Designing Robust MEG Distribution Systems
Jeff Zhang, Snr Flow Assurance Consultant.Paul Oakley, Staff Flow Assurance Consultant.
2 - Wood Group Kenny
Continuous MEG injection is commonly used for hydratemanagement in deepwater gas developments such as the Gorgonand Ichthys fields.MEG Distribution System (MDS) design appears deceptively simpledue to single phase operation. However, over 20 yrs in combinedexperience in MEG distribution system design has highlighted:
• Design complexity due to multi-discipline involvement;• Flow Assurance discipline is arguably best placed to
co-ordinate the MEG distribution system design.This presentation provides guidance on MDS design and typical flowassurance design challenges.
Introduction
3 - Wood Group Kenny
MEG
Reservoir• Gas Composition• Water Production• Production Profile
Onshore/Topsides Design• MEG Regeneration Units• MEG Storage Tanks• MEG Pumps & Controls
MEG Pipeline Design• Size • Design Pressure
Subsea Design• Wet Gas Meter• MEG Distribution Valve
Production Flowline
MDS Design & Interfaces
What is the role of Flow Assurance?
4 - Wood Group Kenny
Flow Assurance MDS Design
• Identification of key design decisions & stakeholder engagement in late concept /early FEED is paramount to a robust design;
• Flow Assurance considerations strongly influence the MDS design and operational robustness.
5 - Wood Group Kenny
• Minimising the MEG regeneration unit design capacity against thedesire to ensure conservative MEG overdose margins;
• Reducing the MDS design pressure against the desire to minimizeMEG pipeline sizes;
• Selecting the MEG injection location to suit the reservoircharacteristics and production profile against the desire to enhanceMDS operability.
Typical MDS Design Challenges
6 - Wood Group Kenny
Variable Unit P 1 P 2 P 3
MEG Overdose Margin % 30 30 28.6
MEG Pipeline Size inch 8 8 8
MEG Injection Location - All
DS-ChokeUS-ChokeDS-Choke
AllUS-Choke
Max. Dry Raw Gas Flowrate Bscf/d 1.9 1.6 2.4
Max. Lean MEG Rate m3/h 93 24 105
Max. SITHP bara 365 285 317
MDS Design Data Comparison
7 - Wood Group Kenny
• It is a necessary design practice to add margins to the requiredMEG injection rate to allow for uncertainties and minimise therisk of under injection.
• Excessive MEG overdose margin:• MDS over-loading from onshore/topsides to wellhead;• Production system slugging and liquid management issues.
• Typical MEG overdose margin values:• 30% for complex networks and lower for simple ones;• Further optimization requires the margin breakdown to focus
on the key contributing factors.
Optimal MEG Overdose Margin
8 - Wood Group Kenny
Composition Uncertainty
FluidDefinitionWaterProductionHydrateCurve
Metering and System Uncertainty
Water Meter
MDV
ProductionSystem
MEG Overdose Margin Contributions.
• Recent advances in MEG Injection valves (closed-loop control)provide an opportunity to significantly reduce overdose margins;
9 - Wood Group Kenny
Multiphase production flowline sizing criteria:• Pressure management: Backpressure;• Liquids management: Liquid holdup;• Solids management: Liquid film velocity.
Single phase MEG pipeline sizing criteria?• CAPEX (e.g. Pipeline standardisation and installation)• MEG deliverability and pressure safeguarding• Operability and controllability considerations
Optimal MEG Pipeline Sizing
10 - Wood Group Kenny
MEG Pipeline Sizing Trade-offsVariable Larger Pipeline Smaller Pipeline
FrictionalPressure Drop Negligible Higher
MEG Mal-distribution Lower Higher
Pressure Surge Lower Higher
MEG Pump ControlStrategy Discharge Pressure Control Discharge Pressure Control with Flow
Ratio Over-riding
11 - Wood Group Kenny
Highly dependent on subsurface data:• Reservoir characteristics (composition/P/T);• Production profiles (flowrate).
Potential for a significant impact on the subsea and onshoredesign:• Subsea Tree functionality and configuration;• MEG pipeline supply pressure;• MEG injection pump pressure setting;• Operational complexity.
MEG Injection Location
12 - Wood Group Kenny
Item Upstream of Choke Downstream of Choke
Reservoir Characteristics
Homogeneous reservoir depletion
Discrete reservoirs (High FTHP variability)
MEG Supply Pressure
High(SITHP + 20 bar)
Med.(Intermittent HP supply req’d)
XT Hydrate Blockage Risk Low Risk Med. Risk
(Hydrate kinetics analysis)
Pressure Safeguarding
High Consequence(Potential inter-connections)
Low Consequence
MEG Injection Location Trade-offs
13 - Wood Group Kenny
Simple MDS DesignUnfortunately there is no simple way to design an optimal MEDDistribution System:• Each project will likely have a unique combination of design drivers
due to the selected development concept and reservoir properties;• Each project will have a unique set of individual stakeholders, often
these are in overseas design offices;• Multi-discipline involvement results in an iterative (and sometimes
slow) design process.
14 - Wood Group Kenny
Keys to Robust MDS Design
Subsea Architecture Pressure
Safeguarding
Topsides/ Onshore Design
PipelineDesign
Well & Completion
Design
Subsurface Data
Operating Philosophy
• Early recognition that the MDS is not just a chemical injectionsystem – it is the lifeblood of the production system;
• Pre-FEED identification of key design decisions and stakeholders,to allow adequate time for recycle;
• Experienced technical Flow Assurance or “Systems” Leadershipthat understand the trade-offs being made in design decisions.
Subsea Design
Flow Assurance
Thank you!
Questions?