Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Evolution & Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as
Trade facilitator and ten years taking forward
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 1
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Creditors
S.No Name Roll.No
1. Babita Jain 27
2. Bhawin Saraiya 29
3. Devendra Kant Sahu 31
4. Dhaval Desai 33
5. Dhriti Sachdev 35
6. Deepali Parekh 37
7. Falak Kothari 39
8. Gaurav Modak 41
9. Hardik Mehta 43
10. Harminder Singh Jabal 45
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 2
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
INDEX
S.No Topic Page No.
1. History 4
2. Negotiable Instruments - Introduction 8
3. Characteristics of Negotiable Instruments 10
4. Classification of Negotiable Instruments 16
5. Presentment, Discharge and Dishonor of
negotiable Instruments
28
6. Revolution of Negotiable Instruments 35
7. Future Ahead for Negotiable Instruments 42
8. Case Studies 43
9. Bibliography 45
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 3
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
1. History The history of negotiable instruments is very old.
Common prototypes of bills of exchanges and promissory notes originated in China.
Here, in the 8th century during the reign of the Tang Dynasty, they used special
instruments called feitsyan for the safe transfer of money over long distances.
Later such document for money transfer used by Arab merchants, who had used the
prototypes of bills of exchange – suftadja and hawala in 10–13th centuries, then such
prototypes had used by Italian merchants in the 12th century.
In Italy in 13–15th centuries bill of exchange and promissory note obtain their main
features and further phases of its development have been associated with France (16–18th
centuries, where the endorsement had appeared) and Germany (19th century,
formalization of Exchange Law).
The earliest payment instruments used in India
were coins, which were either punch marked
or cast in silver and copper. (Source: RBI) Source: RBI
In ancient India, loan deed forms were also used. They were called rnapatra or rnalekhya
. They contained details such as the name of the debtor and the creditor, the amount of
loan, the rate of interest, the condition of repayment and the time of repayment. The deed
was witnessed by a person of respectable means and endorsed by the loan-deed writer.
In the Mughal period, the deeds were called dastawez and were of two types: dastawez-e-
indultalab which was payable on demand and dastawez-e-miadi which was payable after
a stipulated time. In the this period, foreign travellers used the bills of exchange in the
then great shopping centres. The Indian bankers also issued bills of exchange on foreign
countries, mainly for financing sea-borne trade. Another instrument used was the Pay
order. It was called Barattes and was similar to the present day drafts or cheques
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 4
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
In the twelth Century, the Hundis was introduced.
Hundis were used
o to transfer funds from one place to another
o to borrow money
o as bills of exchange
In 18th century, the princely states of India had their own distinct coins. An example of
this was the Arcot Rupee coin struck by the Nawab of Arcot in the Madras Presidency.
By 1740, the Europeans had secured the privilege of coining this rupee, and the coins
came to be known as English, Frenchand Dutch arcots.
In 1835, the East India Company introduced the Company's Rupee to bring about
uniformity of coinage over British India.
Paper money, in the modern sense, has its origin in the late 18th century with the note
issues of private banks as well as semi-government banks. Amongst the earliest issues
were those by the Bank of Hindoostan, the General Bank in Bengal and Behar, and the
Bengal Bank.
Later, with the establishment of three Presidency Banks, the job of issuing notes was
taken over by them. Each Presidency Bank had the right to issue notes within certain
limits.
The private banks and the Presidency Banks introduced other payment instruments in the
Indian money market. Cheques were introduced by the Bank of Hindustan, the first joint
stock bank established in 1770.
Post Bills were introduced by the British in 1827. These were Inland Promissory notes
issued by the bank on a distant place, the holder of which would be paid on acceptance
after a specified number of days (seven days' sight or thirty days' sight) and were similar
to muddati hundis. These bills had a much smaller currency than bank notes, mainly
because the government refused to authorise their receipt in payment of public dues.
They were mainly used by European businessmen for purposes of internal remittances.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 5
Source: RBI
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Cash credit accounts were added to the Bank of Bengal's array of credit instruments. The
bank used to grant loans against the security of Company's paper, bullion, plate, jewels or
goods of non-perishable nature or goods not liable to great alteration in their value up to a
limit of 1 lakh sicca rupees.
Buying and selling bills of exchange became one of the items of business to be conducted
by the Bank of Bengal from 1839.
In 1881, the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act) was enacted, formalising the usage and
characteristics of instruments like the cheque, the bill of exchange and promissory note.
The NI Act provided a legal framework for non-cash paper payment instruments in India.
With the development of the banking system and higher turnover in the volume of
cheques, the need for an organized cheque clearing process emerged amongst the banks.
Clearing associations were formed by the banks in the Presidency towns and the final
settlement between member banks was effected by means of cheques drawn upon the
Presidency Banks. With the setting up of the Imperial Bank in 1921, settlement was done
through cheques drawn on that bank.
The Calcutta Clearing Banks' Association, which was the largest bankers' association at
that time, adopted clearing house rules in 1938. The association had twenty-five large
banks as its members and eight sub-members. There were two ordinary clearings on each
business day, except on Saturday when there was one clearing.
However, the association did not cover many banks functioning in Calcutta. The cheques,
drafts etc. of such non-clearing banks were collected by the clearing banks only on
payment of charges. This affected their business prospects adversely, as the public was
not likely to maintain accounts with banks whose cheques suffered a serious handicap of
market acceptability.
To overcome this problem, these banks formed themselves into a group called the
Metropolitan Banking Association with fifty members, which conducted the Metropolitan
Clearing House, in 1939. This association arrived at an understanding with the Calcutta
Clearing House in 1940. In addition, two other clearings were conducted in Calcutta - the
Pioneer clearing and the Walks Clearing.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 6
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
The Bombay Clearing House was the only association to conduct clearings in Bombay. It
had no parallel systems/institutions comparable to the Metropolitan Clearing House of
Calcutta.
The uniform procedures and charges for collection of non-clearing banks' cheques, drafts,
dividend warrants etc. were adopted by the Bombay Clearing House in 1941-42. After
the setting up of Reserve Bank of India under the RBI Act 1935, the Clearing Houses in
the Presidency towns were taken over by Reserve Bank of India.
…
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 7
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
2. Negotiable Instruments – An Introduction
Exchange of goods and services is the basis of every business activity. Goods are bought
and sold for cash as well as on credit. All these transactions require flow of cash either
immediately or after a certain time. In modern business, large number of transactions involving
huge sums of money takes place every day. It is quite inconvenient as well as risky for either
party to make and receive payments in cash. Therefore, it is a common practice for businessmen
to make use of certain documents as means of making payment. Some of these documents are
called negotiable instruments.
A negotiable instrument is a written contract for the payment of money. It is intended as
a substitute for money and passes from one person, called the maker or drawer, to
another, called the payee or drawee or acceptor, as money. (Source: M.C.Kucchal)
+
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 8
NEGOTIABLEmeans
transferable by delivery
NEGOTIABLEmeans
transferable by delivery
INSTRUMENTmeans
a written document
INSTRUMENTmeans
a written document
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTA written document transferable by
delivery
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTA written document transferable by
delivery
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
According to Justice Willis - “ A negotiable instrument is one, property(title) in which is
acquired by any one who takes it bonafide and for value, notwithstanding any defect of
title in the person from whom he took it.”
According to Elvyn Thomas – A Negotiable instrument is one which is by a largely
recognized custom or tradeor by law, transferable by delivery or by endorsement and
delivery in such circumstances that
o The holder of it for time being is made to sue upon it, in his own name
o The property in it passes free from equitiesand free from any defect in the title of
the person from whom he obtained (Source: Moshal)
According to the Section 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in India, a
negotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either
to order or to bearer.
There are just three types of negotiable instruments such as
o Promissory note
o Bill of exchange
o Cheque. ( Cheque also includes Demand Draft [Section 85A].)
ALSO considered as Negotiable Instruments NOT considered as Negotiable Instruments
Treasury Bill Government Promissory Note Dividend Warrant Share Warrant Bearer Debuntures Hundis Port Trust Bonds ImprovementTrust debentures/bonds Bearer railway Bonds
Money Order
Postal Order
Deposite Receipt
Share Certificate
Bill of Lading
Railway Receipt
Wharfinger’s certificate
Letter of Credit
3. Characteristics of a Negotiable Instrument
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 9
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Some of the Prominent characteristics of a negotiable instruments are as follows :
Free Transferability : ( Source: Bhulchandani)
A negotiable instrument may be transferred by delivery if it is a bearer instrument or by
endorsement and delivery if it is an instrument payable to order.
Thus, a Fixed Deposit Receipt, which is marked as ‘not transferable’is not a negotiable
instrument. On the other hand all instruments which are transferable are not negotiable
instruments e.g. share certificate. An instrument to be negotiable must possess other features
also.
Further, a negotiable instrument may be transferred any number of times till it is discharged.
Title of holder free from all defects :
The transferee, who takes the instrument bona fide and for valuable consideration, obtains a
good title despite any defects in the title of the transferor. To this extent, it constitutes an
exception to the general rule that no one can give a better title then he himself has.
Eg. S sells certain goods to B , B gives a promissory note to S for the price. He refuses to pay the
promissory note, claiming that the goods are not according to order. If S sues Bon the note, B’s
defence is good. But if he negotiates the note to H, a holder in due course, B’s defence will be of
no avail
The holder in due course is also not affected by certain defences which might be available
against previous holders, for example, Fraud, provided he himself is not a party to it.
Recovery : The holder in due course can sue upon a negotiable instrument in his own name for
the recovery of the amount, further he need not give notice of transfer to the party liable on the
instrument to pay. Thus the holder in due course can recover the full amount of the instrument.
Presumptions : Certain presumptions to all negotiable instruments, unless contrary is proved.
These presumptions are dealt with in Secs.118 and 119 are as follows:
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 10
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
1. Consideration : That every negotiable instrument is made or drawn, accepted, endorsed,
negotiated or transferred, for consideration. Thus, this need not necessarily be mentioned. This
would help a holder to get a decree from a Court without any difficulty.
2. Date : That the negotiable instrument was drawn on the date shown on the face of it.
3. Time of acceptance : When a bill of exchange has been accepted, it is presumed that it was
accepted within a reasonable time of its date before its maturity.
4.Time of transfer: Every transfer of a negotiable instrument is presumed to have been before
its maturity.
5. Order of Endorsements : That the Endorsements appearing upon a negotiable instrument
were made in the order in which they appear.
6. Stamping of the instrument : That an instrument which has been lost was properly stamped.
7. Holder is Holder in due course : That the holder of a negotiable instrument is the ‘holder in
due course’, except where the instrument has been obtained from its lawful owner or its lawful
custodian by means of offence or fraud.
Example: Suppose Raju borrows 10,000 from Manju using promissory note.Then Manju is
called holder of the promissory note. Suppose Manju borrows 10,000 from Vivek for some
purpose, again using a promissory note. Now Vivek becomes holder of his promissory note.
Now, Manju can give the first promissory note (taken from Raju) to Vivek, so that the amount to
be returned by Manju to Vivek is returned by Raju to Vivek. Hence, Vivek is called HOLDER
IN DUE COURSE.
When he is Holder in Due Course When he is NOT holder in due course
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 11
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
(a) He must be a holder in due course (a) he obtains the negotiable instrument
after its maturity
(b) He must be a holder of valuable
consideration
(b) he obtains it by way of a gift; or
(c) He must become a holder of the
negotiable instrument before the date of
maturity
(c) he obtains it for any unlawful
consideration
(d) He must become a holder of the
negotiable instrument in good faith
(d) he obtains it by some illegal method, or
(e) he does not obtain it bonafide
8. Proof of dishonor : If a suit is filed upon an instrument which has been dishonored, the Court
shall, on proof of the protest, presume the fact of dishonor unless it is disproved.
The above presumptions are rebuttable by evidence. If anyone challenges any of these
presumptions, he has to prove his allegation. Again, these presumptions would not arise where
an instrument has been obtained by any offence, fraud or unlawful consideration.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 12
SECTION 119SECTION 119
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Negotiation:
When a promissory note, a bill of exchange or a cheque is transferred to any person, so as to
constitute that person the holder thereof, the instrument is said to be negotiated.
By negotiation the third party is put in the possession of the instrument and is also made a
holder thereof to entitle him to receive the amount due thereon. We have seen above
negotiation means transfer. Negotiation gives special rights to the holder in due course.
Transfer of a negotiable instrument is affected in any one of the following two ways:
Transfer by negotiation:
Transfer by negotiation is governed by the Negotiable Instruments Act, transfer by assignments is governed by the Transfer of Property Act.
When is an instrument negotiated?
An instrument is negotiated when transferee is constituted the holder of it. Delivery is the
important aspect of negotiability. It constitutes an essential characteristic of negotiable
instrument. The making acceptance or endorsement of a promissory note, bill of exchange or
a cheque is completed by delivery actual or constructive. Delivery therefore to an agent or
any person with an intention to pay and pass the property in he instrument would be
sufficient to transfer the property in the instrument to the payee and constitute the payee
holder thereof.
A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable to bearer is negotiable by delivery
thereof. Therefore, bearer instruments are transferable by mere delivery without
endorsement. The transferee becomes the holder thereof. The effect of such a transfer is that
as transferor does not put his signature on the instrument, he is not liable either to an
immediate party or subsequent holder in case of the instrument being dishonored. The
transferee therefore cannot recover any amount from the transferor.
A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque delivered on condition that it is not to take
effect except in a certain event, is not negotiable (except in the hands of a holder for value
without the notice of the condition) unless such event happens. Therefore, an instrument is
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 13
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
not negotiable when delivered with a condition that it is to take effect on happening of a
certain event. This exception however, does not apply to a holder in due course who has
taken the instrument for value without notice of such a condition
.Illustrations:
1) A the holder of a negotiable instrument payable to bearer it to B’s agent to keep for B. The
instrument has been negotiated.
2) ‘A’ the holder of a negotiable instrument payable to bearer which is in the hand of A’s
banker, who is at the time the banker of B, directs the banker to transfer the instrument to B’s
credit in the bearer’s account with B. The banker does so and accordingly now possesses the
instrument as B’s agent. The instrument has been negotiated and B has become the holder of
it.
Negotiation by endorsement and delivery of order instruments
A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable to order is negotiable by the holder by
endorsement and delivery thereof. Where instrument payable to order is transferred merely
be delivery it is deemed to be assigned and not negotiated. It should be noted that both
negotiation of bearer and order instruments by delivery or by delivery and endorsement are
effective when the instruments is not obtained by unlawful considerations
Transfer by assignment:
When a person transfers his right to receive the payment of a debt, ‘assignment of the debt’
takes place. Thus where the holder of an instrument transfers it to another so as to confer a
right on the transferee to receive the payment of the instrument, transfer by assignment takes
place.
The Negotiable Instruments Act does not deal with transfer of negotiable instruments by
assignment.
Some of the differences in Transfer by Negotiation and Transfer by Assignment are as follows:
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 14
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Transfer by Negotiation Transfer by Assignment
1. Consideration is presumed. 1. Consideration must be proved.
2. The title of the transferee (i.e., the holder
in due course) is better than that of the
transferor.
2.The title of the assignee is subject to the
defects and equities in the title of the
assignor.
3. Notice of transfer to the debtor by the
transferee is not necessary. The acceptor of a
bill and the maker of a note are liable on
maturity to the holder in due course of the
instrument.
3.An assignment does not bind the debtor
until notice of the assignment had been
given by the assignee to the debtor, and
the debtor has, expressly or impliedly,
assented to it.
4.Instruments payable to bearer are
negotiated by mere delivery and instruments
payable to order are negotiated by
endorsement and delivery.
4.An assignment can only be made in
writing-either on the instrument or in a
separate document transferring to the
assignee the transferor’s rights in the
instrument.
…
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 15
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
4. Classification of Negotiable InstrumentsInstruments negotiable by statute: The Negotiable Instruments act mentions only 3 kinds of
negotiable instruments (Sec13) these are Promissory Notes (popularly called pronotes), Bills of
Exchange (popularly called bills) and Cheques. These instruments are negotiable by statute.
Promissory Note
Promissory note is defined as ‘an instrument in writing (not being a bank note or a currency
note) containing an unconditional undertaking, signed by the maker, to pay a certain sum of
money only to or to the order of a certain person or to the bearer of the instrument’.
Suppose you take a loan of Rupees Five Thousand from your friend Sagar. You can make a
document stating that you will pay the money to Sagar or the bearer on demand. Or you can
mention in the document that you would like to pay the amount after three months. This
document, once signed by you, duly stamped and handed over to Sagar, becomes a negotiable
instrument. Now Sagar can personally present it before you for payment or give this document to
some other person to collect money on his behalf. He can endorse it in somebody else’s name
who in turn can endorse it further till the final payment is made by you to whosoever presents it
before you. This type of a document is called a Promissory Note.
Specimen of a Promissory Note
Rs. 10,000/- New Delhi
September 25, 2002
On demand, I promise to pay Sagar, s/o RamLal of Meerut or order a sum of Rs
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), for value received.
To , Sagar Sd/ Sanjay
Address…….. Stamp
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 16
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Parties to a Promissory Note
There are primarily two parties involved in a promissory note. They are
1. The Maker or Drawer – the person who makes the note and promises to pay the amount
stated therein. In the above specimen, Sanjay is the maker or drawer.
2. The Payee – the person to whom the amount is payable. In the above specimen it is Sagar. In
course of transfer of a promissory note by payee and others, the parties involved may be -
a. The Endorser – the person who endorses the note in favor of another person. In the above
specimen if Sagar endorses it in favor of Raj and Raj also endorses it in favor of Puneet, then
Sagar and Raj both are endorsers.
b. The Endorsee – the person in whose favor the note is negotiated by endorsement. In the
above, it is Raj and then Puneet.
(Endorsement means transfer of any document or instrument to another person by signing on its
back or face or on a slip of paper attached to it)
Features of a promissory note
Let us know the features of a promissory note.
i. A promissory note must be in writing, duly signed by its maker and properly stamped as per
Indian Stamp Act.
ii. It must contain an undertaking or promise to pay. Mere acknowledgement of indebtedness is
not enough. For example, if someone writes ‘I owe Rs. 5000/- to Jai Prakash’, it is not a
promissory note.
iii. The promise to pay must not be conditional. For example, if it is written ‘I promise to pay
Suresh Rs 5,000/- after my sister’s marriage’, is not a promissory note.
iv. It must contain a promise to pay money only. For example, if someone writes ‘I promise to
give Harsh a Tata car’ it is not a promissory note.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 17
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
v. The parties to a promissory note, i.e. the maker and the payee must be certain.
vi. A promissory note may be payable on demand or after a certain date. For example, if it is
written ‘three months after date I promise to pay Satya or order a sum of rupees Five Thousand
only’ it is a promissory note.
vii. The sum payable mentioned must be certain or capable of being made certain. It means that
the sum payable may be in figures or may be such that it can be calculated.
Bill of Exchange
Suppose Prem has given a loan of Rupees Ten Thousand to Alok, which Alok has to
return. Now, Prem also has to give some money to Tarun. In this case, Prem can make a
document directing Alok to make payment up to Rupees Ten Thousand to Tarun on demand or
after expiry of a specified period. This document is called a bill of exchange, which can be
transferred to some other person’s name by Tarun.
A bill of exchange is ‘an instrument in writing containing an unconditional order, signed by the
maker, directing a certain person to pay a certain sum of money only to or to the order of a
certain person, or to the bearer of the instrument’.
Specimen of a Bill of Exchange
Rs. 10,000/- New Delhi
May 2,2001
Five months after date pay Tarun or (to his) order the sum of Rupees Ten
Thousand only for value received.
To Accepted Stamp
Alok Alok S/d
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 18
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Address Prem
Parties to a Bill of Exchange
There are three parties involved in a bill of exchange. They are
I. The Drawer – The person who makes the order for making payment. In the above
specimen, Prem is the drawer.
ii. The Drawee – The person to whom the order to pay is made. He is generally a debtor
of the drawer. It is Alok in this case.
iii. The Payee – The person to whom the payment is to be made. In this case it is Tarun.
The drawer can also draw a bill in his own name thereby he himself becomes the payee. Here the
words in the bill would be Pay to us or order. In a bill where a time period is mentioned, just like
the above specimen, is called a Time Bill. But a bill may be made payable on demand also. This
is called a Demand Bill.
Features of a bill of exchange
Let us know the various features of a bill of exchange.
I. A bill must be in writing, duly signed by its drawer, accepted by its drawee and properly
stamped as per Indian Stamp Act.
ii. It must contain an order to pay. Words like ‘please pay Rs 5,000/- on demand and oblige’ are
not used.
iii. The order must be unconditional.
iv. The order must be to pay money and money alone.
v. The sum payable mentioned must be certain or capable of being made certain.
vi. The parties to a bill must be certain.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 19
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Cheques
Cheque is a very common form of negotiable instrument. If you have a savings bank
account or current account in a bank, you can issue a cheque in your own name or in favor of
others, thereby directing the bank to pay the specified amount to the person named in the cheque.
Therefore, a cheque may be regarded as a bill of exchange; the only difference is that the bank is
always the drawee in case of a cheque.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 defines a cheque as a bill of exchange drawn on a
specified banker and not expressed to be payable otherwise than on demand. Actually, a cheque
is an order by the account holder of the bank directing his banker to pay on demand, the
specified amount, to or to the order of the person named therein or to the bearer.
Specimen of a Cheque
………......20.......
Pay……..............................................................................................................
……....................................................................................................... or Bearer
Rupees………………………………………………
……………………………………………………
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi – 110067
MSBL 6 5 3 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 5 6 1 0
Features of a cheque
Let us look into some important features of a cheque.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 20
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
I. A cheque must be in writing and duly signed by the drawer.
ii. It contains an unconditional order.
iii. It is issued on a specified banker only.
iv. The amount specified is always certain and must be clearly mentioned both in figures and
words.
v. The payee is always certain.
vi. It is always payable on demand.
vii. The cheque must bear a date otherwise it is invalid and shall not be honored by the bank.
Types of Cheque
Cheque
Classification 1
Open Cheque
Crossed Cheque
Bearer Cheque
Order Cheque
Classification 2
Ante-dated cheque
Stale Cheque
Mutilated Cheque
Post-dated Cheque
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 21
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Let us know details about these cheques.
a) Open cheque: A cheque is called ‘Open’ when it is possible to get cash over the counter at
the bank. The holder of an open cheque can do the following:
I. Receive its payment over the counter at the bank,
ii. Deposit the cheque in his own account
iii. Pass it to someone else by signing on the back of a cheque.
b) Crossed cheque: Since open cheque is subject to risk of theft, it is dangerous to issue such
cheques. This risk can be avoided by issuing other types of cheque called ‘Crossed cheque’. The
payment of such cheque is not made over the counter at the bank. It is only credited to the bank
account of the payee. A cheque can be crossed by drawing two transverse parallel lines across
the cheque, with or without the writing ‘Account payee’ or ‘Not Negotiable’.
c) Bearer cheque: A cheque which is payable to any person who presents it for payment at the
bank counter is called ‘Bearer cheque’. A bearer cheque can be transferred by mere delivery and
requires no endorsement.
d) Order cheque: An order cheque is one which is payable to a particular person. In such a
cheque the word ‘bearer’ may be cut out or cancelled and the word ‘order’ may be written. The
payee can transfer an order cheque to someone else by signing his or her name on the back of it.
There is another categorization of cheques which is discussed below:
Ante-dated cheques:- Cheque in which the drawer mentions the date earlier to the date of
presenting if for payment. For example, a cheque issued on 20th May 2003 may bear a date 5th
May 2003.
Stale Cheque:- A cheque which is issued today must be presented before at bank for payment
within a stipulated period. After expiry of that period, no payment will be made and it is then
called ‘stale cheque’. Find out from your nearest bank about the validity period of a cheque.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 22
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Mutilated Cheque:- In case a cheque is torn into two or more pieces and presented for payment,
such a cheque is called a mutilated cheque. The bank will not make payment against such a
cheque without getting confirmation of the drawer. But if a cheque is torn at the corners and no
material fact is erased or cancelled, the bank may make payment against such a cheque.
Post-dated Cheque:- Cheque on which drawer mentions a date which is subsequent to the date
on which it is presented, is called post-dated cheque. For example, if a cheque presented on 8th
May 2003 bears a date of 25th May 2003, it is a post-dated cheque. The bank will make payment
only on or after 25th May 2003.
Negotiable by custom or usage
There are certain other instruments which have acquired the character of negotiability by the
usage or customer trade. For example in England the following instruments have been held to be
negotiable by custom namely Exchequer bills , bank notes , share warrants , circular note , barer
debentures , dividend warrants , share certificates with blank transfer deeds etc. The list of
negotiable instruments does appear to be flexible and inclusive. The court in india usually
follows the practice of English Courts in according the character of negotiability to other
instruments.
Section (137) of the transfer of property act also recognizes the negotiability of instruments by
law or custom. Thus in India Government promissory notes , banks draft and pay orders , Hundis
(a popular indigenous document prevalent in India) , delivery orders and railway receipts for
goods have been held to be negotiable by usage or custom.
Bank draft
A bank draft is an order issued by one bank on another bank or on its own branch (usually drawn on its own branch) instructing the latter to pay a specified sum of money to a specified person or his order. It is a negotiable instrument and is very much like a cheque , with the following distinctions:
a. It can be drawn only by a bank on another bank or on its branch and not by an individual as in case of a cheque.
b. It cannot so easily be countermanded as a cheque.e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 23
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
c. It cannot be payable to bearer.
Hundis
A Hundi is a negotiable instrument by usage. It is often in the form of a bill of exchange drawn
in any local language in accordance with the custom of the place. Sometimes it can also be in the
form of a promissory note. A hundi is the oldest known instrument used for the purpose of
transfer of money without its actual physical movement. The provisions of the Negotiable
Instruments Act shall apply to hundis only when there is no customary rule known to the people.
Types of Hundis
There are a variety of hundis used in our country. Let us discuss some of the most common ones.
1. Shah-jog Hundi: This is drawn by one merchant on another, asking the latter to pay the
amount to a Shah. Shah is a respectable and responsible person, a man of worth and known in the
bazaar. A shah-jog hundi passes from one hand to another till it reaches a Shah, who, after
reasonable enquiries, presents it to the drawee for acceptance of the payment.
2. Darshani Hundi: This is a hundi payable at sight. It must be presented for payment within a
reasonable time after its receipt by the holder. Thus, it is similar to a demand bill.
3. Muddati Hundi: A muddati or miadi hundi is payable after a specified period of time. This is
similar to a time bill.
There are few other varieties like Nam-jog hundi, Dhani-jog hundi, Jawabee hundi, Jokhami
hundi, Firman-jog hundi, etc.
Other classifications:
Accommodation bill:
An accommodation bill is one which has been signed by a person, as a drawer, against acceptor
or endorser without any consideration which fails with a view to oblige some other person to
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 24
SECTION 43SECTION 43
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
provide him with funds. It is done to accommodate friends who are not in an immediate position
to pay consideration. the person who signs, accepts, or indorses a bill without receiving any
consideration is said to have lent his name to an Accommodation Bill.
Suppose you are in need of ` 10,000 and you approach your friend Samir to borrow the money.
Samir suggests that you may draw a bill on him which he would accept. You may now get the
bill discounted with the banker and realize the amount to meet his immediate requirement of
money. On the due date, you would pay ` 10,000 to Samir, who would then honour the bill,
when presented to him for payment on due date. Samir has accommodated you. This is an
Accommodation Bill.
Fictitious Bill:
A bill is fictitious when both the parties the drawer and payee are fictitious persons. Where the
drawer is also the payee on the bill, without any intention that payment shall be made in
conformity with the instrument, the instrument is fictitious. Also when payee is non exsisting the
instrument is fictitious.
A fictitious bill in the hands of a holder in due course becomes a good bill. The acceptor is liable
to a holder in due course, if the holder in due course can show that the signature of the supposed
drawer and that of the first endorser or the payee are under the same hand. The liability of the
holder in case of the fictitious bill is only towards the holder in due course.
Escrow:
A bill delivered conditionally is called an escrow. Where a bill or a note delivered id delivered
conditionally, the liability of the party delivering does not commence till the happening of the
event or the fulfillment of the condition. The rights of the holder in due course are not affected.
Such a bill may also be delivered for a special purpose as a collateral security.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 25
SECTION 42SECTION 42
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
For example: A makes a note in favor of his servant and hands it to his solicitor telling to retain
the note till his death and then to hand it over to the servant if he should still continue in service.
If these conditions are compiled with and solicitors hands over the instrument to the servant, the
servant can claim the amount of the note from the administrators of his masters estate.
Inchoate Stamped Instruments Sec (20):
It is an incomplete instrument. When one person signs and delivers to another a paper stamp in
accordance with the law relating to the negotiable instrument, than in force in India and either
holy blank or having written there on, he here by gives “prima facie” authority to the holder
thereof to make a complete as the case maybe, upon it a negotiable instrument , for any amount
specified there in , and not exceeding the amount covered by the stamp. The person so signing
shall be liable upon such instrument, in the capacity in which he signed the same to any holder in
due course for such amount. However no person other than a holder, in due course, shall recover
from the delivering the instrument anything in excess of the amount intended by him to be paid
their under.
The person signs a stamped paper either wholly blank, or leaves it incomplete. The person giving
blank instrument gives authority to the holder to complete it with appropriate amount up to the
same value of the instrument. The holder is authorized to complete the instrument. If the first
holder does not fill it up, any subsequent holder may do so. The holder cannot recover the
amount in excess of the amount intended to be paid by such signatory. The holder in due course
can, however, recover any amount on such instrument. The principle is one of Estoppel. The
person who so signs a blank or incomplete instrument gives the other authority to fill it up, for
which the persons so signing is liable.
Instrument may be incomplete as regards date, amount, drawer, payee, etc. The holder may fill
any of the particulars to make it a negotiable instrument. As long as the instrument is blank or
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 26
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
incomplete, it is not a valid negotiable instrument. The liability of the person signing a blank
instrument, therefore, arises only when the instrument is complete.
In order to make the signatory of inchoate instrument liable to the holder, falling conditions must
be fulfilled:
1. The inchoate instrument must be signed and delivered to another person by the signor.
2. Such an instrument must be adequately stamped in accordance with law in force, at the
time of delivering the same.
3. Instrument must be filled in before the signatory could be held liable.
4. The amount to be filled in by the holder must not exceed the stamp value on the
instrument, or what was intended to or agreed upon by the signatory to be paid. This
however , does not apply to a holder in due course , who is entitled to recover any amount
filled in by him on the instrument , even though it exceeds what was u=intended to or
agreed upon by the signatory of inchoate instrument.
…
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 27
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
5. Presentment, Discharge and Dishonor of Negotiable Instruments
Presentment
Presentment is a process of presenting or placing the instrument before the party who is suppose to accept the liability on it or pay out it on the date of maturity. It is presented by the holder or payee of an instrument.
Presentment of negotiable instrument may be made
1) For acceptance, in case of bill of exchange.
2) For sight, in case of promissory note.
3) For payment in case of a bill, note and a cheque.
Presentment for Acceptance
An acceptance implies expression of intention to have accepted the direction given by the drawer for making payment. It is done by writing a word or “Accepted” and sign the name below it.
Following types of bill need not be presented for acceptance.
A bill payable on demand. A bill payable certain number of days after date. A bill payable on certain days.
However, presentment for acceptance is necessary in the following cases:
1) Where the bill is payable at a given time after acceptance or “After sight”. Such bills must be presented to the drawee for his sight or acceptance as to determine maturity if the bill.
2) Where the bill contains express stipulation that it shall be presented for acceptance. Such bills must be presented for acceptance before it is presented for payment.
Presentment of Promissory Note for Sight
According to section 62 of this act,” a promissory note payable at a certain period after sight, must be presented to the maker thereof, for sight (if he can, after search be found) by a person entitled to demand payment, within a reasonable time after it is made and during business, hours on a business day”.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 28
SECTION 62SECTION 62
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
In other words, the payment cannot be demanded till the note has been exhibited to the maker. When a promissory note is not made payable at a certain period after sight, it must be presented for sight in order to fix the maturity of that note.
If default is made in such presentment, all the antecedent parties are discharged from liability to the person making such default. No presentment is required for promissory notes payable” at
Sight”, “on demand” or “on a fixed day”, or “on the expiry of a fixed period”.
Presentment for payment
Like acceptance, the negotiable instrument must be duly presented for payment to the party liable to pay.
According to section 64 of this act, “Promissory notes, the bill of exchange and cheque must be presented for payment to the maker, acceptor or drawee thereof respectively by or on behalf of the holder.”
In default of such presentment, the other parties thereto are not liable thereon to such holder.
Discharge of Negotiable Instrument
A negotiable instrument is said to be discharged when the rights and obligation created by it come to an end. It ceases to be a negotiable instrument and no action can be taken even by the holder in due course upon it.
In other words, negotiable instrument gets discharged when the party who is primarily liable to pay on the instrument is discharged from his liability.
A negotiable instrument is said to be discharged under the following situation:
1) Payment of instrument: When the party primarily liable on the instrument i.e. the maker of the note or acceptor of a bill of exchange or the drawee bank in case of a cheque makes the payment in due course, at or after maturity to the holder.
2) Negotiation Back: When a bill of exchange, during the course of negotiation is negotiated back to the acceptor of the bill and he becomes the holder at or after maturity, the bill is said to be discharged.
3) Release of debtor: When the holder of an instrument releases the debtor who is primarily liable to pay, all other parties will automatically be released and an instrument gets discharged.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 29
SECTION 64SECTION 64
SECTION 82(c) & 78SECTION 82(c) & 78
SECTION 82(a)SECTION 82(a)
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
4) Cancellation of Instrument: When the holder of an instrument gets the instrument cancelled and consequently the party primarily liable to pay is released, that instrument will be discharged.
5) Non presentment of a Bill for Acceptance:
Where the presentment of a bill for acceptance is necessary, the holder makes default with regard to such presentment, it will be discharged.
6) Mutual agreement: A negotiable instrument creates rights and obligations between or amongst the parties. In case all parties to an instrument agree to discharge it will be discharged by mutual agreement.
Dishonour of a Negotiable Instrument A negotiable instrument is said to be dishonoured, if the party liable to accept or pay, refuse to do so on proper presentation (for acceptance) or at or after maturity as the case may be(for payment). A bill of exchange may be dishonoured either by non-acceptance or by non-payment. But promissory note and cheque may be dishonoured only by non-payment.
A) Dishonour by non-acceptance
According to section 91 of this act, “a bill of exchange whether payable ‘after date’ or ‘after sight’ will be treated as dishonoured by non-acceptance under the following situation.”
1) Where the bill is presented properly to the drawee for acceptance, he refuses to accept it or does not give his acceptance within 48 hours.
2) Where the presentment for acceptance was excused and the drawee does not accept the bill.
3) Where the drawee is incompetent to contract.4) Where the drawee gives qualified acceptance.5) Where the drawee is fictitious person or after a reasonable search cannot be found.
However, it is to be noted that in a bill, if the “drawee in case of need” is named, it will not be treated as dishonoured unless such drawee refuses to accept the bill.
B) Dishonour by non-payment
According to section 92 of this act, “a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque is said to be dishonoured by a non-payment, when the maker, of the note, acceptor of a bill and drawee of a cheque makes default in payment upon being duly required to pay the same.”
According to section 76 of this act, “an instrument is also taken as dishonoured by non-payment, when the presentment for payment is excused an instrument when overdue remains unpaid.”
By and to whom notice should be given
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 30
SECTION 91SECTION 91
SECTION 92SECTION 92
SECTION 93SECTION 93
SECTION 82(a)SECTION 82(a)
SECTION 61SECTION 61
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
When a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque is dishonoured by non-acceptance or nonpayment,the holder thereof, or some party thereto who remains liable thereon, must give notice that the instrument has been so dishonoured to all other parties whom the holder seeks to make severally liable thereon, and to some one of several parties whom he seeks to make jointly liable thereon.
Nothing in this section renders it necessary to give notice to the maker of the dishonoured promissory note or the drawee or acceptor of the dishonoured bill of exchange or cheque.
Mode in which notice may be give:
Notice of dishonour may be given to a duly authorized agent of the person to whom it is required to be given, or, where he has died, to his legal representative, or, where he has been declared an insolvent, to his assignee; may be oral or written; may, if written, be sent by post; and may be in any form; but it must inform the party to whom it is given, either in express terms or by reasonable intendment, that the instrument has been dishonoured, and in what way, and that he Will be held liable thereon; and it must be given within a reasonable time after dishonour, at the place of business or (in case such party has no place of business) at the residence of the party for whom it is intended.If the notice is duly directed and sent by post and miscarries, such miscarriage does not render the notice invalid.
Party receiving must transmit notice of dishonor Party receiving must transmit notice of dishonour. Any party receiving notice of dishonour must, in order to render any prior party liable to himself, give notice of dishonour to such party within a reasonable time, unless such party otherwise receives due notice as provided by section 93.
Agent for presentment When the instrument is deposited with an agent for presentment, the agent is entitled to the same time to give notice to his principal as if he were the holder giving notice of dishonour, and the principal is entitled to a further like period to give notice of dishonour.
When notice of dishonor is unnecessary No notice of dishonor is necessary-
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 31
SECTION 94SECTION 94
SECTION 95SECTION 95
SECTION 96SECTION 96
SECTION 98SECTION 98
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
when it is dispensed with by the party entitled thereto;
in order to charge the drawer when he has countermanded payment;
when the party charged could not suffer damage for want of notice;
when the party entitled to notice cannot after due search be found ; or the party bound to give notice is, for any other reason, unable without any fault of his own to give it;
to charge the drawers, when the acceptor is also a drawer;
in the case of a promissory note which is not negotiable;
when the party entitled to notice, knowing the facts, promises unconditionally to pay the amount due on the instrument.
Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for
payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in
whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of
the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or
that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that
bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall without prejudice to
any other provisions of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 2["a term which may extend
to two year"], or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both
Dishonor of Bill of Exchange (Source: http://www.accountingexplanation.com )
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 32
SECTION 138SECTION 138
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
A bill of exchange is said to be dishonored when its acceptor refuses to pay the amount of the
bill to the holder of the bill on its maturity. The bill then becomes useless and the party from
whom it has been received will be liable to pay for the amount. It is very important to know that,
when a bill is dishonored, in whose possession it was? Because when a bill is dishonored, all the
parties involved are effected and books of accounts of all the parties have to be adjusted. For
example, A draws a bill of `5,000 on B and B accepts it and returns it to A. A retains the bill in
his possession till the due date. On the due date the bill is not honored by the acceptor. We can
see, there are two parties involved whose books are to be adjusted. If suppose, A has discounted
or endorsed the bill, then there are three parties involved and books of accounts of all the parties
are effected.
Noting Charges:
When a bill is dishonored, the holder of the bill, (drawer, banker, endorsee or any other party) in
order to make a strong ground for drawing legal proceeding against the acceptor may get the
official recognition that the bill has been dishonored. He goes to an official called notary public,
and gives the bill to him. The notary public will present the bill for payment again to the acceptor
and if the money is received he will hand over the money to the original party. But if the bill is
again dishonored, the notary public will note the fact of dishonor and the reasons of the dishonor
on the bill and will give the bill back to the holder of the bill. It is now a strong evidence against
the acceptor, in case, if the case is filed in the court.
For this service, the notary public will charge a small fee obviously from the holder of the bill.
This fee is known as "noting charges" and is always recoverable from the party responsible for
dishonor (the acceptor).
It must be remembered that noting charges are not the expenses of any party involved. They are
always expenses of the acceptor in whose books they will be debited.
Who Pays Noting Charges:
1. If the bill is retained by the drawer, the drawer will pay the noting charges.
2. If the bill has been discounted the bank will pay.
3. If the bill has been endorsed to the endorsee, the endorsee will pay.
4. If the endorsee has endorsed the bill to his creditor (a new endorsee), the new endorsee will
pay.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 33
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
But the new endorsee will recover the noting charges from first endorsee, the first endorsee from
the drawer and ultimately the drawer from the acceptor (being an expense of acceptor).
Example:
On 1st Jan. 2005. the X sold goods to Y. for `10,000 on credit basis. On the same date X drew a
bill for `10,000 on Y. at two months. Y accepted the bill and returned it to X. On the due date Y
could not honor acceptance.
When the goods were sold to Y, he became a debtor for `10,000. Then he paid his debts by
giving acceptance (B/R) to X. But when he did not honor his acceptance on the due date, he
again became a debtor of X. (Amount is still due from him).
In the above example, the drawer (X) has not got the bill noted by the notary public and so no
noting charges were paid by him.
Suppose if he also paid `40 as noting charges, then a further entry will have to be made both in
the books of X as well as in the books of Y.
…
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 34
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
6. Revolution of Negotiable Instruments
Plastic Money Plastic money is a term that is used predominantly in reference to the hard plastic cards we use
every day in place of actual bank notes. With advent of technology, use of plastic money is
increasingly becoming popular. They can come in many different forms such as cash cards,
credit cards, debit cards, pre-paid cash cards and store cards.
Cash Cards - A card that will allow you to withdraw money directly from your bank via
an Authorised Teller Machine (ATM) but it will not allow the holder to purchase
anything directly with it.
Credit Cards - Again this card will permit the card holder to withdraw cash from an
ATM, and a credit card will allow the user to purchase goods and services directly, but
unlike a Cash Card the money is basically a high interest loan to the card holder, although
the card holder can avoid any interest charges by paying the balance off in full each
month.
Debit Cards - This type of card will directly debit money from your bank account, and
can directly be used to purchase goods and services. While there is no official credit
facility with debit cards per se, as it is linked to the bank account the limit is the limit of
what is in the account, for instance if an overdraft facility is available then the limit will
be the extent of the overdraft.
Pre-paid Cash Cards - As the name suggests the user will add credit to the card
themselves, and will not exceed that amount. These are usually re-useable in that they can
be 'topped up' however some cards, usually marketed as Gift Cards are not re-useable and
once the credit has been spent they are disposed of.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 35
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Store Cards - These are similar in concept to the Credit Card model, in that the idea is to
purchase something in store and be billed for it at the end of the month. These cards can
be charged at a very high interest rate and can are limited in the places they can be used,
sometimes as far as only the store brand that issued it.
Electronic Money
Electronic money or e-money is money or scrip that is only exchanged electronically.
Typically, this involves the use of computer networks, the internet and digital stored
value systems
Other names for such type of money are e-currency, e-money, electronic cash, electronic
currency, digital money, digital cash, digital currency, cyber currency.
Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT), direct deposit, digital gold currency and virtual currency are all examples of electronic money. Also, it is a collective term for financial
cryptography and technologies enabling it.
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT)
It is the electronic exchange or transfer of money from one account to another, either
within a single financial institution or across multiple institutions, through computer-
based systems. National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) is a nation-wide payment
system facilitating one-to-one funds transfer. Under this Scheme, individuals, firms
and corporates can electronically transfer funds from any bank branch to any
individual, firm or corporate having an account with any other bank branch in the
country participating in the Scheme
The RBI recently clarified that the same set of rules against dishonour of cheque,
according to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, will apply to
dishonour of electronic fund transfer instruction. (ET, 30 Oct, 2011)
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 36
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS)
It is continuous (real-time) settlement of funds transfers individually on an order by
order basis (without netting). 'Real Time' means the processing of instructions at the
time they are received rather than at some later time.'Gross Settlement' means the
settlement of funds transfer instructions occurs individually (on an instruction by
instruction basis). Considering that the funds settlement takes place in the books of
the Reserve Bank of India, the payments are final and irrevocable
Electronic Clearing Service (ECS)
It is a mode of electronic funds transfer from one bank account to another bank account using the
services of a Clearing House. This is normally for bulk transfers from one account to many
accounts or vice-versa. This can be used both for making payments like distribution of dividend,
interest, salary, pension, etc. by institutions or for collection of amounts for purposes such as
payments to utility companies like telephone, electricity, or charges such as house tax, water tax,
etc or for loan installments of financial institutions/banks or regular investments of persons
Internet Banking
It is a system allowing individuals to perform banking activities at home, via the internet.
Online banking through traditional banks enable customers to perform all routine
transactions, such as account transfers, balance inquiries, bill payments, and stop-payment
requests, and some even offer online loan and credit card applications.
Account information can be accessed anytime, day or night, and can be done from anywhere.
A few online banks update information in real-time, while others do it daily.
All e-banking services are secured by PIN/TAN system where the PIN represents a
password, used for the login and TANs representing one-time passwords to authenticate
transactions
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 37
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Mobile Banking
Mobile Banking refers to provision and availment of banking- and financial services with the
help of mobile telecommunication devices. The scope of offered services may include
facilities to conduct bank and stock market transactions, to administer accounts and to access
customized information."
They can be leveraged for performing balance checks, account transactions, payments, credit
applications and other banking transactions through a mobile device such as a mobile phone
or Personal Digital Assistant (PDA)
The earliest mobile banking services were offered over SMS. With the introduction of the
first primitive smart phones with WAP support enabling the use of the mobile web I banks
started to offer mobile banking on this platform to their customers
Electronic Cheques
With amendments in the Sections 6 and 1(4), coupled with the introduction of 81 A to the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, e-cheque system was legalized in 2006
Electronic cheques are another form of Electronic tokens. They are designed to accommodate
the many individuals and entities that might prefer to pay on credit or through some
mechanism other than cash. Once registered, a buyer can then contact sellers of goods and
services.
To complete a transaction, the buyer sends a check to the seller for a certain amount of
money. These checks may be sent using Email or other Transport methods. When deposited,
the cheque authorises the transfer of account balances from the account against which the
cheque was drawn to the account to which the cheque was deposited.
Biometrics
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 38
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Biometric payment is a point of sale (POS) technology that uses biometric authentication to
identify the user and authorize the deduction of funds from a bank account. Fingerprint
payment, based on finger scanning, is the most common biometric payment method. Often,
the system uses two-factor authentication, in which the finger scan takes the place of the card
swipe and the user types in a PIN (personal ID number) as usual.
Here's an example of how one fingerprint payment system works:
i. The shopper registers for a biometric program at a store kiosk by presenting valid
identification and bank account information.
ii. The shopper scans his index finger using the kiosk’s finger scanner reader.
iii. The store's finger scan reader encrypts multiple point-to-point measurements of the
fingerprint and stores the customer's biometric data and banking information in a centralized
database.
iv. The shopper now has the option of selecting biometric payment at the point of sale
register. If he chooses biometric payment, he scans his finger at the checkout register with
the store's electronic reader and enters his personal identification number.
v. The electronic reader compares the data from the new scan to the encrypted data in the
database and either approves or declines the transaction. If approved, the funds are
electronically transferred from the shopper's account to the merchant.
In the United States, biometric payment has gained popularity in grocery stores, gas stations
and convenience stores. In March 2006, Pay by Touch, the leading biometric payment
provider, reported that more than two million customers had enrolled in their biometric
services and that Pay by Touch had authenticated approximately $8 billion in transactions.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 39
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Cited advantages of biometric payment include:
Enhanced security for the end user.
Speedy transactions.
No need for the end user to carry cash, checks or credit cards.
Lower cost per transaction for the merchant, compared to standard debit or charge card fees.
Biometric payment is controversial. Traditionally, fingerprints have been associated with law
enforcement. Critics of biometric payment fear that fingerprints could be made available to
government agencies or law enforcement officials. Biometric payment service providers are
quick to point out that they don't keep the customer's actual fingerprint in their databases --
they keep an encrypted number derived from the finger's point-to-point measurements. (It is
that number which is used to verify a customer's identity, not the actual fingerprint.) In the
final analysis, a biometric payment system -- like any system that accesses sensitive
information -- is only as secure as the associated databases and transactions.
Cheque Trunctation Solution (CTS)
Cheque truncation is the conversion of physical cheque into electronic form for transmission
to the paying bank. Cheque truncation eliminates cumbersome physical presentation of the
cheque and saves time and processing costs.
Cheque Truncation Solution is a big milestone in the Indian banking industry. It enables
cheque clearing on the same day, reducing floating time available for funds.
Instead of manually moving the cheque from one bank to another for payment, we would
now use images. This will bring down the time required for processing.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 40
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Earlier, it would take two to three days. Cheques would now be cleared on the same day or
the next day, thereby bringing efficiency into the entire banking system.
From the banks' prospective, it will bring efficiency to their system. You can reduce frauds,
though not eliminate them completely, with the help of truncation.
It will also reduce the work time and manpower required at a service branch or a branch
manning these activities through human interface. Automation will bring down the operating
costs.
India is doing something very unique because it has a very large cheque volume. It processes
about 1.2 billion instruments annually. The National Capital Region alone processes 6,00,000
cheques in a day. Countries such as Singapore have 4,00,000 instruments daily.
Large corporates and government agencies, which transact in a large number of cheques,
could have tie-ups with their banks. Instead of sending the physical cheques, they can send
them scan images to the branch concerned, which would then forward it to RBI for
settlement.
The truncation can also be done at ATMs. You could send the image of the cheque by
inserting it in the machine. The captured image will be sent to the service branch for
settlement and clearing. Customers would get a receipt.
Banks can do a huge amount of analyis using the cheque images. The customer's payment
pattern would become known to the banks, who can then undertake cross selling, should they
want.
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 41
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
7. Future Ahead for Negotiable Instruments
Several financial analysts and experts are predicting a great future for M-banking not only in
the Asia-Pacific but across the globe. Juniper Research is one such institution that predicted
that mobile phone banking would revolutionize the banking and financial services in a
similar manner that ATMs revolutionized the sector several years ago. The analyst firm
predicted that by 2011, US $587 billion worth of financial instructions would be generated
by over 612 million mobile phone subscribers worldwide.
A similar forecast was given by Berg Insight, indicating that mobile phone banking users will
grow to 85 million in the United States and 115 million in Europe by the year 2015, while
total worldwide usage will grow to 913 million by the year 2012 with a CAGR of 89%. Asia-
Pacific will account for up to 65% of total users and will be the most important market.
According to KPMG, M-banking will have the biggest opportunities in China, India,
Indonesia and the Philippines, while strong adoption rates will also occur in Thailand,
Malaysia and Vietnam.
These figures indicate that mobile phones and devices will be a primary digital mobile
channel for banking and financial services and will usher in the next generation of the
modern financial system, a trend that is fast becoming a reality in the Asia-Pacific region
…
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 42
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
8. Case Studies
Promissory Note
Case A.N.Kamalamma vs K.R.Vijayan Pillai
Judgement Date 17 March, 2010
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
Judge HARUN-UL-RASHID
Synopsis: A woman named Mayadevi availed a loan of Rs.40,000/- from the plaintiff agreeing to repay it within a short time. Deceased Mayadevi executed a promissory note on 19.7.1992 agreeing to repay the amount as and when demanded. Mayadevi expired on 29.12.1992. Plaintiff alleged that since Mayadevi expired within a short period she demanded money from the legal heirs of deceased Mayadevi. Legal heirs did not repay the amount. Therefore a lawyer notice was issued on 24.2.1992 demanding the sum. Since the amount was not paid even after lawyer notice, the suit was filed.
Judgement: The Plaintiff won the case. He was allowed to realise a sum of Rs.42,500/- with an interest at the rate of 9% from the date of suit till the date of decree and future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation.
Dishonour of cheque
Case Anita Malhotra vs Apparel Export Promotion Council
Judgement Date 08 Nov 2011
Court [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, New Delhi
Judge P. Sathasivam
Synopsis: Appellant Anita Malhotra, non-executive Director of the accused Company, resigned from Directorship on 31-8-1998 and filed statutory Form 32 with the
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 43
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
Registrar of Companies on 20-11-1998. 1st respondent company (Apparel Export Promotion Council) issued legal notice to appellant regarding dishonour of cheques under section 138 of the Act. Appellant replied that she had resigned from the Directorship of the accused Company long back in 1998. 1st respondent filed criminal complaint against appellant in Magistrate Court. Appellant filed petition before the HC for quashing the criminal complaint. HC dismissed appellant's petition.Whether the appellant had made out a case for quashing the criminal complaint filed by the respondents under section 138 of the Act. Held, certified copy of the annual return of the accused Company was a public document, more particularly, in view of the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 r/w s. 74(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which showed that the appellant had validly resigned from the Directorship of the Company even in the year 1998 and thus, she should not be held responsible for the dishonour of the cheques issued in the year 2004. Further, in para 4 of the complaint, except the mere bald and cursory statement with regard to the appellant, the complainant had not specified her role in the day to day affairs of the accused Company .
Judgement: It was clear that Appellant established that she had resigned from the accused Company as a Director in 1998, well before the relevant date, namely, in the year 2004, when the cheques were issued, the HC, in the light of the acceptable materials such as certified copy of annual return and Form 32 ought to have exercised its jurisdiction under section 482 of CrPC and quashed the criminal proceedings. Appellant had made out a case for quashing the criminal proceedings, hence, impugned criminal complaint was quashed . Appeal allowed. Anita Malhotra Won the case
…
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 44
Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as Trade Facilitator and 10 years ahead
9. Bibliography
Books :
Business Law – M.C.Kucchal, 5th Edition
Modern Business Law – B.S. Moshal
Business Law – K.R. Bhulchandani, 9th Edition
Elements of Merchantile Law – N.D. Kapoor
Websites :
http://www.indiankanoon.org
http://www.vakilno1.com
http://www.netlawman.co.in
http://www.accountingexplanation.com/dishonor_of_bill_of_exchange.htm
http://www.uncitral.org
http://money.blurtit.com/q216104.html
http://www.legalserviceindia.com/article/l325-E-Cheque-System-in-India.html
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com
http://www.legalera.in
http://www.banking.indlaw.com/updates/judgments.aspx
http://www.rediff.com/money/2008/feb/21inter.htm
http://www.kgsepg.com/project-id/3413-negotiable-instrument-act
…
e-MBA | Div-A | 2011-13 | Page 45