8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
1/13
Measuring Poverty
Angus Deaton
1
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
2/13
d o j 3 ¡ q i s s o d s i j i j n g - E i s s u o p u j u i s u j s q o s j e j i u i i s e s i 3 J 3 q i p s z i p i s q n s s a i s d s j o q M ‘ s p j o q s s n o q ] e j h j j o j s s j o o d X j s a s q j
u n o a [ E D O ] U O S S i p j ‘ U I E j S o j d p o o j ( J S J I J U E ^ J S E ^ ) E X E p o X j U y
u o ‘ E i p u j u ¡ - s j j o j j s j s i p j X j J S A o d j o j j E d s e p s s n s q s s i u i j s u i o s
u i q ^ n g - u i s q j j j o d d n s o j s u o s 3 A E q o j j o u q S n o u s s j e u i i j j o j S M o p r n u E i p u j s e q D n s ‘ s u o i j e d o | D y p s d s u i s d n o j S s j q E J s u j n A s j e s j s q x ' X j j s p p s j e j o X j y i q E S i p u i j s j - S u o j e u j o j j j s j j n s
s s n E D s q > ] j o m j o u u e d o q M S [ d o s d u s j j o s j e j o o d s q x s s u a s
s j j n s s j s q j j n q ‘ s j o q q S i s u j p q j u j o j j s j s s s e s u j o s [ e s d u o d s ( d o s d
E J S | U I s u j o s s j e s j s q j j q n o p o f v j - u o i j E D y i j u s p i s q j S u o j e u j u i
A E q s j s S e ¡ [ ] a ‘ s s s e d j s o u j u i p u E ‘ j o o d s i o q M p u E ‘ j j o | p M o s j o u M s i o q M X e s o j s j s S e i j i a s q j > j s e o j u o u j u j o d s i j i s j s q M s s a i ]
A I J 3 E ¡ E j n j j n D i j g E s j i ‘ A [ d d n s j s j e m s q j ‘ [ o o q D S s q j ‘ s s s n o q s j i j i a s q j j n o q s j n o p u y p u E S D E [ d S u u s q j E § j e d o j s q j j e s j 3 S e [ ] i a
j s j 8 p u n
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
3/13
Measuring Poverty
Yet even the po ore st buy thing s othe r than foo d— clothing and h
obviously— as well as an increasing n um be r of goods tha t ar
classified as necessities. For example, the average household spent 70% of its budget on food in 1983, but only 62% in 1
which time 31% of households owned a radio and 19% a t
people becom e bette r off, and even while they are still poor b
dards, they spend a sm aller fraction o f their budgets on food—
lenown as Engel’s Law, after E rns t Engel, who first no ted it in economic gro w th m akes it increasingly difficult to think of po
in terms of food, certainly in rich countries such as the United
in 2001 the typical household spent only 13.5% of its budget
also increasingly in po or cou ntries tha t are becom ing less poor,
Even so, the rhetorical link between hunger and poverty re
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
4/13
s j a j j i p j E q j j d e j s q j j o j s p s u i s q o s j e j s n u i 3 d u e m o [ ] e 3 i u o §
O J S u i s s s j p M O p U L W X [ J J E d J S E 3 | J E S E M 3 D U 3 I D S 3 q j j E q j O S ‘ X E p
I U l U i p E 3 q j X q 3 S n U I X p E 3 J [ E 3 n | E A E O J 3 S O p S E M 3 U I [ X j J 3 A o d
s o j j s p j o u i ^ p s j s n í p E ^ s e m U E | d p o o j s q j ‘ s j u n o D D E s u j o s
q S n o q x ) ' p o o j u s q j j s q j o s p o o S j o j m o [ ] e o j 3 3 j q j X q p s q d i j
q D i q M ‘ s j n j j n D u S y j o j u s u i j J E d s Q s q j X q p a p u a u i i u o D S J U E | d u e u i o j j j n q u i j o u s i j o j e d e u j o j j j o u S u i j j e j s X q j a s s e m 3 U i |
J E J S P 3 J I U Q 3 q j U [ p o q j s u i 3 1 J 0 J E D 3 q j J O S J U E I J E A 3 J E 3 J 3 q X
j o o d u o u s e 3 J 0 U J q j i M a j d o s d
a y i s s E p 3 J E j u n o u i E s i q j U E q j s s s j q j i M s p ] o q 3 s n o q u i 9 u i a i [ 3 ] d
A O d 3 J n j i p U 3 d x 3 J O 3 U J O D U I 3 q j S 3 U J O D 3 q q D i q M ‘ S D C E J E J U O Z I J O q S u i p u o d s s j J O D s q j o j p s D E J j U 3 q j s i s p c E [ e d i j j 3 a s q j u o j u i o d
3 l Í X ' S O T E J E D I J J 3 A 3 q j U O p A 3 [ 3 J Ü J i p U 3 d X 3 J O 3 U I O D U I j E q j J E s s i j o j e d s S e j s a e s q j p u E s i x e p j u o z u o q s q j S u o { E s j n j i p u s d
J S J 3 p U f l 9
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
5/13
Measuring Poverty
the nu m be r o f peo ple d esignated as po or, which, in the absenc
changes, would trigger additional progressive redistribution.
There are similar problems in adapting poverty lines over as over time. Urban people are typically more sedentary than
and so consume fewer calories at the same level of income. S
calorie standard is used for both urban and rural sectors, the
line will be higher. This sometimes leads to higher calculated
in cities than in the countryside, even when levels of living arlower in the latter and, indeed, when people are willingly mig
cities. Higher urban poverty lines make some sense because ur
usually higher, but once again the politics of “urban bias” oft
genial to overstate the number of poor people in the cities to ju
to groups w ho are vocal a nd wh o live close to the seats o
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
6/13
q X j j a A O d a q j M o p q a j d o s d j o u o i j d e j j s q j X q p a S p n i s i p j O D a j M j u a u i u j a A o S X u e o j u a d o s i o i j d e j
s i q j ^ - j u n o D X j j a A O d
a q j o j
u s a o p j a q j o u j i q u i o j j X e m e X s u o u j S u d j e j ‘ j o o d s i a u o a u i o s
X j 3 a a q j u i o j j a u i O D u a A 3 p j n o D X s u o u j s i q x X j j a A O d j o j n o S n o u s j s n i ' s u q a q j M O ] a q j s n i a s o q j o j X a u o i u j o s j u n o u J E [ j e u j s o p p j n o D ‘ X j j a A o d S u p n p a j s q o j u a a s a q o j u a a ^ j s i j o ‘ p j E p
a j X j j a A o d e o j p | 3 q S u p q s i j n q X j j a A o d j n o q E [ j e j e j o u S 3 j e 3
A 0 S y o s S u i o p j o u j o j j u s u i n S j E p o o â J s q j o u E s i a j a q x • X p u a j a j j i p o s a j d o a d j e j i u i i s q o n s j E a j j o j a s u s s o u
S u p q o j a s o p s i s u o i j i p u o D q 3 i q M j o j a q j p u ‘ a u i o D u i s . u o s j s d X p s p a j d p j n o D s m j i u s a s p u E ‘ X p s n s j d 3 u q X j j S A o d a q j j a s
a A g ¿ s a D i A a p u m o j a q j o s i q o j y a j X p j E S a q u e d p u E d j a q o u x i s X q j o a a u a d x i s X q j a q j a q M ‘ j i a A o q s j s n i s i o q M a u o a u j o s
e j s j a p u f | 8
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
7/13
Measuring Poverty
POVERTY AND GRO WTH
W hen th ere is eco no m ic grow th, in the sense of an increase insumption and average income, what happens to poverty depe
happens to the distribution of incom e an d consum ption. If e
comes grow together, then growth at the mean goes straight
reduction. If economic growth benefits only the rich, the d
income widens, and there will be no reduction in poverty in spithat growth among the rich means that average incomes are g
sometimes argued that income distribution changes only very sl
at least in the short run, growth automatically reduces poverty.
argument, it is possible to measure poverty from data on averag
expenditures; with the distribution fixed, incomes at the bottomi h
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
8/13pqj/jjjqj * X j 3 I D O S U I 3 [ O J j [ n j E J O ‘ U O I J E d p i J J s d J E D I J I J o d ‘ U O I J E D n p S O J
S u p q S E j p M s e ‘ ( X j j 3 A o d q j [ E 3 q ) X q j j E s q u n S u p q j o ( X j J S A o d
j p q s j o ‘ p s q j o p ' p s j X [ 3 j E n b a p E S u i a q 3 J n s u 3 o j s u i o d u i q S n o u s
s p n p u i s i q x ' S 3 A q s u o q D i q M u i X j s i d o s s q j u i S u i u o i j D u n j
D E O J p 3 p 3 3 U 3 J E j E q j S 3 I J I ¡ i q E d E 3 D I S E q 3 q j J O 3 J O U J J O 3 U O J O
í X j J S A o d j E q j s s n S j E 3 ^ { s u i o d u i j o X o E n b a p E U i U E q j X j p E O j q
O J S p 3 3 U X j J S A o d j E q j 8 u i 8 j n 3 D I O A J U E J J O d u i I U E U 3 3 q S E q S ( U 3 C J
X J U 3 D 3 J u ¡ \ X j 3 p o s J 3 q j O 3 U I O S U I j u s n y j n s 3 q p j n O M S 3 U 1 0 D U I
3 A q X s q j q o i q M u i X j s p o s s q j u i — c p q q n d u t j E s d d E o j p i E j j E
q j i u i ç u j E p y u i — X j j n j 3 j E d p i j j E d o j s 3 D j n o s 3 j s q j : > p E j X s q j j i U T J o o d O S J E 3 J E 3 j d 0 3 j 3 J E J 3 J T ] 3 q j O J X | U O U 3 d o 3 J E j E q j S 3 I J I
D T j J E d o j p u E p E 3 J o j 3 [ q E 3 u p q J O U J O X j J S A O d 3 q j ‘ X j J 3 A 0 d J O
s X 3 D U 3 U 3 d x 3 ( O o q D S o j o § o j X j i u n j j o d d o s q j p s i u s p s j e o q / A
e j s j a p u n 0 1
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
9/13
Measuring Poverty
income growth. There were great successes in income growth
reduction in India in the 1990s, as there had been in the 19
reduction in infant mortality rates in India was less rapid in thin the 1980s, with the opposite true for education, where scho
rose rapidly, especially among girls. More generally, the rate
child mortality throughout the poor world was slower in the
the 1980s, in spite o f high er rates o f grow th o f GDP per capi
true that income growth is often a powerful agent for the reduincome poverty, it is neither necessary nor sufficient as we can
fact that health and educational poverty have been effectively
some poor places. Costa Rica, Cuba, China prior to the econo
a n d the Indian state of Kerala are the most often cited exampl
some cases, public provision can reduce poverty even at low i
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
10/13|jjqj J 0 J P U E s u o i j e z i u e S j o [ e u o i j e u j s j u i s q j j o j X j u i e u j ( n j s s n
U I E 3 A E q 3 M ‘ p E S J S U J ‘ X j J S A O d J O U O l J I U y s p | n j 3 S n E S I J E q M U O
D I j q o d J O J J O S 3 U I O S O J 3 1 U O D O J J S A S ] ( E U O I J E U 3 q j J E J S I X 3 j e q j
s q j í ( d e | s m ‘ s s p q o d X j J S A o d i j u E u i j i s s n p u E s u q X j J 3 A o d e j s s
j n E [ E D i j q o d p | j O M o u s i s j s q j s s n E D s q ‘ j E j n o i j j E d u ¡ - j j o j j s s q j i j E q j 3 n S j E s | d o s d s u j o s j E q j o s q s n u i o s ‘ j j n s q j i p X p i u s j j x s
s e p p O M s q j j o [ 3 a s | s q j j e p u s í s j q E s S E U E U i j n q p j s q s i j i
s q j J E í p j E A U O J j q S l E J J S S I J S A 3 | [ E D O ] S q j J E X j J S A O d S U I J U S E S ^ M
a i y O M 3 H 1 N I A l H 3 A O d D N m n S V 3 l A J
• S U O I J E N u s > ] U E g p | J O j V \ s q ) A q p s s n X E p j s d u o s j s d J s d i $ j o s u q
j s j s p u f |
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
11/13
Measuring Poverty
In particular, market exchange rates make the poor countri
poor relative to the rich ones, com pared with th e real differ
living standards. (For the same reason, it is a serious mistakmeasures o f world inequ ality using official exchange rates.) T
that (to simplify matters a little) market exchange rates are
supply and d em and of im po rts and exports; im po rters into Ind
and euros, which are supplied by exporters selling Indian good
market. The market exchange rate then ensures that goods thinto and out of India have prices in rupees that, when con
market exchange rate, are comparable with the world prices o
in dollars. But many goods that are important to poor peo
much of their food, all of their housing, and the services that
neither imported nor exported. Land, housing, and services tI di l b ( b th t I di i ) ld b t b jp
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
12/13jqjqj[jjjqqjjjjj
o 3 q j u o p a s E q s j u n o D X j j a A o d o j u i 3 u o u o p s s E q s j u n o D X y s A o d
X e M p J E M J O J j q S l B J J S O U S I 3 J 3 q j L ' S 3 j n j i p u 3 d x 3 U O E J B p J 3 3 [ | 0 3
E ‘ U E J S t i j E J ‘ E i p U J S E q D n S ‘ S J S q j O 3 [ i q M ‘ S 3 U I O D U I U O E J E p J D 3 f [ O D
D U 3 U J V U I J E ^ J O J S O U I S E q 3 n S ‘ S 3 I J J U n O D 3 U I O S ‘ 3 | d u i E X 3 J O J
O S J 3 3 J J 3 3 8 j e ¡ 3 A E q U E D - - -
S S I J J U n O D S S O J D E U J J O J I U n U i o y J B J 3 J E E 3 J E s u o q s a n b s q j M o q j o s j i E j s p ‘ p s j D n p u o o [ p M s j b s X a A j n s
A 3 p u y - s s e d s q j s X e m j e j o u s i j E q j j n g - j j s d x s p u E p a D u a u
u o q j n B j e d i j s i j e j s a q j ‘ p a d o p A a p j s j y s e m X 8 o [ o p o q j a u i X a A J n s
M ‘ E i p u j s e q o n s ‘ s a u j u n o D a u i o s u ¡ s X a A j n s a s a q j j o X j t j E n b
U E A j o p a p p o o S e s i a i a q x s a j n j i p u a d x a p u s s a u i o o u i J i a q j n b p a ^ j s E p u s p a j i s i A s i X j j u n o D q 3 E a u i s p j o q a s n o q j o a j d u i B S
q M i n ‘ s / ú / u m p ¡ o i { 3 s n o i i u i o j j s a u i o D u o i j E [ n D ¡ B D j E q j j o j u o i j e u i u i j X j j a A o d p u o i j E U j a j u i a q j j o u o i s j a A ¡ e d o ( a q j U E q j s s a [ s i
e j s i a p u n
8/17/2019 Deaton_ Measuring Poverty
13/13
Measuring Poverty
Africa, in the transition cou ntries o f Eastern Europe and the
Union, and most recently in some countries in Latin Amer
weight o f po pu lation in India and Ch ina do m inates in the While it would be true to say that, apart from those two coun
in the world is getting worse, it is also true tha t nearly ha
population lives in places where poverty is falling. O n the negat
is no progress or even negative progress in Africa, with incr
poverty accom panied by falling life expectancy associated w i
While few people would attribute the AIDS catastrophe to
economic globalization, we must likewise be careful not to
attribute to globalization the success of reduc tions in incom e po
the role of globalization in poverty reduction remains a hotly