CTR Symposium 13 April 2016
AN EVALUATION OF A DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERSCTR Symposium
13 April 2016
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 2
Paper Authors
Kelly Selman, P.E.District Engineer, DallasTexas Department of Transportation
Nabeel Khwaja, MS, P.E.Research EngineerCenter for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin
Dr. Randy B. Machemehl, P.E.Nasser Al-Rashid Centennial Professor in Transportation EngineeringCenter for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin
Moggan Motamed Graduate Research AssistantCenter for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin
Clair LaVayeEditorThe University of Texas at Austin
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 3
Dallas District Dallas District
– Plans, designs, builds, operates and maintains the state transportation system in seven counties: Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Kaufman, Navarro and Rockwall
– Encompasses 5,447 square miles– Lane miles of state system roadways:
10,426– Serves approximately 4.2 million people– Approximately 3.7 million registered
vehicles– Current full-time employee count: 822– Five area offices and six maintenance
offices
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 4
Overview – TxDOT DFW Construction/Development $32 billion in planning on select
regional projects $10 billion in key projects under
construction or in development regionally
$7.1 billion in key projects recently completed
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 5
I-35E at Lake Lewisville Bridge
35Express Project
Columns for I-35E at Belt Line Road New SB I-35E Bridge over FM 407
5
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 6
The Dallas Horseshoe Project
I-30 Margaret McDermott Bridge construction west of downtown Dallas
NB I-35E connection to westbound I-30 in downtown Dallas
I-35E looking north approaching downtown Dallas
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 7
The Challenge
Shortage of trained
engineers for leadership positions in
DOTs
Not enough graduates
Universities are challenged to
provide thorough grounding
DOTs have difficulty retaining engineers
Increased retirement of experienced
leaders
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 8
Background of the Dallas EA Program
Personal Experience Historical hiring of Engineering Assistants by TxDOT - 2006
– Individual offices• Summer Interns• Area Office (10 at the time)• District Design
– Less structured and more dependent on Individual supervisor and the EA• Sometimes created a barrier in EA’s development
Cross-functional experience (In lieu of ‘silos’) Progression through the ranks – Equal opportunity for Experience &
Training Leadership positions
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 9
Dallas EA Program - Overview
EA Program– Mandatory for all new EA hires (since 2009)– Uniform training and flat organizational structure – The EA’s Supervisor is the Deputy District Engineer – one
payroll unit• Quarterly group meetings + presentations • Mock interviews to develop interviewing skills• “Loaned out” to different disciplines, i.e. Design,
Construction, Traffic Operations, etc.– Do not count towards FTE allocation
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 10
Elements of the EA Program
1. Functional Area Rotations– Usually design construction traffic operations
2. Mentoring– Assigned a high-level district manager as a mentor– Mentors are not in the trainee’s direct chain of command
3. Formal classroom/online instruction– At least 3 courses per year – List includes: GeoPak, bridge construction, work zone traffic control,
watershed modeling, risk management, etc.
4. Professional Engineer (PE) Exam Prep– Expected to take PE exam after 4 years of training– EA’s given access to PE exam classes and study opportunities
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 11
Success Stories of the EA Program
Project Manager of the Dallas Horseshoe Project - $800 million DB Project
Project Delivery Engineer – Dallas District Area Engineer Assistant Area Engineers Hydraulic Section Supervisor Area Office Design Section Supervisors
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 12
Evaluation of the EA Program
Examine what DOT’s are doing to:– Recruit– Train– Retrain, and– Build leadership skills in engineering staff ranks
Procedure1. Review published information2. Conduct national survey3. Examine the Dallas TxDOT District Training Program4. Objectively evaluate the Dallas Training Program
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 13
DOT OUTREACH AND TRAINING
Summer Internships Partnerships with universities DOT Training Programs
– At least 21 DOTs offer/require training
Variability across DOTs:• 61% provide mentoring• 100% rotate trainees through
functional areas• Most DOTs do NOT require
training for ALL new hires
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 14
SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS
Training Mentorship Mandatory Training?
Rotation?
Total “YES” 14 14 2 11
Total “NO” 7 10 7 0
Total Responses 21 24 9 11
Training programs range from 19 weeks up to 4 years
Average duration = 2.3 years
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 15
EA PROGRAM PARTICIPANT PE EXAM PASS RATE
October 2014 Texas Board of Professional Engineers Transportation Discipline Pass Rate = 48%
Bayesian analysis of TxDOT EA pass rate– Bayesian analysis gives us a way to “update” a probability
estimate (here, 48% pass) in light of evidence (in this case, Dallas District survey results)
– Results indicate an 89% chance that those who complete the program will pass
TxDOT EA’s program participants have almost twice the likelihood of passing compared to the general population
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 16
Time to Licensure• On average, pass at the
end of fourth year
• Those with previous experience became licensed in < 2 years
• Those who did not participate take 6.74 years on average
EA Program BenefitTime to Licensure
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 17
EA Program Benefit: Participant Mean Job Progress (Promotion) Rates
Progress Mean of Total
Progress Mean 2000-2007
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8 0.7550.721
0.435 0.452Employee with Train-ingEmployee without Training
Pro
gres
s R
ate
For 117 total engineers– 49 with training, and – 68 without training
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 18
Survey of Dallas Engineers
77 total responses– 32 Training program
graduates – 14 currently active in program – 32 did not participate in the
training program
Questions addressed:– Employee job satisfaction– Professional growth
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 19
Survey of Dallas Engineers
When you began your full time job at the DOT, do you think you received the training you needed to do your job
well?Do you have opportunities for professional
growth within TxDOT?
When you began your full time job at TxDOT, do you think you received the training you needed to do your job well?
Do you have opportunities for professional growth within TxDOT?
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 20
Survey of Dallas Engineers
Are you comfortable asking questions when you are in doubt?
Are you comfortable disagreeing with your supervisor when you discuss ideas?
Are you comfortable asking questions when you are in doubt?
Are you comfortable disagreeing with your supervisor when you discuss ideas?
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 21
Feedback for Improvements
Leadership Program – Graduates believe that a leadership program should be implemented– “We arrived trained in engineering, but we have to learn management.”– More customization of rotation progression– Helps to have upper-level managers responsible for rotation to avoid delay
Mentoring– Formalize the mentoring process – Add a mentor group composed of recent graduates– Allow trainees to pick a mentor from a pool
Equipment– Need to further improve access to materials and equipment
Overall, positive experience!
CTR Symposium 13 April 2016 22
Recommendations for those starting a training program
Flatten the organization structure for trainees to eliminate internal conflicts and area self-interests
Enforce rotation for trainees Customize area rotations based on potential, talents, and
interests of trainees. Monitor and standardize the number of classes taken each year