Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report
Curtiss-Wright Hangar
Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
Columbia, South Carolina
June 30, 2011
Terracon Project No. 73117715
Prepared for:
Congaree Coalition and
Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
Columbia, South Carolina
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Columbia, South Carolina
Terracon Consul tants, Inc. 521 Clemson Road Columbia, South Carolina 29229
P [803] 741 9000 F [803] 741 9900 terracon.com
June 30, 2011
Congaree Coalition
PO Box 734
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Attn: Mr. Fred Delk
Executive Director
Re: Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report
Curtiss-Wright Hangar
Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
Columbia, SC
Terracon Project No. 73117715
Dear Mr. Delk:
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to present the results of the asbestos and
lead paint survey performed on June 23, 2011, at the Curtiss-Wright Hangar located at the
intersection of Airport Boulevard and Jim Hamilton Boulevard in Columbia, South Carolina.
We understand that this survey was requested due to the potential renovation of the structure.
Asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were detected in the samples collected from the
building. Additionally, lead was identified in painted components and substrates. Please refer
to the report for details.
Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services for the
Congaree Coalition and Richland County. If you should have any questions regarding this
report, or if you need assistance with bid documents or project oversight during the building
renovation, please contact the undersigned at (803) 741-9000.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
William Walker Norman E. Partin, Jr, CHMM Environmental Scientist Manager, ESA Services Department
Cc: Brian Kvam, PG – CTC-PBC
Chris Eversmann, PE – Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER LETTER
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Project Objective ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 2 3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY ............................................................................................... 2
3.1 Regulatory Overview ..................................................................................... 2 3.2 Visual Assessment ........................................................................................ 3 3.3 Physical Assessment .................................................................................... 3 3.4 Sample Collection ......................................................................................... 3 3.5 Sample Analysis............................................................................................ 4 3.6 Finding and Recommendations ..................................................................... 4
4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY ................................................................................ 5
4.1 Regulatory Overview ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Sampling and Analytical Protocol .................................................................. 6 4.3 Sample Collection ......................................................................................... 6 4.4 Findings and Recommendations ................................................................... 6
5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS ........................................................................................... 6
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - TABLES Table 1 - Asbestos Survey Sample Summary Table 2 - Lead Based Paint Sample Summary
APPENDIX B – LABORATORY REPORTS
Asbestos Analytical Laboratory Data Lead Paint Analytical Laboratory Data
APPENDIX C – INSPECTOR’S CREDENTIALS
APPENDIX D – PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
Reliable ■ Responsive ■ Convenient ■ Innovative 1
ASBESTOS & LEAD PAINT SURVEY REPORT
CURTISS-WRIGHT HANGAR
JIM HAMILTON LB OWENS AIRPORT
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA
Project No. 73117715
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos and lead paint survey of building
materials at the Curtiss-Wright Hangar located at the intersection of Airport Boulevard and Jim
Hamilton Boulevard in Columbia, South Carolina. The asbestos and lead paint survey was
conducted on June 23, 2011, by a South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental
Control (SCDHEC) licensed building inspector in general accordance with our Proposal No
P73110128 dated May 19, 2011. Interior and exterior building components were surveyed and
homogeneous areas of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were visually identified and
documented. Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials,
additional suspect but un-sampled materials could be located in walls, in voids or in other
concealed areas. Suspect ACM was sampled in general accordance with the sampling protocols
outlined in EPA Regulation 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, AHERA).
Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy
(PLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), as required.
Paint samples were collected from all visible and accessible building components and paint
systems and submitted to an Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP)
approved laboratory for analysis of lead by NIOSH Method 7082M (Atomic Absorption).
1.1. Project Objective
We understand the asbestos and lead paint survey was requested due to the potential interior
renovation of the building. EPA regulation 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the
atmosphere during renovation/demolition activities. NESHAP requires that potentially regulated
asbestos-containing building materials be identified, classified and quantified prior to planned
disturbances or demolition activities.
The objective of the lead paint evaluation was to identify lead based paint systems on building
components that may require special handling and disposal considerations upon renovation of the
structure.
Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report Curtiss-Wright Hangar ■ Columbia, SC June 30, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. 73117715
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2
2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
The site contains a one-story, approximately 13,000 square-foot airport hangar reportedly
constructed in 1929. The building is a brick and steel framed structure with an arched metal
roof. The hangar has two side wings also constructed of brick. The east wing is divided into
three rooms including a bathroom. One partition wall is plywood, the other concrete block. An
exterior concrete stairway rises up to the top of the east wing which has a concrete floor. The
west wing is open with no partition walls. The west wing roof is covered with tar and gravel.
The hangar floors are concrete. Interior finishes consist of deteriorating plaster walls or exposed
brick. The middle room of the east wing has terra cotta tile and 9” vinyl tile over concrete. The
hangar contains a basement boiler room and coal room with chute. Windows in the hangar are
large metal framed window and make up a large portion of the perimeter walls. Large metal
sliding doors are located on the north and south ends of the building. No HVAC system was
observed.
3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY
The asbestos survey was conducted by Mr. Gene Partin; SCDHEC licensed Asbestos Building
Inspector (License No. BI-00473, exp. 9/30/11). The survey was conducted on June 23, 2011, in
general accordance with the sampling protocols established by EPA Regulation 40 CFR 763,
AHERA. A summary of survey activities is provided below.
3.1 Regulatory Overview
The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and
asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of existing
building materials prior to demolition or renovation activity. Under NESHAP, asbestos-containing
building materials are classified as either friable, Category I non-friable or Category II non-friable
ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to
powder by hand pressure. Category I non friable ACM includes packing materials, gaskets,
resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1 percent (%)
asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM are non-friable materials other than Category I materials
that contain more than 1% asbestos.
Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has
become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and
which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated demolition activities are considered
regulated ACM (RACM). RACM must be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities.
In the state of South Carolina, asbestos activities are regulated by the SCDHEC under the
SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects (Effective June 27,
2008). The SCDHEC require that any asbestos-related activity conducted in a public building be
Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report Curtiss-Wright Hangar ■ Columbia, SC June 30, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. 73117715
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3
performed by personnel licensed by the SCDHEC. The owner or operator must provide the
SCDHEC with written notification of planned removal activities at least 10 working days prior to
the commencement of asbestos abatement activities. Asbestos abatement must be performed by
SCDHEC-licensed asbestos abatement contractors in accordance with a Project Design prepared
by a SCDHEC-licensed Asbestos Consultant. Third-party air monitoring must be conducted
during the abatement activities.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard for Construction
Industry (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard
requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos
fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc). The OSHA standard classifies construction and
maintenance activities, which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions
which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work.
3.2 Visual Assessment
Our survey activities began with visual observation of the interior and exterior of the building to
identify apparent homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area consists of building
materials, which appear similar throughout in terms of color, texture and date of application.
Building materials which were not identified as concrete, glass, wood, masonry, metal or rubber
were considered suspect ACM. The exterior survey included an assessment of the exterior
walls and roof.
3.3 Physical Assessment
A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the
friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a material,
which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Friability
was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.
3.4 Sample Collection
Based on the results of the visual sampling, bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in
general accordance with AHERA sample collection protocols. Random samples of suspect
materials were collected in each homogeneous area. Bulk samples were collected using wet
methods as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed in sealable
containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.
Fifty-nine (59) bulk samples were collected from areas of suspect ACM in the buildings. The bulk
samples were collected from the following interior and exterior materials:
Window glazing Black roof tar flashing
Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report Curtiss-Wright Hangar ■ Columbia, SC June 30, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. 73117715
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4
Deck tar
Thin window felt
Thick window felt
Metal roof insulating layer
Pipe elbow insulation
Black 9” floor tile and mastic
Gray roof flashing
Plaster and skim coat
Wire wrap
Silver paint
Pipe insulation
White 9” floor tile and mastic
A summary of the suspect ACM samples collected during the survey is presented in Table 1 in
Appendix A.
3.5 Sample Analysis
Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) of
Charlotte, North Carolina for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion
staining techniques per EPA methodology (40 CFR 763, Subpart F). The percentage of asbestos,
where applicable, was determined by microscopical visual estimation. EMSL is accredited under
the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program NVLAP (#200841-0). Layered analysis
of samples was conducted by the lab to separate the tile and mastic and plaster base coat and
finish.
Per the SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects (effective
June 27, 2008), negative results for non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials such as
flooring and roofing shall be verified with at least one TEM analysis.
None of the NOB materials tested negative for asbestos by PLM analysis and thus no TEM
analysis was required.
3.6 Finding and Recommendations
Based on the results of laboratory analyses, the following materials tested positive for asbestos:
Window glazing
Deck tar
Thin window felt
Thick window felt
Metal roof insulating layer
Pipe elbow insulation
Black roof tar flashing
Gray roof flashing
Pipe insulation
White 9” floor tile and mastic
Black 9” floor tile and mastic
Table 1 in the Appendix A summarizes the results of the visual inspection, estimated quantities,
and laboratory analyses. Asbestos laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B.
Terracon recommends removal of the asbestos-containing materials by a South Carolina licensed
asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation of the building.
Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report Curtiss-Wright Hangar ■ Columbia, SC June 30, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. 73117715
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5
It should be noted that suspect materials, other than those identified during the June 23, 2011
survey may exist within the structure. Should suspect materials other than those which were
identified during this survey be uncovered during or prior to the abatement and demolition
process, those materials should be assumed asbestos-containing until sampling and analysis can
confirm or refute their asbestos content. Should future sampling indicate that the roof system, or
other material, is asbestos containing, Terracon recommends removal of the asbestos-containing
materials by a South Carolina licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation of the
building.
4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY
4.1 Regulatory Overview
Lead is regulated by the EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA. The EPA and SCDHEC regulate lead use,
removal, and disposal, and OSHA regulates lead exposure to workers. The EPA defines LBP
as paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that contains lead equal to or greater than 1.0
mg/cm2, 5,000 mg/kg, or 0.5% by dry weight as determined by laboratory analysis. The
SCDHEC regulations require that painted demolition debris with a lead concentration greater
than 0.06% by weight be disposed in a permitted Class II landfill. For the purpose of the OSHA
lead standard, lead includes metallic lead, all inorganic lead compounds, and organic lead
soaps. A synopsis of the OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926.62) and the applicability are as
follows:
The OSHA Interim Lead Standard for Construction (29 CFR 1926.62) applies to all construction
work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. All work related to
construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) is included. The lead-in-
construction standard applies to any detectable concentration of lead in paint, as even small
concentrations of lead can result in unacceptable employee exposures depending upon on the
method of removal and other workplace conditions. Under this standard, construction includes,
but is not limited to, the following:
Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present
Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead
New construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions
containing lead, or materials containing lead
Installation of products containing lead
Lead contamination/emergency clean-up
Transportation, disposal, storage, or containment of lead or materials containing lead on
the site or location at which construction activities are performed
Maintenance operations associated with construction activities described above
Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report Curtiss-Wright Hangar ■ Columbia, SC June 30, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. 73117715
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 6
4.2 Sampling and Analytical Protocol
Mr. Partin of Terracon conducted the lead based paint (LBP) sampling on June 23, 2011. The
LBP sampling was conducted by collecting paint chip samples. The paint chip samples were
collected from painted or lacquered surfaces of building components likely to contain LBP,
based on apparent date of application. The paint samples were collected down to the surface
substrate so as to include any underlying paint systems in the analysis. The random paint chip
samples were selected based on current paint schemes and may not be inclusive of old paint
systems covered with paneling, or existing painted systems. The paint chip samples were
submitted to an ELAP approved laboratory for analysis of lead by NIOSH Method 7082M
(atomic absorption).
4.3 Sample Collection
Nine paint samples were collected from interior and exterior painted surfaces on the building.
Paint sampled included:
Light green interior
Grey interior
Grey exterior
Light blue interior
Black interior
Beige interior
White bathroom interior
Grey bathroom interior
Red interior
4.4 Findings and Recommendations
Lead was detected above the SCDHEC 0.06% regulatory limit in all of the samples collected
from the hangar. Lead concentrations ranged from 0.25% by weight to 12% by weight. If any of
the interior painted materials are to be removed during renovation activities, SCDHEC
regulations require that lead painted construction debris be disposed in a permitted Class II
landfill. Additionally, the provisions in the OSHA Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) should be
followed by contractor personnel conducting work activity during the demolition. A summary of
the lead paint laboratory results is presented in Table 2 in Appendix A. The analytical report is
included in Appendix B.
5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS
This survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same
locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are
based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information contained in this
report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be relied upon
Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report Curtiss-Wright Hangar ■ Columbia, SC June 30, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. 73117715
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7
to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively
for use by the Congaree Coalition and Richland County for specific application to their project as
discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this
report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed
necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third
parties supplying information, which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No
warranty, express or implied is made.
APPENDIX A
TABLES
HA
Approx. Quantity
(ft2)Sample Number Description Sample Location Lab Result Category Condition
1.1 window glazing window 2% Chry Cat II Damaged1 500 1.2 window glazing window 2% Chry Cat II Damaged
1.3 window glazing window 2% Chry Cat II Damaged2.1 tar deck 3% Chry Cat I Damaged
2 40 2.2 tar deck 3% Chry Cat I Damaged2.3 tar deck 3% Chry Cat I Damaged3.1 felt, bottom window wall above deck 20% Chry Cat II Damaged
3 200 3.2 felt, bottom window wall above deck 20% Chry Cat II Damaged3.3 felt, bottom window wall above deck 20% Chry Cat II Damaged4.1 felt, top window wall above deck 30% Chry Cat II Damaged
4 200 4.2 felt, top window wall above deck 30% Chry Cat II Damaged4.3 felt, top window wall above deck 30% Chry Cat II Damaged5.1 corrugated insulating roof layer roof 30% Chry Cat II Damaged
5 8,450 5.2 corrugated insulating roof layer roof 30% Chry Cat II Damaged5.3 corrugated insulating roof layer roof 30% Chry Cat II Damaged6.1 roof flashing, around pipe roof 5% Chry Cat I Damaged
6 25 6.2 roof flashing, around pipe roof 5% Chry Cat I Damaged6.3 roof flashing, around pipe roof 5% Chry Cat I Damaged7.1 roof flashing, at roof/wall roof 10% Chry Cat I Damaged
7 100 7.2 roof flashing, at roof/wall roof 10% Chry Cat I Damaged7.3 roof flashing, at roof/wall roof 20% Chry Cat I Damaged
TABLE 1 - Asbestos Sample SummaryCurtiss-Wright Hangar
Columbia, South CarolinaProject No. 73117715
Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
HA
Approx. Quantity
(ft2)Sample Number Description Sample Location Lab Result Category Condition
TABLE 1 - Asbestos Sample SummaryCurtiss-Wright Hangar
Columbia, South CarolinaProject No. 73117715
Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
8.1 plaster, skim coat front room NAD SM Damaged
8.1 plaster, rough coat front room NAD SM Damaged8.2 plaster, skim coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.2 plaster, rough coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.3 plaster, skim coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.3 plaster, rough coat middle room NAD SM Damaged
8 2,000 8.4 plaster, skim coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.4 plaster, rough coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.5 plaster, skim coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.5 plaster, rough coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.6 plaster, skim coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.6 plaster, rough coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.7 plaster, skim coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.7 plaster, rough coat middle room NAD SM Damaged
9.1 wire insulation middle room NAD Misc Damaged
9 200 LF 9.2 wire insulation hangar NAD Misc Damaged9.3 wire insulation hangar NAD Misc Damaged
10.1 silver paint boiler room NAD Misc Damaged10 400 10.2 silver paint boiler room NAD Misc Damaged
10.3 silver paint boiler room NAD Misc Damaged
11.1 pipe insulation boiler room 80% Chry RACM Damaged11 20 11.2 pipe insulation boiler room 80% Chry RACM Damaged
11.3 pipe insulation boiler room 90% Chry RACM Damaged12.1 elbow insulation boiler room 50% Chry RACM Damaged
12 15 12.2 elbow insulation boiler room 50% Chry RACM Damaged12.3 elbow insulation boiler room 50% Chry RACM Damaged
HA
Approx. Quantity
(ft2)Sample Number Description Sample Location Lab Result Category Condition
TABLE 1 - Asbestos Sample SummaryCurtiss-Wright Hangar
Columbia, South CarolinaProject No. 73117715
Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
13.1 9"x9" floor tile, black middle room 15% Chry Cat I Damaged13.1 mastic with above middle room 3% Chry Cat I Damaged
13 25 13.2 9"x9" floor tile, black middle room 15% Chry Cat I Damaged13.2 mastic with above middle room 3% Chry Cat I Damaged13.3 9"x9" floor tile, black middle room 15% Chry Cat I Damaged13.3 mastic with above middle room 3% Chry Cat I Damaged
14.1 9"x9" floor tile, white middle room 10% Chry Cat I Damaged
14.1 mastic with above middle room 2% Chry Cat I Damaged14 25 14.2 9"x9" floor tile, white middle room 10% Chry Cat I Damaged
14.2 mastic with above middle room 2% Chry Cat I Damaged14.3 9"x9" floor tile, white middle room 10% Chry Cat I Damaged14.3 mastic with above middle room 2% Chry Cat I Damaged
NotesHA Homogeneous Area
NAD No asbestos detectedPLM Polarized Light MicroscopySM Surfacing MaterialTSI Thermal System InsulationMisc Miscellaneous Material
F FriableNF Non-Friable
Chry Chrysotile asbestosCat I asbestos containing packings, gaskets, asphaltic roofing products, resilient flooring, pliable sealants and pliable masticsCat II non friable materials other than Category IRACM Regulated Asbestos Containing Material
Sample Number Description Location Lab Result
LP-1 light green interior 6.8%LP-2 grey exterior 8%LP-3 grey interior 12%LP-4 light blue interior 1.5%LP-5 black interior 4.1%LP-6 beige interior 0.25%LP-7 white bathroom 0.81%LP-8 grey bathroom 3%LP-9 red interior 3.3%
Note:Results in boldface indicate concentration above the SCDHEC regulatory limit (0.06%)Painted construction debris should be disposed in a Class II Landfill
Columbia, South CarolinaProject No. 73117715
TABLE 2 - Lead Paint Sample SummaryCurtiss-Wright Hangar
Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY REPORTS
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
1.1
411102029-0001
window glazing Gray/Tan
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile2%Fibrous (other)2% Non-fibrous (other)96%
1.2
411102029-0002
window glazing Gray/Tan
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile2%Fibrous (other)2% Non-fibrous (other)96%
1.3
411102029-0003
window glazing Gray/Tan
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile2%Fibrous (other)2% Non-fibrous (other)96%
2.1
411102029-0004
tar on deck Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile3%Cellulose20% Non-fibrous (other)77%
2.2
411102029-0005
tar on deck Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile3%Cellulose15% Non-fibrous (other)82%
2.3
411102029-0006
tar on deck Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile3%Cellulose20% Non-fibrous (other)77%
1
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
3.1
411102029-0007
felt bottom of
windows
Brown/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile20%Non-fibrous (other)80%
3.2
411102029-0008
felt bottom of
windows
Brown/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile20%Non-fibrous (other)80%
3.3
411102029-0009
felt bottom of
windows
Brown/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile20%Non-fibrous (other)80%
4.1
411102029-0010
felt top of windows Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile30%Cellulose3% Non-fibrous (other)67%
4.2
411102029-0011
felt top of windows Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile30%Cellulose3% Non-fibrous (other)67%
4.3
411102029-0012
felt top of windows Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile30%Non-fibrous (other)70%
2
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
5.1
411102029-0013
felt layer under
metal roof
Brown/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile30%Non-fibrous (other)70%
5.2
411102029-0014
felt layer under
metal roof
Brown/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile30%Non-fibrous (other)70%
5.3
411102029-0015
felt layer under
metal roof
Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile30%Non-fibrous (other)70%
6.1
411102029-0016
roof flashing
around pipe
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile5%Non-fibrous (other)95%
6.2
411102029-0017
roof flashing
around pipe
Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile5%Non-fibrous (other)95%
6.3
411102029-0018
roof flashing
around pipe
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile5%Non-fibrous (other)95%
3
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
7.1
411102029-0019
roof flashing at
roof/wall
Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile10%Non-fibrous (other)90%
7.2
411102029-0020
roof flashing at
roof/wall
Brown
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile10%Non-fibrous (other)90%
7.3
411102029-0021
roof flashing at
roof/wall
Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile20%Non-fibrous (other)80%
8.1-Skim Coat
411102029-0022
plaster/skim coat White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.1-Rough Coat
411102029-0022A
plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.2-Skim Coat
411102029-0023
plaster/skim coat White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
4
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
8.2-Rough Coat
411102029-0023A
plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.3-Skim Coat
411102029-0024
plaster/skim coat White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.3-Rough Coat
411102029-0024A
plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.4-Skim Coat
411102029-0025
plaster/skim coat White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.4-Rough Coat
411102029-0025A
plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.5-Skim Coat
411102029-0026
plaster/skim coat White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
5
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
8.5-Rough Coat
411102029-0026A
plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.6-Skim Coat
411102029-0027
plaster/skim coat White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.6-Rough Coat
411102029-0027A
plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.7-Skim Coat
411102029-0028
plaster/skim coat White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
8.7-Rough Coat
411102029-0028A
plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
9.1
411102029-0029
wire insulation Brown/Tan None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose50%
Glass30%
Non-fibrous (other)20%
6
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
9.2
411102029-0030
wire insulation Brown/Tan None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose50%
Glass30%
Non-fibrous (other)20%
9.3
411102029-0031
wire insulation Brown None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose50%
Glass30%
Non-fibrous (other)20%
10.1
411102029-0032
silver paint boiler
room
Silver None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
10.2
411102029-0033
silver paint boiler
room
Silver None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
10.3
411102029-0034
silver paint boiler
room
Silver None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
11.1
411102029-0035
pipe insulation Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile80%Non-fibrous (other)20%
7
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
11.2
411102029-0036
pipe insulation Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile80%Non-fibrous (other)20%
11.3
411102029-0037
pipe insulation Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile90%Non-fibrous (other)10%
12.1
411102029-0038
elbow insulation Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile50%Non-fibrous (other)50%
12.2
411102029-0039
elbow insulation Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile50%Non-fibrous (other)50%
12.3
411102029-0040
elbow insulation Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile50%Non-fibrous (other)50%
13.1-Floor Tile
411102029-0041
black 9x9 floor tile Brown
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile15%Non-fibrous (other)85%
8
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
13.1-Mastic
411102029-0041A
black 9x9 floor tile Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile3%Non-fibrous (other)97%
13.2-Floor Tile
411102029-0042
black 9x9 floor tile Brown
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile15%Non-fibrous (other)85%
13.2-Mastic
411102029-0042A
black 9x9 floor tile Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile3%Non-fibrous (other)97%
13.3-Floor Tile
411102029-0043
black 9x9 floor tile Brown
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile15%Non-fibrous (other)85%
13.3-Mastic
411102029-0043A
black 9x9 floor tile Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile3%Non-fibrous (other)97%
14.1-Floor Tile
411102029-0044
white 9x9 floor tile Brown
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile10%Non-fibrous (other)90%
9
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Sample Description Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
411102029
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM
Curtis-Wright Hangar
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
6/28/2011Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]
14.1-Mastic
411102029-0044A
white 9x9 floor tile Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile2%Cellulose15% Non-fibrous (other)83%
14.2-Floor Tile
411102029-0045
white 9x9 floor tile Brown
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile10%Non-fibrous (other)90%
14.2-Mastic
411102029-0045A
white 9x9 floor tile Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile2%Cellulose15% Non-fibrous (other)83%
14.3-Floor Tile
411102029-0046
Tan
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile10%Non-fibrous (other)90%
14.3-Mastic
411102029-0046A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile2%Cellulose10% Non-fibrous (other)88%
10
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325
Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)
Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50
Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID AnalyzedLead
Collected
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
706 Gralin Street, Kernersville, NC 27284
Phone: (336) 992-1025 Fax: (336) 992-4175 Email: [email protected]
021103838
Attn: Gene Partin
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
521 Clemson Road
Columbia, SC 29229
Customer PO:
Received: 06/27/11 9:30 AM
Curtis-Wright Hanger
Customer ID: GAGE62
Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)
0001LP-1 6.8 % wt6/28/2011
0002LP-2 8.0 % wt6/28/2011
0003LP-3 12 % wt6/28/2011
0004LP-4 1.5 % wt6/28/2011
0005LP-5 4.1 % wt6/28/2011
0006LP-6 0.25 % wt6/28/2011
0007LP-7 0.81 % wt6/28/2011
0008LP-8 3.0 % wt6/28/2011
0009LP-9 3.3 % wt6/28/2011
Page 1 of 1
James Cole, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 4:24:52 PM
Reporting limit is 0.01 % wt. The QC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method QC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. * slight modifications to methods applied.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Kernersville, NC AIHA-LAP, LLC--ELLAP Lab 102564
Initial report from 06/28/2011 16:24:52
APPENDIX C
INSPECTOR’S CREDENTIALS
APPENDIX D
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
Curtiss-Wright Hangar Project No. 73117715 Photos Taken: June 23, 2011 Terracon
Photo #1 View of the hangar exterior Photo #2 View of the hangar interior
Photo #3 View of the east wing front room
with plaster on walls Photo #4 View of the east wing middle room
with tile (floor near plywood)
Photo #5 View of the east wing bathroom Photo #6 View of the roof of the east wing
Curtiss-Wright Hangar Project No. 73117715 Photos Taken: June 23, 2011 Terracon
Photo #7 View of the hangar roof Photo #8 Close up view of hangar roof
showing corrugated layer and flashing strip at top of window
Photo #9 View of the boiler with pipe
insulation Photo #10 View of the coal storage room and
chute
Photo #11 View of the hanger exterior
showing windows Photo #12 View of sliding metal door on
hangar’s north side
Form 111—6/98