F. Smart
Kyabram
November 2012
Prepared for the Fert$mart project
Fert$mart
Soil and Fertiliser Management Plan Making fertiliser profitable
Photos Lynne Strong
2
Fert$mart planning
This Soil and Fertiliser Management Plan has been prepared to meet the requirements of Dairy
Australia’s Fert$mart program which is funded by Dairy Australia and the Australian Government’s
Caring for Our Country Program.
The aim of the Fert$mart Soil and Fertiliser Management Plan (Fert$mart Plan) is to assist dairy
farmers reach higher levels of profitability and sustainability by providing recommendations to
improve nutrient use efficiency and soil health, and to reduce soil and nutrient losses. Fert$mart
aligns with the International Plant Nutrition Institute’s 4R’s principles of applying the right source of
nutrient, at the right rate, at the right time, and in right place.
This Fert$mart plan has been prepared by a Fertcare C accredited agronomist in Victoria, based on
the farm information provided, observations & farm advisor feedback during the on-farm visits in
September & October 2012. As well as reviewing the Fert$mart plan annually (as per planning cycle)
it is also important to review the ramifications in context of overall on-farm profitability with your
advisor.
Contents Fert$mart planning ................................................................................................................................. 2
Fertiliser Program 2012/2013 ................................................................................................................. 3
Key Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 4
Farm Details ............................................................................................................................................ 5
FMZ 1 – Permanent Pastures .................................................................................................................. 6
FMZ 2 – Permanent Pastures .................................................................................................................. 7
FMZ 3 – Permanent Pastures .................................................................................................................. 8
FMZ 4 – Permanent Pastures .................................................................................................................. 9
FMZ 5 – Permanent Pastures ................................................................................................................ 10
FMZ 5 – Annual Pastures ...................................................................................................................... 11
Farm Gate Nutrient Budget .................................................................................................................. 12
APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................... 13
Farm Map - FMZs .................................................................................................................................. 13
DPIV Soil Test Guidelines ...................................................................................................................... 14
DairySAT Fertiliser BMP ........................................................................................................................ 14
DairySAT Soils BMP ............................................................................................................................... 15
Soil/Plant tissue tests ............................................................................................................................ 16
Using Dairy Effluent as a Fertiliser (DPIV Fact Sheets)……………………………………………………………………… 21
Additional technical information is available on-line:
www.dairyaustralia.com.au Environment / Soils, Nutrients & Effluent
www.dpi.vic.gov.au Agriculture / Dairy / Managing Waste
www.dpi.vic.gov.au Agriculture / Dairy / Fertilising dairy pastures
www.dpi.vic.gov.au Agriculture / Dairy / Pasture Consumption Calculator
3
Fertiliser Program 2012/2013
Fertiliser products top-dressed unless otherwise indicated using DairySAT BMP (best management practices)
included in the appendix (pages 14-15). Products noted based on past use so discuss all aspects fully with
your Fertcare C accredited advisor.
Fertiliser kg/ha 2012 / 2013
FMZ Area N P K S Fertiliser Program
1 No 14-16 7.4 193 13 0 16 Spring 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
(Perm't)
Summer Nil
Autumn 1 x 150 kg/ha Single Super NPKS 0:9:0:11
Autumn 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
Winter 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
2 No 17-18 4.6 161 13 0 16 Spring 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
(Perm't)
Summer Nil
Autumn Gypsum required. Refer FMZ 2 notes
Autumn 1 x 150 kg/ha Single Super NPKS 0:9:0:11
Autumn 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
Winter 1 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
3 No 21-27 16.0 161 0 0 0 Spring 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
(Perm't)
Summer Nil
Autumn Gypsum required. Refer FMZ 3 notes
Autumn 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
Winter 1 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
4 No 28-31 10.1 129 0 0 0 Spring Irrigated with effluent pond liquid *
(Perm't)
Summer Irrigated with effluent pond liquid *
Autumn 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
Winter 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
5 No 33-36 13.5 129 21 24 27 Spring 1 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
(Perm't)
Summer Slurry likely to be applied
Autumn Gypsum required. Refer FMZ 5 notes
Autumn 1 x 300 kg/ha Super Potash 5:1 NPKS 0:7:8:9
Autumn 2 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
Winter 1 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
6 No 37-43 32.0 97 35 40 45 Spring 1 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
(Annual)
Summer Nil
Autumn Agricultural lime required. Refer FMZ 6 notes.
Autumn 1 x 500 kg/ha Super Potash 5:1 NPKS 0:7:8:9
Autumn 1 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
Winter 1 x 70 kg/ha Urea NPKS 46:0:0:0
Milking area 83.6
Bull & Calves 6.6
Other areas 14.8
Total 105.0
* Effluent pond liquid usually applied on FMZ 4 but slurry will be pumped out onto FMZ 6 in summer 2013.
4
Key Recommendations
• Baseline topsoil phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and sulphur (S) levels are all generally
high across the milking area which is not unexpected after the drought and high inputs
of supplementary feed.
• The Fert$mart plan has identified nitrogen (N) use as a key consideration within the
fertiliser program moving forward. As discussed record the number of grazings and
silage yields (x paddock) annually to confirm intensity of use across the milking area.
It is important to benchmark your nitrogen use, supplementary feed use & production
per ha data to provide a guide to any change in the N program.
Your key criteria for 2011/12 is compared with the top 25% farms in Northern Victoria
taken from the 2011/12 DPI Dairyfarm Monitor Project (total of 24 farms).
Note the milking area used with the DPI Dairyfarm Monitor project includes permanent
& annual pastures on an equal basis.
Supplementary Stocking Supplementary Production Actual N
feed t DM/cow rate/ha feed DM/t/ha kg MS /ha use/ha
F Smart 4.30 t DM/cow x 3.3 SR = 14.3 t DM/ha 1555 Kg MS/ha 95 kg N/ha
Top 25% 3.20 t DM/cow x 2.2 SR = 7.00 t DM/ha 1256 Kg MS/ha 120 kg N/ha
• The effluent pond will be emptied onto the annual pasture (FMZ 6) over summer. In
2013/14 ensure the effluent pond liquid is shandied and applied over paddocks No
28-31 (10.1ha).
• The farmgate nutrient balance indicates current positive balance based on 2011/12
for potassium (K) and slight negative for phosphorus (P) with nil inputs. It is
recognised the distribution is not consistent across the property. Potassium is
adequately supplied but farm milking area maintenance P requirements are approx.
20 kg/ha.
• Pasture herbage testing identified copper levels are borderline and should be
monitored again in spring 2013 to confirm trends. Ameliorant use (gypsum and / or
agricultural lime) will help build soil calcium reserves over time while gypsum will
help leach sodium.
• Review the Fert$mart plan again in mid-2013 with your Fertcare C accredited
advisor.
• Adopt bi-annual soil monitoring program (given your high fertility status) except for
FMZ 4 & 6 which should be tested annually.
5
Farm Details
Fert Smart purchased the Back Road, Kyabram property back in 2001 and supply Beaut Milk.
The irrigated dairy farm property has total farm area of 105 ha with 15.4 ha of other use
area. The milking area is 83 ha milking area (51.6 ha permanent & 32 ha annual) and 6.6 ha
calf / bull paddocks.
Herd size was 270 cows in 2011/12 and will be increased to 290 cows for 2012/13. Herd has
60/40 split between spring & autumn calving. Herd is cross bred with average cow size 500
kg
Calves are reared at home but all young stock (100 head) are agisted off the home property.
During the drought pastures were dried off and high rates of supplementary feed bought
onto the property. All pastures have been renovated since the drought.
Nitrogen only was used last season (average of 95 kg N/ha across the milking area). Fertiliser
expenditure was $17,653 in 2010/11.
The milking area has been split into 6 farm management zones (FMZ) as outlined.
FMZ AREA
1 7.4 Permanent pasture No 14 - 16
2 4.6 Permanent pasture No 17 - 18
3 16.0 Permanent pasture No 21 - 27
4 10.0 Permanent pasture No 28 - 31
5 13.4 Permanent pasture No 33 - 36
6 32.0 Annual pasture No 37 - 43
83.4 ha
The property has a turkey nest effluent dam (1.0 Ml), turkey nest recycle dam
(4 Ml) and a new recycle sump on the annual paddocks (3.0 Ml). Recently completed
irrigation works have added a sump and meant all water now remains on the property.
The Accounting for Nutrients Project identified that dairy cows spent a small proportion of
their time in the dairy (2%) and yards (9%). This was followed by time spent on feedpads
(11%) and holding areas (26%) but the most significant was in the paddock (but heavily
weighted towards paddocks close to the dairy).
The intention is to pump out the effluent pond over summer 2012/13 onto the annual
pastures of FMZ 6 (which have low fertility base).
‘Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser’ notes are attached for future use (Appendices, page 27).
6
2012 / 2013 Fertiliser program: Permanent Pastures
FMZ 1 – Permanent Pastures
Area 7.4 ha Comprising farm map paddocks No 14-15-16
Background: Old permanent pasture paddocks close to dairy. Ryegrass & clover paddocks
are rotationally grazed (usually 12-14 x grazings).
Soil structure: Friable brown clay loam soils that are not saline or sodic.
However soil tests indicate the calcium:magnesium ratio is low and gypsum is
the preferred remedial ameliorant.
Soil health: Organic carbon levels are high (4.5%) and satisfactory. Pastures have good
root depth and there was no indication of pest or disease issues.
However the pasture rootmats are quite thick and specific grazing
management is required.
Past history: No historical soil data provided (due to the drought).
Past inputs: High rates of N (estimate of 5-6 x 80 kg/ha Urea) applied over 2011/12. Nil
phosphorus applied for at least 5 years
Desired soil fertility levels based on DPI guidelines (refer appendix)
Olsen P > 25.0 mg/kg Maintenance P required for 2012/13
Colwell K > 220.0 mg/kg Nil maintenance K requirement for 2012/13
KCL 40 S > 10.5 mg/kg Nil maintenance S requirement for 2012/13
• Fertiliser inputs (particularly N) are based on high intensity of grazing use and
maintenance P is being applied given nil P inputs in recent times.
• Soil tests have not identified any trace nutrient concerns.
Timing Rate Product
Spring Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Spring Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Summer Nil
Autumn Early 150 kg/ha Single Super (NPKS 0:9:0:11)
Autumn Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Autumn Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Winter Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0) or equivalent Easy N
Winter Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0) or equivalent Easy N
Managing risk:
• Apply 2.5 t/ha gypsum prior to oversowing any of the paddocks in autumn 2014 using
good quality (graded) product which will help pasture establishment and improve
ground cover.
• During winter foliar N (Easy N) may be a cost effective option
• All irrigation water applied to this section is recycled.
7
2012 / 2013 Fertiliser program: Permanent Pastures
FMZ 2 – Permanent Pastures
Area 4.6 ha Comprising farm map paddocks No 17 - 18
Background: Lasered 12 months ago and now resown to ryegrass & clover. The paddocks
are rotationally grazed (usually 12 x grazings) and had millet direct drilled last
summer
Soil structure: Friable brown clay loam soils that are not saline or sodic.
However soil tests indicate the calcium:magnesium ratio is low and sodium
levels are only just within desired levels. Gypsum is the preferred remedial
ameliorant.
Soil health: Organic carbon levels are high (4.0%) and satisfactory. Pastures currently
have good root depth and there was no indication of pest or disease issues.
New pastures often struggle through the peak summer months and the N
program has been adjusted to help thicken up the pasture prior to the hot
weather.
Past history: No historical soil data provided (due to the drought).
Past inputs: Regular N applications over 2011/12.
Desired soil fertility levels based on DPI guidelines (refer appendix)
Olsen P > 25.0 mg/kg Maintenance P required for 2012/13
Colwell K > 220.0 mg/kg Nil maintenance K requirement for 2012/13
KCL 40 S > 10.5 mg/kg Maintenance S required for 2012/13
• Fertiliser inputs (particularly N) are based on high intensity of grazing use and
maintenance P is being applied given nil P inputs in recent times.
• Soil tests have not identified any trace nutrient concerns.
Timing Rate Product
Spring Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Spring Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Summer Nil
Autumn Early 150 kg/ha Single Super (NPKS 0:9:0:11)
Autumn Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Autumn Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Winter 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Managing risk:
• Gypsum is required (2.5 t/ha) when these paddocks are grazed out & direct drilled in
autumn 2013 (using a graded product).
• All irrigation water applied to this section is recycled.
8
2012 / 2013 Fertiliser program: Permanent Pastures
FMZ 3 – Permanent Pastures
Area 16.0 ha Comprising farm map paddocks No 21-22-23-24-25-26-27
Background: Permanent ryegrass & clover paddocks that are rotationally grazed.
Soil structure: Sticky clay based soils that are poorly structured. Soil tests confirm the
topsoils are sodic and have calcium:magnesium ratio < 1:1 which is a major
concern. Pasture tests also indicate low herbage Ca levels. Gypsum is the
preferred remedial ameliorant.
Soil health: Organic carbon levels are high (5.80 %) and satisfactory. Pasture testing
indicated high molybdenum levels so monitor livestock for any signs of low
copper availability. Pasture chloride & sodium levels are elevated and calcium
levels are low which is not unexpected.
Past history: No historical soil data provided (due to the drought).
Past inputs: Regular applications of 80 kg/ha Urea applied over 2011/12.
Desired soil fertility levels based on DPI guidelines (refer appendix)
Olsen P > 25.0 mg/kg Nil maintenance P requirement for 2012/13
Colwell K > 220.0 mg/kg Nil maintenance K requirement for 2012/13
KCL 40 S > 10.5 mg/kg Nil maintenance S requirement for 2012/13
• High P levels on this section
• Follow up livestock implications with the pasture herbage data.
Timing Rate Product
Spring Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Spring Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Spring Late High rates of gypsum required with full renovation
and summer crop as outlined
Summer Nil
Autumn Gypsum required if oversowing as outlined
Autumn Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Autumn Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Winter 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Managing risk:
• Maintaining pasture density over the summer months is the challenge on these poorly
structured soils. High rates of gypsum (5.0 tonne/ha) have been recommended when it
can be incorporated as part of full renovation. With topdressing apply 2.5 t/ha gypsum
prior to over-sowing any of the paddocks in autumn 2013 using good quality (graded)
product.
• Recently No 27 paddock has been sprayed out and had gypsum applied and resown to
permanent pasture with poor establishment. Assess the situation with your advisor and be
prepared to sow summer crop (millet) if necessary.
9
2012 / 2013 Fertiliser program: Permanent Pastures
FMZ 4 – Permanent Pastures
Area 10.0 ha Comprising farm map paddocks No 28-29-30-31
Background: Effluent pond liquid is shandied with irrigation supply and gravity fed
primarily to No 31 paddock. Permanent ryegrass & clover paddocks are
rotationally grazed.
Soil structure: Friable brown clay loam soils that are not saline or sodic.
However soil tests indicate the calcium:magnesium ratio is low. Gypsum is the
preferred remedial ameliorant.
Soil health: Organic carbon levels are moderately high (3.8%) and satisfactory. Pastures
have good root depth and there was no indication of pest or disease issues.
Past history: No historical soil data provided.
Past inputs: Strategic N use over 2011/12.
Desired soil fertility levels based on DPI guidelines (refer appendix)
Olsen P > 25.0 mg/kg Nil maintenance P requirement for 2012/13
Colwell K > 220.0 mg/kg Nil maintenance K requirement for 2012/13
KCL 40 S > 10.5 mg/kg Nil maintenance S requirement for 2012/13
• High soil PKS fertility and higher pH as expected as effluent pond liquid is currently
gravity fed (& shandied) to irrigate this section.
• Soil tests have not identified any trace nutrient concerns.
Timing Rate Product
Spring Nil Low rates of effluent applied
Summer Nil Low rates of effluent applied
Autumn Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Autumn Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Winter Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Winter Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Managing risk:
• The effluent pond will be pumped out over summer onto the annual pastures (FMZ 6)
as the soil fertility base is significantly lower than the rest of the property. Expect low
rates of effluent to be applied on this section.
• Apply 2.5 t/ha gypsum if any of the paddocks are direct drilled in autumn 2014 to
improve pasture density (using good quality graded product).
• All irrigation water applied to this section is recycled.
10
2012 / 2013 Fertiliser program: Permanent Pastures
FMZ 5 – Permanent Pastures
Area 13.4 ha Comprising farm map paddocks No 33-34-35-36
Background: Lasered 12 months ago and resown to ryegrass & clover paddocks that are
rotationally grazed (usually 12 x grazings).
Soil structure: Brown clay loam soils that are not saline. However soil tests indicate the
calcium:magnesium ratio is low and sodium levels are elevated. Gypsum is the
preferred remedial ameliorant.
Soil health: Organic carbon levels are moderately high (3.90 %) but will benefit from
regular oversowing in the future. Pastures have good root depth and there was
no indication of pest or disease issues. New pastures often struggle through the
peak summer months and the N program has been adjusted accordingly.
Pasture testing indicated moderate molybdenum and borderline copper levels.
Pasture chloride & sodium levels are elevated while calcium levels are low
which is not unexpected.
Past history: No historical soil data provided.
Past inputs: Regular Urea inputs applied over 2011/12.
Desired soil fertility levels based on DPI guidelines (refer appendix)
Olsen P > 25.0 mg/kg Maintenance P required for 2012/13
Colwell K > 220.0 mg/kg Maintenance K required for 2012/13
KCL 40 S > 10.5 mg/kg Nil maintenance S requirement for 2012/13
• Maintenance P is being applied given nil P inputs in recent times.
• Soil tests have not identified any trace nutrient concerns.
Timing Rate Product
Spring 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Summer Nil
Autumn Gypsum required when oversowing as outlined
Autumn Early 300 kg/ha Super Potash 5:1 (NPKS 0:7:8:9)
Autumn Early 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Autumn Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Winter 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Managing risk:
• Gypsum is required (2.5 t/ha) when these paddocks are grazed out & direct drilled in
autumn 2013 (using a graded product).
All irrigation water applied to this section is recycled.
11
2012 / 2013 Fertiliser program: Annual Pastures
FMZ 5 – Annual Pastures
Area 32.0 ha comprising farm map paddocks No 37-38-39-40-41-42-43
Background: Annual ryegrass / shaftal pasture paddocks that were flooded in early 2012.
Only grazed 3 times this season and will be dried off early.
Soil structure: Brown clay loam soils that are not saline but soil tests indicate the
calcium:magnesium ratio is low and sodium levels are just within desired
levels. Agricultural lime is the preferred ameliorant to supply calcium (and lift
pH levels).
Soil health: Organic carbon levels are only moderate (2.60 %) but the existing pastures
looked healthy. Annual pastures had root disease problems last season which
have been addressed. Pasture testing indicated low molybdenum but liming
will improve availability. Herbage calcium & copper levels are marginal so
monitor trends again next spring. Herbage sodium levels are elevated which is
not unexpected.
Past inputs: No historical soil data provided and nil fertiliser inputs last season with Super
Potash (NPKS 0:7:13:8) applied the previous season.
Desired soil fertility levels based on DPI guidelines (refer appendix)
Olsen P > 22.0 mg/kg Capital P required for 2012/13
Colwell K > 250.0 mg/kg Maintenance K required for 2012/13
KCL 40 S > 10.5 mg/kg Maintenance S required for 2012/13
• Annual pastures down the back of the property have low P levels as expected.
• Soil tests have not identified any trace nutrient concerns.
Timing Rate Product
Spring 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Summer Nil
Summer Manure slurry will be pumped across paddocks and
lightly incorporated.
Autumn 2.50 t/ha Apply agricultural straight calcium carbonate lime
well before sowing using> 80 ENV
(effective neutralising value) product.
Autumn 500 kg/ha Super Potash 5:1 (NPKS 0:7:8:9) preferably prior
to sowing or after establishment
Autumn Late 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Winter 70 kg/ha Urea (NPKS 46:0:0:0)
Managing risk:
• Potassium inputs are not likely to be required in 2013/14 after the slurry application
but check soil fertility levels again in mid-2013.
• Record the actual volume of manure slurry applied over summer.
• All irrigation water applied to this section is recycled.
12
Farm Gate Nutrient Budget
13
APPENDICES
Farm Map - FMZs
14
DPIV Soil Test Guidelines
15
FERTILISER
Below Standard Practice Acceptable Practice Above Acceptable Practice
Do not understand why you would need
information on soil fertility.
Understand why soil sampling is being undertaken
and follow a planned approach.
No information on soil fertility or data > 3yrs old. Fertiliser decisions are based on soil sampling
from the past three years and soil fertility trends.
Fertiliser decisions are based on soil sampling
every one to two years, and soil fertility trends.
Plant sampling (tissue testing) and soil sampling
used to fine-tune nutrient requirements.
Unsure what to consider when soil sampling. Soil samples are taken from three or four
representative areas of the farm.
Separate soil samples are taken from all Farm
Management Zones, or paddocks.
Unaware of correct soil sampling techniques. Correct soil sampling techniques have been
checked and are used.
Soil test sites are located using GPS and mapped
for future reference.
Do not use a soil testing laboratory that is
National Association of Testing Authorities
(NATA) accredited or Australian Soil and Plant
Analysis Council (ASAPC) certified for the
analysis required.
Use a soil testing laboratory that is National
Association of Testing Authorities (NATA)
accredited or Australian Soil and Plant Analysis
Council (ASPAC) certified for the analysis required.
Do not use a soil test results as part of nutrient
management decisions.
Soil test results and soil nutrient target levels are
used as part of making nutrient management
decisions.
So
il
Co
nst
rain
ts Soil constraints and other limiting factors are not
considered before applying fertilisers.
Soil constraints and other limiting factors are
considered before determining nutrient
requirements.
Nu
trie
nt
Bu
dg
et
Do not use a nutrient budget (a calculation of what
comes onto the farm and what leaves it).
Use a nutrient budget that is calculated over the
whole farm, i.e. a farmgate nutrient budget.
Calculate nutrient budgets for different Farm
Management Zones.
Use the same rate of fertiliser on all paddocks
without considering nutrient requirements.
Target your nutrient rates/types for different areas
of the farm based on soil test results.
Target your nutrient rates/types for different areas
of the farm based on your soil test results, nutrient
budgets, and areas where there is a high risk of
nutrient loss through run-off and drainage.
Do not consider effluent as a fertiliser. Effluent is used as a fertiliser with rates
determined by soil nutrient requirements and soil
test results.
Effluent is used as a fertiliser with rates
determined by soil nutrient requirements, soil test
results, effluent nutrient value, and the financial
value to the farm.
Nutrient application rates are not determined by a
trained farmer or adviser.
Nutrient application rates are determined by a
farmer or advisor with training in the
interpretation of soil test results and calculating
nutrient application rates according to the 4Rs
principles.
Nutrient application rates are determined by a
Fertcare accredited advisor, or farmer with
accredited training in soil test interpretation.
Do not calibrate the fertiliser spreader or use an
Accuspread-accredited spreader.
Calibrate the fertiliser spreader or use an
Accuspread-accredited spreader.
Proximity to waterways or drainage lines is not
considered.
A buffer distance is maintained between areas
where fertiliser/effluent is applied and waterways
or drainage lines.
Do not know if there are farm areas with a high risk
of nutrient loss through runoff and leaching.
Farm areas with a high risk of nutrient loss through
runoff and leaching have been identified and
fertiliser is not applied in these areas. These areas
may include wet spots, steep areas etc.
Fertiliser is applied to nutrient built-up areas, such
as stock camps, gateways, troughs, etc.
Fertiliser is not applied to nutrient build up areas.
Fertiliser is applied without considering soil
moisture levels, weather forecasts or irrigation
schedules.
Fertiliser is applied at times when the risk of run-
off/leaching is low. The risk may be determined
by considering soil moisture, weather forecasts
and irrigation schedules.
No records of soil fertility or fertiliser management
are kept.
Soil fertility records and fertiliser management
are kept for each paddock or Farm Management
Zone and are used for making fertiliser decisions.
No documented farm nutrient management plan A farm nutrient management plan is documented
and used to guide fertiliser applications.
The farm nutrient management plan is
documented and reviewed every 1-2 years.
Nu
trie
nt
ap
plic
ati
on
ra
tes
& s
pre
ad
ing
So
il S
am
plin
g &
An
aly
sis
Av
oid
ing
Nu
trie
nt
Loss
es
Pla
nn
ing
& R
eco
rd
ke
ep
ing
DairySAT Fertiliser BMP
16
SOILSBelow Standard Practice Acceptable Practice Above Acceptable Practice
Do not know if there is any erosion occurring on-
farm.
Understand the different types of erosion
occurring and their causes.
Visible erosion exists on-farm and there is no
management plan to address it.
A management plan is in place to minimise
erosion on-farm.
There is ongoing monitoring and review of the
management plans to minimise erosion.
There appears to be increasing erosion damage. Management practices have been implemented
to minimise erosion problems.
Management practices including engineering
solutions, where appropriate, are in place to
minimise erosion.
No maintenance of watercourses, drains, tracks
and eaves after flooding.
Water courses, drains, tracks and eaves are
maintained to prevent flood damage. Damage is
repaired as soon as possible after flooding.
Do not know if there are soil structure problems
across the farm.
Understand the different soil structure problems
that can occur, their causes and the extent of
their occurrence.
Pugging or compaction exists on-farm and there
are no management plans.
A management plan with a series of actions is
in place to address pugging and compaction on-
farm.
There is ongoing monitoring and review of the
management plans addressing pugging and
compaction.
There appears to be increasing pugging or
compaction.
Management practices have been implemented
to minimise pugging and compaction problems,
such as using sacrifice paddocks for feeding out
and managing stock movement in winter.
Management practices (including a feedpad) to
minimise compaction or pugging problems are
implemented and reviewed.
There appears to be increasing compaction and
surface sealing on cropping land.
Management practices have been implemented
to minimise compaction and surface sealing on
cropping land, such as reduced tillage.
Management practices have been implemented
to minimise compaction and surface sealing on
cropping land, such as reduced tillage and
controlled traffic farming.
Unsure if farm soils are saline or sodic, or if
farm water is saline.
Understand the causes of soil salinity and
sodicity, and how to identify and manage soils
and water with potential problems.
Sodic and saline areas on the farm have been
identified and recorded using soil test results
and visual observation. Water salinity is tested
and recorded annually.
Salinity problems exists on-farm and there is no
monitoring or management plans.
A management plan with a series of actions is
in place to address saline areas (e.g. drainage,
salt tolerant perennial pastures or trees).
There is ongoing monitoring and review of
management plans to minimise the impacts of
salinity. Management plans comply with
Regional NRM strategies.
Unaware of increased risk of irrigation on
salinity.
Understand how irrigation can increase soil
salinity levels, what to look out for and how to
manage salinity risks.
Whole-farm salinity mapping is conducted every
three years and salinity levels of irrigation water
are tested annually.
Soil salinity levels and the affected areas are
increasing due to irrigation.
Current irrigation practices aim to minimise salt
accumulation.
Irrigation rates, timing and frequency are
managed to minimise overwatering and
waterlogging.
Soil structural problems exist and there are no
management plans for sodic soils.
A management plan with a series of actions is
in place to address structural problems
associated with sodic soils (e.g. application of
gypsum or organic matter, and reduced tillage).
There is ongoing monitoring and review of
management practices to minimise the impacts
of sodic soils.
Unsure if farm soils are acidic, or becoming more
acidic.
Understand the causes of acidification, the effect
acid soils have on production, and how to monitor
and manage soil acidity before it becomes a
production problem.
Unsure if acidity problem is surface, subsurface or
both.
Soil pH levels are tested and recorded for each
Farm Management Zone every two to three years,
and pH trends are monitored for change.
Soil acidity is affecting production and there are no
management plans in place.
Management practices are in place to address
existing or increasing acidity problems (e.g. lime
application).
Management practices are in place to prevent
soil acidification and are reviewed very two to
three years.
So
il S
tru
ctu
re (
refe
rs t
o p
ug
gin
g &
com
pa
ctio
n)
Aci
dit
yE
rosi
on
(ty
pe
s: s
he
et,
tu
nn
el,
gu
lly,
rill
an
d w
ind
)S
alin
ity
/So
dic
ity
DairySAT Soils BMP
Soil/Plant tissue tests
16
Effluent
Fert$mart
F. Smart Kyabram
Requires Attention Nutrient Excess
17
Requires Attention Nutrient Excess
18
Requires Attention
19
Requires Attention
20
Requires Attention
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 1/9
Using Dairy Effluent as a FertiliserIt is easy to overlook the nutrients being accumulated around the farm as a result of typical farm activities. These include
nutrients deposited in pastures, laneways and animal loafing areas; nutrients added to pastures when fodder is fed out;
and the nutrient-rich effluent associated with dairy sheds and feedpads.
Dairy effluent is a natural fertiliser and soil conditioner and, if managed effectively, can enhance pasture growth and
improve soil structure.
It is estimated that, during one lactation, a 100-cow herd deposits on the dairy yard:
50 kg of phosphorus (equivalent to about 568 kg of single superphosphate).
250 kg of nitrogen (equivalent to about 540 kg of urea)
270 kg potassium (equivalent to 540 kg of muriate of potash).
Effluent can be utilised safely and effectively if it is applied in accordance with environmental, pasture growth and soil
fertility requirements.
What will you find out in this section?
At the completion of this section, you should:
Understand the legal requirements related to dairy effluent management.
Understand the different sources of dairy effluent on the farm.
Have knowledge of the nutrient levels in dairy effluent.
Know how to sample effluent.
Have knowledge of the methods of applying effluent to pastures and crops.
Understand the rate of effluent to apply to crops and pastures.
Have knowledge of where and when dairy effluent can be best used on the farm.
Be able to minimise risks to animal health from dairy effluent.
13.1 Legal requirements of dairy shed effluent management
Dairy effluent must be managed in such a way that it remains on the farm and does not contaminate ground or surface
waters. This is a legislative requirement under the state environment protection policies (SEPPs) on ground water and
water and is enforceable by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA).
The spreading or spraying of dairy effluent back on pastures and crops is a best-management practice. It makes good
use of the nutrients, organic matter and water collected in the effluent system, thus enhancing farm production and
lowering the risk of polluting streams or ground water.
13.2 What is in dairy effluent?
The dairy shed effluent stream largely consists of the manure and urine in wash down water. However, it also includes
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 2/9
detergents, gravel from the cows’ hooves, suspended soil particles, cow hair, milk, string, paper and other debris that
can collect around the dairy.
Some of the nutrients from the manure and urine will be in a form that is not immediately available for pasture plants.
However, research indicates 50% to 80% of the nitrogen content, about 50% of the phosphorous and almost all of the
potassium content will be in the available form.
13.2.1 Nutrient sources within an effluent system
Dairy shed
Dairy shed effluent contains a small but useable quantity of nutrients. Approximately 8% to 10% of the daily dung and
urine is dropped in the yards, depending on distance walked, time spent in the yards, and stress experienced during
milking. Table 13.1 shows the quantities of nutrients excreted per dairy cow per lactation in the shed and yards.
Table 13.1 Quantity of nutrients excreted in manure per dairy cow per lactation in the sheds and yards
Table 13.1 Quantity of nutrients excreted in manure per dairy cow per lactation in the sheds and yards
SourceNutrient Excreted in Manure per Cow per Lactation (kg)
Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium
Thompson (1989) 3.2 0.5 2.0
Average (various authors) 2.5 0.5 2.7
Range (various authors) 1.6 to 3.2 0.3 to 0.7 1.3 to 5.4
Source: Thompson (1989)
Dairy sump/trafficable solids trap
The sump or trap is the primary collection point for effluent and urine washed from the yard and shed areas, and
therefore it contains a rich source of nutrients. In summer, many farmers will apply effluents to pastures directly from the
sump to utilise nitrogen before losses occur through volatilisation and settling within the ponds.
Effluent ponds
The levels of nutrients in effluent ponds are significantly less than the levels in the fresh manure and urine. This is
because the wash down water dilutes the manure and urine, most of the solids settle out (sink to the bottom of the pond),
and some of the nutrients volatilise and are lost to the atmosphere.
However, understanding the nutrient value within the effluent ponds and being able to practically use these nutrients is
essential given storage ponds are designed to store effluent for only 4 to 6 months of the year. In addition, the anaerobic
(first) pond in a two-pond system needs to be almost completely emptied every 4 to 7 years to reduce the accumulation of
solids and salts, which eventually may impact on the pond’s functioning.
A large number of dairy effluent ponds have been sampled in Victoria to get an idea of the nutrient content in the effluent
(Tables 13.2 to 13.4). The amount of nutrients is expressed in kilograms per megalitre (kg/ML) of effluent. (A megalitre is
one million litres.)
Table 13.2 Nutrient, electrical conductivity and sodium levels from dairy effluent ponds in south-west Victoria
(storage or second ponds only)
LevelN
(kg/ML)
P
(kg/ML)
K
(kg/ML)
S
(kg/ML)pH (water)
Electrical
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
Sodium
Adsorption Ratio
Average 192 47 358 23 7.4 4800 4.6
Range 48 to 568 12 to 150 90 to 900 6 to 70 6.2 to 8.7 1000 to 10000 1.1 to 9.1
Source: John Kane, formerly DPI Warrnambool (pers. com.).
Table 13.3 Nutrient, electrical conductivity and sodium levels from dairy effluent ponds in south-east (Gippsland)
Victoria (all ponds)
LevelN
(kg/ML)
P
(kg/ML)
K
(kg/ML)
S
(kg/ML)pH (water)
Electrical
ConductivitySodium
Adsorption Ratio
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 3/9
(mS/cm)
Average 505 178 524 132* 7.5 3826 2.4
Range 43 to 2100 13 to 1400 67 to 3900 1 to 1300 6.8 to 8.2 1500 to 9300 0.7 to 9.1
Source: B. Bradshaw, DPI Ellinbank (pers. com.). *High levels due to large amounts of S in bore water being used.
Table 13.4 Nutrient, electrical conductivity and sodium levels from dairy effluent ponds in northern Victoria (single
ponds)
LevelN
(kg/ML)
P
(kg/ML)
K
(kg/ML)
S
(kg/ML)pH (water)
Electrical
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
Sodium
Adsorption Ratio
Average 277 57 309 23 7.5 1200 to 3900 4.1
Range 184 to 596 20 to 106 146 to 476 12 to 43 6.5 to 8.4 3050 1.0 to 9.0
Source: Scott McDonald, DPI Kyabram (pers. com.).
As expected, results varied widely. This variation is due to such factors as the age of effluent in ponds, whether the
sample was taken from the first or second pond in a two-pond system, and the level of dilution caused by varying
amounts of wash down water. To get a true picture of the nutrients in your effluent pond, you need to conduct regular
sampling, especially before desludging older stagnant ponds.
Feedpads and animal loafing areas
As dairy farms become more intensive in terms of stocking rate and production per cow, feedpads and animal loafing
areas are becoming increasingly common.
The intensive feeding and stocking of animals on an area for any length of time has a tendency to create nutrient hot
spots. The amount of nutrients being generated on the area and how those nutrients are managed and applied back to
pasture and crop systems are very important.
An adult cow (500 to 650 kg) is capable of producing 7% to 8% of her body weight in manure each day which equates to
40 to 60 kg of manure. Table 13.5 shows the nutrients in that manure and urine.
Table 13.5 Production of nutrients from a dairy cow
Nutrient
Kg/cow/day (500-kg cow) Kg/cow/day (600-kg cow)
Nitrogen (N) 0.225 0.270
Phosphorus (P) 0.047 0.056
Potassium (K) 0.145 0.174
Source: Goulburn Broken Feedpad Guidelines (2002).
The longer cows spend on holding yards and feedpad areas, the greater the amount of manure and nutrients deposited.
Management and redistribution of these nutrients back to pastures or crops are essential.
View guidelines on putting in feedpads
13.2.2 Nutrient movement within the pond system
Understanding the fate of nutrients and where they are accumulating is the key to effective nutrient management, as it
allows you to fine tune fertiliser decisions and manage farm hot spots.
Figure 13.1 shows the fate of nutrients in an anaerobic pond.
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 4/9
Figure 13.1 The fate of nutrients in an aneorobic pond
Table 13.6 shows the range in nutrient concentrations (kg per megalitre) at depth in the first (anaerobic) pond at
DemoDAIRY (south-west Victoria) prior to (P) and after (A) agitation.
Table 13.6 Nutrient concentrations at depth (kg/ML) in a pond prior to and after agitation (first pond)
Pond Depth
(m)
Nitrogen
(P/A)*
Phosphorus
(P/A)
Potassium
(P/A)
Sulphur
(P/A)
0 260/370 39/57 510/500 26/62
1 270/700 40/120 510/560 27/200
2 1300/750 210/120 670/550 410/210
3 1700/970 230/150 660/610 470/300
4.5 (bottom) 1400/1500 190/230 620/720 370/530
Source: Nutrient sampling conducted by John Kane (DPI Warrnambool) and Worldwide Organics Pty Ltd at the Terang
Demo Dairy (2003).
*P = prior to agitation; A = after agitation.
The nutrient concentrations in the first pond increased with depth for N, P and S but did not for K. Agitating (stirring) the
pond did have an effect on mixing nutrients throughout the pond. Basing your application rate on the nutrient
concentration at the top of the pond could mean that you will be out by a factor of over threefold if you use effluent from the
bottom. You may be applying excessive amounts of nutrients to some areas and be at risk of burning crops and
seedlings. Therefore, when emptying a first pond that has been collecting nutrients for a number of years, it is
recommended that this effluent be applied to an established pasture or to paddocks prior to cultivation (in other words,
apply it before sowing a new crop or pasture).
There was no nutrient gradient at depth with the second (storage) pond at DemoDAIRY, which means that taking a
sample at any level in a second pond will give an accurate result.
13.2.3 Salts
The relatively high levels of electrical conductivity (a measure of total salts) shown in Tables 13.2, 13.3 and 13.4 are
possibly due to potassium, rather than to sodium. Potassium is less likely than sodium to cause a salinity problem in
pastures. However, if your wash down water itself has a high level of electrical conductivity (for example, some bore
water), then a high level of electrical conductivity in the effluent may mean a high level of sodium.
If the effluent contains a high proportion of sodium compared to calcium and magnesium (a relationship called the
sodium adsorption ratio, or SAR), continued application of effluent on the same area may eventually increase the
proportion of sodium cations adsorbed by the clay particles. If the ratio is above 6 (generally speaking), it is of concern
and can increase dispersion of some soils and consequently affect soil structure. In other words, applying effluent with a
sodium adsorption ratio above 6 has the opposite effect to applying gypsum.
The average SAR for the sampled dairy effluent ponds ranged from 2.6 to 4.6 (see Tables 13.2 to 13.4), which is below
the level of concern of about 6. However, some ponds had SAR levels above 6 (see the ranges for SAR in Tables 13.2 to
13.4). Such effluent should not be applied to pastures in excessive amounts; or alternatively, it should be well-diluted
before application.
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 5/9
13.3 Sampling and testing of effluent ponds
Sampling the storage pond prior to the first application of effluent is recommended, followed by monitoring of the area to
which the effluent was applied using soil tests. It is also recommended to sample the first (anaerobic) pond before
emptying (in other words, every 4 to 7 years), although nutrients at depth will vary.
13.3.1 Procedure for sampling
Sample source
As with soil testing, the key to effluent sampling is to take a sample that will represent the effluent being applied to the
pasture or crop. In many cases, it would be more appropriate to collect samples from the final pond, the gate valves or
even from the pump.
Direct application systems are best sampled at the sump or pump.
Farmers who use flood irrigation would sample at the gate valve, as this is the easiest place to test (allow the pump or
gate valve to flow for at least 10 minutes before sample collection).
If you intend to desludge the pond, take samples from the sludge layer of the pond. As indicated in Table 13.6, the levels
of nutrients at the bottom of the pond will be higher than the liquid fraction at the top of the first pond. If you are pumping
off the liquid fraction of the first pond, take samples from that part of the pond. It would be best to take a sample when the
first pond is being stirred. It is, however, unlikely that the pond will be stirred by a contractor, sampled and then stirred
again and applied after the results of the test have arrived. If you are pumping from a second or storage pond, the nutrient
gradient is relatively constant, so sampling depth is not critical.
Equipment required for sampling
You will need the following equipment for sampling:
A pole with a clamp at one end to hold a sample bottle.
A plastic bucket.
Three or four 1-litre, water-washed sample bottles.
Insulated carrier boxes.
Crushed ice.
Procedure
Collect 250- to 500-mL samples from various sites around the final pond or from the pump or pipe outlet, using the
sample bottle clamped to the pole until 3 to 4 litres have been collected. Collection from ponds should take place close to
the surface but should exclude any crust material.
As each sample is collected, place it in the plastic bucket. Hands and foreign objects should not contact sampled effluent
or the inside of the bucket.
Each 1-litre, water-washed sample bottle should be filled to the brim with thoroughly mixed effluent from the bucket,
unless the sample will be frozen prior to sending it to the laboratory, in which case, leave enough space below the top of
the bottle to allow for expansion.
If samples are refrigerated, ensure they reach the laboratory within 2 days of sampling. If samples are frozen, 7 days is
acceptable. To prevent unnecessary waiting and sample spoiling, the laboratory should be notified that the samples are
being sent.
Note: Effluent ponds can be very deep, with steep internal walls. It may even be difficult to locate the edge of the pond due
to plant growth. Any work, including effluent sampling, done in the vicinity of the pond should be conducted with extreme
caution.
13.3.2 Testing laboratories
Laboratories in Victoria that do effluent analyses include:
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 6/9
Water Ecoscience Pty Ltd, 68 Ricketts Road, Mount Waverley 3149; telephone 9550 1000; fax 9543 7372.
SGS Environmental Services (Scientific & Environmental Services),
PO Box 1956 (Hazelwood Road), Traralgon 3844; telephone 5172 1555; fax 5174 9320.
Deakin University Water Quality Laboratory, Deakin University,
PO Box 423 Warrnambool 3280, telephone 55633481; fax 5633462.
Ellinbank Water Laboratory, Department of Primary Industries,
RMB 2460 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank 3821; telephone 5624 2222; fax 5624 2200.
Tests that should be considered include:
pH (water).
Electrical conductivity (in other words, salinity).
Calcium as Ca.
Sodium as Na.
Potassium as K.
Nitrogen as total N.
Phosphorus as total P.
This group of tests provides a good assessment of the useful nutrients for pastures and also identifies potentially
detrimental constituents, such as sodium and other salts.
13.4 Methods of applying dairy shed effluent to pastures and crops
Eventually, all dairy effluent systems will need to have the ability to apply effluent to land. A well-designed dairy effluent
collection and storage system is essential for the effective use of dairy effluent on farm. An effective effluent system also
enhances the control and distribution of valuable nutrients back to sections of the farm that require them.
13.4.1 Options for applying effluent
The two main options for managing dairy effluent, whether from a dairy shed or a feedpad facility, are:
Direct application: This option collects effluent at a single collection point, and then transports it via pipes or channels to
a suitable area on the farm. Effluent can be applied to pastures and crops using a number of options, such as direct
discharge, flood irrigation channels, fixed sprays, travelling irrigators and slurry tankers.
As this option relies on daily application, effluent needs to be managed so that it is retained on the property and so that
plants and soil absorb the nutrients. Farms with well-drained soil types that suit direct application also pump from
sumps year round.
Storage prior to application: This option allows effluent to be collected from more than one collection point and directed
to an effluent storage pond. It provides much more control over runoff, and effluent applications can be timed to meet
plant nutrient and water requirements and to fit labour availability, rather than having to apply effluent on a daily basis,
even when it is raining.
On irrigation farms, the effluent pond should be located near a main farm channel to maximise the irrigated area onto
which the effluent can be spread. If farm channels are used as part of the distribution system with either option, only
discharge dairy effluent into a farm channel in which water is flowing. This will avoid a build up of waste material and
weed growth, which would interfere with the operation of the channel.
Note: Salinity and nutrient toxicity problems can result where effluent is spread over an area of pasture that is too small.
13.4.2 Options for applying effluent pond sludge
Numerous types of machinery are available specifically for handling solids from the pond sludge and applying them to
pastures, including slurry tankers, belt spreaders, muck runners, loaders, scrapers and laser buckets.
This is an opportunity to specifically target paddocks that are lacking in nutrients or have poor topsoils.
A common practise in the Northern Irrigation and Macalister regions is to apply solids to newly lasered bays to help
establish topsoil structure with effluent high in organic matter.
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 7/9
In dryland farming, it is recommended that sludge be applied to paddocks that are going to be cultivated for cropping.
13.4.3 Underlying principles of application
Irrespective of which system is used, a number of key principles need to be followed to return effluent and its nutrients
back to pastures or crops effectively. These principles are:
Ensure effluent and its nutrients are distributed over a large area. The effluent should be tested to work out the
required application rate.
Irrigate paddocks where there is no likelihood of runoff from the property.
Conduct regular soil testing of the areas to which effluent is being applied to monitor nutrient levels.
Rotate applications around three or four areas so that you avoid nutrient overloading.
Be conscious of animal health issues when applying effluent to paddocks that will be grazed.
Maintain machinery and equipment.
Have contingency plans for breakdowns.
13.5 How much effluent should I apply to pastures or crops?
The average results from Tables 13.2 to 13.4 give us an indication of how much effluent can be applied to improve
pasture and crop growth.
Many waste ponds have a capacity of 1000 cubic metres of water, which is the same as 1 megalitre (ML). Using figures
from south-west Victoria (Table 13.2), the average nutrient contents per ML of effluent were:
192 kg nitrogen.
47 kg phosphorus.
358 kg potassium.
Using these figures, 192 kg N/ha, 47 kg P/ha and 358 kg K/ha would be applied for every megalitre of effluent applied per
hectare. You can see this is a high rate of applied nutrients.
One ML of effluent applied to 1 ha is the same as 100 mm of rainfall or irrigation per ha. So this rate also applies a lot of
water.
Using these figures, applying the effluent at a rate of 1 ML per 4 ha (25 mm or 0.25 ML/ha) will put on around 48 kg N/ha,
12 kg P/ha and 90 kg K/ha.
This is close to the maximum nitrogen to apply in a single dressing, a fair level of phosphorus (equivalent to about 140 kg
of single superphosphate/ha) and quite a high level of potassium. Preferably, the annual potassium application rate
should be less than 120 kg K/ha. High rates of K may cause an imbalance of calcium and magnesium in pastures (see
‘Exchangeable potassium’ in Section 8.1.8), which can lead to milk fever and grass tetany, especially around calving.
Therefore, using these figures, a single application of dairy effluent at a rate of about 25 mm or 0.25 ML/ha will not apply
excess nutrients. This application rate should also reduce the risk of effluent runoff and of nitrates leaching to ground
water. At this application rate, one to three applications can be made per year, preferably at times when the pasture is
actively growing and able to use the nutrients and water. Nutrient levels in dairy shed effluent vary greatly, and it is best to
test the effluent you will be using on your farm.
Following from the above, every megalitre should irrigate about 4 ha per irrigation. If the crop or pasture is to be
irrigated more than once in a year, then the following points need to be considered:
Normal fertiliser applications should be altered (in the case of potassium, eliminated) on the paddocks to which
effluent is applied.
Timing of applications.
Withholding periods.
Grazing management of effluent-treated areas.
Remember that the figures used above are based on the average nutrient content of pond effluent for one region. The
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 8/9
nutrient content of individual effluent pond varies widely. Thus, the amount of effluent to be applied will also vary widely. If
you want to use effluent on your pastures or crops, it is strongly suggested that you have the effluent tested so you can
work out the actual nutrient application rates for your farm. Monitor the results by regular soil testing of the areas to which
effluent has been applied. The money you spend on testing may well be saved in reduced fertiliser applications or by
avoiding a problem with nitrates leaching to ground water, high potassium levels, salinity or high sodium levels.
13.6 Where should dairy effluent be applied?
Applying effluent to the same area each year can lead to overloading with some nutrients, such as K. Care also needs to
be taken with salts that may be contained in the effluent. So, unless you regularly test your effluent and test the soil where
it is applied, it is recommended that you rotate your applications around three or four areas so that you avoid nutrient
overloading. In the example of 1 ML applied to 4 hectares, you could have three or four 4-hectare areas on which the
effluent is applied one to three times per year.
Generally, areas of application may include pastures with nutrient deficiencies, newly lasered irrigation bays, pastures
linked to on-farm drainage (such as irrigation reuse dams) or paddocks further away from the dairy. Application of effluent
to calf-rearing paddocks or paddocks used to calve down the herd should be avoided (see Section 13.8 for animal health
implications). Results from research trials in south-west Victoria are showing encouraging results from application of
effluent to fodder crops (turnips and millet) and silage regrowth. See the articles ‘Using dairy effluent to boost turnip
yields can pay’ and ‘Effluent Returns Dollars – 3 Years Of Trials Show’ in Appendix E for further information on effluent
rates and crop responses. A full-scale effluent trial is also under way to further explore the economics of effluent
application to crops.
13.7 When is the best time to apply effluent?
Effluent from your storage pond (or your second pond, if you have a two-pond system) should be applied in the drier
months of summer and autumn. Applying effluent during the wetter months increases the risk of runoff to streams or
leaching to ground water when soils are saturated.
Apply effluent when pasture or crops are actively growing so that they can use the nutrients. With pastures, applications
are timed to follow a grazing event to ensure pastures are palatable in the next rotation. To avoid problems with nitrate
levels, especially with a slurry application, stock should be kept off the area for a minimum of 3 weeks.
An important point to remember when managing effluent is that storage ponds must be emptied prior to the
recommended storage period to ensure ponds have adequate holding capacity for effluent water generated over that
period. In southern Victoria, the end of spring (say, December) and then soon after the autumn break are ideal times for
applying effluent. Quite often, a single irrigation onto a fodder crop at this time of the year will significantly improve yields.
In irrigation areas, the water from the effluent system should be used regularly through the irrigation season and timed to
coincide with the last irrigation.
13.8 Animal health considerations when using dairy effluent or sludge as
fertiliser
Bacteria that cause diseases, such as Johne’s disease, salmonellosis, leptospirosis, mastitis and enzootic bovine
leucosis, can be found in manure, urine and milk. Worm eggs, coccidial eggs, clostridium organisms and tetanus
spores are also passed in manure. However, in most cases, the period of time before application to pasture and the
dilution effect of the washdown water tend to reduce the risk to stock that graze paddocks that have been treated with
waste water.
To further reduce the risk to animal health, the following precautions should be taken:
Do not allow young stock (less than 12 months old) to graze or have access to treated areas.
Do not allow drains from treated areas to flow into areas where young stock are being kept. (This will help to
reduce the risk of infection with Johne’s disease.)
During summer, do not graze areas to which effluent has been applied for at least 2 weeks. If you can safely apply
effluent in the winter, do not graze treated areas for at least 3 weeks.
13/03/2013 Using dairy effluent as a fertiliser - Department of Primary Industries
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/fertilising-dairy-pastures/chapter-13 9/9
Do graze areas just prior to effluent application to allow increased sunlight penetration to kill organisms and to
extend the period before the area is ready to be regrazed.
Do spread effluent during the warmer, drier months to reduce survival chances of disease organisms.
Contact your veterinarian if you have concerns about any specific animal health problems associated with applying dairy
shed wastes to pastures or crops.
13.9 Summary
Dairy shed effluent must not leave the farm via waterways or ground water.
Approximately 8% to 10% of the daily dung and urine is deposited in the dairy yard and laneways.
Dairy shed effluent from a 100-cow herd over one lactation contains approximately 50 kg P, 250 kg N, and 270 kg
K.
Nutrient levels in dairy shed effluent vary greatly, and it is best to test the effluent you will be using on your farm.
Apply effluent in summer and autumn when crops and pastures are actively growing and ground water is not close
to the ground surface.
Follow sensible management strategies to minimise animal health issues.
The Department of Primary Industries provides advice on how to manage dairy effluent and also provides effluent
and feedpad system designs. Refer to Section 13.4.3 for contact details.