8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
1/13
LITERATURE OF PEASANT LIFE IN
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY GERMANY
The rise of peasant literature as a genre belongs to the nineteenth century, to the
middle years of the so-calied
Biedermeierzeit
However, aimost throughout the
eighteenth century iiterary works, usuaiiy lyric or epic poetry, on the subject of the
peasant or peasant life enjoyed wide currency in Germany. Eighteenth-century
Germ an literature of peasant life is remarkable for the uniformly sympathetic view it
offers of its subject. Although a number of works include some degree of empirical
deta il of rural life, in general the actua l condition of the G erman peasantry receives
only marginal attention. Nor does such literature offer a programme of social,
political, or economic reform, despite the fact that abuses of the peasantry do figu re
in it and that most of it was written during a time of intense interest among public
figures in the problems of
the
agrarian economy. Germ an literature of peasant iife
owes much to the pastorai poetry of classical antiquity and to its modern European
imitators in Engiand, France, Italy, and Spain. But it has a topicality of its own,
none the less, and a political dimension of a characteristic kind: in the curiously
obiique manner typicai of much poiiticai comment in German iiterature,
eighteenth-century German literature of peasant life offers both a critique of
contem porary society and a vision of an idealized society, a Utopian com munity such
as the bourgeois inteilectual of limited m eans, social mobility, and influence might
envisage it.
The central feature of this literature is the raising of the standing of the peasant in
moral, political, and aesthetic terms. While it could include both major works of
hterature and also what were virtually no more than rhymed almanach articies,
literature of peasant life enjoyed considerable popular success and it undoubtedly if
indirectly made an important contribution to informed political discussion on the
subject of the peasant class. The process of restoring the status of the German
peasant, his moral and political rehabilitation as it were, found expression, broadly
speaking, in three ways.
The first concerns his literary status. Traditionally a comic figure, the peasant
became in the eighteenth century the subject of serious literature. In a rejection of
Gottsched s strictures on his suitability in that cap acity , the peasant was shown in
prose idylis and in lyric and epic verse as capable of deep feelings, of sentiments of
love, honour, and generosity, capable of feeling pain, both physical and m ental, and ,
at a iater
date,
of patriotism. Secondty, the peasant
was
represented
as
the repository
of tru e or natu ral hum an goodness. His mental and morai attitudes and his
manner of iiving were shown to be fundamentaily different from and supierior to
those of civilized society, whether this is understood to signify the court and the
ruling classes, or simply the town-dwellers. (At the end of the century, the
iniiabitants of small towns came to be accepted as pa rt of rura i culture, extending
In his Versuch einer critischen ichtkumt (Leipzig, 1751), p. 582. I should point out that I have no
attempted to deal with one central aspect of this problem that has attracted much interest in recent
scholarship, namely, the rhetorical tradition . Friedrich Sengle s pioneering article, W unse hbild L an d
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
2/13
8 o Literature of Peasan t Life
the scope of literature of peasant life and incidentally, providing nineteenth-century
German writers with one of their most popular subjects.) Closely linked with this
aspect of peasant life and an important constituent of its literary presentation was
the rejection of French urb an culture and manners as being not merely artificial,
bu t socially divisive. The association of the rural world with a specifically Germ an
life-style, implicit in much eighteenth-century German iiterature on the peasantry,
was however developed only in the nineteenth
century.
The na tural goodness of the
peasant was presented as expressing itself in a natura l piety, which giadly acknow-
ledged divine providence a t work in the world, and made him a dutiful subject of his
master, or a loyal member of the village community, according to the jjolitical stance
of the w riter. Moreover, the peasan t s sense of wonder and his delight in Go d s
creation were also seen as endowing him with a new aesthetic sensibility, a capacity
for the perception of goodness and beauty not exceeded by any other estate or social
group.
Th irdly, the peasant worid is shown in eighteenth-century German iiterature to
be one of natu ral social harmony and usefulness. If this is seen not to be the case in
any particuiar region, the fault is cieariy attributed to the irresponsibility of the
authorities rather than to peasant brutishness. Particuiariy in the work oiSturm und
Drang w riters, not only are the authorities shown on occasion to harm the peasant
personally if they ill-treat him or restrict his freedom, they also stultify the
development of his naturai talents which, the writers imply, are traditionaliy
empioyed for the good of the community and of society.
To consider each of these points in greater detail: in the process of transforming the
herdsman and the tiller of the soil into a human being iike the rest of
u s ,
in the
presentation of the peasant as a major literary personage, the Svtass writer, painter ,
and publisher Salomon Gessner played a vital part. In his first collection oildyllen
(1756), which were published in his native Ztirich when he was twenty-six and
which founded his extraordinary fame in eighteenth-century Europe, Gessner
presented his sylvan shepherds primarily as people of deep and delicate feeling. It is
of course obvious that his Damons, Chloes, Milons, and Mirtils have no more than a
tenuous relationship w ith the contemporary wiss or German peasant — in contrast
to the Swiss peasants in A lbrecht von Haller s majestic epic poem Die lpen
{1
729),
we never see Philiis or Chioe dirtying their pretty hands to make aus Miich der
Alpen Meel .̂ But what they did do was to establish in the minds of the sophisticated
European reading public, including Rousseau, Turgot, and Mirabeau, as well as
Swiss and German readers, the notion of an ideal human comm unity set in a local
landscape.* The persuasivenMS of Gessner s peasants lay in the comm unal
organization of their world. They are not mere love-sick swains and maids, but are
social beings, always mindful of famiiy and comm unai bonds, affectionate in their
care for their children and aged and in their readiness to aid the poor and the sick,
and they are faithful in love. Phiiiis replaces the iost goats of her poor neighbour,
Idas prays to Pan to increase his flock so tha t, as he says, ich sie mit meinen armen
Nachbam teiien [kann] , and Aschines refuses the offer from Menalkas, a courtier,
^ Haller and Saiis-Seewis, edited by Adolf Frey, Deutsche National Lilieratur (hereafter referred to as
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
3/13
EDA SAGARRA 81
whom he has rescued in the mountains, of gorgeously-robed girls, contrasting them
with his 'braunes Madchen . . . [geschmiickt] mit frischen Rosen und einem bunten
Kranz'.* The statistics of Gessner's literary success, with sixty editions and transla-
tions into some twenty languages in the eighteenth century, followed by a sudden
and enduring neglect, are indeed extraordinary.^ The reasons cieariy have much to
do with the iyric expressiveness of his prose, and with the critique, perhaps more
evident to Gessner himseif than to most of his readers, of contemporary society.* His
Idytlen estabiished the country-dweiler (as against the Roman topios of the
statestnan-philosopher-turned-countryman)'' as a moral person and an emotional
being, a fit subject for discriminating as well as for didactic pens. His influence is
discernible on those poems where the writer has his peasant swain use Petrarchan
conceits or other traditional conventions of European love poetry in singing praise of
the beloved.* Although in contemporary peasant society economic interest con-
tinued to determine the marriage partner, in Gessner, Schubart, Voss, and others
the love relationship of these literary peasants is charged with the kind of feeling
normally reserved in literature for the relationships of tbe upper classes; at the same
time their behaviour is characterized by the kind of virtuous restraint and delicacy of
feeling of an idealized society, one which would become widely characteristic of
peasant literature in the Biedermeier era.
The contribution of J. H. Voss to peasant love poetry is a significant one, for he
was the first to integrate it into socially critical idylls and odes. The central
importance of his work in the present context lies in his having established the
capacity of the 'authentic' peasant for emotional experience, indeed in his having
helped give expression in his idyils and odes to the peasant's capacity for physical
and emotional suffering, as weii as for human happiness. It is hard for us to realize
how radical this was. The traditional social hierarchy in eighteenth-century Europe
rested on the assumption of a corresponding hierarchy of physical and emotional
sensibility. Just as in earlier times educated people might not (in theory at least) be
tortured, whereas it was thought necessary in the case of the uneducated to do so in
order to 'get through to them', to extract the truth, so too in the eighteenth century
people still believed that peasants actually felt physical pain much less acutely then
their social superiors.' A Pomeranian cleric expressed this view somewhat crudely
in 1684 when he suggested that peasants, like salt cod, were best when beaten soft.''
Similarly, peasants were believed to be virtually incapable of any but the most
primitive emotions, feeiing iust rather than iove,^^ a primitive hunger and greed for
Gessner,
Idyllen,
Kritische Ausgabe, edited by E. T. Voss (Stuttgart, 1973), pp. 23, 25, 48.
'
See John Hibberd,
Salomon Gessner
(Cambridge, 1976), especially pp. 127-43.
* For a critical reassessment of Gessner's work and its modem reception, see E. T. Voss, 'Salomon
Geflner', in Deutsche Dichter des 16. fahrhunderts, edited by Benno von Wiese (Berlin, 1977), pp. 249-75,
especially pp. 264 ff.
^
Illustrated in the case of Germany by the poems of Freiherr von Canitz (1654—99), highly thought of
by his contemporaries.
* As in H a g e d o m , Der verliebte
Bauer,
C. F. D. Schubart, Winteriied eines schwabischen auemjunge or
Fischerlied (both 1783, when he was a prisoner in the Hohenasperg), or J. H. Voss, Die Wassertragerin
(1793).
See Erich Trunz, 'Der Spathumanismus um 1600 als Standeskultur', in Barockfbrschung, edited by
Richard Alewyn, second edition (Cologne, 1966), p. 150.
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
4/13
82 Literature of Peasant Life
food and drink, and imposing harsh discipiine on their children and other depen-
dents. Voss,
however, and many of his contemporaries, particularly those associated
with the Sturm und Drang showed the peasant as capable not just of suffering
physically, but also of experiencing the pangs ofiove; moreover he showed him as
being capable of tender emotions towards wife and family, of concern at the
sufferings of
others,
of gratitude to overlord and to neighbours, and of righteous
anger a t injustice, whether inflicted on himself or on others.^^ Voss was primarily
concerned with poiiticai issues in his poetry of peasant
life,
hut he was also sensible
of the innovatory literary character of his work, and the problems to be overcome. In
a letter to H. Chr. Boie, fi-om whom he had taken over the editorship of the
Gottinger
Musenalmanach
in 1774, he co mm ented o n his poe m.
Die
KirschenpfiUckerin: 'Mein
Id y l le .. . ist fertig und gefallt m ir sehr. Es ist ein Versuch, wie weit man die Denkart
der Landmadchen veredeln kann, ohne unnaturlich zu werden.'^^ A few years iater
M atth ias Claudias, presenting a GenreitW of contemporary peasant life in Schleswig
in
Paul
Erdmanns
Fest
{1782 , has the narrator comment: 'Mein Vetter und ich war
wie vom Himmel gefallen, denn solche Bauern waren uns noch nicht vorgekom-
men.'^* The irony of the comment is here directed, not at the idealization of peasant
iife, which is undoubtediy there, but rather at the traditionai iiterary stereotype of
the peasan t. I t was Voss too, in that innovatory decade, the
1770s,
which was also a
time of acute rural economic crisis and human suffering in many regions of
Germany, who portrayed the peasant in German iiterature as a tragic figure, the
victim of his social and poiiticai circumstances. In the first of two importan t idyils.
Die Leibeigenen (1775), the plight of
the victims
of feudal tyranny (and stupidity, as i
Junker
Kord
some twenty years iater (1793)) is reveaied. Sensitive to the sufferings of
their companions, to the bitter anguish of iovers forcibiy separated, protest brings
brutal vengeance. None, not the young nor the aged, the sick, the old, nor the
maimed, is spared. The peasants are shown as sensitive to the feelings of one other,
respecting individuality in a way unknown to the ignorant establishment, brutalized
by generations of tnindless power. In
Die Freigelassenen
(1775), by contrast, Vo
offers a harmonious portrait of peasant life under the guidance of an altruistic and
visionary lord, the peasants no less virtuous or indeed 'authentic ' in their prosperity,
based on free endeavour and following the paternal advice of their former master
{Idyllen pp.
79-83).
T he theme of the 'good' master is of course a common one in the
1770s and 1780s, reflecting to some extent the preference of proponents of the
ptopular enlightenment for paternalist reform over radical social change.^ '
An interesting subsidiary aspect of the literary rehabilitation of the peasant in
eighteenth-century German literature — and one, it must be said, on which much
work remains to be done — is the portrayal of the peasant woman and
giri.
At a time
when the so-called popular morai philosophers, such as Camf>e, Ehrenberg , Ew ald,
Pockels, and others,^* were demanding feats of submission an d moral endurance
of
'^J . H. Voss, Idyllen edited by E. T. Voss (Heidelberg, 1968) (reprint of 1801 Konigsberg edition),
pp. 84, 26 ff., 87 f., 149 f.
' ' Voss, Briefe
3
vols (Hildesheim , 1971), m , 149.
'* From Der Wandsbecke r Bote in Claudius, Samtliche Werke edited by Hannsludwig Geiger (Wiesbad
n.d.),
p . 193.
' ' As, for example, E. von Rochow, Pcstalozzi, or Chr. Salzm ann.
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
5/13
EDA SAGARRA 83
vreimen both in the single and in the married state, deeming these to be preordained
by divine and/or natural law, writers on peasant life offered something very
different. Peasant women, whether farmers, cottagers, or day labourers, were shown
as having a certain authority in their own sphere, based on their useful life and the
self-esteem arising therefrom.^' Some were even shown as exercising a certain
authority over their men-folk, though its nature was not 'mannishness' but rather
what is caiied in Irish the 'sugain sneachta' (= rope of
snow),
nameiy, the power of
proven affection. The pretty, seif-confident no-nonsense peasant girl is a not
uncommon iiterary type in the poetry of the last decades of the century, pert as in the
poems of
the
Wiener Almctrmch, triumphant, as she pours a bucket of water out of her
bedroom window over the head of Junker Wenze auf Schmuriachsbuttei, coquett-
ish but affectionate in the iove poems of the Kempten collection, Vermischte
Bauem-
Lieder (1776).^* The anacreontic proets allowed their female peasant protagonists a
certain erotic provocativeness not quite in keeping with the natural virtue now
commoniy attributed to them.'* But the women's capacity for love is seen by
virtuaiiy ail writers on the subject as at least equai to that of their male partners.
Perhaps the most powerful example of this, and a work which had a formative
influence on the Biedermeier peasant heroine, not always fully acknowledged, is
Goethe's Hermann und Dorothea (1797). The endlessly-quoted line, made familiar
from Buchmann's ubiquity in the later nineteenth century, 'Dienen lerne beizeiten
das Weib nach ihrer Bestimmung',^" has led commentators to overlook the inde-
pendence of spirit, the impressive moral and physical strength of Dorothea, which is
seen to be anchored in her rural background. Reading her iong iast speech, which
begins, 'O nie weiB der verstandige Mann, der im Schmerz uns zu raten / Denkt
. . .',^^ where she confesses her passion for and renunciation of Hermann and the
home offered her, we can perhaps see the prototype of the strong and passionate
heroines of Beidermeier literature of rural life, such as we encounter notably in
Gotthelf,
but aiso in Immermann, Stifter, and Auerbach.
The presentation ofiove and marriage in eighteenth-century German literature of
peasant life," schematic though it is, differs substantially from that of hterature of
upper-class or burgher circles, suggesting a freedom of choice governed by inciina-
tion, an essentiai equaiity of the sexes, based on their mutually important contribu-
tion to the famiiy home and community. The truth or accuracy of this portrait was,
however, hardiy bome out by a comparison with actuai circumstances of rural life.
This is an aspect of the poiiticai function of such literature, namely, an attempt on
the part of its bourgeois authors £0 offer and to win public support for a vision of a
S e e Uli B r a k e r , Lebensgeschichte
and
natiirliche Ebenteuer des Armen Mannes
in
Tockenburg (1789 , r e p r in t ed
Ber l in and W e i m a r , 1 9 6 6 ), pp. 259 If., or
Hermann
und
Dorothea,
vm, I. 60: 'Die t a t i g e M u t t e r b e l e b t im
G a n z e n die W i r t s c h a f t ' ( G o e t h e , Gedenkausgabe
der
Werke, Briefe
und
Gesprache, ed i t ed by E. Beu t l e r ,
24 vo l s (Zu r i ch , 1948 -63) , IX, 221).
' J . A. B l u m e n a u e r , Wundersame
Klage
eines Landmadchens
in der Stadt,
D NL 135/2 , pp . 7 0 - 7 2 ; V o s s ,
Idyllen,
p. 1.42; see also Leopo ld Schm idt, 'L ieder far den Landm ann: Ein K apitel Aufklarung und Volkslied', in
Die osterreichische Literatur:
Ihr
Profit
d Wd 8
J h h d t
S ) d i d b H b
4 p , p uklaru ng und Volkslied, in
Die osterreichische Literatur:
Ihr
Profit an
der
Wende vom 18.
tum ig.
Jahrhund ert ly^o-lSjo), ed i t ed by H e r b e r t
Zeman (Graz, 1979), pp. 873-90, especially p. 885.
M . J . Prandstetter,
mn r̂r/ierf,
DNL 135/2, pp. 3
f.
^ VII,
1. 114,
quoted
in G.
Biichmann, eJiHgelte We
., o
•
WorU,
26th edition (Berlin 1918),
p. 148. (The
first
edition appeared in 1864.)
Goethe,
G edenkausgabe,
ix, 236 ff. (ix, 11. 134-81).
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
6/13
8 4 Literature of Peasant Life
new and just society, as the aiternative to, or perhaps in many cases only as an
escape from, the prevailing system of political, social, and moral constrain ts.
As
par t of
the
generai eievation of the image of
the
peasan t in the eighteenth century,
the notion of
him
as the embodiment o f'natu ral human goodness' proved persua-
sive. Almost
a
generation before Rousseau, the
Swiss
doctor and polymath Albrecht
von Haller (1708-77) presented the Alpine peasants in his epic poem Die lpen
(1729)
as
exemplary for their hard work thrift, and
love
of God and their fellow men,
showing them to enjoy a fulfiiied and contented existence. Hailer discovered the
Swiss landscape for eighteenth-century Europe, not least as a resuit of a long trip
undertaken
in 728
in search of botan ical and other specimens, though the empirical
awareness of his most famous work also owes much to hterary sources, such as
Brockes's Irdisches VergnHgen in Gott and English pastoral po et ry . Yet his prais
the mountain landscape and its inhabitan ts was no straightforward Swiss patriot-
ism, but was rather part of a forthright and bitter critique of contemporary Swiss
urban government.^* In that remote landscape he sought and found the original
form of republican Switzerland. While the influence of the Horatian topos is clearly
evident in
Die
Alpen a new and significant element has been added to the iiterary
tradition, namely, tha t the protagonists were now peasan ts. Moreover, despite the
elevated tone and substance of the poem, there is much reference to the actual tasks
which peasants performed.
In Salomon G essner's work, on the other hand, the 'au then tic' peasant is absent.
The focus of his work is on nature and on natu re's power over those who would hear
her voice. Those who live close to nature,
figments
of his poetic imagination, as he
confesses them to be in his Preface, are virtuous and kindly beings: 'Sie sind frei von
alien den Bedtirfnissen, die nur die ungiuckiiche Entfernung von der Natur notwen-
dig machet, sie empfangen bei unverdorbenem Herzen und Verstand ihr Gliick
gerade aus der Hand dieser milden Mutter.'^^
Gessner was, after Hailer, the first German poet to write a major literary work on
the subject of Nature versus Culture, and the happy accident of his European
success^* greatly encouraged his imitators,
as
weil as identifying Switzerland in the
public mind as the home ofsimple rurai virtue .^' The na rrator in G essner's
Idyllen
is
not a countryman; he learns through his encounter with nature and the inhab itants
of his Utopian landscapie
to
despise what passes for civilized iiving: 'Oft
reiB
ich mich
aus der Stadt ios und fliehe in einsame G egenden, dann entreifit die Schonheit der
Natur m ein Gemiit allemdem Ekel und aiien widrigen Eindrucken,
die
mich aus der
James Thomson , The Seasons (1730) and Bodmer's translation of Milton's Paradise Lost (1732)
admired and influential works in eighteenth-century Germany, were published after Die lpen was
written.
Com pare his two poem s, 'Die Falschhcit mensch licher Tug end en' (1730) and 'Die verdorbenen
Sitten' (1731) with itsj uv en alia n superscription, 'Difficile est satiram non scribere'.
Gepiers Werke edited by Adoif Frey, DN L
41/1,
pp. 63 f.
^' It was the future father-in-law of Therese Forster-Huber, Michael Huber, who translated Gessner
into Frenc h. He rightly felt that Gessne r's lucid prose was adm irably suited for teaching purposes and he
used the idylls to instruct h is Parisian pupils, among them Dide rot's friend, the physiocrat T ui^ ot.
Th is view was confirmed and publicized by the 'discovery' of a genuine example o f Socrate rustiq ue'
in the person of a Swiss peasant known as Kleinjogg (= Jakob Gujer of Wermatswili). J. C. Hirzel of
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
7/13
EDA SAGARRA 85
Stadt verfotgt haben' (
Gefiners Werke
p. 63). Piety, the Virgilian
pietas
is singled out
by Gessner as the special characteristic of his shepherd figures. This is a recurrent
tlieme in subsequent iiterature of peasant life, where the actual speaker is himself a
peasant, as for exampie in the dawn and evening
songs,
the seasonai songs and work
songs of the 1770s and 1780s.̂ *
While the literary influence of the pietas
motif,
duty towards God, one's master,
community, family, and feliow-men is evident,^' criticism of contemporary poiiticai
and sociai structures is cieariy present in literature of peasant life, not least in
Gessner. The peasants in the work songs and seasonal songs express wonder at
God's creation, they manifest their own readiness to co-operate with the divine plan
or with nature to make the earth fertile. The contrast with the upper classes is ciear
enough even without being made explicit, as Leon makes it in his
Morgenlied:
Und nicht
wie
unsre groBen Herrn
So faul und muBig ruh'n.
* (DNL
135/2,
p. 98)
The inciusion of so many aspects of the peasant's iife in the work songs, the overall
impression of meaningful and productive labour, given in these simple rhythmical
verses, which were published in the various almanachs and therefore achieved wide
geographical distribution and were read by a relatively wide sector of the educated
ranks of society, helped overcome the traditionai literary stereotype of the idle
self-induigent peasant and offered instead a dignified human being with whom the
reader might identify.' The physiocratic teachings on the prime importance of the
land for the wealth of the nations, and the widespread food shortages in the second
half of the eighteenth century, the actuai experience of hunger by many German
inteilectuals in their childhood and as students,^' helped make the life and work of
the peasantry meaningful and reievant to their own iives.
Individually and collectively the writers of the
Sturm und Drang
greatly enhanced
the moral stature of the peasant in hterature. Thus in his idiosyncratic but highly
interesting idyll.
Die
SchafSchur (1775), set in the Palatinate, Maler Muller shows
his genial central figure, the peasant Walter, as possessing an intuitive understand-
ing of central moral issues. A popular theme in Sturm und Drang writing, infanticide,
is discussed by the sheep-shearers after they listen to an old folksong.^^ Waiter, who
is presented as a rough but kindly soul and a loving father, sharply criticizes punitive
justice, showing concern for the ignorant criminal without condoning the crime, and
suggesting instead prevention through adequate social supptort:
^* Many tried their hand at this genre: M atthias Clau dius, Schubart, the A ustrian von Leon; Voss wrote
many work songs, as did minor poets. A number of Voss's songs were set to music by well-known
composers, such as C. P . E. Bach and J . A. P. Schulz. ee H. Voegt in
Voss, Werke
second edition (Berlin
and W eim ar, 1976), p. 412; also Schm idt, 'Lieder fiir den L and m ann '.
'And an air of piety to the Gods should shine through the Poem, w hich so visibly appe ars in all the
parks of antiquity' — Alexander Pope in A Discourse an Pastoral Poetry (1717), quoted in J. Barrell and
J. Bull,
English Pastoral Verse
(London, 1974), p. 253.
^ For a reassessment of the popular Enlightenment view, see R. Wittmann, 'Der lesende Landmann:
Zur Rezeption aufklarerischer Bemiihungen durch die bauerliche Bevolkerung im 18. Jahrhandert ' , in
D a n B e r e n d e i and o t h e r s , Der
Bauer Mittel-
und Ostdeutschlands im so^io okonomischen
Wandel des 18.
und ig.
Jahrhunderts ( C o l c ^ e and Vienna, 1973), pp . 142-96, with extensive references; but see also L. Schm idt,
'Lieder
fur
den Landm ann',
and
his 'Vom *'Baucmlied zum Volksiied : Aus dem Zeitraum von
1779
bis 1819', in Zeman, pp.
865-71.
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
8/13
86
Literature of Peasant Life
WeiS auch, was das
ist
Betriibnis und Pein, und wohin einem
[.fie]
Traurigkeit bringen kan
Hab'
einmal mussen helfen ein Madel zum Gericht fiihren. Vergess' mein Lebtag
nicht
wie s
da ausgeseiien. Das arme Ding Wie sie da hinging im TodesschweiB, den hitteren Marter-
weg »
This
was
in fact
a
peculiarly relevant
issue
in contemporary peasant
society,
where
it
was becoming increasingly difficult for economic reasons, and in certain areas
because of rural over-population, for young peasants to set up home and marry.
Waiter's kindness and concem for the young is shown here and in Mulier's iater
work. Das
Nufikemen
to be the product of experience and of reflection on his own
social environment, where the interdependence of individuals is seen to be essential
to the prosperity of aii. Another, more overtly political example is the peasan t who
challenges the moral authority of his overlord, regardiess of the consequences to
himseif.
The naturai courage of the peasant, his inborn sense of iionour, is
contrasted, as in Burger's poem An seinen durchlauchtigen Tyrannen (1776 i
Lauenburger Musenalmanach
or Voss's satirical idylls, with the alieged
Ehre
o
Junker. Since
Ehre
was traditionaiiy accepted as being the product of
nobie
biood,
thus determining the immutability of feudal society, it was a particularly sharp
satiric comment on V oss's pa rt when he transferred to the East Elbian Junkers the
stupidity once considered characteristic of the peasant estate: Junk er Kord (1793) is
presented as a typicai product of the species; he is so stupid that he cannot even
envisage the possibility of his being cuckolded, that 'des Kutschers Tuck ihm einen
Kuckucksstreich spielen'
{Idyllen
p. 142), which by impiication would expose the
aristocratic pretensions to power and privilege based on Ehre for what they are
worth.
The natu ral sociai harmony of the peasant worid as presented in eighteenth-century
German (and other) literature is both a iiterary topos, derived from the idyils of
Theocritus and the Eclogues of Virgii, and aiso implicit in the classical tradition, a
form of social criticism of contemporary life and morals. The history of pastoral
fioetry in westem Europe in the early modern period has demonstrated the genre's
potential for direct poiiticai comment, as weii as emphasizing a fact which escaped
many nineteenth-century commentators, nameiy, the receptivity of audiences for
such criticism.^" Thus it was a centrai feature of what at first reading might seem
innocuous poetry of German rura l life in the second half of the eighteenth century, to
draw attention to the destruction or the undermining of that 'natural social
harmony' by an unjust authority or by the abuse of inherited
power.
Gessner, so long
dismissed as a 'naive' poet, was in fact one of the first to make this point expiicit,
when in the preface to his Idytlen {1756) he referred to the Goiden Age, associating
the heroes and heroines of his work with that period, and explicitly distancing them
from the peasants of his own time, in marked contrast to the view expressed by
Haller in Die
Alpen.
Peasants today, he writes polemicaiiy, are 'ungesittet und schiau
und niedertrach tig', but they are so because of the economic and political thrali of
their
lives;
where 'der Landmann mit saurer Arbeit unterthanig seinem Fursten und
den Stadten den UberfluB liefern muB', it
is
'Unterdruckung und Armut' that have
made the peasant what he is {Gefiners Werke p. 64). Such a view, it must be added
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
9/13
EDA SAGARRA 87
did not fit in at all with the new reputation of Switzerland as the country of the free.
It was however an accurate comment on certain regions of the country, namely,
those areas where the peasants were under the direct authority of the local Stadtrat or
overlord. Gessner, like Haller before him, and Voss, Muller, and other German
poets of the later eighteenth century, showed awareness of the political aspect of the
peasant problem , in stressing that the happiness, prosperity, and the virtue of the
rural community depended to a large extent on the degree of freedom, especially the
conditions of
tenure.
Many writers therefore set their poems of idyilic contentment
in regions where tenure
was
thought favourable to the peasant, or where a stratum
of
small farmers existed, as in the Palatinate or in parts of Schleswig-Holstein, Tyrol,
Swabia, or Baden, where the long-reigning margrave, Friedrich Karl (1738-1811)
was the leading proponent of French physiocratic thinidng and the only prince to
attempt to apply such ideas systematically. Those depicting peasant suffering and
deprivation were set primarily in the regions of manorial tenure in East Elbia,
especially Mecklenburg and Prussia, and in aristocratic estates in Austria. ^
Adelskritik therefore plays a prominent role in the literature of
the
late eighteenth
century — and indeed it remained a characteristic of iiterature oi peasant life,
including the Dorfgeschichte, in the Biedermeier period, despite the radically different
political function of such literature. The criticism was both specific and general. It
was specific in the sense that the demands made by the landowning aristocracy on
the peasants were seen as a prime cause of their wretchedness. Moreover, opposition
by the landowners to the efforts of various territorial rulers, such as those of Prussia
and Austria, to emancipate the peasantry made them, the aristocracy, rather than
the monarch, the object of attack. It was generai in the sense that German iiterature
of peasant iife was in fact a form of bourgeois critique of the whole social, legal,
economic, and poiiticai system which had been designed to exclude the bourgeoisie
from participation, and which by the last decades of the century seemed to so many
educated Germans not merely unjust, but corrupt and antiquated.^*
As has already been mentioned, the naturai sociai harmony of the peasant estate
and the sociai usefuiness of
the
peasantry are shown in literature to be impaired by
the inefficiency, greed, or even viciousness of their masters. Common grievances
against the nobility, the spoiling of crops through hunting, taxation, forced iabour,
or miiitary service, are featured, mainiy in poetry, between 1770 and 1800.^ Much
play is made, as for example by Claudius in Paul Erdmanns Fest or by Voss in Die
Freigelassenen
and
Die
Erleichteten
{1800),
of
the
material effects on peasant work of a
kindly or liberal master. Bourgeois masters too can be the object of resentment or the
butt of satire — in the eighteenth century as in the twentieth, the social divide
between nobility and upper bourgeoisie was hardly as great as that between the
^ Eva Kon ig makes this point in a letter to Lessing (14 Octob er 1770) when she contrasts the a pathy of
labourers n an A ustrian 'Herrschaftlicher We inberg' with the peasantry of her native Palatinate Lessings
Briefifoeduel not Eva Konig tj^o i^yS
(Munich, 1979), p. 31). By contrast the Tyrolean peasant, generally a
figure of fun in eighteenth-century Viennese p opula r comedy, comes off well in any encounter with city
folk. His self-possession unconsciously reflects the tradition of relative political
and
social independen ce
enjoyed
by
the Tyrolean peasantry since the late Middle Ages.
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
10/13
88
Literature of
Peasant
Life
latter and the
Kleinburgertum to
which many intellectuals
belonged.̂ * y
contrast th
free peasant community, whether of iiberated serfs, or of the indejjendent tenants of
the Paiatinate, Bavaria, or Swabia, are shown to be not jus t happy and prosperous,
but socially responsible. Peasant society, left to its own devices, is shown to resemble
a family. Love ra ther than assertive authority educates and acts
as a
sociaily binding
force in Pestalozzi 's Lienhard und Gertrud or J . H . M erck 's Geschichte des Herm Oheim
(1778). Herr Oheim, once a state minister and now iiving as a simple farmer, treats
both his children and his servants with affection and trust. The servants sit at the
table w ith the family^' and are allowed to express their views freely. The
Knecht
by
contrast with the visiting merchant, can afford to marry, since a weli-run farm
provides a decent if frugai living for all. Merck's prose tale — it is a kind of extended
Genrebild
of rural life
— is
a good example of why the rehabilitation of the peasant as
a social and human being should appeal to middle-class authors.
Herr Oheim illustrates the popular notion of Nature versus Civilization in his own
life; more importantly, he demonstrates the roie which the burgher of education
might hope to piay in the actuai rurai scene. H err Oheim 's education and experience
have given him the basis to acquire the necessary technicai skills, which, applied to
the derelict farm he takes over, help to make the whole region prosperous. The
educated man is shown to have an important function in initiating and implement-
ing social reforms, of modernizing
society.
(In the
sequel, Herr Oheim der Jungere
als
published in W ielands
Teutscher
Merkur
{
1781—82 , Oheim's son is forced off the la
by taxation and the general chicanery of court officials.) In the writings of a number
of Merck's contemporaries, as in Biedermeier peasant literature, it is the educated
man of hum ble origin, usually a local clergyman or school teacher, who acts as the
friend and counsellor of the peasant, helping him to use more rational methods of
husbandry, sustaining him in times of trial, whether through bad harvest and
pestilence, or through the malpractices of the powerful.* Eighteenth-century
literature of peasant life can therefore be seen in the context of contemporary
political and social thinking on agrarian matters. There was however a marked
difference between the judgement of imaginative hterature and the writings of
political philosophers, economic theorists, iawyers, and the authors of
the
widely-
read
Hausvaterliteratur
which encompassed in tlie latte r decades of the century both
husbandry and domestic morals. Of the latter groups, many of whom were actively
concerned to remedy abuses in the interests of more rational government or
husbandry and some of whom were actually familiar with the conditions of the
peasantry, few showed any tendency to idealize them. The lawyer von Beckendorff
expressed a widely-held belief among his kind when he wrote in his eight-volume
Oeconomiaforensis published in Berlin the same year as Voss's ie F reigelassenen
traditional custom and thus exacerbate social divisions within the peasant ranks. See
W.
von Groote, ie
Entstehmg des NationaHsm us in Nordw estdeutschland 1790-1840 (G o t t i n g e n , 1 9 5 5 ) , p . 1 0 5 . K o s e g a r t e n ' s
Jucunde (1805) incidentally offers an interesting contrast at a time when the function of literature of
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
11/13
EDA SAGARRA 8 9
Die Tugend und deren gliickliche Folgen, sind dem Bauemvoike bey ihrer Unwissenheit und
schlechten Erziehung, gemeiniglich eine unbekannte Sache, und es scheinet ihm die Aus-
ubung der Laster . . . weit angenehmer und vortheilhafter zu seyn. . . . Der Bauer h at fast
durchgehends ein fuhflosra Herz, wetches durch vemiinftige Vorsteilungen sehr schwer zu
bewegen und folgsam zu machen ist.**
Even Schlozer, scourge of tyrants, who laid the blame for the poor economic
performance of the pezisantry, and fbr their uncouth habits, on the shoulders of
unjust overlords, while rem inding
his
hearers and readers tha t 'Apathie ist Wirkung
der Sdaverey, kein Grund fur dieselbe', showed little inclination to idealize.*^ By
contrast, the image of
the
peasant which emerges from imaginative literature from
the time of Gessner onwards is uniformly sympathetic and positive. A broad
agreement
as to
the high m oral character and sympathetic mien of the peasant exists
across genres and generations. Such differences of emphasis as do exist are con-
cerned with the environment of the peasant. Even in extreme poverty and human
degradation, his hum anity remains unaffected, as is epitomized in Ho lty's poem of
1775, which later acquired the character of a folksong: 'Der alte Landmann an
seinen Sohn' ('U b imm er treu und Redlichkeit')
. Yet
although a num ber of writers
attack specific abuses and one or two build their fiction around contemporary
economic theory (as Merck does in
Herr Oheim ,
eighteenth-century Germ,an
literature of peasant life bears little real relation to contemporary peasant life or
agrarian problems. Nevertheless, to suggest that the literary topwi
oi tht frohlicher
Landmann
and of Nature versus Civilization determined the idealistic image of the
peasantry would be only partly true. For it is clear that such hterature had the
character of a cypher. In other w ords it stood for an ideal society, orderly yet free, in
which each
socia
element has its meaningful function. In their representation of the
peasant and his world, eighteenth-century German writers, the majority of burgher
or
Kleinbiirger
origin, present their bourgeois^* readers with a vision of society 'wie
ein Dichter davon traumen mag' (Kleist), in which all talents could
be
meaningfully
used, and one which was in clear contrast with the system under which they lived.
Belief in the rationality of man and in m an's powers to order the universe, a belief
which most of
these
writers shared, contrasted harshly with tbe actual practices of
society, and their own potential to change
it.
Here a Lessing could
be
humiliated by
the whims of a petty princeling or a Voss tricked by a highly-placed cleric who,
promising him a university scholarship, persuaded him to give up his source of
livelihood, and then as casually forgot all about
it.
But the selflessness and indeed
the ingenuity of bourgeois friends (compare Boie's efforts on Voss's behalf or the
support of Claudius's friends after the collapse of the
Wandsbecker
ole
in 1775) could
achieve what powerful patronage or 'the system' could not be depended on to do.
There
is a
parallel with the Utopian vision of the caring peasan t community, whether
of Swiss shepherds. Palatine nutgathere rs, or Bavarian farmers. The ideal society is
based on concern and skills, not on privilege, but needs the discerning vision of the
writer to discover it: such was the collective message of the literature of the peasant
^' Quoted in Wittmann , p. 166.
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
12/13
g o Literature of Peasant Life
life.
That i ts function was poii t icai throughout is made clear in the correspondence
or prefaces of i ts au tho rs, a p oint aptly i l lustrated by the case of Ge ssner, w ho wa s so
long regarded — and in the Dem ocrat ic Republ ic is s ti ll regarded — as an exam ple
of es ca pis t l i tera ture . I t is , however, true that only a mino rity of writers po ssessed
the p olitical w ill or self-confidence to endo w their view of th e pe as an t w orld w ith a
programmatic poli t ical character, of the kind that Schlozer outl ined in his riefe
us
Eichstadt 1785 and tha t gave him such infiuence over his studen ts:
Ein Schriftsteller ist ein unberufener, unbesoldeter Diener der burgeriichen Geseiischaft, ein
Volontair von Ratgeber der Na ti o n .. ..
o
haben die Britten ihre Contracte erhalten, und so
will (auch durch die SchHftsteller) will s Gott, in funfiig Jahren kein Leibeigener m ehr in
Deutschland sein. **
Bu t this is not peculiar to the li terature of pea san t life, but is pa rt of the m uc h m ore
fun da m en tal prob lem of the Ge rm an poe t s function in his society, and of his
perception of that function, both in the eighteenth century and later.
TRINITY CO LLEGE, DUBLIN
E D A
SAGARRA
Schlozer;
der Kaiser zugegei
Rosenberg, p. 369),
8/20/2019 Germany Peasant Life
13/13