+ All Categories
Transcript
Page 1: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Comparison

ofLM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

with LM Verification against Temps

Ulrich Pflüger, Deutscher Wetterdienst

Page 2: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Comparisonof

LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)with LM Verification against Temps

• by means of Time Series (June 2001 until May 2003) of monthly average of – bias and rmse of 00h, 24h, 48h Forecasts based on all MLAs/Temps in

LM area

– Variables are• temperature

• wind velocity

• wind direction

Page 3: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Multi Level Aircraft Measurementsare

• Several (not less than 4) single Aircraft Measurements during the climb or descent flight

• which are piecewise combined– beginning with the lowest

– next < 20 km horizontal distance of the first

– vertical distance < 55 hPa

– etc.

• and then used like a Temp Measurement

Page 4: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

LM Area

All MLAs at 12 UTC

2003/05/01-2003/05/19

Page 5: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

LM Area

All Temps Stations

12 UTC

2003/05/01-2003/05/19

Page 6: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Bias of LM-Temperatureagainst

MLA Temps

00 UTC

Page 7: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Analysis Analysis

24 h Forecast 24 h Forecast

48 h Forecast 48 h Forecast

small bias, similar structures in both cases

Forecasts have annual cycle, in upper and middle tropospherepositive bias in Summer, negative in Winter, near ground predominantly negativ bias

Page 8: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

RMSE of LM-Temperatureagainst

MLA Temps

00 UTC

Page 9: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

1.41.6

1.61.4

2.22.01.8 2.0

similar structures in both cases

0.8 0.8

similar structures in both cases, rmse(Temps) overall about 0.2 K greater than rmse(MLA)

Page 10: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Bias of LM-Temperatureagainst

MLA Temps

12 UTC

Page 11: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Negative bias> -0.3 K

positiv bias< 0.4 K

below 800 hPApredominantly negativ,

below 800 hPApredominantly negativ

below 800 hPASummer negativ,Winter positiv

below 800 hPASummer negativ,Winter positiv

Page 12: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

RMSE of LM-Temperatureagainst

MLA Temps

12 UTC

Page 13: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

1.41.6

1.61.4

2.22.01.6 1.8

Same as 00 UTC

Page 14: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Differences at Temperature Verification

• Relative few differences between Verification based on MLAs and Temps

• When bias is small there is predominantly a negative bias against MLAs and a positive bias against Temps

• Overall rmse of 24/48 h Forecast is about 0.2 K greater in Verification based on Temps

Page 15: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Bias of LM-Wind Velocityagainst

MLA Temps

00 UTC

Page 16: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Below 800 hPa, annual cycle, in winter strong positive bias Max.: 1.4 m/s

Below 800 hPa , annual cycle, in winter strong positive bias Max.: 1.8 m/s

Below 800 hPa , annual cycle, in winter strong positive bias Max.: 1.8 m/s

Below 900 hPa predominantly negative bias Min.: -1.1 m/s, Winter less

Below 900 hPa predominantly negative bias Min.: -0.8 m/s, Winter partly positive Max 0.2 m/s

Below 900 hPa predominantly negative bias Min.: -0.8 m/s, Winter partly positiv Max 0.2 m/s

Page 17: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

RMSE of LM-Wind Velocityagainst

MLA Temps

00 UTC

Page 18: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Overall rmse(MLA) is about 0.5-1 m/sgreater than rmse(Temps)

Overall rmse(MLA) is equalto rmse(Temps)

Above 400 hPa rmse(Temps) is greaterthan rmse(MLA)

3.5 3 3.5 3

Page 19: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Bias of LM-Wind Velocityagainst

MLA Temps

12 UTC

Page 20: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Below 800 hPa, annual cycle, in winter strong positive bias, Max.: 1.9 m/s

Below 800 hPa , annual cycle, in winter strong positive bias, Max.: 2.4 m/s

Below 800 hPa , annual cycle, in winter strong positive bias, Max.: 2.3 m/s

Below 900 hPa predominantly negative bias Min.: -1.1 m/s,Winter partly positive, Max.: 0.2 m/s

Below 800 hPa Summer negative bias Min.: -0.6 m/s, Winter positive, Max 0.7 m/s

Below 800 hPa Summer predominantly negative bias Min.: -0.6 m/s, Winter predominantly positive, Max 0.8 m/s

Page 21: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

RMSE of LM-Wind Velocityagainst

MLA Temps

12 UTC

Page 22: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

3 2

4 3 4 3

Same as 00 UTC

Page 23: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Differences at Wind Velocity Verification

• bias with annual cycle– below 800 hPa

• positive against MLA

• negativ(Winter) to slight positive(Summer) 00 UTC

• negativ(Winter) to positive(Summer) 12 UTC

• rmse with annual cycle – at Analysis overall 0.5 -1 m/s higher against MLA

(wind is nudged to Temps)

– at Forecasts higher rmse against Temps above 400 hPa

Page 24: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Bias of LM-Wind Directionagainst

MLA Temps

00 UTC

Page 25: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Below 800 hPa, strong positive bias Max.: 7.4 degree, smaller in spring and autumn

Below 800 hPa, strong positive bias Max.: 10.3 degree

Below 800 hPa, strong positive bias Max.: 13.5 degree

Below 900 hPa negative bias Min.: -4.9 degree, Winter less

Below 900 hPa predominantly negative bias Min.: -7 degrees, Winter partly positive Max.: 6 degrees

Below 900 hPa predominantly negative bias Min.: -10 degrees, Winter partly positiv Max 6 degrees

Page 26: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

RMSE of LM-Wind Directionagainst

MLA Temps

00 UTC

Page 27: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

20

30 30

40 40

10

Overall rmse(MLA) is about 5-10 degreesgreater than rmse(Temps)

Overall rmse(MLA) is equalto rmse(Temps), except Summer

Above 400 hPa rmse(Temps) is partly greater than rmse(MLA)

Page 28: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Bias of LM-Wind Directionagainst

MLA Temps

12 UTC

Page 29: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Below 800 hPa, strong positive bias Max.: 6.1 degree, smaller as 00 UTC

Below 800 hPa, strong positive bias Max.: 10.1 degree

Below 800 hPa, strong positive bias Max.: 10.6 degree, smaller than 00 UTC

Below 900 hPa Winter negative bias Min.: -4.1 degree, Summer positive

Below 900 hPa predominantly positive Max.: 8 degrees, Winter smaller or negative

Below 900 hPa predominantly positive, Max.: 9 degrees, single months in winter positive

Page 30: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

RMSE of LM-Wind Directionagainst

MLA Temps

12 UTC

Page 31: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Overall rmse(MLA) is about 5-10 degreesgreater than rmse(Temps)

Below 400 hPa rmse(MLA) is equalto rmse(Temps) except Summer

Above 400 hPa rmse(Temps) is partly greater than rmse(MLA)

Page 32: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Differences at Wind Direction Verification

• bias with annual cycle– below 800 hPa

• Analysis and Forecast against MLAS strong positive

• Analysis against Temps slight negative below 900 hPa, slight positve above against Temps

• Forecasts against Temps partly slight negativ(Winter) to slight positive(Summer) 12 UTC

• rmse with annual cycle – at Analysis overall 5 -10 degrees higher against MLA (wind is

nudged to Temps)– at Forecasts higher rmse against Temps above 400 hPa– at Forecasts higher rmse against MLA in Summer

Page 33: Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs)

Summary

• Temperature Verification shows only few differences between the two measuring systems

• Wind Verification shows below 800 hPa great differences between the two measuring systems

• Regarding the Wind Verification results up to now (Synop, Temp) LM is more likely to underestimate wind velocity

• Regarding the verification against aircraft measurements it seems that aircraft measurements below 800 hPa underestimate wind velocity (up to 2 m/s in the boundary layer).


Top Related