BMJ
Birmingham Pathological Society, March 2, 1844Author(s): John SimonsSource: Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal (1844-1852), Vol. 8, No. 7 (May 15, 1844), pp.96-99Published by: BMJStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25497881 .
Accessed: 12/06/2014 19:58
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
BMJ is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Provincial Medical and SurgicalJournal (1844-1852).
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 194.29.185.216 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:58:15 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
96 PUERPERAL CONVULSIONS.
the necessary amount of information and know
ledge, the Government would not have been
justified il blindly adopting his views. We do
not indeed think it necessary that Sir James
Graham should have taken into his councils every
individual physician, surgeon, or general practi tioner, who may deem himself qualified and com
petent to give advice, but his ear ought at least to have been open to large bodies of the profession, and in seeking assistance and counsel from, or
submitting the whole or parts of his intended
measure to the consideration of chartered or other
wise recognized public bodies,there should have been no preference shown, no exclusiveness manifested.
We have been so far led away by these
preliminary considerations as to preclude us
from here entering on either of the two leading
points upon which the Society of Apothecaries think
it necessary to enlarge. Both of them are in
themselves of considerable importance, and the
observations made upon them in "The statement"
deserving of every attention, on account as well of the position of the body from which they emanate, as
the nature of the subjects to which they refer.
The comments to which they naturally give rise
must be reserved for another occasion.
TREATMENT OF PUERPERAL CONVULSIONS. Mr. DRUITT'S reply to Dr. ARNOLD.
TO THE EDITOR OF THE PROVINCTAL MEDICAL AND
SURGICAL JOURNAL.
SIR, Your correspondent, Dr. Arnold, brings against me
the double accusation of " much candour "
and " wrong
principles of treatment;" by which I suppose he means, that I not only do not know how to treat my patients, but am silly enough to tell of it. He is good enough
also to favour your readers with his ideas of the nature
and treatment of puerperal convulsions, which make me doubt seriously whether he is himself acquainted with the disease which he writes about.
My object was to show, that a remedy which is
commonly employed, and which it is certainly natural
to employ, may occasionally produce very serious
inconveniences; and I wished to point out another
remedy which would be a better promotor of secretion, and at the same time be free from the inconveniences
in question. I had no wish to produce the opinions of
authors as an apology for my treatment; nor, in fact, had I any occasion: it was correct, although unfortunate
in one respect. Dr. Arnold, if I understand him right, believes
puerperal convulsions, to depend on an abnormal state of
circulation in the brain, arising from sympathy with
the uterus; he believes it to be a disorder analogous to, or identical with epilepsy or hysteria; that it may also be caused by excessive hemorrhage; and that it,
does not depend on an excess of blood in the whole
system; consequently he would use only local bleeding, mild aperients, cold affusion, and other mild remedies.
I will leave it to your readers to judge whether this
is a fair description of the disease in question, of
which more than one-fourth of the whole number of
cases are fatal. That convulsions may occur during parturition, which are hysterical or anaemic in their
character, and which yield to mild remedies, I readily admit; but the real puerperal convulsions are widely different. They occur at a time when the blood
making powers of the system are exerted to the utmost; when the vessels are full, and the secretions scanty;. and there is no disorder in which blood-letting is so
well borne, or followed by such marked benefit. We
may throw aside all fine spun stories about sympathy. Let us look merely at the turgid countenance, and
comatose aspect, and feel the hard labouring pulse, and
there will be no doubt of the propriety of bleeding. To set at rest, however, the question of the utility
of bleeding in my case, I will merely observe that the
patient is now in the seventh month of her second
pregnancy; and throughout the term there has been a
constant tendency to cerebral congestion and phethora, She is obliged to restrict herself almost entirely to a
fish or vegetable diet, and to abstain from alcoholic
stimulants in any shape. If she transgresses, she is
immediately troubled with giddiness, and bleeding from
the nose; and on one occasion lost a considerable
quantity of blood from the rectum, with relief. This
will speak volumes to any practical man.
I will not notice any other of the points of my treat
ment, which your correspondent thinks he could have
improved upon. I am merely desirous that his erro
neous sentiments, on a very important disease, should
not pass without a hasty comment. I can assure himn
that in any controversy, I should be delighted to have
him for an opponent. I am, Sir, your obedient servant,
ROBERT DRUITT. 6, Bruton Street, London,
April 29, 1844.
BIRMINGHAM PATHOLOGICAL SOCIETY,
March 2, 1844.
JOHN SIMONS, Esq., in the Chair.
Mr. Elkington exhibited a specimen of Scirrhus of
the Uterus, which had been complicated during life
with Ovarian Dropsy.
CASE. Mrs. Low, aged 41, a strong active woman, mother
of one child-first felt unwell in January, 1843; she
had dyspepsia and pain in her back, which were relieved
by tonics, &c. In April she had an inflammatory
attack, affecting, she says, the lower part of the belly,
accompanied by fever, pain about the pubic region, constipation, and pain in making water. She was
relieved by leeches and antiphlogistic measures; she
then went into the country and remained there
for some weeks. She consulted me on her return in
September. I learnt that whilst she was in the country
This content downloaded from 194.29.185.216 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:58:15 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
BIRMINGHAM PATHOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 97
she had had swelling of the right leg, which, from her
description, was probably phlegmasia dolens; obstinate constipation, pains about the pelvis, and a constant
watery discharge from the rectum. She now com
plains of great difficulty in regulating her bowels, and
cannot keep them open without aperients; she says when the motions are figured, they are very small, not thicker than the little finger. She has a frequent
watery discharge from the rectum, which escapes generally when she lies down, and to the amount per
haps of a table-spoonful or two, each time. Whilst she was in the country she states that she was obliged to get up in the night every ten or fifteen minutes to
evacuate the bowels, and that nothing passed but a
small quantity of clear water. On examination extern ally a small circumscribed tumour in the left iliac fossa, about the size of a small orange, imnmoveable and semi
elastic was detected. On examination per vaginam, I found a firm inelastic tumour, occupying the greater part of the cavity of the pelvis; it was low down, hard and
fixed, and seemed to consist of enlargement of the
uterus. It appeared to occupy anteriorly more the
left side of the pelvis, and the left side of the vagina was puckered, as if adhesions were formed. On exami
nation per rectum, the tumour was found posteriorly
larger on the right side, and encroaching very much on
the cavity of the rectum, greatly interfering with the
passage of the faeces. She had very little discharge from the vagina, and that merely an increase of the
natural secretion; there was slight tenderness and
swelling of the lips of the os uteri. She had lost flesh, and was gradually getting thinner She suffered from
a sensation of weight and heaviness in the pelvis, but
not much from pain. The most distressing feature of
the case was obstinate constipation. The legs became
edematous; she gradually got thinner and weaker, became dropsical, increasing to a great size in the belly.
She died Feb. 2, 1844. The treatment was palliative.
Post-mortem, Feb. 3rd. We could only get permission to examine the abdomen. About two gallons of serum
were drawn off from the cavity of the peritoneum. On
opening the abdomen we found the peritoneum lining the parietes covered with numerous small tumours,
varying from the size of a pea to that of a large marble; the omentum was like a bunch of large grapes; the under surface of the liver was studded with them, and the small intestines had also a sprinkling of them.
There were bands of lymph tying the intestines to the
parietes; there was also lymph deposited on the liver
and spleen. With some difficulty we removed the con
tents of the pelvis. On examination we found the
uterus enlarged and very hard, having the true scir
rhous character, the os patulous; the lips swollen, and
upon the anterior lip three small ulcerations, the
largest about the size of a split pea, and superficial. There is a scirrhous growth from each side of the body,
commencing at the upper part of the cervix, and which terminates in a cyst the size of a walnut, filled with
serum; the right Fallopian tube is enlarged, hardened, and firmly united with and forming part of the uterine
tumour; the left Fallopian tube is united with the
surrounding parts; posteriorly, the rectum is adhering to the lower part and middle of the uterus, from which it cannot be easily separated; behind the fundus there
is a portion of the ileum adhering; on the fore part the bladder adhered firmly to the uterus throughout,
and was with difficulty dissected from it; the left
ovary is enlarged to the size of a small orange, forming a cyst filled with fluid; the right ovary has formed a
cyst, which has ulcerated, and discharged its contents
into the rectum. A probe may be passed from the
cyst into the intestine.
It is surprising that she felt so little pain, her suffer
ings being caused chiefly by her size from the effusion.
This case points out the necessity of carefully ascertain
ing the condition of the uterus in all cases of ovarian
dropsy, before attempting any operation for the removal of the ovarian cyst. It clearly shows the
co-existence of the one with the other. Which was the
primary seat of disease, the uterus or the ovaries, it is
difficult to say; but it is probable that the uterus was
the first to take on disease, from the extent to which
the whole of that organ was affected, and the extensive
adhesions formed between it and the adjacent parts. It is probable the reason she suffered so little pain, was
in consequence of the ulcerative process having so
recently commenced. If the ovarian cyst had grown more rapidly, and acquired a larger size before the
uterus had become so decidedly diseased, and before
the general health had suffered to such an extent, it is
possible that an attempt might have been made to
remove the cyst. It demonstrates the necessity of
great caution and nice discrimination in such cases, as
well as the risk and danger of an operation. Mr. Elkington then presented to the society a
specimen of corroding ulcer of the cervix and os
uteri.
He gave the following account of the case:-Mrs.
Doley, aged 44, has had one child and one abortion:
first felt poorly about Christmas, 1842. A few months
before that time she was a plump, healthy, young
looking woman. In March, 1843, she had pain in her
back, and observed a coloured vaginal discharge. She
consulted my brother, Mr. John Elkington, about the
end of April; at that time she was beginning to get
thinner, complained of aching in her back, and that
her appetite failed her. The uterus was so low down, that my brother was able to see the os uteri without
the aid of the speculum. He says there was a large fissure on the right side of the anterior lip of the
os uteri, and nearly two-thirds of the anterior lip at
that early period was destroyed. About a fortnight after she was seen in consultation with Dr. Ingleby, and examined with the speculum.
The ulceration was distinctly seen, and found to be
rapidly increasing. It was declared to be corroding ulcer. From this time the speculum could not be
used, the attempt to use it causing great pain and some
hemorrhage. The ulceration gradually extended. On
examination per vaginam no hardness surrounding, nor fungoid growth from the surface of the ulceration
could be detected. On making an examination per
vaginam, the finger in passing over the ulceration did
not give much pain. She suffered a martyrdom of
pain, was scarcely ever free from it, and could only obtain relief by the constant use of opiates. She had at times retention of urine, and obstinate constipation. The vaginal discharge varied in quantity, colour, and
quality. Sometimes it was copious, at others, slight; sometimes very offensive, at others not at all so. On
examining per vaginam, at different times, no parti cular hardness of the surrounding structures could be
This content downloaded from 194.29.185.216 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:58:15 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
98 . BIRMINGHAM PATHOLOGICAL SOCIETY.
detected by the finger. About ten days or a fortnight before she died (which was in February last) she had an attack of peritonitis, this was relieved by warm
applications, injections, &c. She then became drowsy, comatose, and apparently easy, so that her friends
thought she was getting better, and requested another consultation.
Post-mortem-External aspect; great emaciation. The abdomen only was examined. The intestines were pale, the rectum, caecum, and colon very much distended by scybala; the pelvic viscera were with
great difficulty removed; the rectum was adhering to the back part of the vagina; the ileum to the
upper and back part of the body of the uterus; the
whole of the cervix and os uteri were destroyed. There is no appearance of fungoid growth from the surface
of the ulceration; it has an even granular surface; the ulceration had extended into the cavity of the
abdomen, and destroyed a portion of the ileum where it adhered to the body of the uterus; the fundus and
body of the uterus are very little, if at all enlarged, and apparently not altered in structure; there is no
particular hardness of the uterus; there is a small
patch of redness at the fore part of the fundus; there is a considerable deposit of hardened matter in the cellular structure at the sides of the pelvis, more par ticularly on the right side, and which has all the
appearance of true scirrhus. It surrounded and
greatly obstructed the termination of both ureters, causing great increase in their size, and also consi derable distension of the pelvis of each kidney, the
right being enlarged to the size of a hen's egg; the
right ureter nearly as large as one of the small intes
tines; on the inside of the bladder, opposite the termination of the right ureter, are pearly white bands of scirrhous matter; the lumbar and mesenteric glands were enlarged, but soft, and when cut into presented the appearance of the internal structure of the spleen, both in colour and consistence. It may be well to observe that the mother of Mrs. D. had uterine
disease, and had suffered from a swelling on the left side of the belly, just above the groin, accompanied by a purulent greenish offensive discharge for nearly three years before her death. She died at 62.
This case presents points of interest and importance. The character and almost constancy of the pain, the
origin and progress of the disease, and its association with disease of the surrounding structures, would lead one to conclude that it was a case of ulcerated scirrhus. But on the other hand we must bear in mind there is no enlargement nor change of structure in the fundus or body of the uterus, and that the ulceration was almost the first symptom observed, and was not pre ceded nor accompanied by any tangible or discernible
hardening of the uterus. The character of the ulce ration when first seen, its progress and appearance as
observed at different times, as well as its condition after death, justify the opinion, that it was corroding ulcer of the cervix and os uteri. I am aware the
opinions of our best authors on the subject are
opposed to such a conclusion. Dr. Ashwell
says, " there is less pain than in cancer of the
womb, from which it also differs in there being no indurated deposit, no immobility, and no fungoid growths in the seat of the ulceration." Dr. Lever
says, " one singular feature is peculiar to this disease,
that there is no deposition of new morbid matter, either in the uterus itself, or in its neighbouring parts." Sir C. Clarke says, "after death there will appear abundant evidences of the destructive process, but no
hardness, no thickening, no deposit of new matter."
Notwithstanding the formidable array of evidence
against such a conclusion, I cannot help considering this as a case of corroding ulcer. Viewing it as a
malignant ulceration, following inflammation of a
specific character, I see no reason why it might not
exist with, or be followed by, deposition of hardened
matter, in the surrounding structures, and more
particularly in the cellular membrane. I think it
possible it might occur in a person with a cancerous
diathesis. Because such has not hitherto been found
to be the case, we are not justified in concluding that
it cannot occur. The opinion of Madame Boivin and
A. Dugs appear to coincide with this view: they say, in their excellent work on diseases of the uterus and
its appendages, translated by Heming:-" But it is
of ulceration, originally seated in the uterus, and
originally ulcerous, that we now speak; we merely
premise that the localcharacters, as well as the general
effects, are absolutely the same in ulceration carried to
its highest degree, whatever may have been its cause, whether it have or have not been preceded by tumours or
deep-seated disease. In the latter case, certain symp toms, peculiar to cancerous tumour, may indeed still
exist; but we must add that the tumefaction and
change of texture may also (though less frequently) be secondary to the progress of cancer essentially and
originally ulcerous." p. 264.
The preparation exhibited may be interesting in
another point of view; in reading us a lesson of
caution as regards the operation of excising the cervix
uteri for ulceration, &c. If excision had been prac tised in this instance, at an early period of the disease, it is very possible the result might not have been suc
cessful, owing to contamination of the cellular structure.
Mr. J. Russell, jun., exhibited a specimen of colloid
cancer, taken from the face of a man. For the parti culars of the case, which are as follows, we are indebted
to Mr. Clayton, one of the dressers of the hospital: John Fenton, aged 71, a widower, by trade a steel
worker, of good general health, consulted my father early in May for a tumour in the left cheek. About
two months previously his attention had been called
to a small lump near the anterior edge of the left
masseter muscle: it was as large as an almond, hard, and perfectly free from pain. The integument covering it was not discoloured. It enlarged rapidly, and in two months was as large as a small egg. When
examined by my father and myself, its 'shape was
somewhat pyramidal, with a base of tolerably firm consistence; but at the apex, where it was soft, obscure fluctuation could be felt. I believe iodine was recom
mended, but without benefit; and a puncture having been made with an exploring needle, nothing but blood flowed out. At this period of the case the tumour was moveable on the subjacent parts, and unattached to the skin, which was quite free from discolouration. Subsequently it grew more rapidly, and became the seat of shooting pain extending towards the ear. The skin became attached, and
acquired a reddish tinge. He was admitted into the
This content downloaded from 194.29.185.216 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:58:15 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
GLOUCESTER INFIRMARY. 99
hospital, June 24; the increase in the size of the tumour proceeding rapidly, and the attachment of it to the skin becoming more general and intimate.
At his admission, he is described as a hale old man, in good flesh; his health not affected, his appetite good, bowels regular, pulse 76, soft. His nights were disturbed by acute pain in the tumour shooting towards the ear. The pain was less severe by day, but was
brought on by handling the tumour, although it was
free from tenderness.
The tumour was as large as an orange; it occupied the left side of the face, reaching fiom the zygoma to the inferior edge of the lower jaw, and from the angle of the jaw behind, forwards to within an inch of the
symphysis. Its surface was smooth and rounded, the skin covering it was of a pink hue, but not traversed
by enlarged veins, and adhered to the tumour. It was
soft, elastic, and fluctuating, on its most prominent part; the base and the part nearest the chin was firm, and had a solid feel. It seemed to be loosely con nected to the parts on which it lay. It did not cause
any paralysis of the muscles of expression; none of the neighbouring absorbents were enlarged.
July 5th. On puncturing the tumour with a bistoury,
only a small quantity of blood escaped, and a soft
gluey substance protruded from the wound. The
operation of removal was at once performed. The base of the tumour adhered intimately to the bucci nator and masseter muscles. The upper part of the
parotid was exposed, and the process of the gland which accompanies the duct was indurated, and
required removal. The softness of the tumour, and its intimate adhesion to the parts in which it was
imbedded, rendered the dissection difficult. The whole of the disease appeared to hare been removed. The tumour was enclosed in a slim but dense cellular
cyst, and consisted of two portions; one soft, pulpy, and adhesive, like glue, contained in numberless cysts, having an amber colour, and forming the great bulk of the swelling; the other solid but not hard, of whitish
colour, resembling firm brain; this firmer portion formed the base of the tumour.
For five days his face went on favourably, but on the 10th of July the wound became painful, red, and hard; a poultice was applied, and the discharge continued pro fuse for several days, when a small fungoid elevation pro truded itself through the wound; this was cauterized
with potassa fusa, but it increased with rapidity. Repeated attempts were made to destroy it with potassa fusa, chloride of zinc, and twice with the actual cautery, but without success. On the 9th of August, a month after the first operation, the tumlour was again removed; it was composed of the same soft gummy masses as at first. For three weeks the granulations appeared so firm and healthy that hopes were entertained that the disease was eradicated, but on the 28th, a fungous
mass again appeared. The remedies before alluded to
only aggravated the mischief; the mass was included in a ligature, but with no better success. Latterly it grew with great rapidity; hemorrhage repeatedly occurred to a large extent; he became greatly emaciated, and complained of much pain at the lower part of the
fungus, and in the epigastric region. He died December
22nd, worn out by pain, by hemorrhage, and by a
profuse feetid discharge, more than five months after the first operation, and four months after the second.
Sectio cadaveris, thirty hours after death; body much emaciated ; a large fungous mass occupied the
left side of the face; it resembled in appearance softened brain; it extended from the lobe of the ear
nearly to the symphysis of the lower jaw, and down
wards as low as the pomum Adami; it was intimately connected with the muscles of the face, but did not
enter into their substance; it was attached to the
periosteum, covering the angle of the lower jaw, which
was very thin and discoloured, though the bone itself
was free from disease, and passed upwards on the
internal surface of the inferior maxillary bone.
Chest.-The lungsperfectly healthy. The endocardium
of the left auricle of the heart thickened and opaque, the valvular apparatus natural, but both the coronary arteries were extensively ossified, one of them being converted into a complete bony tube.
Abdomen.-Liver small and friable; its capsule very
opaque; the gall-bladder thickened and hard;. it
contained about two teaspoonsful of a yellowish fluid, of the consistence of pus, and there were two calculi in
it, filling up a large portion of its cavity. A consi
derable quantity of bile was found in the stomach. All
the other viscera perfectly healthy; not a trace of
the disease existed in any other organ of the body.
Dr. Blakiston exhibited to the Society a specimen of dilatation of the thoracic aorta, which was taken
from a gentleman, aged 45, of very active habits. He had
been slightly troubled with cough on lying down, and
with dyspncea for two years, which symptom had
greatly increased during the last four months, during which time he had not lain down, and constantly leaned forward. When thus leaning the respiratory
murmur was heard in the upper part of the right lung, but when he stood upright, it ceased. From this
circumstance the existence of a moveable tumour in
front of the trachea was made apparent. There was no
abnormal sound, nor any thrill in pulsation. He died
coughing violently. The aneurism was caused by dila
tation of the arch of the aorta, particularly about the
origin of the arteria innominata, was rather larger than a full-sized orange, and adhered chiefly to the
trachea for three inches, just above the bifurcation, and over-lapped the right bronchus, particularly its first
and upper branch, but did not adhere to the parietes of
the chest.
TO THE EDITOR OF THE PROVINCIAL MEDICAL AND,
SURGICAL JOURNAL. SIR,
I am instructed by the Medical Board of this Insti
tution to request the favour of your giving insertion
to the accompanying, in the Provincial Medical and
Surgical Journal. I have the honour to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant, E. G. HILL, Secretary.
Gloucester Infirmary, May 11, 1844.
GLOUCESTER INFIRMARY. Medical Board, May 10, 1844.
Present:
Da. EVANS. MR. FLETCHRR.
DR. FLETCHER. MR. BUCHANAN.
MR. WILTON. MR. WOOD.
On the consideration of a published report of certain
This content downloaded from 194.29.185.216 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:58:15 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions