8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
1/53
{
Geopolitics &
HegemonyBy: Mitch Dunn
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
2/53
Geopolitics:
Geopolitics refers broadly to therelationship between politics and territorywhether on local or international scale.
Geopolitics comprises the practice ofanalyzing, proscribing, forecasting, andthe using of political power over a giventerritory.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
3/53
Geopolitics:
Those geographical variables generally refer to:- geographic location of the country orcountries in question
- size of the countries involved- climate of the region the countries are in
- topography of the region
- demography
- natural resources and technological
development.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
4/53
Geopolitics:
What does all of this actually mean?Geopolitics is the way that we interpretand analyze nations.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
5/53
What, then, is Hegemony?
If Geopolitics describes the state of the nation,Hegemony is a form used to describe the way in
which nations interact.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
6/53
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
7/53
Geopolitics and Hegemony:
Geopolitics and Hegemony are forms thatscholars use to describe the way thatnation-states interact within the world.
There are multiple ways of understandinghow nation-states interact with each other
that come from multiple schools ofthought.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
8/53
Realism:
Realism is a tradition of internationaltheory centered upon four propositions.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
9/53
Realism:
1.States operate under the conditions of Anarchy.There is no actor above states capable of regulatingtheir interactions; states must arrive at relations withother states on their own, rather than it being dictatedto them by some higher controlling entity.
The world system is leaderless: there is no universalsovereign or worldwide government. There is thus no
hierarchically superior, coercive power that canresolve disputes, enforce law, or order the system likethere is in domestic politics.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
10/53
Realism:
2. Egoism:Individuals and groups tend to pursue self-interest.
Groups strive to attain as many resources aspossible.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
11/53
Realism:
3. Groupism:
Politics takes place within and between groups.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
12/53
4. Power politics:
Realism:
Relations between groups are determined bytheir levels of power derived primarily from
their material (military and economic)capabilities.
The overriding national interest of each state isits survival, and there is a general distrust oflong-term cooperation or alliance.
International politics are always power politics
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
13/53
In summary, realists believe that mankindis not inherently benevolent but ratherself-centered and competitive.
Realism:
Common Proponents of Realism:
Kenneth Waltz
John Mearsheimer
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
14/53
Liberalism:
Liberalisms roots lie in the broader liberalthought originating in the Enlightenment.
The central issues that Liberalism seeks to
address are the problems of achievinglasting peace and cooperation ininternational relations, and the various
methods that could contribute to theirachievement.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
15/53
Liberalism:
Democratic Peace Theory:
Democratic leaders must answer to the voters for war, and therefore have anincentive to seek alternatives;
Proponents argue that:
Democratic leaders have practice settling matters by discussion, not by arms,
and do the same in foreign policy;Democracies view non-democracies as threatening, and go to war with themover issues which would have been settled peacefully between democracies;
Democracies tend to be wealthier than other countries, and the wealthy tendto avoid war, having more to lose.
No two democracies have gone to war with eachother.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
16/53
Liberalism:
Economic Interdependence:Nations do not go to war with their tradingpartners
Two nations with interdependenteconomies have an incentive to not go towar with each other.
Two nations with interdependenteconomies have an incentive to de-escalateconflict in the event that it has begun.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
17/53
Liberalism:Golden Arches Theory
No two McDonalds have gone to war witheach other Thomas L. Friedman, TheLexus and the Olive Tree
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
18/53
Liberalism:
Examples of Liberalism in IR today:- United Nations
- NATO
- World Trade Organization
- International Monetary Fund
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
19/53
Liberalism:
In summary, whereas Realists believe theworld to be highly competitive, Liberalistssuggests that there are higher, universallytrue, principles that nations can worktogether to achieve.
Hence, out of Liberalism comes the notion
that the West is Best, that democracy mustbe spread, and that the world must bedeveloped by western, civilized, powers.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
20/53
Constructivism:
Lets play Who can picktodays generic, overused, and
mostly misunderstood, PoMoword of the day?
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
21/53
Constructivism:
Constructivism is the claim thatsignificant aspects of internationalrelations are historically and socially
contingent, rather than inevitableconsequences of human nature or otheressential characteristics of world politics.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
22/53
Wendt laid the theoretical groundwork for challengingwhat he considered to be a flaw shared by bothneorealists and neoliberal institutionalists, namely, acommitment to a crude form of materialism.
The most widely recognized initiator of constructivistinternational relations is Alexander Wendts article,"Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Constructionof Power Politics" (1992)
Constructivism:
Wendt argued that even such a core realist concept as"power politics" is socially constructedthat is, not given
by nature and hence, capable of being transformed byhuman practice.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
23/53
Constructivism:The Constructivist Criticism:
Wendt argued that neorealism presupposes the views thatthe international system operates under anarchy and thatnation-states act in their own self-interests.
Rather than seeing such Structures as given, Wendt arguesthat such beliefs are socially contingent. That is, neorealistviews are not fact, rather, such views are constructedthrough social practice.
Example: North Korea is only deemed an irrational actorbecause we have preconceived notions of what it means tobe a rational actor.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
24/53
Now that we have somebackground informationabout the theoreticalunderstandings of the
international politicalsphere
We can talk about the relatively more tangible aspects ofHegemony (aka the Kzad 95 card).
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
25/53
Hegemony In Praxis
Hegemony can be broken into twoparts:
1) Hard Power
2) Soft Power
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
26/53
Hard Power
THANKS JOSEPH NYE!!!!!
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
27/53
Hard Power:Hard power is a term used to describeinfluence obtained through the use ofmilitary and/or economic coercion toinfluence the behavior or interests of other
political bodies.
This form of political power is often aggressive,and is most effective when imposed by one
political body upon another of lesser militaryand/or economic power.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
28/53
Hard power describes a nation's ability to coerceor induce another nation to perform a course ofaction. This can be done through military powerwhich consists of coercive diplomacy, war, and
alliance using threats and force with the aim ofcoercion, deterrence, and protection.Alternatively economic power which relies onaid, bribes and economic sanctions can be used
in order to induce and coerce.
Hard Power:
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
29/53
Hard Power:
Walter Russell Mead:Sharp Power: Military Force
Sticky Power: Economic Force
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
30/53
Hard Power:
An Example of Hard Power in praxis:Vietnam:
Goals of the Ambitious Hegemon (United States):- To contain monolithic Communism
- Establish South Vietnam as an independent nationHard Power Deployed:
- 500,000 deployed soldiers- Operation Rolling Thunder- Chemical Defoliants (Agent Orange)- Search and Destroy Missions w/
Military Results:- 1.1 million North Vietnamese military deaths- 600 thousand North Vietnamese military wounded- 2 million North Vietnamese civilian deaths- 200,000 South Vietnamese deaths
- 58,000 U.S. deaths
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
31/53
Hard Power:
Other examples:Operation Iraqi Freedom (War in Iraq)
Operation Enduring Freedom (War inAfghanistan)
Sanctions imposed on Iran over proliferation
Operation Unified Protector (Libyan Civil War)
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
32/53
Soft Power:
Coined by Joseph Nye in 1990Rather than the use of coercive threatsand economic payment
Soft Power is the ability to attractand co-opt another nation to wantwhat you want.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
33/53
"a country may obtain the outcomes it wants inworld politics because other countries admiring its values, emulating its example,
aspiring to its level of prosperity and openness want to follow it. In this sense, it is alsoimportant to set the agenda and attract others inworld politics, and not only to force them to
change by threatening military force oreconomic sanctions. This soft power gettingothers to want the outcomes that you want co-
opts people rather than coerces them."
Soft Power:
In the words of Joe himself,
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
34/53
The primary currencies of soft power are anactor's values, culture, policies and
institutionsand the extent to which these"primary currencies", as Nye calls them, areable to attract or repel other actors to "wantwhat you want."
Soft Power:
So what is Soft Power exactly?
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
35/53
Soft Power:
Examples of U.S. Soft Power:Democracy
Capitalism
McDonalds
Hollywood
Justin Beiber
History Textbooks
Religious Views/Tolerance
The Empire State Building
Barak Obama
Lol catsApple Jersey Shore
NYSE UO Debate Program
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
36/53
Smart Power
Defined by the Center for Strategic andInternational Studies:
Smart power refers to the combination of
hard and soft power strategies.Joseph Nye offers the example offighting Terrorism:
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
37/53
Smart Power
Additionally, Hard Power alone is also
insufficient to deter terrorists because itis perceived as the United Statesaggressively lashing out against innocentcivilians.
Soft Power alone is insufficient to winthe hearts and minds of the Taliban.
Therefore, in order to win their heartsand minds, we must simultaneously seta good example for the Taliban while
also bombing their homes.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
38/53
Smart PowerThanks, Joseph Nye
We would be helpless without you!
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
39/53
Now, since the world is
supposedly incompetition, whos
winning?
Polarity:
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
40/53
Polarity:The ways in which power is distributedwithin the international system.
There are generally three types ofsystems:
- Unipolarity
- Bipolarity
- Multipolarity
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
41/53
Polarity: a distribution of power inwhich there is one state with most of thecultural, economic, and militaryinfluence.
Unipolarity:
Proponents of unipolarity propose thatunipolarity is the most stable of systemsbecause one power can regulate andmanage the rest of the internationalsphere, which maintains a peacefulinternational order.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
42/53
Bipolarity is a distribution of power in which
two states have the majority of economic,military, and cultural influenceinternationally or regionally.
Bipolarity:
Proponents of bipolarity is necessary to checkoverly regulatory regimes that result in
unipolarity.
l l
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
43/53
Multipolarity:Multipolarity is a distribution of powerin which more than two nation-stateshave nearly equal amounts of military,cultural, and economic influence.
Proponents of multipolarity argue thatmultipolarity deters large scale conflictbecause the world is regionalized.
b l
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
44/53
CounterbalancingCounterbalancing occurs when one or
more states attempts to limit the powerof another through a variety of meanssuch as sanctions, treaties, or potentially
conflict.Offshore Balancing: Also known asproxy wars, this of this as outsourcing
balancing to other countries.Examples:South Korea/North KoreaIsrael/Iran
Afghanistan During Cold War
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
45/53
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
46/53
Critical Perspectives:
H B d
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
47/53
Hegemony Bad:The belief in benign hegemony, or what
is known as American Exceptionalism,perpetuates a constant state of invasivewars.
- Iraq/Afghanistan- Latin America
- Vietnam
Th C i
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
48/53
Threat Construction:The notion of what does and does not
constitute a threat is based uponpreconceived notions of stability.
We only understand North Korea as anirrational actor because we havealready cemented our beliefs aboutrationality, and, grounded them in
beliefs from our own perspective.
Example: Pan K, Iran Proliferation
Th C i
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
49/53
Threat Construction:
Self Fulfilling Prophecy: The reliance on,and necessitation of, the construction ofthreats is precisely what brings thethreats into existence
Example: Arms Races
E i
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
50/53
Empire:
Empire is a three book series written byMichael Hardt and Antonio Negri in themid-1990s and published in 2000.
Hardt and Negri and post-marxistphilosophers.
Hardt is an American Literary Critic.Negri is and Italian Marxist Sociologistswho organized kidnappings andmurders of major Italian political figures.
E i
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
51/53
Empire:the book theorizes an ongoing transition from a "modern" phenomenon ofimperialism, centered around individual nation-states, to an emergent
postmodern construct created among ruling powers which the authors callEmpire with different forms of warfare.
...according to Hardt and Negri's Empire, the rise of Empire is the end ofnational conflict, the "enemy" now, whoever he is, can no longer be
ideological or national. The enemy now must be understood as a kind ofcriminal, as someone who represents a threat not to a political system or anation but to the law. This is the enemy as a terrorist....In the "new orderthat envelops the entire space of... civilization", where conflict betweennations has been made irrelevant, the "enemy" is simultaneously"banalized" (reduced to an object of routine police repression) and
absolutized (as the Enemy, an absolute threat to the ethical order.
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
52/53
8/12/2019 Geopolitics & Hegemony
53/53