DUNE Architecture Considerations: Facilities,Infrastructure, and PracticalitiesTheresa ShawDAQ WorkshopOctober 31, 2017
Content• Dune Locations
- Above ground
- Underground
• Infrastructure and Detector Grounding Plan
• Detector Racks
• Power Envelopes
• Fiber Plant
• Central Utility Cavern Control Room Study
• Slow Control
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations2
Location
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations3
Location
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations4
Sanford Lab Homestake Visitor Center
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations5
The Yates Shaft
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations6
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations7
Small DAQ Control Room
Overall site layout
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations8
Ross ShaftYates Shaft
Underground Excavation
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations9
Infrastructure Grounding Plan
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations10
Infrastructure Grounding – Docdb 285
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations11
• Objectives
- To create an ‘isolated’ detector ground system consisting of the Cryostat (membrane and steel containment vessel), Detector Electronics racks (located on top of the cryostat) and the electronics resident in those racks or inside the vessel.
- This ‘isolation’ keeps building noise sources off of the detector’s sensitive electronics.
- A “safety” ground is implemented through a saturable inductor connecting the detector ground and “earth/building” ground. The inductor provides a DC path for fault currents and a resistive AC path for noise sources.
Infrastructure Grounding – Docdb 285
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations12
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations13
Location of DAQ equipment• Ideally, we would like to keep as many sources of fast switching
currents off detector ground.- Consider locating most DAQ electronics in the Central Utility Cavern
(CUC), where it will be distant and on “building” ground.
- Only Optical fiber connections between the CUC and the detector are allowed.
- There may have to be space/power/cooling trade-offs made between the CUC and detector racks.
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations14
Detector Racks
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations15
Racks• Rough Draft of POSSIBLE detector rack layouts – based off
emails and ProtoDUNE found in https://docs.dunescience.org:440/cgi-bin/ShowDocument?docid=4499
• Detector Racks will be (3 rows of 25) or (3 rows of 35); at least one rack per vertical APA pair feedthrough.
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations16
Detector Rack Cooling• Two options being looked at
- Air Cooling (fans)
- Water Cooling
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations17
One Rack per APA pair
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations18
Three Racks per 6 APAs
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations19
Power Envelopes
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations20
DUNE Power Requirement Envelope – Docdb 208
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations21
Detector Power
Small above ground control room
Possible onsite large above ground control room
Underground CUC Control Room
Fiber Plant
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations22
Fiber Optic Paths
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations23
Fiber Requirements – Docdb 112
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations24
Central Utility Cavern Control Room Study
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations25
LBNF/DUNE Control Room Study Workshop on Dec 15-16, 2015 • Report from Workshop https://docs.dunescience.org:440/cgi-
bin/RetrieveFile?docid=937
Conclusions and RecommendationsFrom the workshop and information provided, the team has established designboundaries and room functions for the control facilities. The originalrequirements were developed into representative layouts to be further developedthe design team. The surface or underground control facility has different driversand it is considered that the underground control facility is the initial priority as itwill be needed to commission the experiment. Whereas the surface is envisionedas a more accessible and long term solution. The final desk configuration shouldnot be determined until the technology is chosen.
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations26
Control Room Study Workshop• Starting Point
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations27
Underground Control Room Study Workshop
• Results of Workshop identified 5 area types (Not all these spaces were later translated into Requirements!)- Control Space
- Conference/Meeting Space
- DAQ Space
- Flexible/Temporary Workspace
- Eating Facility
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations28
Control Space
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations29
Conference/Meeting Space
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations30
DAQ Space
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations31
Flexible/Temporary Workspace and Eating Facility
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations32
What was Translated into Engineering Requirements
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations33
• NOTE: Not all spaces identified from Workshop were translated into requirements
• https://docs.dunescience.org:440/cgi-bin/ShowDocument?docid=112
Slow Control
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations34
DAQ Requirements – Docdb 112
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations35
Slow Control and Monitoring Functions included in DAQ scope. Lots of issues here as well:Equipment location, power, grounding, low noise …
Conclusion• Lots of work to be done defining details as the DAQ design
matures!
31OCT2017 T. Shaw | DUNE Architecture Considerations36