7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
1/73
Femtocells: Technology andDevelopments
re ess n orma on eory ummer c oo ,Centre for Wireless Communications,
Oulu, 29.7.2011
Jyri Hmlinen, Comnet/Aalto University
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
2/73
Outline
Femtocell: Basics
3GPP Home (e)NodeB concept Service requirements for Home Node B (HNB) and Home
eNode B (HeNB)
HeNB and HNB systems: the logical architecture
Home eNode B (HeNB) Radio Frequency (RF)radio and interference scenarios, and measurements
Femtocell Networks: Some Research problems
Some reference material
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
3/73
Femtocell: Basics
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
4/73
Background
The recent explosive growth of the smartphone market has lead tomass deployment of data-intensive wireless services, e.g.,
webbrowsing, emailing, streaming of multimedia content. Mobile networks are about to reach their capacity limits in terms of
the number of supported end-users as well as in terms of the overalldata rates. (Thinking exercise: is this claim really true?)
Increasing the number of macrocell sites is costly and ineffectivesince around 50 % of voice calls and 70 % of data usage currentlytakes place indoors (*) where up to 20dB penetration loss(**)reduces the outdoor to indoor signal strength.
(**) Default indoor penetration loss in3GPP performance evaluation guidelines
(*) G. Mansfield, Femtocells in the US Market Business Drivers andConsumer Propositions, FemtoCells Europe, ATT, London, U.K., June2008. Femto Forum, www.femtoforum.org
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
5/73
Growth of data demand
Growth of transferred data in Western Europe (S. Liu et al: A 25 Gb/s(/km2) UrbanWireless Network Beyond IMT-Advanced, IEEE Comm. Magazine, Feb. 2011).
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
6/73
What is femto base station?
In general we can characterize femtocells as follows:
The Femto Base Station is an inexpensive compact base stationproviding equal radio access interface as a common macrocellularbase station (MBS) towards User Equipments (UEs).
The FBS devices are deployed autonomously by subscribers inresidential or enterprise premises in a manner of plug-and play.
The user traffic in FBS is backhauled to the mobile operator core
network over IP via the residential broadband wireline connection(DSL, optical network etc.)which is available locally in the site ofdeployment.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
7/73
Basic concept
The standardization process of femtocells launched in August
2007 via the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) is stillunder way. First products came to the market at 2008.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
8/73
Why femtocells?
For the mobile operator: Data offload from macrocell network
increased network capacitySlower growth in macrocell backhaul costs.
Expanded revenue opportunities (sometimes) Lower backhaul costs (less macrocell traffic)
For the user: Better indoor coverage, full speed data transfer at home and
ubiquitous mobility between home cell and overlaying macrocell. Lower terminal transmission power at home (who cares?)
Extended phone battery life (its short anyway) One phone number, phonebook & consolidated bill
(not so much of an issue in Finland)
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
9/73
Market pull
Interestingly, the driving force behind femtocell concept havebeen the operators.
Usually new technologies are pushed by industry that has clearincentive to sell more HW. (market pull rather than technologypush)
Actually femtocell concept was initially not attractive to main
Femtocells are low cost high volume products => businessconcept is different than in case of macrocell networks.
There was a threat that femtocells could cannibalize operatorsmain business (macrocellular systems).
Currently femto BS production has been outsourced for
subcontractors. Big players like NSN and Ericsson carry out the system
integration.
Yet, it is understood that femtocell concept can become an important tool for
mobile operators to keep customers satisfied and to limit the increasing networkcosts. Survival of mobile operators will be crucial also for manufacturers.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
10/73
3GPP Home (e)NodeB concept
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
11/73
Service requirements for Home Node B(HNB) and Home eNode B (HeNB)
Reference: 3GPP TS 22.220 V10.7.0 (2011-6)
H(e)NB = HNB and HeNB
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
12/73
Access Control requirements
Subject to operator and H(e)NB Hosting Party agreement, theoperator shall be able to configure the H(e)NB with open,
hybrid or closed access mode. When the H(e)NB is configured for open access mode, itshall be possible for the H(e)NB to provide services tosubscribers of any PLMN, subject to roaming agreement.
,shall be possible for the H(e)NB to provide services to: its associated CSG members, and subscribers of any PLMN not belonging to its associated CSG,
subject to roaming agreement.
When the H(e)NB is configured for closed access mode, onlyusers that belong to its associated CSG shall be able toobtain services.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
13/73
Closed Subscriber Group (CSG)
The CSG manager shall be able, under the operator supervision, toadd, remove and view CSG membership. NOTE: the interaction of
the user with the application that manages the Allowed CSG Lists isout of scope of 3GPP (e.g. Web interface).
For each subscriber, the network maintains a single CSG listcontaining the CSG identities that the subscriber is allowed to use.
e s a conta n a st o a owe ent t es oweList). It shall be possible to store the Allowed CSG List in the USIM.
Each CSG identity shall be associated to a subscriber groupwhichidentifies the subscribers allowed to access the CSG.
When the subscriber group is updated, the affected UE shall be
informed accordingly.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
14/73
Closed Subscriber Group (CSG)
For temporary members, it shall be possible to limit the period oftime during which the subscriber is considered a member of a CSG(granted access rights). It shall be possible to configure a timeperiod for each temporary member.
The time period shall be configurable by the CSG manager and/orthe operator operating the CSG. Unlimited membership to the CSGis allowed.
In hybrid access mode when services cannot be provided to a CSGmember due to a shortage of H(e)NB resources it shall be possibleto continue the established communication of non-CSG members inanother cell.
In hybrid access mode, to minimise the impact on CSG membersfrom established communication of non-CSG members, it shall bepossible for the network to allow the data rate of established PScommunication of non-CSG members to be reduced.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
15/73
CSG: source for critical interference?
Critical interferencebetween femtocells
may occur since HOis not necessarily
possible in CSG. 2
2b2a
1 1
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
16/73
HNB and HeNB Installation, identificationand location requirements H(e)NB shall have a unique equipment identity.
It shall be possible to support at least 125 million CSG Identities
within a PLMN of an operator.
The radio transmitter of a H(e)NB shall not be activated untilconfigured and authorised by the operator.
en ns a ng, prov s on ng, con gur ng or re-con gur ng anH(e)NB the operator shall be able to:
Verify the H(e)NB's identity.
Obtain the geographical location of the H(e)NB.(*)
(*) Macrocell level location can be easily found but accurate location is difficult
to reach. UE measurement reports can be used to detect adjacent (e)NBs.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
17/73
HNB and HeNB Installation, identificationand location requirements NOTE: The scenario where a H(e)NB is connected to one
operators network and later changed to another operators network
is not required (*). The operator shall be able to determine that the H(e)NB is installed
and operated in accordance with all relevant regulatoryre uirements.
The operator shall be able to configure the settings of the H(e)NB.In the case where the H(e)NB has detrimental impact on thespectrum usage, the H(e)NB can be set to out-of-service by theoperator. (**)
Installation and activation of a new H(e)NB shall require noreconfiguration of the operators network.
(*) Leads to operator specific H(e)NB products
(**) Deciding this will create technical challenge
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
18/73
OA&M Requirements
H(e)NB shall support the automatic discovery of an operatorsmanagement platform.
It shall be possible to make use of the operators managementplatform to carry out OA&M functions for H(e)NB. The managementconnection between H(e)NB and the operator's managementplatform shall be end-to-end secure.
e s a support & proce ures w c a ow t e operator to remotely configure the H(e)NB, deploy software upgrades, detectand report changes in RF conditions and perform general OA&Mtasks.(*)
If the connection between H(e)NB and the rest of the operator
network is out of service, then it shall be possible within anoperators defined time period for the H(e)NB to deactivate the air-interface.
(*) Remote configuration of HeNBs will be a great challenge
once mass deployment of femtocells has taken place
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
19/73
Services support
Subject to availability of network resources there shall be nodifference in the user experience when using the PLMN provided
services via H(e)NB or via NodeB/eNodeB (NB/eNB). Deployment of H(e)NBs and NB/eNBs on the same spectrum
should not degrade the performance of UEs receiving service fromNB/eNBs. *
Deployment of H(e)NBs and NB/eNBs on the same spectrumshould not degrade the NB/eNBs coverage and capacity. (*)
H(e)NB shall support emergency calls for both CSG and non CSGmembers.
It shall be possible for the operator to provide location information ofthe UE attempting an emergency call over a H(e)NB.
(*) These requirements set a technical challenge for
interworking between femto layer and macro layer
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
20/73
Local IP Access (LIPA)
Mobileoperators
corenetwork
UE
Local IP traffic
IP traffic to mobile operators CN
scope of Local IP access
logical connection for mobile operator IPtraffic
Residential/enterpriseIP Network
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
21/73
Local IP Access (LIPA)
Local IP Access provides access for IP capable UEs connected viaa H(e)NB (i.e. using H(e)NB radio access) to other IP capable
entities in the same residential/enterprise IP network. Data traffic for Local IP Access is expected to not traverse the
mobile operators network except mobile operator networkcom onents in the residential/enter rise remises.
Signaling traffic will continue to traverse the mobile operatornetwork
This maybe doesnt seem too exotic: it just states that user datacan go directly to e.g. Public Internet. Yet, this is revolutionand
may in long term imply that role of core networks is reduced.What this means for billing: operator cant necessarily any morecalculate volume of user data => flat rate or time based billing.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
22/73
Some other requirements
The H(e)NB may support remote access for a CSG member to thehome based network from a UE via a PLMN in order to provideaccess to IP capable devices connected to the home based network(*).
It shall be possible to restrict the access to the home based networkon per-subscriber basis(e.g. some subscribers may have managedaccess to their home network and others may not) (**)
It shall be possible to support Television services(over e.g. MBMS).
It shall be possible for the network to set different criteria for accesscontrol in a hybrid cell for CSG and non-CSG members.
The H(e)NB shall provide a high level of security, equivalent orbetter than Rel-8 3GPP systems.
Security policy shall be under the control of the H(e)NB networkoperator
(*) You can use some devices at home remotely.
(**) Your wife may use all devices at home remotely.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
23/73
Some use cases
H(e)NB Guest Users
User A and User B are subscribers of Operator 1 and Operator 2
respectively. User A visits User B in his home and User B allowsUser A to use H(e)NB in User Bs home. User A should be able toaccess all the services he is subscribed to from Operator 1 basedon the policies set by User B and operator 2. Operator 1 andOperator 2 have roaming agreement.
HNB/HeNB NB/eNB Handovers
User A subcribes to cellular services of Operator 1 and is authorisedto access a HNB/HeNB from same or other operator. User A startsservice in the H(e)NB coverage and continues moving into a cellular
network. Similarly User A starts service in cellular network andcontinues moving into H(e)NB coverage. User A does not see anyimpact on services due to mobility in both cases.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
24/73
Some use cases
Hybrid access mode
In order to improve the coverage in a shopping mall, H(e)NBs aredeployed. The shopping mall owner may have been provided aspecial deal by the network operator where the employees of theshopping mall will get preferential charging rates and priority accesswhen accessing services via these H(e)NBs. In exchange, theshopping mall owner allows the public to use the H(e)NBs to accessthe normal network operator services. The H(e)NB Hosting Party
not need to do anything special in order to get services on theH(e)NB.
Open access mode
Typically to enhance coverage or capacity of an operators publicnetwork, for example in railway stations, airports, stadiums, etc,taking benefit of the H(e)NBs additional functionality (e.g.uncoordinated deployment).
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
25/73
HeNB and HNB systems: the logicalarchitecture
References:3GPP TR 23.830 V9.0.0 (2009-09; partly outdated)3GPP TS 25.467 V10.0.0 (2010-12; focus on UTRAN)
H(e)NB = HNB and HeNB
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
26/73
LTE Rel.8 architecture
EPC = Evolved Packet Core
MME = Mobility Management EntityP-GW, S-GW = Packet data network and Serving GateWay
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
27/73
LTE Home eNB architecture
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
28/73
LTE Home eNB architecture
The HeNB Gateway concentrate a large number of HeNBsand appears as an MME to the HeNB and the EPC.
Amongst others it provides the Tracking Area Code (TAC)and network identification (PLMN ID) to the HeNB
The Security Gateway is a mandatory logical function. It may
integrated into the HeNB-GW. The SeGW secures thecommunication from/to the HNB.
HeNB architecture development is ongoing, furtherinformation can be found from 3GPP Feature and Study
Items list, see http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/FeatureListFrameSet.htm
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
29/73
WCDMA/HSPA Architecture (until Rel.6)
RNC = Radio Network ControllerMCS/VLR = Mobile services switching centre/visitor location registerHLR = Home Location Register
SGSN/GGSN = Serving/Gateway GPRS Support NodeGMSC = Gateway MCS
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
30/73
3G Home NB architecture
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
31/73
3G Home NB architecture
The HNB-GW appears to the CN as an RNC and serves as aconcentrator of HNB connections.
The Iu interface between the CN and the HNB-GW serves the samepurpose as the interface between the CN and a RNC.
The Local Gateway (L-GW) may be present only when the HNBoperates in LIPA mode. When present, it is co-located with the HNB, inwhich case the HNB has a Gn/S5 interface towards the SGSN/SGW.
Iuh is the interface between the HNB and HNB GW. For the control
plane, Iuh support HNB registration, UE registration and error handlingfunctions. For the user plane, Iuh support user plane transport bearerhandling
The Iurh interface between HNBs admit two options: Direct interface connectivity between HNBs
HNB-GW serves as a proxy between HNBs Gi is the interface towards the residential/IP network (in LIPA mode)
SGW = Serving GateWay
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
32/73
3G Home NB architecture
The HNB management system (HMS): facilitates HNB-GW discovery.
provides configuration data to the HNB. performs location verification of HNB and assigns appropriateserving elements (HMS, Security Gateway and HNB-GW).
Security Gateway (SeGW): ,
certain deployment options. authentication of HNB. provides the HNB with access to the HMS and HNB-GW.
HNB Gateway (HNB-GW): terminates Iuh from HNB and appears as an RNC to the Core
network. supports HNB registration and UE registration over Iuh.
Details of functional split between HNB, HNB-GW and CN
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
33/73
3G Home NB architecture
From 3GPP TS 25.467 one finds: Details of functional split between HNB, HNB-GW and CN.
UTRAN functions for HNB access (UE Registration, HNBRegistration, HNB-GW Discovery Function, HNB mobility issues,HNB Configuration Transfer, etc)
Interestingly, in 3GPP TS 25.467 just three interferencemiti ation scenarios has been mentioned:
In UL: Adaptively limiting the HNB UEs maximum UL Tx Power inconnected mode possibly using HNB UE measurement andcalculating the path loss between HNB UE and Macro NB.
In DL: (a) Redirecting unauthorized UE to another carrier possiblybased on uplink access attempts by unauthorised UE. (b) AdjustingHNBs DL CPICH Tx Power adaptively either temporarily or over
long term possibly based on uplink access attempts byunauthorised UE.
CPICH = Common Pilot CHannel
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
34/73
Home eNode B (HeNB) Radio Frequency (RF)radio and interference scenarios,and measurements
References:3GPP TR 36.921 V10.0.0 (2011-04)3GPP TR 36.922 V10.0.0 (2011-04)3GPP TS 36.104 V10.3.0 (2011-06)3GPP TR 25.967 V10.0.0 (2011-04, omitted here)
H(e)NB = HNB and HeNB
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
35/73
Radio Scenarios: Deployment
configurations Main deployment configurations for Home NodeB:
Open access or CSG (Closed Subscriber Group)
Dedicated channel or co-channel
Fixed or adaptive (DL) maximum transmit power
Also fixed or ada tive resource artitionin form a
deployment configuration. Specifically, the resource partitioning could be performed in
frequency, time or spatial dimensions for interferencecoordination.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
36/73
Radio Scenarios: Resource partitioning
Frequency partitioning
First example: softfrequency reuse.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
37/73
Radio Scenarios: Resource partitioning
Frequency band for the network
Reuse onepartition
Orthogonal
Frequency partitioning Second example: partly or fully orthogonal partitioning
par on
Partially overlap
partition
Frequency allocated to macrocell
Frequency allocated to femtocell
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
38/73
Radio Scenarios: Resource partitioning
Frequency partitioning Third example: Configuration based spectrum partitioning
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
39/73
Radio Scenarios: Resource partitioning
Time partitioning
The resources used in Macro and Home eNBs can also be partitionedand coordinated in the time dimension. Different time zone or UL-DL
configurations between HeNBs and macro eNBs or among HeNBsunder specific conditions may provide some flexibility for interferencecoordination. However, it may also bring new interference risks. Furtherinterference mitigation methods based on the time partitioning needs to
.
Spatial partitioning
Due to uplink-downlink channel reciprocity, TDD HeNBs can use beamcoordination to improve interference conditions. For example, theHeNB can avoid beam collision with the Macro or other Home eNBs in
a proactive or reactive way. These mechanisms may require a certainamount of information exchange between the HeNBs.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
40/73
Interference ScenariosNumber Aggressor Victim Priority
1 UE attached to Home eNode B Macro eNode B Uplink Yes
2 Home eNode B Macro eNode B Downlink Yes
3 UE attached to Macro eNode B Home eNode B Uplink Yes
4 Macro eNode B Home eNode B Downlink
6 Home eNode B Home eNode B Downlink Yes
7 UE attached to Home eNode Band/or Home eNode B
Other System
8 Other System UE attached to Home
eNode B and/or HomeeNode B
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
41/73
Interference Scenarios
Downlink Uplink
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
42/73
RF Aspects: HeNB output power
From HeNB coverage and capacity point of view, large output power could beattractive.
However, the maximum output power should be limited in order to control the
downlink interference from HeNB towards macrocell layer. So, the maximum HeNB output power should be a trade-off between the HeNB
performance and the interference towards close-by macrocell users, which donot have access to the HeNB.
Based on 3GPP studies the allowed out ut ower of the Home BS is limited to < + 20 dBm for 1 transmit antenna
< + 17 dBm for 2 transmit antennas < + 14 dBm for 4 transmit antennas
(< + 11 dBm for 8 transmit antennas, release 10)
Yet, aim is to use adaptive power setting rather than fixed output power.
In first HNB products the output power will be fixed and in most deployments
between 0dBm and 10dBm.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
43/73
HeNB measurements and adaptation
The objectives of the HeNB measurements are to provide sufficient information to the HeNB for the purpose of
interference mitigation to provide sufficient information to the HeNB such that the HeNBcoverage can be maintained.
According to the measurement type, there are two options tocollect measurements: From connected Mode UEs attached to the HeNB
Via a DL Receiver function within the HeNB itself. Such DL receiverfunction is also called Network Listen Mode (NLM), RadioEnvironment Measurement (REM) or "HeNB Sniffer".
These measurements can also be used during the HeNBself-configuration process
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
44/73
LTE Rel.8 measurements in UE
RSSI, which is the total received wideband power on a givenfrequency (from all sources).
Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), which for aparticular cell is the average of the power measured (and theaverage between receiver branches) of the resourcee emen s a con a n ce -spec c re erence s gna s.
Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ) is the ratio of theRSRP and the E-UTRA Carrier Received Signal StrengthIndicator (RSSI), for the reference signals.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
45/73
HeNB System Measurements (1/4):
Measurements from all cells
Measurement Type PurposeMeasurement
Source(s)
ReceivedInterference Power
Calculation of UL interferencetowards HeNB (from MUE)
HeNB UL Receiver
or examp e, a ece ve n er erence ower measuremen va ue arger an
a pre-defined threshold would mean that at least an MUE which is interferedby a HeNB is close to the HeNB and that the MUE's Tx power would causesignificant interference towards the HeNB. This measurement value may beused in calculating path loss between the HeNB and the MUE assuming thata single MUE dominates the interference.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
46/73
HeNB System Measurements (2/4):
Measurements to identify surrounding celllayers
Measurement Type Purpose MeasurementSource(s)
Cell reselection priorityinformation
Distinction between cell types basedon frequency layer priority
HeNB DL Receiver
CSG status and ID Distinction between cell layersbased on CSG, and self-construction of neighbour list,
HeNB DL Receiver
HeNB System Measurements (3/4):
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
47/73
HeNB System Measurements (3/4):Measurements from macro cell layer
Measurement Type PurposeMeasurement
Source(s)
Co-channel RSRP
Calculation of co-channel DL interferencetowards macro UEs (from HeNB)Calculation of co-channel UL interferencetowards macro layer (from HUEs)
Calculation of co-channel UL interferencetowards HeNB (from MUEs) based onestimated MUE Tx powerDetermine coverage of macro cell (foro timization of h brid cell confi uration
HeNB DL Receiver
MUE (in case of hybridcell)
Co-channel RSRQDetermine quality of macro cell (foroptimization of hybrid cell configuration)
HeNB DL Receiver
MUE (in case of hybridcell)
Reference SignalTransmission Power
Estimation of path loss from to MeNB HeNB DL Receiver
Physical + Global Cell IDAllow HeNB to Instruct UEs to measurespecific cells.Allow UE to report discovered cells to HeNB.
HeNB DL Receiver
Detection of UL RS Detection of victim UE HeNB UL Receiver
RSRP = Reference Symbol Received Power
RSRQ = Reference Symbol Received QualityRS = Reference Signal
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
48/73
HeNB System Measurements (4/4):
Measurements of other HeNB cells
Measurement Type PurposeMeasurement
Source(s)
Co-channel RSRP
Calculation of co-channel DL interferencetowards neighbour HUEs (from HeNB)Calculation of co-channel UL interferencetowards neighbour HeNBs (from HUEs)
HeNB DL Receiver
Reference Signal
Transmission Power
Estimation of path loss from to HeNB HeNB DL Receiver
Physical + Global Cell ID Allow HeNB to Instruct UEs to measurespecific cellsAllow UE to report discovered cells toHeNB.
HeNB DL Receiver
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
49/73
3GPP Interference Control Proposals
In LTE HeNB system interference control utilize above discussedmeasurements and other information exchanged through network.
There are different methods proposed for the protection of controlchannels and data channels, see TR 36.921 for details.
Proposed methods include both general approaches such as frequency partitioning and power control, and
LTE specific methods
Example of the latter methods is the control channel interferencemanagement based on fixed time-frequency location of controlinformation: If adjacent HeNBs apply time and/or frequency shift in DL transmissions =>
not all control channels are overlapping. If data channel transmission issuspended on radio resources that are used for control in adjacent cells,then control channel detection is clearly improved; see next slide.
Control region (36 subcarriers x 1
SF-1 SF-2 LegendSF-3SF-0
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
50/73
Control region (36 subcarriers x 1
OFDM symbol)
DL resources available for scheduling(36 subcarriers x 1 OFDM symbol)
Macro-eNB (one
unit on x-axis is 1
OFDM symbol ~
71 us and one
unit on the y-axis
is 3 PRBs or 36
subcarriers)
SSCH
PBCH
PBCH
PBCH
PBCH
PSCH
PBCH = Physical Broadcast CHannel
Common macro-eNB and HeNB DL
bandwidth allocation
SF-2
SSCH
PSCH
PBCH
PBCH
PBCH
PBCH
SF-0 SF-1SF-9
Home-eNB, DLframe timing
offset by k = 16
OFDM symbols
PSCH, SSCH = Primary and Secondary
Synchronization Channels.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
51/73
Femtocell Networks: Some Researchproblems
S h 1/2
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
52/73
Some research areas 1/2
Femtocell research classification: General level small cell/heterogeneous system research: Aim is
usually to find basic principles and new theoretical aspects. System specific research: existing specifications form the
framework for the research. Aim is usually to proposeenhancements/extensions to existing systems.
Interference: Management and avoidance (e.g. scheduling of transmissions,
Suppression (e.g. tranceiver algorithms like beamforming andadvanced receivers) Interference between macro and femto layers and within femto
layer.
Radio resource management
Scheduling of resources between macro and femto layers Static vs dynamic resource allocation. Load balancing between macrocells and (open access) femtocells
S h 2/2
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
53/73
Some research areas 2/2
Power allocation/calibration for femtocells How to set TX powers in femtocells?
How to dynamically adjust TX powers in femtocells? Self-configuration and optimization
Femtocell networks can be unplanned (user deployed femtocells),or lanned o erator de lo ed femtocells .
Self-configuration and optimization algorithms needed to tune thenetwork.
Mobility Between femtocells and macrocells
Between femtocells
Mobility issues related to femtocells has not been widelyinvestigated.
C iti l i t f A Si l E l
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
54/73
Critical interference: A Simple Example
2
Consider DL interference problem of the figure.For the rates there holds:
2
( )mmmmmfffff
BWARBWAR
+=
+=
1log1log
2
2(*)
11
2,2,121
222
1,1,212
111
/
/
/
fmN
m
fmN
f
IILPP
LP
IILPP
+++=
+++
=
In (*) A and Bare constants that can be used to fit rates with some practical systemslike LTE (P. Mogensen, W. Na, I. Z. Kovacs, et al., LTE capacity compared to theshannon bound, in Proceedings of the IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference(VTC 07), pp. 12341238, April 2007.
(**)
Critical interference A Simple Example
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
55/73
Critical interference: A Simple Example
In general there holds:
Let us consider an illustrative example where we ignore terms If,kand Im,k related to other femtocell and macrocell interference. Then
2121122211 ,, PPLLLL
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
56/73
Critical interference: A Simple Example
Numerical values for illustration:
( )
=+===
==
==
==
)43.0)25.12/(11log88.0/(,4,3
indoor UE)(0),outdoor UE(20
indoor UE)(20),outdoor UE(0
10,46
2min
1212
2222
21
WRdB
dBLdBL
dBLdBL
dBmPdBmP
WW
WW
Assume that femtocell is 1km distance from macrocell eNB.
If UE is outside and there is 20dB attenuation towards indoor femtocell,
then macrocell UE should be at least 33.5 meters away from femto eNB. If macrocell UE is indoors, then 335 meter separation is needed so that
minimum SINR requirement is fulfilled. This is impossible.
)indoorsUE(335.0outdoors)UE(0335.0
=
=
aa
Concluding remark: CSG femtocells may
create local holes on macrocellular coverage.
Interference management approaches
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
57/73
Interference management approaches
(femto-macro layer interference) Dedicated frequency carrier for femtocells (not effective and costly
for operators).
Static split of the carrier frequency between macro and femto layers
Not feasible approach in single carrier systems like HSPA Brick wall separation of femto and macro spectrum (in e.g. LTE) is easy but
can be ineffective since load in femto layer and macro layer may vary a lotduring the day.
ynam c usage o requency resources:
Separation of femtocell and macrocell transmissions in frequency requireseither active information exchange between macro and femto layers orpredefined rules for spectrum usage. Femtocell backhaul do not supportreal time resource management (i.e. within fast fading coherence time)
Research question: How to design effective and simple(frequency) resource allocation methods when information
exchange between femto and macro layers is limited, load on layersvary and network topology may change (femtocell switched on andoff)? For some solutions and references, see e.g. TR 36.921
Interference management approaches
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
58/73
Interference management approaches
(femto-macro layer interference) Multiantenna processing
Interference suppression by e.g. femto eNB null steering is
effective only if channel is directive and accurate channelinformation is available.
The number of antennas in femto eNBs is expected to be small=
of the interference. Femto eNB transmit power allocation/control
Tool for system optimization.
Not necessarily effective approach when solving instantaneous
interference problems.
Example: Dynamic usage of frequency
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
59/73
Example: Dynamic usage of frequency
resources Femtocell operation frequency can be limited since SNR is usually
high and number of users is small in femtocells.
Macrocell operation frequency cannot be limited since SNR can be
low and number of users maybe large. LTE example:
Let us reserve n frequency resource blocks exclusively for macrocell userswhile rest of the band can be used by both femtocells and macriocells.
Macrocell will schedule to (femtocell) interference free resources users that
are close to femtocells. Question: How macrocell know that some of its users heavily suffer from
femtocell interference?
Exclusive resources for
macrocell users
Resources used by both
macrocell and femtocells
Example: Dynamic usage of frequency
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
60/73
Example: Dynamic usage of frequency
resources
UE measures strength of
the received signal fromHeNB and detect its ID
HeNB Broadcast UE send measurement
In LTE macrocell UE can measure the broadcasted reference signalfrom HeNB. Broadcast channels carry also HeNB identity (ID).
UE then send measurement results to macrocell eNB that knowsHeNB(s) that interfere UE. If there is critical interference, then eNB
can assign exclusive resources for UE. In this approach there is a trade-off between user rates on femtocell
and macrocell.
Interference problem
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
61/73
Interference problem
within the femto layer:Illustration
Part of a row building including
3 closed femtocells and 3terminals.
Radio operations on the same
1
2
2
1
requency carr er.
Dedicated signal: Green arrows
Interference: Red arrows
3
3
Managing the interference within the
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
62/73
Managing the interference within the
femto layer: Transmit power allocation Local interference problems between femtocells occur due to
unplanned nature of the femto network. Especially when network consists of user deployed femto eNBs
and Closed Subscriber Group configuration is used.
Power allocation can be used to optimize femtocell operations.
Two hases of ower allocation: When managing (roughly) the interference between macro and
femto layers it is assumed that femto eNBs close to macrocell eNBcan use higher TX power than femto eNBs on macrocell edge.
When managing the interference within femto layer the TX powersare adjusted such that local femto operations are optimized.
Power allocation approaches: Distributed and centralized.
Remark: Femto eNBs are turned on and switched off
by users => local femto network topology is dynamic
Distributed vs centralized approach
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
63/73
Distributed vs centralized approach
In (extremely) distributed approach femtocells operateindependently: situation is similar like in WLAN
In (extremely) centralized approach the femto manager have allchannel information and can accurately adjust femto eNB TX
powers.
Measurement reports
Cell 1 Femto manager(connected to
Measurement reports
Cell K
All measurementinformation is forwardedto the femto manager.
Practical femto networks are in between the extremes.Different manufacturers may apply different managementconcepts
Femto manager (or network OA&M) maycreate interference matrices etc
Interference problem within the femto layer:
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
64/73
Interference problem within the femto layer:
Power calibration problem example Performance criteria example:
0,,
,,
,
+
=
km mkjmNkkjk
kj LPP
LP
NBfemtothinpoweronTransmissi=k kP
(*)
The SINR requirement (*) aims to guarantee a certain level of
service for femtocell users. We say that user is in outage if SINR issmaller than
0.
powernoiseWhite
receiverin theSINRRequired
emtotancetnt term naetweenossat
0
,,
=
=
=
N
mkj
P
m
Interference problem within the femto layer:
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
65/73
p b y
Power calibration problem example Let
kbe a random variable (SINR in the kth cell). Then, instead of
(1), we may define a statistical performance requirement
where right side defines the probability for outage. This kind of
( ) outk PrPr 0 =
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
66/73
p y
Power calibration problem example The power allocation problem when goal is to guarantee a certain
service level with minimum transmission powers:
( )
=
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
67/73
Femtocell Networks: The Future
General future developments
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
68/73
p
Chipset for femto base stations will become cheaper due to massproduction => at some point femto NB will be an integral part of allDSL boxes (and desk computers too???).
This development takes place only if femtocell concept becomes aglobal success.
Femtocell conce t rovides a natural la round for various flexiblespectrum usage approaches
Example: joint femtocell spectrum for all operators.
Different cognitive radio applications may also become part of femtocellconcept (e.g. spectrum sensing).
Femto management systems will become more sophisticated.
Specifications will provide better means to control femtocelloperations.
One potential aspect: Dense
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
69/73
p p
heterogeneous networks In addition to femtocells
various M2Mcommunication may take
place on mobilecommunication spectrum.
The priorities of different
well as QoSrequirements.
This may lead to localheterogeneous systemswhere femtocells need to
share the spectrum withM2M communication.
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
70/73
Some reference material
General level publications
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
71/73
p
P. Lin et al: Macro-femto heterogeneous networkdeployment and management: from business models to
technical solutions, IEEE Wireless Communications,June 2011.
M. Yavuz et al: Interference Mana ement andPerformance Analysis of UMTS/HSPA+ Femtocells,
IEEE Communications Magazine, September 2009.
V. Chandrasekhar, J. G. Andrews, and A. Gatherer:Femtocell networks: a survey, IEEE Communications
Magazine, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 5967, 2008.
3GPP Home (e)NodeB Concept
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
72/73
3GPP TS 22.220 V10.7.0 (2011-6)
3GPP TR 23.830 V9.0.0 (2009-09; partly outdated)
3GPP TS 25.467 V10.0.0 (2010-12; focus on UTRAN)
3GPP TR 36.921 V10.0.0 (2011-04)
3GPP TR 36.922 V10.0.0 (2011-04)
3GPP TS 36.104 V10.3.0 (2011-06)
3GPP TR 25.967 V10.0.0 (2011-04)
Some recent technical studies
7/29/2019 Femtocells Aalto University
73/73
O. Simeone, E. Erkip, and S. Shamai Shitz: Robust Transmission andInterference Management For Femtocells with Unreliable Network Access,IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, no. 9, December2010.
S. Park, W. Seo, et al: Beam Subset Selection Strategy for Interference
Reduction in Two-Tier Femtocell Networks, IEEE Transactions on WirelessCommunications, vol. 9, no. 11, November 2010.
Han-Shin Jo et al: Self-Optimized Coverage Coordination in FemtocellNetworks, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 9, no. 10,
c o er .
M. Husso et al: InterferenceMitigation by Practical Transmit BeamformingMethods in Closed Femtocells, EURASIP Journal on WirelessCommunications and Networking, Vol. 2010.
Vikram Chandrasekhar et al: Coverage in Multi-Antenna Two-Tier Networks,IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 10, October 2009.
Vikram Chandrasekhar et al: Power Control in Two-Tier Femtocell Networks,
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 8, August 2009. Vikram Chandrasekhar et al: Spectrum Allocation in Tiered Cellular Networks,
IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 57 no. 10, October 2009.