+ All Categories
Transcript
Page 1: Asset based financing

Introduction

The traditional financing is related to the liability side of the balance sheet. The

firm issues long-term debt or equity to meet its financing needs, and in the

process, expands its capitalization. The dangers of traditional financing are that

equity becomes an expensive method of financing because of decreasing

corporate earnings and low price ratios.

The high rate of inflation causes long-term debt that is an expensive source of

financing as interest rates rise. The corporate finance managers therefore are

developing financing alternatives related to the asset side of the balance sheet.

These alternatives may lower the cost and redistribute the risk. Asset based

financing uses assets as direct security. There are 3 main types:

Lease

Hire purchase

Project financing

1

Page 2: Asset based financing

Lease Financing

Leasing is used widely in the western countries to finance investments. USA has

the largest leasing industry in the world and lease financing contributes

approximately one third of total business investments. In the changing economic

and financial environment of India, it has assumed an important role.

What is lease?Lease is a contract between a lessor, the owner of the asset, and a lesse, the

user of the asset. Under the contract, the owner gives the right to use the asset

to the user over an agreed period of time for a consideration called the lease rental. The lessee pays the rental to the lessor as regular fixed payments over a

period of time at the beginning or at the end of a month, quarter, half-tear or a

year. Although generally fixed, the amount and timing of payment of lease rentals

can be tailored to the lessee’s profit or cash flows. In up-fronted leases, more

rentals are charged in the initial years and less in the later years of the contract.

The opposite happens in back-ended leases. At the end of the lease contract, the

asset reverts to the lessor, who is the legal owner of the asset. As the legal

owner, it is the lessor and not the lesse, who is entitled to claims depreciation on

the leased asset. In long-term lease contracts, the lesse is generally given an

option to buy or renew the lease. Sometimes, the lease contract is divided into 2

parts- primary lease and secondary lease for the purpose of lease rentals.

Primary lease provides for the recovery of the cost of the asset and profit through

lease rentals during a period of about 4-5 years. A perpetual, secondary lease

may follow it on nominal lease rentals. Various other combinations are possible.

2

Page 3: Asset based financing

Although the lessor is the legal owner of a leased asset, the lesse bears the risk

and enjoys the returns. The lesse benefits if the leased assets operates

profitably, and suffer if the asset fails to perform. Leasing separates ownership

and use as 2 economic activities and facilities asset use without ownership. A

lesse can be individual firm or a firm interested in the use of an asset without

owning. Lessor may be a equipment manufacturer or leasing companies who

bring together the manufacture and the users. In USA equipment manufacturers

are the largest group of lessor followed by banks. In India, independent leasing

companies form the major group in number in the leasing industry. Banks

together with financial institutions such as the Industrial Credit and Investment

Corporation of India are the largest group in terms of the volume of business.

Three party lease

1st party

Equipment

2nd party Equipment

3rd party

3

Lessor

Lessee

Manufacturer

or dealer

Page 4: Asset based financing

Types of leases

Two types of leases can be distinguished.

Operating lease

Financial lease

4

Page 5: Asset based financing

Operating lease:

Short term, cancelable lease agreements are called operating leases.

Convenience and services are the hallmarks of operating leases.

Example: a tourist renting a car, lease contracts for computers, office equipment,

car, trucks, and hotel rooms. For assets such as computers or office equipment,

an operating lease may run for 3-5 years. The lessor is generally responsible for

maintenance and insurance. He may also provide other services. A single

operating lease contract may not fully amortize the original cost of the asset; it

covers a period considerably shorter than the useful life of the asset. Because of

the short duration and the lessee’s option to cancel the lease, the risk of

obsolescence remains with the lessor. Naturally the shorter the lease period

and/or higher the risk of obsolescence, the higher will be the lease rentals.

Financial leaseLong-term, non-cancelable lease contracts are known as financial leases.

Example: plant, machinery, land, building, and aircrafts, in India financial leases

are very popular with high-cost and high technology equipment. Financial leases

amortize the cost of the asset over the term of lease; they are, therefore also

called capital of full-payout leases. Most financial leases are direct leases. The

lessor buys the asset identified by the lesse from the manufacturer and signs a

contract to lease it out to the lesse.

Sale and lease back Sometimes a user may sell an (existing) asset owned by him to the lessor

(leasing company) and lease it back from him. Such a sale and lease back

arrangements may provide substantial tax benefits. For example in 1989,

Shipping credit and Investment Corporation of India purchased Great Eastern

Company’s bulk carrier, Jag Lata for Rs.12.5 crore and then leased it back to the

5

Page 6: Asset based financing

Great Eastern on a five year lease, the rentals being Rs.28.13 lakhs per month.

The sip’s written down book value was Rs. 2.5 crore.

In financial lease, the maintenance and insurance are normally the responsibility

of the lesse. The lesse also bears the risk of obsolescence. A financial lease

agreement may provide for renewal of contract or purchase of the asset by the

lesse after the contract expires. The option of purchasing the leased asset by the

lesse is not incorporated in the lease contract in India, because if such an option

is provided the lease is legally constructed to be a hire purchase agreement.

Cash flow consequences of a financial leaseA financial lease has cash flow consequences. It is a way of normal financing for

a company. Suppose a company has found it financially worthwhile to acquire an

equipment costing rs. 9 crore. The equipment is estimated to last eight years.

Instead of buying the company can lease the equipment for eight years at an

annual lease rental of Rs.1.6 crore from its manufacturer. The company will have

to provide for the maintenance, insurance, and other operating expenses

associated with the use of the asset in both alternatives-lease and buying. The

following are the consequences:

Avoidance of the purchase price- The company can acquire the asset

without immediately paying for it. Cash outflow saved is equivalent to a

cash inflow; there is a cash inflow of Rs. 8 crore.

Loss of depreciation tax shield – Depreciation is a deductible expense

and saves taxes. Depreciation tax shield is equal to the amount of

depreciation multiplied by the tax rate for each of the eight years. The

company will lose a series of depreciation tax shields when it takes the

lease.

Thus cash flow consequences depend upon the company and the nature of its

business transactions.

6

Page 7: Asset based financing

Advantages of Leasing

If an asset is needed for a short period, leasing makes sense. Buying an

asset and arranging to resell after use is time consuming, inconvenient

and costly. Long-term financial leases also offer flexibility to the user. In

India borrowing from banks and financial institutions involve long,

complicated procedures. Institutions often put restrictions on borrowers,

stipulate conversion of loan into equity and appoint nominee directors on

the board. Financial leases are less restrictive and can be negotiated

faster, especially if the leasing industry is well developed. Yet another

advantage of a lease is the flexibility it provides to tailor lease payments to

the lessee’s cash flows. Such tailored payment schedules are helpful to a

lease that has fluctuating cash flows. New or small companies in non-

priority sectors, such as confectionaries, bottlers and distilleries find it

difficult to raise funds from banks and financial institutions in India.

When the technology embedded I the assets, as in a computer is subject

to rapid and unpredictable changes, a lessee can, through a short-term

cancelable lease, shift the risk of obsolescence to the lessor. A

manufacturer-lessor, or a specialized leasing company, is usually in a

better position than the user to assume the risk of obsolescence and

manage the fast advancing technology. Specialized leasing companies

are emerging in India, for example The Standard Leasing Company

leases medical equipments, the Apple leasing company leases computers

and the Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India specializes

in leasing for technology development. In fact in such situations the lessee

is buying an insurance against obsolescence, paying a premium in terms

of higher lease rentals.

7

Page 8: Asset based financing

With a full service, a lessee can look for advantages in maintenance and

specialized services. For example computer manufacturers who lease out

computers are better equipped than the user to provide effective

maintenance and specialized services. Their cost too may be less than

what the lessee would have to incur if he were to maintain the leased

asset. The lessor is able to provide maintenance and other services

cheaply because of his larger volume and specialization. He may pass on

a part of that advantage to the lessee.

Certain types of lease financing are not shown on the balance sheet of the

lessee. Therefore these leases do not raise the debt equity ratio nor impair

the borrowing capacity of the firm. The current and acid test ratios are not

affected by operating leases either.

Lease financing conserves working capital. Leases typically require a

smaller down payment than do installment loans. Moreover, unlike many

bank loans, no compensating balances are required. Delivery and

installation charges can often be included as part of each future lease

payment which also conserves working capital.

Since cash flow is a prime concern in most businesses, opting the lease

route is beneficial because it does not require the initial outflow of funds

for sales tax, as would the purchase. Some states levy a sales tax as high

as 10%. Clearly this has a significantly undesirable impact o cash flow.

Leasing permits postponement of taxes because sales tax is charged as a

percentage of each future lease payment.

Generally one of the criteria used by a lessor in determining the lease

price is level of usage of the asset by the lessee. If the lessee expects to

use the asset more than average, leasing the asset may prove beneficial.

8

Page 9: Asset based financing

Disadvantages of Lease Financing

Some leases do require down payments in the form of lease or rental

payments in advance. The number of advance payments is partially

determined by the riskiness of the lessee. If a borrower has a well

established working relationship with a bank then the terms of an

installment loan can be structured to match the term of any competing

lease arrangement, including no down payment and financing of delivery

and installation charges as part of the equipment loan.

Some states levy a sales tax on the monthly lease payment. This tax is

usually included as a part of the periodic payment. Since the monthly

payment includes maintenance and implicit interest costs, more sales tax

is being paid over the life of the lease than if the tax was levied on the

purchase price only. In effect sales tax is being paid on maintenance and

interest. However the after tax present value of these costs in many cases

is less than paying the total sales taxes due at the inception of the lease.

Although it is true that lessors consider the expected usage in their profit

calculations, their returns are usually sufficiently large to provide a

“cushion”. Consequently it is unlikely that the lessee will be able to gain

any real advantage from excess usage. Even if the lessor has been taken

advantage of, it will probably happen only once.

A lease should require the same capital budgeting analysis as a purchase

since both are basically alternative forms of financing. If timing is so critical

then the capital budgeting department had best shorten its processing

time. Such action would be preferable to transacting leases without proper

analysis.

9

Page 10: Asset based financing

Tax advantages exist only if the lessee can take advantage of the

additional tax shield offered by the lease agreement. In fact there are

generally more tax advantages to buying than leasing since the buyer can

use accelerated depreciation and obtain an investment tax credit and

deduct the interest portion of debt installments.

Although leasing might be more steady and predictable in terms of cash

outflow than short-term financing, it is less desirable than long-term bond

financing. Bonds are frequently issued at lower interest rates than the

interest implicit in leases, and bonds are not required to be paid off for

periods of 15-20 years.

The lessee will benefit from relinquished tax benefits only if the lessor

passes on the resulting savings in the form of lower lease payments. All

too often these tax savings are not passed on to the lessee.

It is important to note that the lessor also assumes the risk of

obsolescence and therefore builds this into the cost of the lease payment.

Obsolescence is frequently over emphasized. Many outdated computers

are still doing the work they were intended for. Purchasing might therefore

might cost less than leasing if obsolescence is not considered a real threat

or problem.

Unless the lessor can pass on to the lessee economies derived from

access to secondary markets, quantity discounts and intensive use of

maintenance facilities, such leases usually offer very little real savings.

A lease that contains a variable residual is preferable to a variable

payment lease. Nevertheless such leases are still expensive alternatives

to buying or to leasing under a conventional fixed payment lease.

10

Page 11: Asset based financing

Risk Assessment of a Lessee

The first step in structuring a lease is for the lessor to evaluate and then

quantify the risk inherent in the lease. Risk results from the degree of credit

worthiness of the lessee combined with the collateral and residual value of

the equipment to be leased.

In general if the lessor deems a lease risky, any of the following variables

might be affected:

1. Lease yield increased with all other factors except payment amount

remaining constant

2. Additional advance payments required.

3. Security deposit required or increased.

4. Guaranteed residual required in lieu of a purchase option.

5. Lease term shortened.

6. Personal guarantee required.

7. Additional collateral beyond the leased equipment.

8. Increased late fees for delinquent rental payments (5% if 10 days late plus

18% interest for e.g.)

9. Security interest obtained to facilitate repossession

10.All insurable risk insured.

11

Page 12: Asset based financing

Assignment of the risk inherent in a lease transaction is primarily a credit

worthiness decision. Many lessors as well as bankers or other moneylenders

base their evaluation of risk on the 10 C’s. They are:

Character

Capacity

Capital

Credit

Conditions

Competition

Collateral

Cross-border

Complexity

Currency

12

Page 13: Asset based financing

Lessor Requirements

Once the lessor has assessed the risk and credit worthiness of the lessee and

converted that into structuring variables, the lessor must look to its remaining

needs and then to the requirements of the lessee. Meeting the sometimes

conflicting needs of the lessor and lessee represents the more difficult part of

lease structuring. Sometimes a lessor will insist on structuring an operating

lease in order to retain tax benefits while at the same time the lessee desires a

capital lease so it too may avail itself of the depreciation and tax benefits.

Typical lessor requirements that might be at variance with lessee needs in

lease structuring are:

A yield sufficient to meet the lessor’s after-tax weighted cost of capital

Accounting for the lease on the lessor’s books as a capital lease.

Tax structure of the agreement as an operating lease to obtain tax

benefits.

A net lease rather than a full service lease

Residual dependence- the lessor may want the equipment purchased by

the lessee to avoid resale problems. On the other hand the lessor may

want the equipment returned at the end of the lease due to its increased

value.

13

Page 14: Asset based financing

Leveraged lease

Under a leveraged lease, four parties are involved: the manufacturer of the asset,

the lessor, the lender from whom the lessor borrows a substantial portion of the

asset’s purchase price and the lessee. In a direct lease, the lessor buys the asset

and becomes the owner by making the full payment of the asset. In a leveraged

lease, the lessor makes substantial borrowing, even up to 80% of the asset’s

purchase price. He provides the remaining amount- 20% or so as equity to

become the owner. The lessor claims all tax benefits related to the ownership of

the asset. Lenders, generally the large financial institutions provide loans on a

non-recourse basis to the lessor. Their debt is serviced exclusively out of the

lease proceeds. To secure the loan provided by lenders, the lessor also agrees

to give them a shortage on the asset. Thus lenders have the first claim on the

lease payments together with the collateral on the asset. Lenders will take

charge of the asset if the lessee is unable to make lease payments.

Leveraged lease is called so because the high no-recourse debt creates a high

degree of leverage. The effect is to amplify the return of the equity-holder ie the

lessor. But the risk is also quite high if the lease payments are not received.

Leverage lease is quite useful for large capital equipment with long economic life

say 20 years or more. It is one of the popular means of financing large

infrastructure projects.

14

Page 15: Asset based financing

Steps in the formation of a lease contract

The lessee decides on the precise nature of type of equipment that he

proposes to purchase.

The lessee then approaches the manufacturers or vendors who deal in the

equipment required and begins negotiations

The lessee simultaneously makes an application to a lessor stating his

intention to enter into a lease agreement. The lessee may approach more

than one lessor, in which case negotiations are carried out and a lessor

offering the most convenient terms is chosen.

The lessee completes negotiations with the supplier or suppliers, as the

case may be, and the purchase agreement is communicated to the lessor.

The lessee is expected to furnish such details to the lessor as: the

specification of the equipment, the price, the terms of payment, terms of

warranties, delivery period, installation costs, and other costs pertaining to

the equipment into operation.

The negotiations between the lessor and the lessee are finalized with

respect to the length of the lease period, the distribution of rentals over the

period, the amount of rentals to be collected and the mechanism of

collecting rentals.

The lessee is then allowed to take the possession of the asset, for which,

the necessary ownership papers are processed in favor of the lessor. The

lessor undertakes to pay the supplier on the terms agreed to between the

supplier and the lessee. The lessee in turn undertakes to take full

15

Page 16: Asset based financing

responsibility for the performance of the equipment. To this end the lessee

is expected to provide a certificate to the lessor, that the lessee has

inspected the equipment and that it is as per the specifications asked for.

The lessee is further expected to certify that the equipment is in good

working condition and that it can be used for the purpose for which it was

obtained.

The lessor makes the payment to the supplier and lessee takes the

possession of the asset. The lessee continues thereafter to discharge his

obligation under the lease agreement.

16

Page 17: Asset based financing

The structure of a lease agreement

A lease agreement is a statement indicating the intention of the parties

concerned and a document providing the terms and conditions under which the

performance of the intention is to be undertaken. A lease agreement therefore is

a set of self-made and mutually acceptable rules of a commercial transaction that

is consistent with law.

Most lease agreements contain the following provisions:

1) The lease transaction

2) Title, identification, and ownership of the asset

3) Costs of maintenance and use

4) Liabilities of lessee

5) Liabilities of lessor

6) Default of lessees

7) Remedies in the event of default

8) Arbitration

17

Page 18: Asset based financing

(1) The lease transaction: The central part of every lease transaction pertains to

the lease rental, terms of payment, and the period of lease. The lease rental is

normally a matter of negotiation and is determined by such factors as the current

market rate of lease rental and the period of the lease. It goes without saying that

the lease rental must in itself reflect the economics of commercial viability on the

part of the lessor and the lessees. The terms of payment cover such factors as

the mode of payment, the periodic intervals, the precise amounts becoming due

at various due dates and so on. The period of the lease states the period in terms

of days, or months, or years as being the period during which the lessee has a

right to use the asset subject to the conditions of the lease being fulfilled. Both

the period of the lease and the terms of payment have an effect on the lease

rental determination.

In the case of financial leases, the normal practice is to restrict the lease

period to eight years, where investment is available, which is consistent with the

carry-forward period available under the income tax act.

(2) Title, ownership and identification of asset: The legal title of the asset

resides with the lessor. This is so stated explicitly in the agreement. Hence all

accounting charges associated with ownership are claimed by the lessor, which

is also explicitly provided in the agreement.

(3) Costs of maintenance and use: The costs of maintenance and use may

either be borne by the lessor or the lessee. In the case of financial leases the

maintenance costs are borne by the lessee and in the case of operating leases

the maintenance costs are borne by the lessor. The reasons for such differences

in the agreements relating to maintenance costs revolve around the term of the

contract. Financial leases being for relatively longer periods of time, one lessee

enjoys the best part of the asset’s useful economic life. Operating leases are for

relatively shorter periods of time and more than one lessee uses the asset over

its economic life.

18

Page 19: Asset based financing

(4) Liabilities of lessee: Express provisions highlighting the liabilities of the

lessees with respect to the implementation of the contract are provided. These

express provisions normally relate to insurance, quality of asset, safety, damage,

and surrender. In case of insurance the responsibility to pay insurance may rest

either with the lessor or the lessee. The traditions that have evolved however link

maintenance costs to insurance, in the sense that whoever bears the

maintenance costs also bears the insurance costs. In the case of financial leases

therefore the lessee ends up paying the insurance costs and enters a net lease

agreement. The lessor has an unconditional right to inspect the asset, and an

equally unconditional indemnity against any defect in the performance or

construction of the asset. The lessee in most cases is required to provide a

certificate that it has inspected the asset before any payment is effected. In its

use the lessor would not be responsible for any loss, theft or damage to the

asset. The lessee is expected to indemnify the lessor against such possibilities.

This may vary slightly with respect to operating leases of certain types (e.g. cars,

cycles etc.) where the lessor would be required to provide a reasonable

opportunity for inspection. In most cases however it would be the sole

responsibility of the lessee to inspect and pass the asset for use. Further every

lease-deed would contain an express clause that specifies the return of the asset

to the lessor unless the purchase option is exercised. This again is the

responsibility of the lessee, who undertakes to return the asset to a place desired

by the lessor at the end of the lease period.

(5) Liabilities of the lessor: normally lease deeds contain numerous clauses on

the lessee’s duties and responsibilities and virtually none fo the lessor. The

lessor’s responsibility starts and stops with the payment of the money for

acquiring the asset, and the lessor does not undertake any responsibility for the

performance, in the case of a financial lease. In the case of a contract hire, or

operating leases, the lessor is responsible for the upkeep of the asset. The

implied condition of hire is that the asset is fit for use. Thus in the case of a car

19

Page 20: Asset based financing

being hired on day-to-day basis the car must be in good working condition for

use. Some lease-deeds may also specify that the responsibility for actually

carrying out the maintenance and repairs on the asset rest with the lessee, while

the lessor simply undertakes to bear the cost. Such a method may seem

reasonable where maintenance activity schedules can be drawn up accurately.

E.g. if a machine needs to be oiled and greased for every 8 hours of operation,

such tasks can be undertaken by the lessee, rather than the lessor.

(6) Default of lessees: Lease agreements normally provide clauses specifying

the exact deeds or actions that will be constructed as default on the part of

lessees. Any of the following events may be termed as default:

Lessee fails to pay money due

Lessee fails to observe any covenant, condition, or agreement specifically

mentioned in the lease deed.

Lessee attempts to remove, sell, transfer, encumber, part with possession

or sublet without lessor’s consent.

Lessee becomes insolvent.

Lessee’s financial condition materially deteriorates and the lessor

considers the equipment to be insecure.

A lessee may be considered to have defaulted in an agreement, if with the

same lessor, the lessee has defaulted with any other agreement.

The lease agreements may provide for grace periods for payment of any

money, or for submitting any documents or papers. The normal practice followed

in the case of default is that the lessor sends a written notice by hand delivery or

20

Page 21: Asset based financing

by registered post specifying that the lessee is at fault, and this may or may not

be followed by reminders. The lease-deed specifies the precise procedure to be

followed in this regard.

(7) Remedies: The lease agreement provides also for the remedial action to be

undertaken in the event of default. Once the lessee has committed an act of

default, the provisions of the Contract Act 1872 govern further actions. The

underlying principles of remedies are that where there is a right, there must exist

a remedy for any breach of that right. A remedy is the means given by law for the

enforcement of a right.

As per the provisions of the Contract Act, in the case of a breach of

contract by one the assenting parties, the other party may:

Rescind the contract

Sue for damages

Sue for quantum merit

Sue for specific performance

Sue for an injunction

There exists a specific circumstance under which the aggrieved party has an

option to follow any specific course of action. Stemming from such authority

provided by law, lease agreements may have any or all the following remedial

actions specified in the deed.

21

Page 22: Asset based financing

The lessor with an interest that must be specified in default may claim the

amount.

All future rentals, including the purchase price option, if any becomes

payable to the lessor. A time period may be specified for such a payment.

The lessor may terminate the contract.

The lessor may demand that all equipment leased under the contract be

returned at the lessee’s risk and cost.

The lessor may also dispose of the equipment under the contract through

sale or any other form of transfer.

The lessor may also at its option waive a default, by an express provision to this

effect or by implication or by a written notice on the happening of the act of

default.

(8) Arbitration: The lessor and the lessee may agree to an arbitration procedure

in the case of any dispute. An arbitration agreement must be in writing to be

valid, though, it is not necessary to name the arbitrators at the time of drawing up

the lease deed. Matters pertaining to the process of arbitration are subject to the

Arbitration Act 1940.

(9) Miscellaneous provisions: In addition to the main points mentioned, the

lease deed may have other clauses on any major issue pertinent to the

transaction being undertaken. Further the manner in which the lease deed is to

be administered and the implementation of the contract may be specified. Thus it

may provide all communication between the lessor and the lessee be in the form

of registered post only as no verbal transmission of information would be given

22

Page 23: Asset based financing

cognizance. The lease deed so drawn would be the legal basis for any dispute

that may arise in the future and is the basis on which the performance of the

contract depends. Finally the lease agreement though bound by law in its

provisions can be a matter of traditions and customs. In the simplest terms the

parties entering into an agreement draw up the rules and regulations to which

their association would be subject to. These rules and regulations are contained

in the lease-deed. So long as they don’t infringe upon some legal prohibitions,

the concerned parties are free to make any rules of their choice.

23

Page 24: Asset based financing

Hire purchase financing

Hire purchase is a popular financing mechanism especially in certain sectors of

Indian business such as he automobile sector. In hire purchase financing, there

are three parties: the manufacturer, the hiree and the hirer. The hiree may be a

manufacturer or a finance company. The manufacturer sells asset to the hiree

who sells it to the hirer in exchange for the payment to be made over a specified

period of time.

A hire purchase agreement between the hirer and the hiree involves the following

three conditions:

The owner of the asset (the hiree or the manufacturer) gives the

possession of the asset to the hirer with an understanding that the hirer

will pay the agreed installments over a specified period of time.

The ownership of the asset will transfer to the hirer on the payment of all

installments.

The hirer will have the option of terminating the agreement any time

before the transfer of ownership of the asset.

Thus for the hirer the hire purchase agreement is like a cancelable lease with a

right to buy the asset. The hirer is required to show the hired asset on his

balance sheet and is entitled to claim depreciation, although he does not own the

asset until full payment has been made. The payment made by the hirer is

divided into two parts: interest charges and repayment of principal. The hirer thus

gets tax relief on interest paid and not the entire payment.

24

Page 25: Asset based financing

How does hire purchase work?

When a customer buys goods on hire purchase there are three parties

involved

The customer – who buys the goods

The retailer – who sells the goods

The finance company – who provides the finance

You make the initial agreement with the customer. Once the security

agreement has been signed you are likely to assign the agreement

(including your security interest in the goods) to the finance company. The

customer makes payments to the finance company. Whether the security

interest will revert back to you will depend on the terms and conditions of

your agreement with the finance company.

The normal tripartite hire purchase process between the dealer, customer and the finance company is as follows:

When the business connection between the finance company and

the dealer is first established a master agreement may be drawn up

regulating the conditions upon which the finance company is

prepared to consider the hire purchase transactions submitted by

the dealer.

After the customer has selected the goods he desires to acquire on

hire purchase, the dealer arranges for him to complete the

schedule to a form of hire purchase agreement. The larger finance

companies have their own standard forms of printed agreement.

In the schedule to the hire purchase agreement the dealer will

insert the hirer’s name, address, occupation, and certain other

25

Page 26: Asset based financing

details indicating his financial standing. It is also the dealer’

responsibility to insert details about the price and the installments

payable.

The intending hirer is often required to make a down payment as an

indication of the customer’s financial reliability. The deposit or down

payment is usually paid to the dealer at the time the proposal form

is completed and is normally retained by him as a payment on

account of the price to be paid to him by the finance company.

The deposit having duly paid the dealer sends the appropriate set

of documents to the finance company, requesting the company to

purchase the designated goods from him.

If the finance company decides to accept the transaction, the hire

purchase agreement is signed by one of its officers and a copy

dispatched to the hirer with instructions as to the mode of the

installments. At the same time as a copy is sent to the hirer, the

finance company notifies the dealer that the proposal has been

accepted and that it is in order for the dealer to deliver the goods, if

he has not already done so.

Upon notification of acceptance the dealer delivers the goods to the

hirer and obtains the hirer’s signature to a form of delivery receipt

constituting an acknowledgement by the hirer that he has received

the goods in proper condition.

The hirer makes payment of hire installment throughout the period

of hire

On completion of the hire term, the finance company issues to the

dealer a completion certificate whereupon the hirer becomes the

owner of the asset.

26

Page 27: Asset based financing

Key features of Hire Purchase:

Repayment schedules are flexible.

An Offer to Hire can be arranged with no deposit or an amount that suits

you.

Balloon payments at the end of the term can be arranged.

Esanda owns the goods until the final payment is made, at which point

you gain automatic ownership.

The interest component of the rental and depreciation on the equipment

are tax deductible, provided it is used to produce assessable income or

the expense is necessarily incurred in carrying on a business.

Hire Purchase Financing

Manufacturer sells asset to hires asset to

27

Manufacturer Hiree Hirer

Page 28: Asset based financing

What law applies to a hire purchase?

Hire purchase sales must comply with the Hire Purchase Act 1971. Where

a customer is paying more than the cash price of goods (e.g., with interest

added) the sale must also comply with the Credit Contracts Act 1981. 

Where the customer fails to pay their installments or puts the goods at

risk, the finance company or you as the seller must comply with the Credit (Repossession) Act 1997 if the goods are "consumer goods" (if the

goods are not "consumer goods" then the Personal Property Securities Act 1999 will apply). Sale of goods on hire purchase is also subject to the

Fair Trading Act 1986 and the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993.

Credit Contracts Act 1981

The Act covers loan and hire purchase contracts that have a value not

exceeding $250,000.  If the customer has several loans with the same

finance company the $250,000 rule will apply to the total of those loans. 

There must be a charge for providing the credit (e.g., the amount repaid

by the customer must exceed the cash price of the goods).

The Act sets out information that must be in the contract (the rules about

disclosure).

One must state:

The cash price of the goods

28

Page 29: Asset based financing

The amount of credit

The total cost of credit

The finance rate

Name and address of the creditor

The rate, frequency, and number of installments, when

payment is due, and who payment is made to

The right to cancel within three working days, and

All other terms of the contract.

Hire Purchase Act 1971

The Act sets out

The requirement to provide a hire purchase contract in

writing

The particular format for that contract

Rules for assigning a hire purchase

Rules for early settlement of the contract

Rules for variations to the contract.

29

Page 30: Asset based financing

Hire Purchase vs. Lease Financing

Both hire purchase and lease financing are a form of secured loan. Both displace

the debt capacity of the firm since they involve fixed payments. However they

differ in terms of the ownership of the asset. The hirer becomes the owner of the

assets as soon as he pays the last installment. In case of lease, the asset reverts

back to the lessor at the end of lease period. In practice the lessee may be able

to keep the asset after the expiry of the primary lease period for nominal lease

rentals.

The following are the differences between hire purchase and lease

financing:

Hire purchase Lease financing

1. Depreciation- Hirer is entitled to

claim depreciation.

1. Depreciation- lessee is not entitled

to claim depreciation.

2. Payments- hirer can charge only

interest portion of hire purchase

payments as expenses for tax

2. Payments- lessee can charge the

entire lease payments as expenses for

tax computation.

30

Page 31: Asset based financing

computation.

3. Salvage value- Once the hirer has

paid all installments; he becomes the

owner of the asset and can claim its

salvage value.

3. Salvage value- Lessee does not

become the owner of the asset.

Therefore he has no claim over the

asset’s salvage value.

Principle types of hire purchase

1. Consumer installment creditThe ground for distinction here is whether the goods are producer goods or

consumer goods. Finance provided to consumers for acquisition of consumer

durables is called installment credit. Installment credit for consumers is usually

extended in one of the following forms:

(a) Personal loan: this is made directly by the lending a dealer may introduce

company through the consumer. The loan may be unsecured or secured. E.g. by

a mortgage on the borrower’s property.

(b) Hire purchase or conditional sale: here funds are advanced for the

acquisition of particular goods, which the customer take under a hire-purchase or

conditional sale agreement, acquiring title on completion of payment. Where title

is reserved in this way the agreement usually used is a hire purchase agreement,

though some companies use conditional sale agreements. Retail hire purchase

agreements take three different forms namely

Direct collection- the dealer sells the goods to the finance house, which

lets them out on hire purchase to the customer. This is the most common

31

Page 32: Asset based financing

form of installment financing and is known in the trade as ‘direct collection’

because the installments are collected under a hire-purchase agreement

concluded direct between the finance house and the hirer, as opposed to

an agreement between the dealer and the hirer which is later discounted

under block-discounting agreement. Usually the finance house collects the

installments itself from the hirer, and the dealer drops out of the

transaction. Such transactions are called ‘non-recourse’ for the dealer.

Agency collection: this is a variant of direct collection. As before the

dealer sells goods to the finance company but in this case signs the

agreement himself as undisclosed agent for the finance company and as

such agent collects installments on behalf of the company, usually in

return for appropriate commission. Because the agreements are in

practice handled in blocks, this form of hire purchase is also misleadingly

referred to as agency block discounting, though it is not a form of block

discounting at all since there is no assignment of the agreement by the

dealer to the finance company and the dealer is acting merely as an

agent.

Block discounting: in this case the dealer enters into the hire purchase

agreement direct with the customer and later discounts it to the finance

company. Agreements are usually discounted in blocks at a time; hence it

is called block discounting. Once the agreement is discounted the finance

company becomes entitled to receive rentals from the hirer concerned but

quite commonly, in order not to disturb the business relationship existing

between the dealer and his customer, the dealer is made responsible for

collecting the installments and remitting these to the finance company.

(c) Credit sale: here the title passes to the customer from the outset. Again the

agreement may be with the finance house from the beginning or it may be

32

Page 33: Asset based financing

entered into between the dealer and customer direct and later assigned by the

dealer to the finance house.

(d) Rental: the renting of domestic goods is fast developing as a form of

installment credit. It is increasingly the practice and to a very larger extent in the

U.S., of finance houses to enter direct into rental agreements relating to domestic

goods.

DOCCUMENTS IN HIRE PURCHASE

All the parties must sign a hire purchase agreement and the agreement, among

other things, must specify the date when the hiring commences, the number of

installments, the amount of each installment, the time for the payment of each

installment, the description of the goods and where the goods are kept. Note that

the agreement must be in writing. An oral agreement is not a valid hire purchase

agreement.

Benefits of Hire Purchase

Retention of cash flow

Regular Payments

Existing credit lines preserved

Cost of acquisition spread overtime

Repayment schedules can be structured to suit your cash flow.

You can obtain the use of goods for minimal cash outlay, so working capital is not significantly affected.

You may be able to make use of the taxation benefits of hiring.

33

Page 34: Asset based financing

The Hire Purchase Agreement

When you buy goods on hire purchase, you and the seller sign a written

agreement.

How many agreements will be made

How often to pay

The amount to pay

When to pay

Where to pay

The name and address of the seller

Other information in the hire purchase agreement

What happens if payment is not made as agreed

The right to repossess goods if one fails to make payments on time

34

Page 35: Asset based financing

One’s obligation to keep the goods safe and in good order

How to return the goods if one cannot pay.

This information may be in the fine print on the back of the agreement. If any of

this information is missing from the agreement one may not be liable for some of

the cost of credit. The agreement cannot be enforced until the required

information has been supplied.

Termination of a hire purchase agreement.

Every hire purchase agreement must by definition confer on the hirer a power of

termination, if the absence of such power would commit the hirer to paying either

the whole price or all but a nominal sum. Omission of any provision entitling the

hirer to terminate will result in the agreement being characterized as a conditional

sale agreement and not a hire purchase agreement. A hire purchase agreement

may terminate in the following ways:

Under the agreement itself

By performance

By subsequent agreement

35

Page 36: Asset based financing

By notice at common law independent of agreement

By acceptance by one party of the other party’s repudiation

By release

By waiver

By merger

By frustration

Under the hire purchase agreement

In the first case it is usual for hire purchase agreement to stipulate the

circumstances in which the agreement should be terminated. The most common

causes of termination by virtue of the agreement are the return of the goods by

the hirer, notice of termination by the owner, notice of termination by the hirer,

breach by the hirer.

In the second case a hire purchase agreement usually comes to an end by

performance a soon as an option to purchase has been exercised. This is not

necessarily conterminous with the end of hiring, since the agreement may

provide that the option to purchase shall be exercised by payment of a further

nominal sum after the expiration of the period of hire.

Thirdly, the parties may at any time make a fresh agreement terminating the

contract concluded between them, provided that such contract has not already

come to an end. The new agreement may simply release both parties from their

36

Page 37: Asset based financing

obligations under the original agreement without doing anything further or it may

substitute new obligations for those released.

Fourthly, there are two cases where even at common law the hire purchase

agreement can be determined by notice given by either party. The first is where

one party has repudiated his obligations under the agreement to an end by

notifying the other party that the unlawful repudiation has been accepted. The

second case is where the hiring I periodic one, that is for an indefinite term

running month to month or year to year, the hirer having an option to purchase

the goods by making a payment which, when added to the total rent paid,

amounts to the stated price.

In the fifth case, where a party to the agreement renounces his future

obligations or commits a breach of the agreement such as to indicate an intention

no longer to be bound by its provisions and the other party accepts the

renunciation or breach discharging the contract. However where the hirer does

not renounce the agreement. But is merely guilty of failure of performance, the

owner will not be entitled to treat the agreement as repudiated unless the hirer’s

default goes to the root of the contract.

The sixth case is one where a hire purchase agreement has been completely

performed by one party but there are obligations remaining unfulfilled by the

other, the former agrees to release the latter from the outstanding obligations,

and thereupon if the release be legally operative, the agreement will come to an

end. A release being a unilateral discharge by one party shall be legally operative

only if it is either given by a written deed or is supported by consideration, failing

which the release will be inoperative for want of consideration.

Seventhly, waiver may also determine a hire purchase agreement. A waiver is

an intentional relinquishment of a known right. Waiver is a distinct release, as in

the latter there has to be release under the seal or for a consideration. If a party

37

Page 38: Asset based financing

grants a release that is not under the seal or for a consideration, the party shall

be estopped from denying the efficacy of the release.

Eighth is the case of merger. Where the obligations of a party to a contract

become embodied in a security of a higher order, then the original contract is

merged by operation of law into the higher security and is extinguished in

absence of a contrary intention of the parties. In a hire purchase agreement,

where an agreement not under the seal is followed by a deed under seal

between the same parties relating to the same goods, then unless a contrary

intention on the part of the parties is established the later document will be

deemed to have extinguished and replaced the earlier.

Ninth, where complete or substantial performance of the agreement becomes

impossible by reason of some act or event occurring subsequent to the formation

of the agreement, the supervening impossibility will in certain circumstances

automatically determine the agreement and discharge the parties from further

liability thereunder.

Lastly the hire purchase act, 1972 also contains specific instances where the

owner or the hirer may terminate the agreement.

38

Page 39: Asset based financing

Who can get HP?

Any person can choose to buy on hire purchase. But some retailers will not enter

into a hire purchase deals where the buyer's credit history shows to the retailer

that they are a poor credit risk.  Buyers who present a risk to the finance

company may require a co-borrower or a guarantor before credit approval is

given. Younger borrowers (those over 16) may be asked to provide a guarantor

either because they have no credit history or have only just started working –

making it difficult for the retailer to assess the credit risk.

Retailers and finance companies must comply with the Human Rights Act. This

means that they cannot deny credit only on the basis of gender, marital status,

race, color, religious or ethical belief, national or ethnic origins, disability, political

opinion, employment status, family status, sexual orientation, or age.

Finance companies

39

Page 40: Asset based financing

Shops often have an arrangement with a finance company to provide the hire

purchase finance. One makes the payments to the finance company, not to the

shop. The name of the finance company will be on the hire purchase agreement.

In most cases one pays more than the price on the price tag. Hire purchase

includes interest and other administrative costs.

E.g. A shop offers fridges for $800 cash or "credit over 24 months". One pays a

deposit at the shop, signs and agreement and the fridge is delivered home. One

pays the rest of the money in monthly installments to a finance company named

in the agreement. One pays back more than $1000 because interest and other

costs are added to the cash price.

Insurance and hire purchase

Insurance against theft, loss or damage: Law does not require this insurance

but the seller can insist the goods are insured for theft, loss or damage. If one

has household insurance one may not wish to buy separate insurance for the

goods. When one goes shopping for goods on hire purchase, one must take

proof of having up-to-date insurance. If one has household insurance seek

advice if the seller insists one must have additional and separate insurance for

the goods on hire purchase. This may be considered and oppressive’ condition.

One may agree to separate insurance cover for the goods. The seller may then

decide which company one must insure the goods with. The cost of insurance

must be at reasonable market rates. If one doesn’t have insurance and the goods

are stolen, lost or damaged, one may have to keep on paying for the goods.

Repayment or Consumer Protection Insurance

40

Page 41: Asset based financing

Consumer protection insurance (CPI) offers to make the payments for a set time

if one loses your income through illness, accident or redundancy. This insurance

is also called payment protection insurance or repayment insurance. Law does

not require this insurance but some shops make it a requirement for taking out

hire purchase with them.

Cancellation of the HP agreement

If the goods are not taken home one may cancel the credit part of the

agreement. The seller must be told within three working days that one wants to

cancel the credit and one must pay the cash price of the goods within 15 working

days of the date of cancellation. One must cancel the credit in writing.

If one has taken the goods home but not received a copy of the agreement one

can cancel the credit at any time. This also applies if the agreement does not

contain all the information it should. One then has 15 working days to pay the

cash price of the goods. One can ask the shop to take the goods back

In case of an interest-free deal with no cost of credit then one does not have a

three-day right to cancel unless the right is included in your agreement.

In case of a hire purchase deal with a door-to-door seller one has extra

cancellation rights.

If the seller breaks the terms of the agreement one can cancel the agreement.

For example, if the seller does not deliver the goods or agrees to insure the

goods but does not do so.

Faulty goods on HP

If goods are faulty, break down or are not what one ordered you have the rights

under the Consumer Guarantees Act.

41

Page 42: Asset based financing

One can expect to be given correct information about the goods and the hire

purchase agreement. The Fair Trading Act says the seller must not mislead the

buyer or give false information.

Early repayment If the cash price of the goods is under $15,000 one can pay

the hire purchase off early at any time. One will be entitled to a rebate. This is a

reduction in the amount that one has agreed to pay. There are rebates for the

finance charges (interest and booking fees), insurance charges and maintenance

service contracts.

Project financing

There is a growing realization in many developing countries of the limitations of

governments in managing and financing economic activities, particularly large

infrastructure projects. Provision of infrastructure facilities, traditionally in the

government domain is now being offered for private sector investments and

management. This trend has been reinforced by the resource crunch faced by

many governments. Large investments, long gestation periods and very specific

domestic markets usually characterize infrastructure projects.

In evaluating these projects, an important question is the appropriate rate of

return on the equity investment. Tolls and tariffs are set as to recover operating

costs and to provide a return to capital-interest and repayment of debt and return

on equity. Therefore the decision on the appropriate return to equity has

42

Page 43: Asset based financing

implications for the overall viability and acceptability of the project. While most

elements of costs can be determined with reference to market prices, return to

equity cannot be determined in the same way since most of the equity is

provided by the sponsor or by a small number of investors. This leaves room for

disagreement on the appropriate return to equity. In the case of the Indian power

projects, this has been one of the contentious issues.

Return to equity will depend upon the risk of cash flows fro the project and

the financial structure i.e. the relative proportion of debt and equity. Since

infrastructure projects employ a number of risk mitigation contracts, it is important

have knowledge about the agreements.

What is project financing?In project financing, the project, its assets, contracts, inherent economies and

cash flows are separated from their promoters or sponsors in order to permit

credit appraisal and loan to the project, independent of the sponsors. The assets

of the specific project serve as a collateral for the loan, and all loan payments are

made out of the cash flows of the project. In this sense, the loan is said to be of

non-recourse or limited recourse to the sponsor. Thus project financing may be

defined as that scheme of financing of a particular economic unit in which a

lender is satisfied in looking at the cash flows and the earnings of that economic

unit as a source of funds, from which a loan can be repaid, and to the assets of

the economic unit as a collateral for the loan. In the past, project financing was

mostly used in oil exploration and other mineral extraction through joint ventures

with foreign firms. The most received use of project financing can be found in

infrastructure projects, particularly in power and telecommunications projects.

Project financing is made possible by combining undertakings and various

kinds of guarantees by parties who are interested in a project. It is built in such a

way that no one party alone has to assume the full credit responsibility of the

project. When all the undertakings are combined and reviewed together, it results

in an equivalent of the satisfactory credit risk for the lenders. It is often suggested

43

Page 44: Asset based financing

that project financing enables a parent company to obtain inexpensive loans

without having to bear all risks of the project. But in practice the parent company

is affected by the actual plight of the project, and the interests on the project loan

depends on the parents stake in the project.

The traditional form of financing is the corporate financing or the

balance sheet financing. In this case although financing is apparently for a

project, the lender looks at the cash flows and assets of the whole company in

order to service the debt and provide security.

Characteristics of Project Financing:

A separate project entity is created that receives loans from lenders and

equity from sponsors.

The component of debt is very high in Project Financing. Thus the project

financing is a highly leveraged financing.

The Project funding and all its other cash flows are separated from the

parent company’s balance sheet.

Debt services and repayments entirely depend on the project’s cash flows.

Project assets are used as collateral for loan repayments.

44

Page 45: Asset based financing

Project financers risks are not entirely covered by the sponsor’s

guarantees.\

Third parties like suppliers, customers, government, and sponsors commit

to share the risk of the project.

Project financing is most appropriate for those projects that require larger amount

of capital expenditure and involve high risk. It is used by companies to reduce

their own risk by allocating the risk to a number of parties. It allows sponsors to:

Financing large projects than the company’s credit and financial capability

would permit.

Insulate the company’s balance sheet from the impact of the project.

Use high degree of leverage to benefit the equity owners.

Advantages of project financing

Non-recourse: The typical project financing involves a loan to enable

the sponsor to construct a project where the loan is completely "non-

recourse" to the sponsor, i.e., the sponsor has no obligation to make

payments on the project loan if revenues generated by the project are

insufficient to cover the principal and interest payments on the loan. In

order to minimize the risks associated with a non-recourse loan, a lender

typically will require indirect credit supports in the form of guarantees,

warranties and other covenants from the sponsor, its affiliates and other

third parties involved with the project.

Maximize Leverage. In a project financing, the sponsor typically seeks

to finance the costs of development and construction of the project on a

45

Page 46: Asset based financing

highly leveraged basis. Frequently, such costs are financed using 80 to

100 percent debt. High leverage in a non-recourse project financing

permits a sponsor to put less in funds at risk, permits a sponsor to finance

the project without diluting its equity investment in the project and, in

certain circumstances, also may permit reductions in the cost of capital by

substituting lower-cost, tax-deductible interest for higher-cost, taxable

returns on equity.

Off-Balance-Sheet Treatment. Depending upon the structure of a

project financing, the project sponsor may not be required to report any of

the project debt on its balance sheet because such debt is non-recourse

or of limited recourse to the sponsor. Off-balance-sheet treatment can

have the added practical benefit of helping the sponsor comply with

covenants and restrictions relating to borrowing funds contained in other

indentures and credit agreements to which the sponsor is a party.

Maximize Tax Benefits. Project financings should be structured to

maximize tax benefits and to assure that all available tax benefits are used

by the sponsor or transferred, to the extent permissible, to another party

through a partnership, lease or other vehicle.

Disadvantages of project financing

Project financings are extremely complex. It may take a much longer

period of time to structure, negotiate and document a project financing

than a traditional financing,

46

Page 47: Asset based financing

The legal fees and related costs associated with a project financing can be

very high.

The risks assumed by lenders may be greater in a non-recourse project

financing than in a more traditional financing.

The cost of capital may be greater than with a traditional finance

Risks involved in Project financing

From the perspective of potential investors the main risks relate to project

completion, market, foreign currency and supply of inputs. The objective is to

allocate these risks to those parties who are in the best position to control

particular risk factors. This reduces the ‘moral hazard’ problem and minimizes the

cost of bearing risks.

Project completion risk:This is the major risk factor in most infrastructure projects. It is usually covered

by a fixed price, firm date, and turnkey construction project with liquidated

damages for delay supported by performance bonds. The contract specifies

performance parameters and warranty periods for defects. Lenders require

sponsors of the project company to provide a guarantee to fund cost overruns. In

addition a standby credit facility may also be employed.

47

Page 48: Asset based financing

Market risk:Having long-term quantity and price agreements covers this risk. In the case of

power projects where the electricity is likely to be sold to a government controlled

distribution company, this is achieved through a ‘take or pay’ power purchase

agreement (PPA). Under this contract, certain payments have to be made

irrespective of the actual off-take as long as the company makes available the

capacity. The tariff is determined on a cost plus basis using standard costs. For

power projects in India, the government has evolved a system of two part tariffs.

The first part ensures recovery of fixed costs based on performance at normative

parameters. Fixed costs include depreciation, operating and maintenance

expenses, tax on income, interest on loans, and working capital and a return on

equity. This part of the tariff is paid irrespective of the amount of power actually

taken. The second part covers variable expenses based on the units of electricity

actually supplied. Variable costs are the costs of primary and secondary fuel

based on set norms for fuel consumption. Apart from the PPA, payments may be

made to a trustee, usually an international bank, as additional security, in an

escrow account that then directly makes payments to creditors and suppliers.

These arrangements effectively transfer the market risk to the power

purchaser. In more sophisticated and privatized regulatory environments,

independent power producers may take more market risk. For example in a

Chilean power project, the company is developing the project without having a

single purchaser PPA. Instead it has signed several long-term contracts with

different private purchasers.

In the case of transport projects, tolls have to be collected from the public

and not from a government agency. This can give rise to problems while

enforcing toll agreements. Competition from alternative roads or transit systems

can also affect the traffic flow. Therefore unlike power projects that have power

purchase agreements, in transport projects, lenders cannot rely on fixed revenue

48

Page 49: Asset based financing

over the life of the project. Hence the project continues to carry market risk. This

is sought to be mitigated by several other agreements. If traffic flows are below

expectations, the project has recourse to such measures as an adjustment in the

revenue sharing proportion; an increase in tolls on the system, and an extension

of the concession periods. In many cases, there are automatic escalation clauses

in the toll agreement to account for inflation.

Foreign exchange risk:Foreign exchange risks are perhaps the single largest concern of foreign

financiers investing in developing countries. In the case of infrastructure projects,

the risk is greater since most of these projects, with the exception of some

telecommunication and port projects, generate local currency revenues. The risk

is at two levels:

Macro economic convertibility: Whether the project will have access to

foreign exchange to cover debt service and equity payments.

Tariff adjustment for currency depreciation: Whether the foreign

exchange equivalent of the project’s local revenues will be adequate to

service foreign debts and equity.

The risk of macro economic convertibility will generally require a few government

guarantees. In many projects, there is provision for tariff escalation to account for

49

Page 50: Asset based financing

currency depreciation and project returns to investors in foreign currency terms.

For Indian power projects, the return on foreign equity included in the tariff can

be provided in the respective foreign currency.

First Step in a Project Financing:

(A) The Feasibility Study

Generally. As one of the first steps in a project financing the sponsor or a

technical consultant hired by the sponsor will prepare a feasibility study showing

the financial viability of the project. Frequently, a prospective lender will hire its

own independent consultants to prepare an independent feasibility study before

the lender will commit to lend funds for the project.

Contents. The feasibility study should analyze every technical, financial and

other aspect of the project, including the time-frame for completion of the various

phases of the project development, and should clearly set forth all of the financial

50

Page 51: Asset based financing

and other assumptions upon which the conclusions of the study are based,

Among the more important items contained in a feasibility study are:

Description of project.

Description of sponsor(s).

Sponsors' Agreements.

Project site.

Governmental arrangements.

Source of funds.

Off take Agreements.

Construction Contract.

Management of project.

Capital costs.

Working capital.

Equity sourcing.

Debt sourcing.

Financial projections.

Market study.

Assumptions

Feedstock agreements.

(B) The Project Company.

1. Legal Form. Sponsors of projects adopt many different legal forms for the

ownership of the project. The specific form adopted for any particular project will

depend upon many factors, including:

The amount of equity required for the project

The concern with management of the project

The availability of tax benefits associated with the project

51

Page 52: Asset based financing

The need to allocate tax benefits in a specific manner among the project

company investors.

The three basic forms for ownership of a project are:

Corporations. This is the simplest form for ownership of a project. A special

purpose corporation may be formed under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the

project is located, or it may be formed in some other jurisdiction and be qualified

to do business in the jurisdiction of the project.

General Partnerships. The sponsors may form a general partnership. In most

jurisdictions, a partnership is recognized as a separate legal entity and can own,

operate and enter into financing arrangements for a project in its own name. A

partnership is not a separate taxable entity, and although a partnership is

required to file tax returns for reporting purposes, items of income, gain, losses,

deductions and credits are allocated among the partners, which include their

allocated share in computing their own individual taxes. Consequently, a

partnership frequently will be used when the tax benefits associated with the

project are significant. Because the general partners of a partnership are

severally liable for all of the debts and liabilities of the partnership, a sponsor

frequently will form a wholly owned, single-purpose subsidiary to act as its

general partner in a partnership.

Limited Partnerships. A limited partnership has similar characteristics to a

general partnership except that the limited partners have limited control over the

business of the partnership and are liable only for the debts and liabilities of the

partnership to the extent of their capital contributions in the partnership. A limited

partnership may be useful for a project financing when the sponsors do not have

substantial capital and the project requires large amounts of outside equity.

52

Page 53: Asset based financing

Limited Liability Companies. They are a cross between a corporation and a

limited partnership.

2. Project Company Agreements. Depending on the form of project

company chosen for a particular project financing, the sponsors and other equity

investors will enter into a stockholder agreement, general or limited partnership

agreement or other agreement that sets forth the terms under which they will

develop, own and operate the project. At a minimum, such an agreement should

cover the following matters:

Ownership interests.

Capitalization and capital calls.

Allocation of profits and losses.

Distributions.

Accounting.

Governing body and voting.

Day-to-day management.

Budgets.

Transfer of ownership interests.

Admission of new participants.

Default.

Termination and dissolution.

Project financing participants and agreements

53

Page 54: Asset based financing

Sponsor/Developer. The sponsor(s) or developer(s) of a project

financing is the party that organizes all of the other parties and typically

controls, and makes an equity investment in, the company or other entity

that owns the project. If there is more than one sponsor, the sponsors

typically will form a corporation or enter into a partnership or other

arrangement pursuant to which the sponsors will form a "project company"

to own the project and establish their respective rights and responsibilities

regarding the project

Additional Equity Investors. In addition to the sponsor(s), there

frequently are additional equity investors in the project company. These

additional investors may include one or more of the other project

participants.

Construction Contractor. The construction contractor enters into a

contract with the project company for the design, engineering and

construction of the project.

Operator. The project operator enters into a long-term agreement with

the project company for the day-to-day operation and maintenance of the

project.

Feedstock Supplier. The feedstock supplier(s) enters into a long-term

agreement with the project company for the supply of feedstock (i.e.,

energy, raw materials or other resources) to the project (e.g., for a power

plant, the feedstock supplier will supply fuel; for a paper mill, the feedstock

supplier will supply wood pulp).

54

Page 55: Asset based financing

Product Off taker. The product off taker(s) enters into a long-term

agreement with the project company for the purchase of all of the energy,

goods or other product produced at the project.

Lender. The lender in a project financing is a financial institution or

group of financial institutions that provide a loan to the project company to

develop and construct the project and that take a security interest in all of

the project assets

Principal Agreements in a Project Financing.

55

Page 56: Asset based financing

(A) Construction Contract. Some of the more important terms of the

construction contract are:

Project Description. The construction contract should set forth a detailed

description of all of the work necessary to complete the project.

Price. Most project financing construction contracts are fixed-price

contracts although some projects may be built on a cost-plus basis. If the

contract is not fixed-price, additional debt or equity contributions may be

necessary to complete the project, and the project agreements should

clearly indicate the party or parties responsible for such contributions.

Payment. Payments typically are made on a "milestone" or "completed

work" basis, with a retainage. This payment procedure provides an

incentive for the contractor to keep on schedule and useful monitoring

points for the owner and the lender.

Completion Date. The construction completion date, together with any

time extensions resulting from an event of force majeure, must be

consistent with the parties' obligations under the other project documents.

If construction is not finished by the completion date, the contractor

typically is required to pay liquidated damages to cover debt service for

each day until the project is completed. If construction is completed early,

the contractor frequently is entitled to an early completion bonus.

Performance Guarantees. The contractor typically will guarantee that the

project will be able to meet certain performance standards when

completed. Such standards must be set at levels to assure that the project

will generate sufficient revenues for debt service, operating costs and a

return on equity. Such guarantees are measured by performance tests

conducted by the contractor at the end of construction. If the project does

not meet the guaranteed levels of performance, the contractor typically is

required to make liquidated damages payments to the sponsor. If project

performance exceeds the guaranteed minimum levels, the contractor may

be entitled to bonus payments.

56

Page 57: Asset based financing

(B) Feedstock Supply Agreements. The project company will enter into

one or more feedstock supply agreements for the supply of raw materials, energy

or other resources over the life of the project. Frequently, feedstock supply

agreements are structured on a "put-or-pay" basis, which means that the supplier

must either supply the feedstock or pay the project company the difference in

costs incurred in obtaining the feedstock from another source. The price

provisions of feedstock supply agreements must assure that the cost of the

feedstock is fixed within an acceptable range and consistent with the financial

projections of the project.

(C) Product off take Agreements. In a project financing, the product off

take agreements represent the source of revenue for the project. Such

agreements must be structured in a manner to provide the project company with

sufficient revenue to pay its project debt obligations and all other costs of

operating, maintaining and owning the project. Frequently, off take agreements

are structured on a "take-or-pay" basis, which means that the off taker is

obligated to pay for product on a regular basis whether or not the off taker

actually takes the product unless the product is unavailable due to a default by

the project company. Like feedstock supply arrangements, off take agreements

frequently are on a fixed or scheduled price basis during the term of the project

debt financing.

(D) Operations and Maintenance Agreement. The project company

typically will enter into a long-term agreement for the day-to-day operation and

maintenance of the project facilities with a company having the technical and

financial expertise to operate the project in accordance with the cost and

production specifications for the project. The operator may be an independent

company, or it may be one of the sponsors. The operator typically will be paid a

fixed compensation and may be entitled to bonus payments for extraordinary

project performance and be required to pay liquidated damages for project

performance below specified levels.

57

Page 58: Asset based financing

(E) Management Agreement.

(F) Loan and Security Agreement. The borrower in a project financing

typically is the project company formed by the sponsor(s) to own the project. The

loan agreement will set forth the basic terms of the loan and will contain general

provisions relating to maturity, interest rate and fees. The typical project financing

loan agreement also will contain provisions such as these:

Disbursement Controls. These frequently take the form of conditions

precedent to each draw down, requiring the borrower to present invoices,

builders' certificates or other evidence as to the need for and use of the

funds.

Progress Reports. The lender may require periodic reports certified by an

independent consultant on the status of construction progress.

Covenants Not to Amend. The borrower will covenant not to amend or

waive any of its rights under the construction, feedstock, offtake,

operations and maintenance, or other principal agreements without the

consent of the lender.

Completion Covenants. These require the borrower to complete the

project in accordance with project plans and specifications and prohibit the

borrower from materially altering the project plans without the consent of

the lender.

Dividend Restrictions. These covenants place restrictions on the

payment of dividends or other distributions by the borrower until debt

service obligations are satisfied.

Debt and Guarantee Restrictions. The borrower may be prohibited from

incurring additional debt or from guaranteeing other obligations.

Financial Covenants. Such covenants require the maintenance of

working capital and liquidity ratios, debt service coverage ratios, debt

service reserves and other financial ratios to protect the credit of the

borrower.

58

Page 59: Asset based financing

Subordination. Lenders typically require other participants in the project

to enter into a subordination agreement under which certain payments to

such participants from the borrower under project agreements are

restricted (either absolutely or partially) and made subordinate to the

payment of debt service.

Security. Multiple forms of collateral typically will secure the project loan,

including:

1) Mortgage on the project facilities and real property.

2) Assignment of operating revenues.

3) Pledge of bank deposits.

4) Assignment of any letters of credit or performance or completion bonds

relating to the project under which borrower is the beneficiary.

5) Liens on the borrower's personal property.

6) Assignment of insurance proceeds.

7) Assignment of all project agreements.

8) Pledge of stock in Project Company or assignment of partnership interests.

9) Assignment of any patents, trademarks or other intellectual property owned

by the borrower.

(G) Site Lease Agreement. The project company typically enters into a

long-term lease for the life of the project relating to the real property on which the

project is to be located. Rental payments may be set in advance at a fixed rate or

may be tied to project performance.

59

Page 60: Asset based financing

Insurance

The general categories of insurance available in connection with project

financings are:

(A) Standard Insurance. The following types of insurance typically are

obtained for all project financings and cover the most common types of

losses that a project may suffer:

60

Page 61: Asset based financing

Property Damage, including transportation, fire and extended

casualty

Boiler and Machinery.

Comprehensive General Liability.

Worker's Compensation.

Automobile Liability and Physical Damage.

Umbrella or Excess Liability.

(B) Optional Insurance. The following types of insurance often are obtained

in connection with a project financing. Coverages such as these are more

expensive than standard insurance and require more tailoring to meet the

specific needs of the project.

Design Errors and Omissions.

System Performance (Efficiency).

Pollution Liability.

Cost Overrun/Delayed Opening

61

Page 62: Asset based financing

Performance Bonds.

Business Interruption.

Conclusion

Today asset based financing has formed an integral part of the Financing

scenario. This is because firms today can’t afford to buy the

equipments/machines outright. Not all firms today are that financially sound.

Today firms find it extremely difficult to obtain financial aid from the normal

sources. Firms that have the financial capacity prefer to hire/lease the equipment

as it releases the financial burden as well as provides tax benefit of depreciation.

Especially Project financing has come of age as most of the banks today are into

project financing. Earlier it was chartered accountants who indulged into project

financing but now it is more of bank involvement. But today the growth in Project

62

Page 63: Asset based financing

Finance is low where as lease and hire purchase are on a upward trend with

more and more companies like Bajaj, Hero Honda providing their products on

hire.

So in the changing economic and financial environment of India, asset

based financing has assumed an extremely important role.

63


Top Related