Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2)
21st March 2017
Contents
1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1
2. Definitions ........................................................................................................................... 2
3. Background ......................................................................................................................... 3
4. Project Development ........................................................................................................... 5
5. Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 12
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015
1. Executive Summary
Purpose of the report The purpose of this report is to summarise the development of the Felixstowe Branch Line Capacity Enhancement Project to the point of single option selection. It will explain how a single option was selected as the most appropriate option to advance.
Current state of project development The Felixstowe Branch Line project is in the GRIP 4 stage of development, due to complete in May 2017.
Summary The Felixstowe Branch Line Capacity Enhancement Project is in development in order to increase the capacity of the Felixstowe Branch Line to up to 47* freight trains per day. The project fits into Network Rail’s aspirations to increase the number of trains that can operate between Felixstowe and the North.
The project has undertaken some distinct phases of development which has led to the chosen option:
1. Pre GRIP- constraints and capacity analysis was undertaken to identify ten options. 2. GRIP 2- Group strategy instructed the project to team to assess the feasibility of 3 of the
options identified in the pre-GRIP study. 1 option (option 2b) to meet CP5 capacity requirements and 2 options to meet CP6 capacity requirements. The feasibility study identified that although all were feasible, the 2 CP6 options did not meet the required capacity output and far exceeded the budget.
3. Option Selection (GRIP 3B) Design- Option 2b was designed to option selection level 4. Value engineering and capacity analysis 5. GRIP 3 (AiP)
*Note that the original objective from GRIP2 – GRIP3B was to achieve 48ftpd in CP5
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 1
2. Definitions AFC Anticipated Final Cost
AHB Automatic Half Barrier
ARC Anglia Route Collaboration
CP5 Control Period 5
F2N Felixstowe to Nuneaton
FEL Felixstowe Branch Line
ftpd Freight Trains Per Day
GRIP Guidance for railway infrastructure projects
HPUK Hutchinson Port UK
MCB-CCTV Manually Controlled Barrier- Closed circuit television
MCB-OD Manually Controlled Barrier- Obstacle Detection
UWC User worked crossing
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 2
3. Background The Felixstowe branch line is between Westerfield Junction and the Port of Felixstowe and is currently a single track with two passing loops. The geographical location of the branch line is shown in figure 1.
The existing branch line is a single non-electrified track between Westerfield Junction and the Port of Felixstowe. There are two passing loops along the route at Derby Road station and through Trimley station connecting with the North Terminal Feed. It is bi-directionally signalled from
Figure 1. The Felixstowe Branch Line
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 3
Colchester control panel. There are a number of crossings along the route including, 4 AHB Level Crossings, 2 MCB CCTV Level Crossings, 3 UWC crossings and 7 Footpath Crossings.
Whilst increasing the freight traffic the project must maintain the existing passenger service along the branch line. An hourly train, in each direction, currently operates servicing the stations between Felixstowe Town and Ipswich. The line currently operates at 33 freight trains per day which is above the hypothetical capacity of the line; this can be seen in figure 3. Figure 3 highlights the how the Felixstowe Branch Line constrains increasing traffic across the rest of the Felixstowe to Nuneaton Route and shows the interdependencies of upgrades elsewhere along the route.
Some of the key constraints achieving up to 47ftpd through doubling the branch line are Spring Road Viaduct, Red House Farm Under Bridge, the Viaduct at Nacton Road, Bridge over A14, Network Rail land boundary, Level Crossings and the proximity of residential properties. Some of these constraints are shown in figure 3, the areas in green show the areas whereby double tracking should be easy to achieve.
Figure 3 Constraints on Felixstowe Branch Line
Figure 2. F2N Current Traffic and Capacity
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 4
4. Project Development
2005 Port Study In 2005 HPUK Ports, the operator of the Port of Felixstowe, completed a GRIP 4 study looking to double the Felixstowe Branch Line between Orwell and Trimley for 4 ½ miles. Throughout this the development of this scheme Network Rail acted in an Asset Protection capacity. The scheme was paused in 2007 when the Port discontinued their Port enhancement plans. The scope of the works developed in 2005 is different to the study currently being undertaken by Network Rail as they were developing a solution to reach a capacity of 40ftpd in each direction and it was designed for train lengths of 500m rather than the 775m. Although this scheme was different in scope there are some similarities and the 2005 works have been used through the development of the current scheme. Most importantly, the later Network Rail scheme has been developed under the assumption that HPUK’s Transport and Works Act Order (TWAO) can be transferred to Network Rail in order to facilitate the doubling project.
Pre GRIP Study Network Rail started to develop a solution to increase capacity along the Felixstowe branch line in 2012. Group Strategy developed a ‘pre GRIP study’ analysing the key constraints on the branch line and the capacity that various interventions would provide. Please see appendix A for the details of the report. The ten options the pre GRIP scheme developed are shown in table 1.
Option Description
0 No change to infrastructure
1 Partial doubling between Derby Road and Trimley
1a Option 1 + Westerfield Jn Doubling and passing loop
1b Option 1 + Extension of Derby Road Loop
1c Combination of 1a & 1b
2 Passing loop near Orwell
2a Passing loop near Orwell & Westerfield Jn and passing loop
3 Doubling of whole line as far as Felixstowe Beach Jn
3a Doubling of whole line as far as Felixstowe Junction except constrained sections
Table 1 Pre GRIP Option Description
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 5
The study also considered wider non infrastructure options including reinstating the disused platform at Trimley, altering the passenger service, changing the rolling stock, raising line speeds, seven day operation and reprioritisation of freight trains over passenger services.
All options were assessed based on freight capacity, performance flexibility, performance risk and approximate costs. The solutions were then ranked, indicating 1c to be the best solution followed by 1a, 1b and 2a. Further capacity analysis was undertaken on option 2a and the output of that analysis led the option to evolve into option 2b which would deliver the required output of 48ftpd.
GRIP 2 Study In October 2014 the project was passed from the Group Strategy into Network Rail Infrastructure Projects. The Anglia Route Collaboration (ARC) has developed the project through GRIP 2 and GRIP 3B. The GRIP 2 study was carried out between October 2014 and February 2015 with the aim of establishing the feasibility of three remitted options. The three options were chosen from the cost benefit analysis carried out in the pre GRIP study; these options are shown in table 2.
Option Description Required Output
2b Relocation of Westerfield station to facilitate double junction and 1000m passing loop at Westerfield Junction. 1250m loop at Orwell and Trimley
48 (2023 freight forecast)
1a Double junction and 1000m passing loop at Westerfield Junction. 6800m extension to North Terminal Feed.
60 (2033 freight forecast)
1c Double junction and 1000m passing loop at Westerfield Junction. 1600m extension to Derby Road loop & 6800m extension to North Terminal Feed.
60 (2033 freight forecast)
Table 2 GRIP 2 Option Description
Grip 2 involved the assessment of existing asset surveys, site walkouts, assessing the constructability of each option with discipline specialists and provision of an AFC budget estimate for each option. Table 3 shows the AFC figures produced at GRIP 2.
During GRIP 2 an error in the freight forecasts was identified and as a result the required output for options 1a and 1c was increased to 65ftpd to meet 2033 freight demand. As a result of this change the project employed the services of the capacity analysis team to confirm whether the options would still be able to output the required amount. Prior to the capacity analysis being undertaken, the project team were advised that the options were unlikely to achieve the required output without a crossover to the eastern side of Trimley
Option Cost
2b £106.2m
1a £120.3m
1c £135.9m
Table 3 GRIP 2 Option AFC
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 6
Station. This was then included into the scope for both options 1a and 1c. It was identified that the modelling undertaken on option 2b in the pre GRIP study demonstrated that the Trimley loop needed to be 1.6km to achieve 48ftpd longer, as a result the project adopted the new layouts. These are shown in appendix C. The output from the capacity analysis was not completed until GRIP 3B.
Early track design identified that Westerfield Station did not necessarily have to be relocated to facilitate the double junction at Westerfield Junction. Seven options were developed and presented at a meeting on 19th December 2014, the minutes from this meeting can be found in appendix A. A switch diamond solution was chosen because it maintained existing line speeds and allowed the station to remain in situ. It was noticed that the whole life cost and maintainability of the layout is not preferred but the extensive costs associated with a new station and continued maintenance was deemed sufficient to counter balance this argument. This decision was re-examined during GRIP 3B.
GRIP 2 culminated in a design review of the feasibility of all options, a construction review of the feasibility of all options and three GRIP 2 AFC estimates. The constructability review of option 1c highlighted some difficulties associated with the construction of the Derby Road extension. These involved significant earthworks, retaining structures, temporary works, tree preservation orders, proximity to a golf course and an increase disturbance to residences with additional powers required to purchase adjacent property.
GRIP 3B- Option Selection
Option Description Required Output
2b Double junction and 1000m passing loop at Westerfield Junction. 1250m loop at Orwell and 1600m extension to
North Terminal Feed.
48 (2023 freight forecast)
1a Double junction and 1000m passing loop at Westerfield Junction. 6800m extension to North Terminal Feed & a
crossover east of Trimley station.
65 (2033 freight forecast)
1c Double junction and 1000m passing loop at Westerfield Junction. 1600m extension to Derby Road loop & 6800m extension to North Terminal Feed & a crossover east of
Trimley Station.
65 (2033 freight forecast)
Table 4 GRIP 3B Options Description
GRIP 3B commenced in March 2015 after the completion of GRIP 2. As a result of GRIP 2, the three options to be developed were defined as shown in table 4. During GRIP 3B the project carried out ground investigation, topographical surveys, asset assessment, capacity analysis, environmental assessment, design and level crossing risk assessments.
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 7
Early in GRIP 3B, capacity analysis indicated that neither options 1a nor option 1c met the requirement of 65 ftpd rather they only achieve 51 and 56 ftpd respectively. The development of options 1a and 1c were halted due to the difficulties in construction, the cost exceeding budget and the capacity increase not achieving the required output. As a result only option 2b was developed through GRIP 3B.
The design of Westerfield Junction was reviewed during GRIP 3B, due to the heavy freight traffic along the Felixstowe branch line and the whole life cost constraints associated with switch diamonds, the project agreed with the route that a fixed diamond could be installed instead. This solution would aid the ongoing maintenance of the junction and provide a longer lifecycle for the junction.
The project held an option selection workshop on 20th July 2015, the minutes from this meeting can be found in appendix A. The meeting was held to explain how the single option had been derived to agree that the option was the best option was to take forward and to confirm sub option decisions within the option. It was agreed in a meeting with the Felixstowe risk analysis team on 22nd June 2015 that a decision matrix was not required for the meeting as there was already sufficient justification for the single option selected.
Value engineering (Autumn 2015) During GRIP 3B it became apparent that the proposed options far exceeded the project’s available funding. Therefore the project started to look at the feasibility of alternative options for locations of a loop. This included new loop locations and the option to deliver parts of TWAO rather than the scheme in full.
These alternative options were assessed on an indicative price and indicative capacity output. None of the alternative options met the required capacity output of the time (desire 48 ftpd). Some of the options that were looked at are shown in table 5. These options were assessed by constructability, requirement for possessions, funding available, consents required and the capacity output and are shown in table 5.
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 8
Table 5 Alternative Options
*All prices were developed outside of the GRIP process based on no design and therefore are a high level indication of what the price could be. The capacity numbers are also a high level view, for more certainty detailed train modelling would need to be undertaken.
This initial review was used as a basis to select options to be reviewed further, in detail, by the capacity analysis team. The client accepted that 48ftpd would not be achievable within the budget available, therefore looked for options that delivered the greatest increase for within the budget. Further capacity analysis The project team produced some high level signalling designs and Network Rail capacity analysis team undertook detailed capacity analysis on the following options (see appendices for visualisations):
1. Current Infrastructure 2. Option 2a- Westerfield & Orwell Loop 3. Option 2- Orwell Loop 4. Option 2b1- Trimley Loop 1.6km 5. Option 1f1- Ransomes way loop 6. Option 1f2- Westerfield loop
Table no shows the anticipated output from each option
Infrastructure Potential Up paths Potential Down paths
Total potential paths
Current infrastructure 24 36 60 Option 2a 44 33.5 77.5 Option 2 44 33 77
Option
Loop cost (£m) Constructability Possession Funding Consents
Build towards 2b (option for
same AiP)
Output(TBC by Capability
Analysis)
Option 2b (Westerfield, Orwell & Trimley 1.6km)
106.148 ftpd
Westerfield & Orwell
73.7 36 ftpd
Orwell49.8
31 ftpd
Trimley 6.8 km101.9 36 ftpd
Trimley 1.6km60.7
31 ftpd
Ransomes Way30.0 31 ftpd
Westerfield 52.2 31 ftpd
Base case option - outputs confi rmed by timetable s tudy, subject to recommendations made on des ign, developed to GRIP 3B ready for AIP des ign. Planning required for Westerfield only.
Confi rmed by previous timetable s tudy; reduced by 1tph, in l ine with timetable s tudy for 2b, due to morning peak passenger service. Planning required for Westerfield only
No evidence to date for any measurable capaci ty benefi t. High level price view only, i f this option i s selected the TWAO would be lost
No evidence to date for any measurable capaci ty benefi t
No evidence that this figure or a higher figure could be achieved, subject to provis ion of crossover east of Trimley
No evidence to date for any measurable capaci ty benefi t
No evidence to date for any measurable capaci ty benefi t. Planning required for this loop. If we did this option we would lose TWAO
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 9
Option 2b1 45 47 93 Option 1f2 37 40 77
The modelling determined that all infrastructure between Derby Road and all Felixstowe terminals would need to be capable of bi-directional operation. Option 2b.1 evolved therefore to also include the installation of bi-di signalling at Derby Road and also a double junction at Westerfield to mitigate RAM concerns about the durability of this junction. Therefore it became option 4. The project team undertook a high level cost estimate that showed it was likely that the project could build this option for less than the budge of £68m.
AiP Design Phase Early on in the AiP design phase, the project team demonstrated to the sponsor and the RAM that the double junction at Westerfield would not alleviate the maintenance burden or increase the durability of the junction, as there would still be a single lead into the junction. Therefore it was agreed that the double junction at Westerfield would be removed from scope. The final scope of the project was agreed as option 5.
Further capacity analysis was undertaken on option 5 which indicated that up to 47 freight trains per day would be delivered by the scope of work.
Sub option selection Throughout the development of the project, option selection has taken place on many aspects of the job. In particular, different options were developed for the Bridleway Bridge and Public Rights of way layout. The options considered for the bridleway bridge were:
1. Underpass 2. Vehicular bridge 3. Steel bridge 4. Earth ramp bridge 5. Reinforced concrete bridge
A steel bridge was selected due to environmental, constructability and cost considerations. A link to the option selection report can be found in the appendices. The alterations to the Public Rights of Way network were developed through consultation with the local authority and public, as such the project worked up seven different options to determine how alterations could be implemented. The sub options and final option can be seen in the Non Technical Summary of the Environmental Statement.
Conclusions The final scope of the project to be taken to detailed design, known as option 5, is as follows:
• 1.4km of additional track to be installed at Trimley; • Closure of 6 pedestrian crossings; • Construction of a bridleway bridge; • Re-alignment of the existing public rights of way network; • Upgrade of 3 AHB level crossing to MCB-OD;
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 10
• Upgrade of 1 AHB level crossing to CCTV, and • Complete re-signalling of the branch line and associated rail system enhancements.
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 11
5. Appendices
Appendix A
Document Title GRIP Stage
Date Link
Change control: CR-ANG-PM-514
2 17/02/15 139989-NRS-CHN-MPM-000001
Change control: CR-ANG-PM-530
3B 20/03/15 139989-NRS-CHG-MPM-000001
Change control: CR-ANG-PM-556
3B 10/04/15 139989-NRS-CHG-MPM-000002
Change control: CR-ANG-PM-569
3B 30/04/15 139989-NRS-CHG-MPM-000003
Felixstowe Branch Capacity Increase
Feasibility Study Part 1
PRE 28/03/13 139989-NRS-REP-MAN-000002
Felixstowe Branch Capacity Increase
Feasibility Study Part 2
PRE 02/04/13 139989-NRS-AGR-MPM-000001
Felixstowe Branch Line Capability Report 0.2
3B 23/04/15 139989-NRS-REP-MPM-000009
Felixstowe Branch Line Preferred Option Capacity
Study
PRE 04/02/15 139989-NRS-REP-MAN-000003
GRIP 2 Estimate Work Scope
2 01/04/15 139989-VOF-REP-EMF-000001
GRIP 2 Pre-Feasibility Report
2 28/01/15 139989-ATK-REP-EMF-000001
GRIP 3B Option Selection Report
3B 14/07/15 139989-ATK-REP-EMF-000002
HAZID Record 2 19/01/15 139989-NRS-LOG-SSD-000001
Initial Capacity Analysis Finding
3B 30/03/15 139989-NRS-EML-MPM-000001
Minutes from Westerfield Junction Sub Options
2 19/12/15 139989-NRS-MIN-ETR-000001
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 12
Meeting
Project Requirement Specification
2/3b 01/08/14 139989-NRS-PDD-MPM-000001
Sponsors Instruction V1 2 30/04/14 139989-NRS-REP-MPM-000004
Sponsors Instruction V2 3B 21/05/15 139989-NRS-INS-MPM-000001
Further CP5 Options Report
3B/3C 17/12/15 https://www.ebsouthern.co.uk/Southern-Production/Search/QuickLink.aspx?n=139989-NRS-REP-MPM-500034%3a-+REPORT&t=3&d=Main%5cIP-Southern-Prod&sc=Global&r=01&i=view
AiP capacity analysis report
G3C October 16
https://www.ebsouthern.co.uk/Southern-Production/Framework/Object.aspx?o=263770&t=3
RRD G3C/4 March 16 139989-NRS-REP-EMG-500054
Sponsor’s Instruction G3C/4
G3C/4 March 16 139989-NRS-INS-MPM-500027
Bridleway bridge option selection report
G3C Sept 16 https://www.ebsouthern.co.uk/Southern-
Production/Framework/Object.aspx?o=236368&t=3
Technical note on Subway G3C/4 Feb 17 139989-ATK-NOT-EST-000001
Technical note on Vehicular Bridge
G3C/4 Dec 16 139989-ATK-NOT-EGE-000001
Environmental Statement – Non Technical Summary
G3C/4 March 17 139989-ATK-REP-EEN-000005
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 13
Appendix B
GRIP 2 Layouts
Option 2b
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 14
Option 1a
Option 1c
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 15
Appendix C
GRIP 3B Option Layouts
Option 2b
Option 1a
Option 1c
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 16
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 17
Appendix D- Other Options
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 18
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 19
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 20
Option 4
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 21
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 22
Option 5
Felixstowe Capacity Enhancement Option Selection Report (VM2) Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential
14 August 2015 Page 23
Network Rail Infrastructure Projects Southern Waterloo General Offices, Station Approach London SE1 8SW T +44(0)20 7902 3063 www.networkrail.co.uk This document is the property of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited. It shall not be reproduced in whole or part nor disclosed to a third party without the written permission of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited. Uncontrolled copy once printed from its electronic source. Published and Issued by Network Rail Infrastructure Limited, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9AG Copyright 2015 Network Rail Infrastructure Limited. All rights reserved.