1
12/18/2016
FORENSIC SURVEYING
BERNARD M. TELATOVICH, P.E., ESQ., M.Eng.
JANUARY 2017
FORENSIC SURVEYING
BERNARD M. TELATOVICH, P.E., ESQ.
CONSULTING SERVICES & INVESTIGATIONS, LLCBENCHMARK CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES
NYSAPLS January 2017
What is Forensic Surveying?
FORENSICS+
SURVEYING
FORENSIC SURVEYING
Forensic + SurveyingDefinitions
• Forensics - the application of a broad spectrum of sciences to answer questions of interest to the legal system.
Forensics
What thoughts come to your mind?
Forensic Fields• Forensic Accounting• Aircraft Failure• Forensic Anthropology• Forensic Animation• Forensic Archeologist• Forensic Art• Forensic Ballistics • Forensic Biology• Forensic Botany• Biomechanical Engineering• Canine Forensics• Forensic Chemistry• Conspicuity• Coroner • Computer Forensics• Crime Scene Forensics• Forensic Dentistry• Forensic Dermatology• Document Authenticator• Food Scientist• Forensic DNA • Forensic Emergency Med
Forensic EngineeringForensic EntomologyForensic EvidenceExplosivesForestry Fire InvestigationForensic GeneologyGeneticsForensic GeologyHandwriting HermiticityHistoryHuman FactorsForensic HydologyForensic HypnosisForensic LinguistLatent Print IdentificationMalpracticeMaterialsMedical TranscriptionMoldForensic NursingForensic OdontologyForensic OthomologyPathologyForensic PalynologyForensic Pharmacist
Forensic PhotographyForensic Psychiatry Forensic PsychologyForensic Reconstruction/A-RForensic Social WorkForensic Science-Hair & Fibers Forensic Science – FirearmsSafety EngineeringForensic SculpturesSoil ScienceForensic Serology-Bloodstains/PatternStructural FailureForensic Surveying Forensic TaphonomyForensic Technology ToxicologyVisual AcuityDendroecology
2
12/18/2016
Forensic + SurveyingDefinitions
• Surveying – the science or scientific method of making surveys of land.
Forensic Surveying
• Forensic Surveying – the application of (principles of) surveying to answer questions of interest to the legal system.
• So who can practice as a forensic surveying expert?
What is a Forensic Surveyor/Expert Witness?
An expert (according to Blacks Law Dictionary) is an individual who is knowledgeable in specialized field, that knowledge being obtained from either education or personal experience.
Eight Pillars of Trust
TRUST ----The word speaks for itself- can’t be overemphasized in all sectors
Eight Pillars of Trust
Clarity (distrust for ambiguity)
Compassion – The power of caring
Character – Do what needs to be done-Do the right thing
Competence – Stay fresh – stay on top of it!
Eight Pillars of Trust
Commitment – never a lying apologizer
Connections – Repelling? Magnetic? Dynamic?
Contribution- Deliver Results – give 100%
Consistency – builds trust, builds your brand, builds reputation, builds leadership
3
12/18/2016
What is a Forensic Surveyor/Expert Witness?
Possessing a professional license is NOT(typically) needed to be considered and qualified as an expert, but it goes towards the credibility of the witness.
Laws that regulate the licensed practice of surveying exist in every state, but do not prohibit the court from considering the surveyor an expert. (Exception may be New Mexico)
Forensic Surveyor/Expert Witness
A licensed surveyor can clarify and add credibility to a court case about aspects of:
1. An industrial accident,
2. an automobile accident,
3. property line dispute, 4. criminal matters,
5. professional malpractice matters, and
6. many other types of cases that arise.
Examples from the audience?
Forensic Surveyor/Expert Witness
NEED:
Surveyors who build reputations in the forensics field and serve as expert witnesses are in high demand. In addition, the pay is typically pretty good too. It is rare that practicing as an expert will be a surveyors sole area of practice.
Forensic Surveyor/Expert Witness
Required Knowledge:
1. Expertise in the area of practice.2. Knowledge about many legal principles.3. Communication Skills.4. Information gathering skills.5. Sleuth (in some matters.)
Forensic Surveyor/Expert Witness
Use of Data:
The data this specialist collects, analyzes, and maps is typically included as evidence at a trial, hearing, or lawsuit. As in all court cases, all parties carefully scrutinize evidence, especially opposing counsel. Opposing council often hires their own forensic surveyor to contradict the surveying evidence.
Forensic Surveyor/Expert Witness
Critical Skills:
It takes a great deal of precision to do forensic surveying. In addition, professionals who want to specialize in forensic surveying or serve as expert witnesses must be good communicators. They have to convey technical information in a way that people who do not have a background in surveying can easily understand in order to make decisions.
4
12/18/2016
Forensic Expert Skills
Technical competency along with superior communication skills are essential for the successful practice of Forensic Surveying.
- TECHNICAL SKILLS- REPORT WRITING- TESTIMONY
What might be of “interest” to the Legal System
• DEP wants my property!• Where is my property line?
.Do you remember me?Skippy is run over by the undercover police
car.
Do you think there will be a lawsuit?
What information would the attorney need?
What can you do as a surveyor to assist?
The Lawsuit
Venue – Court -Jurisdiction
Plaintiff Vs. Defendant
The Lawsuit
Venue – Court -Jurisdiction
Plaintiff Vs. Defendant
• The filing of a lawsuit
COMPLAINT
• Responding to the Complaint
ANSWER
DEFENSES
NEW MATTER
The Lawsuit• PLEADINGS and MOTIONS
• Complaint and Answer
• Counterclaim
• Cross Claim
• Joinder
• Interpleader
• Impleader
• Intervenor
The Lawsuit•MOTIONS
• Motion to Amend Pleadings
• Motion in Limine
• Motion for Summary Judgment
• Motion to Strike
• Motion for a Curative Instruction
• Motion for a Directed Verdict
• Motion to Dismiss
• Motion for Leave to Reopen a Case
• Motion for a Misttrial
5
12/18/2016
The Lawsuit• Jury Trial
• Recuse a Judge
• Disqualify Counsel
• Jury Selection Examination
• Strike Juror for Cause
• Sequester Witnesses
• Adjournment
• Limit Witness Testimony
• Exclude Testimony
• Exclude Exhibits
• Receive Testimony• Receive Exhibits• Judicial Notice• Instruct Jury• Sequester Jury• Discharge Jury• Poll Jury• Stop making any more motions• Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (J.N.O.V.)• New Trial• Amended findings of Fact• Enforce Judgment• Attorney’s Fees
MOT IONS
The Lawsuit• DISCOVERY –
PRE TRIAL PROCEDURES
• Depositions
• Interrogatories
• Request for Admissions
The Lawsuit• TYPICALLY MOST CASES DO NOT PROCEED PAST THE POINT OF DISCOVERY AND PRE TRIAL PROCEDURES.
•95% OR MORE OF THE CASES ARE EITHER THROWN OUT AT THIS POINT OR SETTLED.
•
The Lawsuit
Venue – Court -Jurisdiction
Plaintiff Vs. Defendant
TRIAL PHASE
The Law and LawsuitVenue – Court -Jurisdiction
Plaintiff Vs. Defendant
Motions
Evidentiary Objections
Jury Selection
Opening Statements
PLAINTIFF”S CASE in CHIEF Direct examination
Cross ExaminationDefendant
TRIAL PHASEDEFENDANT”S CASE in CHIEF – Direct examination Cross Examination Plaintiff
Summation - Closing
Verdict
Appeal – Appeals- More Appeals
Where does the Surveyor fit in?
• Plaintiff
• Defendant
• Fact Witness
• Expert Witness
6
12/18/2016
Where does the Surveyor fit in?
• Expert Witness
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl92bHtrOvA
Where does the Surveyor fit in?
• Expert Witness
Surveying in the Legal Forum!Forensic SurveyorExpert Surveyor
• What would qualify me as an Expert?
State Rules of Evidence (New Mexico)MOST JURISDICTIONS ARE SIMILAR
A person holding themselves out as a Forensic Surveyor (a/k/a an expert) must have the requisite training, experience and/or expertise in order to qualify an expert in a court of law. Rule 11-702 of the New Mexico Judicial Volume 11, Article 7, outlines “Opinions and Expert.”
Alabama Rule 702
• Testimony by experts.
• If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.
NEW YORK
• Admissibility of expert testimony in New York is governed by N.Y. C.P.L.R § 4515. It provides: – Unless the court orders otherwise, questions
calling for the opinion of an expert witness need not be hypothetical in form, and the witness may state his opinion and reasons without first specifying the data upon which it is based. Upon cross-examination, he may be required to specify the data and other criteria supporting the opinion.
NEW YORK
The Purpose of Expert Testimony --aid the fact finder in those circumstances when the expert’s testimony “would help to clarify an issue calling for professional or technical knowledge, possessed by the expert and beyond the ken of the typical juror.”
De Long v. County of Erie, 60 N.Y.2d 296, 307 (1983); see also Price v. New York City Housing Auth., 92 N.Y.2d 553 (1998); Weiner v. Lenox Hill Hosp., 88 N.Y.2d 784 (1996); Selkowitz v. County of Nassau, 45 N.Y.2d 97 (1978
7
12/18/2016
NEW YORK
When would Expert Testimony not be necessary?
--Expert testimony is unnecessary unless it aids the jury in examining an issue which requires professional or technical knowledge.
Kambat v. St. Francis Hosp., 89 N.Y.2d 489 (1997); Galasso v. 400 Exec. Blvd., LLC, 101 A.D.3d 677 (2d Dep’t 2012)
NEW YORKWhat Qualifies one as an expert? -- must have the appropriate education, background, and/or experience in the field upon which he or she will opine. “The expert should be possessed of the requisite skill, training, education, knowledge or experience from which it can be assumed that the information imparted or the opinion rendered is reliable.”
Matott v. Ward, 48 N.Y.2d 455 (1979)
NEW YORKWhat determines whether the testimony of an
expert is admissible?
-- within the discretion of the trial judge whether to permit the proposed expert to give his or her opinion as to an issue in the action.
Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hosp., 285 N.Y. 389, 398; Guzman ex rel. Jones v. 4030 Bronx Blvd. Associates L.L.C., 54 A.D.3d 42 (1 Dep’t 2008).
NEW YORKWhat can an expert rely upon when making
an opinion in court?
-- (1) facts which are in the record or may be fairly inferred from the record, and (2) facts that are personally known to the expert.
Hambsch v. New York City Transit Auth., 63 N.Y.2d 723 (1984); Stringile v. Rothman, 142 A.D.2d 637 (1988). In general, an expert may not rely upon hearsay in rendering an opinion.
South Carolina Rule 702
Testimony by experts.
Is Identical to the Federal Rule of Evidence?
Surveying in the Legal Forum!Forensic SurveyorExpert Surveyor
• What would qualify me as an Expert?
• Lets look at other states:Rule 11-702. Testimony by Experts
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge beyond that possessed by a layperson will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence and determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an
opinion or otherwise.”
8
12/18/2016
Surveying in the Legal Forum!Forensic SurveyorExpert Surveyor
TWO TERMS:
Frye
Daubert
Surveying in the Legal Forum!Forensic SurveyorExpert Surveyor
• Basis of opinions by Experts:
• Rule 703 Basis of Opinion Testimony by Experts:
• Identical to language in FRE 703 in 2000.
• Balance between – need for an expert and the attempt to bring in inadmissible evidence.
Surveying in the Legal Forum!Forensic SurveyorExpert Surveyor
• Rule 703 Basis of opinion Testimony by Experts:
The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.
Surveying in the Legal Forum!Forensic SurveyorExpert Surveyor
• Rule 11-703 Basis of opinion Testimony by Experts:The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence in order for the opinion or inference to be admitted. Facts or data that are otherwise inadmissible shall not be disclosed to the jury by the proponent of the opinion or inference unless the court determines that their probative value in assisting the jury to evaluate the expert's opinion substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect.
Motion to Preclude an Experts Testimony
A motion in limine may be put forth by the opposing attorney in an effort to preclude the expert from testifying about any or all of the opinions in his report or as he will purportedly testify about. This is not a motion regarding qualifications, but about the “Opinions.”
Fyre/DaubertChicken or Comedy?
“ I have heard a lot about Frye and Dauber hearings. What do they mean to me? Should I be concerned? How do I avoid this unpleasant hearing?”
9
12/18/2016
New Mexico and Tennessee (Most states and the Federal system)
follow Daubert?Dating back to 1923, the “Frye Test” has been considered the “general acceptance ” test for admissibility of scientific evidence. However, in New Mexico and Tennessee state courts follow “Daubert” which is the standard established by the United States Supreme Court in 1993. The Daubert case allows the judge to act as “gatekeeper” in determining admissibility of the opinions and testimony of an expert.
Do New Jersey, Maryland and Pennsylvania follow Daubert?
These states, along with some others, are in the minority and still utilize the “Frye Test” or the “general acceptance ” test for admissibility of scientific evidence.
(LETS READ FRYE)
NO
What about New York? Alternate Dispute Resolution
• ADRProcedures for settling disputes by means
other than litigation; e.g., by Arbitration, mediation, or minitrials.
Advantages of ADRs:� less costly than trials and litigation, and � more expeditious than litigation.
BINDING or NON-BINDING
Why ADR? ADR GOAL- RESOLVE
10
12/18/2016
WHAT WOULD LINCOLN SAY? Why ADR?
ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
• ARBITRATION?
What is Arbitration?
The submission of a dispute to an unbiased third person designated by the parties to the controversy, who agree in advance to comply with the award—a decision to be issued after a hearing at which both parties have an opportunity to be heard.
ADR Process
ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
• MEDIATION
What is Meditation?
A settlement of a dispute or controversy by setting up an independent person between two contending parties in order to aid them in the settlement of their disagreement
MEDIATION
11
12/18/2016
MEDIATION
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS
OF
MEDIATION
MEDIATION
NOT JEFF LUCAS’ TEN COMMANDMENTS
SOURCE: Louis C. Schmidt, Jr, THE PENNSYLVANIA LAWYER, The 10 Commandments of Mediation, May/June 2015s
1st COMMANDMENT
THOU SHALT REMEMBER THAT MEDIATION IS NOT AN ADVERSIAL PROCESS!
Attacking the other side gets you no where.
Boasting about how correct or strong your position is gets you no where.
Show respect to everyone’s job, position, and circumstances.
2nd COMMANDMENT
THOU SHALT HAVE AN OPENING STATEMENT!
Attorney and party’s opportunity to talk to the mediator AND the opposing side.
Experts participate in preparing the statement and providing technical advice to the attorney.
This is the chance to make a first impression. All involved, including the parties, may want to make an opening statement. Expert should work with attorney on his/her part.
3rd COMMANDMENT
THOU SHALT SHOW RESPECT!
Respect the process.
Treat everyone involved with respect.
Be polite! Be courteous! Be helpful.
4th COMMANDMENT
THOU SHALT BE FORTHRIGHT!
Everyone must be able to rely on what you say.
Don’t Play cards!
If you are at the bottom line—you better be.
12
12/18/2016
5th COMMANDMENT
THOU SHALT BE A LISTENER!
This is what mediation is about.
Listening enhances realization of the true interest of the involved parties.
Be a reflective listener when needed.
6th COMMANDMENT
THOU SHALT BE PREPARED!
This makes you the expert!
Know the parties positions and reasons they are taking the positions. Know where you/they would like to settle and where settlement would likely occur.
Failing to prepare as an expert is preparing to fail!
7th COMMANDMENT
THOU SHALT HAVE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY!
This allows for settlement to occur.
This is an ABSOLUTE MUST.
As an expert, do not be afraid to render your opinion on settlement, but do not become emotionally attached to you position.
8th COMMANDMENTTHOU SHALT DEMAND A MEMORANDUM
OF UNDERSTANDING!
This puts things in writing, at least the essential terms!
This avoids altered memory and buyer’s remorse.
Experts should assist in his/her role as expert, unbiased party, a third set of eyes, and to recommend as needed.
9th COMMANDMENTTHOU SHALT SUBMIT A
MEDIATION MEMORANDUM !
This puts things in writing, AGAIN, but prior to the mediation to assist the mediator.
An expert’s role is imperative in participating in the preparation of the memorandum.
This saves time--- ENOUGH SAID!
10th COMMANDMENTTHOU SHALT RESPECT CONFIDENTIALITY!
Know what must be kept confidential.
Know your code of ethics!
Know when not to say anything, even if it is not “confidential” but learned during the ADR process.
13
12/18/2016
11th COMMANDMENT
DOES ONE EXIST!
An apology and sincerity go a long way!
RULES TO FOLLOW in MEDIATION
PREPARATION – (ALL PROFESSIONALS)
A COST-BENEFIT is useful!
USE YOUR SKILLS
SPEND TIME WITH ATTORNEY-CLIENTTHE PROCESS TAKES TIME
A GOOD MEDIATOR IS A MUST
RULES TO FOLLOW in MEDIATION
CLIENT’s INTEREST are #1
LISTENING IS CRITICAL
FLEXIBILITY (not soft) PARTAKE IN ESTABLISHING CREATIVE SILUTIONS
FAILED MEDIATION may lead to SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS
PUT THE AGREEMENT IN WRITING
What kind of cases might an expert surveyor become involved?
• THE CLASSIC INVOLVING EXPERT SURVEYOR’S
• OTHER CASES
Classic Boundary Line Disputes
The Fairfax Line – 1649 Land Grant – 5,000,000 ac.
Northern Neck in Virginia
(See article by David Lee Ingram)
Mason/Dixon Line- 1632 grant – division of South
and north – PA and MD
Four Corners -- AZ, NM, CO, UT
1860s – still disputed
Nevada/Cali. Line – 600 miles of dispute
Casinos in NV or CA- legal?
Classic Boundary Line Disputes
St. George and-- disputed line for 250 years
Shelburne, VT 2007 building permit issue raised
the dispute again.
Ian Flemming (5’)- where did he pen “James Bond”
property damages 10,000 pounds
legal fees >120,000 pounds.
African wars - Danfur, Sierra Leone, Rwanda,
Nigeria
Telatovich/Mac - 20 strip behind the properties
adverse possession.
14
12/18/2016
Classic Boundary Line Disputes-States
Tennessee/NC-- disputed line for 250 years
Tennessee/GA -- 35th parallel (2008)
.�Where the missing Camak Stone stood�Tennessee Georgia Alabama Border
Bryson/Humphrey – Criminal Murder case (2009)
Classic Boundary Line Disputes-States
Georgia/South Carolina – 497 U.S. 376 (1990)
South Carolina Coastal/Lucas – 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) This case is a landmark United States Supreme Court Case involving the property line along the ocean. It involves whether there is a taking.
.
<- Savannah River ->
Classic Boundary Line Disputes
523 U.S. 767
NEW YORK v. New Jersey
Legal Principles in Boundary
Line Disputes
Letters Patent
Adverse Possession
Equity- Equitable
Riparian Rights
Navigation RightsWater Rights
PrescriptionAcquiescenceLachesCommerce ClauseEminent DomainCondemnationEasement RightsMedium Filum Acquae
Legal Principles in Boundary
Line Disputes
Non-recorded TransfersIntrafamily transfersInternational LawMaritime LawLand Grants
Survey Principles in Boundary
Line Disputes
Adverse Possession Right Angle Principles
Equity- Equitable Acreation
Riparian Rights Island RuleRatification Family Conveyances
Flood Stage Headwater-Headwater
Ordinary Water lines Principle
Emerging Islands Medium Filum Acquae
15
12/18/2016
Survey Principles in Boundary
Line Disputes
Eminent Domain – Tri-equidistantCondemnation
Acreation
Easement Lateral Seaward Boundary
Spoil Deposits/Avulsion Land Grants
Boundary Line Disputes
CASE STUDY
Classic Case StudyRapides Parish Police Jury v. Grant Parish Police Jury,
924 So.2d 357 (La.App 2006)
A dispute over the boundary line between Rapides Parish and Grant Parish in Louisiana arose in 1997. As a result, Grant Parish brought suit against Rapids Parish. While the reasons the dispute came about were not clear, the property at issue, because of the “dispute property line” involved thousands of acres. At stake would be the right to potentially millions of dollars in tax revenues (Value of case estimated at $500 Million Dollars) depending on the outcome of the case and the “location” of the dispute property line.
Case Study
CAPTION: Rapides Parish Police Jury v. Grant Parish Police Jury,
924 So.2d 357 (La.App 2006)
While, in my opinion, the holding in the case was not remarkable, what is remarkable is the time and effort the appellate court expended on the “expert surveyors,” (including an extensive amount of criticism and praise) involved in the matter.
THE CAST OF CHARACTERS!
• The Court of Appeal- Louisiana
• Opinion wrote by Chief Judge Thibodeaux
• Plaintiff-Appellant Grant Parish
• Defendant-Appellee Rapides Parish•
THE CAST OF CHARACTERS !!
Note that these are the experts mentioned in the opinion, other than surveyors. All these experts are experts hired by Rapides Parish .
•Thomas Howell Ph.D. –Historian
•Ernest Easterly -
Attorney/Geographer
•Joseph Young Ph.D. –Dendroecologist
•Lewis Peters, Ph.D. –Forester
•Paul Kemp, Ph.D. -Hydrologist
16
12/18/2016
THE CAST OF CHARACTERS II
Willis Engineering, Inc.– Frank Willis – Rapids Parish
Surveyor– Alexandria, La.
• WWW.WILLISANDCOMPANY.NET
Pan American Engineers, Inc.
- Several Surveyors (3)
- Grant Parish Surveyor (municipal)
-Alexandria, La
-WWW.PAEALEX.COM
THE CASE
PLEASE REFER TO THE CASE PROVIDED
IN THE HANDOUT MATERIALS.
However, C.J. Thibedeau was not messing around!!!!
Criticism of Pan American
1. Excluded their land survey!
2. Improperly failed to designate specific subject matter in survey for which he was responsible.
3. Failed to review certain field notes or perform closure calculations.
4. Had unexplained ambiguities and credibility problems.
5. Anomalies in survey went unexplained.
6. Expert testimony indicated that survey was not what it purported to be!
However, C.J. Thibedeau was not messing around!!!!
•• Praise of Willis
Mr. Willis is a registered professional engineer, registered professional environmental engineer, and registered land surveyor who has taught courses at LSU…his knowledge of the Red River went beyond his professional credentials…provided extensive testimony at trial and via his eighty page survey report regarding his search for legislative intent..
(Now the letdown)THE HOLDING
The court in a 41 page decision affirmed the trail court’s decision in favor of Rapids Parish. The appellate court held that the trial court properly established the boundary based upon the “LINE OF ACCEPTANCE.”
The trial court properly granted the motion in limine (Daubert hearing) to exclude the original PAE survey and accompanying testimony and exhibits, arguing improper methodology and failure to meet minimum standards….
My Opinion
The holding in this case for the Appellate Court was easy and predictable. It wasted 41 pages to affirm the findings of the trial court regarding the “Line of Acceptance.” However, the lessons learned from the forensic practitioner’s standpoint can not be forgotten. But, one should remember that the answers to the many “whys” that arise from the actions of Pan Am…are lost in the facts, not revealed, and unknown.
17
12/18/2016
My Opinion-Lessons
A forensic surveyor reviewing this matter should take away many lessons including the importance of proper methodology for surveying, retracement surveying and legal description as to the “points” relevant to identify the boundary. The problem with identifying the point described by :
“Commencing at a point on the Red river where the Daro empties into said river, and thence returning east to the point where Little river empties into Catahoula Lake;…thence down the Red River to the point of starting, the mouth of the Daro”
shows that what appears to be a simple description of a point on a Parish Boundary, turns out to be the primary issue related to the dispute over thousands of acres and millions in revenues.
Lastly, the Forensic Surveyor is exposed to the harsh realities of litigation, Daubert hearings, criticism and possibly a public assault on the credibility of a professional.
The Willis Report
• Forensic Surveyor for Rapides Parish• Report was 86 pages long.• Judge gave “kudos” to Mr. Willis.• Mr. Willis initially did not want the matter.
• Mr. Willis (and other experts for Rapides Parish) billed slightly less than ½ Million Dollars for their services.
• Grant Parish was ordered to pay the fee.
The Willis Report(The Legal Description)
The Willis Report(The disputed lines)
The Willis Report(The disputed line)
The Willis Report(The Bringhurst Map)
18
12/18/2016
The Willis Report(Elevation 36)
The Willis Report(The three lines)
The Willis Report(The man himself)
Pan American Engineers(So What Happen to Pan Am Engineers)
(All hearsay)
Still in Business. (Been around for 60 years.)On the web.Reportedly were sued for malpractice.Reportedly may have paid a nice
settlement.Reportedly one surveyor “quit” surveying.
Reportedly one surveyor was “upset” with the entire situation and no longer surveys.
CASE STUDIES CASE STUDIES
The next section of this seminar deals with various case studies While the studies are based upon certain facts from various cases, the actual fact pattern may have been modified to protect the innocent.
19
12/18/2016
Review –Two Types of Cases
• The Classic Case – The Boundary Dispute
Rapides Parish v. Grant Parish
• Other CasesInformation Gathering - AccidentsMethodology Cases – (Daubert) Record Data Rock Slides –
Failures, Etc. (The future)
Sunday 4:07 a.m.
• You are awaken by a phone call• The caller states, “There’s been a serious
accident on Route 78, two fatalities, numerous serious injuries, six vehicles involved ----- can you go gather data for us?”
• What would you do?
The Accident Scene Looks Like this!!!
•
Accident Investigation
• The Surveyor’s Role is to Document the Scene!
• What does the scene look like?• Automobile Accident
• Bridge Collapse – Minneapolis• Penn’s Landing Pier – Philadelphia• Landslide
• The Twin Towers
Legal Issues in Automobile Crashes
• Tort• Negligence• Contributory Negligence• Liability
• A preponderance of Evidence• Rules of Civil Procedure• Rules of Evidence
Automobile Accident Case Study
The components of an Automobile Accident are:
1. The Vehicles
2. The Environment/Roadway
3. The People
The Surveyor must know what information is critical to the “Investigation ”
20
12/18/2016
Automobile Accident – Case Study #1
FACTS – Vehicle one was traveling with the right of way.
Vehicle two pulled out from a stop sign.
A collision resulted – injuries.
Vehicle two brings suit against Vehicle one.
Black box results – vehicle one was exceeding the speed limit by approximately 20 mph.
Sketch of the Accident Scene !
Post-collision vehicle
positions!
DAMAGED SUV – 1ST PHOTO
DAMAGED SUV – 2nd PHOTO DAMAGED SUV – LASER SURVEY
21
12/18/2016
DAMAGED SUV – LASER SCAN TOP VIEW
DAMAGED AUTOMOBILE -1ST
PHOTO
DAMAGED AUTOMOBILE – LASER SCAN
PLEASE NOTE THE DIRECTION OF THIS TIRE!!!
DAMAGED AUTOMOBILE – LASER SCAN
TOP VIEW
VEHICLE DAMAGE PROFILES
DAMAGE PROFILE - SUV
DAMAGE PROFILE -AUTOMOBILE
VEHICLE COLLISION-FULL IMPACT
22
12/18/2016
VEHICLE DAMAGE PROFILES
DAMAGE PROFILE - SUV
DAMAGE PROFILE -AUTOMOBILE
Lessons Learned Continued
• The damage profile provides critical information as to whether vehicle two was:
-turning left
-going straight
-or turning right.
(SEE NEXT SLIDE)
• Review all the data in the police accident report. This case, in a small township, was investigated in a thorough manner and provided great evidence to properly reconstruct this accident.
What direction was Vehicle 2 going?
Would you believe the expert that opined that Vehicle 2 was turning left at the time?
Case Study 2Accident Reconstruction Turning Vehicles
AERIAL VIEW OF INCIDENT LOCATION
PHOTO OF INCIDENT LOCATION
23
12/18/2016
PHOTO OF THE INCIDENT LOCATION
AERIAL VIEW OF INCIDENT LOCATION
How should a vehicle turn?
The Vehicle Code• § 3331. Required
position and method of turning.
(a) Right turn.--The driver of a vehicle intending to turn right shall approach the turn and make the turn as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway.
AASHTO - AutoTURN
Lessons Learned !
Read the Expert Reports
Look at the Drawings/Sketches!
What “science” was used or what is the experts basis for his/her conclusions?(Frye/Daubert motion?)
Have your expert provide a supplemental report – if you think it is necessary
HOW SHOULD THE BACK WHEELS TRACK DURING THE TURN?
IS THIS HOW THE VEHCILE SHOULD SAFELY TURN INTO THE
DRIVEWAY?
24
12/18/2016
IS THIS THE 16’ TURNING RADIUS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO –
AUTOTURN PROGRAM?
HOW DO VEHICLES TURN? DO FRONT WHEELS TRACK
FRONT/BACK?
Were there any other errors in the sketch?
The drawing itself – the white edge line was WRONG!
The Guiderail flared ends were WRONG!
Why is that important – because the plaintiff's expert would have the plaintiff traveling on the shoulder if the white line were properly drawn! Did he measure it?(opportunity for powerful cross-examination)
EVEN THE NORTH ARROW IS OFF BY ABOUT 20⁰
Pedestrian - Automobile Accident Case Study # 3
The components of an Pedestrian -Automobile Accident are:
1. The Vehicles
2. The Environment/Roadway
3. The People
HUMAN FACTORS – PEOPLE SYSTEM RELATIONSHIP
25
12/18/2016
Pedestrian Accident
The next series of photos are of crash testing performed in Florida with a crash dummy (me?).
There were five separate scenarios photographed.
Look at the photos and determine what evidence is available and relevant.
Evidence
• Definition: any species of proof, or probative matter, legally presented at the trial of an issue, by the act of the parties, and through the medium of witnesses, records, documents, concrete objects, etc., for the purpose of inducing belief in the minds of the court or jury as to their contention.
• (Blacks Law Dictionary)
Evidence
• How often do you have first hand knowledge about a boundary survey?
• Where do you get that information?• Is it hearsay?• Is it reliable?
• Is it admissible?
The surveyor as investigator-boundary case
• Wooden post – rots away – stains the dirt – round at surface – to nothing below – but watch, you have just destroyed evidence to find this!
THE GOAL OF A RETRACEMENT IS TO WALK IN THE FOOT PRINTS OF THE ORIGINAL SURVEYOR AND LOCATE
EVIDENCE!
The surveyor as investigator-boundary case
• Fence wire – in trees.• Stones – easy to move – check leaves
underneath• R.O.T. Locate the evidence properly, do
not destroy it – survey-photos-etc(Spoliation Cases)
OTHER EVIDENCE TO LOOK FOR:
26
12/18/2016
The Best Evidence
• 1. Vehicle Position• 2. Point of Contact• 3. Skid marks Why are they important”? (See handout)
• 4. Yaw Marks• 5. Debris
• 6. Damage – Other property• 7. Damage – the vehicle.• 8. Off the ground?
• 9. Road Scars – scrapes – gouges.• 10. Body part location.
• 11. Splatter---(Yuck)
GATHERING DATARoadway/Environment
• Tire Marks and what they mean-
Skidmarks – tire friction marks made bya tire that is sliding without rotation on aroad or other surface. Sliding may bedue to braking, collision damage or,rarely, to other circumstances.
Other types of tire marks!
Yaw Marks – a scuffmark made on a surface by a rotating tire which is slipping more or less parallel to its axis.
1.Typically Curved2.Striations – unique3.Can be used to estimate speed.
What Qualifies you as an Expert?
Or are you just Witness?Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses
If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness’ testimonyin the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those
opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the perceptionof the witness, and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of
the witness’ testimony or the determination of a fact in issue, and(c) not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge
within the scope of Rule 702.(As amended Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 17, 2000, eff. Dec.
1, 2000.)
What Qualifies you as an Expert?
SOUTH CAROLINA Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses
If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which (a) are rationally based on the perception of the witness, (b) are helpful to a clear understanding of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in issue, and (c) do not require special knowledge, skill, experience or training.
The Golden (Experts) Rule !
Rule 702. Testimony by ExpertsIf scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assistthe trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact
in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge,skill,experience,training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of
an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficientfacts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliableprinciples and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles
and methods reliably to the facts of the case.(As amended Apr. 17, 2000, eff. Dec. 1, 2000.)
27
12/18/2016
The Expert’s Opinion
Rule 703. Bases of Opinion Testimony by ExpertsThe facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert
bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made
known to the expert at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably
relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions
or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be
admissible in evidence in order for the opinion or inference to be
admitted. Facts or data that are otherwise inadmissible shall not
be disclosed to the jury by the proponent of the opinion or inference
unless the court determines that their probative value in assisting
the jury to evaluate the expert’s opinion substantially outweighs
their prejudicial effect.
(As amended Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 17, 2000, eff. Dec.
1, 2000.)
Are South Carolina, Alabama, Arizona and Pennsylvania Different?
Rule 702. Testimony By ExpertsIf scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge beyond that possessed by a layperson will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.
Are Arizona, New York and Pennsylvania Different?
Rule 703. Bases of Opinion Testimony by Experts
The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence. (Sounds Like the Federal Rule)
Are South Carolina, New York and/or Pennsylvania Dauber or Frye State
( Do you really care about this?)Pa.R.E. 702 does not alter Pennsylvania's adoption of the
standard in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), which requires scientific evidence to have
"general acceptance" in the relevant scientific community.
The Key concept is “general acceptance” in the relevant scientific community.
Pennsylvania and Florida are FRYE STATE!NEW MEXICO is A DAUBERT STATE!
South Carolina IS DAUBERT!
The Expert Report-FYI
• No Depositions in PA court. Depositions permitted in Federal Court, NJ, DC, FL, MD.
• A report is the basis of the testimony you are providing
• Must include methodology, basis, etc (SOUNDS LIKE DAUBERT TEST)
• Opinions to a “reasonable degree of Surveying/professional certainty”
• In NJ – “reasonable probability
PREPARATION - TESTIFYING
• “Preparation
• “Coaching”
• “Horse-shedding”
• “Wood-shedding”
• “Sandpapering”
28
12/18/2016
PREPARATION - TESTIFYING
• “Horse-shedding” – In the past there were carriage sheds near the courthouse in certain areas. James Fenimore Cooper is credited with coining the phrase “horse-shedding the witness. Attorneys would meet with witnesses in these sheds and rehearse testimony for trial.
PREPARING TO TESTIFY
• Preparation for testifying at a deposition-– Start Early
– It is your attorney’s duty to prepare you – BUT
– Remember the three Ps
– Prepare yourself – you are a professional
– Depositions are not like trial testimony
(personal feeling – they are much more difficult and not pleasant experiences)
– Clothing – always professional – depositions become less formal – unless videotaped\
PREPARING TO TESTIFYContinued
Preparation for testifying at a deposition-– Clothing – always professional – depositions become less
formal – unless videotaped\– Behavior – be yourself – no grandstanding – no acting – Looks – stares – glances – looking down – all are non-verbal
cues (good or bad-both ways)– Make sure you are projecting clear and loud enough for the
jury – stenographer to hear.– Never say – “let me be honest with you.”– Watch for the “Ummmms” “okays “ and “know what I mean?”– Once excused – leave
TESTIFYING AT TRIAL
• Direct Examination – this is home run time. Your attorney should be throwing you lob balls. (High hanging curve balls)
• Cross Examination – expect the heat. This is two on- two out bottom of the 9th
time. Expect the fast-ball and/or slider!
Direct Examination
• Review your reports – have it with you
• Review all the material you relied on.
• Rule 612 – refreshed recollection material is discoverable – as expert –my position is so what – but problems of work-product and privilege could arise.
DAUBERT – SHORT COURSE
• Case cite:
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. 509 U..S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).
• Remember Frye (1923)
• A Daubert hearing refers to a pretrial hearing where a court determines whether a proffered expert witness’s testimony is both relevant and reliable, and thus admissible as evidence pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and Daubert
29
12/18/2016
The Daubert Rules
• Daubert – examines the reliability of all experts, regardless of field of expertise, in Federal Court (and most state courts.)
• The decision on admissibility of evidence is by the Judge – not the jury.
Restated – The judge is the GATEKEEPER
• Jury Responsibility• If an expert’s testimony is
admitted, the jury still determines how to weigh the testimony and is free to reject the expert’s testimony in its entirety.
• Kuhmo -The case rejected the distinction between “scientifc” expert testimony “ and “technical or other specialized” expert testimony.
The Daubert Rules(Continued)
• Challenge – A Challenge under Daubert may be raised in limine, on voir dire, or after cross examination. (When to raise this is a strategy move)
• An attorney can make a motion in limine to determine the admissiblity of his own experts testimony. This would likely only be done when the testimony is unusual, novel or otherwise likely subject to a Daubert Challenge.
• Court Responsibility• Like rulings on admissibility, the
court may defer ruling on a Daubert Challenge until the testimony of the expert is heard at trial, and in the context of all testimony at the trial.
• Timely Challenge -The less notice the court has of a challenge, the less likely the court will exclude the testimony - So when should an attorney raise the challenge?
GATEKEEPER
• Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702
• Three Major Requirements:• 1. The proffered witness must be an
expert, i.e., must be qualified,• 2. the expert must testify about matters
requiring scientific, technical or specialized knowledge, (an expert’s testimony is admissible so long as the process or technique the expert used in formulating the pinion is reliable,) and
• 3. the expert’s testimony must assist the trier or fact.
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Trial Judge acts as a gatekeeper to ensure that any and all expert testimony or evidence is not only relevant but also reliable.
The Rules of Evidence embody a strong preference for admitting any evidence that may assist the trier of fact.
Rule 702, which governs the admissibility of expert testimony, has a liberal policy of admissibility.
Thank you!
QUESTIONS?