Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
163
An Update on Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
David Phillips TranSystems Corporation
Abstract
The first Curb Guided Bus (CGB) route opened in 1980. Although initial introduction of this technology was slow, six routes have opened since 1998, and more are in the works, mostly in the U.K. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the technol-ogy and its deployment.
IntroductionTheauthorhasbeenakeyparticipantintwoAlternativeAnalyseswheretheavail-ableright-of-waywidthwasveryrestricted.TokeepBusRapidTransit(BRT)asanoption,someformofguidancewouldberequiredtoensurethatbusescouldoperatereliablyinaverynarrowlane.Aliteraturesearchidentifiedseveralguidedbus technologies, but all were, and still are, in the research and developmentphase.TheexceptionwasCurbGuidedBus(CGB).However,littleinformationwasprovided.Thisisareportontheauthor’sextensiveresearchonsystemdesignandoperationforthistechnology,includingsitevisitstomostofthesystemsinopera-tion.Thesevisitsincludedmeetingswithpeopleinvolvedintheinitialtechnologyresearch, systemdesign, funding,operation,andmaintenanceof the infrastruc-tureandthevehicles.Ithasbeenconfirmedthatthistechnologyisappropriatein situationswhereevena limitedamountof right-of-way isavailableandthat
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
164
itcanbe installedwith lowrisk.Thisability tooperate innarrowrights-of-wayis especially important inconstrictedenvironments suchasmediansofarterialstreetsor freeways,onanabandonedrailroadalignmentoralongsideanactiverailroad,onbridgesorelevatedstructures, intunnels,orunderbuildings.Thesenarrowrights-of-waycanmakeitpossibletocreatededicatedtransitlaneswhereotherwisenonewouldfit.Inaddition,itwasfoundthattherearemoreadvantagestotheuseofCGBtechnology,comparedtoeitherconventional,manually-steeredBRTandotherguidedbustechnologies, thansimplythenarrowerright-of-wayconfigurations.
Figure 1. Curb Guided Bus, Adelaide
Source:TranSystems
Curb Guided Bus Sytem OperationsAmajorsurprise intheresearchwasthenumberofCGBsystems inoperation.Noneofthepreviousguidancetechnologyarticleshadmentionedmorethantwoorthreeroutes.Thereare,infact,11systemsinoperation,andthreeotherwell-
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
165
advancedfuturesystems.Sitevisitsweremadetomostofthem.Table1liststheseSystems,intheorderoftheiropeningdate.Table2listsfuturesystems.
Table 1. Curb Guided Bus Systems in Operation
1980 - Essen, GermanyFulerumerStrasse–Allofthesystem’sroutesstartedunderagovernmentdemonstrationprogram.EVAGnowoperatesa3routesystemwith3.7milesofbi-directionalguidewayin3separatesegments.Allwerepreviouslyprivateright-of-wayportionsofstreetcarroutes.Thefirstsegmentoperatesinaparklikesettingthatdemonstratedoperationthroughgradecross-ingsandona6%grade. 1983 - Essen, GermanyWittenbergstrasse–Thissectionwasthetestsiteforjointoperationofdualmodebuseswithstreet-cars.Concreteandwoodrunningsurfacesweretested.Followingthetest,asectionintunnel,sharedwithstreetcars,wasoperatedfor11years.OnlyguidedbusesoperateinWittenbergstrassenow. 1986 - Adelaide, AustraliaOperatestheworld’sfastestguidedbusway,a7.5milelonglineoperatedat100km/hr(62mph).The“O-Bahn”wasopenedintwosegments,in1986and1989.Thetwointermediatestationsaredesignedforpassing.One-minuteheadwaysareoperatedinthepeakhour. 1986 - Essen, GermanyA40Motorway–Thissectionincludesthesharpestguidedbuswaycurves(60m,about190ft.,radius),whichrequirestheEssenbusesuniquelytobeequippedwithguidewheelsateachaxle.Italsohasaramponstructurewitha6%grade.AllEssenrouteswerebuiltwithpre-castconcreteguidewaysections,whichstillprovideaverysmoothride.Essenexpectstoawardacontractforanewgenerationofguidedbuses(itsfourth)shortly. 1995 - Ipswich (Kesgrave), U.K.Thisguidedbuswayisonlyabout600ft.long,andisoperatedaspartofthe“SuperRoute66”betweenIpswichandMartleshamHeath.Theguidedbuswaysegmentisprovidedtoensurethatonlybusesusetheroadway,whichprovidesashortcutbypassingcongestedintersections. 1998 - Leeds, U.K.A61ScottHallRoadCorridor-NorthofCentralLeeds(includesatotalofonemileofguidedbusway)thisconsistsofsingle-directionbuswayslocatedalongsideparallelroads,“queuejumpers”(whichprovidepriorityaccesstoroundabouts),acontraflownon-guidedlanefortheentryintothecentercity,andsignalpriority.Thiscorridorincludesasectionona7%downgrade,thesteepestCGBoperation.RidershipontheroutesthatbenefitfromthefacilitiesprovidedinthesecorridorshasexceededtheperformanceofbusesasawholeinLeeds.
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
166
2000 - Nagoya, Japan
TheNagoyaGuidewaybus(alsoknownastheYutoritoLine)isa4-mile-longguidewayinstalled
onastructuretoseparatebusesfromregulartraffic.Thereare9stationsontheguideway
structure.AtObata-ryokuchistation,busesdescendarampandcontinueinmixedtrafficon
regularsurfaceroadstoserveNagoyasuburbs.Despitetheshortvehiclelength,guidewheels
arefittedbothatthefrontandbehindtherearaxleduetosharpcurvature.Operationsare
managedasathird-sectorcompany,andthecostofbuildingtheelevatedguidewayinfrastruc-
turewasbornebytheNagoyaCityroadsbudget.
2001 - Leeds, U.K.
York/SelbyRoads“Elite”Project-EastofCentralLeeds(1.3milesofguidedbusway),thisis
servedbybusesoftwodifferentprivateoperators,whopaidasignificantshareoftheproject’s
constructioncost.Itwasthefirstbuiltusingslipformconcreteconstruction.Theonlysection
ofbi-directionalguidewayisincluded.
2002 - Bradford, U.K.
TheManchesterRoadproject(1.4milesofguidedbusway)locatedsouthofcentralBradford
(itselfabout10mileswestofcentralLeeds)isthenewestbuswayintheLeeds-Bradfordarea.
Theguidedsectionsareallinthecenteroftheroadway,withsignalpriorityforbusesentering
themfromthecurbside.Itincludessheltersthatareintendedasartwork.
2003 - Sussex, U.K.
TwosectionsofguidedbuswayhaveopenedtodateaspartofRoute10ofthe“Fastway”
networkofhighqualitybusservicesbeingestablishedinthisareasouthofLondon.Thisiscur-
rentlytheonlyguidedbuswayprojectinwhichadedicatedfleetofbuses,indistinctivecolors
andmorestylishthanthenormfortheoperator’sstandardbuses,isemployed.OtherFastway
componentsincludehighqualitypassengershelterswithreal-timeinformation.
2004 - Edinburgh, U.K.
“Fastlink”isa0.9-mile-long,bi-directionalguidedbuswayinstalledaspartofEdinburgh
Translink’sprogramfortransitimprovements.Theguidewayincludestwooverpassesbuiltto
bypasscomplexintersectionsandroundabouts.
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
167
Table 2. Future Systems
2006 - Sussex, U.K.
ThenextsectionofguidewayisfortheFastwaysystem’sRoute20.
2008 - Cambridge-St. Ives, U.K.
Thisisexpectedbethelongestguidedbuswaysystem,consistingof11milesofguidewayto
bebuiltonanabandonedrailline.Thenationalgovernmenthascommittedtofunding.The
countyiscurrentlyconsideringdesign/buildproposalsforthisproject,whichisestimatedto
costabout$60M,atcurrentexchangerates.
2009 - Luton, U.K.
Thiswillconsistof8milesofguideway,alsotobebuiltonanabandonedrailline.Thepublic
consultationprocesshasbeencompleted,andagovernmentfundingdecisionisexpected
shortly.
Figure 2. Sussex, U.K., Fastway Bus
Source:Stevens Associates Note: Sussex,U.K.,FastwayBussystemcombinesstylishbusesandsheltersandreal-timeinforma-tionatstops,withsegmentsofguidedandconventionalbuswaytoprovidehighqualityservice.Systemwillbecompletein2006.
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
168
CGB Infrastructure and VehiclesCGBtechnologyitselfissimple,non-electronic,andnon-proprietary.Theguide-wayconsistsofconcreterunningsurfaceswithverticalcurbsabouteightincheshigh.Onallsystems,thecurbsareset2.6meters(102.4in.)apart,beingdesignedforthe2.55meter(100.4in.)widebusesthatarestandardoutsideNorthAmerica.Abi-directionalguideway,suitableforhighspeedoperationwith102inchwideNorthAmericanbuses,canbeconstructedinaright-of-wayoflessthan25feetinwidth,includinganemergencywalkwayoneachside.Thealignmentofalaneconstructedonanat-graderoutewouldrequireonlyabouta10-footright-of-way.Thisismuchnarrowerthanconventionalbuswaysdesignedformanually-steeredbuses.
Inadditiontoat-gradealignments,CGBtechnologyhasbeenappliedtoroutesinsubways.TheabilityofCGBsystemstooperatesafelyatspeedinnarrowrights-of-wayisparticularlyimportantinthesecases,whereminimizingtherequiredwidthcangreatly reducethecostofconstructing tunnels.Essenoperateddualmodebusesintunnelsfor11years.Itwasparticularlyinterestingthatthesetunnelsandsubway stations were shared with streetcars. Full block signaling was provided.Unfortunately, the pre-existing streetcar trackage used wooden ties on ballastconstruction.Thebustrackwaysinstalledexpeditiouslyaspartofthedemonstra-tionprojectwerealsowood,boltedtotheties.Overtime,thetiesandtrackwaysdeteriorated.Theoperatordidnothavetheresourcesavailabletoinstallaconcretetrackbed,asanewsystemdesignedforcombinedoperationwouldbe.Thebuseswereremoved,returningtotheirformersurfacestreetoperation.Anewsystemintendedforcombinedcouldbebuiltwithrailsembeddedinthebustrackways.Essentially,thiswouldbestandardstreetcar/LRTin-streettrackwiththeadditionofcurbs.Ofcourse,asubwaycouldbebuiltforuseonlybyCGBvehicles.
Thesameappliesonbridgesandelevatedstructures.TheNagoya,Japan,systemoperates on a four-mile-long guideway that is located entirely on an elevatedstructurelocatedinanareaofthecitywithheavytrafficcongestion.Busroutesfanoutonregularstreetswhentheyreachtheendoftheguideway.Thereareninesta-tionsontheguideway,includingtherailroadinterchangestation.CGBtechnologywasselectedbecauseofthenarrower,lowercoststructurerequirementsandthefasteroperationthatcanbepermittedcomparedtoaconventionalbusway.
ThesystemisbasedonresearchfundedbytheGermangovernmentintheearly1980s.Therearenolicensefeesinvolved.Anyonecanbuildaroadwaywithcurbs.AcomprehensivehandbookfordesignofCGBinfrastructure,basedontheexpe-
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
169
rience of the practitioners in the field, was issued in 2004. Systems around theworldutilizethesamedesignforthe“funnel”usedattheentrancetoguideways(seeFigure1).Thespeedlimitforthefunnelistypicallysetat25mph.Whereitisnecessarytoallowpedestriansorothertraffictocrossaguideway,thecurbscanbegapped.Shortgaps(lessthan10feet)cansimplybecrossed(at30mph).Longergapsrequireare-entryfunnel.Thehandbookprovidesguidanceonawidevarietyofotherdesigndetails.
Figure 3. Typical section of CGB guideway, showing potential to share with streetcars
Source: TranSystems
Similarly, any bus manufacturer can design and build guidearms for its buses.WhilebusesforCGBoperationare,essentially,standardbuses,theguidearmshavealways been designed by the bus manufacturer, with buses delivered completewith guidearms and guidewheels. CGB buses have been built by at least eight
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
170
manufacturersworldwide.ThefirstsysteminEssen,Germany,equippeditsbuseswithguidewheelsateachaxle(virtuallyallofitsbuseshavealwaysbeenthree-axlearticulateds).All subsequent systems (exceptNagoya, Japan)haveused slightlylesstightminimumcurveradii,allowingtheirbusestobeequippedwithguide-wheelsonlyatthefrontaxle,simplifyingvehicledesignissues.Allsystemsusethesamesupplierforthehorizontalguidewheels.Afterthedesignoftheguidearm/guidewheelforaparticularbustypeiscomplete,actualmanufactureandinstalla-tioncostisrelativelyminor.WiththeproliferationofCGBoperationintheU.K.,mostnewbusesarebuiltreadyforthisinstallation.
All CGB systems currently in operation are operated with diesel buses. Severalsystemshavepurchasedbuseswithextrasilencingpackages,reducingnoiseinsideand outside the vehicles. As noted above, Essen operated portions of its CGBsystemunderelectricoverheadpowerwiresformanyyears.Thisisanoptionforfutureroutes.Inthemeantime,avoidingthecostofinstallationofanelectricdis-tributionsystemgreatlyreducesthecostofanewsystemcomparedtoLRTandstreetcars.
Figure 4. CGB guideway entry funnel, Adelaide
Source:TranSystems
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
171
Figure 5. Typical guidearm/guidewheel installation— Mercedes bus in Adelaide
Source:TranSystems
CGB System OperationAkeyadvantageofCGBbuses,comparedtoLRTandstreetcars,isthatthattheycanoperateasstandardbuseswhentheyareofftheguideway.Theguidewheelsextendonlyaboutoneinchbeyondthebodyofthebus.AllCGBroutescombineguidewayandnormalon-streetoperations,avoidingthenecessityforpassengerstotransferfromafeederbustoanothervehicle.
On most systems (notably Leeds, Bradford, Sussex-UK and Essen FulerumerStrasse),guidewaysareprovidedonlyalongstreetsegmentsthatregularlyexperi-encecongestion,frequentlyonlyinonedirection,furtherreducingright-of-wayrequirements.Transitsignalpriorityisnormallyprovidedattheendoftheguide-waytofacilitatethemovementofthebusesastheyre-entermixedtrafficlanes.Speedlimitsonsectionsthatrunbesidestreetsarenormallysetatthespeedlimitoftheadjacentstreet.
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
172
Therearealsolong,high-speedsystems.Thebestexampleofthistypeisthe7.5-mile-longAdelaideO-Bahn.Thisrouteisfullygradeseparatedandhasonlytwointermediatestops.Becausetheguidewayissonarrow,therewasroomtocon-structabeautifullinearpark,withbicycleandwalkingpathsalongitsentirelength.Thespeedlimitissetat100km/h(62mph),exceptwherelimitedbycurves.
Figure 6. Paradise Interchange, Adelaide O-Bahn
Source:TranSystems
Atoneoftheintermediatestops,additionalroutesjointhebusway.Itisexpectedthatconstructionwillstartinearly2007ontheCambridge-St.IvessystemintheU.K.,whichwillhaveaguideway11mileslong,forthelongestguidedbusway.Thisisbeingprocuredasadesign-buildproject.
A key advantage of CGB guideways is that they are completely self-enforcing.Unlikeconventionalbuslanes,non-guidewheelequippedvehiclescannotoperateonthem.Somesectionsofguidewayhavebeeninstalledspecificallyforthisrea-son;theyareshortcutsthatcanaccommodatetherelativelylowvolumeofbusesbutthattheauthoritiesdonotwantopentogeneraltraffic.Examplesincludethe
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
173
entire IpswichGuidedbusway,only200meters long,and somesectionsof theSussexFastwaysystem.
Figure 7. Subway in Essen, with dual mode buses and track shared with streetcars
Source:EVAG
Stations and Precision DockingCGBstopsorstationsvaryfromsimplebusstops(usuallywith,atleast,asimplefactory-builtshelter)tostationsequaltosophisticatedlightrailstations,withfullcanopies,real-timepassengerinformation,ticketvendingmachines,andpark-and-ridelots.Onmostsystems,stopsmadeatintermediatestationsareonline;busesdonotleavetheguideway.Allbusesusuallyoperateaslocals,makingallstopsonrequest.However,ononeoftheLeedsbuswaysandontheBradfordroute,there
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
174
areexpressbusroutestothesuburbsthatarenotscheduledtostopatsomebusstops.Iftheyarebehindalocalbusthatmakesastop,theywaitbriefly.
ThetwointermediateAdelaideO-Bahnstationsareuniqueinthatbusescomeoutofguidanceandtheroadwaywidens,allowingexpressbusestopass,althoughfewarescheduled.TheAdelaidestationsarethemostexpansiveCGBstations,withlongplatformsandextensivecanopies.Thelargepark-and-ridelotsareoverflow-ing.Particularlyduringoff-peakperiods, feederroutesterminateattheO-Bahnstations,sharingaplatformwiththroughbusesto/fromdowntown,allowingsameplatformtransfers.
Oneoftheprincipaljustificationsforimplementationofguidedbusoperationisthatitreadilyprovides“precisiondocking”inthesamewayasarailsystem.Withtheadventoflowfloorbuses,fulllevelboardingisprovided.ThisallowsmeetingADAaccessibilityrequirementswithoutdeployingaliftoreven,inmanycases,aramp.EvenpassengersontheolderCGBsystems,withplatformheightsthathadbeensettothe levelof thefirststepofconventionalhighfloorbuses,arenowenjoyingthesebenefits.Whencombinedwithoff-boardfarecollection(typically,employedwithProofofPaymentenforcement),passengerscanboardquickly,atanydoor.
Thehandlingofstopsforguidedbuseswhenoperatingoffguidewayhasvariedgreatly.BecausestopsinAdelaideareoffline,stationsandstreetstopshavelowcurbs.Leedspioneeredtheuseofraisedboardingplatformsatstopsofftheguide-way.Operatorsare instructedtodrivewiththeguidewheelagainstthecurb.Asectionofraisedcurbisprovided,resultinginlevelboarding.Suchstopscanonlybeservedonlybybuseswithguidewheels.
AnewU.S.BRTsystem,theEuclidCorridor inCleveland,willprovideprecisiondockingbyinstallingguidewheelssolelyforthispurposeonthebusesbeingbuiltfortheroute.Coincidentally,thecorridorwillhavesomecentermedianstations,requiringleftsidedoorstobeinstalled.Thus,thesewillbethefirstbusesinNorthAmericawithguidewheelsinstalledonbothsides,althoughnoguidewayopera-tioniscurrentlyplanned.
InLeedstoday,therehasbeenachangeinpractice:alloff-guidewaybusstopsarenowbeingequippedwithapartiallysloped-curb,whichallowsallbuses,withorwithoutguidewheels,tobedrivenclosetothecurbatstopswithoutdamageduetocontactwiththecurbtoeitherthebodyorthetiresidewalls.Thisprovidesanarrowhorizontalgap.Suchcurbs(offaguideway)arenowbeinginstalledata
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
175
lowerheight,180mm(about7inches),sincebuses,whenkneeled,arewithin50mm(2 inches)of theplatform, theallowableverticalgap in theU.K.Thus, thesidewalkdoesnotneedtoberaisedsignificantlytoserveasaplatform.
Inasimilarway,LasVegas isproviding levelboardingon itsMAXsystem,withraised platforms and boarding permitted at all doors, using Proof of Paymentenforcementoftheoff-boardfarecollection.Itwasplannedtoachieveprecisiondockingonthissystemthroughtheuseofanopticalguidancesystem.However,the system was unreliable and has been turned off since shortly after the startofservice.Becausethestationswereequippedwithslopedcurbs,verysimilartothose inLeeds, ithasbeenpossible tocontinue toprovide levelboardingwithsatisfactoryhorizontalgapswithmanualsteering.Thisisfacilitatedbythelackofparkingontheapproachestothestations.
Figure 8. Level boarding, Las Vegas MAX
Source:TranSystems
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
176
Guideway Construction and Maintenance
ThefirstCGBrouteoperatedinrevenueservicewasinEssen(1980).Itusesthetechniqueofprecastsegmentsmountedon“sleepers”(crossbeams),mounted,inturn,onshortdrilledpiles.Today,26yearslater,thislinecontinuestoprovideanextremelysmoothride,andthereisnostructuraldeteriorationoftheconcreterunning surface or discernible wear. Subsequent sections of guideway in Essenwerebuiltusingthistechnique,exceptforramps,sharpcurvesandentries,whichwere poured in place. Since these sections are negotiated at lower speeds theslightly rougher surface is not noticeable. The Adelaide O-Bahn uses the sametypeofpre-castguidewaysegments,builtinAustraliabythesamemanufacturer.However,duetotheextremelysiltysoilalongthealignmentintheTorrensRiverValley,eachsleeperrestsontwo3meter(10feet)deeppiles.Thistechniquehaspreventedanyproblemwithsettlementandprovidesverygoodridequality.
Figure 9. Precast concrete construction
Source:TranSystems
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
177
Allof theU.K. systemsusepoured inplaceconcrete.Theearlyoneswerecon-structed using conventional practice. A major innovation has been the use ofslipformingmachinesforalloftheU.K.CGBprojectssince2001.FortheSussexFastway, the most recent CGB project, construction tolerances for width wereheld to +3mm (0.12 inch) - 0mm, with installation over a base of 300mm (12inches) of recycled concrete. This process has resulted in a smooth ride qual-ityandisexpectedtohavealonglife.ThisprojectwasconstructedwithpavingequipmentmadebyGomaco,amajorAmericansupplier.Rebarbasketsforeachtrackcanbeassembledinamassproductionenvironmentandconnectedinthefield.Typicalroadwayslipformpavingproductionisabout2500lane-feetperday.ItshouldbenotedthatqualitycontrolontheEdinburghFastwaywasinadequate,withtheresultthatridequalitywassubstandarduntilcorrectivegrindingwascar-riedoutbythecontractor.Interestingly,drainageisgreatlysimplifiedcomparedtonormalroadwaysbecauseoftheabilitytoleavethecenterstripunpaved.Over-allconstructioncostshouldbeessentiallythesameasconstructionofanormalroadway.
Figure 10. Slipform construction
Source:British in-situ Paving Association
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
178
Special Considerations in CGB System Design and OperationWhileCGBtechnologyisbasicallysimple,therehavebeensomeadaptationsovertheyearsthatarenotimmediatelyapparent.Allsystemsprovidespecializedtrain-ingandqualificationproceduresforCGBoperators.Onefeaturethatisappliedfairlyuniversallyisthat“run-flat”ringsareinstalledinsidethefronttires,allowingbusestocontinuetothefirstguidewayexitpoint,atreducedspeed,ifairpressureislost.Adelaidetakesspecialprecautionsforitshighspeedoperation.Ithasaddedanemergencybuttonthatoperatorsmustuseiftheirbusisdisabledtopreventrearendcollisions.Whenactivated,rotatingyellowlightsarestarted,andapre-recordedverbal“busstopped”messageisbroadcasttoallbusesoperatingfromthegarageatwhichO-Bahnbusesarebased.Allbusesonthebuswaymuststopuntiltheoriginatingoperatorisabletoidentifytheirlocationanddirection.
Therehavebeentwopiecesofspecializednon-revenuevehiclesconstructedforCGBsystems.Bothhaveguidewheelsoneachend,allowingbi-directionalopera-tion.Adelaidehasarecoveryvehiclematchedtoitshigh-speedoperation,withrelativelylonggapsbetweenbuswayexits.Ithascabsopenbothends,facilitatingrapidmovementagainstthenormalflowoftraffictoreachthedisabledbus.Atowbarandairbrakescanbequicklyconnected.EssenhastheequivalentoftheSwiss Army knife: a multipurpose vehicle equipped with towbar and air brakeconnectionsoneachend,acrane,adumpbody(includingasaltspreaderinsert),andasnowplow.Essenhassignificantsnow/iceconditionsandexperiencedseri-ousproblemsattimesinmaintainingtractionontherampspriortoputtingthisvehicleintoservice.InmostcasesinEssen,disabledbusesaresimplypushedtothenextguidewayexitbythefollowingbus.Thissolutionmaybefacilitatedbythemultipleguidewheelsonitsbuses.
Curb Guided Bus TrendsInstallationofCGBrouteshasbeenslow.TheEssenrouteswereconstructedoveranumberofyearsaspartofademonstrationprogram.Towardtheendofthisperiod,theAdelaidesystemwasconstructed,intwophases.TheonlynewCGBoperationthatopenedbetween1989(thecompletionoftheAdelaideO-Bahn)and1998(openingofScottHallRoadinLeeds)wasthe600footlongKesgrave(U.K.)guideway.However,sincethen,aboutonenewrouteperyearhasopened,andmoreareintheworks.Allofthese,excepttheNagoyasystem,areintheU.K.
Curb Guided Bus Technology and Deployment Trends
179
CGB technology provides a means of providing BRT service with quality morelikeLRT,with fastoperationand levelboarding. Itfits intorights-of-waywhereconventional BRT with dedicated lanes may not fit. It provides one-seat rideswhere LRT may require passengers to transfer to/from feeder buses. It can beimplementedincrementally,startinginpartofacorridor.YetitsinstallationcostisnotsignificantlyhigherthanconventionalBRTandissignificantly lowerthanLRT.Withmoreawarenessofthistechnology,itsrateofgrowth,andgeographicaldispersion,mayincrease.
Figure 11. Essen multipurpose truck
Source:TranSystems
Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition
180
References
Boegner,J.,andMStarck.Undated.Guidedbusessen,informationontheresearchanddevelopmentproject.EssenerVerkehrs-AG,Essen.
Bray,D.J.andD.Scrafton.2000.TheAdelaideO-Bahn:Tenyearson.In8thJointConferenceonLightRailProceedings(CD_ROMPaperK-31.pp1-16),Dallas.
Bray,D.J.2000.ThePerformanceoftheAdelaideO-Bahn.InSmartUrbanTrans-portConferenceProceedings,Brisbane.
Chapman,P.C.1992.TheAdelaideO-Bahn–Howgoodinpractice?SeventeenthAustralasianTransportResearchForumConference,Canberra.
Kim, E.J., G. Darido, and D. Schneck. 2005. Las Vegas MAX BRT DemonstrationProjectEvaluation,FederalTransitAdministration,Washington.
______.1999.Adelaide’sO-BahnBusway–Guidingtransportintothefuture.Pas-sengerTransportBoard,Adelaide.
______.2004.Guided Busway Design Handbook.Britishin-situPavingAssociation,Blackwater,Camberley,Surrey
______.2005.BRTlaneassisttechnologysystems.MetroTransit,Minneapolis.
About the Author
David Phillips([email protected])hasover30yearsofexperienceinallphasesoftransitoperationsplanningprojectsincludingrailandbusoperatingplans,railfeederbusnetworks,coordinationwithdevelopment,vehiclesystems,real-time operational strategies, communications/vehicle location technology,andtransittrafficsignalpriority.After27yearsattheChicagoTransitAuthority(in Operations Planning and project management for technology projects), hemovedtotheprivatesector.AtTranSystems,hehasservedasprojectmanagerforseveralmajorrailandbusinfrastructurestudiesanddesignprojects.