ofSubmitted by
India is a very large country with an EEZ of 2 million km2, a continental shelf of some 500 000 km2, and ranks as the world’s fourth-largest fish producer, after China, Peru and Japan. Marine capture fisheries contribute less than half of the national fish production (48.7 percent in 2000), the remainder coming from inland fisheries, inland aquaculture and brackishwater aquaculture. This situation changed with the development of technology/modernization; dried products gave way to canned and frozen items. The product shift also resulted in market shift. More sophisticated and affluent markets like Aquaculture has become the mainstay of seafood exports, accounting for 90 per cent of current shrimp exports. The aquaculture harvest in 2011 had been very good, including Japan, USA, Europe and Australia, became our important buyers.
The lack of an overarching and coherent policy for coastal and deep-sea capture fisheries contributes to the weak structure of the sector. The current legal framework is dated, production oriented, and fails to provide a clear mandate and a framework for responsible fisheries management.
A new legal framework is required to define the objectives of marine resource management for the national and state administrations. Employment, increased production, welfare of fishermen and increased export earnings are the main aims pursued by the Government in its recent five year plans.
Efforts aimed at fisheries focus on infrastructure enhancement (ports and post harvest facilities) and modernisation of the fleet implemented through direct investments and subsidy schemes. Much less effort is aimed at resource appraisal, management and conservation of the resources. No single Ministry is responsible for managing the fisheries sector.
To improve the percentage of marine products exports reach in future at least 5% of total exports.
To improve the exports value also rise the Indian economy To focus on exports while having good resource in marine products to utilize
To give more job opportunities in Marine industry.
To be create new legal framework is required to define the objectives of marine resource management for the national and state administrations. Efforts aimed at fisheries focus on infrastructure enhancement (ports and post harvest facilities) and modernisation of the fleet implemented through direct investments and subsidy schemes.
To be modernising with increased mechanisation, but traditional small-scale craft stall remain responsible for these large catches. The east coast sector is modernising at a slower pace. Offshore fishing, or deep sea fishing, is still very much under-utilized in India.
To find the overall performance of MPEDA in international trade.
To analysis product wise export of MPEDA in international trade.
To Identify country wise export of MPEDA in international trade.
To find the export performance in forthcoming years using Trend analysis.
To implement the other strategies, requirements, suggestions for marine products exporters make it a success.
1. The finding of the study is applicable only to Marine products of over all india’s international trade.
2. Data has restricted only to MPEDA
3. It is restricted to 10years only.
4. Data collected will show only the approximate value not accurate value.
In this project using only Secondary Data. It is an integral part of any research study as it provides information on variables, which plays a major part in the actual research. The source of secondary data includes.Various books, journals, magazines, newspapers & Pamlets. Internet ( Email, Commerce websites)
The sampling size is estimated to be 10 years. (8 major items & 16 major exporting countries)
The period of the study is 3 months
The study has been carried out in MPEDA’s export performance in india’s marine exports.
The Marine Products Export Development Authority Acts as a coordinating agency with different Central and State Government establishments engaged in marine products and allied activities. The role envisaged for the MPEDA under the statute is comprehensive - covering fisheries of all kinds, increasing exports, specifying standards, processing, marketing, extension and training in various aspects of the industry. The Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA) was constituted in 1972 under the Marine Products Export Development Authority Act
Conservation and management of fishery resources and development of offshore fishing.
Registration of exporters and processing plants. Regulations of marine products export. Laying down standards and specifications. Acting as an agency for extension of relief as
per directions from Government. Helping the industry in relation to market
intelligence, export promotion, and import of essential items.
Imparting training in different aspects of the marine products industry, with special reference to quality control, processing and marketing.
Promotion of commercial shrimp farming. Promotion of joint ventures in aquaculture,
production, processing and marketing of value added seafood.
20046% 2005
7%20067%
20078%
20087%
20097%
201010%
201112%
201217%
201319%
% of exports /10years exports
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%2.08%
1.72%1.54% 1.40%
1.06%0.84%
1.17% 1.04% 1.13% 1.15%
% OF MARINE EXPORTS/TOTAL COMMODITY
0.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
8,000.00
10,000.00
12,000.00
14,000.00
16,000.00
18,000.00
20,000.006,
105.
63
6,46
9.22
7,03
5.91
8,00
1.04
6,92
6.67
7,06
6.37
9,89
9.98
11,9
17.1
1
16,5
84.7
1
18,8
41.2
0
MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORTS –(2004-2013) Rs in crores
2014 2015 2016 2017 20180.00
5000.00
10000.00
15000.00
20000.00
25000.00
30000.00
1707
3.82
1894
1.66
2092
2.38
2301
5.01 25
276.
30
FUTURE MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORTS
(value in crores)
COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE - (2004-2013)
MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORTS 11.93%
INDIA’S TOTAL EXPORTs 10.19%
20048%
20058%
20068%
20079%
20088%
20097%2010
8%
201111%
201216%
201318%
FROZEN SHRIMP
20043%
20054%
20066%
20078%
20087%
200910%
201011%
201115%
201218%
201318%
FROZEN FISH
20045%
20056%
20066%
20079%
20089%
20099%
201011%
201113%
201216%
201316%
FROZEN CUTTLE FISH
20045% 2005
7%
20068%
20078%
20086%
20099%
20109%
201114%
201217%
201319%
FROZEN SQUID
20043%
20053% 2006
4%
20076% 2008
6%
200910%
201013%
201112%
201217%
201326%
CHILLED ITEMS
20044% 2005
5%20066%
20078%
20089%
200911%
201010%
201112%
201217%
201318%
OTHERS
20045%
20055%
20066%
20076%
20087%
200910%
201014%
201114%
201215%
201319%
LIVE ITEMS
20043%
20053%
20063% 2007
4%20086%
20099%
201021%2011
21%
201212%
201318%
DRIED ITEM
20048%
20058%
20068%
20079%
20088%
20099%
20109%
201112%
201215%
201314%
JAPAN
20049%
20059%
20069%
20077%
20086%2009
6%
20106%
201111%
201216%
201322%
USA
20046% 2005
6%20067%
200710%
20088%
200911%2010
15%
201116%
201210%
201312%
CHINA
200411%
20057%
20066%
20075%
20087%
20098%
201011%
201110%
201216%
201318%
UMITED ARAB EMIRATES
20047%
20056%
20067%
20076%
20088%
20097%
201014%
201112%
201217%
201319%
SINGAPORE
20043%
20053% 2006
3% 20074%
20085%
20096%
201024%
201119%
201215%
201317%
HONG KONG
20048%
20057%
20069%
20078%
200810%
200910%
201011%
201110%
201213%
201314%
U K
20045%
20055%
20066%
20077%
20088%
200911%
201013%
201112%
201215%
201317%
GERMANY
20042%
20052%
20067%
20079%
200810%
200912%
20108%
201112%
201216%
201321%
BELGIUM
20044% 2005
5%20066%
20078%
20089%
200911%
201010%
201112%
201217%
201318%
ITALY
200411.4%
20059.0%
20061.3%20070.4%20081.6%20090.3%
201016.5%
201111.3%
201214.8%
201333.3%
BANGLADESH
20046%
200510%
2006
3%2007
4%2008
3%2009
3%201020%2011
15%
201217%
201319%
NETHERLAND
20045% 2005
6%
2006
5%2007
5%
20087%
20098%
201021%
201113%
201215%
201316%
SRI LANKA
20040.13%
20050.35%
20060.93%
20070.56%
20080.28%
20090.16%
20108.06%
201119.49%
201226.04%
201343.99%
SAUDI ARABIA
20043% 2005
5% 20063%
20071%
20089% 2009
1%
20106%
201116%
201225%
201330%
INDONESIA
20043%
20056%
20069%
20077%
200811%
20097%
201013%
201116%
201214%
201314%
KOREA
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
5.17
%
1.20
%
5.49
%
-12.
53%
-4.1
1% 10.6
5%
36.7
2%
42.9
7%
18.7
3%
FROZEN SHRIMP
0.00
%
22.3
2%
31.5
4%
45.4
8%
-10
.29% 32
.14%
18.0
0%
29.1
1%
25.1
6%
0.39
%
FROZEN FISH
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
8.93
% 15.8
5%
45.2
0%
-6.6
8%
2.27
%
21.3
9%
19.5
6%
21.9
2%
0.56
%FROZEN CUTTLE FISH
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
27.9
8%
20.5
9%
-1.2
5%
-28.
14% 54
.83%
-1.5
4%
62.3
1% 21.5
3%
12.2
0%
FROZEN SQUID
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-16.
93%
9.54
% 38.1
7%
41.3
4%
62.5
3% 133.
18%
-2.6
7%
-41.
08%
45.7
2%
DRIED ITEM
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-0.6
9%
21.6
1%
3.80
%
7.83
%
43.3
3%
40.5
5%
2.16
%
8.76
% 28.0
0%
LIVE ITEMS
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
6.41
%
19.7
0% 43.8
2%
0.68
%
84.0
2%
21.6
9%
-2.6
3%
38.7
8%
50.2
7%
CHILLED ITEMS
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
22.18% 20.82%17.36%
15.27% 25.48%
-7.45%
20.72%
36.58%
5.21%
OTHERS
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
3.33
%
-3.8
7%
17.0
8%
-9.2
9% 0.52
% 4.50
%
30.5
4% 27.1
6%
-6.5
9%
JAPAN
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-7.4
9%
5.34
%
-17.
78%
-24.
55%
0.45
% -0.8
8% 96.5
7%
49.6
0%
35.2
3%
USA
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2.48
% 22.5
3% 36.2
0%
-12
.74%
28.4
1%
38.1
4%
10.4
4%
-36
.33%
14.7
4%
CHINA
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-36.
40%
-18.
93% -7
.22% 36
.16%
16.3
9% 33.4
2%
-7.0
4%
56.3
0%
15.0
0%
UMITED ARAB EMIRATES
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-7.0
9% 4.84
%
-13.
24%
33.0
2%
-14.
00%
110.
45%
-16.
27%
44.4
6%
11.5
7%
SINGAPORE
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-16.
27%
19.4
5%
13.9
0%
22.4
5%
20.0
7%
311.
57%
-19.
83%
-22.
06%
11.9
4%
HONG KONG
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-6.8
1%
26.9
6%
-10.
08%
23.4
4%
-4.2
7%
10.3
2%
-6.8
8% 32.5
1%
4.93
%
UK
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
1.47
%
32.1
9%
12.6
6%
13.4
6%
35.4
2% 19.8
2%
-10.
54%
29.9
5%
12.3
3%
GERMANY
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-14.
73%
216.
07%
38.0
3%
13.8
5%
20.1
3%
-31.
65%
44.6
2%
27.8
5%
35.9
7%
BELGIUM
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
6.12
%
11.0
2%
-0.7
2%
7.05
%
26.7
2% 97.5
4%
-86.
85%
842.
00%
15.5
1%
ITALY
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-20
.51%
-85
.33% -
66.2
5%
249.
47% -
77.8
6%
4677
.55% -
31.9
2%
31.7
1%
124.
19%
BANGLADESH
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
63.7
6%
-65.
48%
18.5
1%
-29.
31%
15.7
1%
514.
21%
-26.
90%
19.0
7%
8.20
%
NETHERLAND
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
24.4
6%
-12
.63% -
13.1
6% 46.2
1%
19.5
0%
163.
85%
-36
.55%
15.6
3%
4.83
%
SRI LANKA
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
177.
36%
163.
95%
-39.
95%
-50.
64%
-40.
87%
4830
.88
%
141.
63%
33.6
5%
68.9
1%
SAUDI ARABIA
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
54.3
0%
-33.
41%
-79.
88%
1173
.82
%
-83.
56% 31
7.01
%
171.
79%
57.7
8%
18.4
4%
INDONESIA
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
77.4
4%
51.9
6%
-17.
65%
54.9
0%
-33.
37%
72.4
7%
20.8
1%
-8.6
5%
-2.9
6%
KOREA
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
4000.00
620.
7
759.
3
998.
7
1,45
2.9
1,30
3.4
1,72
2.3
2,03
2.3
2,62
3.9
3,28
4.1
3,29
6.9
3,54
4.2
3,92
1.1
4,29
0.8
4,66
1.5
5,08
2.1FROZEN FISH
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
1000.00
2000.00
435.
2
474.
0
549.
1
797.
4
744.
1
761.
0
923.
8
1,10
4.6
1,34
6.7
1,35
4.3
1,43
4.2
1,55
7.9
1,67
4.8
1,78
6.3
1,93
3.5FROZEN CUTTLE FISH
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
1000.00
2000.00
372.
9
477.
3
575.
5
568.
3
408.
4
632.
3
622.
6
1,01
0.6
1,22
8.2
1,37
8.1
1,28
9.6
1,41
9.9
1,56
9.1
1,74
1.3
1,91
4.2FROZEN SQUID
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
51.1
50.7
61.7
64.1
69.1 99.0 13
9.1
142.
2
154.
6
197.
9
193.
1
215.
4
237.
0
259.
1
279.
1LIVE ITEMS
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00500.00
1000.001500.00
145.
7
121.
0
132.
6
183.
2
258.
9
420.
7 981.
1
954.
9
562.
6
819.
9
985.
6
1,11
3.4
1,22
9.6
1,32
9.3
1,40
9.1DRIED ITEM
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
400.00
800.00
64.0
68.1
81.6
117.
3
118.
1
217.
3
264.
5
257.
5
357.
4
537.
1
465.
1
529.
3
593.
6
656.
5
719.
8CHILLED ITEMS
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180.00
500.001000.001500.002000.002500.00
389.
2
475.
6
574.
6
674.
3
777.
3
975.
3
902.
6
1,08
9.7
1,48
8.2
1,56
5.8
1,59
5.8
1,74
3.7
1,89
3.4
2,04
4.9
2,19
5.6OTHERS
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
5000.00
10000.00
15000.00
4,01
3.1
4,22
0.7
4,27
1.5
4,50
6.1
3,94
1.6
3,77
9.8
4,18
2.4
5,71
8.1
8,17
5.3
9,70
6.4
8,08
5.5
8,88
8.9
9,79
7.5
10,7
71.9
11,8
30.2FROZEN SHRIMP
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
2000.00
4000.00
1,68
2.1
1,55
6.1
1,63
9.2
1,34
7.8
1,01
6.9
1,02
1.6
1,01
2.5
1,99
0.3
2,97
7.5
4,02
6.5
2,88
7.2
3,27
2.6
3,69
8.2
4,20
1.8
4,69
1.8USA
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
1000.00
2000.00
676.
5
693.
3
849.
4
1,15
7.0
1,00
9.6
1,29
6.4
1,79
0.9
1,97
7.8
1,25
9.2
1,44
4.9
1,83
9.1
1,94
4.8
2,01
9.7
2,08
2.9
2,17
5.2CHINA
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0200400600800
325.
1
206.
8
167.
6
155.
5
211.
8
246.
5
328.
9
305.
7
477.
8
549.
5
469.
6
545.
8
611.
2
669.
9
719.
1UMITED ARAB EMIRATES
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
100
200
300
400
93.2
86.6
90.8
78.8 104.
8
90.1
189.
7
158.
8
229.
5
256.
0
241.
9
271.
7
301.
7
332.
4
358.
2SINGAPORE
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
500
1000
1500
109.
5
91.7
109.
6
124.
8
152.
8
183.
5 755.
1
605.
3
471.
8
528.
1
674.
1
764.
2
847.
9
925.
0
987.
7
HONG KONG
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
200400600800
278.
3
259.
4
329.
3
296.
1
365.
6
350.
0
386.
1
359.
5
476.
3
499.
8
490.
6
521.
0
544.
4
578.
4
602.
8U K
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0
100
200
300
53.9
54.7
72.3
81.4
92.4 12
5.1
149.
9
134.
1
174.
3
195.
8
202.
1
221.
7
239.
5
258.
0
275.
1GERMANY
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00
1000.00
2000.00
3000.00
1,16
3.7
1,20
2.5
1,15
6.0
1,35
3.4
1,22
7.6
1,23
4.0
1,28
9.6
1,68
3.4
2,14
0.7
1,99
9.6
1,99
6.5
2,14
2.0
2,30
0.6
2,44
7.6
2,62
9.7JAPAN
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
500
1000
1500
89.3
76.1 24
0.5
332.
0
378.
0
454.
1
310.
4
448.
9
573.
9
780.
3
726.
9
795.
9
846.
5
913.
1
990.
5BELGIUM
0200400600800
134.
2
142.
4
158.
1
156.
9
168.
0
212.
9 420.
6
55.3
521.
0
601.
8
496.
5
559.
4
625.
6
694.
7
759.
8ITALY
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0100200
48.3
38.4
5.6
1.9
6.6
1.5 70
.2
47.8
63.0 14
1.2
89.7
110.
2
133.
5
152.
5
169.
7BANGLADESH
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
200
400
80.8 13
2.3
45.7
54.1
38.3
44.3
271.
9
198.
7
236.
6
256.
0
260.
3
295.
3
346.
2
383.
5
417.
8NETHERLAND
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
50
100
17.1
21.2
18.5
16.1
23.5
28.1
74.2
47.1
54.5
57.1 66.2
73.4
81.4
88.3
93.1SRI LANKA
2004200520062007 200820092010201120122013 201420152016201720180
50100150200250300
0.5
1.5
3.9
2.3
1.1
0.7 33
.5 81.0 10
8.3 18
2.9
137.
2
164.
5
193.
8
224.
7
254.
8SAUDI ARABIA
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
50100150200
11.3
17.4
11.6
2.3 29
.7
4.9 20
.4 55.3 87
.3 103.
4
86.5
101.
3
118.
5
135.
5
149.
7
INDONESIA
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180
50100150200
27.2 48
.2 73.3
60.3 93
.5
62.3 10
7.4
129.
8
118.
5
115.
0
139.
4
146.
7
155.
1
166.
9
174.
5
KOREA
FROZEN SHRIMP
FROZEN FISH FR CUTTLE FISH
FR SQUID DRIED ITEM LIVE ITEMS CHILLED ITEMS
OTHERS0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
9.23
% 18.1
7%
12.0
2%
13.9
6%
18.8
6%
14.5
0%
23.7
0%
14.9
3%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
5.56
%
9.12
%
7.88
%
5.39
%
10.6
3%
17.0
3%
6.03
% 13.7
7% 24.2
1%
16.1
9%
11.3
3%
12.2
3%
12.8
4%
79.3
9%
24.8
1%
15.5
2%
•India’s highest export performance increased to18841.20crores ( 19.06%) in 2013 on Total marine exports.
•Indian overall products and Marine products exported from our country. In the year 2004 Total exports of marine
products contri buted arround 2.08% on India’s Total export. but it was decreased to 0.84% in 2009 on Total
exports. but it over all reveals the contri but ion was above 1% on all the year of marine products
•In the year 2010 contribution of Marine products is arround 40.10% and in the year 2008 it was increased to -
13.43% due to lack of demands in foreign country. Overall it shows function in marine products
•Marine products export to FROZEN SHRIMP at the value was increasing into highest level 9706.36 croress (18.48%) in the year of 2013.
•Marine products export of FROZEN FISH at the was increasing into highest level 3296.86croress (18.22%). in the year of 2013
•Marine products export of FROZEN CUTTLE FISH at thewas Growing the highest export value in the year of 2013 is 1354.28croress (15.95%).
•Marine products export of FROZEN SQUID at thewas increasing into highest leve 1378.08 croress (18.94%) . in the year of 2013
•Marine products export of DRIED ITEM at thewas increasing into highest level 819.90 croress (17.90%). in the year of 2013
•Marine products export to LIVE ITEMS at thewas increasing into highest level 197.89 croress (19.22%). in the year of 2013.
•Marine products export of CHILLED ITEMS at the value was increasing into highest level 537.11 crores(25.78%). in the year of 2013
•Marine products export of OTHERS at the value was increasing into highest level 1565.78croress (17.57%). in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to JAPAN at the value was increasing into highest level 2140.67croress(14.81%). in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to USA was increasing into highest level 4026.48croress(22.04%). in the year of 2013
•Marine products export to CHINA was increasing into highest level 1977.81croress(16.27%). in the year of 2011
•Marine products export to U ARAB EMTS at the value was increasing into highest level 549.51croress (18.47%). in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to SINGAPORE at the value was increasing into highest level 256.01croress (18.57%). in the year of 2013
•Marine products export to U K at the value was increasing into highest level 499.8croress (13.88%). in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to GERMANY at the value was increasing into highest level 195.75croress (17.27%). in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to BELGIUM at the value was increasing into highest level 780croress (21.18%) in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to ITALY at the value was increasing into highest level 601croress. (23.41%) in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to BANGLADESH at the value was increasing into highest level (33.26%) 3779.80croress. in the year of 2013
•Marine products export to NETHERLAND at the value was increasing into highest level (18.85%) 256.03croress. in the year of 2009
•Marine products export to SRI LANKA at the value was increasing into highest level (15.97%) 57.08croress. in the year of 2013
•Marine products export to SAUDI ARAB at the value was increasing into highest level (43.99%) 182.9croress. in the year of 2013.
•Marine products export to INDONESIA at the was increasing into highest level (30.10%) 03.36croress. in the year of 2013
•Marine products export to KOREA at the value was increasing into highest level 118.53croress (13.77). in the year of 2013.
•Marine products export to HONG KONG at the value was increasing into highest level 755.06croress (24.11%). in the year of 2010
The marine board should take
necessary steps to improve its
foreign trade .Because the future
trend of the board’s export is in
partially decreasing trend.
The board has to produce some
more variety of marine products.
The board should adopt some
safety measures to avoid future
losses.
Multiple usages & multiple-
ownership;
Poor understanding of
requirements of users;
The government and the industry
has to clearly identify the problem
and evolve a common strategy
involving the government and the
industry with cluster as focus.
Unlike marine sector, inland
fisheries cannot claim a satisfactory
status with regard to data collection;
Preparation of policy papers and
issuing guidelines based on latest
information on zonal and regional
basis
Poor understanding of
requirements of users; Lack of
relevant and usable information;
It is good to give more incentives
to the employees; it will be helpful
for increasing the production
marine product.
To avoid fluction in growth rate
for seasonal,demand,production,
market condition, tax rate
problem ,preshipment problem
should be avoided by improving
storage facility
Establishment and adoption of
standardized or compatible data
compilation methodologies and
tools;
The marine products export fetches several crores of foreign country to our country and provides
employment opportunities to our people. The production of the marine products must be increased to
increase the exports into global level. So, our marine products can hike their share into global level in
future. By, improving the exports of the marine products, it will yield the benefit to improve our
economy. Based on the above study we can find that all the aspects related to this company’s products
show a positive growth steadily. If marine export promotion council follows the strategy and policy
suitable to its environment it can be able to secure a significant portion of the world market. The
growth of exporter lies in the technical advancements, and maintenance of good will to beat the
competitions, which is extruding now as well as in the future. This chapter explains the trend analysis
for export statistics from the year 2014-2018. This projected trend will help the further enhancement of
the company. Increasing and declining trend has been shown by different charts.