8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
1/100
District o Columbia Department o Health
825 North Capitol Street, NEWashington DC 20002
http://dchealth.dc.gov
Government of theDistrict of Columbia
Adrian M. Fenty, Mayor
H HH
Burden of Asthma in theDistrict of Columbia
2009
Burden of Asthma in theDistrict of Columbia
2009
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
2/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
3/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Government o the District o Columbia
Adrian M. Fenty, Mayor
Department o Health
Pierre N. D. Vigilance, M.D., M.P.H., Director
Community Health Administration
Carlos E. Cano, M.D. Senior Deputy Director
Center or Policy, Planning, and Epidemiology
John O. Davis-Cole, Ph.D., M.P.H, State Epidemiologist
AuthorsSenkuta G. Riverson, M.P.H.
Mary Frances Kornak, M.P.H.
Gebreyesus Kidane, Ph.D., M.P.H.
LaVerne H. Jones, M.P.H.
Contributing Editors
Aaron Adade, Ph.D.
Carolyn A. Bothuel
Edwina Davis-Robinson, M.S., C.H.E.S
Kerda DeHaan, M.S.
Manzur Ejaz, Ph.D.
racy Garner
We grateully acknowledge the contributions o the ollowing:
Carol Johnson, M.P.H., Centers or Disease Control
Department o Health Center or Policy, Planning and Epidemiology
George Washington University
Deborah Quint, M.P.H. and Stephen each, M.D. Improving Pediatric Care
in the District o Columbia (IMPAC DC)
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL)
Publication Date: 2009
Development and publication o this report was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number U59/CCU324208-05 rom the Centers o Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). Its contents are solely the responsibility o the authors and do not necessarily represent the ocial views o the CDC.
For additional inormation, contact the DC Control Asthma Now Program at the
DC Department o Health at (202) 442-5925
Burden of Asthma in theDistrict of Columbia
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
4/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbiaii
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
5/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
6/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbiaiv
4.2.4. Insurance .........................................................................................................................354.2.5. Disposition ......................................................................................................................36
5.0 Asthma Mortality ..................................................................................................................................395.1. Mortality Count by Subgroups ..................................................................................................395.2. Mortality Rate ..............................................................................................................................405.3. Mortality Rate by Sex, Race and Age Group ............................................................................405.4. Mortality Rate by Ward ...............................................................................................................41
6.0 Work-Related Asthma ..........................................................................................................................436.1. Prevalence o Work-Related Asthma in Te District ..............................................................44
6.1.1. WRA Study Description ................................................................................................44
6.1.2. WRA Study Results ........................................................................................................457.0 Air Quality and Asthma .......................................................................................................................47
7.1. Outdoor Environmental Pollutants ...........................................................................................477.1.1. Health Eects ..................................................................................................................48
7.2. Air Quality Standards .................................................................................................................487.3. Te Role o Outdoor Air Pollution in the District ...................................................................49
7.3.1. Study Description ...........................................................................................................507.3.2. Study Results ...................................................................................................................50
8.0 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................................................538.1. Non-Hispanic Black Population ................................................................................................538.2. Populations with Low Socioeconomic Status ...........................................................................54
8.3. Children ........................................................................................................................................548.4. Adult and Elderly Population .....................................................................................................548.5. Female Population .......................................................................................................................558.6. Populations with Other Risk Factors.........................................................................................558.7. Implications on Asthma Management ......................................................................................568.8. Work-Related Asthma .................................................................................................................568.9. Asthma and Environmental Factors ..........................................................................................56
9.0 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................599.1. Surveillance System .....................................................................................................................599.2. Asthma Management ..................................................................................................................60
9.3. Risk Factors and Preventable Events .........................................................................................609.4. Reducing Health Disparities ......................................................................................................6110. Reerences ..............................................................................................................................................63echnical Notes ...............................................................................................................................................67
Acronyms ...............................................................................................................................................68Appendix A: Work-Related Asthma Survey GWU ..................................................................................69
Survey Questions...................................................................................................................................69Appendix B: Data ables ................................................................................................................................71
Table of Contents
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
7/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Figure 1-1 Te District o Columbia by Ward designations .................................................................3
Figure 2-1 District o Columbia asthma surveillance data sources ......................................................7
Figure 2-2 Prevalence o adult asthma in District o Columbia ...........................................................9
Figure 2-3 Lietime asthma prevalence in adults over 18, District vs. US ...........................................9
Figure 2-4 Current asthma prevalence in adults over 18, District vs. US ..........................................10
Figure 2-5 Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by gender ............................................................10
Figure 2-6 Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by race/ethnicity ................................................11
Figure 2-7 Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by age group .......................................................12
Figure 2-8 Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by education level ..............................................13
Figure 2-9 Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by income level ..................................................13Figure 2-10 Prevalence o current adult (18 years) asthma by ward .................................................14
Figure 2-11 Prevalence o ormer adult (18 years) asthma by ward ..................................................14
Figure 2-12 Prevalence o childhood (17 years) asthma .....................................................................16
Figure 2-13 Prevalence o childhood (17 years) asthma by gender ...................................................17
Figure 2-14 Prevalence o childhood (17 years) asthma by race ........................................................17
Figure 2-15 Prevalence o childhood (17 years) asthma by age group ..............................................18
Figure 3-1 Respondent answers regarding episodes o asthma ..........................................................20
Figure 3-2 Episodes o asthma by gender..............................................................................................20
Figure 3-3 Episodes o asthma by race ..................................................................................................21
Figure 3-4 Frequency o visits to a doctor or routine asthma checkups ...........................................21Figure 3-5 Frequency o visits to a doctor or routine asthma checkups
by gender ................................................................................................................................22
Figure 3-6 Frequency o visits to a doctor or routine asthma doctor visit by race ..........................22
Figure 3-7 Frequency o inhaler use to stop asthma episodes ............................................................23
Figure 3-8 Frequency o inhaler use to stop asthma episodes by gender ..........................................23
Figure 3-9 Frequency o inhaler use to stop asthma episodes by race ...............................................24
Figure 3-10 Age at rst diagnosis among respondents with current asthma ......................................25
Figure 3-11 Age when diagnosed with asthma by gender .....................................................................25
Figure 3-12 Age when diagnosed with asthma by race/ethnicity .........................................................26
Figure 3-13 Days o missed work or usual activities because o asthma .............................................26Figure 3-14 Days o missed work or usual activities because o asthma
by gender ................................................................................................................................27
Figure 3-15 Days o missed work or usual activities because o asthma by race ................................27
Figure 4-1 Crude asthma hospitalization rate in the District o Columbia ......................................30
Figure 4-2 Hospitalization rates due to asthma by age group in the District
o Columbia ...........................................................................................................................30
v
List of Figures
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
8/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbiavi
Figure 4-3 Mean length o stay or asthma-related discharges and total
hospital discharges ................................................................................................................32
Figure 4-4 Age-adjusted rates o emergency department visits due to asthma
among all residents in the District o Columbia ................................................................33
Figure 4-5 otal emergency department visits due to asthma in the
District o Columbia .............................................................................................................33
Figure 4-6 Emergency department visits due to asthma by gender in the
District o Columbia .............................................................................................................34
Figure 4-7 Age-adjusted rates or children in the District o Columbia ............................................35
Figure 4-8 Distribution o insurance among emergency discharge asthma
patients in the District o Columbia ...................................................................................35
Figure 4-9 Disposition o emergency department visits due to asthma in the
District o Columbia .............................................................................................................36
Figure 4-10 Frequency o disposition o emergency department visits due to
asthma in the District o Columbia ....................................................................................37
Figure 5-1 Annual asthma mortality rate in the District o Columbia,
1999-2005 ...............................................................................................................................40
Figure 5-2 Asthma mortality rate by sex and race, District o Columbia
1999-2005 ...............................................................................................................................41
Figure 5-3 Asthma mortality rate by age group, District o Columbia
1999-2005 ...............................................................................................................................41
Figure 5-4 Crude asthma mortality rate by Ward, District o Columbia
1999-2005 ...............................................................................................................................42
List of Figures
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
9/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
10/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbiaviii
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
11/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Asthma is a chronic disease o the lungs bronchi (airways) characterized by airway hyper-respon-siveness to stimuli resulting in airow limitation, and respiratory symptoms including: breathlessness,
wheezing, coughing, and chest tightness. Symptoms can vary in severity rom mild intermittent to severe
persistent. All levels o severity can be lie threatening.
According to the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey data, approximately
9% o adult residents (40,000 adults) and 11% o children (13,000 children) currently have asthma, and
about 15% o adults have been diagnosed with asthma at some point in their lie. Overall, the prevalence
o current asthma in the District o Columbia has been consistently higher than the national rate or
the past seven years. In addition, the Districts asthma prevalence was on an upward trend rom 2000to 2004, but seemed to stabilize at slightly above 15% rom 2004 to 2007. Vital Records data or asthma
related mortality indicate an overall decreased rate rom 1999-2005, despite a rate increase in 2004.
Although asthma aects all portions o the Districts population, certain subgroups are disproportionately
aected. Te non-Hispanic black population: very young children aged 0-4 years, especially male chil-
dren o this age group, adolescent emales, adults 45-50 years and the elderly (65+ years), tobacco
smokers, obese and overweight populations, residents with less than or some high school education,
and households with an income less than $15,000 appear to be most aected by asthma.
Te District o Columbia Department o Health (DOH) Asthma Control Program launched the DCControl Asthma Now (DC CAN) Program in 2001 in order to address the national Healthy People
2010 asthma objectives, and to improve the quality o lie or District residents who suer rom asthma.
Its mission is to develop and implement a viable, comprehensive, community-based, and consumer-
centered approach to asthma diagnosis and management.
Te objectives o DC CAN are to:
Develop interventions to reduceasthma hospitalizations,deaths, and emergency department
visits among high-risk populations;
Identifybarriersinthedeliveryofasthmacareservices,particularlytotheunderservedandhigh-risk groups;
Increaseeducationandawarenessprogramsthatareculturallysensitive,andlinguisticallyappro-
priate or all racial/ethnic groups;
PromotetheuseofguidelinesfromtheNationalInstitutesofHealth(NIH)and theNational
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes (NHLBI) or the treatment and management o asthma;
ix
Executive Summary
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
12/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbiax
Educatepersonswithasthma,theirfamilymembers/caregivers,aswellashealthcareproviders
and health educators; and
Develop a comprehensive asthma surveillance and data collection system tomonitor trends
and evaluate the eectiveness o program interventions in the reduction o asthma morbidity and
mortality.
Te National Healthy People 2010 (HP 2010) includes seven goals or improving the health o thoseliving with asthma. DC HP 2010 (http://doh.dc.gov/doh/site/deault.asp) has adopted three (3) o these
goals:
Reduceasthmadeaths;
Reduceasthmahospitalization;and
Reduceemergencydepartmentvisitsrelatedtoasthma.
Key FindingsSeveral data sources were analyzed to describe the health status o persons with asthma. Te District
o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), hospital discharge data, emergency
department data, mortality records, workers compensation claims, and air quality measurements are
among the data used to outline the ndings in this report.
Adult Asthma Prevalence
In2007,BRFSSrespondentsreportedhaving:approximately15%lifetimeasthma,9%current
asthma and about 6% ormer asthma.
LifetimeasthmaprevalenceintheDistrictwasonanupwardtrendfrom2000through2004,but
stabilized at slightly above 15% between 2004 and 2007. Tere was a 28% increase in prevalencerom 2000 to 2005.
Asthma Prevalence by Gender
In2007,theprevalenceofcurrentasthmaamongadultswas47%higheramongfemales(12%)as
compared to males (6.4%).
Asthma Prevalence by Race/Ethnicity
In2007,theprevalenceofcurrentasthmawas66%higheramongnon-Hispanicblackadults
(11.8%) as compared to Hispanics (4%) and 39% higher than whites (7.2%).
Asthma Prevalence by Age
In 2005, the lifetime asthma prevalence for persons aged 18-24was approximately twice the
prevalence o persons aged 35-44, 45-54, and 55-64; this was statistically signicant. By 2007,
persons aged 25-34 had the highest lietime asthma prevalence, ollowed by 35-44 and 18-24
year olds.
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
13/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
14/100
Asthma Doctor Visits
Approximately30%ofBRFSSrespondentswithcurrentasthmareportedhavingoneroutine
doctor visit, 32% reported 2-4 visits, and 9% reported 5 or more visits in the past 12 months.
Non-Hispanicblackrespondentsindicatedasignicantlyhigherfrequency(morethantwice)of
routine doctor visits at 2-4 times more than their white counterparts.
Inhaler Use
In2005,approximately30%ofBRFSSrespondentswithcurrentasthmareportedusinganinhaler
1-4 times and 9% reported using an inhaler 5 or more times to stop an asthma attack in the past
month.
Almost twice as many women (10.7%) used an inhaler ve or more times as compared to men (5.5%).
Almosttwiceasmanynon-Hispanicblackrespondents(34.6%)withasthmareportedusinginhalers
1-4 times in the past month as compared to their non-Hispanic white counterparts (19.3%).
Reportsofneverusinganinhalerwere43%higheramongnon-Hispanicwhitesthannon-Hispanicblacks.
Age at First Diagnosis
In2005,thehighestproportionofrespondentswithcurrentasthma(22%)reportedaninitial
diagnosis beore the age o 19 ollowed a lower 19% with an initial diagnosis between ages
20-39 years.
edatashowthatmentendtobeinitiallydiagnosedatayoungeragethanwomenintheDistricts
population.
Amajority of non-Hispanic whites reported being initially diagnosed before the age of 19,
while the highest proportion o non-Hispanic blacks reported initial diagnosis between the ages
o 20-39.
Limited Activity
In2005,approximately12%ofrespondentswithcurrentasthmaindicatedthattheywereunable
to work or carry out usual activities due to asthma lasting 1-5 days, and almost 10% indicated that
their work or usual activity was restricted due to asthma lasting six or more days.
Asthma Hospitalization
ereisageneraldecreasingtrendinthecrudeasthmahospitaldischargeratefrom2002(20.2
per 10,000 persons) to 2005 (17.1 per 10,000 persons).
From2002to2005thehighestrateofhospitalizationoccurredamongchildrenunderveyears
old, middle aged (45-50 years) and the elderly (60-75 years).
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbiaxii
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
15/100
Emergency Department (ED) Visits
eage-adjustedratesofEDvisitsduetoasthmaintheDistrictincreasedslightlyfrom208.1per
10,000 in 2005 to 219.2 per 10,000 in 2006.
erateofEDvisitsduetoasthmawashighestamongchildren1to4yearsofageandadults40
to 50 years o age in 2005 and 2006.
In2006,malesundertheageof15yearshadahigherEDvisitratethantheirfemalecounterparts.However, emales had a higher ED visit rate than males afer the age o 15.
In2006,thedatashowedanincreaseinhospitaladmissionsfromtheEDasageincreased.
Mortality
easthmamortalityratefrom1999to2005was11.6per100,000persons.
Fromyear1999to2005,theasthmamortalityrateofnon-Hispanicblackswasapproximately4
times higher than those o non-Hispanic whites.
AsthmamortalityrateamongmaleDistrictresidents(12per100,000)wasslightlyhigherthantheir emale counterparts (11.2 per 100,000) rom 1999 to 2005.
Moreasthmadeathsoccurredamongadultsthanchildren(0-17years)andthenumberofdeaths
increased by age.
Wards7,5and8hadthehighest,andWard3hadthelowestasthmamortalityratesintheDistrict
rom 1999 to 2005.
Work-Related Asthma
erewere39casesofwork-relatedasthma(WRA)intheDistrictfrom1999to2005asreported
by workers compensation claims. A study was conducted to validate that all WRA cases were
captured using the worker compensation claims database. Te study identied 18% more cases in
one year compared to the workers compensation claims database that spanned seven years.
Outdoor Air Quality and Asthma
estrongestrelationshipbetweenozoneandasthma-relatedMedicaidpatientvisitswasseenin
the age group 5-12 years.
Grasspolleneectsonasthma exacerbationswerestrongest for the 5-12 and 13-20year old
age groups.
Particulatematterlessthan2.5mindiameter(PM2.5)levelsweresignicantlyassociatedwith
asthma-related Medicaid patient visits or 5-12 year olds.
Wards5,6,and8showedsignicantozoneimpactsforagegroups13-20,21-49,andallages,
respectively. When data were urther restricted to 1999 (a year with higher than average ozone
and PM2.5 concentrations, as well as higher summer temperatures), the ward specic impacts o
ozone and PM2.5 on 5-12 year olds were signicant, and strongest in Ward 7.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia xii
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
16/100
Summary o RecommendationsAsthma represents a considerable burden on the District o Columbia. Despite some improvements in
asthma prevalence nationally, the District is lagging behind. Tere are many opportunities or improve-
ment as evidenced by racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities. Non-Hispanic blacks, low
income populations, residents in Wards 6, 7 and 8, the homeless population, young children (< 5 years),
school-aged children, middle aged adults (45-50), and the elderly are all subpopulations that need
specic attention when considering reduction o asthma prevalence, severity, and mortality in theDistrict. Te reports ndings suggest the need or improvement in asthma surveillance, management,
health disparities and reduction in risk actors, and preventable events.
eDistrictofColumbianeedstomaintaina consistentdatacollectionmechanism thatwill
capture prevalence, emergency department and hospitalization data by race, ward, and school
district level as well as data on asthma management by subpopulations.
ereisalsoasignicantneedtodevelopabetterdatacollectionmethodologyforwork-related
asthma (WRA) in order to better estimate the prevalence o WRA in the District. Tis may mean
orging partnerships with stakeholders (DC Oce o Workers Compensation, physicians. em-
ployers etc.) to establish an active data collection system.
Asthma interventionprogramsneed toencourage proper asthmamanagement bymitigating
primary health care barriers or at-risk populations. DC DOH needs to continue to orm partner-
ships with the Districts schools to improve asthma management in school-aged children.
WRAisadiseasethatispreventable;asthmainterventionsneedtoeducatehealthcareproviders,
employers and employees on the diagnosis, and prevention o WRA.
Obesityandtobaccosmokeareriskfactorsthatneedtobeintegratedinasthmapreventionstrate-gies especially those targeting children.
Racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinasthmamorbidityandmortalityneedtobeaddressedby
targeting resources, orming partnerships, and implementing outcome based interventions that
utilize asthma data to set goals, and routinely assess improvements.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbiaxiv
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
17/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Asthma is a chronic disease o the lungs bronchi (airways) characterized by airway hyper-respon-siveness to stimuli resulting in airow limitation and respiratory symptoms including breathlessness,
wheezing, coughing, and chest tightness. Symptoms can vary in severity rom mild intermittent (aect-
ing activity levels) to severe persistent. All levels o severity can be lie- threatening.
1.1. Cause and TriggersWhy a person develops asthma depends on complex interactions o genetic and environmental ac-
tors that are not thoroughly understood. However, triggers that exacerbate asthma episodes have been
well studied and are much better understood. Asthma triggers and symptoms vary rom person to
person. Common asthma triggers include:
Allergenspollen, animal dander, dust, mites, cockroaches, and mold
Irritantscold air, perume, pesticides, strong odors, weather changes, cigarette smoke, and
chalk dusts
Respiratoryinfectionscold or u
Physicalexerciseespeciallyincoldweather
Stress
1.2. Public Health SignifcanceIn 2005, more than 22 million Americans had asthma and o these 6 million were children.1 Asthma is
one o the most common chronic diseases aecting children in the United States. Te burden o asthma
not only aects the patients, but also their amilies and society in terms o: lost days o work and school,
lessened quality o lie, and avoidable emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths.2
Asthma is one o the leading causes o school absenteeism.3 In 2003, an estimated 12.8 million school
days were missed due to asthma among more than our million children who reported at least one
asthma attack in the preceding year.4
In addition, asthma is the leading cause o preventable hospital-ization with approximately 500,000 hospitalizations and 1.5 million emergency department visits, thus
burdening the health care system.5 It also accounts or over 5,500 avoidable deaths each year.6
Te direct cost o asthma (hospitalization, physician, and prescription drugs) in the US in 2007 was
estimated to be $14.7 billion. Indirect costs such as loss o school days, loss o work, and deaths were
estimated at an additional $5 billion with the total economic cost o $19.7 billion. Prescription drugs
represented the largest single direct medical expenditure at $6.2 billion.7
1
1. Introduction
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
18/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
19/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
20/100
Te disparity in wealth is evident in neighborhoods that exist with economic challenges. Studies show
that low-income amilies, minorities, and children living in inner cities are at a higher risk o emer-
gency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths due to asthma than the general population. Te
income distribution or the District is outlined below in able 1-2.
able 1-2: District o Columbia population, race and socio-economic distribution by Ward
1.4.1. Control Asthma Now (DC CAN)Te District o Columbia Department o Health (DOH) launched the DC Control Asthma Now (DC
CAN) Program in 2001 in order to address the national Healthy People 2010 asthma objectives and
to improve the quality o lie or District residents who suer rom asthma. Its mission is to develop
and implement a viable, comprehensive, community-based, consumer-centered approach to asthma
diagnosis, and management.
Te Districts rst Burden o Asthma Report was published in 2003, and its Asthma Strategic Plan was
completed in 2004. It was anticipated that implementation o the plan would enable the District to achieve
more optimal levels o eectiveness and eciency in the use o available care delivery resources and
thus, reduce the burden o asthma in the District.
Te objectives o DC CAN are as ollows:
Developandimplementinterventionstoreduceasthmahospitalizations,deaths,andemergency
department visits, especially or the high-risk population (children, seniors, blacks, and Hispanics).
Developandimplementinterventionstoreduceasthmahospitalizations,deaths,andemergency
department visits, especially or the high-risk population (children, seniors, blacks, and Hispanics).
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia4
Population a Age a, b Race a Medicaid b Income d Unemployed d
WardCensus,
200018+ 65+ Black
HispanicLatino
Number ofRecipients
Median,1999
Percent
1
2
3
4
5
67
8
73,364
68,869
73,718
74,092
72,527
68,03570,540
70,914
17%
11%
13%
21%
22%
19%28%
37%
8%
9%
14%
17%
18%
11%14%
6%
43%
30%
6%
78%
88%
69%97%
92%
23%
9%
7%
13%
3%
2%1%
2%
15,218
20,864
1,649
15,009
18,969
16,67624,199
28,841
$36,802
$44,742
$71,875
$46,408
$34,433
$41,554$30,533
$25,017
5%
6%
7%
4%
8%
6%7%
12%
DC 572,059 20% 12% 60% 8% 141,941 c $40,127 7%
a DC State Center or Health Statistics; Policy, Planning, and Research Administration, Vital Statistics 2004.
b Working Together or Health: MEDICAID Annual Report, FY 2005. DC Department o Health, Medical Assistance Admin.
c Total includes those missing
d DC Oce o Planning, 1999 Median Household and Per Capita Income by Ward
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
21/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
22/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia6
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
23/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
As partners across the District work towards developing and implementing asthma interventions, itis vital to know the current asthma prevalence in order to target and measure the impact o interven-
tions. Tis report summarizes the DC CAN surveillance that utilizes data rom various sources and
key stakeholders to portray a comprehensive picture o asthma in the District o Columbia, as shown
in Figure 2-1. Te goal o the report is to provide baseline data and guidance or the development o
targeted asthma intervention programs and policies.
Figure 2-1: District o Columbia asthma surveillance data sources
2.1. Measuring Asthma PrevalenceAsthma prevalence is estimated using the District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
Systems (BRFSS) survey data. Te BRFSS is an annual telephone health survey o approximately 4,000
adults aged 18 years and older. Te survey uses standardized interviewing methods and questionnaires,
and covers a broad spectrum o health behaviors. For this report, data rom 2000-2007 has been used
7
Data Sources
DC
CA
N
Surveillanc
eData
AsthmaPrevalence
Severity andQuality o Lie
Environmental
Work-related
Mortality
BRFSS
HospitalDischarge
Medicaid
WorkersCompensation
Vital Statistics
EmergencyDepartment
Air Quality
GWU Survey
2. Asthma Burden in theDistrict of Columbia
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
24/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
25/100
Figure 2-2: Prevalence o adult asthma in the District o Columbia
Figure 2-3 shows that asthma prevalence in the District has been on an upward trend rom 2000 through2005. In 2000, the prevalence was estimated at 11% and rose steadily to 15.5% in 2006, which is a 29%
increase. Te prevalence increase rom 2000 to 2006 is statistically signicant at p
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
26/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
27/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 11
2.2.2. Asthma Prevalence by Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic black respondents have a higher prevalence o current asthma as compared to Hispanics
or non-Hispanic whites as shown in Figure 2-6. Tere is a statistically signicant dierence in preva-
lence o current asthma among non-Hispanic whites, and non-Hispanic blacks, with non-Hispanic
blacks experiencing a 37% higher prevalence than non-Hispanic whites. Similarly, non-Hispanic blacks
experience current asthma at a 23% higher rate than Hispanics. Tere was a 23% higher prevalence
o lietime asthma among non-Hispanic blacks as compared to non-Hispanic whites. Te prevalence olietime asthma among Hispanics is 33% higher than their non-Hispanic black counterparts. Te prev-
alence rate or ormer asthma by race was more than twice as high or Hispanics in comparison to
non-Hispanic blacks or whites.
Figure 2-6: Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by race/ethnicity
2.2.3. Asthma Prevalence by Age Group
In 2007, the highest lietime asthma prevalence was reported among 18-24 year old residents (24.8%)
ollowed by the 25-34 year olds (18%), as shown in Figure 2-7. Te lietime asthma prevalence or both
18-24 and 25-34 year old respondents was signicantly higher than their 65 year, and older counterparts.
In addition, the prevalence or 18-24 year olds was approximately twice the prevalence or ages 35-44,
45-54, and 55-64; this was statistically signicant.
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007
Percentage
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
28/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
29/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 13
Figure 2-8: Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by education level
Figure 2-9 shows the highest prevalence o lietime, and current asthma among respondents reporting a
household income less than $15,000. Data analysis showed no statistical signicant dierences between
income groups or lietime, and ormer asthma. However, there was a signicantly higher current asth-
ma rate among residents reporting an income less than $15,000 as compared to those reporting an
income above $75,000. Current asthma prevalence rate was more than two times higher among respon-
dents reporting less than a $15,000 household income than those reporting an income above $75,000.
Figure 2-9: Prevalence o adult (18 years) asthma by income level
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007
Per
centage
Percentage
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
30/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
31/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 15
Wards 3 and 4 have the lowest prevalence o current asthma, and correspondingly have the highest
ormer adult asthma. Ward 3 and 4 both have the highest median household incomes, and the lowest
number o Medicaid recipients in the District. Tese results are consistent with earlier ndings that
respondents with higher socioeconomic status have lower current asthma prevalence.
2.2.6. Risk Factors Associated with Elevated Asthma Prevalence
BMI and Asthma
In 1998, the National Institutes o Health (NIH) released clinical guidelines or the identication o
overweight, and obesity based on the body mass index (BMI); an individuals weight in kilograms
divided by their height in meters, squared. According to the guidelines, individuals with a BMI greater
than or equal to 30 are considered to be obese, those with BMI greater than 25, but lower than 29.9
are considered overweight. In 2005, approximately 14% o respondents who were obese, 8% who were
overweight,andanother8%ofnormalweight(BMI>18and
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
32/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
33/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
34/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia18
Figure 2-15 shows that approximately 8% o District children under the age o 9, and almost 16%
between ages 9 to 17 had asthma in 2005. Tere is a 47% higher current asthma prevalence rate among
9 to 17 year old children compared to those less than 9 years o age.
Figure 2-15: Prevalence o childhood (17 years) asthma by age group
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005
Percentage
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
35/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Appropriate disease management improves the quality o lie o persons with asthma. Tis sectioncharacterizes the experience o individuals with asthma in the District by describing their asthma man-
agement, and quality o lie as measured by age at rst diagnosis, requency o inhaler use, routine doc-
tor visits, rate o asthma attack, and activity limitation due to asthma.
3.1. Measuring Asthma Management and Quality o Lie
In 2003, the Districts BRFSS surveillance study began to include questions related to asthma management
and quality o lie issues that would be used to estimate the severity o symptoms in those with currentasthma. Tese questions were administered to adult (18 years) respondents who reported having
current asthma. Te number sampled in this module was small because this section o the total survey
only sampled persons with current asthma (a smaller segment o the population). In this section o
the report, only results rom data collected in 2005 were available or analysis. In uture reports, data
or multiple years will be combined in order to better describe the quality o lie and disease manage-
ment or subgroups with asthma.
3.2. Asthma SeverityAsthma severity can be measured by the number o asthma episodes reported, the number o asthmarelated doctors visits, and the requency o inhaler use. Te ollowing three sections examine each o
these indicators or signicant trends.
3.2.1. Asthma Episodes (Attacks)
Respondents who were determined to have current asthma were asked: During the past 12 months,
have you had an episode o asthma or an asthma attack? As shown in Figure 3-1 or the year 2005,
approximately 45% answered yes, indicating that they had an episode o asthma or an asthma attack
in the past 12 months.
19
3. Asthma Management andQuality of Life
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
36/100
Figure 3-1: Occurrence o asthma episodes
In 2005, male respondents (50.7%) reported experiencing a higher proportion o asthma attacks in thepast 12 months as compared to emales (41%). However, Figure 3-2 indicates that the dierences were
not statistically signicant by gender. Similarly, there was no signicant dierence in the respondents
experiencing asthma attacks by race. Figure 3-3 shows that 43.5 % o non-Hispanic whites and 45.8%
o non-Hispanic blacks who currently have asthma responded that they had experienced an episode o
asthma or an asthma attack during the previous year. Data on Hispanics was insucient to include in
the analysis.
Figure 3-2: Episodes o asthma by gender
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia20
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005
Percentage
Percentage
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
37/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 21
Figure 3-3: Episodes o asthma by race
3.2.2. Routine Doctor VisitsTe BRFSS was also used to estimate the requency o routine doctor visits among those reporting cur-
rent asthma. Tese respondents were asked: During the past 12 months, how many times did you see
a doctor, nurse, or other health proessional or a routine checkup or your asthma? Figure 3 4 shows
that the majority o respondents (32%) with current asthma reported that they have routine doctor
visits two to our times a year. About 30% reported either zero or one routine visit per year. Te survey
data shows that a signicantly lower proportion o respondents (8.6%) with current asthma have ve
or more routine doctor visits a year.
Figure 3-4: Frequency o visits to a doctor or routine asthma checkups
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005
Percentage
Percentage
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
38/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
39/100
3.2.3. Inhaler Use
Respondents with current asthma were asked: During the past 30 days how ofen did you take a pre-
scription asthma inhaler during an asthma attack to stop it? Figure 3-7 shows that a majority (61%)
never used an inhaler to stop asthma episodes in the past month. However, approximately 30% indi-
cated they had used an inhaler 1-4 times, and 9% had used an inhaler 5 or more times in the past 30
days to stop an asthma attack in 2005.
Figure 3-7: Frequency o inhaler use to stop asthma episodes
As illustrated in Figure 3 8, a higher percent o males (34.4%) used an inhaler 1-4 times in the past month
as compared to emales (27.4%). However, almost twice as many women (10.7%) used an inhaler 5 or
more times as compared to men (5.5%).
Figure 3-8: Frequency o inhaler use to stop asthma episodes by gender
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 23
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005
Source: District o Columbia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2005
Percentage
Percentage
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
40/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
41/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
42/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
43/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
44/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia28
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
45/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
46/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
47/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
48/100
4.1.2. Mean Length of Stay
Te mean length o stay (LOS) or asthma hospital discharges rom 1997 to 2003 had very little vari-
ability with an average LOS o 3.7 days. For all hospitalizations in the District, the mean LOS decreased
rom 6.7 days in 1997 to 5.8 days in 2003 as shown in Figure 4-3.
Figure 4-3: Mean length o stay or asthma-related discharges and total hospital discharges
4.2. Emergency Department Visit Due to Asthma
Emergency department (ED) data or asthma was collected and analyzed or the years 2002 through
2006. Te dataset captured all resident visits made by children (age 12 months to 17 years). Data on
adult use o the emergency department were captured or the years 2005 and 2006. Data include all
visits with primary, secondary or tertiary diagnosis o asthma and is collected retrospectively. Te EDdata were collected uniormly rom all non-military District hospitals ollowing established protocols.
While some proportion o these visits are made by individuals who do not live in the District (or ex-
ample, 30% o all visits and nearly 40% o pediatric visits in 2005), the data presented below include
only ED visits made by District residents.
4.2.1. Age-adjusted ED Visit Rates
Te age-adjusted ED visit rate due to asthma in the District in 2005 and 2006 was 208 and 219 per
10,000 persons respectively. Figure 4-4 shows that the age-adjusted rate o ED visits increased rom
2005 to 2006. However, this increase was primarily among emales who had an 11% increase in their
ED visit rate in the same period.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia32
Source: District o Columbia Hospital Association
NumberofDays
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
49/100
Figure 4-4: Age-adjusted rates o emergency department visits due to asthma
among all residents in the District o Columbia
Figure 4-5 shows that in 2005 and 2006, the rate o ED visits was the highest among children 1-4 years
old and adults 40 to 50 years old which is consistent with hospitalization rates presented above. However,
asthma data or the 1-4 year old age group should be interpreted with caution or several reasons. o
begin with, it is ofen dicult to elicit enough cooperation rom these young children to obtain accu-
rate objective pulmonary unction assessments. More importantly, these young children are prone to
temporary reactive airway conditions or developmental reasons. Also, it is possible that these children
may spend less time outdoors than older school-age children. Tereore, there is some debate over
whether children younger than ve years are always accurately diagnosed as asthmatic when in act
some o them might be suering rom a more temporary reactive airway condition that may or will dis-
appear as they grow older.11 (Tis is a controversial statement and/or issue in the asthma community.)
Figure 4-5: otal emergency department visits due to asthma in the District o Columbia
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 33
Source: Improving Pediatric Asthma Care in the District o Columbia, 2005 -2006
Source: Improving Pediatric Asthma Care in the District o Columbia, 2005 -2006
Rate(per10
,000)
Rate(per10,0
00)
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
50/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
51/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
52/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
53/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 37
Figure 4-10: Frequency o disposition o emergency department visits due
to asthma in the District o Columbia
Source: Improving Pediatric Asthma Care in the District o Columbia, 2006
Percentage
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
54/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
55/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Asthma mortality data was obtained rom the District o Columbia State Center or Health Statistics,Vital Records Division. Data on death was abstracted rom death certicates. Asthma deaths weredened as the primary cause o death as coded by the enth Revision o the International Classicationo Diseases (ICD-10), code J45 and J46.
5.1. Mortality Count by SubgroupsTe annual asthma deaths in the District o Columbia rom 1999 to 2005 were low (less than 15 per year).However, some patterns can be observed. From years 1999 to 2005, a total o 67 deaths were attributed
to asthma. A majority o the asthma deaths occurred among non-Hispanic blacks. Meanwhile, or allthe six years combined only six deaths (as compared to 61 deaths in non-Hispanic blacks) occurredamong Non-Hispanic whites. Mortality data by age group reveals that more asthma deaths occurredamong adults as compared to children (0-17 years), and the number o asthma deaths increased by age.Tere were no deaths due to asthma among 0-4 year-old children rom 1999 to 2005.
able 5-1: Annual asthma mortality count in the District o Columbia, 1999-2005
39
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1999-2005
SexMale
Female
3
8
5
5
5
4
3
3
5
4
7
7
4
4
32
35
Race/Ethnicity
WhiteBlackOther
1100
0100
090
060
180
2120
260
6610
Age
0-45-17
18-4445-6465+
01244
00127
00243
01311
00144
00464
00224
02
152327
Ward
12
345678
22
010042
10
041121
11
012031
10
011201
11
101113
03
014132
11
022020
78
110115
1510
Total 11 10 9 6 9 14 8 67
Source: District o Columbia State Center or Health Statistics
5. Asthma Mortality
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
56/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
57/100
Figure 5-2: Asthma mortality rate by sex and race, District o Columbia, 1999-2005
Figure 5-3: Asthma mortality rate by age group, District o Columbia 1999-2005
5.4. Mortality Rate by WardTe Districts asthma mortality rate was stratied by Ward in order to determine the geographical di-
erences. Wards 7, 5 and 8 had the highest asthma mortality rates and Ward 3 had the lowest asthmamortality rates in the District rom 1999 to 2005. Te data revealed that most asthma deaths occurred
amongst non-Hispanic black individuals. Wards 7, 5 and 8 have the highest proportion o non-Hispan-
ic black residents in the District, while Ward 3 has the lowest (see able 1-2).
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 41
Source: District o Columbia State Center or Health Statistics
Source: District o Columbia State Center or Health Statistics
Rate(per
100,0
00)
Rate(per100,0
00)
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
58/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
59/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Work-related asthma (WRA) is the most prevalent occupational lung disease in industrial countries.WRA a disease that is attributable to or is made worse by environmental exposure in the workplace.
It is diagnosed by conrming the cause o the diagnosis o asthma and by establishing a relationship
between asthma and the workplace. WRA is suspected in every adult-onset case or asthma that is ex-
acerbated in adult lie.
Tere are over 250 workplace agents associated with WRA. Te most common include protein molecules
(wood dust, grain dust, animal dander, ungal substances, and latex) or chemicals like diisocyanates.
Tis type o asthma is partially or completely preventable and reversible, i irritants are controlled or
stopped.12 Workers at an increased risk include those in proessions that deal with wood or metal works,laboratory and health care workers, and drug and detergent manuacturers. Based on previous studies
in other states, work-related asthma has occurred more in operators, abricators, and laborers (32.9%),
ollowed by managerial and proessional specialties (20.2%).13 Smoking in the workplace which also
contributes to the exposure to secondhand smoke is another known asthma irritant.
Te District o Columbia has an economic prole that includes industries in which occupational asth-
ma is a requent health risk. Tese include construction (associated with numerous triggers including
di-isocyanates), the hospitality industry (solvents and cleaning agents), printing (solvents and inks),
health care (latex and medications), biomedical research (latex and animal antigens), and automotive
repair (solvents and epoxy compounds).
Generally, WRA is underestimated. Tis is likely true o all occupational diseases, especially occu-
pational respiratory disorders which are ofen misattributed to non-occupational etiologies such as
smoking or non-occupational allergens. Furthermore, measuring the prevalence o reported WRA in
the United States has been challenging due to the lack o a centralized comprehensive reporting or
surveillance system. Currently, most WRA data are ascertained rom workers compensation databases
and the social security disability index. However, the National Institute o Occupational Saety and
Health (NIOSH) has unded a state-based surveillance program. Te program includes our states:
New Jersey, Caliornia, Massachusetts, and Michigan which actively solicit occupational asthma re-
ports rom physicians. Data rom these our states rom 1993-1999 show over 2,500 cases o WRA.
Alternatively, the respiratory disease surveillance system, Surveillance o Work and Occupational Re-
spiratory Diseases (SWORD) located in the United Kingdom has proven to be an ecient and eective
model to provide inormation on WRA incidences. Tis system has demonstrated that WRA is more
common and involves more antigen and trigger exposures than previously estimated.
43
6. Work-Related Asthma
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
60/100
6.1. Prevalence o Work-Related Asthma in the DistrictData on work related asthma were acquired by DC CAN rom the DC Oce o Workers Compensation.
From 1999-2005, thirty nine (39) claims were led by District employers whose employees worked in
the District o Columbia. Tis equates to 5.6 per year or the seven-year period. Tis is an exceptionally
low gure and most likely an undercount. Te majority o individuals with work-related illnesses how-
ever, do not le Workers Compensation Claims. Many sel-employed workers such as independent
contractors, ederal employees, or railroad workers are not covered by the state compensation claimsoce. In addition, hospital discharge data was reviewed to identiy claims paid by workers compensa-
tion. However, these eorts yielded minimal results. Because there are no parallel reporting mecha-
nisms or surveillance systems, it is dicult to obtain an accurate estimate o WRA.
o ascertain a better estimation o WRA prevalence in the District; in 2006, the DC CAN partnered with
the George Washington University Department o Environmental and Occupational Health School o
Public Health and Health Services to conduct a WRA study.14 Te two objectives o this study were:
TodetermineifcasesofWRAareundercountedintheDistrictofColumbia;and
TodeterminethefeasibilityofasimpleactivereportingsystemtomonitorWRAcases.
Te ollowing two sections describe the study and summarize the study results.
6.1.1. WRA Study Description
A questionnaire developed at the George Washington University was sent to 220 physicians who practice
in the District o Columbia. Te survey population that was chosen consisted o a broad range o
disciplines including occupational medicine, pulmonary disease, internal medicine, amily practice,
and general practice. Each specialty was chosen or an increased probability o capturing practicing
physicians who were specialists in lung disease, working in a large academic hospital or amily practicephysicians at a ree clinic who would potentially diagnose occupational asthma cases.
Te survey was administered via internet and US mail. It contained seven questions that took ve to
seven minutes to complete. Te details o this survey are summarized in Appendix A. It consisted o
both open ended and restricted choice answers. Te survey questions were designed to ascertain:
enumberofWRAcasesdiagnosedin2005;
IfpatientswithWRAhadsubmittedaworkerscompensationclaimagainsttheiremployer;and
WhichoccupationsweremostlikelytobeperformedbythosewithWRA.
A third party, Medical Marketing Service (MMS), distributed the link to physicians asking them to
complete this ree-internet survey. Afer having the internet version o the survey open or three weeks,
an additional step was taken to increase the response rate. A mass mailing was sent to all physicians in
the District o Columbia via the United States Postal Service, assuming that the ones who responded
via the internet would not respond to the mailing.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia44
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
61/100
6.1.2. WRA Study Results
Te response rate or both the internet and mail survey was 16.8%. Te study ound 46 work related
asthma cases in 2005 alone (29 males and 17 emales). Te average age or those being diagnosed with
occupational asthma was 38.6 years old. Te most common occupations among patients with WRA re-
ported by physicians in the study were construction laborers and workers in the public administration
eld (guards, police ocers, environmental quality, and housing inspectors).
Te study resulted in the identication o 18% more cases in one year compared to the Workers Com-
pensation Claims database that spanned seven years. Tis result conrms the hypothesis that work
related asthma is underreported in the District o Columbia. Te studys low response rate and relative
insensitivity suggests that there are more cases than captured by the study. In order to measure an ac-
curate prevalence o WRA, a more sophisticated survey system with strict case denitions and incen-
tives to solicit increased physician response would be necessary. Alternatively, a surveillance system
similar to the GWU WRA Survey and SWORD would eciently capture data necessary to estimate and
characterize WRA in the District. A WRA surveillance tool would help expand the existing DC CAN
asthma surveillance system where WRA data can be studied along with the other sources o asthma.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 45
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
62/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia46
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
63/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Asthma is associated with a variety o environmental risk actors such as indoor air pollution (smok-ing, cockroach, dust, etc.) in addition to outdoor air pollution (ozone, particulate matter, tree pollen,
weed pollen, mold, etc.). Current evidence suggests that environmental exposure is at least one o the
most important causative actors that contribute to asthma aggravation. Additionally, environmental
exposures may be risk actors that are more amenable to change as compared to social or psychosocial
problems.15
7.1. Outdoor Environmental PollutantsTere are a variety o outdoor environmental pollutants such as ozone (O3) and particulate matter(PM) that have been ound to have an adverse impact on health.
Ozone is a gas that is present in two layers o the atmosphere and orms and reacts under the action o sun-
light. Higher up in the atmosphere, ozone acts as a protective layer that shields the earth rom high levels
o Ultra-Violet (UV) radiation. However, ozone at ground-level is considered a major air pollutant.
Particulate matter is the sum o all solid and liquid particles suspended in air, many o which are hazardous.
Tis complex mixture contains organic and inorganic particles such as dust, pollen, soot, smoke, and
liquid droplets. Tese particles vary in size, composition and origin. Based on size, particulate matter
is divided into two main groups:
ecoarsefractioncontainsthe larger particleswithsizesranging from2.5 to10m(PM10
PM2.5).
enefractioncontainsthesmalleroneswithsizesupto2.5m(PM2.5).eparticlesinthe
nefractionwhicharesmallerthan0.1marecalledultraneparticles.
When particulate matter is combined with other air pollutants, the individual health eects o each
pollutant are cumulative. In certain cases, especially or combinations o particulate matter with ozone
or allergens, harmul eects were shown to be even greater than the sum o the individual eects.
47
7. Air Quality and Asthma
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
64/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia48
7.1.1. Health Effects
Certain groups o people are more susceptible to suer adverse health eects due to ambient air pollution.
Tese include elderly people, children, people with pre-existing heart and lung disease, asthmatics, and
socially disadvantaged and poorly educated populations.
Pollutants, O
3
16, 17
and PM,18
have been directly linked to airway inammation and obstruction thatleads to respiratory morbidity. Inner cities in the United States, including the District, have social and
economic inuences (e.g. psychosocial stress, high smoking rates, inappropriate medication use, inad-
equate resources, and poor access to quality health care) that increase their vulnerability to outdoor
environmental exposures.15
7.2. Air Quality Standards
In response to adverse health eects o outdoor air pollutants, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has legislated standards or air quality.
Te Clean Air Act, which was last amended in 1990, requires EPA to setNational Ambient Air
Quality Standards (40 CFR part 50) for pollutants considered harmful to public health and the
environment. Te Clean Air Act established two types of national air quality standards. Primary
standards set limits to protect public health, including the health of sensitive populations
such as asthmatics, children, and the elderly. Secondary standards set limits to protect public
welfare, including protection against decreased visibility, damage to animals, crops, vegetation,
and buildings.19
Te EPA Oce o Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) has set National Ambient Air Quality
Standards or six principal pollutants, which are called criteria pollutants. able 7-1 lists national
ambient air quality standards. Units o measure or the standards are parts per million (ppm) by vol-
ume,milligramspercubicmeterofair(mg/m3),andmicrogramspercubicmeterofair(g/m3).
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
65/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
66/100
Te specic objectives o this program were to:
Documentfurthertherelationshipbetweenenvironmentalexposuresandhumanhealtheects;
Gain greater ability to undertake health impact assessment, policy development and assurance;
and
Generateinformationthatwouldguidepolicydevelopmentanddecisionmakingonprevention
and treatment activities, as well as resource allocation.
7.3.1. Study Description
Te study employed three sources o data:
Dailyasthma-relatedMedicaidpatientvisitsforallagescovering135monthsfromOctober1994
to December 2005;
AirqualitydatafromDCmonitoringstations,includingaero-allergendataformoldsporesand
tree, weed, and grass pollen rom the US Army Centralized Allergen Extract Laboratory at the
Walter Reed Army Medical Center; and
WeatherdatafromtheNationalWeatherServicedatafromReaganNationalAirport.
Case denitions were developed or both asthma-related emergency department (ED) and general
acute care visits among Medicaid patients. Asthma-related Medicaid patient ED visits were dened as
hospital ED visits o Medicaid patients with asthma-related discharge ICD-9 codes in one o the rst three
positions o their record. Tese data are subsets o the data in the next case denition. Asthma-related
Medicaid patient general acute care visits were dened as records included in the case denition
above plus Medicaid records designated as physician services, outpatient services, nurse practitioner
services, ederally-qualied health center services, clinic services, emergency ambulance services, Mental
Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Administration waiver services, and ambulance services
(representing about 63% o the overall Medicaid database). Tese additional records were also restrictedto those with asthma-related ICD-9 codes in one o the rst three diagnosis code positions.
7.3.2. Study Results
When seasonal trends o asthma-related visits were examined, the investigators ound two annual
peaks in both ED and general acute care Medicaid patient visits. Te highest peak ell during Sep-
tember to November and the second-highest peak during March to May. Air quality measurements
revealed that June through September typically had the highest daily concentrations o ozone, PM2.5,
and PM10 with relatively small spatial variation among monitoring stations. Weather measurements
were included in this study because high temperatures are associated with more sunlight, which reactswith automobile emissions to produce ozone. Tereore, as expected, high temperature days tended to
correlate with high ozone days.
As expected, weekly pollen and mold counts were seasonal with tree pollen peaking in April, grass
in May-June, weed pollen in August-September, and mold in September-October. Mold also peaked
occasionally in May or August.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia50
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
67/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
68/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia52
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
69/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
In the District o Columbia, approximately 9% o adult residents (40,000 people) and 11% o children(13,000 children) currently have asthma and about 15% o adults have been diagnosed with asthma at
some point in their lietime (DC BRFSS, 2005). Overall, the prevalence o current asthma has been con-
sistently higher than the national rate or the past six years. In addition, the Districts lietime asthma
prevalence has been on an upward trend rom 2000 to 2004 but seems to be stabilizing at 15.2% in
2007.
Although asthma aects all segments o the District population, certain subgroups are disproportionately
aected by asthma including:
Non-Hispanicblackpopulation,
Veryyoungchildrenaged0-4years,especiallymalechildrenofthisagegroup,
Femalesaerpuberty(startingfromtheearlyteens);
Adultsaged45-50years,
eelderly(over65years),
Tobaccosmokers,
Obeseandoverweightresidents,
Residentswithlessthanorsomehighschooleducation,and
Residentswithhouseholdincomeslessthan$15,000.
8.1. Non-Hispanic Black PopulationAsthma disparities continue to be an issue in the District, with the non-Hispanic black population
being aected most severely. Non-Hispanic black adults have the highest current and lietime asthma
prevalence at 10% and 16%, respectively as compared to the non-Hispanic white population at 7% and
12%, respectively (BRFSS DC, 2007). Non-Hispanic blacks appear to have a higher requency o doctor
visits and inhaler use than their non-Hispanic white counterparts. Te majority o asthma deaths oc-
cur in this population, accounting or 91% o asthma deaths rom 1999 to 2005. Similarly, Wards 7, 5and 8, which are predominantly (over 88%) non-Hispanic black, have the highest District-wide asthma
mortality rates.
Te signicant dierence in morality rates among non-Hispanic blacks and whites may be an indica-
tion o the increased severity among the black population. Tere is an approximately two old dierence
in prevalence (according to the 2005 BRFSS) o asthma among non-Hispanic blacks (10.4%) and whites
53
8. Conclusions
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
70/100
(6.6%) in the District. However, there is an almost ourold dierence in the mortality rate between the
two races. Tere are multiaceted actors that may be causing the increased severity among non-Hispanic
blacks: poor asthma management, complications with other respiratory diseases and environmental
triggers. However, all these actors are interconnected and linked to poor socioeconomic status. For
example, poor asthma management can be due to lack o knowledge and access to care, which in turn
can lead to poor overall health outcomes and possible complications with asthma and poor housing
situations can lead to high indoor pollution and exposure to indoor asthma triggers.
8.2. Populations with Low Socioeconomic StatusIn addition to black Non-Hispanics, populations with low socioeconomic status (populations with
a low household income and low education attainment) appear to be disproportionately aected by
asthma. Te current asthma prevalence rate was more than two times higher among households with
an income less than $15,000 as compared to those with an income above $75,000 (BRFSS DC, 2005).
Similarly, populations with less than a high school education had current asthma prevalence rates that
were two times higher than those with a college graduate education. Wards 7, 5 and 8, which have thehighest unemployment rate, highest Medicaid recipients, and lowest median income in the District,
also have the highest mortality rates.
8.3. ChildrenTe National Health Interview Survey 2005 reported that 6.5 million or 9% o US children (
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
71/100
8.5. Female PopulationDistrict emales (11%), 18 years, have a higher current asthma prevalence rate than males (7%).
Females, afer puberty, have a higher hospital ED visit rate than males. Among District adults with
current asthma, emales appear to receive the rst diagnosis o asthma at a later age (20-39 years) than
males, who are diagnosed at an earlier age (19 years). Tis data suggests that asthma intervention
programs need to target teenage and adult emales.
8.6. Populations with Other Risk FactorsFourteen percent (14%) o the Districts residents who are obese (BMI30) and 8% who are overweight
(25
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
72/100
8.7. Implications or Asthma ManagementAmong District adults with current asthma, it appears that asthma management can be improved. O
adults with current asthma, 45% reported having an asthma attack in the past twelve months, 30%
reported using an inhaler 1-4 times, and 9% reported using an inhaler ve or more times in the past
month to stop asthma episodes (DC BRFSS, 2005). In addition, 22% o the Districts adult residents
with current asthma reported having at least one day in the past twelve months when they were un-
able to carry out normal activities because o their asthma. Approximately 30% o adults with currentasthma reported not visiting the doctor or a routine asthma checkup in the past twelve months thus,
not managing their asthma through their primary care giver. Tis is according to the 2007 Asthma
National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines.
Tere are many obstacles that may impede residents with asthma rom managing their asthma
eciently. As indicated by this report, a majority o the Districts residents who are aected by asthma
are at-risk, i.e., the poor, children, and the elderly. In 2006, a study targeting these populations con-
ducted ocus groups in Wards 7 and 8 on health care and barriers to health care in the District.25 While
not specically related to asthma, the results can be translated to the asthma situation. Findings rom
the ocus groups echo what other research shows i.e., that many complex, interrelated barriers deterresidents rom accessing health care in general and rom receiving primary or preventive care. Tese
barriers include:
Lackofinsurance,limitednances,andschedulingconicts;
Fearandmistrustofthemedicalsystemfromlackofunderstandingof the importanceofprimary
care;
Negativeexperienceswiththemedicalsystem;and
Lackofknowledgeofthehealthcaresystemandneedforcare.
8.8. Work-Related AsthmaWork-related asthma has proven dicult to estimate in the District due to the lack o an active surveil-
lance system that is designed to capture WRA. Te George Washington University study has shown that
using worker compensation claims dataset alone underestimates the prevalence o work-related asthma.
8.9. Asthma and Environmental FactorsTere is an association between socioeconomic risk actors and environmental actors, as determined
by the Johns Hopkins University Ambient Air Study. Te wards with poorer socioeconomic status(Wards 5, 6, 7, & 8) and higher Medicaid enrollment tend to show the most signicant association with
air quality on asthma-related general acute care visits. Tereore, the socioeconomically disadvantaged
residents appear to be more susceptible to air pollutants which increase their asthma symptomology.
Although the study had limitations and urther research needs to be done, the results were consistent
with similar studies o asthma and air quality. Te results o this study (i.e., that ambient ozone has
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia56
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
73/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
74/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
75/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
Asthma represents a considerable burden on the District o Columbia. Despite some improvementsin asthma prevalence nationally, the District lags behind. Tere are many opportunities or improve-
ment, as evidenced by racial, socioeconomic, geographic disparities. Non-Hispanic blacks, low income
populations, the homeless population, residents in Wards 7, 8, and 6, young children (< 5 years), school-
aged children, middle aged adults (45-50), and the elderly subpopulations need specic attention when
considering the reduction o asthma prevalence, severity and mortality. Te reports ndings suggest
recommendations or improvement in asthma surveillance, management, health disparities and reduction
o risk actors and preventable events as outlined below.
9.1. Surveillance System
eDistrictofColumbianeedstoimproveitsabilitytocollectinformationonthenumberof
people with asthma in all District populations. Te District is an ethnically diverse population
with a large group o immigrants. However, data on the number o people with asthma or all sub-
groups (or example, immigrants, Hispanics, Asians etc.) are not available. Data on emergency
department (ED) visits are currently not available by race. Sucient data are also not available
at the level o geographic detail that would aid in planning eective asthma interventions (e.g.
wards, districts, school district levels etc.).
Smokingis theonlyasthmatrigger informationcollectedbytheBRFSS.Triggers intheworkplace, homes, and schools have not yet been developed into a questionnaire that can be distrib-
uted nor captured routinely by any other data system. Te District has many aging homes and
schools that may be sources o allergens. Data is needed on home, work and school environments,
and their health eects on the population. Tis data can be used to aid patients, health care pro-
viders, and asthma project programmers who may be able to eectively target asthma reduction
plans.
eDistrict lacksadequatework-relatedasthmadata.Currently,theDistrictrelieson theDC
Oce o Workers Compensation database to estimate work-related asthma. However, many sel-
employed workers including independent contractors, ederal employees, or railroad workers are
not covered by the state compensation claims oce. Tis underscores the need or developing a better
data collection methodology or work-related asthma in order to better estimate the prevalence
o WRA in the District. Tis may mean orging partnerships with stakeholders (DC Oce o
Workers Compensation, physicians, employers etc.) to establish an active data collection system.
Ourknowledgeofasthmamanagementcompletelyreliesonself-reportedsurveydataforadults.
Tere is limited inormation readily available in the District related to:
59
9. Recommendations
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
76/100
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
77/100
DCDOHshouldfundandconductoutreachprogramstoeducateemployersandemploy-
ees on the work place triggers o asthma.
isreportfoundthatahighproportionofobeseresidentsalsosuerfromasthma.Althoughthe
causal relationship between asthma and obesity is not clear, there is enough research to suggest
that obesity is a risk actor linked to asthma. Tereore, asthma reduction interventions need to
have a comprehensive ocus on improving the overall health o residents, and specically reducing
the obesity epidemic among children and adults as part o the asthma intervention strategy.
Preventionofsmokingaroundchildrenshouldbeanothercomponentof theasthmaprimary
prevention strategy. DC DOH and other asthma stakeholders should continue to educate parents
(especially those with a history o asthma), day care providers, and others who routinely deal with
young children on the dangers o second hand smoke.
9.4. Reducing Health Disparities
Tere are vast racial and socioeconomic disparities in asthma prevalence, emergency department vis-its, and mortality rates in the District. Eorts to reduce the burden o asthma in the District must ad-
dress this issue. Tereore:
DCDOHshouldidentifyandtargetresourcesincludingprogramsandactivitiestogeographic
areas and populations that are experiencing the highest burden o asthma.
Partnershipsandstrategicalliancesshouldbeforgedamongagenciesandorganizationsaddressing
asthma in order to access these populations. For example, racial and ethnic minorities constitute
more than hal o those who get their health care through Medicaid. Tereore, Medicaid should
be an active partner in addressing asthma in the District o Columbia.
Coalitionsandasthmastakeholdersneedtoevaluatetheircurrentprogramstoensuretheyareaccessing and reaching these populations eectively.
ProgramsshouldutilizeavailableDCDOHdata to target activities, setmeasurableprogram
goals, and routinely assess improvements.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia 61
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
78/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia62
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
79/100
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia
1 American Lung Association, Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Research and Program Services.
rends in Asthma Morbidity and Mortality; November 2007.
2 U.S. Department o Health and Human Services, National Institutes o Health, National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute. Guidelines or the Diagnosis and Management o Asthma, October
2007.
3 CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention(CDC),2003.
4 Akinbami LJ. Te State o Childhood Asthma, United States: 1980-2005, Advance Data rom Vi-
tal and Health Statistics: no 381, Revised December 29, 2006. Hyattsville, MD: National Center or
Health Statistics, 2006.
5 U.S. Department o Health and Human Services, National Institutes o Health, National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute; Data Fact Sheet: Asthma Statistics; January 1999.
6 U.S. Department o Health and Human Services, National Institutes o Health, National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute Data Fact Sheet: Asthma Statistics; January 1999.
7
American Lung Association; rends in Asthma Morbidity and Mortality; August 2007.
8 National Institutes o Health. News Release; NHLBI Reports New Asthma data or World Asthma
Day; 2001.
9 District o Columbia Oce o Planning. Census 2000 Data.
10 National Center or Health Statistics, Centers or Disease Control and Prevention,Morbidity and
Mortality Report. 2003.
11
Wright, A. Epidemiology o Asthma and Recurrent Wheeze in Childhood. Clinical Reviews inAllergy and Immunology: 2002; 22:33-44.
12 Friedman-Jimnez G, Beckett WS, Szeinuk J, Petsonk EL, Clinical Evaluation, Management, and
Prevention o Work-Related Asthma,American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2000; 37:121-141.
13 Department o Health and Human Services, Centers or Disease Control and Prevention, National
63
10. References
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
80/100
Institute or Occupational Saety and Health: Work-Related Lung Disease Surveillance Report, 2002.
14 Breedlove, J., Occupational Asthma is More Common in the District o Columbia than Represent-
ed
in Compensation Statistics, George Washington University Masters Tesis, 2006.
15 Eggleston PA, Buckley J, Breysse PN, Wills-Karp M, Kleeberger SR, Jaakkola JJK, Te Environmentaland Asthma in U.S. Inner Cities. Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements, Vol. 107, S3,
June 1999.
16 Diaz-Sanchez A, sien A, Casillas A, Dotson AR, Saxon A, Enhanced nasal cytokine production in
human beings afer in vivo challenge with diesel exhaust particles,Journal of Allergy and Clinical
Immunology, 1996; 98:114-123.
17 Rosenstreich DL, Eggleston P, Kattan M, Baker D, Slavin RG, Gergen P, Mitchell H, McNi-Mortimer
K, Lynn H, Ownby D, et al. Te role o cockroach allergy and exposure to cockroach allegen in
causing morbidity among inner-city children with asthma, New England Journal of Medicine,1997;336:1356-1363.
18 Department o Health and Human Services: National Asthma Education Program Expert Panel
Report: Guidelines or Diagnosis and Management o Asthma DHHS Publ. No 91-3042. Bethesda,
MD: 1991.
19 USEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,
20
Babin SM, Burkom HS, abernero N, Holtry R S, Ambient Air Quality and Medicaid PatientAsthma Data Summary Report or the Investigation o the Linkage between Ambient Air Quality
and Medicaid Patient Asthma Exacerbations in Washington, DC, Te Johns Hopkins University
Applied Physics Laboratory Report, 2006.
21 Ross M and Patrick K, Te Brookings Institute: A Policy Brie or the Medical Homes DC Area
Health Education Center Leaders Among Us: Developing a Community Health Worker Program
in Washington, DC, October 2006.
22 Shore SA, Fredberg JJ. Obesity, smooth muscle, and airway hyper responsiveness,Journal of
Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2005; 115:925- 927.
23 Strachan DP, Butland BK, Anderson HR, Incidence and prognosis o wheezing illness rom early
childhood to age 33 in a national British cohort. British Medical Journal, 1996; 312:1195 -1199.
24 Piipari R, Jaakkola JJk, Jaakkola N, Jaakkola MS., Smoking and asthma in adults, European
Respiratory Journal. 2004: 24: 734-739.
Burden o Asthma in the District o Columbia64
8/6/2019 District of Columbia Burden of Asthma Report
81/100
25 Ross, M and K Patrick, Te Brookings Institute Leaders Among Us: Developing a Community
Health Worker Program in Washington DC October 2006.
26 Weisel CP, RP Cody, and PJ Lioy, Relationship between summertime ambient ozone levels and
emergency department visits or asthma in central New Jersey. Environmental Health Perspectives,
1995: 103, 2: pp 97-102.
27 olbert, PE, Mulholland JA, Macintosh DL, Xu F, Daniels D, Devine OW, Carlin BP, Klein M, Dor-
ley J, Butler AJ, Nordenberg DF, Frumkin H, Ryan PB, and White, MC: Air quality and pediatric
emergency room visits or asthma in Atlanta, Georgia, American Journal of Epidemiolo