29 2D ·2009 3
pp. 235~244
Follow-up VE
Consecutive Design VE Process Emphasized on Follow-up Activities
*·**
·····························································································································································································································
Abstract
Design Value Engineering (VE) has become an import part of the daily design process since it has been introduced in the construction industry. Design VE is usually conducted in the general and execution design stages respectively. In order to increase the effectiveness of the VE process, the outcome from the general design VE activities should be integrated into exe- cution design. The outcome from the execution design should be used again for construction. In this study, a consecutive VE process model has been presented as a way to improve the current practice of design VE activities in the construction industry. In the presented model, follow-up activities are emphasized to increase values from the life-cycle perspective of a construction project. The model was tested in a case study of an actual design VE process. The result of the study demonstrates that the model can: 1) effectively incorporate owners requirements; 2) assist decision making in selecting better construction; 3) increase the interface between general and execution design stages; and 4) trace the value flow more efficiently. Overall, the study results indicates that a the consecutive VE process model can be effectively applied when construction project are con- tracted for the life-cycle management of construction projects.
Keywords : Design Value Engineering (VE), follow-up activities, decision making, interface, life-cycle
·····························································································································································································································

VE , . VE . VE VE . VE VE . Follow-up() VE . VE . VE , ; , VE ; , ; , . VE VE .
·····························································································································································································································
2006 1 100
(VE)
. VE
,
. VE (CM)
,
. VE
VE
. VE
VE
. , VE

. VE
VE
.
*· · (E-mail : vepro@pusan.ac.kr) **·· · (E-mail : sngwmoon@pusan.ac.kr)
1) (2005), “ (MOCT News Release).”
− 236 −
VE
Follow-up2) VE
.
VE VE
.
1) VE , ,
.
VE .
.
5) VE
.
2.1 VE
. 1
VE , VE

.
.
VE 2,
1 , 100
. ,
VE VE
. VE
VE
. 1
(DOD), (WSDOT) Job
Audit Phase . VE
.
VE VE
.
VE VE
.
2.2 VE
” , 2 VE
, , 3
.
.
2) (VE Workshop) : ,
, VE , VE , ,
, VE . 2) Follow-up “VE ” .
1. LCC VE
1. Job-Plan

(DOD)
Speculation
Speculative/Creative Phase
Development/ Recommendation Phase
Report Phase
Speculation Phase
Evaluation Phase
Development Phase
Presentation Phase
3) : VE
.
.
VE
,
3 VE
.
VE
4
.
VE DB
.
,
(CM) VE
VE
.
VE VE
VE
.
5 VE 12
.
.

.
.
CM VE

. VE

.

(VE Workshop)
VE VE
VE , ,
VE
3) (2006), QFD ASIT VE , .
3. VE 3)
VE
1 , “ VE ”, (2001)
2 , , “ VE ,” (2000) , ,
3 , , , “ VE ”, (2005)
4 , , “(QFD) VE ”, (2005)

5 , “ VE ”, 19 2(2003)
6 , “ VE FAST FAST ”, (2001)
7 , QFD ASIT VE , (2006) ,
4. VE
VE
1 J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, “Comparative Study of Idea Generation between Traditional Value Management Workshops and GDSS-Supported Workshops”(ASCE, 2007)
2 J. Mgmt. in Engrg, “Dynamic Knowledge Creation through Value Management Teams”(ASCE, 2007)
3 J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, “Critical Success Factors for Value Management Studies in Construction” (ASCE, 2003)
4 J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg, “Computerized System for Application of Value Engineering Methodology” (ASCE, 2000)
5 Advantages of Web-Technology Supported VM for Consensus Making(ASCE, 2000)
5.

1 (CM) : ,
3
3 :
VE 7
VE
.
VE CM
.
VE
.
3) VE
VE
VE
. VE

. VE VE
.
VE
VE

. VE
.
3. VE
3.1
.
VE VE
. 3
VE (KPI)
VE
.
VE VE
VE .
VE (Output)
.

, , ,
.
VE VE

.

.




. , ,
VE .
VE
,
3.
4. VE
29 2D · 2009 3 − 239 −
.
VE
VE
.
VE 6 VE

. VE

.
(A)
VE

. (D)
VE
.
VE
. VE

.
.
1) (A) : . 5
VE
.
5 .
3) (D) : , VE , VE
, .
4) (F) : VE
.
(1) .
(%) =
(1)
. VE
(F) .
(F) 75%~100% :
(F) 60%~74% :
(F) 59% :
4.
4.1
.
1 2008 11 500
, 2 2011 3 200
,
. 50,000(165,000m), 32,000
(105,564m), 700(
(Fast Track)
(CM) .
VE
, ,
, VE
.
.
.


2) VE
.
, VE
.
. VE
, VE
(Cost − VE Cost) ×100

(A)
(B)
(D)
− 240 −
.
VE
, .
4.2.1 1 :
, ,
.
VE 1
. 2

.

, 5 .
4.2.2 2 3 :
2 3
VE
. , ,
, VE
. 7 , ,
.
VE
. 65%,
83%, 0%
57.8% .
4.2.4 4 : VE
4 VE
8 11 .
. 5.
8.

(A)
(B)
(D)
VE (E)=(D/5) ×100%
(F)=(E-C)
(G)

VE


5 2 40% ( →) 4 80% 40% 25%


4 2 40% 4 80% 40%
VE

4 2 40% (/ ) 3 60% 20% 88%
√
4 80% 40% 86%


5 3 60% 4 80% 20% VE √

4 80% 60% VE



· ·SL · Slab ·Deck Slab
4

·, ·1 ·1, 2 3,4 : , , · :
23

· · · Back Fill
9
(1) (A) : /
(F) 5
4~5 .
(2) (B) : 5
5 1 2
.
(3) (C) : 20% 40%
VE .
(4) (D) :
VE
4~5 .
(5) VE(E) : 80%~100%
.
(6) (F) : VE
9.

(A)
(B)
(D)
VE (E)=(D/5) ×100%

4 2 40% (→) 5 100% 60% 7.3%


5 2 40% 4 80% 40% 30%


4 1 20% 5 100% 80% VE

3 2 40% 3 60% 20%
VE
10.

(A)
(B)
(D)
VE (E)=(D/5) ×100%
4 80% 20% 100%


5 2 40% 4 80% 40% 65%


4 80% 20% 61%

²
4 3 60% (→) 4 80% 20%
VE
4 80% 20% 100%


5 2 40% 4 80% 40% 65%

− 242 −
(7) (G) :
VE Cost
7.3% 30% .
(8) : (F) (G)
1
.
(9) VE :
1
VE .
6 VE
(F)
VE
.
6
2 .

VE , ,
7 4
(F) .
5
1 .

8 3
(F) .
3
2 .
VE

9 6 (F)
.

(A)
(B)
(D)
VE (E)=(D/5) ×100%
(F)=(E-C)
(G)

VE


4 2 40% 4 80% 40% 62%

4 2 40%
4 80% 40%
VE

3 1 20% GPS TYPE
3 60% 40% 100%


4 2 40% 4 80% 40% 100%


4 2 40% 4 80% 40% 62%

4 2 40%
4 80% 40%
VE
7. VE
29 2D · 2009 3 − 243 −
4)
4
.

10 5 (F)
.
VE 12
12, 95 .
VE 99 , 57.8%
100% . ,


.
13
,
, VE
.
5.

. ,
(CM) VE
VE
. VE

.
VE
VE .

.
2. VE

4.
VE
.
VE
,
.
8. VE
9. VE
10. VE
12. VE VE

VE
VE
VE
VE
VE
VE
5 12 3 95 57.8% 100%
13.

VE VE
VE ( (F) ) VE
VE VE
VE
VE
VE ()
VE VE 57.8%
VE 100%
VE
VE
− 244 −
(2000) VE , .
(2006) QFD ASIT VE , , .
Brais, R., Norton & W. C., and McElligott (1995) Value Manage- ment in Construction, MacMillan.
Dell'Isola, Alphonse J. (1997) Value Engineering : Practical Appli-
cation for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Operation, R.S.Means Company Inc.
http://www.asce.org/( ) http://www.defenselink.mil/( ) http://www.dot.ca.gov/( ) http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/veabout.cfm( ) http://www.gsa.gov/( ) http://www.value-eng.org( SAVE International) http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/( )
(: 2008.9.1/: 2009.1.9/: 2009.1.28)