UnivCHE PITTS
Rober
Adviso
versiEVRON
SBURGH,
rt Mrosk
or: Dr. Ch
ty of N ANN
, PENNS
key | Con
himay Anu
PittsbNEX
SYLVANI
nstructio
umba
burgh
IA
on Optio
h T S
2
on
Technic Septemb
2011
Photo
cal Rep
ber 23
o Courtesy of BurConstr
ort 1
rchick ruction
EXECU
The purpAnnex pra renovatthree storpenthousfloors.
The lab spstate-of-thsystems rmajority o
The projecontracts Constructthe projecphase of tschedule arrived fo
The verticstructure columns, slab was nminimal sequipmenyards norThere wa
The Chevnumber omajority o
Researchschedulesaffect the Technical
TIVE SUM
ose of Technroject. The prtion and an adry addition, ce. The addit
paces will behe-art laborarequired exteof the MEP sy
ect was broke being awardtion as their Cct was startedthe project w of the projecor classes.
cal addition o of the Audito each with a fneeded to drspace aroundnt and site trarthwest of the
as a small lot t
vron Annex isof the points iof their point
h of this projes involved. I project’s exel Report 2.
MMARY
nical Report 1roject is locaddition to theconsisting of tion will tie in
e occupied byatory equipmensive coordystems relate
en into eight ded in NovemCM Agent to d in late Nove
was sequencect was import
of the Ashe Aorium was nofoundation syrill the piles ad the project,ailers. In orde building anto the west of
s in pursuit ofin question. Ts coming fro
ct will continImportant attrecution will a
Architec
is to becomeated in Pittsbue University’stwo floors of
nto the existin
y the Universent, the MEPination of the
ed to the lab s
packages anmber 2009. A overlook all ember 2009 a
ed in during ttant because
Auditorium prot capable of ystem compoand form new which made
der to solve thnd the materiaf the building
f a LEED GoldThe project tm the Sustain
nue throughouributes of thealso be analy
tural Enginee
e acquaintedurgh, Pennsys Chevron To laboratory spng Chevron T
sity’s Chemis system is ex
e trades to enspace is loca
nd was compeAdditionally, of the work iand completethe first phase the addition
resents a fewsupporting th
osed of pile cw foundationse it difficult tohis problem, al storage wag that was use
d rating. Theteam is utilizinable Sites an
ut the year, we schedule anyzed. This inf
Universit
ering | Septe
d with the Uniylvania and isower and Ashpace and one
Tower, east o
stry Departmxtremely comnable the proated on the 4th
etitively bid the Universitinvolved withed the followe and finishe
n needed to b
w difficulties fhe addition; t
caps and micrs to support to provide ade the site trail
as located 10ed to locate t
e checklist ising the entirend Indoor En
with a concennd key buildiformation and
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
iversity of Pits a two phasehe Auditoriume story for a m
of the addition
ment. Since thmplex. The cooject to finish
h floor of the
in Septembety chose to hih the project.
wing Decembed in Septembbe completed
for the projecthus resultingropiles. Demthe new columequate spaceers were loca
00 yards norththe heavy eq
s currently une LEED-NC chnvironmental
ntration on thing system cod research ca
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 2
ttsburgh’s Che project consm. The additimechanical n, on each of
he project coomplexity of on schedule addition.
er 2009, with tire Mascaro . The first ph
ber. The secober 2011. Th
d before the s
ct team. The g in the need
molition of themns. There w
e for materialated roughlyh of the build
quipment.
nder review whecklist, with Quality secti
he costs and osts and howan be found i
on Annex t Mroskey
hevron sisting of ion is a
f the new
onsists of these
e. The
the
hase of ond he students
existing d for new e existing was also ls, y 200 ding.
with a h a ions.
w they in
TABLE
Executive
Table of C
Project Sc
Founda
Structu
Buildin
Finish .
Building S
Demoli
Structu
Cast-in
Mechan
Electric
Masonr
Curtain
Suppor
Project C
R.S. Me
R.S. Me
Compa
Existing C
Local Con
Client Inf
Project D
Staffing P
OF CONT
e Summary ...
Contents ......
chedule Sum
ation .............
ural ...............
ng Enclosure/
....................
Systems Sum
ition .............
ural Steel Fram
n-Place Concr
nical System
cal System ...
ry .................
n Wall ...........
rt of Excavati
ost Evaluatio
eans Costwor
eans Costwor
arison of Cos
Conditions ...
nditions ........
formation ......
elivery Syste
Plan ...............
TENTS
....................
....................
mary ...........
....................
....................
/Shell ...........
....................
mmary ...........
....................
me ...............
rete .............
...................
....................
....................
....................
ion ...............
on .................
rks Square Fo
rks Assembly
ts .................
....................
....................
....................
em ................
....................Architec
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
oote Estimate
y Estimate ....
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................tural Enginee
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
e ..................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Universit
ering | Septe
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 3
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
on Annex t Mroskey
............ 2
............ 3
............ 5
............ 5
............ 5
............ 5
............ 6
............ 7
............ 7
............ 7
............ 8
............ 9
............ 9
.......... 10
.......... 10
.......... 11
.......... 12
.......... 13
.......... 13
.......... 13
.......... 15
.......... 16
.......... 17
.......... 18
.......... 19
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
x A – Project
x B.1 – Square
x B.2 – Assem
x C – Overall
x D – Steel Ph
x E – Terra C
Schedule Sum
e Foot Estima
mbly Estimate
l Site Layout P
hase Sequenc
otta Facade P
Architec
mmary .........
ate Summary
e Summary ...
Plan..............
cing ..............
Phase Sequen
tural Enginee
....................
y ...................
....................
....................
....................
ncing ...........
Universit
ering | Septe
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 4
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
on Annex t Mroskey
.......... 21
.......... 22
.......... 26
.......... 27
.......... 28
.......... 30
PROJEC
The projeconstructThe sched
Pre Con Tur
In additiowere also
FOUNDA
The foundare to supaccommodemolishsupport atemporar
STRUCT
The strucThe structhe detailschedule with the c
BUILDIN
The buildsystems ain this tasactivity onneeded to
CT SCHED
ect schedule ion for the Chdule is divide
construction nstruction rnover/Comm
on to these thro considered
ATION
dation for thepport the newodate these phed. Additiona 1’-2” thick cry shoring inv
TURAL
tural system tural activitieling and firep for the comp
construction o
NG ENCLO
ding’s façade are included sk is the extern the scheduo be done.
DULE SUM
summary thahevron Anneed into three
missioning
ree sections;.
e Chevron Anw columns anpile caps, the nally, the gradcast-in-place volved with th
for the addites of the scheproofing invopletion of the of this buildin
OSURE/SHE
is a combina under the “Brior sheathing
ule because o
Architec
MMARY
at can be founex. The key m main section
; the foundati
nnex is compnd are located existing floode beams are concrete wahe excavatio
ion includes edule also incolved with the steel erectiong.
ELL
ation of terra Building Enclog and vapor
of the comple
tural Enginee
nd in Appendmilestone andns:
ion, structura
osed of pile cd inside the e
or and steppee located in thll. The found
on for the grad
steel beams clude the inste steel. A milon. This mile
cotta, metal osure/Shell”barrier for th
exity of the ex
Universit
ering | Septe
dix A illustratd phasing rel
al, building e
caps and stepexisting Asheed slabs in thhe northwest
dation work ade beams an
and columnstallation of thlestone activ
estone portray
panels, louve task in the su
he exterior ofxterior façade
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
tes the majorlationships a
nclosure/she
pped grade be auditoriums
he auditoriumt corner of th
also includes nd foundation
s, as well as che steel deck vity is also incys a significa
ers and glaziummary schef the buildinge systems an
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 5
r phases of re also indica
ell and finish
beams. The s. In order to
m needed to bhe building an the soil naili
n walls.
composite ste and slabs, as
cluded in theant event invo
ing. All of theedule. Also ig. This task ind the amoun
on Annex t Mroskey
ated.
sections
pile caps o be nd ing and
eel deck. s well as olved
ese included s a long
nt of work
FINISH
The finish“Interiorssuch as dlonger ac
Overall, tauditoriumwith the afinished O
For the co
hes involved s” task in the rywall, ceilin
ctivities includ
the total projem renovation
auditorium wOctober 14, 2
omplete Gan
in the in the c summary sch
ng finishes, flded in the sc
ect duration in and a verticas completed
2011.
tt Chart Summ
Architec
construction hedule. Somooring, archi
chedule due t
is 486 days. cal addition ad on Decemb
mary Schedu
tural Enginee
of the Chevrme of the item
itectural millwto the time an
This durationabove the audber 31, 2010 a
ule, please re
Universit
ering | Septe
ron Annex arms included in
work, etc. Thnd care need
n is split into ditorium. Thand the vertic
efer to Appen
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
e summarizen the interiorhis task is an
ded for these
two phases te renovationcal addition i
ndix A.
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 6
ed under the rs task are actnother one of activities.
that consistedn and work inis expected t
on Annex t Mroskey
tivities the
d of the nvolved to be
BUILDI
DEMOL
The first pTower’s lmajor demroom for of walls fo
STRUCT
The majoare used A composover 3 or the deck shaped bon the buframes anshown be
ING SYSTE
ITION
phase of the Aobby. In ordmolition that beam and coor new openi
TURAL STE
rity of the Anthroughout thsite deck is p more spans and is to hav
beams and couilding. Sheand are absorbelow:
EMS SUMM
YES
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Annex consisder to do this was necessa
olumn penetrings to tie int
EL FRAME
nnex’s structuhe new addit
placed on theand ranges fr
ve a strength olumns, as wear loads rangibed by large
Architec
MARY
NO
X
sts of renovat, there was se
ary includes drations, remoo to the exist
E
ure consists otion. The W s
e steel to distrfrom 1-1/2” toof 4,000 psi a
ell as HSS croing from 50 K
e footings. A
tural Enginee
W
D
Structu
Cast-In
Prec
Mech
Elec
C
Suppo
ting the existelective demdemolishing
oving the flooting Chevron
of structural sshaped steel ribute the loao 2” in thicknafter 28 days.oss braces areK to 100K are portion of on
Universit
ering | Septe
Work Scope
Demolition
ural Steel Fra
n-Place Conc
cast Concrete
hanical Syste
ctrical System
Masonry
Curtain Wall
ort of Excavat
ting Ashe Audmolition that h holes in bloc
or and steppen Tower.
steel. A comb is ASTM A99ads from the ness. Normal. Additionalle used to hel experienced
ne of the brac
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
ame
crete
e
em
m
tion
ditorium, as whad to be perck walls and ted slabs, and
bination of W92, with a yie building. Thl weight concly, a braced flp resist the ld at the basesced frames us
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 7
well as the Crformed. Somthe roof deck demolishing
W and HSS secld strength o
he deck is concrete is placeframe consistateral loads is of the bracesed on this p
on Annex t Mroskey
Chevron me of the k to make g portions
ctions of 50ksi. ntinuous ed over ting of W imposed ed
project is
CAST-IN
Cast-in-pcaps, grathe concrexisting sin depth. generator
N-PLACE C
lace concreteade beams, slrete used on tslab on grade Stepping grr room.
CONCRETE
e was also uslab on gradethe project ises and stepperade beams a
Figure 2 R
Architec
E
sed throughos, slab on de
s to be in acced slabs, withand mat slabs
Figure 1 Str
Rebar & Formwo
tural Enginee
out the constrcks all requirordance withh the thicknes were also u
ructural Steel Br
ork for Concrete
Universit
ering | Septe
ruction of the red the use oh ACI 318. Piess of these pused to suppo
raced Frame
e Wall at Genera
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
Chevron Anof cast-in-placile caps were
pile caps rangort concrete w
ator Room
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 8
nnex. Footersce concrete. e placed in thging from 24”walls for the
on Annex t Mroskey
s, pile All of he ” to 60”
MECHA
Three newTwo of theof the newfloor. All systems.
Additionasized to pwhile the level and
ELECTR
The electgeneratorvoltage o208Y/120amps, 480specified480Y/277floors thro
ANICAL SYS
w air handline units (AHU-w floors. The three of thes
ally, three labprovide 50% other fan is i
d are enclosed
RICAL SYST
rical system r. The distribf 400 volts th
0 volts throug0/277 volts th
d for this job i7 V. Additionoughout the p
STEM
ng units will s-1, 2) will ser
e third unit (Ase units are d
boratory exhof the designin standby md by louvers.
TEM
for the Chevbution transfo
hrough three pgh three phashrough threes located at t
nally, multipleproject.
Architec
supply the nerve the chemAHU-3) will sedesigned as h
aust fans aren flow rate. T
mode. These f. Two of the t
ron Annex coormer for thisphases and t
ses and four w phases and
the northweste panelboard
Figure 3
tural Enginee
ew addition amical lab and a
ervice the Asheating-cooli
used to remTwo of the fanfans are locatthree exhaus
onsists of trans project has hree wires. T
wires. Additifour wires plt corner of th
ds of differen
Laboratory Exh
Universit
ering | Septe
and are locateadministratio
she Lobby infing, single du
move any fumens operate in ted in the soust fans are sho
nsformers, sws a maximum The secondaionally, the mlus a ground.he building annt ratings and
haust Fans
ty of Pittsbur
ember 23, 20
ed on the newon areas, whifill area locatuct, variable
es from the la parallel undutheast corneown below:
witchboards rating of 300
ary voltage fomain switchbo. The emergend delivers 1
d sizes are loc
rgh – ChevroRobert
011 | 9
w penthouse ich are locateted on the gro volume rehe
ab areas. Eader normal oper of the pent
and an emer0kVA with a por the transfooard consistsency genera1500 kW of pcated on each
on Annex t Mroskey
level. ed on two ound
eat
ach fan is peration, thouse
rgency primary rmer is
s of 1600 tor that is ower at h of the
MASON
The Chevsystem asframing ginch high
The instalattached angles anthis, vertiFinally, thA section
CURTAI
A majoritis 7-1/4” include cglass, 1” system to
NRY
vron Annex ds one of the fagirt system, rih tiles of vario
llation of thisto the exterio
nd then 8” lonical profiles mhe tiles are pu
n view of the e
IN WALL
y of the buildthick and is clear insulatinthick insulate
o help accent
did not includaçade systemigid insulatio
ous lengths to
system takeor face of theng angles aremade of alumut in place anentire terra c
ding’s facadecomposed of ng glass, traned metal pan to the curtain
Architectu
de any traditioms. This systeon and clay tio help break
s time and co building. N
e attached to minum are fasnd attached wcotta system i
e is covered w three types o
nslucent spannels and 8” exn wall.
Figure 4 Sectio
ural Engineer
onal masonryem is a total oles. The clay up the look o
onsists of a feext, rigid ins the horizonta
stened to the with clips to kis shown belo
with an alumiof glazing tha
ndrel glass anxtruded alum
on View of Terra
Universit
ring | Septem
y work; howeof 6 inches, wy tiles used aof the façade
ew detailed ssulation is plaal angles at p 8” angles ankeep them heow:
inum curtain at are each annd opaque sp
minum sunsha
a Cotta System
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
ever, it did uswhich consistare a combina.
steps. First, aaced betweenpredeterminend are spacedeld in place a
wall system.n inch thick.
pandrel glassades are used
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 10
se a clay tile ts of an alumiation of six an
a horizontal an the horizoned locations. d accordinglyand uniformly
The overall The glass tys. In additiond throughout
on Annex t Mroskey
veneer inum nd twelve
angle is ntal After y. y spaced.
l system ypes n to the the
SUPPOR
Although needed tonails were
RT OF EXC
the project do be supporte drilled and
CAVATION
did not required. This was
d installed, fo
Architectu
re a large ams accomplishellowed by Sh
Figure
Figure 6
ural Engineer
mount of excaed by using t
hotcrete to he
5 Curtain Wall S
6 Soil Nail and Sh
Universit
ring | Septem
avation, the ethe method oelp support th
System
hotcrete
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
excavation thof soil nailinghe excavatio
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 11
at was perforg. Roughly 19n.
on Annex t Mroskey
rmed 9 soil
PROJEC
The figuresubcontrathe time o
Bid Pack
A - Site/S
B - Roofin
D - Curta
E - Gener
F - Plumb
G - Fire P
H - HVAC
J - Electr
Referringoverall colaboratoraddition band foundareas withThe largein the figuincreasinrenovatio
FurthermMeans Coreference
CT COST E
es below dispactors’ bids tof the bid ope
kage
Structure
ng
ainwall
ral Trades
bing
Protection
C
ical
g to figure 7, tonstruction cory spaces. A because therdations, withoh numerous m
e amount of cure above. Fg the cost of
on square foo
more, an analyostworks refee and are des
EVALUAT
play cost estio construct thening in Sept
Contracto
Burchick
Stringert
Southwest
Burchick
SSM
Alliance
SSM
Lighthous
the site & struost. This is bvertical addi
re are more vout interruptimechanical connections a
Finally, the in the general c
otage was not
ysis of the coserences. Bothscribed in the
Figure
Architectu
ION
imate values he Chevron Atember 2009
or
t
se
ucture, generbecause the Aition’s structuvariables invoing the space
connections tand equipmenterior finisheconstruction t included in
st of construch, an assembe sections be
e 7 Building Con
ural Engineer
produced byAnnex. The v and may hav
Avg. Bid
$ 5,750
$ 250
$ 1,000
$ 4,750
$ 1,250
$ 375
$ 4,500
$ 2,500
$ 20,375
ral trades anAnnex is a veure is more eolved such ases below. Ado help keep nt increases t
es and exterio involved with the calculatio
ction for the Cbly and squarelow.
struction Estima
Universit
ring | Septem
y Burchick Cvalues of eacve fluctuated
%
0,000 28
0,000 1.
0,000 4.
0,000 23
0,000 6.
5,000 1.
0,000 22
0,000 12
5,000
d hvac all cartical additio
expensive to cs supporting dditionally, tthe area as futhe overall por facades arh the projecton for the cos
Chevron Annre foot estima
ate by Bid Packa
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
Construction, ch bid packagd since then.
% of Building
8.2%
2%
9%
3.3%
1%
8%
2.1%
2.3%
rry a significon with state-construct tha the structure
the laboratorume and dus
price of the hvre unique andt. (It is imporst per square
nex was perfoate were prod
age
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 12
along with fige were reco
g Cost/SF
$ 164
$
$ 28
$ 135
$ 35
$ 10
$ 128
$ 7
$ 582
cant amount oof-the-art che
an a horizontae with new coy space inclut free as possvac systems, d elegant, thurtant to note te foot.)
ormed using duced using
on Annex t Mroskey
ve other orded at
F
4.29
7.14
8.57
5.71
5.71
0.71
8.57
1.43
2.14
of the emical al olumns udes lab sible. as shown us that the
the R.S. this
R.S. ME
Due to theR.S. Meanthat incluas a colleclosest ty
Refer to Aestimate.
R.S. ME
Similar toCostworksestimatinassemblie
Refer to Aestimate.
COMPA
Each typeThe total
The squarthe cost odifferencetype was for a one
ANS COST
e difficulty anns Costworks ded a renova
ege laboratorype of buildin
Appendix B.1
ANS COST
o the square fks reference. g method. Tes to choose
Appendix B.2
ARISON OF
e of estimate costs varied
T
re foot estimaof constructioes were note referenced a story laborat
TWORKS SQ
nd complexreference. Wation to the lory with face bng descriptio
for a more d
TWORKS A
foot estimate, A more accuhe estimate w from to best
2 for a more d
F COSTS
was compare greatly as sh
Type of Est
ActuaSquare FAssemb
ate producedon summarizeed. The first das a college ltory space. T
Architectu
QUARE FO
xity of this proWith that saidower levels. brick and a co
n the referen
detailed brea
ASSEMBLY
, the assemblurate buildingwas more acc model the bu
detailed brea
ed to one anohown in the fi
timate To
al $ Foot $bly $
d using the R.ed in figure 7difference belaboratory, bThis poses a p
ural Engineer
OOT ESTIM
oject, it is toud, the Chevro Using the Cooncrete bricknce provided
akdown of the
ESTIMATE
ly estimate wg estimate wcurate becauuilding of int
akdown of the
other, while egure below:
otal Buildi
20,375 5,025 10,867
.S. Means Cos
. When competween the tw
but the refereproblem bec
Universit
ring | Septem
MATE
ugh to producon Annex is a ostworks refek back-up ond.
e R.S. Means
E
was also prodwas able to beuse this refereerest.
e R.S. Means
evaluating th
ing Cost
5,000.00 5,000.00 7,586.00
stworks resoumparing thesewo estimates nce only pro
cause the Ann
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
ce an accurat university la
erence, the pn a steel frame
Costworks 20
duced using te produced uence include
Costworks 20
he difference
Cost/SF
$ 582.1$ 143.5$ 310.5
urce was signe two values, was that the
oduces an estnex is a two s
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 13
te estimate uaboratory addproject was me; which was
011 square fo
the R.S. Meanusing this typeed numerous
011 assembly
s between th
F
4 59 50
nificantly low a couple of k Costworks btimated buildstory lab spac
on Annex t Mroskey
sing the dition
modeled s the
oot
ns e of
y
he costs.
wer than key building ding cost ce, with
an additionot factorbuilding cfrom the a
The assemcomparinwas morethe increamaking itthe assemproject. Schoices oThese typthere is a when per
After comR.S. Meanat the earinternal in
onal level forr in the extenchosen in Coactual exterio
mbly estimatng this estimae accurate thaase in accurat possible to m
mblies estimaSome major d
of façade systpes of special large amoun
rforming the
mparing the dns resources rly stages of anformation an
r mechanical nsive amount ostworks wasor, but was th
e produced iate with the aan the squareacy of this typmodel the bu
ate resource, differences bems, the lab lized producnt of demolitiassembly est
different meth do not alwaya project whend resources
Architectu
equipment. of work that w faced with b
he most comp
is also signifiactual values e foot estimatpe of estimateuilding more it is still diffi
between the a equipment ats are expenion and MEP timate.
hods and resoys produce anen the scope s may be the
ural Engineer
Furthermorewent into the
brick and a blparable of the
icantly lower of constructiote, but was ste is that there accurately thcult to accuraassembly estand amount osive and are systems for t
ources used n accurate es of work is sti best way to p
Universit
ring | Septem
e, the final ese exterior of tlock brick / se provided s
r than the actuon, it was nottill a considere is a wider rahan the squarately estimattimate and acof special fini not listen in this project, w
to develop estimate. Howill vague. Finproduce an a
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
stimate produthe building.steel frame bselections.
ual cost of coticed that therable amounange of systere foot methote the constructual costs incishes involvethe selectionwhich was no
estimates, it iswever, these tnally, using haccurate estim
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 14
uced in Costw The exterio
back-up. This
onstruction. We assembly esnt off. The reaems to chooseod. Howeveruction cost ofclude the limd with the pr
n of assemblieot estimated i
s concluded tools may be
historical datamate for a pr
on Annex t Mroskey
works did or of the s is far
When stimate
ason for e from, r, using f a
mited roject. es. Also, in detail
that the e effective a and oject.
EXISTI
The projeUniversityaerial pho
The new aaccessiblfor mater
NG COND
ect is located y of Pittsburgotograph bel
addition is plle from both tial storage an
Figure
DITIONS
in Oakland, gh’s main camlow. The Che
laced on top the Chevron nd locating a
e 9 Bird’s Eye Vi
Architectu
Pennsylvaniampus is locateevron Annex
the western Tower and th
an on-site offi
iew of the Chevr
ural Engineer
a; which is laed. The site is outlined in
section of buhe Ashe Audice. The over
ron Annex and a
Universit
ring | Septem
arge neighbo and surroundn RED.
uilding aboveitorium. Therall site layou
adjacent structur
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
orhood in Pittding building
e the Ashe Aue compacted ut plan is incl
res prior to cons
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 15
sburgh whergs are shown
uditorium andsite made it dluded in App
struction
on Annex t Mroskey
re the n in the
d will be difficult
pendix C.
LOCAL
The Chevon a site lParkman
Due to theneed werand was lsmall traiContractoof the pro
Limited p
The follow
RED: Pro
BLUE: Fie
GREEN:
L CONDIT
vron Annex islocated in the Avenue and
e fact that there hard to comlocated approlers and one
or and the Ligoject.
parking was a
wing figure d
oject Site
eld Offices &
Lay-down/St
IONS
s located at 2e corner of Th University D
e project site me by. A siteoximately a q larger doubghting Contra
available at th
displays the lo
& Limited Park
torage Areas
Architectu
19 Parkman Ahe Universityrive.
was located e office was nquarter mile wle-wide traileactor. The la
his site-office
ocations of th
king
s
Figure 10 Ov
ural Engineer
Avenue in Oay of Pittsburg
in a denselyneeded for thwest of the sier. The two s
arger double-
e.
he site, office
verhead View of
Universit
ring | Septem
akland, Penngh’s main cam
y populated ahe multiple pite. The site smaller traile-wide trailer
e, and lay-dow
f Project Area
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
nsylvania. Thmpus at the in
area, parkingrimes involvoffice compl
ers were occu was for the C
wn areas.
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 16
he building isntersection of
g and other ared with the pex consistedupied by the Construction
on Annex t Mroskey
s located f
reas of project d of two
General Manager
CLIENT
The UnivePittsburghnumber oThe Univeis locatedwestern Phundred located oCathedraacademicand 535 fe
Enrollmeaccounts institutionOver 13,5
Although Departmeextremelyproducts.research heterocyc
In additioManagemDepartmeKlimchoc
T INFORM
ersity of Pittsh is a public
of academic aersity is comp
d in Oakland,Pennsylvaniaacademic, ren it. The mos
al of Learningc buildings ineet tall.
nt at the Univ for roughly fns of higher e500 faculty an
The Universent is the maiy notable pro. The space w interests of thclic chemistr
on to the Univment Department is the mai
ck as two main
MATION
burgh, comminstitution tha
areas rangingprised of five with the othe
a. The Oaklanesearch and ast notable of
g. This buildin the world, a
versity is morfive percent oeducation in tnd staff memb
ity of Pittsburin tenant of thofessor with mwill be fitted he tenant incy, combinato
versity and thment is anothein representan representa
Architectu
monly referreat is highly reg from philose campuses. er campusesnd campus haadministrativall the buildi
ing is one of tat an astonish
re than 35,00of all studentsthe state of Pbers assist an
rgh is the outhe space. Thmultiple awa for the depa
clude the totaorial, medicin
heir Chemistrer party invoative for the Uatives for the
ural Engineer
ed to as Pitt, iecognized insophy to dent The main cam located arouas over one
ve buildings ings is the the tallest
hing 42-storie
0 students, ws enrolled in ennsylvania.nd support th
tright owner he departmenrds and publrtment’s synt
al synthesis onal and comp
ry Departmenolved in the pUniversity andepartment.
Universit
ring | Septem
is the owner on a tistry. mpus und
es
which
he needs of th
of the projecnt is led by Dlications invothetic chemis
of natural prodputational che
nt, The Univeproject. The Fnd is led by C
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
of the projec
he University
ct, the UniverDr. Peter Wipolved with thestry researchducts, organemistry.
ersity of PittsbFacilities Man
Chris Nieman
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 17
ct. The Unive
y.
rsity’s Chemipf, who is an e chemistry o
h program. Tometallic and
burgh’s Facilnagement
nn along with
on Annex t Mroskey
ersity of
istry
of natural The d
lities
David
Fig
PROJEC
The UniveChevron competitiprimes anUniversityheld a cobelow.
General Burchick
CM Mascaro Co
Roofing String
Glazing Southwest
G
gure 11 Project
CT DELIV
ersity of PittsAnnex projeively bid andnd their subcy chose to hirst plus a fee c
ContractorConstruction
Agentonstruction, Co.
Contractorgert, Inc.
Contractort Aluminum &
Glass
Other S
Delivery Metho
VERY SYST
burgh used act. The Unive
d was each awcontractors wre a CM Agecontract with
Subs
d
Architectu
TEM
a Design-Bidersity broke
warded as a lwere also lump
nt. Mascaro h the owner. T
OwUniversi
ural Engineer
-Build with C the project inlump sum conp sum contra ConstructionThe organiza
wnerity of Pitt
C
Lu
Universit
ring | Septem
CM Agency pnto eight bidntract. Contracts. Due to tn was the CMational chart f
Cont
ost Plus Fe
ump Sum
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
project delived packages. Eracts held bethe project’s
M Agent that Pfor the Chevr
PlumbContraSSM Indu
Fire SuppContra
Alliance Fire
HVAC ConSSM Indu
ElectrContra
Lighthouse
ArchiWilson Ar
tract Type
ee
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 18
ery method foEach packag
etween each o complexity, Pitt hired andron Annex is
bing actorustries
pression actor Protection
ntractorustries
rical actore Electric
itectrchitects
es
on Annex t Mroskey
or the ge was of the the
d they shown
STAFFI
Burchick job was c
Typicallydoes this project. Fproject mKonesky,Burchick’informatio
On-site, Kalso in chvarious trkeep in tobe complAnnex.
ING PLAN
organized thcomplex, Burc
y, for most of B by staying inFor the Chev
manager. Dav kept him up’s chief estimon that perta
Keith Koneskyharge of four fradesmen thaouch with Davleted. The di
N
heir staff for thchick assigne
Burchick’s prn constant covron Annex, Bve spent mosdated on the
mator, Joe Scained to the b
y is in chargeforemen that
at Burchick emve and Keith iagram below
Architectu
his project sied more fore
rojects, Joe Bntact with the
Burchick assist of his time i daily tasks tramuzzo, for idding of the
e of coordinat help him kemploys. Both to keep trac
w outlines the
ural Engineer
imilar to moseman than usu
Burchick overe project mangned Dave Min the office; hat were bei any question
e project.
ating all of theep track of th
h, Burchick’s k of any accoe staffing plan
Universit
ring | Septem
t of their otheual to this pro
rlooks the ennager that is
Meuschke to t while the oning performens regarding
e contractorshe daily activ accountant aounting or adn that Burchi
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
er projects. Hoject.
ntire process assigned to ttake on the r-site superin
ed. Dave alsog change orde
s involved in vities that areand administrdministrative ck optimized
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 19
However, sin
of the projecthe respectivesponsibilitietendent, Keit
o referred to er costs and a
the project. e performed brative assista duties that n
d for the Chev
on Annex t Mroskey
nce this
ct. He ve es of th any
He is by the
ant also need to vron
ForeJohn W
AHea
Figure 12
emanWalker
ccountingather Sabala
Bu
Burchick Staffin
ForemBill Mro
urchic
g Plan
Architectu
PresidJoe Bur
Project MDave Meu
SuperinteKeith Kon
manoskey
ck Sta
ural Engineer
dentrchick
Manageruschke
endentnesky
ForemRay Bow
affing
Universit
ring | Septem
manwser
Ad
A
g Plan
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
ChJo
ForemaBob Mros
dministrativAssistant
Amanda Myer
n
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 20
hief Estimatoe Scaramuzz
anskey
ve
rs
on Annex t Mroskey
torzo
APPEN
See figure
DIX A – P
e below
ROJECT S
Architectu
SCHEDULE
ural Engineer
E SUMMAR
Universit
ring | Septem
RY
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 21
on Annex t Mroskey
ID Task Mode
Task Name Duration Start
1 PRECONSTRUCTION 193 days Wed 8/5/092 Project Bidding Period 20 days Wed 8/5/093 Project Award 0 days Mon 9/28/094 Notice to Proceed 0 days Fri 11/20/095 Submittals & Shop Dwgs 102 days Thu 12/10/096 CONSTRUCTION 486 days Fri 11/20/097 Mobilization 13 days Fri 11/20/098 Auditorium Demo 121 days Wed 12/2/099 Site Utilities 34 days Sat 5/15/1010 Prelim Sitework/Bulk Excavation 82 days Thu 12/3/09
11 Soil Nailing & Temporary Shoring 22 days Wed 3/10/10
12 Mat Slabs/Pile Caps/Micropiles 85 days Wed 2/17/10
13 Foundation Walls 48 days Tue 5/11/1014 Steel Erection 39 days Thu 5/27/1015 Steel Erection Complete 0 days Tue 7/20/1016 Deck & Detailing 48 days Tue 6/22/1017 Fireproofing 45 days Thu 7/22/1018 Building Enclosure/Shell 237 days Thu 10/21/1019 Auditorium/Lobby Complete 0 days Thu 12/30/1020 MEP Rough In 158 days Wed 9/22/1021 MEP Finish 89 days Fri 4/29/1122 Roofing ‐ Coping & Flashing 22 days Thu 8/25/1123 Interiors 159 days Mon 2/7/1124 Punchlist 8 days Wed 8/31/1125 Final Sitework & Cleanup 45 days Fri 7/29/1126 Demobilization 10 days Mon 9/19/1127 TURNOVER/COMMISSIONING 57 days Wed 7/27/1128 Commissioning & TAB 29 days Wed 7/27/1129 Final L&I Inspection 21 days Fri 9/2/1130 Building Air Flush Out 2 days Fri 9/16/1131 Final Completion 0 days Mon 9/19/1132 University Move In 5 days Mon 9/19/1133 Construction Work Complete 0 days Fri 10/14/11
PRECONSTRUCTION
Project Bidding Period
Project Award
Notice to Proceed
Submittals & Shop Dwgs
CONSTRUCTION
Mobilization
Auditorium Demo
Site Utilities
Prelim Sitework/Bulk Excavation
Soil Nailing & Temporary Shoring
Mat Slabs/Pile Caps/Micropiles
Foundation Walls
Steel Erection
Steel Erection Complete
Deck & Detailing
Fireproofing
Building Enclosure/Shell
Auditorium/Lobby Complete
MEP Rough In
MEP Finish
Roofing ‐ Coping & Flashing
Interiors
Punchlist
Final Sitework & Cleanup
Demobilization
TURNOVER/COMMISSIONING
Commissioning & TAB
Final L&I Inspection
Building Air Flush Out
Final Completion
University Move In
Construction Work Complete
7/5 9/20 12/6 2/21 5/9 7/25 10/10 12/26 3/13 5/29 8/14 10/30 1/15October 11 March 21 September 1 February 11 July 21 January 1
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration‐only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start‐only
Finish‐only
Deadline
Progress
University of Pittsburgh Chevron AnnexPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Robert Mroskey
Project: Chevron Schedule SummDate: Tue 9/20/11
APPEN
Estimate N
Building Ty
Location:
Story CounStory HeigFloor Area
Labor TypeBasement Data ReleaCost Per SqFoot: Building Co** Only 1 F
A SubstrucA1010
A1030 A2010
A2020
B Shell B1010
DIX B.1 –
SqName: Ch
21ype: Co
CoNa
nt: 1 ht (L.F.): 16(S.F.): 35
e: UnIncluded: Noase: Yequare $1
ost: $5Floor
cture StStcaspKSSlaSlaBaExonBaFoPLFoPL
FloFloanPS
SQUARE F
quare Foot Coshevron Annex 19 Parkman Avollege, Laboratoncrete Brick Bational Averag
6 5000
nion o ear 2011 Quart143.58
5,025,500
tandard Foundrip footing, coapacity 3 KSF, 1pread footings,SF, 4' ‐ 6" squaab on Grade ab on grade, 4asement Excavxcavate and filln site storage asement Wallsoundation wallLF, 8" thick oundation wallLF, 12" thick
oor Constructioor, concrete, nd column, 35'SF total load
Architectu
FOOT EST
st Estimate Re
ve , Pittsburgh tory with FaceBack‐up / Steege
ter 3
dationsncrete, reinfor12" deep x 24" 3000 PSI concre x 12" deep
" thick, non indvation, 30,000 SF, 4'
s , CIP, 4' wall he
, CIP, 4' wall he
ion slab form, opex35' bay, 41" d
ural Engineer
TIMATE S
port
, PA , 15260e Brick with el Frame
rced, load 5.1 Kwide crete, load 50K
dustrial, reinfo
deep, sand, gr
eight, direct ch
eight, direct ch
en web bar joisdeep, 125 PSF s
Universit
ring | Septem
UMMARY
Costs are derived fro
Scope differences an
KLF, soil bearin
K, soil bearing c
orced
ravel, or comm
hute, .099 CY/L
hute, .148 CY/L
st @ 2' OC, on superimposed
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
Y
om a building model wit
nd market conditions ca
% of Total
CoS.
8.00% $$2
ng
capacity 3
$4
$0
mon earth,
$3LF, 4.8
LF, 7.2
17.90% $2$3
W beam d load, 173
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 22
th basic components.
an cause costs to vary sig
ost Per .F.
C
11.20 $2.26 $
4.96 $
0.17 $
3.81 $
25.20 $3.93 $
on Annex t Mroskey
gnificantly.
Cost
$392,000$79,000
$173,500
$6,000
$133,500
$882,000$137,500
B1020
B2010
B2020
B2030
B3010
B3020
C InteriorsC1010
C1020
C1030 C3010
FloanPSFicoRoFlo25ExBr8"ExAlnoGlExDohaDo0"RoRofeInRoFlaGrRoSkglaRogaSmop
s PaCofinCofinInDo3'FitLoW
oor, concrete, nd column, 35'SF total load, foreproofing, gypolumn, 3 hour roof Constructiooor, steel joist5'x30' bay, 25" xterior Walls rick wall, comp" thick, perlite xterior Windowuminum flush o intermediatelazing panel, pxterior Doors oor, aluminumardware, 6'‐0" oor, aluminum" x 10'‐0" openoof Coverings oofing, asphaltlt, mopped sulation, rigid,oof edges, alumashing, aluminravel stop, alumoof Openings kylight, plastic azing oof hatch, withalvanized steel,moke hatch, unperator
artitions oncrere block (nish oncrere block (nish terior Doors oor, single leaf‐0" x 7'‐0" x 1‐ttings ockers, steel, siWall Finishes
Architectu
slab form, opex35' bay, 41" dor columns addpsum board, firating, 14 PLFon s, beams, 1.5" deep, 40 PSF s
posite double wcore fill ws tube frame, fo
e horizontals late glass, 1/4"
m & glass, with x 10'‐0" openi
m & glass, with ing
t flood coat, gr
roof deck, comminum, duranonum, no backinminum, extrud
domes, insulat
h curb, 1" fiber, 165 lbs nlabeled, galva
(CMU) partitio
(CMU) partitio
f, kd steel fram3/4"
ingle tier, 5' to
ural Engineer
en web bar joisdeep, 125 PSF sd re rated, 2 lay
22 ga metal dsuperimposed
wythe, standar
or 1/4"glass,1‐
" thick, clear
transom, narrong transom, non‐
avel, base shee
mposite with 2odic, .050" thicng sides, .019"ded, 4", mill fin
ted curbs, 30 S
rglass insulatio
anized, 2'‐6" x 3
n, light weight
n, light weight
me, kalamein fir
6' high, per op
Universit
ring | Septem
st @ 2' OC, on superimposed
ers, 1" thick, 8
eck, on column load, 60 PSF t
rd face/CMU b
3/4"x4", 5'x6'
ow stile, doubl
‐standard, hard
et, 3 plies 15#
2" EPS, 1" perlick, 6" face
nish, .050" thic
SF to 65 SF, sin
n, 2'‐6" x 3'‐0"
3', not incl han
t, hollow, 6" th
t, hollow, 8" th
re, commercia
pening, minim
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
W beam d load, 173
8" steel
$7ns, otal load
$4ack‐up,
$opening,
$2
le door,
dware, 3'‐
$4asphalt
te
k $0
gle
",
nd winch
20.20% $2$9
hick, no
hick, no
$l quality,
$0um
$5
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 23
7.09 $
4.71 $
1.99 $
2.09 $
4.99 $
0.41 $
28.44 $9.31 $
1.39 $
0.04 $
5.54 $
on Annex t Mroskey
$248,000
$165,000
$69,500
$73,000
$174,500
$14,500
$995,500$326,000
$48,500
$1,500
$194,000
C3020 C3030
D ServicesD2010
D2020
D2040 D3050
D4010 D4020
D5010
D5020
2 PaWFloCaCoViCeAc&
PlWUrLaLax 2SeShWDoGa57RaRoRoTeRoSFSpWStWfloElSe3 Fe10Sw12LigReSF
coats paint onainting, mason
Wall coatings, epoor Finishes arpet tile, nyloomposition floonyl, compositieiling Finishes coustic ceilingschannel grid, s
umbing FixturWater closet, vitrinal, vitreous avatory w/trimab sink w/trim,24" OD ervice sink w/trhower, stall, fibWater cooler, elomestic Wateras fired water 76 GPH ain Water Draioof drain, CI, sooof drain, CI, soerminal & Packooftop, multizoF, 95.83 ton prinklers Wet pipe sprinktandpipes Wet standpipe roor ectrical Servicervice installatiphase, 4 wire, eeder installati000 A witchgear insta200 A ghting and Braeceptacles incl F, with transfor
Architectu
masonry withry or concretepoxy coatings,
n, fusion bondoring, epoxy, mon tile, maxim
s, 3/4"mineral suspended sup
res treous china, bchina, wall hun, wall hung, PE polyethylene,
rim, vitreous cberglass 1 piecectric, wall hur Distributionheater, comm
inageoil,single hub, oil,single hub, kage Unitsone, air condit
ler systems, st
risers, class III,
e/Distributionion, includes b120/208 V, 10on 600 V, inclu
allation, incl sw
anch Wiringplate, box, cormer
ural Engineer
block filler, latex, brushwmaximum
ed, 18" x 18" ominimumum
fiber, 12" x 12pport
bowl only with ngE on CI, 18" x 1, single bowl, d
hina, wall hunge, three walls, ng, wheelchair
ercial, 100< F r
6" diam, 10' hi6" diam, for ea
ioner, schools
eel, light hazar
steel, black, sc
nreakers, meter000 A uding RGS cond
witchboard, pan
nduit, wire, 8 p
Universit
ring | Septem
work, primer &
or 24" x 24", 35
2" tile, conceale
flush valve, wa
15"double drainbo
g 22" x 20"36" squarer type, 7.5 GPH
rise, 600 MBH
ighach additional
and colleges, 2
rd, 1 floor, 50,0
ch 40, 6" diam
ring, 20' condu
duit and XHHW
nels & circuit b
per 1000 SF, .9
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
2 coats
$5
5 oz $6
ed 2" bar
52.90% $7$3
all hung
oard, 54"
H $3
input,
$0
foot add
$25,000
$2000 SF
$0pipe, 1
$2uit & wire,
W wire,
breaker,
$9 W per
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 24
5.59 $
6.57 $
74.43 $31.89 $
3.21 $
0.64 $
19.00 $
2.80 $
0.27 $
2.54 $
10.47 $
on Annex t Mroskey
$195,500
$230,000
$2,605,000$1,116,000
$112,500
$22,500
$665,000
$98,000
$9,500
$89,000
$366,500
D5030
D5090
E EquipmeE1020
E1090 F Special CG Building
SubTotal ContractorArchitectuUser Fees Total Build
WMCeFlFCCoCodeFicoInOtGegaUnkV
ent & FurnishinInArdiArfibAropArdrArinOt
Construction Sitework
r Fees (Generaural Fees
ding Cost
Wall switches, 2Miscellaneous pentral air conduorescent fixtuC, 10 fixtures @ommunicationommunication etectors, includre alarm commonduit ternet wiring, ther Electrical enerator sets, as/gasoline openinterruptible VA/12.75 kW ngsstitutional Equrchitectural eqstilled water, drchitectural eqberglass, radio rchitectural eqpen rchitectural eqrawer units rchitectural eqcluding HVAC, ther Equipmen
al Conditions,O
Architectu
.0 per 1000 SFpower, 1 wattitioning powerures recess mo@32watt per 10ns and Securityand alarm sysdes outlets, bomand center, a
8 data/voice oSystemsw/battery, chaerated, 3 phaspower supply
uipmentuipment, labodeluxe uipment, laboisotope uipment, labo
uipment, labo
uipment, labodeluxe includint
Overhead,Prof
ural Engineer
F
r, 3 wattsounted in ceilin000 SF ytems, fire deteoxes, conduit addressable wit
outlets per 100
arger, muffler ae, 4 wire, 277/with standard
ratory equipm
ratory equipm
ratory equipm
ratory equipm
ratory equipming fixtures
it)
Universit
ring | Septem
ng, 1.6 watt pe
ection, addressnd wire th voice, excl. w
00 S.F.
and transfer sw/480 V, 11.5 kW battery pack,
ment glassware
ment glove box,
ment, cabinets,
ment, cabinets,
ment fume hood
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
er SF, 40
$3sable, 50
wire &
$0
witch, W
15
1.10% $$
washer,
,
wall,
base,
ds, not
$00.00% $00.00% $0
100% $2.00% $20.00% $00.00% $0
$
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 25
3.36 $
0.24 $
1.50 $1.50 $
0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $
140.77 $2.81 $0.00 $0.00 $143.58 $
on Annex t Mroskey
$117,500
$8,500
$52,500$52,500
$0$0$0
$4,927,000$98,500$0$0$5,025,500
APPEN
See Table
DIX B.2 –
e Below
ASSEMBL
Architectu
LY ESTIMA
ural Engineer
ATE SUMM
Universit
ring | Septem
MARY
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 26
on Annex t Mroskey
219 Parkman Ave
Pittsburgh, Assembly Summary Report
Robert Mroskey
Penn State22-Sep-11Chevron Assembly
Prepared By:
Date:
PA, 15620
Year 2011 Quarter 3
TotalDivision Description
SubstructureA $116,713.98
ShellB $3,265,100.00
InteriorsC $1,388,040.27
ServicesD $4,455,621.20
Equipment & FurnishingsE $823,970.00
Building SiteworkG $194,296.35
Grand Total
Subtotal
$307,312.25
$316,531.62
$0.00
$10,867,585.68
Subtotal $10,243,741.80
Subtotal $10,551,054.05
General Contractor's Markup on Subs 3.00%
General Conditions 3.00%
General Contractor's Overhead and Profit 3.00%
$10,243,741.80
1
219 Parkman Ave
Pittsburgh,
Assembly Detail Report
22-Sep-11
Robert Mroskey
Penn State
Prepared By:PA, 15620
Date:Chevron Assembly
Year 2011 Quarter 3
Assembly
Number
Quantity Unit Ext. Total Incl.
O&P
Description Total Incl.
O&P
A Substructure
A10102108250 4.00 Ea. $40,008.32 Spread footings, 3000 PSI concrete, load
800K, soil bearing capacity 3 KSF, 18' - 0"
square x 39" deep
$10,002.08
A10102506250 17.00 Ea. $63,307.66 Pile caps, 10 piles, 11' - 6" x 7' - 9" x 49",
120 ton capacity, 31"column size, 2345 K
column
$3,723.98
A20201202600 50.00 L.F. $13,398.00 Concrete wall, CIP foundation wall, 12"
thick, 3500 PSI concrete, 10' high
$267.96
A $116,713.98Substructure Subtotal
B Shell
B10102081500 10,000.00 V.L.F. $291,600.00 Steel column, TS7x5, 25 K, 20' unsupported
length, 14.53 PLF
$29.16
B10102412700 35,000.00 S.F. $369,250.00 W beam and girder, 20'x20' bay, 40 PSF
superimposed load, 14" deep, fireproofing
.839 SF/SF, 90 PSF total load
$10.55
B10102431950 35,000.00 S.F. $1,132,600.00 Floor - ceiling, structural steel, galvanized
composite deck, 3" deep, 20 gauge
$32.36
B10102540720 35,000.00 S.F. $738,850.00 Floor, composite metal deck, 5" slab, 20'x20'
bay, 21" total depth, 75 PSF superimposed
load, 126 PSF total load
$21.11
B10107100450 2,000.00 L.F. $82,960.00 Fireproofing, concrete, 3000 PSI, 1.5" thick,
12" x 4" steel beam, 2 hour rating, 93 PLF
$41.48
B20101282100 5,000.00 S.F. $174,050.00 Stone wall, ashlar veneer, 4" thick, 8' high,
metal studs@16" back-up, low priced stone
$34.81
B20101465300 11,000.00 S.F. $85,580.00 Metal siding panel, textured aluminum, 4' x
10' x 5/16", plywood backing, single face
$7.78
B20202201400 12,000.00 S.F. $374,160.00 Glazing panel, insulating, 1" thick units, 2
lites, 1/4" float glass, clear
$31.18
B30101603800 15,000.00 S.F. $16,050.00 Insulation, roof deck, polystyrene extruded,
2" thick
$1.07
B $3,265,100.00Shell Subtotal
C Interiors
C10101361200 75,000.00 S.F. $594,750.00 Partitions, gypsum board, 5/8" thick,
standard
$7.93
C10101382500 15,500.00 S.F. $150,815.00 Partitions, load bearing metal stud, 16 ga,
16" OC, 6" wide
$9.73
C10201141000 170.00 Ea. $183,492.90 Metal door/metal frame, flush-hollow core,
20 ga full panel, 3'-0" x 7'-0", KD drywall
frame frame, 4-7/8"
$1,079.37
C10201142360 10.00 Ea. $25,024.60 Metal door/metal frame, flush-hollow core,
louver design, 6'-0" x 7'-0", KD drywall
frame, 4-7/8"
$2,502.46
C10203100100 500.00 Ea. $3,460.00 Hinges, full mortise, low frequency, steel
base, 4-1/2" x 4-1/2", USP
$6.92
C10203100400 40.00 Ea. $6,334.80 Locksets, heavy duty cylindrical, keyed,
single cylinder function
$158.37
C10203100560 80.00 Ea. $23,456.80 Closers, rack & pinion, adjustable
backcheck, 3 way mount, all sizes, regular
arm
$293.21
C10203100740 30.00 Ea. $1,786.20 Push, push plate, aluminum $59.54
C20101301700 7.00 Flight $99,436.40 Stairs, steel, cement fill pan tread, 24 risers $14,205.20
1
Assembly
Number
Quantity Unit Ext. Total Incl.
O&P
Description Total Incl.
O&P
C20101301800 7.00 Flight $8,928.57 Stairs, steel, cement fill pan tread, add for
intermediate landing
$1,275.51
C30102300080 60,000.00 S.F. $70,200.00 Painting, interior on plaster and drywall,
brushwork, primer & 2 coats
$1.17
C30102300260 35,000.00 S.F. $44,450.00 Painting, cabinets and casework, enamel,
primer & 1 coat
$1.27
C30204101100 3,500.00 S.F. $64,785.00 Terrazzo, minimum $18.51
C30302101000 20,000.00 S.F. $84,000.00 Suspended ceiling, 2' x 4' grid, fiberglass
board, film faced, 5/8" thick
$4.20
C30302201400 6,000.00 S.F. $27,120.00 Ceilings, suspended gypsum board, 4' x 8' x
5/8", gypsum drywall, 2 coats paint
$4.52
C $1,388,040.27Interiors Subtotal
D Services
D20101102080 12.00 Ea. $31,043.04 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with
flush valve, wall hung
$2,586.92
D20102102000 2.00 Ea. $2,878.54 Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung $1,439.27
D20103101600 15.00 Ea. $19,390.95 Lavatory w/trim, vanity top, PE on CI, 19" x
16" oval
$1,292.73
D20104301960 16.00 Ea. $18,243.20 Lab sink w/trim, polypropylene, cup sink,
oval, 10" x 4-1/2" od
$1,140.20
D20908100920 12,000.00 L.F. $662,400.00 Pipe cast iron, soil, B & S, service weight, 6"
diameter
$55.20
D30105301920 35,000.00 S.F. $307,300.00 Commercial building heating systems,
terminal unit heaters, forced hot water,
10,000 SF bldg,100,000 CF, total, 2 floors
$8.78
D30201242600 35,000.00 S.F. $215,250.00 Gas fired, heating and cooling, area to 3000
SF
$6.15
D30401061010 2.00 Ea. $186,517.00 AHU, field fabricated, built up, cool/heat
coils, filters, constant volume, 40,000 CFM
$93,258.50
D30401101020 1.00 Ea. $32,160.38 AHU, central station, cool/heat coils,
constant volume, filters, 5,000 CFM
$32,160.38
D30501501760 35,000.00 S.F. $393,050.00 Rooftop, single zone, air conditioner, banks
or libraries, 10,000 SF, 41.67 ton
$11.23
D30903101050 12.00 Ea. $641,328.96 Fume hood exhaust system, 10 FT long,
8000 CFM
$53,444.08
D40104202500 35,000.00 S.F. $206,150.00 Fire sprinkler system wet, ordinary hazard,
one floor, area to 8000 SF/floor
$5.89
D40203100560 4.00 Floor $31,046.32 Wet standpipe risers, class I, steel, black, sch
40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor
$7,761.58
D50101200280 50.00 Ea. $191,170.00 Service installation, includes breakers,
metering, 20' conduit & wire, 3 phase, 4
wire, 120/208 V, 200 A
$3,823.40
D50101200520 1.25 Ea. $48,365.31 Service installation, includes breakers,
metering, 20' conduit & wire, 3 phase, 4
wire, 120/208 V, 1600 A
$38,692.25
D50102400360 1.00 Ea. $46,513.00 Switchgear installation, incl switchboard,
panels & circuit breaker, 1600 A
$46,513.00
D50201150280 35,000.00 S.F. $295,400.00 Receptacle systems, underfloor duct, 7' on
center, low density
$8.44
D50202481300 50.00 Ea. $22,681.00 Lighting, fluorescent, surface mounted, 2' x
4', acryl prismatic diffuser
$453.62
D50202481400 75.00 Ea. $29,461.50 Lighting, fluorescent, strip fixture, 8' long,
two 8' lamps
$392.82
D50303100320 35,000.00 S.F. $411,250.00 Telephone systems, underfloor duct, 7' on
center, high density
$11.75
D50309100280 2.00 Ea. $263,702.00 Communication and alarm systems, includes
outlets, boxes, conduit and wire, sound
systems, 100 outlets
$131,851.00
D50902101400 1,500.00 kW $400,320.00 Generator sets, w/battery, charger, muffler
and transfer switch, diesel engine with fuel
tank, 1000 kW
$266.88
D $4,455,621.20Services Subtotal
E Equipment & Furnishings
2
Assembly
Number
Quantity Unit Ext. Total Incl.
O&P
Description Total Incl.
O&P
E10207300110 1,000.00 L.F. $223,330.00 Architectural equipment, laboratory
equipment, cabinets, wall, open
$223.33
E10207300120 1,000.00 L.F. $600,640.00 Architectural equipment, laboratory
equipment, cabinets, base, drawer units
$600.64
E $823,970.00Equipment & Furnishings Subtotal
G Building Sitework
G20103052000 140.00 L.F. $1,318.80 Concrete curb, 6" wide, 18" high,
cast-in-place
$9.42
G20103053000 100.00 L.F. $2,329.00 Granite curb, 4-1/2" wide, 12" high precast $23.29
G20301201600 5,000.00 L.F. $124,500.00 Concrete sidewalk, 4" thick, 4" gravel base,
4' wide
$24.90
G20301506100 500.00 S.F. $20,125.00 Plaza, granite pavers, 3-1/2" x 3-1/2" x
3-1/2" thick, slab-on-grade, mortar bedding
$40.25
G20504201000 1,500.00 S.Y. $18,015.00 Lawn establishment, with loam, lime,
fertilizer, seed, hay mulch
$12.01
G30603201010 1.00 Ea. $28,008.55 Storage tank, fuel, underground, double wall
steel, 500 gallon
$28,008.55
G $194,296.35Building Sitework Subtotal
3
APPEN
See figure
DIX C – O
e below
OVERALL S
Architectu
SITE LAYO
ural Engineer
OUT PLAN
Universit
ring | Septem
N
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 27
on Annex t Mroskey
APPEN
The figureChevron the steel l
Sequ
Se
Seq
DIX D – ST
es below porAnnex. The laydown area
uence #4 Erect S
quence #6 Erec
quence #8 Erect
TEEL PHA
rtray sequenccrane was pla was also on
Steel CL 14.5-8.9
ct Steel CL 6.1-0
t Steel CL 14.5-8
Architectu
ASE SEQUE
ces 4-15 for tlaced at the sn University D
9 Floor 2
.0 Floor 2
.9 Floor 4
ural Engineer
ENCING
the steel erecsouthwest corDrive.
Universit
ring | Septem
ction involvedrner of the bu
Sequenc
Sequenc
Sequen
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
d with the veuilding on Un
ce #5 Erect Steel
ce #7 Erect Steel
nce #9 Erect Stee
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 28
ertical additioniversity Driv
l CL 8.9-6.1 Floo
l CL 14.5-8.9 Flo
el CL 8.9-5.9 Flo
on Annex t Mroskey
on of the ve and
or 2
oor 3
oor 3
Seq
Sequ
Seque
quence #10 Ere
uence #12 Erec
ence #14 Erect S
ect Steel CL 8.9-5
ct Steel CL 5.9-0.
Steel CL 8.9-5.9
Architectu
5.9 Floor 4
.0 Floor 4
Floor Roof
ural Engineer
Universit
ring | Septem
Sequence
Sequence #
Sequence #
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
e #11 Erect Steel
#13 Erect Steel C
#15 Erect Steel C
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 29
l CL 5.9-0.0 Floo
CL 14.5-8.9 Floo
CL 5.9-0.0 Floor
on Annex t Mroskey
or 3
or Roof
r Roof
APPEN
The figure(shown insequenceterra cottwhich piespace profrom the bkey roles
The terra clockwisesouth elevthe steps moving aprocess flcotta faça
DIX E – TE
es below porn red) for the e plan of the ta system was
eces of equipovided at thebottom up an
s in dictating
cotta first stae manner. Wvation’s back of the system
along to the celowing smoo
ade. The figu
ERRA COT
rtray the pha Chevron Anterra cotta is s installed us
pment were toe time of instand the cornerthe starting p
arted on the eWhile the east
kup framing wm, resulting inenter; the we
othly. Finallyures below po
Architectu
TTA FACA
sing that wasnex. It is imp a simplified ving both swino be used waallation. One r tiles of the spoints of the i
east side of th elevation wawas able to bn a better oveest elevation , the terra coortray the seq
ural Engineer
ADE PHAS
s involved wiportant to notversion of theng scaffolds aas a decision major issue
system needeinstallation p
he building aas being insta
be installed. erall efficienwas being fr
otta finished oquencing of e
East Elevation
Universit
ring | Septem
E SEQUEN
ith installing tte that these e actual phasand JLG boom made on-site to note is thaed to be insta
procedure inv
and was phasalled and the This allowed
ncy of the worramed and inon the north eeach face of t
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
NCING
the terra cott figures that psing used on m lifts. The de to best utiliat the tiles nealled simultanvolved with th
sed around the southeast cod the crews torkers. As the
nsulated, keepelevation, comthe building
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 30
ta façade sysportray the p site. In addideterminationize the equipm
eeded to be inneously, whiche system.
he building inorner was seo specialize ine south elevatping the instampleting the shown by the
on Annex t Mroskey
tem phasing ition, the n of ment and nstalled ch were
n a t, the n one of tion was allation
e terra e arrows.
Architectu
S
W
ural Engineer
South Elevation
West Elevation
Universit
ring | Septem
n
n
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 31
on Annex t Mroskey
Architectu
N
ural Engineer
North Elevation
Universit
ring | Septem
n
ty of Pittsbur
mber 23, 201
rgh – ChevroRobert
1 | 32
on Annex t Mroskey