The 63rd ECCE General Meeting was
held on 4th – 5th March 2016 in Madrid,
in Spain, hosted by the Colegio de Inge-
nieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
(CICCP). The 63rd ECCE General
Meeting was organized as part of the
celebration of an International Civil
Engineering Congress which hosted the
Portuguese and Spanish Speaking Civil
Engineering Professional Associations
(CICPC) Congress concurrent with its
annual General Assembly. Particularly,
the 7th Council of Civil Engineering
Professional Associations from Spanish
and Portuguese Speaking Countries
was held on 29th February – 1st March.
On 29th February the CICPC Meeting
was held. On the same day the Hom-
age Ceremony rendered by the Colegio
de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, the World Council of Civil Engineers and the Instituto de
Ingeniería de España for the legacy of Professor José Medem Sanjuan and the presentation of WCCE's
José Medem Sanjuan Civil Engineering Excellence Award were held at the premises of the Instituto de
Ingeniería de España. On 2nd – 3rd March the International Congress of Civil Engineering “Paths to bring
the world together” was held. ECCE President was member of the Honour Committee of the Congress.
As a postscript to the First International Conference of Civil Engineering, the Declaration of Madrid was
signed, with the aim of showing the commitment of the profession to sustainable development and global
concern about climate change. Therefore, the profession offers its technological capabilities and expertise
to mitigate its effects. The Madrid Declaration has been signed by the following institutions and their re-
spective representatives:
Juan A. Santamera Sanchez, president of the Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos (Spain);
Vicent Esteban Chapapría, president of the Association of Civil Engineering, Chan-
nels and Ports (Spain);
Alfonso Alberto González Fernández, president of WCCE - World Council of Civil
Engineers;
Włodzimierz Szymczak, President of ECCE - European Council of Civil Engineers;
José Tadeu da Silva, president of UPADI - Pan American Union of Engineers;
José Manuel Pereira Vieira, president of FEANI - European Federation of National
63rd ECCE General Meeting
4th – 5st March 2016, Madrid, Spain
I N S I D E T H I S
I S S U E :
Madrid Decla-
ration
2
Be an ECCE
Member
(EUCivEng) -
ECCE Individ-
ual Member-
ship
6
4th HLF Meet-
ing
8
TTIP negotia-
tions: A draft
framework for
the civil engi-
neering com-
munity
11
Consultation
on the Fitness
Check for the
Construction
13
Consultation
on proposal to
introduce a
Services Pass-
port and ad-
dress regula-
tory barriers in
the construc-
tion and busi-
ness services
15
News from
ECCE and
other Organi-
zations
16
News from
ECCE Mem-
bers
20
European Council of Civil
Engineers M A Y 2 0 1 6 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
N E W S
F R O M :
Cyprus
Czech Re-public
Estonia
Georgia
Hungary
Group photo of the 63rd ECCE General Meeting participants
63rd ECCE General Meeting
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vJvhSJQlCxKfHCmyxyi3KUZ5RESFMnxApTuj2dCNTqI/edit?pref=2&pli=1
P A G E 2 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Engineering Associations;
Carlos Matias Ramos, bastonário ODE Portugal and president of the ICPC-CECPC - Council of Portuguese and Spanish Speaking Civil Engineering Professional Associations.
The 63rd ECCE General Meeting was very
well attended. Among the distinguished
guests were the WFEO Past President
Eng. Marwan Abdelhamid, the ECEC Sec-
retary General Mr. Klaus Thurriedl, the
WCCE President Eng. Alfonso Gonzalez,
and the WCCE Past President Mr. Emilio
Colon.
During the 63rd ECCE General Meeting the
Institution of Civil Engineers (United King-
dom) after a period of one year that had
suspended its activity and participation in
ECCE, was unanimously accepted as EC-
CE Member again starting its membership
from 1st January 2016. ECCE also accept-
ed a new Full Member, Ukraine. The or-
ganization that represents Ukraine in EC-
CE is the Association "Information Technol-
ogies in Construction of Ukraine".
In the course of the 63rd ECCE General Meeting a number of important issues were discussed and critical deci-
sions were taken. It was decided that ECCE will join the Engineering Association of Mediterranean Countries
(EAMC) with the status of observer and the ECCE representative to the EAMC, Mr. Aris Chatzidakis, was appoint-
ed by the ECCE President. The ECCE Standing Committees were terminated and their closing activity reports were
presented by their Chairmen. The New ECCE Strategy was the major topic of this General Meeting and time for
detailed discussion was dedicated to it. The Guidelines for the “ECCE Position Papers and other activities” was
finalized and a number of suggestions for ECCE Position Papers was presented at a conception stage. The New
ECCE Strategy has been welcomed by the ECCE Members and positive thinking and brainstorming was achieved.
The idea of opening of the ECCE Individual Membership with the status of Associate Membership was voted and
finalized too. Finally, the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership was also discussed and a presentation on
the latest evolvements on the TTIP negotiations was delivered by Mr. Govind Nadkarni from the Texas Board of
Professional Engineers.
The video recordings of the 63rd ECCE General Meeting can be watched here.
The European Council of Civil Engineers would like to express its gratitude to the Colegio de Ingenieros de
Caminos, Canales y Puertos for the successful organization of the 63rd ECCE General Assembly and their
exceptional hospitality.
From left to right: Fernando Branco, Wlodzimierz Szymczak,
Vincent Esteban, Massimo Mariani
The undersigned, on the occasion of the celebration in Madrid of the 5th Iberoamerican Congress of Civil Engineer-
ing, the 7th General Assembly of the Council of Civil Engineering Professional Associations of Portuguese and
Spanish speaking countries CICPC-CECPC , the 63rd General Assembly of the European Council of Civil Engi-
neers - ECCE and other events organized by the World Council of Civil Engineers - WCCE proclaim that:
THE CHALLENGES OF OUR SOCIETY
Social and economic development relies upon the sustainable management of the world’s natural re-
sources. The depletion of natural resources and its negative effects on environmental degradation, among others;
desertification, drought, land degradation, water scarcity and biodiversity loss step up the challenges facing human-
kind.
In addition to these, our world faces the challenge of climate change and an unstoppable process of urban-
ization and population growth. Climate change is one of the biggest challenges of our time and its adverse ef-
fects undermine the potential of all countries to achieve sustainable development.
CICCP, CICPC-CECPC, ECCE, WCCE
"Civil Engineers committed to UN’s objectives of sustainable
development and climate action”
Madrid Declaration
https://sites.google.com/a/ciccp.es/63rd-ecce-meeting/video-recordings
P A G E 3 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Such situation requires well targeted and sustained action in time, not subject to political cycles, with the
joint commitment of governments, professionals and society as a whole.
OUR VISION, OUR ROLE
We, civil engineers set our collective role to overcome the challenges faced by our society in order to achieve full
social and human development in harmony with the environment and on such grounds we consider that
Civil Engineers, as members of the global community must base its practice in compliance with the ethical, human and social values of our time.
Civil engineering should commit its expertise and practice to solve social and technical demands linked to the territory.
Consequently civil engineering, as a professional activity, should be able to identify achievable goals con-sistent with the stakeholders’ interests and problems through effective management and efficient use of the
tools and resources available.
The existence of an Engineering-Society Nexus implies the mutual commitment on which engineers take the responsibility to faithfully serve society, whereas society is to provide the means to honour such undertaking.
Civil Engineers share the global concern for sustainable development and climate change. Therefore, we offer our
technological capabilities and expertise to achieve the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (ODS) and his 169
goals as reflected in Agenda 2030 for the sustainable development of the UN General Assembly approved by Sep-
tember 2015. We also align ourselves with the efforts to enforce the agreements of the Conference of the Par-
ties, COP-21 in Paris, December 2015, recognizing the need for a progressive and effective response to the ur-
gent threat of climate change, on the basis of the best available science.
The objectives to be accomplished, in particular the satisfaction of population’s basic needs and the develop-
ment processes conducive to an overall improvement of living conditions, find Civil Engineering an essential
resource to make these objectives come true.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY
The responsibility of Civil Engineers to society is very high. Under society’s mandate to create a sustainable
world and improve overall quality of life, civil engineers concur with American Society of Civil Engineers’ Vision
2025, according to which we serve as competent, collaborative and ethical way experts:
Planners, designers, builders and managers of economic and social engine of society, which is called the built environment;
Custodians of the natural environment and the proper and efficient use of its resources;
Innovators and integrators of ideas and technologies in the public, private and academic sectors;
Risk Managers of any uncertainties caused by natural events, accidents and other threats; and;
Leader in debates and decisions that shape both environmental and infrastructure public policies.
Civil engineers have clearly defined responsibilities in planning, design, construction, operation and
maintenance of physical infrastructure. This infrastructure requires the use of natural resources and include all
types of buildings, power plants and distribution lines, industrial facilities, transportation networks, water resource
services and urban water systems. They are expected to remain in service, sustainable and safe for their in-
tended life cycle, typically from 50 to over 100 years. Such are exposed and are potentially vulnerable to ex-
treme weather effects such as droughts, floods, heat waves, strong winds, storms, fires, and accumulation of ice
and snow. Engineering Codes and practice intend to provide acceptably low risk of failures in serviceability, durabil-
ity and safety throughout the service life of such infrastructure and services.
Civil Engineers must now apply their knowledge to also find durable ways of providing social welfare consistent
with respect to the natural environment. Designing sustainable solutions to address society’s infrastructure needs
require proper understanding of the natural processes, in order to assess any possible environmental impacts be-
fore its implementation and , if needed, propose the mitigation or protective measures needed. Proper internaliza-
tion of environmental costs is to be included to any economic analysis in addition to any direct or indirect costs, as
such environmental costs are generally supported overall by the community without being accounted on other
stakeholders.
Therefore, we, Civil Engineers, need to incorporate into our professional body of knowledge the disciplines which
enable the inclusion of sustainability criteria for climate action and environment to be included in any multicriteria
alternative assessment along with other more traditionally considered criteria (economic, geomorphological, ge-
otechnical, hydraulic, structural . . . ).
Territory in its natural state, in addition to presenting natural risk factors (flood, fire, lightning, volcanic eruptions,
storms in the sea and coasts, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc. ) has a limited hosting capability, with human develop-
ment requiring action on the territory, of which a large share falls under the commission of Civil Engineers to study
and implement.
A large share of United Nation’s 17 Strategic Development Goals -SDGs are deeply linked with the practice of Civil
Engineering:
P A G E 4 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Goal 6 - "Ensuring the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all"
Goal 7 - "Ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all"
Goal 9 - "Building resilient infrastructure, promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster inno-vation"
Goal 11 - "Making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable "
Goal 13 - "Take urgent measures to combat climate change and its impacts"
Goal 14 - "Conserve and sustainably use oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development"
Goal 15 - "Protect, restore and promote the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation and halt the loss of biodiversity"
It should also be noted that ensuring adequate water quality is a goal which is horizontal to other goals objectives,
such as Goal 3 "Ensure healthy lives and promote the well-being for all at all ages ".
We also align ourselves with the Paris Agreements presented at the Conference of the Parties, COP-21 December
2015, recognizing the need for a progressive and effective response to the urgent threat of climate change, on the
basis of the best available science.
COP-21 Agreements aim to revert global average temperature to no more than 2° C over pre-industrial levels and
drive efforts to reduce such limit to just 1.5° over pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would therefore sub-
stantially reduce the risks and effects of climate change and improve our adaptability to climate changes’ im-
pacts and promote low Green House Gases - GHG emissions driven development.
The implementation of the Paris Agreement, requires the workings a Subsidiary Scientific and Technological Advi-
sory Body to which several important tasks should be entrusted such as the development of specific working pro-
grams and action plans regarding several aspects of the Paris agreement. Engineering contribution to such body is
to be necessarily and should be channelled through WFEO and its member organizations.
THE ROLE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
In a globalized world, in which the civil engineering profession contributes decisively to improve the quality of life of
mankind, it is necessary to establish sound partnerships between those who share common interests, for the bene-
fit of our professional Engineers and society as a whole .
Due to this, we advocate the need for the existence and irreplaceable role of Civil Engineering Professional Associ-
ations to
a. promote adequate broad-based training of at least 5 to be expanded throughout the professional life through
continuous professional development.
b. regulate the civil engineering practice for the sake of society.
c. provide continuing professional education to its members.
d. enforce ethical and deontological codes of practice ensuring: honouring public interest; security and protection
against impostors; efficient use of natural resources; environment protection; vulnerability reduction to natural
disasters and climate change (in their dual role of mitigation and adaptation)
e. contribute to the prevention of corruption (zero tolerance)
f. cluster the different professional groups involved in civil engineering
We want to become present in society, interacting with all stakeholders to understand their needs, helping them in
providing the best response and vindicating our role and function.
We know it is necessary to have some international platforms to position us well in a global world, to facilitate soli-
darity knowledge and experience transfer and professional mobility of Civil Engineers, in a context in which albeit
local variations, there is a growing need for civil engineers worldwide.
OUR COMMITMENT
The signatories representing a large share of the more than 8.000.000 Civil Engineers in the world, consider civil
engineering as a profession of public service and because of this we commit ourselves to:
Assert the ethical commitment towards society of the Civil Engineering professionals over any other influence that may risk independent judgement and professional dignity.
Enforce ethical codes of practice ensuring: the honouring public interest, protection against unlicensed practice; efficient use of natural resources; environment protection; vulnerability reduction to natural disasters
and climate change (in their dual role of mitigation and adaptation)
Foster links between the civil engineering community and society, promoting greater participation and commitment to sustainable development and climate action.
Support the COP-21 Paris Agreement on climate and of many of United Nations Strategic Development
P A G E 5 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Goals and its 169 associated targets through the implementation of innovative technologies and engi-
neering practices, looking forward to the implementation of cost-effective technologies, providing solu-
tions based on sound engineering criteria and robust climate projections, in order to mitigate the rate and
magnitude of climate change and its inevitable impact on society and quality of life.
Follow the codes of practice adopted by the World Federation of Engineering Organizations (Code Of prac-tice for sustainable development and environmental protection "Think global, act local" of 2013, "Code Of
Good Practice: Principles of Climate Change Adaptation for Engineers", 2015) and developing them specif-
ic to each local environment.
Enrich Civil Engineering body of knowledge by broadening its education in disciplines natural sciences and economic analysis, risk management and climate change impact assessment, encouraging continuous
professional development and knowledge updating in these fields.
Convey to society the leading role of the Engineer in preventing natural hazards and sustainable land management, communicating effectively the needs in these areas.
Bolster R&D + i projects regarding sustainability and climate action, in the relationship between actions on the territory with the use and conservation of natural resources and environmental protection, risk manage-
ment and corrective and compensatory actions monitoring for the creation of methodologies to be enrich fu-
ture performance analysis through experimental data.
Celebrate congresses, workshops, courses, conferences and meetings in which the principles and commitments contained in this Declaration are fostered and its application in the different areas of activity
of Civil Engineers.
Contribute through our practice in achieving the following objectives
a. The reduction of Greenhouse Gases - GHG emissions among diverse sectors through regional and
local action.
b. Improved climate resilience resistance of various types of infrastructure to withstand climate im-
pacts, and increase their reliability and service lifecycle during extreme weather events.
c. The achievement of the engineering challenges for the accomplishment of sustainable develop-
ment, directly linked to United Nations SDGs.
11. Collaborate with our scientific and technological partners to achieve the desired results through methods
and techniques such as systems thinking; the development of international standards and codes of practice;
conducting climate risk assessment as part of normal practice; and the adequate assessment of social, eco-
nomic and environmental impacts.
12. Cooperate actively with the respective national governments in order to:
a. Design and develop, jointly with the education authorities, education programs and training cur-
ricula to provide sound civil engineers to assume their significant responsibility towards society
on topics such as sustainable development and climate action.
b. Develop and implement infrastructure investment plans to create the most feasible sustainable
development through continuous and steady pluriannual planning, independent from political cycles.
c. Foster the participation of reputed engineers in decision making either in technical or political po-
sitions.
Madrid, March 2016
Inte
rnatio
na
l C
on
fere
nc
e
of
Civ
il E
ng
ine
erin
g
-
Mad
rid D
ecla
ratio
n s
ign
ato
ries
P A G E 6 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
SAVE THE DATE!
The 64th ECCE General Meeting will take place on 21 - 22 October 2016, in Athens, Greece hosted by the Associ-
ation of Civil Engineers of Greece in cooperation with the Technical Chamber of Greece.
On Saturday 22 October the elections for the new ECCE Executive Board 2016-2018 will be held.
Stay updated through our website here.
64th ECCE General Meeting Announcement
21st - 22nd October 2016, Athens, Greece
Be an ECCE Member (EUCivEng)
ECCE Individual Membership The European Civil Engineer
The profession of the Civil Engineering is mostly
performed where the construction is being made, in
Europe or in any part of the world.
Today, within the European Union, construction
companies have activities in many countries, so civil
engineers have to move to foreign countries and to
work all over Europe.
To allow this professional movement EU published a
Directive on Professional Mobility, to facilitate the
recognition of Civil Engineers across Europe.
Nevertheless the Directive considers under this title,
professionals with quite different academic or pro-
http://www.ecceengineers.eu/news/2016/64_ecce_meeting.php?id=41http://www.ecceengineers.eu/news/2016/Card-presentation.pdf
P A G E 7 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
fessional backgrounds, what can lead to unclear situations for society.
The EU Directive on Mobility proposes the creation of a European Database of Civil Engineers, interconnected
through national organizations.
ECCE appeared in1985 to promote the quality of Civil Engineering with a professional recognition where academic/
professional quality is guaranteed by the national organizations.
ECCE as representative of those organizations, and to promote quality in professional recognition, is opening its
membership to individual members, allowing for their image recognition as European Civil Engineers.
Join ECCE, be a EUCivEng!
ECCE goals:
To present in Brussels the views of the European civil engineers.
(ECCE participates in the High Level Tripartite Forum for Construction in EU)
To establish international contacts with other associations.
(ASCE, JSCE, KSCE, ECCREDI, Mediterranean countries, etc.)
To promote the relevant professional information across Europe
(Publication of e-journal, books, reports, etc.)
To organize Conferences across Europe about Civil Engineering
(See the conferences presentations in ECCE website)
May I become an Individual ECCE Member?
Yes, although ECCE is an association of national organizations, individual civil engineers may also be Individual
Associate Members,with access to all the information and discussion forums, but they may not vote in ECCE Gen-
eral Assemblies.
Being an ECCE individual member you will have the reference EuCivEng
And you get also the ECCE membership card !
The ECCE card identifies you, through your national organization, as a Professional of Civil Engineering in your
country and a EUCivEng in ECCE.
It is expected that in the future the card will allow an automatic civil engineering identification across Europe,
according to the EU Mobility Directive, when national
organizations implement their database of Civil Engineers.
What do I get as an ECCE Individual Member?
If you just want to be an ECCE member, you will receive:
The e-journal and all relevant information from EU Commission
If you want to come to our meetings, you will get:
Participation in 2 International conferences per year;
Participation in 2 General assemblies per year;
Participation in Brussels Engineers Day each 3 years;
To be in contact with civil engineers across Europe (EU and nonEU).
But if you want to be really active,
You are welcome to participate in the discussion forums or to propose position papers to be submitted tο
Brussels.
P A G E 8 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
How can I become an ECCE Individual Member?
Please send to ECCE headquarters ([email protected]):
1. Registration Form
2. Document from your ECCE National Organization
3. Excel sheet with your information + Photo
After receiving the notification of acceptance proceed to the Payment Details.
What are the Payment Details?
To be an ECCE individual member there is an anual fee of 20 euros.
If you are older than 65 you pay only once 30 euros and you become member with unlimited validity.
You can pay in packages of 3 years (60 euros) or 5 years (100 euros),
plus 5 euros, with each package, for mail and printing of a new card.
. The payment should be sent by bank transfer to:
1. Bank: National Westminster Bank plc, Charing Cross Branch
2. IBAN: GB28 NWBK 6072 1408 5260 60
3. BIC: NWBK GB 2L
4. Account name: European Council of Civil Engineers
After payment send a copy of the bank transfer with all the other documents.
(if your membership is not accepted you will be reimbursed)
Join us now!
Become an ECCE Member (EUCivEng)
4th Meeting of the High Level Tripartite Forum
14th April 2016, Brussels On 14th April 2016, the 4th Meeting of the High Level Tripartite Strategic Forum was held in Brussels. The Meeting
was chaired by Mr. Antti Peltomäki, Deputy Director-General, DG for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship
and SMEs.
Introduction and objectives of the meeting
The 4th Meeting of the Construction 2020 High Level Tripartite Strategic Forum was an opportunity to take stock of
the implementation of the Construction 2020 Action Plan, to identify where progress has been and made and where
further efforts are required. Equally, in view of the proposed mid-term review in 2017, it was an opportune moment
to give early consideration to the future orientation and possible revision of the Action Plan.
In addition, the Meeting was intended to support preparation of the forthcoming Ministerial Conference on Construc-
tion that the European Commission will organise with the Slovak Presidency, which will take place in Bratislava on
15-16 September 2016. The Meeting provided, therefore, an opportunity for the Forum to identify and highlight
developments and issues that could be ‘brought to the table’ at the Ministerial Conference.
The Ministerial Conference will be organised around two main topics, which are mirrored in the agenda of the Fo-
rum Meeting. The first considered the construction sector’s interrelations with the broad sweep of EU-level cross-
sectoral policy initiatives. The second focused on strengthening the business environment for construction so as to
support performance improvements and increase the sector’s competitiveness.
mailto:[email protected]://www.ecceengineers.eu/news/2016/1_Registration-Form.docxhttp://www.ecceengineers.eu/news/2016/2_Data-for-ECCE-Card.xlsxhttp://www.ecceengineers.eu/news/2016/ecce_card.phphttp://www.ecceengineers.eu/news/2016/ecce_card.php
P A G E 9 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Reporting on the main discussion points
Rapporteur: Mr Jan Maarten de Vet, Ecorys
Sustainability in construction: closing the gap
Boosting the attractiveness of the construction indus-
try (‘Appeal’)
A need to further improve the attractiveness and
image of the construction sector (as a high tech sector –
Smart construction?)
Not as an aim but a tool to close the skills gap along the value chain (‘defuse the skills time bomb’)
Make apprenticeships work (e.g. apprenticeship pledge initiative, apprenticeship ‘ambassadors’, ‘youth for
construction’, learning from practices in other MS)
Recruiting beyond standard target groups – including women and young people (role models)
A need to associate the sector more to trust, confidence and quality (e.g. step up inspections, Master Builder
Awards, certificates)
A dilemma: public versus private quality control
Bring in the consumer dimension in the sector– boost consumer confidence and trust in the sector (e.g. insur-
ance-backed warranties, guarantees/certificates)
Sustainability in construction: closing the gap
Buildings and infrastructure as enabler (‘Holistic’)
Buildings and infrastructure are taken for granted – they should not as buildings do not last forever and as
there is a building mismatch (health and safety, energy efficiency in existing buildings)
A need for a life cycle approach and apply circular economy principles – a large share of building costs relate
to operation and maintenance
A need to look at costs and benefits of measures across the whole value chain; much information is lost and
much scope for spectacular gains (BIM)
Cooperation can pay off: e.g. shared equipment, inter-trade set-up
Digital technologies can help to improve productivity along the value chain: but roll-out of BIM requires com-
patibility of software, standardisation and training
A need to see how the sector can better contribute to broader policy goals (e.g. energy efficiency – a need for
full use of tools and instruments e.g. public procurement)
Sustainability in construction: closing the gap
A need to raise innovativeness and productivity, especially amongst SMEs (‘Innovate’)
The good news: European construction is innovative world-wide
A lot of innovation is simple and readily available, but needs to be shared and promoted in order to increase
take-up – technological institutes can help!
P A G E 1 0 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Barriers to innovation: regulation as well as culture (from cost avoidance to gains)
Areas of progress: modular construction, 3D printing, BIM, certification
Innovation in construction is a priority for all stakeholders (including clients) – as it brings about quality and
long term benefits for all
Innovation in work organisation: e.g. sharing of equipment
Digital technologies: much catching-up to do (design, 3D printing, workflow planning) e.g. in public procure-
ment
Implement new tools and techniques: BIM Building Information Management
Building a supportive environment
A need for good governance and good policies (‘Smart’ regulation)
A need for good regulation due to risk, health and safety, energy and resource use, etc.
But also a need to streamline permits and regulation – the way to go
A need to tackle transaction costs
Streamlining building sustainability frameworks
A need to anticipate public investments
Modern public procurement policy implementation requires a change in mind-set of all actors involved
A Single Market for construction can bring competition and drive down costs – need for EU-wide standards
Building a supporting environment
Involve all stakeholders along the policy life cycle (‘Engage’)
A need to strike a balance between business-friendly and consumer friendly
Developing policy (e.g. building regulations) by engaging with stakeholders leads to consensus, prevents
mistakes and supports implementation
Stakeholders include contractors, suppliers, designers, operators/building maintenance and consumers
(affordability)
Transparency pays off (e.g. participative planning, market consultation in public procurement)
A crucial role for local and regional governments to align to national strategies
Key conclusion of relevance to the Ministerial conference on Construction
More efforts are needed by all to increase the appeal of the construction sector and to contribute to moderni-
sation – and make use of existing good practices in MS
Reach out beyond traditional stakeholders: media, consumers, women, youth
A holistic approach helps the construction sector itself but also to contribute to economic and society (‘to do
good’)
P A G E 1 1 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Construction sector a major ally for building the circular economy (life cycle costing)
Innovation is key - much scope remains for increasing the take-up of innovation: ICT and BIM, Alliances for
Innovation (Smart Construction)
Good practices exist amongst MS governments to coordinate policies affecting the construction sector; a need
to share and promote these
Better buildings and infrastructure require that modern public procurement policies are effectively implemented
at all levels (e.g. resource efficiency criteria, life-cycle assessment, cost measurement, etc.)
A Single Market for construction can bring competition as well as innovation – but requires EU-wide stand-
ards?
Involving all stakeholders in policy preparation results in better rules (including consumers)
A need to promote synergies between EU and MS initiatives
Agenda and presentation of the 4th HLF meeting can be found here.
TTIP negotiations: A draft framework for the civil
engineering community Update April 13th, 2016
Discussions during the 12th round of negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
took place in Brussels between 22nd – 26th February and covered all three pillars of the agreement – i.e. market
access, the regulatory cluster and rules. During such negotiation rounds, a preliminary discussion of the feasibility
of bringing to the negotiation rounds the mobility for professional services was brought up by the EU negotiating
team. US team accepted to explore such potential during the following negotiation rounds. Such information was
received through the Spanish Government due to their direct line with the EU negotiating team the day before the
celebration of ECCE’s 63rd General Assembly in Madrid.
The following week, ECCE was invited to the TTIP Virtual dialogue that was promoted by the US Embassy and the
European Commission Representations to their respective EU countries. Such event was held on March 10th simul-
taneously and broadcasted to all EU countries. No further information was provided regarding topics of ECCE inter-
ests in the question round presented to both heads of the negotiation teams.
On March 22, we were contacted by the Spanish Government. We were informed that the head of the EU negotia-
tion team, Ignacio García Bercero had met with Spanish officials, whom presented ECCE’s views on civil engineer-
ing professional mobility. Due to their lack of specifics in their conversation, Mr. Bercero requested an executive
summary of both ECCE’s interests and concerns on the topic, and any potential guidelines on the items that will be
brought up if the topics arrive at the negotiation table. He also requested the potential replicability and broadening
of this topic to other branches of engineering.
On these grounds, we compiled the issues which are now being discussed by both the Texas Board of Professional
Engineers - TBPE and Spanish Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos regarding their potential
professional mobility bilateral agreement. TBPE’s professional framework basics are concurrent with US federal
model and all US Free Trade Agreements Mutual Recognition Agreements - MRA such as North America’s Free
Trade Agreement - NAFTA and AUSFTA - Australia’s Free Trade Agreement and Colegio’s framework basics also
lie within EU’s regulations framework.
Such document was presented on March 25th and was disseminated among EU’s negotiation team by Mr. Bercero.
For the time being, we have received no feedback on the topic by the European Commission. We are still pending a
meeting with the negotiators’ assigned to our area of interest. I presume we will be able to hold such meeting during
the month of April, as Brussels’ bombings have impacted such scheduling.
In addition to this, I was informed that both European International Contractors and the European Federation of
Engineering Consultancy Associations (EFCA) are working in further recommendations regarding the scope of
http://www.ecceengineers.eu/news/2016/4_hlf_meeting.php?id=41
P A G E 1 2 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
negotiations.
Hereby I enclose the document requested by the Eu negotiating team. Such document must have served well the
teams as EU’s chief negotiator has stated the following in his conclusion statement to 13th TTIP rounds held from
April 25 – April 29, 2016 in New York, NY.
We also made some progress in discussions on services. The EU's objective is to pursue a high degree of ambition
and gain substantial new market access for EU firms. We also had a good discussion on mutual recognition agree-
ments for professional services and made significant progress in the consolidation of the text. Finally, we had ex-
tensive discussions on public procurement. Here, we started to consolidate our respective texts. But for us, it is
clear that we need to reach a similar level of progress in access to procurement markets as in tariffs and services in
order to move the negotiations to the end game.
At least, the topic is on the negotiation table, much more than expected one year ago. It is a long journey to
achieve professional mobility between the EU and the US, but any journey begins with a first stride.
José Francisco Sáez
ECCE Executive Board Member
May 3rd, 2016
Our Interests
The interest of the European Council of Civil Engineers is to safeguard the quality of professional practice of civil
engineering on both sides of the Atlantic. Its aim is to stimulate regulatory frameworks for professional temporary
mobility, less demanding but more specific, as is the case implementing Directive 2013/55 / EU and its predeces-
sor the 2005/36 / EC on the recognition of professional qualifications. Trying to accomplish maximalist goals on
recognition systems for full recognition on the same terms as a national professional may become very difficult
because of the existence of at least two professional examinations in the US model.
Furthermore, given the exposure of the civil engineering sector to public procurement, is also in our interest to
eliminate or reduce administrative barriers requiring full-licensed native professionals as private representative of
such contracts in both territories.
Our Concerns
ECCE’s main concern regards the compliant professional practice of civil engineering according to the national
regulatory framework, as is common to other professions. This fact, although not directly related to the professional
activity, may have impact in event of any claims or litigation and if so, will require a technical and not exclusively
regulatory analysis. Otherwise the effective implementation of this treaty in the field of civil engineering will be
undermined.
Related to this, another concern present in the civil engineering community draws attention to the possible impacts
arising from the lack of knowledge regarding both civil and criminal liability of professional practice in the territory of
application and the difficulties for European SMEs to access the specific insurance sector in US.
Last but not least, and although not directly related to the treaty itself, another concern refers to the potential ineffi-
cient implementation of the treaty in its administrative aspect. For this reason, it is in our best interest that profes-
sional chambers and competent authorities become directly involved in the works to develop such framework aim-
ing a streamlined procedure for the applicant.
Objective of negotiations
The aim of the TTIP negotiations regarding this topic according to the European Council of Civil Engineers is
achieving a temporary license mechanism on the following terms:
Rights
Full licensure for foreign professionals in host country for
a) temporary period / b) duration of the project.
The b option would be more restrictive in activity but easier to implement.
Corresponding immigration status during the duration of such professional activity.
Ability to assume contractual assignment for public procurement contracts.
It may be necessary to identify contract amount thresholds as well as applicable administration bodies for this
capability. Currently the procurement thresholds for publication in the OJ are € 6 million in the case of execu-
tion of works and 134000 € in the case of supply contracts by state authorities.
P A G E 1 3 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Requirements
Knowledge of the language of the destination country.
Although obvious, should be explicit.
Professional license in force in country of origin.
Those countries in which the engineering profession is not regulated may be required to provide additional
information. Such item may be certified by professional chambers.
Minimum high education degrees leading to professional activity and substantial equivalence of the same duration.
Under this heading underlies the existence of two different professional levels in Europe (engineering and
technical engineering) compared to a only level of professional training in US (PE). This requirement may be
linked to the minimum professional experience for a harmonized application for both professional level li-
cense.
Minimum professional experience overall to qualify for application.
The European legislation is more lax in this respect requiring only two years of professional to apply for pro-
fessional mobility mechanisms. Other similar agreements require a five year minimum. In any case, this deci-
sion has potential immigration implications, since lower minimum experience requirement increase the
chance of free establishment in the host country.
Professional experience in host country
The minimum possible. The different existing frameworks in US require at least one year of experience in
destination. This experience requirement may be influence the duration for the temporary license according to
thresholds of contract and professional experience.
Identification of specific expertise regarding the host project.
Only applicable in the case of choosing the option b) temporary license linked to project
Education in country specific legislation, professional responsibility and professional ethics This training could be given either on arrival or even before and provided in origin by the competent authori-
ties, professional chambers or licensing boards. This training could obviated if experience is credited on arri-
val.
Conclusions
The prioritization of the characteristics of goals far exceeds the scope of the document. The European Council of
Civil Engineers offers the negotiating team for the TTIP its collaboration and assistance in clarifying any points of
the document as well as any other work that they can consider of interest.
Should you require further information on the topic, please contact ECCE Secretariat.
Consultation on the Fitness Check for the Construction Sector
The European Commission has launched a public consultation to gather the experience, views and opinions of
interested stakeholders and the public on the impact of current EU legislation for the construction sector.
Policy fields
Industrial policy: Construction sector
Impacts of EU legislation relating to Internal Market, Energy Efficiency, Environment, Health and Safety
Target group(s)
All: construction industry, middle-sized and micro enterprises, industry associations, public authorities, EU coun-
try authorities, private organisations, trade unions, consultancies, other relevant stakeholders and citizens are wel-
come to contribute to this consultation.
Period of consultation
From 29 March 2016 to 20 June 2016.
Objective of the consultation
The aim of this consultation is to gather the experience, views and opinions of interested stakeholders and the
public on the impact of current EU legislation for the construction sector. It asks about key procedures and issues
mailto:[email protected]
P A G E 1 4 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
affected by these legal instruments. The results will feed into the Fitness Check for the Construction Sector under-
taken by the Commission which is expected to be completed by the end of 2016.
The Fitness Check is part of the Commission's Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT). It in-
volves a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of whether the current regulatory framework is proportionate
and fit for purpose, and delivering as expected. Specifically, it assesses the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency,
coherence and EU added value of the abovementioned legislative framework.
Background
The construction sector is at the heart of the Europe 2020 strategy and is one of the keys to unlocking the 2020
vision for smart and sustainable growth and jobs. More than any other sector, the performance of the construction
sector determines the development of the overall economy: not only does it generate almost 9% of GDP and pro-
vides 18 million direct jobs in the EU, construction consumes about €800 billion of intermediate products from vari-
ous industrial sectors. The construction sector has been hit particularly hard by the financial and economic crisis. At
the same time, the building sector is facing a number of challenges to mainstream practices to save energy, to
minimise the sector's contribution to man-made climate change, and to minimise its total environmental impact in
terms of emissions, material use, water use and waste generation, which is considerable.
Making buildings more energy- and resource-efficient is increasingly considered an urgent global challenge. Build-
ings are responsible for 40% of total final energy use, and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions in EU countries. Im-
proving energy efficiency in buildings therefore represents important cost-effective potential for meeting the EU's
targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 and beyond.
To enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of the construction sector in the EU, it is essential to ensure a
properly and effectively functioning Internal Market for construction products and services, with a clear and pre-
dictable legal framework. It is also necessary to ensure that administrative and compliance costs are proportionate
to the objectives pursued by the legislative acts.
In 2010, 13.4 million people were employed in the construction sector in the EU. Making them, and the rest of the
workforce, safe in their working environment, and doing this in a way that protects workers without raising costs to
businesses more than is necessary (which could lead to significant job losses) is a key social objective of EU legis-
lation.
Protecting the environment across the EU and beyond is an urgent responsibility. The construction and use of
buildings in the EU account for about half of all our extracted materials and energy consumption, about one third of
water consumption, and generates about one third of all waste. Requiring control and minimisation of the waste we
produce and making sure that major projects consider the environment through assessing possible impacts before
a project is implemented are essential steps to realise resource efficiency gains and to protect our environment that
is essential to maintain prosperity and high quality of life.
Therefore, the present public consultation offers a unique opportunity for society to provide direct feedback, identi-
fying some of the main success factors, shortcomings or unintended effects offered by the legal framework.
Scope of the consultation
The Fitness Check focuses on 15 EU legislative texts in the policy fields of Internal Market, Energy Efficiency, Envi-
ronment and Health & Safety - and, more specifically, on those provisions within these EU texts that may impact
the construction sector. This public consultation asks about key procedures and issues affected by these instru-
ments.
In particular, the open public consultation includes questions relating to the following EU legislative texts:
Construction Products Regulation (No 305/2011)
Professional Qualifications Directive (2005/36/EC)
Services Directive (2006/123/EC)
Late Payments Directive (2011/7/EU)
Energy Efficiency Directive (2012/27/EU)
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (2010/31/EU)
Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC)
Energy Labelling Directive (2010/30/EU)
Renewable Energy Sources Directive (2009/28/EC)
Occupational Safety and Health Framework Directive (89/391/EEC)
Directive on the Manual Handling of Loads (90/269/EEC)
Directive on Temporary or Mobile Construction Sites (92/57/EEC)
Asbestos Directive (2009/148/EC)
http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/refit/index_en.htm
P A G E 1 5 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC)
Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (2011/92/EU)
Questionnaire structure
This open public consultation begins with an introduction followed by two main sections, each asking questions on
a group of EU legal acts in the areas of Internal Market and Energy Efficiency, and Environment and Health & Safe-
ty respectively. Each main section has various subsections.
Three sets of questions have been elaborated in order to gather the most relevant information from various stake-
holders.
Please fill in the questionnaire until 20 June 2016!
To answer online or to download the PDF version, please click on the relevant link.
a. I am answering as a citizen.
b. I am answering as a professional in the construction sector (e.g. employee, self-employed, entrepreneur) or
on behalf of an organisation/institution/company
c. I am answering on behalf of/as an employee of a public authority.
Consultation on proposal to introduce a Services Passport and address
regulatory barriers in the construction and business services sectors
In the beginning of May the European Commission published a public consultation on the proposal to intro-
duce a services passport and address regulatory barriers in the construction and business services sectors, and
possible action to address barriers in the insurance sector.
This consultation stems from the Single Market Strategy which announced several actions to further develop the
single market for services, in particular:
1. An initiative introducing a services passport for key economic sectors;
2. An action to address regulatory barriers for key business services and for construction services;
3. An action on insurance requirements for business and construction service providers.
To access the relevant questionnaire, as well as additional background information concerning the initiatives please
visit the link here.
The consultation will run for a period of 12 weeks, until 26 July.
Your contribution, as well as those of any stakeholders which you may find relevant, would be appreciated.
https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/FitnessCheckfortheConstructionSector-questionnaireforcitizenshttps://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/OpenpublicconsultationFitnessCheckfortheConstructionSector-questionnaireforprofessionalshttps://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/OpenpublicconsultationFitnessCheckfortheConstructionSector-questionnaireforpublicauthoritieshttp://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=8796&lang=en&title=Consultation-on-proposal-to-introduce-a-Services-Passport-and-address-regulatory-barriers-in-the-construction-and-business-services-sectors
P A G E 1 6 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
On 28-29 January 2016, the President of ECCE Wlodzimierz Szymczak took part in
the 24th Bavarian Day of Engineering organized in Munich by The Bavarian Chamber
of Civil Engineers.
At the first day of his visit W. Szymczak had a meeting with Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Schroe-
ter, the President of the Bavarian Chamber of Civil Engineers. During this cordial and
direct meeting President Szymczak presented to his interlocutor current works and
plans of ECCE with emphasis on New Strategy which was started to be implement
into practice a few months ago. Finally, he directed to President Schroeter an offer for
Bavarian Chamber of Civil Engineers to join The European Council of Civil Engineers
as a Full Member representing Germany in this organization. The proposal was ac-
cepted as a very interesting and promising one. Parties agreed further steps which
would be taken on that matter.
29 of January started from official celebration of the 24th Bavarian Day of Engineer-
ing. It was an impressive meeting which was attended by over eight hundred invited
guests from Germany and from abroad.
After the official celebration of the 24th Bavarian Day of Engineering, President
Szymczak met with Klaus Thuriedl with whom he discussed the progress and current
state of relations between Austrian Civil Engineers and ECCE.
This long and busy day ended with the meeting of President Szymczak and Hermann
Sturm - President of ZDI, which is ECCE Associate Member. The meeting was devoted mainly to discussing New
Strategy for ECCE and opportunities to increase ZDI participation in the work of our organization.
News from ECCE and other organizations
ECCE President in Munich
From left to right: Hein-
rich Schroeter, Wlodzimi-
erz Szymczak,
Polish Infrastructure 2016 event ECCE President Wlodzimierz Szymczak was invited to participate in the “Polish Infra-
structure 2016” Conference that took place on 23rd February 2016, in Warsaw, Poland.
The conference is the most prestigious meeting of the leaders of infrastructure industry
with exceptional reputation in the market, which every year attracts the most important
representatives of the sector. Current edition was organized under the auspices of the
Mayor of Warsaw. The Forum, which enjoys great recognition of business environment,
was an opportunity to discuss issues related to public procurement, the landscape after
the extension of the Warsaw Metro.
Discussants assessed the chances of a faster implementation of the commitments on
the closure of Polish motorways construction and predict trends for Polish railways de-
velopment.
ECCE President was invited as a Special Guest and he delivered a speech titled “Why do we have to develop and
modernize infrastructure in Poland and why we need to do this now?”.
Meeting with the Association of Civil Engineers of Greece On the occasion of ECCE President’s visit in Athens as panel member at
the Round Table on “Updated Information on Regulations for Architects
and Civil Engineers Professional Practice and Education on the Interna-
tional level”, a meeting at the headquarters of the Association of the Civil
Engineers of Greece – ECCE Secretariat office was organized on 4th April
2016. The meeting was attended by the following:
Wlodzimierz Szymczak, President of the European Council of Civil Engineers (ECCE)
Vasilios Bardakis, President of the Association of Civil Engineers of Greece (ACEG),
Demetris Koutsoyiannis, Dean of the School of Civil Engineering in the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA)
Constantine Memos Director of the American Society of Civil Engi-neers for Region 10 (International,
Fro
m
left
to
righ
t: V
asilio
s
Bard
akis
,
Wlo
dzim
ierz
Szym
czak
P A G E 1 7 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Chris Tokas representative of the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) and Director for OSHPD, the organization that oversees California Hospital construction and seismic regulations
Christos Damvergis, President of the Hellenic Society of Hydraulic Engineers (SMYE).
The main topic of discussion during this meeting was
the situation of the Civil Engineering profession in
Greece, in Europe and in the USA with emphasis being
put on the particular circumstances that we have been
facing in Greece and in Europe the past few years of
the financial crisis.
ECCE President introduced briefly the European Coun-
cil of Civil Engineers to the members of the discussion
and described the new goals that have been set and
the initiatives that ECCE has started implementing. The
concept of the ECCE Individual membership and the
ECCE Card was discussed as well as the need for
ECCE’s presence in Brussels. ECCE President
thanked the ACEG President for his invitation and also
for hosting the ECCE Secretariat. Overall, it has been a
very successful meeting.
On the same day ECCE President had the chance to pay a visit to the grave of the late ECCE past President and
friend Vassilis Economopoulos.
From left to right: Chris Tokas, Christos Damvergis,
Demetris Koutsoyannis, Wlodzimierz Szymczak,
Vasilios Bardakis, Constantine Memos
Round Table on “Updated Information on Regulations for Architects and Civil
Engineers Professional Practice and Education on the International level”
The Round Table Round Table on “Updated Infor-
mation on Regulations for Architects and Civil Engi-
neers Professional Practice and Education on the Inter-
national level” was held on 5th April 2016, in Athens,
Greece organized by the Technical Chamber of
Greece. ECCE President was invited by the TCG Presi-
dent Mr. Giorgos Stasinos and by the President of the
Association of Civil Engineers of Greece Mr. Vasilis
Bardakis to take part in this Round Table as one of the
panel members. The two moderators of the Round
Table were Mr. Vasilis Bardakis, ACEG President, and
Mr. Nikos Fintikakis, Elected Council Member of the
International Union of Architects (UIA) and Director of
JCEP-UIA.
The panel consisted of the following persons:
Professor Memos Constantinos, Director of the American Society of Civil Engineers for Region 10 (all countries outside USA)
Professor Ramos Fernando, Director of the UIA Educational Committee
Mr. Szymczak Wlodzimierz, President of the European Council of Civil Engineers
Mr. Tokas Chris, Representative of the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC)
Mr. Vonier Tomas, President of the American Institute of Architects and UIA S.G.
Speeches were also given by Mr. Aris Chatzidakis, Member of the International Affairs Committee of TCG, TCG
representative in FEANI and ECCE and by Mrs. Tonia Katerini, President of the Greek Association of Architects.
The Round Table started with the speech of the President of the Technical Chamber of Greece, Mr. Giorgos Stasi-
nos who welcomed everyone and expressed his gratitude to the speakers that accepted the invitation to share their
experience and knowledge about the profession of the Architect and the Civil Engineer. He outlined the profession-
al practice of the two specialties. He said that in this time of crisis we ought to create a new plan for the develop-
ment of the country, the Associations and also as individuals. He stressed that the TCG is trying to resist to the so
called deregulation of the Engineering Profession which is not a local issue only. At an EU level we are aware of
the issues about the Qualification and Services and the Directives that rule the Single Market. Similar issues have
been tackled successfully by Engineering Professional Organizations abroad and especially in the USA. He said
that we have to examine the best practices that were implemented abroad, to protect he Engineering Profession in
From left to right: Wlodzimierz Szymczak, Constan-
tine Memos, Chris Tokas, Giorgos Stasinos, Tomas
Vonier, Fernando Ramos
P A G E 1 8 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Greece, to communicate the social aspect of the profession and what the Engineers offer to the society. He con-
cluded that our goal is to minimize the loss and the damage that might come from unbridled competition and to plan
for the future and within this context the TCG organized this event.
The event was divided in two sessions. The first session was moderated by Mr. Nikos Fintikakis, Elected Council
Member of the International Union of Architects (UIA) and Director of JCEP-UIA and the lecturers that come from
the Architects side delivered their speeches and presentations. The second session was moderated by Mr. Vasilis
Bardakis, ACEG President with lecturers coming from the Civil Engineering side. The sessions were followed by
questions and discussion time.
Below you can find the main points and conclusions of the presentation that were delivered..
Civil Engineers
Wlodzimierz Szymczak, President of the European Council of Civil Engineers (ECCE)
OVERVIEW OF REGULATION IN EUROPE
Internationally Civil Engineers provide a wide range of activities (ECCE Civil Engineering Charter)
In Seismic Regions certain fundamental principles must be taken into account in order to arrive at a structural concept that is considered sound for the earthquake resistance (e.g. EN1998)
Examples of shared Activities with Architects (submission of construction related documents, drawing up of designs, management of building projects)
A lot of Greek Civil Engineers act as Building Engineers
Constantine Memos, Director of ASCE Region 10 (International)
VISION for Civil Engineering
GLOBAL ISSUES (Water & Sanitation, Sustainable Energy, Resilient infrastructure, Resilient and Sustainable Cities)
Civil Engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as:
- Master planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine—the built
environment
- Master stewards of the natural environment and its resources
- Master innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public, private, and academic sectors
- Managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents, and other threats
- Leaders in discussions and decisions shaping public environmental and infrastructure policy
The future path for licensure goes beyond the bachelor degree (master’s in engineering degree – OR – addi-tional 30 semester credits of advanced education)
A strong licensure process is required (experience + professional exams)
Chris Tokas, representative of SEAOC (Structural Engineering Association of California)
Professional Practice Laws and Requirements For Seismic Design of Buildings and Other Structures in
California
Building Design Authority (Shared activities between Architects, Civil Engineers, Structural Engineers)
Foundation Pillars for Performance (Codes & Standards, Detailed Plan View, Field Inspection, Materials Quali-ty Control)
Seismic Performance of Nonstructural Components (building contents, service equipment, utilization equip-ment, interior/exterior architectural components)
Architects
Tomas Vonier: a strong licensure process is required (3 years’ experience + professional exams)
Fernando Ramos: The EC Directives of 2013 and in particular Article 46 which defines the minimum training standards for architecture gives a very negative image in comparison with the European architecture educa-
tion
P A G E 1 9 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Summer is coming and the time for WCCE's General Assembly comes nearer. This
time WCCE is travelling to America as 11th WCCE's General Assembly will be hosted
by the COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS CIVILES DE COSTA RICA, founding member of
the organization. The activities regarding 11th WCCE General Assembly will be held
from 7th to 10th September 2016 in San José de Costa Rica.
On the occasion of WCCE’s General Assembly, CIC-CFIA will hold its XV Congreso de
Ingeniería Civil.
Further information will be delivered shortly on www.wcce.biz.
World Council of Civil Engineers 11th General Assembly
FIEC/CPE Press Release and Position Papers on Market Surveillance within the
Framework of the Construction Products Regulation
Construction Products Europe and the European Construction Industry Federation, the latter representing contrac-
tors (micro, small, medium and large enterprises), defend the interests of complementary sectors in the construc-
tion value chain. Construction Products Europe members manufacture components that FIEC members install.
These two interdependent sectors and the two European associations that represent them have joined forces to
point out those aspects of the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) that should be improved for the benefit of
both sectors.
Both European industry associations support an open and transparent European standardization system that in-
volves all concerned parties. They welcome European measures that create a level playing field and ensure that
the right product is used in the right circumstances in buildings and infrastructure. Contrary to this, the CPR is influ-
encing the development of standards in a way that neither of these goals is achieved.
Press Release
FIEC/CPE Position Paper on European Product Standards and their relationship to Regulation (EU) N°305/2011 –
Construction Products Regulation
FIEC/CPE Position Paper on Market Surveillance within the Framework of Regulation (EU) N° 305/2011 – Con-
struction Products Regulation
ABC for Sustainable Cities The "ABC for Sustainable Cities" is published by UNEP (United Nations Environ-
ment Programme) and UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Pro-
gramme). It is drawn up with the support of FIDIC in cooperation with EFCA.
The “ABC for Sustainable Cities” is a glossary of key terms related to Sustaina-
ble Cities.
The publication aims to:
1. Provide clarity on the terms and the concepts related to the issues of Sustain-
able Cities, by collecting short definitions from internationally recognised
sources.
2. Support dialogue and cooperation among stakeholders working on Sustaina-
ble Cities, by providing a reference easily accessible by technical and non tech-
nical audience.
The publication does not aim to provide globally agreed definitions, but rather to
compile existing definitions that may continue to evolve over time and with the
input of relevant stakeholders.
The ABC for Sustainable Cities is first of all an exercise of compilation of rele-
vant terms and definitions that are available on the public domain. Definitions have been extracted from official and
internationally recognised sources, documents, reports, journals and other publications edited by international or-
ganisations and institutions.
Click here for the full document.
http://www.actividadescic.org/http://www.actividadescic.org/http://www.wcce.biz/http://www.construction-products.eu/Documents/Document/20160422061330-FIEC-CPE_press_v1.pdfhttp://www.construction-products.eu/Documents/Document/20160422061854-Standardisation.pdfhttp://www.construction-products.eu/Documents/Document/20160422061854-Standardisation.pdfhttp://www.construction-products.eu/Documents/Document/20160422055653-Market_Surveillance.pdfhttp://www.construction-products.eu/Documents/Document/20160422055653-Market_Surveillance.pdfhttp://www.efcanet.org/Portals/EFCA/EFCA%20files/PDF/ABC%20for%20sustainable%20cities_2016.pdf
P A G E 2 0 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
As of 18th April 2016, Member States and their public authorities must comply
with the three Directives on public procurement and concessions adopted in
2014.
Elżbieta Bieńkowska, Commissioner for Internal market, Industry, Entrepre-
neurship and SMEs said:
"Public procurement rules are there to ensure that taxpayers' money that goes
into the public purchase of goods, works and services is well spent. The new
rules will further simplify public tender procedures and render them more flexible to the benefit of SMEs in particu-
lar. They also encourage the shift towards an energy and resource efficient economy alongside the well-
established objective of achieving the best quality-price ratio."
Authorities that have already made the transition to eProcurement report savings between 5% and 20%. Given the
size of the total procurement market in the EU (€ 1.9 trillion per year), each 5% saved could return around €100
billion to the public purse.
More information can be found here.
New EU public procurement rules applicable from 18th April 2016
News from ECCE Members
Limassol Marina, Cyprus
Multi-storey Car Park
Project Owner: Ministry of Energy, Commerce, Industry and Tourism
Project Developer: LIMASSOL MARINA LTD
Project Consultants: ATELIER XAVIER BOHL ● ARTELIA GROUP ● A. F. MODINOS & S. A. VRAHIMIS ● GE-
MAC
(Geotechnical Engineering by Alain YZIQUEL) (Structural Engineering by Michael SHAFTACOLAS)
Project EPC Contractor: J&P – ATHENA – CYBARCO – MARINA LEMESOU JOINT VENTURE
Location and key facts about Limassol Marina
The featured multi storey car park is part of Limassol Marina in Cyprus, a prestigious marina of a total construction
cost of 350 million euros, consisting of villas, apartments, shops, cafes, restaurants, boat and yacht berths, a ma-
rine training school and a cultural centre. It has 650 berths to accommodate yachts from 8m up to 110m at a basin
area of approximately 170,000 square meters. It has a multi storey car park of a capacity of 746 cars that is found-
ed 5m below water level. The scope of this article is to describe the design concept as well as the construction
methods adopted specifically for this car park.
Key facts about Car Park
746 cars ● Total area of 25.000m2 ● 2 un-
derground storeys, ground level and 2 sto-
reys above ground level ● All levels unfold
as a continuous spiral with an average ramp
slope of 1.5% ● Lowest foundation level is at
-5.5m below mean sea level ● South edge of
car park is built on reclaimed land ● 400 (A0,
A1 size) construction drawings where pre-
pared ● Reinforced concrete structure de-
signed to EC2 / EC8 ● Earthquake accelera-
tion Hg=0,25g ● 21.405m3 of C30/37 and
C35/45 of microsilica concrete used ● 2.021
tonnes of B500c reinforcement ● Design –
Build – Operate – Transfer type of Contract
enabled designers and contractor to provide
a mutually agreed type of construction in
advance
Cyprus
Figure 1 - Proximity with open sea
http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=8773
P A G E 2 1 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Basic Design Constraints
The location of the car park is partly in the sea. Therefore, the location and the required depth of excavation – 9m
deep excavation, 5.5m below water level – troubled the designers as to what would be the best solution in order to
provide a safe and dry construction site. The solution adopted, was to construct a perimeter secant pile wall. The
piles would be reinforced concrete piles drilled down to a maximum depth of 14m as described below.
Basic Design Requirements
1. A high degree of water tightness
2. To protect the work force from sudden piping which could lead to fatalities
3. To provide adequate dewatering conditions whilst preventing depletion of a nearby river aquifer that would
disturb nearby building foundations located within a radius of several metres
4. It would act as a retaining wall for the works
5. The secant pile wall would be a temporary structure to allow the construction of the car park and was not de-
signed to give permanent support to the backfill or to resist seismic loads
6. It was not designed to insure the ultimate water tightness of the finished works
Basic Design Concept
The basic concept to achieve the required water tightness was to locate the end of the piles in the proper horizon
i.e. clayey silt that was encountered at a depth of 12m. The dewatering would allow the control of both the seepage
and the gradient of flows finding their path in more gravelly patches.
Foundation Conditions
The Geotechnical investigations consisted of three exploratory boreholes and three exploratory pits.
The following key data was extracted:
1. At the north side of the building the soil encountered at foundation level was gravel and cobbles and silty grav-
elly sand with SPT = 20.
2. At the south side of the building the soil encountered was unsuitable i.e. sea weeds and silty sand.
3. At -8.00m MSL the investigations revealed a layer of sandy and silty clay of very high plasticity and very low
permeability.
The presence of the clay was the most important finding. It gave the designers the idea to design and construct the
perimeter secant pile wall to penetrate this impermeable layer of clay. This meant that with the use of a number of
dewatering pumps, the dewatering of the sea water would be achievable if the rate of dewatering would be equal to
the rate of influent water.
Building overall possible settlement
The excavation of the car park would create an unloading of the foundation. The reloading by the weight of the car
park and the cars would not compensate the stress reduction created by the excavation. Therefore general settle-
ments were not expected and piling was therefore not necessary to prevent an overall settlement. In general the
soil investigations revealed that the ground was suitable for raft foundation while at areas where sea weeds were
located, the easiest solution was to excavate and replace them by a compacted backfill of gravels obtained during
the bulk excavation.
Construction method stages
The proposed construction method was straightforward:
1. Stage 1 – Excavate the footprint of the car park down to elevation 0,6m amsl
2. Stage 2 – Discard the unsuitable material and select gravels to be dumped along the shore line in order to
create working space
3. Stage 3 – Construct a rock fill bund to protect the excavation from waves (See Fig 2, 3 and
4. Stage 4 – Construct the secant pile wall from the platform at 0,6m above mean sea level. The piles were
D880mm, 10m and 14m deep. Primary piles reinforcement was 13Ø22, Spiral Ø12/10.
5. Stage 5 – Excavate the inside of the car park with dewatering
6. Stage 6 – Extend the platform towards the sea using selected gravels and sand material for construction of
the secant piles of the quay wall.
7. Stage 7 – Construction of car park. Dewatering pumps were stopped once the structure weight was balanced
with buoyancy forces.
P A G E 2 2 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
Figure 2 – Design layout of all stages of construction Figure 3 – South side of excavation
Figure 4 – North side of excavation
Construction Timeline
Fig
ure
5 –
Co
ns
truc-
tion
Sta
ge
s 1
, 2 a
nd
3
– R
ecla
matio
n fo
r
wo
rkin
g s
pa
ce a
nd
pro
tectio
n fro
m s
ea
waves
Fig
ure
6 –
Co
ns
truc-
tion
Sta
ge
4 –
Co
n-
stru
ctio
n o
f secan
t pile
wall
Fig
ure
7 –
Co
ns
truc-
tion
Sta
ge
5 –
Co
mp
le-
tion
of e
xcavatio
n w
ith
de
wate
ring
Fig
ure
8 –
Co
ns
truc-
tion
Sta
ge
6 –
Blin
din
g
co
nc
rete
an
d p
erm
a-
ne
nt w
ate
r pro
ofin
g
Fig
ure
9 –
Co
ns
truc-
tion
Sta
ge
6 –
Co
n-
stru
ctio
n o
f raft fo
un
-
da
tion
Figure 10 - Finished Car Park with surrounding buildings
P A G E 2 3 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
SBAA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER – AKROTIRI – CYPRUS
The SBAA Environmental Center was completed on October 2014 and the structural designers were nomi-
nated for a Structural Award in 2015 by the Institution of Structural Engineers of UK.
The article is written by Yiannis Pericleous, MSc, MEng(Civil), MBA, Director of A. J. Pericleous LLC
The SBAA Environmental Center is located on a van-
tage point in Akrotiri area overlooking the salt lake
which is a significant wetland.
The Akrotiri peninsula is of international significance
and is characterized by the diversity in its flora and
fauna. The hydrology and archaeology, history and
culture of the area are unique. The salt lakes and
wetland system of Akrotiri and marshes were desig-
nated as a wetland of international importance under
the RAMSAR Convention of 2006 and is a candidate
to be a special area of conservation as part of the
Natura 2000 network. The Akrotiri peninsula hosts
more than 30 different orchid species and the flora of
the area includes more than 800 plant species and 10
of these are included in the Red Data Book of endan-
gered species. The salt lake and the surrounding wet-
lands host the largest number of water birds in Cyprus
and during the winter the area is visited by about 20.000 flamingos. The Akrotiri peninsula is also of very high im-
portance for archeology because the earliest known settlement in Cyprus dating to 12.000BC was found there.
The project design was assigned to A. J. Pericleous LLC by CSP-Interserve JV, which is a long term services con-
tractor in the British Bases in Cyprus. The whole design team was from Cyprus and it was led by
A. J. Pericleous LLC (Structural and geotechnical design), the architect was Landart Design Group and Aspelo
Consulting Ltd was responsible for the Electrical, mechanical and energy efficiency design.
The vision of the design team was to provide a landmark structure that would not only stand out but also would
make people wondering what it is and consequently make them willing to visit the facility. Furthermore, the building
should be energy efficient with low carbon footprint by implementing environmentally sustainable architecture and
utilizing renewable energy sources.
The building occupies about 400m2 and it is a single storey structure with a mezzanine. The ground floor incorpo-
rates all main operations and activities of the environmental center, which are the exhibits hall with various interac-
tive exhibits such as dioramas of wetlands and of the marine environment and terrestrial eco systems, a fully
equipped state of the art biology laboratory, a projection room for 50 persons and a conference room with a library.
On the mezzanine there are storages and mechanical plant rooms. A large cantilever provides unobstructed view
to the wildlife in the wetlands and the visitors can observe the flora and fauna of the area, as well as the city of
Limassol. The yard around the building includes a botanical trail that highlights the flora on the different habitat
types on the area and a playground for school groups and families.
P A G E 2 4 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
The concept of the
structural design was
to combine steel and
concrete to create an
elegant structural
system that would be
emphasized by the
arches. The main
arches, about 30m
span, were construct-
ed using steel and
their ends were
founded on different
levels due to the natu-
ral slope of the plot.
In order to make the
structure as sleek and elegant as possible the arches were designed having simple pin connections at their base.
The arches form the external dome that house an internal steel structure that forms the various areas and the mez-
zanine.
The building was designed according to the requirements of the Eurocodes. Computer finite element models were
developed to simulate the performance of the building and design against strong earthquake and wind conditions,
supplemented by hand calculations for checks. The peak ground acceleration at the area is ag=0.25g and the basic
wind speed is Vb=30m/s.
Due to the fact that the building is formed by two structurally independent structures special consideration was
given in the dynamic analyses to match the lateral displacements of each structure so that the blockwork walls will
not collapse during strong earthquake excitations.
Due to close proximity of the structure to the sea, airborne salt and sand could attach to the flanges and the bolt of
the pinned connections of the arches posing a risk to the structural system of the building. The reason is that cor-
P A G E 2 5 E - J O U R N A L 1 1
rosion will bond together the plates and the pin, making the pinned connection developing moments. As such, the
designers developed a simple yet very effective method to avert the risk of chemical bonding between the flanges
and the pin due to the corrosion by utilizing teflon plates and grease.
The building was designed as Energy Class A according to the Cyprus regulations. Sustainable design to create
cooling in the building utilizing the natural air flow was used and the building was suitably oriented so that a large
part of the roof is directed towards the south to maximize the energy production from the about 100m2 of photovol-
taic panels that produce 10.1kW of electricity, which corresponds to 50% of the electricity demand of the building.
Solar panels are also used for the production of hot water.
Cyprus is a fairly arid country with prolonged periods without rain. Therefore, the building has its own small sew-
age treatment unit to recycle all grey water that is then used for toilets and for irrigation, reducing the water con-
sumption to the absolute minimum.
The Akrotiri Environmental Center was funded by the British Sovereign Bases and its primary purpose is to pro-
mote the unique environmental and cultural significance of Akrotiri peninsula through programs and exhibits. Over
the last years the Center is visited by about 10.000 persons per year, about 6.000 are school students and 4.000
are visitors and researchers. During the first few months of operation of the new building the comments received
by the visitors of the Center were very overwhelming and their number has increased. Finally, the Akrotiri village
has a new landmark location and the community is also benefitted by the increased number of visitors who have
now the opportunity to spend more hours in the area, the facility and the village.
Full mem