8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
1/12
Earthquake mitigation: Using
Active dampers & other devices
Supervised under,Prof. Girish Kumar
Presented by,
Vidushi Jain(05004011)
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
2/12
Abstract
The control of structural vibrations produced by earthquake or wind can be done by various
means such as modifying rigidities, masses, damping, or shape, and by providing passive or
active counter forces. Flexible structures may fall victim to excessive levels of vibration underthe action of wind, earthquake, adversely affecting service ability and occupant comfort. To
ensure the functional performance of flexible structures, various design modifications are
possible, ranging from alternative structural systems to the utilization of passive and active
control devices. This paper presents an overview of state-of-the-art measures to reduce
structural response of buildings using active control devices.
Introduction
Natural Disasters & Calamities like earthquake causes widespread destruction, deaths and
damage to property and infrastructure We can not avoid such natural calamities but by
monitoring their upcoming and subsequently implementing effective measures, we can reduce
their vicious effect. Engineering structures like dams, bridges and sky high buildings are the
key factors of development. The race toward new heights has not been without its challenges.
Despite engineers put all their efforts to ensure safety of a structure, some time these
structures undergo large deformation due to calamities like earthquake which results in their
collapse and loss of lives and property
As a measure of earthquake mitigation we apply following way: changing rigidity, mass,
damping, shape, or applying passive or active control forces. Following are the facts related to
various measures adopted by different countries in the direction of earthquake mitigation:
> 20 full scale active control appl. in Japan
Passive base isolation used in USA.
Recently rapid developments have been occurring in the area of controlled civil
structures, including full-scale implementations, actuator types and characteristics, and
trends toward the incorporation of more modern algorithms and technologies
The use of control and automation has proven to be very successful in mitigating the
effects of dynamic forces like earthquake and wind forces
Structure is considered as a system by identifying the equations governing the dynamic
properties of the system. On the basis of mathematical modeling of the system is done
Following is system Analysis terminology
System - Plant or Process
Excitation - Input signal
Response - Output signal
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
3/12
Mathematical model of structure
A simple building can be converted into a spring mass system as follows:
In the simplified model, the masses correspond to slab masses and stiffness correspond to
column stiffness (i.e, the force required per unit lateral displacement of column)
Uncontrolled system
Controlled system
Open-loop
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
4/12
Damping Sources
An increase in the effective damping of a structure, accomplished by any of the four major
sources of damping: structural, aerodynamic, soil, and auxiliary, will also lead to decreased
structural motion. Structural damping is limited to the damping already available inherently inthe materials: steel, concrete, or their composite. At times, aerodynamic damping may also
contribute in the along wind direction, depending on the wind velocity, structural shape, and
building dynamic characteristics. However, the contribution in the across wind direction is
negligible and may even become adverse at higher wind speeds, though the presence of
adjacent structures may introduce different effects. Although not marked for high rise
buildings, damping contributions may also be obtained from the soil-foundation interaction,
i.e. soil damping. Unfortunately, these three forms of damping make only limited
contributions. In addition, the damping in the structure cannot be engineered like the mass and
stiffness properties of the structure, nor can it be accurately estimated until the structure is
completed, resulting a certain level of uncertainty (Kareem & Gurley 1996). In cases where
the inherent damping is not sufficient, auxiliary damping devices may be introduced, offeringa somewhat more predictable, adaptable, and reliable method of imparting additional damping
to a system.
Various types of controlled system
Active Structural Control: Active control systems operate by using external energy
supplied by actuators to impart forces on the structure.An active control system is one
in which an external source powers control actuator(s) that apply forces to the
structure in a prescribed manner. These forces can be used to both add and dissipateenergy in the structure. In an active feedback control system, the signals sent to the
control actuators are a function of the response of the system measured with physical
sensors (optical, mechanical, electrical, chemical, and so on.
Active control:
Active control systems are those that employ large actuators that directly input forces into the
structure in an attempt to limit structural deflections.
The goal is to design a control system to keep stresses/strains/displ./accel. (calledoutputs) at certain locations below specified bounds (peak, rms) when disturbances
(wind, earthquake) below specified bound are applied.
Designer decides choice of outputs based on comfort (e.g. accelerations) and safety
(e.g. stresses).
Hybrid Structural Control Systems: A hybrid control system is typically defined as
one which employs a combination of two or more passive or active devices.The
common usage of the term "hybrid control" implies the combined use of active and
passive control systems. For example, a structure equipped with distributed visco-
elastic damping supplemented with an active mass damper on or near the top of the
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
5/12
structure, or a base isolated structure with actuators actively controlled to enhance
performance.
Hybrid control:
Uses active & passive devices. Advantages of both active and passive systems are present and their limitations are
reduced.
Essentially an active control system
Examples: viscous damping with AMD, base isolation with actuators, TMD+AMD).
Passive Control: A passive control system does not require an external power source.
Passive control devices impart forces that are developed in response to the motion of
the structure. The energy in a passively controlled structural system, including the
passive devices, cannot be increased by the passive control devices.
Passive control:
No external power is required for these systems
They work on simple mass stiffness relationship
Here a mass is provided with the mass of building.
Passive control device (TMD, Base Isolator) imparts forces that are developed directly
as a result of motion of structure (i.e., no actuator involved).
Total energy (structure + passive device) cannot increase, hence inherently stable. Relatively inexpensive.
Reliable during earthquake
Not as effective as active, hybrid, semi-active control.
Types of passive control devices
Metallic Device:-Basic principle behind Metallic yield damper is that the metallic
device deforms plastically, thus dissipating vibratory energy. Used in earthquake
applications.
Friction devices: here friction between sliding faces is used to dissipate energy. When
used in base isolation systems, the friction coefficient has conflicting requirements. Itshould not be too large otherwise shear forces from ground during a strong earthquake
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
6/12
will transmit to the structure. Also it should not be too small or the entire structure will
move due to small/medium wind/earthquake loads. These devices can also be fitted
between two storeys to damp their relative motion. Used in earthquake applications.
Viscous/ Viscoelastic devices: A typical example of it is fluid in a cylinder with
piston having an orifice. These can also be semi-active (eg., variable orifice, variable
viscosity). Used in earthquake and wind applications. Tuned mass dampers:TMD, usually having mass about 1% that of structure, fitted
to top of building. It is tuned to reduce vibration for given frequency range. It absorber
mass takes up vibratory energy, leaving the main mass (building) almost static. Main
system properties (stiffness-k1, mass-m1) known, absorber system properties
(stiffness-k2, mass-m2) to be designed such that absorber frequency equals excitation
frequency (w2=w). Not very useful for earthquake excitations which occur over wide
frequency range. Main problems is that the size of the mass to be used and its
displacement relative to the structure, in order that damping is effective.
Some other Dampers are liquid sloshing dampers, Impact dampers.
Semi-Active Structural Control Systems: Semi-active control systems need lesser
energy than active control systems. They do not add any mechanical energy to the
system.Semi-active control systems are a class of active control systems for which the
external energy requirements are orders of magnitude smaller than typical active
control systems. Typically, semi-active control devices do not add mechanical energy
to the structural system (including the structure and the control actuators), therefore
bounded-input bounded-output stability is guaranteed. Semiactive control devices are
often viewed as controllable passive devices.
Semi-active control:
Uses devices where input power requirements are orders of magnitude less than fully
active devices. In fact in some cases battery power is sufficient.
These devices usually dont add energy to the system, hence stability ensured.
These devices can be viewed as controllable passive devices (eg., Magneto-
Rheological Fluid damper where voltage input applied to change viscosity depending
on motion measured by sensors, variable orifice damper, controllable friction devices,
Variable stiffness devices).
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
7/12
Figure 10: Schematic of various auxiliary damping devices utilizing inertial effects.
(Con: controller, a: actuator, Ex: excitation, S: sensor)
Active Dampers
In the quest to control the vibration of structures, passive control had originally been favored
for its simplicity and reliability - the devices remained functional without an external power
source and posed no significant risk of generating an unstable situation. Still, without the use
of control mechanisms, the devices were incapable of adjusting to a variation in any
parameters of the system.
Clearly, more efficient and swifter control could be obtained from a system with the ability to
respond to changes - hence, active control emerged, producing smaller devices that were
capable of controlling the vibration of structural systems. This aim is accomplished through
the use of hydraulic or electro-mechanical actuator systems driven by an appropriate controlalgorithm, such as: closed loop or feedback, in which the control forces are determined by the
feedback response of the structure, open loop or feedforward, in which the control forces are
determined by measured external excitations, or closed-open loop or feedforward-feedback, in
which the control forces are determined by both measured response of the structure and
measured external excitation. Active systems include active mass drivers, active variable
stiffness systems (AVS), active tendon control systems, active gyro stabilizers (AGS), active
aerodynamic appendages, and active pulse control systems.
An active damping method for a stabilized mirror, and a corresponding active damper
apparatus, comprising providing a tachometer measuring speed of a motor driving the mirror,employing compensation electronics receiving input from said tachometer and the motor, and
employing drive electronics providing output to the motor.
Working principle of an active device :
It uses hydraulic or electro-mechanical actuator systems driven by an appropriate control
algorithm. By this algorithm it generates a control force proportional to the velocity. It
makes the moving mass of the actuator move to counteract the motion of the floor. The
system is optimized such that the motor can be driven with a sinusoidal force where the
peak force is at or near the full motor capacity at any frequency without exceeding the
stroke while maintaining a simple and cost effective controller a relationship between thefundamental natural frequency of the floor system and actuator is established to provide
efficient and stable control.
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
8/12
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
9/12
Applause Tower
Osaka Prefecture (Completed in 1992)
Design: Takenaka Corporation
Total Floor Space:96,793 m2Number of floors: 3 below ground, 34 above ground
Structural control device: AMD, mass weight 480t
(Utilizing a heliport)
Object: Suppression of building vibration in strong winds or
medium/small earthquakes
(Parallel movements in two directions)
AMD using a rooftop heliport
The rooftop heliport, supported on multistage rubber bearings, can be used as weight for
AMD. The size of this weight is the largest in the world.In addition, there is a large-scale experimental frame to ascertain the durability and reliability
of AMD at the Takenaka Research & Development Institute where the effects of AMD can be
experienced.
Pros and cons of active dampers
Advantages over other dampers
It provides efficient and stable control with the change in properties of structure.
It absorbs vibration and helps us in designing an earthquake-resistant structure which
suppresses the vibration itself.
Disadvantages
An active control system is a much more complex system than the
passive control system
An active Damper adds energy to the system thus many civil structures (without
control) which are stable may get destabilized with active control.
They are very expensive systems to design and are expensive to operate due to the
large amounts of power they need.
Active device is larger in size in comparison with passive device so it occupies more
power with respect to a passive device
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
10/12
Semi Active DevicesAbstract Control devices can be used in civil structures to dissipate energy from earthquakes,
reduce structural damage and prevent failure. Semi-active control devices have been shown to
be more energy-efficient than active devices and more effective in reducing seismic structural
vibrations than passive devices.A type of semi-active control device, the magnetorheological (MR) damper, consists of a
hydraulic cylinder containing micron-sized, magnetically polarizable particles suspended in a
liquid such as water, glycol, mineral or synthetic oil. The damping capabilities of this device
can be quickly varied by changing the viscosity of the MR fluid from viscous to semi-solid
through the introduction of a magnetic field. The objective of this research is to develop a
fuzzy controller to regulate the damping properties of the MR damper. Because fuzzy control
uses expert knowledge instead of differential equations, it allows for the development of
simple algorithms. It does not require accurate information on structural and vibration
characteristics of the system and is therefore an attractive alternative for complex and/or
nonlinear systems. Introduction Civil structures have very little damping and are therefore
susceptible to dynamic loading such as those caused by intense winds or earthquakes. Control
devices are often used to reduce structural damage and prevent failure. Passive controllers,
such as tuned mass dampers and base-isolation dissipate incoming energy from the system
and since they require no power to operate, are very reliable systems. Active controllers, such
as active tendons and active tuned mass dampers, are able to dissipate energy and/or exert a
required force to the structure. They do however require a large amount of energy to operate
and since they insert energy into the system, they have the ability to destabilize it. Semi-active
controllers have been shown to be more energy-efficient than active devices and more
effective in reducing seismic structural vibrations than passive devices. They require little
power for operation, being able to run on battery power, and since they do not inject energy
into the system, they guarantee stability:
(b)
a) Kyobashi Siewa Building and (b) its AMD unit: (c)performance of structure under wind.(taken from
Application of vibration control structure system: AMD
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
11/12
Kajima Corporation
In brief :
Semi-active control falls between passive & active on the control spectrum.
In a semi-active control system actuators operating on external power are used but
they do not add energy to the structure.
The actuators are used to control or assist a passive control device.
Benefits :
The actuator used does not require large amounts of external power.
Semi-active systems are more aggressive than passive systems
Obtain control results close to that of an active control system.
An active variable stiffness system as well as the active variable damping system is
considered semi-active system.
Conclusions
Earthquakes represent the single largest potential cause of casualties and damage from
a natural hazard. Every year we face lot of devastation and loss of infrastructure as
well as lives due to it. Thus earthquake mitigation has become very important
For earthquake mitigation civil engineers apply various ways like: changing rigidity,
mass, damping, shape, or applying passive or active control forces to lesson the
vicious effect of earthquakes. Installation of active dampers in large civil structures is
one of the effective measure to lessen this devastation
8/7/2019 Earthquake Mitigation Using Active Dampers
12/12
In active mass dampers designer decides choice of outputs based on comfort (e.g.
accelerations) and safety (e.g. stresses)(By providing certain algorithm) we can change
the criteria of output force according to the place and properties of the building.
Although very effective in controlling vibrations in any civil structure, active dampers
are less popular. Major cause of this is its high installation and maintenance cost.
Moreover it needs power supply and its power consumption is very high Passive dampers are not so effective in controlling vibrations but as they are economic
they can be used in the places having less threat of earthquake
Semi active device is the best alternative. It doesnt consume energy and at the same
time it is approximately equally effective in controlling vibrations caused by
earthquake.
References http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6874748.html
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gsapp/BT/BSI/TMD/tmd.html
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/6739/18043/00837479.pdf?arnumber=837479
http://www.takenaka.co.jp/takenaka_e/quake_e/seishin/seishin.htm
Special Thanks to Luv Doshi for his notes