7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
1/22
1
ChinaLivingWageStudyJanuary2011MindiSchneider(forSolidaridad)INTRODUCTION
Calculatingalivingwageisalwaysacomplexandcontestedprocess,particularlyintermsofdefiningparametersthatappropriatelyreflectlocalconditions.InChina,therearenumeroussocial,economic,andpoliticalfactorsthatfurthercomplicatethisprocess.Weoutlinethesechallengesthroughoutthereport.Thewageoverviewsandanalysespresentedherearebasedondeskworkusingthemostuptodateofficialstatistics,andonfieldbaseddatacollection.InJanuary2011,weadministeredsurveysto133garmentworkersintwoofChinasSpecialEconomicZones:ShenzheninGuangdongProvince,andXiameninFujianProvince1.WealsoconductedstakeholderinterviewswithCSRpractitionersandworkersinthesetwoareas.
I.BACKGROUNDINFORMATIONA.ChinasLegalMinimumWageDuringthestateruneconomyerainChinapriorto1978,wageslevels,bonuses,andbenefitsforworkersweresetandcontrolledbythestate.Workersreceivedincomeandasetofsocialprotections(healthcare,pensions,education,etc.)throughtheirworkunits,whichwerestateownedenterprises(SOEs).Referredtoastheironricebowl,thiswasasystemthatensuredcradletogravesocialsecurityformostofChinasworkers.
Startinginthe1980s,andmoresointhe1990s,thecentralgovernmentbegantoliberalizeSOEs,allowingthemtoestablishtheirowninternalwagestructureswithinoverallwagebudgetssetbythestate.In1994,theLabourLawofthePeoplesRepublicofChina2grantedSOEscompleteindependencetodeterminewagesbasedsolelyonproductivityandprofitability.The1994LabourLawalsoestablishedthefirstminimumwagesysteminChinaadecentralizedsystem,throughwhich:
TheStateshallimplementasystemofguaranteedminimumwages.Specificstandardsonminimumwagesshallbedeterminedbythepeople'sgovernmentsofprovinces,autonomousregionsormunicipalitiesdirectlyundertheCentralGovernmentandreportedtotheStateCouncilfortherecord.
1SeeAnnex1-WageStudySurveyResults.2TheLabourLawofthePeoplesRepublicofChina isavailableinitsentiretyinEnglishat:http://www.acftu.org.cn/template/10002/file.jsp?cid=56&aid=31.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
2/22
2
SpecificsaboutlegalminimumwagecalculationsarenotpublicinformationinChina,butbythetermsofthe1994law,determinationsandreadjustmentsofwagestandardsmustbemadewithreferencetothefollowing:
1. thelowestlivingexpensesoflabourersthemselvesandtheaveragefamilymemberstheysupport;
2. theaveragewagelevelofthesocietyasawhole;3. labourproductivity;4. thesituationofemployment;5. andthedifferentlevelsofeconomicdevelopmentbetweenregions.
In2003,theMinistryofLabourandSocialSecurity(MOLSS)issueditsProvisionsontheMinimumWage.Thisdocumentstatedthatprovincialgovernmentsshouldtakethecostofbasicnecessitiesforemployeesandtheirdependents,andthelocalconsumerpriceindexintoconsiderationwhendeterminingmonthlyminimumwagelevels.TheMOLSSalsosuggestedthatminimumwagesshouldbesetatabout40to60percentoflocalandregional
averagemonthlywages.Theseprovisionsarenotlaw,andminimumwagesinmostprovincesfallshortoftherecommendedlevelof40percent.Thetablebelowshowsthe2010minimummonthlywageasapercentageoftheaveragelocalwageforsevenofthelocationsthatareusedthroughoutthisreportforcomparison3.TheYangtzeRiverDeltaandthePearlRiverDeltaarekeysitesinthegarmentindustry,andwagesacrossthesetworegionsarebelowtheMOLSSthreshold.OnlyinSichuanandJiangxiProvincesareminimumwagesatleast40%ofaverageswages.Noneareanywherenear60%.Table1.ComparisonofminimumwagesasapercentageofaveragewagesacrossthreeregionsinChina.
2010MinimumMonthlyWageasaPercentageofAverageMonthlyWage
Guangdong 37%Jiangsu 37%Zhejiang 39%Shanghai 26%Chongqing 39%Sichuan 41%Jiangxi 42%*Blue=PearlRiverDelta,Yellow=YangtzeRiverDelta,Green=InteriorChina
Chineseauthoritiesconsiderthelegalminimumwagetobethesameasalivingwage,sincebasichouseholdnecessitiesandtheconsumerpriceindexaretobetakenintoaccount.Again,becausetheactualparametersandcalculationsusedinformulatingthelegalminimumarestatesecrets,thisclaimisimpossibletoassess.
3SeetheChinaWagesspreadsheetattachedwiththisreportfordetailedfiguresandinformationsources.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
3/22
3
B.RisingLabourCostsandLabourShortagesLabourcostshavebeenrisinginChinasincetheearly1990s.Thereareseveralreasonsforthis.First,intheprocessoftransitioningtoamarketeconomy,centralauthoritiesshiftedtheresponsibilityforprovidingwagesandsocialsecurityfromthestatetotheprivate
sector.Atthesametimethatthesemoveserodedthestabilityofemployment,income,andsocialbenefitsforworkers,theyalsoincreasedlabourcostsforemployers.Second,therisingcostoflivingallacrossChinaisalsoplayingacentralrole.LabourcostsforemployersarerisingindirectrelationtoincreasesintheConsumerPriceIndex(CPI)andratesofinflation.From1994to2010,theaverageinflationrateinChinawas4.25%.InNovember2010CPI,amajorgaugeofinflation,rosetoa28monthhighof5.1%yearonyear,withpricesgrowing4.9%inurbanareasand5.6%inruralareas.Foodpriceincreasesweremostdramatic,growing11.7%overthesameperiod,whilenonfoodpricesincreasedby1.9%4.Likeminimumwagecalculations,theformulasandparametersusedinCPIcalculationsarestatesecrets,andthereforearenotmadeavailabletothepublic.These
figuresshouldbeunderstoodaslowestimatesoftheactualpriceincreasesthatcausehardshipsforChinasworkersandpoorpopulations.Labourshortagesinthemanufacturingsectoringeneral,andthegarmentsectorinparticular,areanotherimportantfactorinrisinglabourcosts.Inorderattractworkerstothefactory,companiesincreasinglyneedtoofferhigherwagesandsomeemploymentbenefits.TheCSRpractitionersweinterviewedinShenzhenofferedseveralexplanationsforthisphenomenon.First,accordingtoapersonalmanageratagarmentfactory,youngworkers,especiallythoseborninthe1980s,donotwanttospendtheirliveslabouringonanassemblylineinafactory.Theyoftenarriveatthefactorydirectlyfromthecountryside,workforafewmonths,andthenleavetolookforemploymentinshops,massageparlors,
orofficesinthecity,ortotrytostarttheirownbusinesses.Manycomebackwhentheyencounterdifficultiessavingmoney.Anothermanagerstatedthatthegarmentsectorconsistentlyloosesworkerstohightechfactories,wherewagesarehigherandworkingconditionsaregenerallyabitbetter.CSRfactoriesalsostruggletokeepworkerswhofrequentlymovetononCSRworkplaceswheretheycanworkunlimitedovertimehours.Atthesametime,educationlevelsandthenumberofskilledworkersinChinaareincreasing,furtherchallengingtheabilityoffactoriestofindpeopletoworkinmanuallabourpositions.Takentogether,thesefactorshaveresultedinanoverallshiftinlabourtotheservicesector.In2008,39.6%ofChinasworkforcewasemployedinprimaryindustries(agricultureandmining),27.2%insecondaryindustries(manufacturing),and33.2%intertiaryindustries(servicesector)5.
C.GrowthoftheLegalMinimumAccordingtoregulations,theminimumwageinChinashouldbeadjustedatleastonceeverytwoyears.Increaseswerepostponedattheendof2008,however,becauseofthe
4ChinaNationalBureauofStatistics,MonthlyData:http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/statisticaldata/.5ChinaNationalBureauofStatistics,ChinaStatisticalYearbook,2009.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
4/22
4
globalfinancialcrisis.TheninFebruaryof2010,JiangsuProvince,Chinassecondlargestexporterandanimportantsiteinthegarmentindustry,wasthefirsttoannounceamonthlyminimumwageincrease.Byyearsend,27provincesandregionshadraisedminimumwagestandards,withincreasesinexcessof20%in20provinces,andmorethan30%inHainan,Sichuan,andTibet6.TheChongqingmunicipalgovernmentannouncedthat
wagestherewillincreasestartingJanuary1,2011.OnlyGansuProvince,GuizhouProvince,andtheGuangxiAutonomousRegionhavenotannouncedminimumwageincreases.Followingthewaveof2010minimumwageincreases,ShanghainowhasthehighestminimummonthlywagestandardinChinaof1,120(previously960),whileBeijinghasthehighestminimumhourlywageof11(previously9).IncreasesinthemonthlyminimumwageingarmentclusterareasoftheYangtzeRiverDelta,thePearlRiverDelta,andXiamen(SpecialEconomicZoneinSouthernChina)aresummarizedinthetablebelow.Table2.IncreasesinthemonthlyminimumwageforselectlocationsintheYangtze&PearlRiverDeltaregions,andXiamen(SEZ)inFujianProvince.
2010
MinimumWage(toptier)*
2008MinimumWage
(toptier)
RateofIncrease
2008to2010YangtzeRiverDelta
Shanghai 1120$164.22
960$140.76
17%
ZhejiangProvince 1100$161.29
960$140.76
15%
JiangsuProvince 960$140.76
850$124.63
13%
PearlRiverDelta
Guangzhou 1030$151.03
860$126.10
20%
Shenzhen 1100$161.29
1000$146.63
10%
Other
Xiamen 900$131.96
700$102.64
29%
*Provincialgovernmentsgenerallyvaryminimumwagelevelsbylocation,basedonfactorssuchascostsoflivingandlevelsofdevelopment.Thesearefiguresforthetoptierineachlocation.
6ChenXin,Chineseworkerstakehomelargerpaypackets,ChinaDaily,August19,2010,http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/201008/19/content_11173835.htm.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
5/22
5
Officialstatisticsreportwageincreasesof13.1%in2007,11.7%in2008,and12.8%in2009forurbanworkunitslinkedmostlytothestate.ANationalBureauofStatisticssurveyshowsthataverageannualsalariesintheprivatesectorrosebyonly6.6%in20097.TheimagebelowfromtheChinaDailysummarizescurrentminimumwagelevelsacross
China.SeealsotheChinaWagesspreadsheetincludedwiththisreport.
Source:ChinaDaily,August19,2010.
Despitethegrowthinlegalminimumwagesacrossthecountry,wagesasaproportionofGDPinChinahavebeensteadilydecreasingforthepast22years,peakingat56.5%in1983,butdecliningto36.7%in20058.Expertsalsowarnthatrisingwagesarenotkeeping
7InternationalLabourOrganization,GlobalWageReport2010/2011:WagePoliciesinTimesofCrisis ,Geneva,2010.8GuoQiang,Incomegapringsalarm,GlobalTimes ,May27,2010,http://china.globaltimes.cn/society/201005/535803.html.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
6/22
6
upwithrisinginflation9.ResultsfromtheWageStudysurveythatSolidaridadadministeredtoworkersinfourgarmentfactoriesinSouthernChinasupportthiswarning.Weaskedworkersiftheirwageshadincreasedoverthepastfewyears,andiftheyweresatisfiedwiththeircurrentlevelofincome.Inbothsurveylocations,thevastmajorityofworkers(82%inXiamenand88%inShenzhen)saidtheirwageshadeitherrisenslightlyorstayed
thesameoverthepastfewyears.Whenaskedtoindicatewhytheyweredissatisfiedwiththeircurrentincomelevels,80%ofworkersinXiamenand75%inShenzhenstatedthatwageswerenotenoughtokeepupwiththerapidlyrisingcostsofliving.D.WageComparisons:CoastalandInteriorChinaAveragewagesandminimumwagelevelsarehigherinChinascoastalregions,includingtheYangtzeandPearlRiverDeltaareas,thanintheinterior.Thetablebelowshowsmonthlyearningsasanaverageacrossalloccupationsin2008.Thesefiguresareforworkersovertheageof16whoareengagedingainfulemploymentinunitsofstate
ownership;collectiveownership;jointownership;shareholdingownership;foreignownership;ownershipbyentrepreneursfromHongKong,Macau,andTaiwan;governmentagencies;politicalandpartyorganizations;socialorganizations;andenterprisesandinstitutions.TheChinaStatisticalYearbooksdonotpublishdataonaverageearningsforworkersinprivateenterprisesorforselfemployedindividuals.ThisisaseverelimitationinanalyzingChinaslabourissues,giventhegrowingprevalenceofprivateemployment.Incities,onlySOEshaveahigherproportionofemployeesthanprivateenterprises10.Table2.AveragemonthlyearningsinCoastalandinteriorChina,2008. Average
MonthlyEarnings
(Chineseyuan)
AverageMonthlyEarnings
($USD)China 2,407.67 $352.82Shanghai 4,343.50 $636.50
Zhejiang 2,801.83 $410.58Guangdong 2,773.50 $406.43Jiangsu 2,608.10 $382.20Chongqing 2,220.00 $325.32
Sichuan 2,060.42 $301.94
Jiangxi 1,716.42 $251.53Source:NationalBureauofStatistics,ChinaStatisticalYearbook,2009.*Yellow=YangtzeRiverDelta,Blue=PearlRiverDelta,Green=InteriorChinaAverageearningsinChongqing,SichuanProvince,andJiangxiProvince(interiorChina)arelowerthanthoseinShanghaiandZhejiang,Guangdong,andJiangsuProvinces(coastal
9YangNing,Increasessalariescantfightinflation,ChinaDaily,December28,2010,http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/201012/28/content_11767148.htm.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
7/22
7
China,andkeylocationsinthegarmentindustry).Interiorearningsarealsolowerthanthenationalaverage.AsimilarpatternisevidentforminimumwagesbetweencoastalandinteriorChina.Thetablebelowshowsthemostrecentminimumwagelevels,comparingtherateineach
locationtothatofthecountryshighestlegalminimuminShanghai.Wagesinthefivecoastallocationsareallmorethan85%ofShanghaislevel,whilewagesintheinteriorarelessthan80%.ThelegalminimuminJiangxiProvincesthirdtieristhelowestinallofChina,andislessthanhalfoftheminimuminShanghai.Table3.MonthlyminimumwagesincoastalandinteriorChinawithcomparisonstothehighestnationalminimumwagelevelinShanghai,2010.
MonthlyMinimum
Wage2010
MonthlyMinimum
Wage2010$
%ofMonthlyMinimumWageRateinShanghai
Shanghai 1120 $164.13 100%ZhejiangProvince 1100 $161.20 98%Shenzhen 1100 $161.20 98%
Guangzhou 1030 $150.94 92%
JiangsuProvince 960 $140.68 86%Xiamen(SEZ) 900 $131.96 80%
Chongqing(Urban) 870 $127.49 78%
SichuanProvince(Chengdu) 850 $124.56 76%
Chongqing(Rural) 750 $109.91 67%SichuanProvince(Rural) 650 $95.25 58%
JiangxiProvince(Tier1) 600 $87.92 54%
JiangxiProvince(Tier3) 500 $73.27 45%Source:Various.SeeChinaWagesspreadsheet.*Yellow=coastalChina,Green=China.Companieshavealreadystartedmovingtheiroperationsinlandtotakeadvantageoflowerwagelevels.FoxconnwillmoveitsmajorproductionlinefromShenzhentoLangfanginHebeiProvince,andwillbuildanewplantinZhengzhou,thecapitalcityinHenanProvince.FoxconnisalsopartneringwithHewlettPackard(HP)toinvest$3billiontobuildamanufacturingplantforlaptopsinChongqingthatwillbeoperationalby2012.PfizerwillbuildaresearchanddevelopmentcenterinWuhaninHubeiProvince,andDellis
consideringmovingitsmanufacturingplantinthecoastalcityofXiamentothecentralorwesternregion11.WhileChinahaslongbeenconsideredthebottomintheglobalwageracetothebottom,thatbottomseemstobemovingfromcoastalcitiestotheinterior,withmajorbrandsandcompaniesfollowing.
11Editor,Risinglaborcoststriggerindustrialrelocation,ChinaDaily,July6,2010,http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/201007/06/content_10069557.htm.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
8/22
8
E.WageComparisons:ChinaandOtherAsianCountriesChinaslabourcostsarehigherthanthoseinothercountriesimportanttothegarmentindustry.Averagehourlylabourcostsareestimatedasfollows:
o Bangladesh12:US$0.27o Cambodia13: US$0.33o Pakistan14: US$0.37o Vietnam15: US$0.38o India16: US$0.43o China17: US$1.43
SeveralfactorieshaverelocatedoperationsawayfromChinainthesocalledglobalwageracetothebottom.WeinterviewedamanageratagarmentfactoryinShenzhenwhosaidthathiscorporategrouphadalreadymovedonefactorytoVietnamtotakeadvantageoflowerlabourcosts.Headdedthattheyhaveregrettedthisdecisioneversincebecause
whilelabourcostsareindeedlower,productivityandqualityhavedecreased.Inhisestimation,Chinawillcontinuetohaveanadvantageinthegarmentsectorbecauseofitswelltrainedanddisciplinedworkforce.Consistencyandquality,hesaid,areasimportantaslabourcostsinthelongrun.
12ZahidHussain,FinancingLivingWageinBangladeshsGarmentIndustry,WorldBank,August3,2010,
http://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/financinglivingwagebangladesh%E2%80%99sgarmentindustry.13EmergingTextiles,ApparelManufacturingLaborCostsin2008,May23,2008,http://www.emergingtextiles.com/?q=art&s=080523apparellaborcost&r=free.14Ibid.15Ibid.16QuamruiAhsan,StateofCotton&TextileIndustryofBangladesh:2010andBeyond,CottonBangladesh,2005,http://cottonbangladesh.com/October2007/StateOfCotton&TextileIndustry.htm17Calculatedfrom2008monthlygarmentsectorwageinChinaofUS$228.46,assuminga40hourworkweek.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
9/22
9
II.LIVINGWAGEA.MethodologiesandStudiesWorldwide,minimumwagesareofteninsufficientforworkerstosupportthemselvesand
theirfamiliesatanacceptablestandardofliving.Toaddressthisissue,thelivingwageconceptisdeployedasawaytodefineafairanddecentlevelofincomethatwouldenableworkerstomeettheirbasicneeds.Whilethereisnoagreedupondefinitionofbasicneeds,norasinglemethodologytodeterminethem,thegeneralideaisthatbasicneedsaremorethanjustphysicalsubsistence.Livingwagecampaignsalsodifferinwhetherthegoalissolelytoaddresswagelevels,orifconditionsofworksuchasthemaximumhoursinastandardworkweekshouldbeincluded.i.GeneralMethodologicalApproachesFormulationsforcalculatingalivingwagefallintooneoftwogeneralmethodological
approaches18:theBasketofGoodsApproach,ortheNationalEconomicStatisticsApproach.TheBasketofGoodsApproachismostcommonlyused.Therearetwoformulations:theFullMarketBasketApproachandtheExtrapolatedFoodBasketApproach.Inthefirstformulation,acommoditybasketofgoodsbothfoodandnonfooditemsthatapersonorfamilyneedstoconsumeinordertosatisfybasicneedsisconstructed.Thecostofthewholebasketisdetermined,andthewagelevelnecessarytobuythebasketiscalculated.Thismethodspecifiesexactlywhatgoodsarebeingused,andhowmuchtheycost.Itrequiresdetailedcollectionofpricedataforallitemsinthebasket.TheExtrapolatedFoodBasketApproachspecifiesonlyafoodbasketthatapersonorfamily
needstosatisfybasicneeds,andthenextrapolatesnonfoodcostsbasedonaveragefoodexpendituresinthecountryorlocalityunderanalysis.Pricedataarecollectedforfooditems,butnotfornonfooditems.Theassumptionhereisthattheworkeratthelivingwagelevelshouldnotberequiredtospendahigherpercentageofhis/herincomeonfoodthantheaveragepersoninthecountrydoes.ThismethodwasusedbytheUSGovernmenttoestablishthenationalpovertylinein1969,andiswidelyusedinlivingwageformulationstoday,especiallyinthedevelopingworld.TheNationalEconomicStatisticsApproachhastwoformulations,bothofwhichuseeconomicdatatoimputealivingwage,ratherthanpricedataofspecificgoods.TheUnitCostMethodisbasedontheunitlaborcostsinapparelexportindustrieswithpossible
adjustmentsforlevelofdevelopment.ItdeterminesthewagelevelthatwouldequatethelaborcostinmakinganappareliteminaparticularnationwiththatintheUnitedStates.Theincomeneedsofworkersarenotconsideredinthismethod.TheHistoricalComparisonMethodtriestodeterminewhatwagesindevelopingcountriesshouldbebycomparingthemtotheminimumwagesofwealthiercountrieswhentheywereatsimilarstagesof
18RobertC.Shelburne,TheHistoryandTheoryoftheLivingWageConcept,BackgroundReportfortheU.S.DepartmentofLabor,1999.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
10/22
10
economicdevelopment.Thismethoddoesnotconsiderworkerneeds,andisbasedonextremelyproblematicassumptions.NationalEconomicStatisticsApproachesarenotasbroadlyused.Thefollowingsectionssummarizeprevailingconceptsandmethodologiesforcalculating
livingwages.SeealsoAnnex2,whichisincludedwiththisreport.ii.InternationallyComparableLivingWageAcentralissueinlivingwagestudiesiswhetherornotstandardscanbecomparedacrosscountriesandregions.RichardAnker,workingthroughtheInternationalLabourOrganization,proposedanewmethodologyforcalculatinginternationallycomparablelivingwageestimatesin200619.Ankersmethodologyusesthepovertylineinaparticularcountryasastartingpointforcalculatingalivingwage.
Ratherthanusingofficialpovertylinefigures,thefirststepinAnkersmethodistocalculateaninternationallycomparablepovertylineforindividualcountries.Thiscalculationhasthreecomponents.First,foodcosts(FC)areestimatedbasedonestablishinganationalmodeldiet,whichislowincost,reflectsnationalfoodpreferences,andisnutritionallyacceptable.Componentsofthemodeldietinclude:
WHOrecommendationsfornutritionalrequirements,intermsofthepercentageof
caloriesfromprotein,fats,andcarbohydrates, FAOestimatesofnationalpercapitalcalorieneeds, FAOdataonnationalcereals,roots/tubers,pulses/nutsconsumption,and ILOdataonnationalfoodprices(usinglessexpensivespecificfoods).
Afterthemodeldietisestablished,officialnationalfoodpricedatafromtheILOareusedtocalculatethecostofthatdiet,addingmiscellaneousfoodcoststoarriveatatotalforarepresentativeperson.
Second,nonfoodcosts(NFC)areestimatedusingtheExtrapolatedFoodBasketApproach.ThisisbasedonEngelslaw,whichobservesthatasincomeinacountryrises,theproportionofincomespentonfoodfalls,evenifactualexpendituresonfoodrises.ToestimateNFC,foodcosts(frommodeldietcalculations)aremultipliedbythepercentageoftotalexpendituresdevotedtoessentialnonfoodexpensesforaparticularcountry,using
19RichardAnker,Livingwagesaroundtheworld:Anewmethodologyandinternationallycomparableestimates,InternationalLabourReview,2006,145,4(309338).
Povertylineistheincomenecessaryforahouseholdtoaffordalowcostnutritiousdietandnonfoodnecessitiesatlevelsconsideredacceptableinagivencountry.Livingwageisthehourlywageraterequiredtosupportahouseholdatthepovertyline.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
11/22
11
thefollowinglevels:30%forlowincomecountries,40%forlowermiddleincomecountries,50%foruppermiddleincomecountries,and75%forhighincomecountries.Third,NFCsforanaveragepersonarescaleduptothehouseholdbyusingtheCanadianequivalencescale,whichis1+.4foradditionaladultsand+.3foreachchild.
Addingfoodandnonfoodcostscalculatedforarepresentativehouseholdresultsinapovertylineestimateatthehouseholdlevel.ThenextstepinAnkersmodelistocalculatethelivingwagebasedonthisfigure.First,theestimatedpovertylineisdividedbythenumberoffulltimeworkinghoursconsideredacceptableforthecountryinquestion.Thisgivesanestimateofthehourlypayrateaworkerwouldneedinordertosupportahouseholdatthepovertyline.Next,thishourlywageisdividedbythenumberoffulltimeworkerequivalentsperhousehold.Ankercalculatesthisfigurebasedontheconceptoftheaveragecompletedfamilysizeinacountry,usingratesoffertility,mortality,andlabourforceparticipation.Finally,a10%
marginisaddedtothisfiguretoensurethatthelivingwageissustainableincaseofillness,injury,accidents,underemployment,unemployment,andotherunforeseenevents.Usingthisnewmethodology,withtheaveragecompletedfamilysizehouseholdassumption,AnkercalculatedthehourlylivingwagerateinChinausingdatafrom2000at1.38PPP$.Usingthesamedata,butwiththemoretraditionalassumptionofonefulltimeworkerforafamilyoffour,therateforChinain2000was2.08PPP$.Ankerstatesthatthesefiguresarerelativelylowforalowermiddleincomecountry,andthatChinaisuniqueinhisdataset,inthatthelivingwagefiguresignificantlydecreaseswhencountryspecificpolicychoices(abouthowtocounthouseholds)areused.
ii.AsiaFloorWageTheAsiaFloorWage(AFW)wasofficiallylaunchedin2009asaninternationalframeworktodemandastandardizedminimumlivingwageacrossAsia.ThegoaloftheAFWAllianceistocreateanAsiawidebargainingstrategythatestablishesaflooronthesocalledwageracetothebottomthatwillpreventwagecompetitionbetweenAsiancountries.TheAFWisbasedontheincomerequiredforasingleearnertosupportafamilyoffour(2adultsand2children)byworkingalegalmaximumworkingweek(butnolongerthan48hour),excludinganypaymentforovertimeorotherbonuses/allowances20.The
parametersusedintheAFWcalculationarebasicneeds(FC+NFC),thenumberofdependentstobecovered,andthelengthofworkingday/weekinvolved.TheAFWiscalculatedasfollows:
20JeroenMerk,StitchingaDecentWageacrossBorders:TheAsiaFloorWageProposal ,2009(p.8)
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
12/22
12
Step1
Dailycostofa3,000caloriefoodbasket
basedonwhatlocalpeopleeatX
3Consumption
Units=
HouseholdDailyFoodCosts(HHDFC)
Step
2 HHDFC X 30(days) =
HouseholdMonthly
FoodCosts(HHMFC)
Step
3 HHMFC X2(NFC
estimate)=
TotalMonthlyCostofHousehold
BasicNeedsTheparametersusedintheAFWcalculationwerenegotiatedamongAlliancemembers.Forfoodcosts,inordertoavoidthedifficultiesofagreeingonthespecificitemsandquantitiesthatshouldbeincludedinthefoodbasket,theAFWuses3,000caloriesperdayasanutritionalthreshold.Thisallowslocalgroupstodecidehowtofilltheirbaskets,basedon
normalworkingclassdietsinthelocality21.Fornonfoodcosts,theAFWusestheExtrapolatedFoodBasketApproach,whichinvolvesmultiplyingfoodcostsbyanonfoodmultiplierbasedonEngelsLaw.TheAFWassumesthattheratioofexpendituresforfoodandnonfoodessentialsshouldbe1:1inmostAsiancountries,or50%eachonFCandNFC.Toallowforvariationacrosslocalities,avariableof10%(plusorminus)isallowed.TheAFWdefinesahouseholdas3consumptionunits,assuminga4memberhousehold,consistingof2adults(1consumptionuniteach)and2children(.5consumptionunitseach).TheAFWmustbeearned(permonth)duringeachcountryslegalmaximum
workingweek,thoughthismustnotbeinexcessof48hoursperweek.TheabovecalculationwascarriedoutforalltheAsiancountriesintheAFWAlliance,andthenconvertedintopurchasingpowerparity(PPP).Therangeoftotalmonthlyhouseholdcostsrangedfrom417.40PPP$inBangladeshto593.60PPP$inIndonesia.FiguresusedforChinascalculationarebelow.Throughapoliticalprocessofdeliberationanddiscussion,theAllianceagreedthat475PPP$wasthemostappropriatefigureforAsiafor2009.Thisequatesto1,638.75permonthinChina. Foodbasketof
3,000caloriesfor(oneadult)
3consumptionunits/month
Foodcosts+nonfoodcosts(50%each)
ConvertedintoUS$
Foodcosts+nonfoodcostsinPPP$
China
193
579
1158
$169.60
584.70
21Inordertoavoidloweringthenutritionalstandardinanycountry,thehighestthresholdof3,000caloriesperdayasdefinedinIndonesiawasusedintheAFWcalculation.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
13/22
13
iii.BasicNeedsWageSA8000,awellknowninternationalstandardforimprovingworkingconditions,usestheconceptofabasicneedswagetoaddressthegapbetweenlegalminimumwagesandactualworkerexpendituresandneeds.Theconceptisdefinedasfollows:
Abasicneedswageenablesworkerstosupporthalftheaveragesizedfamilyabovethepovertyline,basedonlocalpricesneartheworkplace.Basicneedsincludeessentialexpensessuchasfood,cleanwater,clothes,shelter,transport,education,adiscretionaryincome,aswellaslegallymandatedsocialbenefits(whichmayincludehealthcare,medicalinsurance,unemploymentinsurance,retirementplan,andsoon)22.
Intheauditingprocess,thisstandardallowsforflexibilityinhowabasicneedswageiscalculated.Itisnotaformulationperse,butisanimportantlivingwageconcept.AkeyinsightfromtheSA8000isthat,Consultingwithworkersand/ortheirrepresentativesis
thebestwaytohaveanaccuratedeterminationofthelocalbasicneedswage(GuidanceDocumentforSA8000,p.102).iv.InternationalLabourInitiativesTheFairWearFoundationisaninternationalverificationinitiativethatworkswithcompaniesintheclothing(andsewnproducts)industrytoadvocateforimprovedlabourconditions.TheFoundationslabourstandardsincludealivingwageprovisionasfollows:
Wagesandbenefitspaidforastandardworkingweekshallmeetatleastlegalor
industryminimumstandardsandalwaysbesufficienttomeetbasicneedsofworkersandtheirfamiliesandtoprovidesomediscretionaryincome.(ILOConventions26and131).Deductionsfromwagesfordisciplinarymeasuresshallnotbepermittednorshallanydeductionsfromwagesnotprovidedforbynationallawbepermitted.Deductionsshallneverconstituteanamountthatwillleadtheemployeetoreceivelessthantheminimumwage.Employeesshallbeadequatelyandclearlyinformedaboutthespecificationsoftheirwagesincludingwageratesandpayperiod23.
TheFoundationdoesnotprovidespecificparametersorcalculationsusedinlivingwageconsiderations.
TheEthicalTradeInitiative,anallianceofcompanies,tradeunions,andvoluntaryorganizations,alsohasalivingwageprovision,whichstatesthatwagesshouldalwaysbe
22SocialAccountabilityInternational,GuidanceDocumentforSocialAccountability8000(SA8000),2004(p.100).23http://fairwear.org/
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
14/22
14
enoughtomeetbasicneedsandtoprovidesomediscretionaryincome24.TheETI,however,isnotspecificaboutwhatitmeansbyalivingwage.v.TheChinaLegalMinimum
Chinasauthoritiesintendthecountrysminimumwageasakindoflivingwage.In2010,thehighestminimumwageratewasinShanghaiat$164.10permonth,andthelowestwasintier3ofJiangxiProvinceat$73.26permonth.ThesewagesaremuchlowerthantheAFWfiguresforChinaof$261.96and$289.28permonth,calculatedusingIMFandWorldBankstatisticsrespectively.EveniflegalminimumwagesinChinawereadequatetocoverbasicneeds,therearestillproblemswithworkersactuallyreceivingthesewagelevels.Employersdontalwaysadheretotheminimumwagelaw,anddeductionssomelegitimate(socialinsuranceandtaxes)andsomeillegitimate(disciplinarypurposes)canquicklyerodeworkerstake
homepay.B.ProblemswithLivingWageConceptsandMethodologiesinGeneralAcrosslivingwagemethodologies,thereareseveralpersistentissuesandlimitationsthatneedtobeaddressed.Theseissueslargelyconcernhowparametersaredefined,andtheassumptionsuponwhichtheyarebased.Determiningwhatbasicneedsarebothfoodandnonfoodneedsisparticularlyproblematic.MostlivingwageformulationsaccountforthecostsofbasicneedsusingoneoftheBasket
ofGoodsApproachesdescribedabove.Theprocessofspecifyingwhatitemsgetincludedinthebasketandinwhatquantitiesishighlycontentious.Itraisesthequestionofwhogetstodeterminewhatcountsasbasic,andusingwhatstandards.Thisquicklybecomesapoliticalissue,sotransparencyateverystageoftheprocessisnecessary.Intermsofthefoodbasket,framersofdifferentlivingwageformulationshavetriedtoaccountforlocalandculturaleatinghabitsbybuildingflexibilityintoproposedmodels.Thisissurelyanimprovementthatmakesthelivingwageconceptmoreregionallyandlocallyspecific.Nutritionalthresholdshavealsobeenusedtoensurethatdietsarecaloricallyadequate,especiallyforworkersengagedinphysicallabour.Toimprovemodelsevenfurther,wealsoneedtotakeintoaccountthecostsassociatedwithbuyingfoodsthat
aresafeandhealthy.Livingwageformulationsneedbuiltinmechanismstoaccountforrisingfoodpricesintheshortterm,particularlyinthecontextofrecentlypast,continuing,andloomingfoodpricecrises.Inthenearfuture,modelsshouldalsoincludeprovisionsforworkerstobuyfoodsthatareorganicallyorsustainablyproduced,orotherwisecertifiedassafe.Weshouldnotconfineworkerstoastandardoflivingthatincludesonlythecheapestpossiblefoods.Thisisespeciallytrueinplaceswheretheleastexpensivefood
24http://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/keyetiresources/etibasecode
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
15/22
15
isalsothemostcaloricallydense,butnutritionallyempty(forexampleintheUnitedStates).Perhapsevenmoreimportantly,thecheapestfoodsinmanyplacesarealsothemostlikelytocarrypesticideandheavymetalresiduesandantibioticresistantdiseasecausingorganisms.Theworkingpoorshouldnotbemademoresusceptibletotheillnessesanddiseasesassociatedthesefoodsystemissues.
Incalculatingnonfoodcosts,theExtrapolatedFoodBasketApproachislimitedinthreemainways.First,bynotspecifyingactualusesofnonfooditemsandtheirassociatedcosts,thiscategoryofbasicneedsbecomesamereabstractionwithnogroundingintherealityofworkingclassexpendituresandneeds.Second,thesecalculationsdonotaccountfortheprivatecostsofpublicservices.Finally,thecalculationofnonfoodcostslimitsthesecoststowhatpeopleactuallyspend,andnottowhattheyneed.TheAFW,forexample,assumesthatfoodcostsandnonfoodcostsareeach50%oftotalexpenditures,basedonEngelsLawthatasincomerises,theproportionofincomespentonfooddecreases.However,usingexpenditurestocalculate
needmissesthefactthatmanyhouseholdssimplydowithoutthingstheyneedlikeinsurance,savings,anddiscretionaryincome.Need,inotherwords,isoftengreaterthanearnings(hencetheneedforalivingwage),andalsogreaterthanexpenditures.When40%ofacountryspopulation,forinstance,areuninsured,thatmeansthat40%ofthepopulationisnotexpendingincometopayforinsurance.Nationalaveragefiguresonthepercentofincomespentonnonfooditems,therefore,donotcapturetheproportionofapopulationthatissimplynotspendingonaparticularcategorysuchasinsurance.EngelsLaw,andtheExtrapolatedFoodBasektApproachtothelivingwage,cannotaccountforvariationandinequalityacrossapopulation.Itisbettertospecifytheactualcostsofnonfoodbasicneedsthantoassumethembasedonthesenationalmeasuresofaverageexpenditures.
C.ProblemswithLivingWageConceptsandMethodologiesinChinaAnalysesofanylabourissueinChina,includingthelivingwage,areincompletewithoutadiscussionofthelivelihooddilemmasofthecountrys200millionmigrantworkers.Livingwageconcepts,methodologies,anddemandsdontaddresstheneedsofthispopulation,andfailtocapturetherealityoftheirlivesandlivelihoods.i.ChinasArmyofMigrantWorkers
ThemassivelevelofurbanruralincomeinequalityinChinatodayisnodoubtoneofthepowerfuldriversoflabourmigration.Thecurrentratioofincomeinurbanareastothatinruralareasis3.33to1,andtheGinicoefficientexceeds0.5(0.4isconsideredawarninglevelinternationally).Atthesametimetherichest10%ofpeopleinChinaaremaking23
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
16/22
16
timesmorethanthepoorest10%25.Investmentisurbanfocused,andruralareasandruralpeoplearelargelyleftbehindinChinaseconomicmiracle.TheEastisthelargestregionofdestinationformigrantworkers,receiving70%ofthetotalin2004.Guangdong,inthePearlRiverDelta,isthelargestreceivingprovince.Therewere
about34millionemployedmigrantworkerstherein2004,makingup44%oftheprovincespopulation26.Thesenumbersarechanging,especiallyinthewakeofthereportedmigrantworkershortageinChinascoastcities.Themostrecentofficialfiguresshowthatin2009,therewere33millionmigrantworkersinthePearlRiverDelta(down22.5%from2008),and28millionintheYangtzeRiverDelta(down7.8%from2008)27.MigrantworkersarequiteliterallybuildingChinascitiesandeconomy.Theseworkersaccountfor80%ofjobsintheconstructionsector,68%inmanufacturing,and52%intheservicesector28.Theyarekeytothegarmentindustryaswell.Basedonofficialdatafrom2004,migrantworkersaremostlyyoung(45%aged1625,
16%aged2630,23%aged3140,and16%aged41andolder)andmale(2/3male,1/3female).Theirlevelsofeducationalattainmentarequitelow,with65%ofmigrantworkershavingonlycompletedlowermiddleschool,and18%withalevelofprimaryschoolorbelow29. OursampleofgarmentfactoryworkersinShenzhenandXiamenlooksabit
differentthantheseofficialfiguresfrom2004.Theaverageworkerageinoursamplewas26inShenzhenand30inXiamen,andbothsampleswerenearlyhalfandhalfmaleandfemaleworkers.FortyeightpercentofworkersinShenzhenweremarried,comparedto70%inXiamen.Wedidnotcollecteducationdata.
ThemajorityofworkersinoursamplecamefromprovincesincentralChinatoworkontheSoutherncoast.Only13%ofworkersintheShenzhenfactorysamplewerefromGuangdong,and24%intheXiamenfactorysamplewerefromFujian.ii.DiscriminationTheprimaryreasonthatlivingwageconcepts,methodologies,anddemandsdonotaddresstheneedsofmigrantworkershastodowithdiscriminationtheyfacebasedonthehukousystemofhouseholdregistration.Migrantworkers,eventhosewhohavelivedinthecitieswheretheyworkfor10ormoreyears,arestilllegallyruralresidents.Assuch,theyare
25GuoQiang,2010.26LiShi,RuralMigrantWorkersinChina:Scenario,ChallengesandPublicPolicy ,PolicyIntegrationandStatisticsDepartment,ILO,WorkingPaperNo.89,June2008.27PeoplesDaily,Ruralmigrantworkersaveragemonthlywageat1,417yuan,PeoplesDaily,March24,2010,http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6929271.html.28Figuresfor2000fromLiShi,2008.29LiShi,2008.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
17/22
17
discriminatedagainstinurbanlabourmarketsandareregardedassecondclassinurbansociety.WageDiscriminationandConditionsofWork
Thereareanumberofchallengesthataccompanythissituation.Intermsofwages,theruralurbandivideinincomeinequalityisexpressedevenwhenmigrantworkerslabourinsidethecity.A2006surveyshowedthathourlywagesformigrantworkerswereaboutonequarterofthoseforlocalurbanworkers30.Migrantworkersalsofaceincomeinsecurity,oftennotreceivingtheirwagesinduetime,andhavinginsufficientrightsprotectiontomanagewagearrearsissues.The2006StateCouncilsurveyofmigrantworkersfoundthatonly47%ofmigrantsarepaidontime31.Jobinsecurityisanotherseriouschallenge.TheCHIPS(ChineseHouseholdIncomeProjectSurvey)surveyin2002foundthatalmost98%ofruralmigrantworkershadchangedjobsatleastoncesincetheymovedtothecity,andtwothirdsofthemhadchangedjobsmore
thantwice.Anotherissueisthatonlyasmallproportionofmigrantworkershavewrittencontractswiththeiremployers,eventhoughcontractsarerequiredbythe2008LaborContractLaw32.AccordingtotheStateCouncilsstudyonmigrantworkersin2006,79%ofmigrantworkershadnosignedlabourcontracts,and15percentoftheworkerssurveyeddidntknowwhatalabourcontractwas33.Withoutwrittencontracts,migrantworkersaregenerallyinaweakpositionwhentheyhavedisputesoverwagepayment.Enforcementofthelegalmaximum40hourworkweekisquitelax,especiallyformigrantworkers.The2002CHIPSdatashowedthat80%ofmigrantworkersworkedsevendaysperweek(fiveisthelegalstandardforlocalworkers),andlessthan30%hadworkinghoursequaltoorlessthanthelegalmaximumworkingtime34.Thisrealityclearly
confoundsmanyoftheassumptionsusedinlivingwagecalculations. Inoursampleoffactoryworkers,97%orworkersinShenzhenand70%inXiamen
indicatedthattheyworked812hoursaday.AllworkersinShenzhenand83%inXiamensaidovertimeisregularlyavailable.Wewerenotallowedtoaskmorespecificquestionsaboutworkhours.WealsointerviewedaworkerinShenzhenwhoworks13hoursaday,6daysaweekinanonCSRfactory(from8amuntil10:30pm,witha1hourlunchbreakanda30minutedinnerbreak).Shetoldusthather78hourworkweekisstandardamongherpeers.
30Ibid.31ResearchOfficeProjectTeam,StateCouncil,ResearchReportonRuralMigrantWorkersinChina ,2006,ChinaYanshiPress(inChinese).32TheLaborContractLawofthePeoplesRepublicofChina isavailableinitsentiretyinEnglishat:http://www.acftu.org.cn/template/10002/file.jsp?cid=56&aid=590.33LiShi,2008.34Ibid.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
18/22
18
Beyondchallengesintermsofthelabourmarketandworkingconditions,thereisamorefundamentaldiscriminationchallenge.Thelivingwageconceptisproposedasawaytodeterminehowmuchaworkerneedstoearninordertosupporthisorherhouseholdtoliveinaparticularplaceataparticularstandardofliving.ButforChinasmigrantworkers,theissueisnotsomuchwhethertheyhaveenoughmoneytopayforbasicneeds(whichis
alsoakeyconsideration),butwhetherornottheyareallowedaccesstothosebasicneedsinthefirstplace.Becauseofthehukousystem,ruralmigrantscannotaccessthesamesocialinsurancebenefitsasurbanresidents.Theyarealsodiscriminatedagainstintermsofhousingandeducation.SocialInsuranceDiscriminationAtthesametimethatcentralauthoritiestransferredresponsibilityforsocialprotectiontotheprivatesector,theyalsolaunchedanewpublicsocialsecuritysystemforemployeeswhoworkinurbanenterprises.Socialinsuranceisthecoreofthissystem,andincludes
oldageinsurance(pensions),unemploymentinsurance,medicalinsurance,industrialinjuryinsurance,andmaternityinsurance.Institutionaldiscriminationoriginatinginthecurrentstructureofthehukousystemleavesmigrantworkersinsecure,uninsured,andunprotected.Further,policiesandtightprofitmarginsdonotcompelemployerstoprovidesocialsecuritiesformigrants.CHIPSdataindicatethatin2002,only5%ofmigrantworkerswerecoveredbyapensionscheme,lessthan2%byunemploymentinsurance,andonly3%bymedicalinsurance.AMinistryofAgriculturestudyin2005foundthat13%ofmigrantworkerswerecoveredbyoccupationalinjuryinsurance,10%bymedicalinsurance,and15%byapensionscheme.The2006StateCouncilstudyshowedthat85%ofmigrantworkershadno
protectionagainstemploymentrelatedinjuries35. WeinterviewedthepersonnelmanagerataCSRfactoryinShenzhen.Shetoldus
thatthecompanyhasagoal,basedonlocalrequirements,that100%ofitsemployeeshavemedicalcoverage.Workersaretopay102eachmonthformedicalinsurance,andthecompanypaystheremaining250.InoursurveyofworkersatthesamefactoryinShenzhen,only37%indicatedthattheyhadmedicalexpendituresofanykind.Thisseemstobeacontradictionbetweenthegoalsofthefactoryandtherealityoftheworkers.Further,weinterviewedanonCSRfactoryworkerwhosaidthathermedicalexpenseswereclosetonothing.Ifshegotsick,sheneverwenttoseeadoctorandonlyrarelyboughtmedicinebecausebothweremuchtooexpensive.
Guangdong,includingShenzhen,isuniqueinthatmigrantworkerscanusetheirmedicalcoverageforservicesinsideGuangdongProvince.Theydonothavetoreturnhomeformedicalcare.
35LiShi,2008.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
19/22
19
HousingDiscriminationAsruralresidents,migrantworkersarenotlegallyallowedtoliveincities.Thevastmajorityofmigrantsliveindormitoriesormakeshifthousingprovidedbyemployersdirectlyonsiteatthefactoryorconstructionsite.Thesefacilitiesarecrowded,andlack
basicfurniture,sanitationfacilities,andheatingandairconditioning.AccordingtoCHIPSdata,45%ofmigrantworkerslivedinhousingwithoutabathroomortoiletin2002,andthisfiguredoesnotincludethesituationindormitories.Eventhoughlivingspaceislimitedandconditionsarepoor,housingcostsstillaccountforanincreasesshareofmigranthouseholdsexpenditures.The2002surveyreportedthatrentaccountedforalmosthalfoftotalhouseholdexpendituresbecauseofrisingcostsandwagestagnation36.ThisisindirectcontradictiontotheassumptionsusedinExtrapolatedFoodBasketApproachestocalculatingnonfoodcosts. DuringaninterviewwithfourworkerrepresentativesatafactoryinShenzhen,we
learnedthatworkerdissatisfactiontherestemmedprimarilynotfromwagelevels,but
fromhousingandfoodissues.Thepersonnelmanagertoldusthat80%oftheirworkersliveinthefactorydorms,with7peopletoaroomandnobathroom.Becausethefactoryonlyhassegregatedmaleandfemaledorms,workerswhoaremarriedand/orhavefamiliesmustrentroomsoutsidethefactory.Thedifferencesincostsareconsiderable.Workerswholiveinthedormspay30permonthforrentand125permonthtoeatalloftheirmealsinthecanteen.Theaveragerentforaroomoutsidethefactoryis170200permonth,andfoodcostsarearound300permonth.Thesituationforthesetwodifferentgroupsofworkersthosewholiveinsidethefactoryandthosewholiveoutsidearemarkedlydifferent.
WeinterviewedaworkeratanonCSRfactoryinShenzhenwhopays300per
monthtorentaroomwithherhusbandwhoisalsoamigrantworker.Herpersonalfoodexpendituresare160amonth,95ofwhichshepaysherself,and65ofwhichispaidbyherfactory.Herhusbandsfoodcostsarethesame.EducationDiscriminationPublicschoolsincitiesarenotfullyopentothechildrenofmigrantworkers.Theymightbedeniedaccesscompletely,orberequiredtopaysignificantlyhigherschoolfeesthanlocalchildren.Asurveyin2001foundthattherewereabout7to8millionchildrenofruralmigrantworkersofschoolage(714yearsold)inChinascities.About16%ofthose
childrenwerenotinschool,and87%ofmigrantchildrenundertheageof7werenotinkindergarten.Thesamesurveyfoundthat67%ofmigrantchildrenpayhigherschoolfeesthanlocalchildren37.Livingwagecalculationsdonotcapturethesechallenges.
37Ibid.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
20/22
20
WeinterviewedaworkerinShenzhenwhopays7,400ayeartosendhissontoprimaryschoolthere.Publicschoolisfreetolocalchildren,butmigrantshavenochoicebuttopayhighfeesatprivateschools.
MigrantWorkersataGlanceNumberofmigrantworkers(MW)inChinain2010 120200millionUrbanruralincomeinequalityratioin2010 3.33to1
DestinationofMW 70%toEasternChina,Guangdonglargestreceivingprovince
NumberofMWintheYangtzeRiverDeltain2009 28million,7.8%lessthan2008
NumberofMWinthePearlRiverDeltain2009 33million,22.5%lessthan2008%ofalljobsheldbyMWintheconstruction,manufacturing,andservicesectorsin2004
80%,68%,52%
AverageeducationlevelofMW Lowermiddleschool
%ofMWwhowerepaidontimein2005 47%
%ofMWwithsignedlabourcontractsin2005 21%%whoknewwhatalabourcontractwasin2005 85%
%whoworked7daysaweekin2002 80%
%whoworkedwithinthelegalmaximumnumberofworkhoursin2002
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
21/22
21
householdincludedthemselves(withorwithoutaspouse),theirsiblings,andtheirparents.Theresthadhouseholdswithamixofparents,grandparents,andchildren.Thismeansthatworkersaresupportinghouseholdswithanaverageof5adults,or5consumptionunitstousetheAFWlanguage.
AnotherimportantconsiderationinChinaisthatmembersofthesamemigrantworkerhouseholdoftenliveindifferentplaces.Whileabout20%ofworkersmigratewiththeirfamilies,thevastmajoritydonot,largelybecauseofhukoubaseddiscriminations.Becausehouseholdsaresplitacrosstimeandspace,thecostofbasicneedsaredifferentinatleasttwosenses.First,costsoflivingvarybylocation.Second,migrantworkerswhocometothecityaloneorinsmallgroupsremitapercentageoftheirwagesbacktotheirruralhouseholds.Theseremittancesneedtobepartofthelivingwagecalculation. Inoursurvey,remittanceswerethelargestexpensecategoryforworkersinboth
locations,and70%ofworkersinShenzhenand69%inXiamenindicatedthathelpingtomeettheirfamiliesbasicneedswastheprimaryreasontheylefthometoworkinafactory.
III.WAGESTRUCTURESTheChinaWagesspreadsheetattachedwiththisreportdetailsthefiguresandsourcesofinformationforminimumandaverageswagesacrossthreeregionsinChina,aswellasthegarmentsectorwageandtheAsiaFloorWage.ThetablebelowsummarizeswagestructuresbasedonsecondarydataandonthedatawecollectedthroughinterviewsandsurveysinShenzhenandXiamen.Table4.WagestructuresinShenzhenandXiamen.
Shenzhen
MonthlyShenzhenAnnual
XiamenMonthly
XiamenAnnual
MinimumWage(2010)
1,100 13,200 900 10,800
GarmentSectorWage(2008)
1,559 18,708 1,559 18,708
AsiaFloorWage(2009)
1,639 19,668 1,639 19,668
AverageWagefromSolidaridadSurvey(2011)
1,659 19,908 1,790 21,480
AverageAnnualExpendituresfromSolidaridadSurvey(2011)
38 25,309
38Wedonothaveenoughdataforthisfigure.ThesurveyinstrumentweusedinShenzhenwasunclearonthisquestion.Only23%ofthesurveyrespondentsprovidedanyexpenditurefigures,andeventhisdataisnotreliableenoughtositehere.
7/31/2019 China Living Wage Study
22/22
Comparingthesenumbers,thefirstthingthatbecomesabundantlyclearisthatworkersintheCSRfactorieswestudiedaremakingmorethanthelocalminimumwage,theaveragenationalgarmentsectorwage,andtheAsiaFloorWage.AworkeratanonCSRfactoryinShenzhenmadeevenmorebecauseoftheunlimitedovertimeopportunitiesatherfactory.
Heraveragemonthlywageis2,200,paidonapiecerate.Evenatthesehigherthanexpectedwagerates,themajorityofworkersstillindicatedthattheywerehavingtroublepayingforbasicnecessitiesbecauseofrisingprices.Theotherremarkablefindinginourstudyisthataverageexpendituresarehigherthanaveragewages.Therecouldbeseveralexplanationsforthis.First,87%ofworkersintheShenzhensampleand97%inXiamenindicatedthattheirhouseholdshadanothersourceofincome(farming,specialtycrops,animalhusbandry,business,orvillagecadrepositions).Expenditurefiguresmightcombinetheseincomesources.Second,afamilymighthavetwomigrantworkerscontributingincome,forinstancebothahusbandandwife.Surveyrespondentsmayhaveindicatedtotalhouseholdexpenditures,butonlytheirindividual
wages.Whateverthecase,thissignalstheneedtocollectmoredetailedincomeandexpendituredatathatincludesinterviewingandsurveyingnotonlymigrantworkersthemselves,butalsofamiliesinmigrantshometowns.Thiskindofstudywouldalsohelpustobetterunderstandhowtoassessdifferentbasicneedsinthecityandinthecountryside.ThisinformationiskeyforcalculatinganappropriatelivingwagefigureforChina.IV.RECCOMENDATIONSInordertocalculatealivingwageinChina,anumberofissuesneedtofirstbeaddressed.
1. Interviewsshouldaccompanydeskcalculationsinordertosituatethelivingwagestudyinthelivedrealityofworkers.Ideally,interviewsshouldincludebothmigrantworkersandtheirfamilymemberslivinginotherplacesinordertoaccesscostbasicneeddifferencesinthesedifferentlocales.
2. Thedefinitionofbasicneedsshouldbedeterminedinconsultationwithworkersthemselves,notjustfromdatasetsandofficialstatistics.
3. IftheBasketofGoodsApproachisusedtodefinebasiccosts,bothfoodandnonfooditemsshouldbedeterminedbycollectingpricedatainparticularlocalities.TheExtrapolatedFoodBasketApproachshouldnotbeused.
4. Foodcostcalculationsshouldtakeintoaccountdifferentcostsassociatedwithwhetherornotworkerseatinfactorycanteens.
5. Thehouseholdparametershouldbecalculatedasanaveragehouseholdsizebasedoninterviewswithworkersinordertoappropriatelyreflectdifferenthouseholdstructures.
6. Remittancestoruralhouseholdsshouldbeincludedasabasiccost,basedoninterviews.
7. Anylivingwagefigure,oncearrivedat,shouldbecontextualizedwithincurrentlabourlaws,thewaysinwhichtheyareenforced(ornot),andtheparticularsocialcontextinChinathatincludesmigrantworkersandthemanydiscriminatorypracticestheyface.