneur course has proven can deliver better learning outcomes
h d l h Improving Agropreneurship model with assign more practical marketing experience g p g pwill increase the program performance.
NEXT Frontier Change the Parents MINDSET (Agrocareer Program / Phase 3)g g
Thanks to Indonesia Ministry of Education and Culturewhich has funding this Studyand Culturewhich has funding this Study
Thanks to SEARCA Travel Grants which has f d h hfunding the opportunity to presenting this reports p