eCall standards update
David Williams, Qualcomm
Contents
• Completed standardisation work in ETSI/3GPP
• Completed standardisation work in CEN
• Field trial results
• Future work in CEN
• Future work in ETSI/3GPP
Completed standardisation in 3GPP • eCall standardisation in 3GPP Release 8 was completed in December 2009 (SA#46). • Service requirements were done in SA1.
– ETSI TS 122 101 clause 10.7 and A.27
• Layer 3 protocol changes were done in CT1. – ETSI TS 124 008 clause 10.5.4.33 (eCall flag) and clause 4 (inactive substate) – ETSI TS 127 007 clause 6.27 (CECALL command)
• USIM aspects were done in CT6 – ETSI TS 131 102 clauses 4 and 5 (service number 89)
• In-band modem was done in SA4 – ETSI TS 126 267 in band modem description – ETSI TS 126 268 in band modem ANSI-C code – ETSI TS 126 269 in band modem test specification – ETSI TR 126 969 in band modem characterisation report
• UTRAN protocol testing was done in RAN5 – ETSI TS 134 123 clause 13.3.1 – Early implementation of eCall in Release 7 is certifiable.
• GERAN protocol testing was done in GERAN3 – ETSI TS 151 010 clause 26.9.6
Completed standardisation in CEN • EN15722 Minimum Set of Data
– Defines the 160 bytes that comprise the MSD
• EN16072 High Level Application protocol – Defines the procedures and processes required to provide the eCall service
using a TS12 emergency call over a mobile communications network.
• EN16072 Pan European Operating Requirements – Defines the general operating requirements and intrinsic
• EN16102 Third Party Services Supported eCall – Defines transfer of an emergency message and establishment of a voice call
between a vehicle and a 'Third Party Service Provider' (TPSP)
– Defines the transfer of data from a TPSP to the most appropriate PSAP
• TR0278316 eCall end to end conformance testing – Demonstrates conformance with EN16062 and EN16072
– Default to PE eCall in the event of TPS eCall failure
– Due to be published in late 2012. Resolution meeting will be in September.
Availability of ETSI and CEN standards
• CEN standards are purchased from a National Standards Organisation www.cen.eu
• ETSI standards can be downloaded free of charge (registration is required) http://pda.etsi.org/pda/queryform.asp
eCall Drive Tests • 48 Networks in 15 countries
– 22 stationary locations
– 12 mobility routes
– >16000 calls
– >25000 MSD transmissions
– February 2012
– International roaming calls to test PSAP in Nuremberg
IVS/TCU
with
QSC669
5
PSAP
remote
desktop
IVS Control
via QXDM
eCall-enabled
PSAP
demonstrator
Internet
Public
Network
Mobile
Network
located in Nuremberg,
Germany
Conclusions of Drive Test • Extensive drive tests carried out to investigate performance of eCall in-
band modem • Good overall performance, even in the presence of network echo
cancellers • Excellent success rate for the case of disabled NECs: >98% • Only a small number of 3-4 problematic networks
– not necessary to use disabler tone everywhere
• Further performance optimization by parameter adaptations: >99% • Detailed failure analysis required:
– implementation bugs at IVS and PSAP – abnormal network behavior – call setup and retention performance – ‘real’ modem transmission failures
• Half-Duplex unlikely to achieve overall performance improvement
Future work in ETSI/3G • A New Work Item was agreed at ETSI MSG#29 (29 March) on
“Migration of eCall Transport” – Assessment of in-band modem solution in case of no use of Circuit Switched
bearers
– Study the adaptation of IMS emergency call and IMS Multimedia Emergency Service for supporting current and future service required by eCall
– Hybrid CS/IMS solution (scenarios for PSAPs and IVS implementations)
– Migration recommendations (how and when to migrate from CS to IMS only)
• Request for ETSI STF funding under the EC 2009-2013 ICT Standardisation Work Program
• Call for experts expected in Q3 (subject to funding approval)
• Technical Report scheduled for publication end of Q1/13
Future work in CEN
• Possible extension of MSD standard, e.g. – Accelerometer, car doors open, seat belts
• Discussions on motorcycle eCall
• Discussions on personal eCall
• Amendment to HLAP using results obtained in HeERO, e.g. – Mapping of AL-ACK bits
– Introduce the echo canceller tone procedure
– Change 2s timeout value to 5s to allow a 2.1kHz echo canceller tone to be sent
– Add PULL mode (beside PUSH) as option for the PSAP to start the transmission
• Possible work on eCall for LTE
SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES
List of ETSI and CEN Standards
Title Number Latest Version (as of 1st April 2012)
eCall requirements for data transmission 3GPP TS 22.101
ETSI TS 122 101
12.0.0
eCall Discriminator Table 10.5.135d 3GPP TS 24.008
ETSI TS 124 008
11.2.1
eCall Data Transfer; In-band modem solution;
General Description
3GPP TS 26.267
ETSI TS 126 267
11.0.0
eCall Data Transfer; In-band modem solution;
ANSI-C Reference Code
3GPP TS 26.268
ETSI TS 126 268
10.0.0
eCall Data Transfer; In-band modem solution;
Conformance Testing
3GPP TS 26.269
ETSI TS 126 269
10.0.0
eCall Data Transfer; in-band modem solution;
Characterisation Report
3GPP TS 26.969
ETSI TS 126 969
10.0.0
eCall minimum set of data CEN EN 15722
Pan European eCall Operating Requirements CEN EN 16072
High Level Application Protocols CEN EN 16062
Data registry procedures ISO/EN 24978:2009
STF399 Deliverables
• ETSI TS 102 936 -1 eCall Network Access Device (NAD) conformance specification, Part 1: Protocol test specification” – Contains normative references to tests which are used to show compliance
of an eCall terminal with eCall features in 3GPP specifications.
• ETSI TS 102 936-2 eCall Network Access Device (NAD) conformance
specification, Part 2: Test Suites – Contains the TTCN code.
• ETSI TR102 937 eCall communications equipment ; Conformance to R&TTE Directive, EC Regulations for eCall and EC Vehicle regulations. – Describes how compliance with the R&TTE Directive is achieved. – Describes the EU Commission intentions for deploying eCall (note the text is
about 12 months old and superseded) – Describes an analysis of UNECE (motor vehicle) regulations and their
applicability to eCall
List of UTRAN eCall test cases
Clause Title
13.3.1.2 Test eCall using eCall capable MS with “eCall only” subscription on USIM
13.3.1.3 Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with ’eCall only’ subscription on USIM
13.3.1.4 Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with eCall capable USIM
13.3.1.5 eCall after T3242 expires
13.3.1.6 Automatically initiated eCall
13.3.1.7 Reconfiguration Call using eCall capable MS with ‘eCall only’ subscription on USIM
A supplementary test on T3243 was added
List of GERAN eCall tests Clause Title
26.9.6a.1.2 Test Call using eCall capable MS with ’eCall only’ subscription on USIM
26.9.6a.1.3 Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with ’eCall only’ subscription on USIM
26.9.6a.1.4 Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with eCall capable USIM
26.9.6a.1.5 eCall after T3242 expires
26.9.6a.1.6 Automatically initiated eCall
26.9.6a.1.7 Reconfiguration Call using eCall capable MS with ‘eCall only’ subscription on USIM
It is intended to add a test on T3243
Contents/format of the MSD
Block No.
Name Description
1 Format version MSD format version set to 1 to discriminate from later MSD formats
2 Message Identifier
incremented with every retransmission
3 Control Automatic or manual activation, position trust indicator, vehicle class
4 Vehicle ID VIN number according to ISO 3779
5 Fuel type Gasoline, diesel, etc
6 Time stamp Timestamp of incident event
7 Vehicle Location
Position latitude/longitude (ISO 6709)
8 Vehicle direction 2°degrees steps
Mandatory parts
Contents/format of the MSD
Block No.
Name Description
9 Recent Vehicle Location n-1
Latitude/longitude Data
10 Recent Vehicle Location n-2
Latitude/longitude Data
11 No. of passengers
Minimum known number of fastened seatbelts omitted if no information is available
12 Optional additional data
e.g. passenger data
Optional parts
HLAP, send MSD, lower layers
HLAP, send MSD, higher layers
TPS ecall system
eCall for HGV
The following expansion of the MSD in EN 15722 is for HGVs: • Truck type (suited for dangerous goods =true, standard goods = false) • If truck type = true
– Dangerous goods present/not present (false, true) – Coding protocol (1 byte) – if coding protocol = 1
• Phone number of Truck Operator • For 6 goods (the most dangerous first if a truck has more than 6
goods, or zero-padded for trucks with less than 6) : – UN number – Quantities – Package group
– if coding protocol = 2 • IPv6 address information endpoint • Password (8 characters)
HeERO Standardisation Task Force
• Discusses results of European HeERO eCall trials • Analyses real-world performance of eCall system • Develops proposals for standards changes • Currently discussed change requests:
– Consistency of terminology between CEN and 3GPP standards – Introduce option in CEN HLAP for PSAP to employ an NEC disabler tone
according to ITU standards, if required – Relaxed PUSH timeout value (2s 5s) – Introduce new timer for PULL (START) messages, allow PULL mode as
alternative to PUSH mode – Specify exact number of HL-ACK messages to be transmitted by PSAP – Clarification on HL-ACK message contents, bit mapping, and
procedures – Optimized setting of uplink synch tracking parameters as result of field
testing
• Stationary tests
1. Single MSD transmission per call (PUSH mode = “D1S”)
• Repeated 20x with toggling disabler tone every other call
• New call started after CLEARDOWN or expired call duration timer (30s)
2. Multiple MSD transmissions per call (PUSH-PULL-PULL mode = “PPP”)
• Repeated 100x with toggling disabler tone every other call
• New call started after CLEARDOWN by last PULL or expired call duration timer (80s)
3. Half-Duplex emulation using fixed PCM TX data for PSAP and IVS per call (“HD”)
• Repeated 50x without disabler tone every 45s
• Mobility tests
– Drive routes cover different morphologies including urban and rural areas
– Test type per route and network:
• Single MSD transmissions per call
– Repeated 100-200 times with toggling disabler tone every other call
– New call started after CLEARDOWN or expired call duration timer (30s)
Test Scenarios [Backup?]
UL sync
MSD RV 0 MSD RV 1, ...
Uplink: IVS Tx
Downlink: IVS Rx
5 x START 3 x NACK
time [seconds]
PC
M le
ve
l
ACK
IVS initiation (up to 5 x SEND)
3GPP ‘Figure of Merit’
(FoM): >≈ 1.4s, here 1.7s
Overhead for
IVS initiated signalling:
0.8 – 2.0s, here 1.4s
MSD Transmission Time:
here 2.9s
5 x HL-ACK
Total time for acknowledgements:
>≈ 2.0s, here 2.7s
HLACK
received
MSD
received Δ ≈ 1.2s
Test Sample: eCall Signals and Timings
MSD Transmission Performance
subtract approx. 1.2s for 3GPP Figure of Merit
• Mean: 4.0s, STD: 2.2s
• Transmission Success Rate:
• including non-modem related failures
– 95.57% overall
– 93.87% without T>20s
• excluding non-modem related failures
– 97.53% overall
– 95.88% without T>20s
• Includes stationary & mobility tests
• 50% of calls used NEC disabler tone