8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
1/21
A Life and Death Compromise: TheMandatory Death Penalty
in the Caribbean Court of Justice
A Proposed Work in Progress Presentation forNORTHEAST PEOPLE OF COLOR SCHOLARSHIP CONFERENCE
by
Jane E. CrossAssociate Professor of Law andDirector of Caribbean Law Programs,Nova Southeastern UniversityShepard Broad Law Center
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
2/21
Attorney General of Barbados v.
Joseph
Article will examine a Caribbean Court ofJustice (CCJ) decision on the MandatoryDeath Penalty
Case study of Boyce and Joseph illustratesthe dynamics of the mandatory death penaltyin the Caribbean and the jurisprudentialtrends in the region in three ways:
Background of Mandatory Death Penalty Constitutional Issues
Human Rights compromises in Caribbean law
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
3/21
Attorney General of Barbados v.
Joseph
Two challenges: The constitutionality of
The mandatory death penalty
Barbados Privy Council (BPC) actionsafter a petition to the Inter-AmericanCommission on Human Rights (IACHR).
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
4/21
Background of Death Penalty
in Commonwealth Barbados like almost all Commonwealth
Caribbean nations has a mandatory
death penalty. Conviction for murder = death sentence.
Death sentence can be commuted to
life sentence by Governor-General uponrecommendations of the Barbados PrivyCouncil.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
5/21
Death Penalty History
The mandatory death penalty has existed sincecolonization because it was retained at independencethrough a saving clause in the constitution.
Savings clause: sanctions laws existing at time ofindependence even if the law contravenes theconstitution
Barbados saved death penalty after independencein 1966 even though the UK had abolished the death
penalty in 1965 because Barbados had notincorporated that abolition into its laws.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
6/21
International Obligations of
Barbados
OAS (Organization of American States)member since 1967
Party to OAS Charter and later theAmerican Convention on Human Rights(ACHR) (since 1978)
Acceded to the International Covenanton Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in1973.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
7/21
Commonwealth Caribbean
ParadoxAs noted by Justice Nelson, Commonwealth Caribbean
Courts face a paradox in mandatory death penaltycases:
1. Judge must sentence convicted murderer to death.2. Constitution mandates a clemency hearing before
an execution.
3. Executives have entered into treaties that permit
challenges in international human rights bodies todeath sentence after an exhaustion of domesticappeals.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
8/21
Basic Thesis
In resolving this paradox, the CCJ is once againengaging in a human rights compromise.
1.While the Caribbean seeks to observe humanrights, it remains anchored to the past.
2.As long as the mandatory death penalty isconstitutional, post-conviction procedure
remains the principal human rights safeguard.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
9/21
Procedural History of Joseph -
Boyce CaseJoseph-Boyce case has gone through the
Barbados appellate process twice.
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council(2004)
Caribbean Court of Justice (2006)
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
10/21
Timetable of Joseph - Boyce
Case (Phase I) April 10, 1999: Marquelle Hippolyte murdered byJeffrey Joseph and Lennox Ricardo Boyce and twoothers.
February 2, 2001: Joseph and Boyce were foundguilty of murder and mandatory sentence of death byhanging was imposed on both.
March 27, 2002: Appeal to the Court of Appeal ofBarbados was dismissed.
June 24, 2002: The Barbados Privy Council (BPC)met and advised against commutation of the deathsentences.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
11/21
Timetable of Joseph - Boyce
Case (Phase I contd) June 26, 2002: Death Warrants were read to themen. An order was obtained from the High Court ofBarbados staying the execution pending an appeal tothe Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC).
July 7, 2004: JCPC upheld (by a five to four majority)the mandatory death penalty in Barbados and theappeals of Joseph and Boyce were dismissed.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
12/21
Timetable of Joseph - Boyce
Case (Phase II) September 3, 2004: Joseph and Boyce filed
application before the Inter-AmericanCommission on Human Rights (theCommission) for a declaration that of a
violation of their rights under the AmericanConvention on Human Rights (ACHR).
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
13/21
Timetable of Joseph - Boyce
Case (Phase II contd) September 13, 2004: BPC meet to
consider ramifications of JCPC decision
and advised the Governor-General thatthe death sentences should be carriedout.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
14/21
Timetable of Joseph - BoyceCase (Phase II contd)
September 15, 2004: Death warrants
were read to Joseph and Boyce for an
execution scheduled on September 21,2004.
September 16, 2004: Motion filed
before High Court seeking commutationof death sentence.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
15/21
Timetable of Joseph - BoyceCase (Phase II contd)
September 17, 2004: The Inter-American
Court issued provisional measures requiringBarbados to preserve the lives of the two men
pending the outcome of their petition to theCommission.
December 22, 2004: The High Courtdismissed the motion.
The case then went to the Barbados Court ofAppeals which ordered the death sentencescommuted and substituted with lifeimprisonment.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
16/21
Timetable of Joseph - Boyce
Case (Phase II in CCJ) June 20-21, 2006: This case was heard
before the Caribbean Court of Justice.
November 8, 2006: The CaribbeanCourt of Justice delivered its opinionwhich ultimately dismissed the
Governments Appeal of thecommutation of the death sentences.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
17/21
CCJ Case
The two issues before the CCJ were
1. whether the BPCs decision was
reviewable under the BarbadosConstitution and
2. whether the BPCs failure to await theoutcome of the IACHR petition violated
Josephs and Boyces right toprotection under the law.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
18/21
Pratt and MorganCaveat
Regardless of the resolution of these issues theCCJ agreed that the 1994 JCPC precedent ofPratt and Morganwould prohibit the
execution of Joseph and Boyce:
Prohibition of execution after five years hadelapsed.
In this case five years had elapsed onFebruary 2, 2006.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
19/21
CCJ Holdings
The CCJ held that
1. the BPCs exercise of the prerogative
of mercy is reviewable.2. the failure of the BPC to await the
outcome of the petition to the IACHR
was a contravention of the right to theprotection of the law.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
20/21
Key Points of Justice De la Bastide andSaunders Joint Opinion
1. The power to confirm or commute a death sentence,particularly a mandatory one, is far too important to permitthose in whom it is vested freedom to exercise that powerwithout the possibility of judicial review even if they commit
breaches of the basic rules of procedural fairness.2. [T]he respondents had a legitimate expectation that they
would be allowed a reasonable time within which to completethe process which they initiated by petitioning to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and make the report
of that body available to the BPC in support of their case forcommutation. For the state to attempt to execute therespondents without giving them that opportunity was a denialof their right to the protection of law for which the court had aninherent remedy.
8/2/2019 Barbados Death Penalty
21/21
Use of Procedural Rules to LimitDeath Penalty Use
Explore the rationale for the CCJs decision,especially the distinction between procedureand substance;
Examine whether or not the Joseph case haslaid the groundwork for the ultimate abolitionof the mandatory death penalty in allCommonwealth Caribbean nations; and
Discuss whether this compromise to preservethe mandatory death penalty providesadequate human rights protections.