AMANDA KRACZKOWSKY ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO 2012
vivacious 1. full of spirit and animation; lively or vital2. having or displaying tenacity of life
(adj)
In order to engage the senses of the user, architecture must be vivacious. The animated spirit of the form and the composition of the structure must be visually captivating for those who immerse themselves within the space. The transitions throughout a building should be a harmonious marriage of functionality and stimulating spatial progression.
Vivaciousness also refers to the ability of a being to endure and survive within an environment. The greatest architectural works exude an understanding of their surroundings and are adaptive to the changing needs of their users. To ensure future growth and sustainability, we now must address not only the needs of people but also the demands of nature. We must find a way to create an endurable structure within our natural environment while still main-taining a practical application of spatial integrity and program.
In the past few years I have come to understand duality of archi-tecture both in its artistic expression and its functional foundations. A building should not only speak to its users in structure and shape but it should speak of its vernacular. I have come to appreciate the natural environment not only as a source of inspiration for a building but as a driver for the entirety of the design. The vivacity which nature exudes in its rejuvenation, growth and development must be the driving force behind creating lasting, captivating and sustainable architecture.
projectsarchitectural studios & relevant work
studio IV: park. shop. live. create. an artist’s community, parking, retail and residential structure in Austin, Texas
studio III: oasis urbaine (urban oasis) a multi-modal transportation hub in the Rive Gauche district of Paris, France
studio II: bywater community center a community center to fight blight in the Bywater district of New Orleans
studio I: greenovation an improved and futuristic look at student housing in Savannah, Georgia
fundamentals III: residence and spa at 215 w. broughton st. a three-story residential townhouse above a retail space in Savannah, Georgia
fundamentals II: factor’s walk climbing gym a rock climbing center promoting fitness in downtown Savannah, Georgia
fundamentals I: le sommet ski resort an exploration of the structure and tectonics of the built form
construction technology ii. AAA architecture construction documents
additonal paintings and artistic explorations
sta
tem
en
t o
f in
ten
t
co
nte
nts
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
studio iv project location: Austin, Texas program: multipurpose, parking, retail, residential
park. shop. live. create. was inspired by the local culture of the artistic community in Austin, Texas. the vibrant citygoers of live music capitol of the world, home to the austin city limits concert and austin art festival, fueled the playful, colorful design of this multifunctional building. amentities of the structural program include 750 parking spaces, 11 individual street level retail spaces, 35 residential apartments and 22 leasable artist gallery studios.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
park. shop. live. create.creating an artist’s mecca in Austin, TX
Mandy KraczkowskyArchitecture Design Studio IV
Professor Amy WynneFall Quarter 2011
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
the beginning developmental concept by which this studio was orchestrated began with the under-standing of systematic parking decks. through exploration of circulation and by understanding ve-hicular and pedestrian movement, the structures became foundations for explorative interventions.
the importance of parking
parking garage studiessingle-threaded helix circulation model
intervention 1
single-threadedtwo-way traffi c system
original model intervention
parking garage studiesdouble-threaded helix circulation modelintervention 1
double-helixone-way traffi c system
intervention original model
parking garage studiessplit-level circuation model
intervention 1
split-leveltwo-way traffi c system
original model intervention
parking garage studiesmulti-bay circulation modelintervention 1
multi-baymulti-way traffi c system
intervention original model
parking garage studiessingle-threaded helix circulation model
intervention 1
single-threadedtwo-way traffi c system
original model intervention
parking garage studiesmulti-bay circulation modelintervention 1
multi-baymulti-way traffi c system
intervention original model
parking garage studiessplit-level circuation model
intervention 1
split-leveltwo-way traffi c system
original model intervention
parking garage studiesdouble-threaded helix circulation modelintervention 1
double-helixone-way traffi c system
intervention original model
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
the congress street district of austin boasts a variety of locally owned and operated retail and perfor-mance venues. this local atmosphere inspired by the “keep austin weird” movement, an emphatic approach toward showcasing local artisans and musicians within the city and to ensure a flourishing independent business sector. other notable landmarks in this district on the north side of the colo-rado river include new high-rise residential landmarks and a hike & bike trail which utilizes the natural shape of the river to provide an outdoor park within an urban environment.
site analysis
site analysisproject location
site analysisproject location
site analysisaustin city grid
experiential perspectives
view from a distance
approaching car entry
entering garage leaving garage
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
application of programmassing model study 1 &2
application of programmidterm massing model @ 1/128”
application of programmidterm massing model @ 1/128”
experiential perspectives
driving through garage level parking and leaving car
appraching circulation tower circulation tower gallery
experiential perspectives
walking to housing component & south gallery walking to retail component (north side)
entry park for hike & bike trail & circulation paths above returning to circulation tower (northeast corner)
experiential perspectives
walking to housing component & south gallery walking to retail component (north side)
entry park for hike & bike trail & circulation paths above returning to circulation tower (northeast corner)
experiential perspectives
view from a distance
approaching car entry
entering garage leaving garage
experiential perspectives
view from a distance
approaching car entry
entering garage leaving garage
design development
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
fi nal designtypical fl oor plannorth gallery
circulation tower
walkway
south gallery
residences
two-waycirculation ramp
skyways fromgarage togalleries andapartments
pedestrian pathway
solar photovoltaic skin circulation plan
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
24” x 24” square precast concrete columns
16rb32 rectangular concrete columns
8’-0” x 20” double-tee beams
safety guard rails
w 30 x 99 columns anchored to concrete slab (skin frame)
photovoltaic solar panels anchored to w 30 x 99columns with spacing for ventilation
curtain wall panelspolycarbonate plastic sun shadingretail signage
approach arrive connect
enter circulate park
enter explore shop
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
IV: p
ark
. sh
op
. liv
e. c
rea
te.
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
studio iii project location: Rive Gauche, Paris, Franceprogram: multipurpose, tram/bus station & market
oasis urbaine (urban oasis) utilized a prime location at the end of the Avenue du France in Paris’s up-and-coming Rive Gauche district to provide a multi-modal train, tram and bus station for the young neighborhood. inspired by the idea of movement and the post modern green buildings set to be constructed in the area by 2020, oasis urbaine included a naturally growing skin for sustainability as well as an outdoor open-air market for users to openly interact with their community members.
collaborative studio project: architectural studio iii, fundamentals iii, interior design studio iv
studio iii (amanda kraczkowsky): main revit model & structural grid, all photoshop work and board composition, renderings, sections, elevations, skin design
fundamentals iii (matthew spinner): structural detailing, assisting skin composition, process book work
interior design studio iv (michelle kuvinka): kiosk design and functional detailing
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
the Rive Gauche district of Paris, France is located in the southeast corner of the city, balancing the equally modern district of La Defense in the northwest corner. the highly developed and popular sector of La Defense boasts what the Rive Gauche sector currently lacks; a connection to the hu-man scale regardless of the monumentality of the structures. the Rive Gauche is an impressive ex-ample of juxtaposition between the classic historic sector of Paris and a modern atmosphere, yet a connection to the human scale and natural environment would prove crucial in the design.
site analysis
CirculationGreater Paris AnalysisSite Analysis
1.
60
Circulation Rive Gauche AnalysisSite Analysis
1.
1.
1.
1.
60
60
CirculationOn-Site AnalysisSite Analysis
1.
1.
1.
1.
60
greater paris
13th arrondissement (district)
site location, roadways, railways
Natural EnvironmentOn-Site AnalysisSite Analysis
61
vegetation private green space public green space
the rive gauche contains an adequate amount of vegetation, yet does not provide any true in-teractive green space or usable parks for visitors and residents to utilize. the area also lacks a major staple of french life, the outdoor air market or ‘marche.’ in order to maximize the func-tionality of the twin sites, the larger trapezoidal site became home to a multi-modal train de-pot with a connecting bridge to the open air marche and park located on the smaller site.
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
Man-M
ade FeaturesO
-Site FeaturesSite A
nalysis
Prevalent O -Site Features
Train Tracks- Secondary tracks below
site do not interact with
site, will be concealed by the addition of the deck
- Primary Train track and Tram
way run longitudi
nally through site on ground plane, direct impact
Scale- H
eights of surrounding buildings adhere to 37 m
eter rule, may not exceed heigh restrictions
- Four additional superstructures to the northeast of the site exceed heigh restrictions at 180 m
and 120-150 m , respectively
Roof Form
s- Roof form
s are at to adhere to modern buildings
Fenestration Pa erns/O
penings/Sun Penetration- H
eight juxtaposition of buildings allow for
maxim
um sunlight to reach center courts of plots
- Changing of heights results in dicussions am
ong developers of the site
Setbacks- Properties are classi ed as a �“build to�” instead of m
ade to follow m
andated setbacks- Sidew
alks mandated at 15 m
with vegetation of
sorts, overall width m
ay be shorter and resized to 10 m
but without vegetation
Non-intersecting train tracks below
to-be-built deckRespective heights and openings of surround buildings
Pedestrian and bicycle friendly walkw
ay, 15 m w
idth C
hange in building heights/openings for sun penetration
Construction Zone Documentation
Steel reinforcing cables ascending for aid in construction majorconcrete columns below deck
Formwork in place to pour concrete/contain construciton area
Barriers keep from unneccesary falls/intrusion(From top down) Deck, Car parking garage,
Train passageway at lowest level/ground plane
Finished deck surface aboveBeginning completion of surface with asphaltSurface may be bridge of future building plot
Man-Made Features O -Site FeaturesSite Analysis
Deck Construction Over Railway
Section model of proposed Metro shows layers of circulation. Circulation must work successfully below and above site.
Layering/Circulation- Multiple layering of circulation allows for all dif-
ferent types of tra c to ow e ciently.
Column Supports- Large columns, approximately two meters in di-ameter, support the dead and live loads of current
and potential future superstructures.
Metro Rail- The bo om layer consists of railways for the Metro
lines that carry passengers in and out of Paris.
Metro Station- Second layer is the main Metro station were Met-
ro rails can be contained as well.
Existing Railways- Third layer, already present, contains the vast bed
of multi-functional rail lines that support Paris.
Proposed Tram-way/Vehicular/Pedestrian Tra c- The top layer, fully visable is a collage of pedestri-an, vehicular, and the proposed Tram-way that will cirle around the entire perimeter of inner-city Paris.
Roadway below site shows complex layering and structure. Columns support loads from deck and proposed structures.
Man-Made Features O -Site FeaturesSite Analysis
1. 1.
Deck Construction Over Railway
Section model of proposed Metro shows layers of circulation. Circulation must work successfully below and above site.
Layering/Circulation- Multiple layering of circulation allows for all dif-
ferent types of tra c to ow e ciently.
Column Supports- Large columns, approximately two meters in di-ameter, support the dead and live loads of current
and potential future superstructures.
Metro Rail- The bo om layer consists of railways for the Metro
lines that carry passengers in and out of Paris.
Metro Station- Second layer is the main Metro station were Met-
ro rails can be contained as well.
Existing Railways- Third layer, already present, contains the vast bed
of multi-functional rail lines that support Paris.
Proposed Tram-way/Vehicular/Pedestrian Tra c- The top layer, fully visable is a collage of pedestri-an, vehicular, and the proposed Tram-way that will cirle around the entire perimeter of inner-city Paris.
Roadway below site shows complex layering and structure. Columns support loads from deck and proposed structures.
Man-Made Features O -Site FeaturesSite Analysis
1. 1.
deck constructionthe site is located on a manufactured deck above existing rail lines. the deck incorporates new rail lines as well as a road-way system. during the time of site analysis, the upper deck was still under construction, therefore the majority of site anal-ysis information stemmed from urban planning scale models designed by SEMAPA, the leading organization in charge of the massive development.
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
Inspiration Images
Oasis, A pleasant or peaceful area or period in the midst of a di cult, troubled, or hectic place or situation. Creating an Oasis amongst hectic urban life will provide a place people are drawn to.
Tent Structure, Provides shade for people waiting or passing by. The user is a racted to these forms and ones similar due to its safe and homey nature. People will gather in places with this structure because they feel protected.
Marche, Serves as a traditional Market place where a variety of goods can be sold. The trainstation needs this in uence due to the lack of grocery stores in the area. A Farmers Market of fruits, vegetables, and plants will a ract locals and travelers alike.
67
66 68
69 71
70
design development
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
stu
dio
III:
oa
sis u
rba
ine
(u
rba
n o
asis
)
Proposed BuildingStructural Perspective
Structural Skeletal System
Skin Design Skin DetailsDesign Progression
Planter System with Irrigation System.
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
studio ii project location: Bywater, New Orleans, Louisiana program: community center
the bywater community center was heavily influenced by the surrounding geographic context of new orleans, the vibrant music and festival culture and the tumultuous conditions still impacting the community from Hurricane Katrina. music and the flow of the Mississippi River, the backbone upon which New Orleans was established, became the main driving force for creating a fluent circulation path throughout the building. the community center utilized an existing horse stable structure and included a program with a cafe, day care center, meeting hall and outdoor amphitheater.
collaborative studio project: architectural studio ii, graduate interior design studio ii
studio ii (amanda kraczkowsky): revit model, final board, final model, process book, design develop-ment and changes, hand rendering perspectives and sections
grad interior design studio ii (rand gharaibeh): revit model, process book & graphics, design devel-opment and changes, 3dmax renderings, interior rcp’s & furniture layouts
Bywater Community Center Promoting Community Spirit in New Orleans, Louisiana
The ClientThe Bywater Neighborhood Association is in need of a place to hold community activities and local events.
Design TheoryThe design is based on the Japanese principle ‘shakkei’, defined as borrowed scenery or landscape. The original agricultural land division of New Orleans plantations is known as the Arpent System.
Design ConceptThe musical keywords used to influence the design are octave, rhythm, and dynamic. Their relationship to water and its fluid qualities are the basis for the overall design.
Design IntentThe intention is to create a highly dynamic, functional program. A modern building intervention, representative of the fluidity of water and the sound of music, will provide a connection within the two separate halves of the Bywater community.
C o n c e p t
S i t e A n a l y s i s
O c t a v e R h y t h m D y n a m i c I n t e g r a t i o n G r o w t h F l o w C o n s t a n t Va r i a b l e s I n t e r a c t i n g F l u c t u a t i o n
D e s i g n
Mandy Kraczkowsky & Rand GharaibehARCH 302 & INDS 714 Winter 2011
Professors Montgomery & Whitney
G. Intersection of North Rampart St & Poland Avenue
H. Community Room
I. Day care CenterC. North Cafe Entrance from Poland Avenue, Accessible Parking, Outdoor Amphitheater
New Orleans, LouisianaLocated at the mouth of the Mississippi River and on the Gulf of Mexico, New Orleans, Louisiana has a rich history of trade, shipping, music and culture. Sedimentary silt shapes the landscape of the city and creates differences in topography of 40 feet above and 15 feet below sea level.
BywaterBywater is located in the Upper Ninth ward of the city grid. Bywater sits three feet above sea level and is bordered by the Industrial Canal to the East and the Mississippi River to the South.
Site1000 Poland Avenue consists of a narrow stable building and an adjacent green space. The location is on the corner of Poland Avenue and North Rampart Street.
Scope of ProjectThe design will include the renovation of the existing stables building and adding new space through a secondary structure and a redesign of the outdoor area.
Mississippi RiverArpent System
Land Division Purity, Harmony, Reflectivity
DynamicGrowth
Interacting
Fluctuation Rhythm
Interacting FlowConstant
Fluctuation
Live Jazz Night Clubs The Mississippi River Mirliton Festival Southside Bywater Jazz Musicians Mardi Gras
Street Section: North to South
0 Elevation Line
1.5’
3’
4.5’
6’
A. West Facade from North Rampart St. and Rear Entry
B. Poland Avenue, Accessible Parking and Entryway
C. Lobby & Existing Building Renovation
D. Main Entry and Lobby
E. Cafe and Secondary Entry
F. Main Entrance: Poland Avenue
A l t e r n a t i v e Fu r n i t u r e P l a n s B a s e d o n S p a t i a l U s a g e
Cafe
Women’s Rest room
Men’s Rest room
Janitor ClosetShower
Rentable OfficeMeeting Office
Liaison OfficeMain Lobby
Coat Closet Rest room
Classroom
Nap Room
Mechanical Room
Storage
Library
Community Room
Day Care & Play Space
Interior Courtyard
Cafe Counter
E a s t E l e v a t i o n S o u t h E l e v a t i o n We s t E l e v a t i o n N o r t h E l e v a t i o n
A
S i t e P l a n : 1 0 0 0 Po l a n d A v e n u e
Accessible Parking
Cafe Entry
Main Entry
Rear Entry
Outdoor Amphitheater
Pola
nd A
venu
e
North Rampart Street
Water Collection Cisterns
Readapted Use ofExisting StructureNew Building Addition
Outdoor Urban Garden
Interior Courtyard
Fire Station
Neighborhood Residences
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n
SITE ORGANIZATION
Existing East Elevation; Facing Poland Avenue
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
the bywater community, located south of the infamously flooded lower 9th ward, received moder-ate damage from recent Hurricane Katrina. its proximity to the Mississippi River and its placement on slightly higher ground saved the area from receiving the same catastrophic damage as its neighbor-ing districts. however, due to blight caused by the displacement of new orleans citizens, the area’s community spirit has not be revived back to its original status. through the construction of a com-munity center at bywater, it was the hope of our studio to reestablish this ward’s vivaciousness.
site analysis
SITE ORGANIZATION
Existing South Elevation; Facing North Rampart Street
new orleans parish
bywater district & industrial canal
new orleans
bywater
mississippi river
existing historical horse stable (on site)
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
the design theory of ‘shakkei’, meaning ‘borrowed landscape’ in Japanese became a primary driv-er for utilizing the new orleans landscape within the design. drawing also from the city’s rich musi-cal history, the three key musical terms octave, rhythm and dynamic were used as concept drivers. based on the landmasses formed by the mississippi river’s water flow and this musical terminology, the goal became to create a modern intervention on an existing historic structure by linking the cul-tural history of the bywater neighborhood with its promising future.
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
CONCEPTUAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
C o n c e p t u a l A p p r o a c h
Wrapping
Octave
Fluctuating
Depth
Dynamic
Integration
Rhythm
Growth
Flowing
Layering
Concept models re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.
Integration
Rhythm
Growth
Flowing
Layering
Concept models re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
CONCEPTUAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
C o n c e p t u a l A p p r o a c h
Wrapping
Octave
Fluctuating
Depth
Dynamic
Integration
Rhythm
Growth
Flowing
Layering
Concept models re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.
Figure-Ground Rhythm Flow Integration
Variables Interacting Dynamic Wavy
Concept diagrams re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.
Figure-Ground Rhythm Flow Integration
Variables Interacting Dynamic Wavy
Concept diagrams re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.
Figure-Ground Rhythm Flow Integration
Variables Interacting Dynamic Wavy
Concept diagrams re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
Original Conceptual Schematic Plans
SCHEMATIC ORIGINS
The original concept sketches include a sweeping curve which intersects the existing building and expands into thegreen space.
The schematic connection between the old and new was intended to reach out into the neighbhorhood as an invitation to all community members to utilize the building.
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n
CONCEPTUAL & SCHEMATIC SYNTHESIS
Amphitheater shapeResponding to Mississippi River
Stepping design for clerestoryResponding to Mississippi River
Amphitheater responding to building elevation Curvature mimicing Mississippi River& Shakkai System
Original Conceptual Schematic Plans
SCHEMATIC ORIGINS
The original concept sketches include a sweeping curve which intersects the existing building and expands into thegreen space.
The schematic connection between the old and new was intended to reach out into the neighbhorhood as an invitation to all community members to utilize the building.
ORIGINAL CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n
SECOND SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n
THIRD SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN
schematic design development
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
mechanical room
storage
library
interiorcourtyard
communityroom
cafe
women’srestroomshowe r
janitor closetmen’s
restroom
rentable officemeeting office
liaison office
main lobby
coat closet
restroom (for classroom)
classroom (flex space)
nap room & childcare area
daycare
outdoor amphitheater
water collection cisterns
new building addition
rear entry &outdoor urban garden
accessibleparking
cafe entry
readapted use of historic
structure
main entrance
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
E a s t E l e v a t i o n
We s t E l e v a t i o n
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
E a s t E l e v a t i o n
We s t E l e v a t i o n
We s t t o E a s t S e c t i o n N e w B u i l d i n g
E a s t t o We s t S e c t i o n N e w B u i l d i n g
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
We s t t o E a s t S e c t i o n E x i s t i n g B u i l d i n g
E a s t t o We s t S e c t i o n E x i s t i n g B u i l d i n g
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
Po l a n d A v e n u e a n d E n t r y w a y I n t e r s e c t i o n o f N o r t h R a m p a r t S t . & Po l a n d A v e n u e
We s t Fa c a d e a n d R e a r E n t r y
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
Po l a n d A v e n u e a n d E n t r y w a y I n t e r s e c t i o n o f N o r t h R a m p a r t S t . & Po l a n d A v e n u e
We s t Fa c a d e a n d R e a r E n t r y
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
Po l a n d A v e n u e a n d E n t r y w a y I n t e r s e c t i o n o f N o r t h R a m p a r t S t . & Po l a n d A v e n u e
We s t Fa c a d e a n d R e a r E n t r y N o r t h C a f e E n t r a n c e f r o m Po l a n d A v e n u e , A c c e s s i b l e Pa r k i n g , O u t d o o r A m p h i t h e a t e r
M a i n E n t r a n c e : Po l a n d A v e n u e
N o r t h C a f e E n t r a n c e f r o m Po l a n d A v e n u e , A c c e s s i b l e Pa r k i n g , O u t d o o r A m p h i t h e a t e r
M a i n E n t r a n c e : Po l a n d A v e n u e
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
M a i n E n t r y a n d L o b b y C o m m u n i t y R o o m
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
FINAL DESIGN
C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
r
stu
dio
II: b
ywa
ter c
om
mu
nity
ce
nte
rst
ud
io II
: byw
ate
r co
mm
un
ity c
en
ter
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
studio i project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: student housing renovation
following the concept of human proportioning and accessibility, the renovation of SCAD’s Ogletho-rpe House dormitory became a relavent concept to explore when designing student housing in rela-tion to comfort and needs of the student population. the existing structure, a 1960’s motel adorned with wrought iron and art deco detailing, provided the bones beneath a total exterior transforma-tion and built addition. the new design included flexible suite-style student rooms as well as more traditional double rooms, a new lobby and adjacent green space and a green skin composed of ventilated louver systems for natural ventilation.
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
beginning the first official studio course with a site located in our school’s city provided a well-grounded knowledge of the existing cultural context of Savannah. the analysis of the site included the student’s perspective on housing, which became crucial consideration in a practical design. the input of student clients in conjunction with our own knowledge of existing dormitory conditions in savannah became the driving force in addressing the necessary programmatic components for a dormitory renovation.
site analysis
!"#$%&!'($)&!*+$)
+,-,..,&)/!##$"$)!0),'%)1)2$+3".)
456)7)!"#$%&!'($),-$)
+,-,..,&)",)86956)
)
+3%$)($'3:$%$';)
!"#$%&!'($),-$<)=)85>?)
@,'.,'2)+%<)=)464<A?))
oglethorpe house
J.O.’s cafe
club SCAD
parking
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
) ) ) )
)
)
!"#$%&!'($)&!*+$) ) )
B!?C)/,0$%$'3,)
/#*@)+/,2)
(,'D3.")
+3%$)"$!:$%'E)
&3$','/&E)
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
transition from urban bustle to private green spaceskin louvers allows natural ventilation and reflect sunlight
transition from urban to natural environment within structure
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
stu
dio
I: g
ree
no
vatio
n
fun
da
me
nta
ls III
: 215
w b
rou
gh
ton
st
fund. iii project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: residence & 1st floor retail
utilizing the existing historical context of Savannah’s downtown commercial center, the residence at 215 w. broughton with leasable retail space introduced specific interaction with a client and explored problem solving in order to meet their specific needs. spatial configuration of rooms and openings was based on the desires of the client and overall exterior design remained dependent on matching the surrounding downtown facade syles and materiality. proposed structure
215 w. broughton st
215 w. broughton st
fun
da
me
nta
ls III
: 215
w b
rou
gh
ton
st
fun
da
me
nta
ls III
: 215
w b
rou
gh
ton
st
load bearing masonry wall
structural floor plan
fun
da
me
nta
ls III
: 215
w b
rou
gh
ton
st
fun
da
me
nta
ls II:
fac
tor’
s w
alk
gym
fund. ii project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: rock climbing gym
the climbing gym on factor’s walk and its accompanying programmatic requirements became the first exploration into the systematic skill of managing spaces and their adjacent connections. func-tional square footages and the first inclusion of a real-life site made this the first practically applied project I had explored. programmatic elements included a three-story rock climbing wall, party and meeting rooms, locker and restroom areas and specific mechanical/storage needs.
fun
da
me
nta
ls II:
fac
tor’
s w
alk
gym
fun
da
me
nta
ls II:
fac
tor’
s w
alk
gym
fun
da
me
nta
ls II:
fac
tor’
s w
alk
gym
fun
da
me
nta
ls I:
le s
om
me
t sk
i re
sort
fund. i project location and program theoretical
this course introduced the first practical application of tectonics and structural integrity within the field of architecture. through the exploration of various spatial configurations, solid and voided el-ements and a concrete repeatable floor plan, an overall structure and conceivable building was formed. steps to complete this project included the study of primary, secondary and tertiary spaces, application of entryways and circulation, application of a tower to achieve monumentality and the construction of a base to ensure a secure connection within a theoretical site.
fun
da
me
nta
ls I:
le s
om
me
t sk
i re
sort
studies of primary, secondary and tertiarty spatial conditions led to structural grid development and entryway studies
fun
da
me
nta
ls I:
le s
om
me
t sk
i re
sort
fun
da
me
nta
ls I:
le s
om
me
t sk
i re
sortfinal model
co
nst
ruc
tion
te
ch
no
log
y II:
AA
A A
rch
itec
ture
c.t. ii project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: 1st floor retail, 2nd & 3rd floor office space
in order to fully understand the concept of structural assembly and the stringency of building codes, in groups of three we planned for a commercial building on broughton street. design developments included site location and accompanying elevations, universal accessibility requirements for spac-ing, structural sections and layout and subsequent structural detailing.
collaborative project: three students all enrolled in architectural studio ii & construction technology ii
amanda kraczkowsky: primary coding and zoning, elevation design, main steel structural system design, accompanying door jamb detailing
anna gosselin: coding and zoning, elevations, main universal accessibility design, site cast concrete system, accompanying mullion connection detail
arielle villardo: coding and zoning, elevation design, main site location analysis, precast concrete system, accompanying door head connection detail
co
nst
ruc
tion
te
ch
no
log
y II:
AA
A A
rch
itec
ture
SHEET INDEXA- 101 COVER SHEETA- 102 FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONSA- 103 EGRESS AND ACCESSIBILITY DETAILSA- 104 WALL SECTIONSA- 105 WALL DETAILSS- 101 SITECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURAL DETAILSS- 102 STEEL ASSEMBLY STRUCTURAL DETAILSS- 103 PRECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURAL DETAILS
Build
ing
De
sign
230
We
st B
rou
gh
ton
Str
ee
tSa
van
na
h, G
A 3
1401
Project Partners:
Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky
Arielle Vilardo
ARCHITECTURE
SCADConstruction
Tech II
Site, Roof Plan, andDrawing Index
A-101
Re
visio
ns
01. 1
3.11
Des ig
nSu
bmiss
ion
02. 0
2.11
Init ia
lRev
ision
AG02
. 26.
11Co
n tex
tIn p
utAV
co
nst
ruc
tion
te
ch
no
log
y II:
AA
A A
rch
itec
ture
UP
UP
UP
UP UP
UPELEV.
6' - 0" 3' - 0"
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
RESTROOM
MERCANTILEOPEN FLOOR PLAN
90' -
0"
6' -
10"
7' -
7"4'
- 4"
6' -
0"
3' -
0"3'
- 0"
9' -
4"
3' - 8" 3' - 0" 5' - 9" 3' - 4" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 5" 3' - 0" 4' - 1"
60' - 0"
23' - 0"
8' - 9"
18' - 8 3/4" 16' - 3 1/4" 6' - 0" 17' - 1 1/2"
----A 104-1
----A 104-2
----A 104-3
A 105-3
A 105-1
A 105-2
ELEVATOR
STAIR # 2
STAIR #1
RESTROOM
OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
UP
90' -
0"
19' -
9"
7' -
7"8'
- 4"
4' -
4"6'
- 8"
3' -
0"
70' -
0"
9' -
4"
3' -
0"
23' - 0"
12' - 4 1/2"
3' - 0" 5' - 1" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 13' - 0" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 1"
60' - 0"
4' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 0 3/4" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 5' - 11 1/4" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 2"
3' -
0"
ELEVATOR
OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN
STAIR # 1
RESTROOM
STAIR # 2
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
8' -
4"4'
- 4"
6' -
8"
3' - 0" 5' - 1" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 13' - 3" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 10"
9' -
4"
3' -
0"
23' - 0"
8' - 9"
3' -
0"
3' -
0"
3' - 0" 5' - 0 3/4" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 6' - 3 1/4" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 10"
FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR13' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR24' - 0"
ROOF35' - 0"Brick Facing
Terra Cotta Tiles
Double Pane Glass
FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR13' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR24' - 0"
ROOF35' - 0"
CommercialStorefront Glass
Steel Framming
Low E Glass
Terra Cotta Tile
Build
ing
De
sign
230
We
st B
rou
gh
ton
Str
ee
tSa
van
na
h, G
A 3
1401
SCADConstruction
Tech II
Project Partners:
Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky
Arielle Villardo
ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory
ARCHITECTURE
Re
vis io
ns
1/8" = 1'-0"A104-1FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A102-2SECOND FLOOR PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"A102-3THIRD FLOOR PLAN
NORTH NORTH
NORTH
Floor Plans andElevations
A-102
01.1
3.11
De
sign
Su
bm
issio
n02
.26.
11La
you
t R
evi
sion
- A
V03
.09.
11R
evi
sion
- A
V
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION
co
nst
ruc
tion
te
ch
no
log
y II:
AA
A A
rch
itec
ture
UP
UP
UP
UP UP
UPELEV.
A-102E101-4
A-102E101-5
62' - 8 1/2"
Maxim
um Travel Distance
6' - 0" 3' - 0"
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
STAIR
STAIR
RESTROOM
MERCANTILEOPEN FLOOR PLAN
A-102E101-6
2' - 6"
4' -
0"
16' - 9"
20' -
2 1
/4"
0' -
2 1/
2"
ELEVATOR
55' -
2 1/4"
Maxim
umTra
vel D
istanc
e
STAIR
STAIR
RESTROOM
OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
ELEVATOR
54' -
111/4
"
Maxim
umTra
vel D
istanc
e
OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN
STAIR
RESTROOM
STAIR
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
0' -
6"
RESTROOM
2' - 4"TOILET IS 2'-4" oc FOR CLEAR SPACING
3' - 11"
INDICATES 5' TURNING RADIUS
3' -
0"
3' CLEARANCE IN DOOR SPACING
6' -
9"
10' - 4"
3' -
6"
3' - 0"36" OF WHEEL CHAIR RAIL BEHIND TOILET
7' - 0"
7' -
5"
MORE THAN 42" OF CLEARANCE
0' -
5"
4" OF WALL BEYOND DOOR SWING
42" OF WHEEL CHIAR RAIL
4' -
6"
8' -
8"
4' -
3 3/
4"4'
- 4
1/4"
3' - 0"
3' -
0"
2' - 6"
4' -
0" UP
AREA OF REFUGE: MIN. OF 30" X 40" SPACE OUTSIDE OF THE 48" OF LANDING SPACE
5' - 2 1/2"
3' - 10 1/4"
0' - 11"
STAIR TREAD IS 11"
1' - 0"
HANDRAILS EXTEND 12INCHES BEYOND STAIR
STAIR IS GREATER THAN 44" WIDE
5' - 1 1/4"
0' - 6"CLEARANCE OFGREATER THAN 60 "
R 3' - 8 15/32"
STAIR
ELEVATOR
6' -
0"
UP
1' -
0"
HANDRAIL MUST EXTEND12" BEYOND END OF STAIR
STAIR IS GREATER THAN 44" WIDE
4' - 0"2' -
6"
AREA OF REFUGE: MIN OF 30" X 48"
3' - 0"
EXIT DOOR IS 6' WIDTH ANDOPENS TO A 16' X 19' SPACE
INDICATES 5' TURNING RADIUS
5' -
0"
R 4' - 7 7/8"
3' - 10 1/2"
HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AMINIMUM RADIUS OF 1 1/4" TO A DIAMETER OF 2"
Build
ing
De
sign
230
We
st B
rou
gh
ton
Str
ee
tSa
van
na
h, G
A 3
1401
SCADConstruction
Tech II
Project Partners:
Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky
Arielle Villardo
ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory
ARCHITECTURE
Re
vis io
ns
1/8" = 1'-0"E101-1FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"E101-2SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"E101-3THIRD FLOOR PLAN
NORTH
NORTHNORTH
EgressFloor Plans
A-103 1/4" = 1'-0"E101-4TYPICAL RESTROOM ENLARGED PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"E101-5TYPICAL STAIR #2 ENLARGEDFLOORPLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"E101-6TYPICAL STAIR #1 ENLARGEDFLOORPLAN
02.2
7.11
2nd
Eg
ress
Su
bm
issio
n -
AG
01.2
7.11
Egre
ss S
ub
miss
ion
03.0
9.11
3rd
Eg
ress
Su
bm
issio
n A
G
co
nst
ruc
tion
te
ch
no
log
y II:
AA
A A
rch
itec
ture
co
nst
ruc
tion
te
ch
no
log
y II:
AA
A A
rch
itec
ture
4’ x 4’ x 24" CONCRETECOLUMN FOOTING
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.
12" x 18" CONCRETEFOUNDATION FOOTING
12" x 18" CONCRETEFOUNDATION FOOTING
1.5 " DEEP CONTROL JOINTSSPACED 10’ ON SLAB
EXI
STI
NG
BU
ILD
ING
EXI
STI
NG
BU
ILD
INGS 102-4
S-102
6" CONCRETE SLAB CONTAININGWELDED WIRE FABRIC OVERVAPOR RETARDANT BARRIER ONGRAVEL DRAINAGE
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.
4’ x 4’ x 24" CONCRETECOLUMN FOOTING
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.
12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.
12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.
10K1 STEEL JOISTS AT 2’ O.C. IN STAIRWAY
10K1 STEEL JOISTS AT 2’O.C. IN STAIRWAY
12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.
EXI
STI
NG
BU
ILD
ING
EXI
STI
NG
BU
ILD
ING
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.2
4K4
OP
EN
WE
B S
TEE
L J
OIS
T
EXI
STI
NG
BU
ILD
ING
EXI
STI
NG
BU
ILD
ING
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.
12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.
12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.
10K1 STEEL JOISTSAT 2’ O.C. IN STAIRWAY
12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.
10K1 STEEL JOISTS AT 2’ O.C. IN STAIRWAY
24
K4 O
PE
N W
EB
STE
EL
JO
IST
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR13' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR24' - 0"
ROOF35' - 0"
STAIRWELL TO ROOF
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.
W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C..
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
6" CONCRETE SLAB W/ WELDED WIREFABRIC OVER MOISTURE BARRIER ONCRUSHED GRAVEL DRAINAGE
8" REINFORCED CMU MASONRY WALL
12" X 18" CONCRETEFOOTING
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
4’ x 4’ x 24" COLUMN FOOTINGWITH STEEL CABLEREINFORCING
W8 8"X8" COLUMN PLACED 30’ X30’ O.C.
ANCHOR BOLT
LEVELING GROUT
4’ x 4’ x 24" COLUMN FOOTINGWITH STEEL CABLE EINFORCING
6" CONCRETE SLABCONTAINING WELDED WIRE FABRIC
VAPOR RETARDANT BARRIERGRAVEL DRAINAGE
W8 8"X8"COLUMN PLACED30’ X 30’ O.C.
W16X36 STEEL BEAM
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
WELDED STEELANGLE CONNECTION
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING
ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
Build
ing
De
sign
230
We
st B
rou
gh
ton
Str
ee
tSa
van
na
h, G
A 3
1401
SCADConstruction
Tech II
Project Partners:
Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky
Arielle Villardo
ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory
ARCHITECTURE
Re
visio
ns
Ori g
ina
lSu
bm
is sio
n:2
/24/
2011
Re
v isio
n1 :
2/29
/201
1R
ev i
sion
2 :3/
9/20
11Fi
na
lRe
visio
n:3
/10/
2011
1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-1FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-2SECOND FLOOR PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-3THIRD FLOOR PLANNORTH
NORTH NORTH
SteelAssembly
S-102 1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-4EAST/WEST SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0"S 102-5COLUMN TO FOOTING DETAIL 3/4" = 1'-0"S 102-6COLUMN TO FLOOR DETAIL
SCALE SCALE SCALE
SCALESCALE SCALE SCALE
S 102−7
S 102−6
S 102−5
3/4" = 1'-0"S 102-7WALL TO FLOOR CONNECTION
METAL COPING
ANCHOR PLATE WITHCOMPRESSION BARS
CONTINUOUS CLEAT
FORMED METAL COPING
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
GROUT
STEEL BEARING PLATE
ANCHOR BOLT
MORTAR JOINT
STEEL REINFORCING
CANT STRIP
ROOF MEMBRANE
MOISTURE BARRIER
INSULATION
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
OPEN WEB 24K4 STEEL JOISTS
ROOF CONNECTION
FOUNDATION FOOTING
DRAINAGE MAT
EARTH
PROTECTION BOARD
CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB WITH STEELWELDED WIRE REINFORCING
EXPANSION JOINT
MEMBRANE
PROTECTION BOARD
CRUSHED STONE DRAINAGE
MEMBRANE
STEEL REINFORCING CABLES
FIRST FLOOR 0’−0"
THIRD FLOOR 24’ − 0"
ROOF 35’ − 0"
SECOND FLOOR 13− 0"
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING
ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING
ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
RIGID INSULATION
RIGID INSULATION
RIGID INSULATION
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
WEATHERSTRIPPING
HEAD JAMB
GLASS AND ALUMINUM FRAMED DOOR
VAPOR RETARDER
THRESHOLD
THRESHOLD SEALANT
WEATHERSTRIPPING
VAPOR RETARDER
BACKER RODS AND SEALANT
FLASHINGWOOD FRAMED WINDOW
ADDITIONAL SILL OR SUBSILLFOR EXTERIOR DRIP
FLASHING
STOOL
FLASHINGWOOD FRAMED WINDOW
ADDITIONAL SILL OR SUBSILLFOR EXTERIOR DRIP
FLASHING
STOOL
METAL COPING
ANCHOR PLATE WITHCOMPRESSION BARS
CONTINUOUS CLEAT
FORMED METAL COPING
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
GROUT
STEEL BEARING PLATE
ANCHOR BOLT
MORTAR JOINT
STEEL REINFORCING
CANT STRIP
ROOF MEMBRANE
MOISTURE BARRIER
INSULATION
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
OPEN WEB 24K4 STEEL JOISTS
ROOF CONNECTION
FOUNDATION FOOTING
DRAINAGE MAT
EARTH
PROTECTION BOARD
CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB WITH STEELWELDED WIRE REINFORCING
EXPANSION JOINT
MEMBRANEPROTECTION BOARD
CRUSHED STONE DRAINAGEMEMBRANE
STEEL REINFORCING CABLES
FIRST FLOOR 0’−0"
THIRD FLOOR 24’ − 0"
ROOF 35’ − 0"
SECOND FLOOR 13− 0"
SEE DOOR JAMB PLAN DETAIL
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING
ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING
ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE
24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
RIGID INSULATION
RIGID INSULATION
RIGID INSULATION
RIGID INSULATION
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
METAL COPING
ANCHOR PLATE WITHCOMPRESSION BARS
CONTINUOUS CLEAT
FORMED METAL COPING
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
GROUT
SHELF ANGLE
MORTAR JOINT
STEEL REINFORCING
CANT STRIP
ROOF MEMBRANE
MOISTURE BARRIER
INSULATION
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
ROOF CONNECTION
FOUNDATION FOOTING
DRAINAGE MAT
EARTH
PROTECTION BOARD
CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB WITH STEELWELDED WIRE REINFORCING
EXPANSION JOINT
MEMBRANEPROTECTION BOARD
CRUSHED STONE DRAINAGEMEMBRANE
STEEL REINFORCING CABLES
FIRST FLOOR 0’−0"
THIRD FLOOR 24’ − 0"
ROOF 35’ − 0"
SECOND FLOOR 13− 0"
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
RIGID INSULATION
RIGID INSULATION
RIGID INSULATION
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL
1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING
CONCRETE FILL
RIGID INSULATION
GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL
STEEL 12K1 JOIST
SHELF ANGLE
STEEL 12K1 JOIST
SHELF ANGLE
STEEL 12K1 JOIST
Build
ing
De
sign
230
We
st B
rou
gh
ton
Str
ee
tSa
van
na
h, G
A 3
1401
SCADConstruction
Tech II
Project Partners:
Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky
Arielle Villardo
ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory
ARCHITECTURE
Re
visio
ns
Ori g
ina
lSu
bm
is sio
n:2
/24/
2011
Re
v isio
n1 :
2/29
/201
1R
ev i
sion
2 :3/
9/20
11
Fin
alR
evi
sion
:3/1
0/20
11
Wall Sections
A 104
A 104-1
A 104-2
A 104-3REAR WALL SECTION
FRONT WALL SECTION
SIDE WALL SECTION3/4" = 1'-0" SCALE
3/4" = 1'-0" SCALE
3/4" = 1'-0" SCALE
ad
diti
on
al p
ain
ting
s &
art
istic
exp
lora
tion
s
additional paintings & artistic explorations
recreation of claude daubigny’s “the barges”18” x 24” acrylic on canvas final project, art history II (ARTH 110) spring 2009
ad
diti
on
al p
ain
ting
s &
art
istic
exp
lora
tion
s
en
viro
nm
en
tal c
on
tro
l 1: m
iam
i re
side
nc
e
ad
diti
on
al p
ain
ting
s &
art
istic
exp
lora
tion
s
ad
diti
on
al p
ain
ting
s &
art
istic
exp
lora
tion
s
“a walk in the garden”16” x 20” acrylic on canvas (commissioned work) summer 2011
reinterpretation of claude monet’s “water lillies”24” x 36” oil on canvas (commissioned work) summer 2011
en
viro
nm
en
tal c
on
tro
l 1: l
igh
ting
stu
die
s
AR
CH
ITEC
TUR
E PO
RTF
OLI
O 2
012
AMANDA KRACZKOWSKY49 OLD MUSKET DRIVE
NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06111(860) 202 - 8388 [email protected]