8/8/2019 Grand Juries
1/99
Austin Citizens Grand Jury onAustin Citizens Grand Jury on
9/11 Crimes9/11 Crimes
Citizens Grand Juries:
The Shield and the Sword of the PeopleThe Cornerstone of our Constitution
The Fourth Branch of our Government,The Peoples Branch
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
2/99
A Note on Grand Juries by George J. Edwards,A Note on Grand Juries by George J. Edwards,
Harvard Law Review,Harvard Law Review, Vol 20, No. 8, June 1907Vol 20, No. 8, June 1907
The grand jury is an institution of English-speaking countries. It is of historic interest by
reason of the obscurity surrounding its origin, itsgradual development, and the part it has playedin some of the most stirring events in the historyof Anglo-Saxon countries;
it is of political interest by its protection of theliberty of the individual from the arbitrary powerof the government;
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
3/99
A Note on Grand Juries by George J. Edwards,A Note on Grand Juries by George J. Edwards,
Harvard Law Review,Harvard Law Review, Vol 20, No. 8, June 1907Vol 20, No. 8, June 1907
It is of legal interest in that its power and action isutterly repugnant to "the experience and theory
of English law." It has been extravagantly praised as the "security
of Englishmen's lives," the conserver of hisliberties, and the noblest check upon the maliceand oppression of individuals;
it has been bitterly assailed as "purelymischievous" and a "relic of barbarism."
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
4/99
Project Goals
Project Goals
Indict and Prosecute the criminals responsible for9/11
Restore Grand Juries power to protect thepeople from unfounded & harassing prosecutionby the state
Restore Grand Juries presentment power andthe peoples power to initiate and take overcriminal prosecution when state prosecutorseither refuse to prosecute or prosecute poorly
Restore the peoples right to elect Grand Jurieshave them recognized by the Courts
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
5/99
Project Goals
Project Goals
Restore the publics access to existing impaneledgrand juries so the people can bring evidence of
crimes to these grand juries for consideration Exercise our right to form our own grand juries to
investigate crimes & present charges, especiallyconcerning the crimes of 9/11
Publicize our presentments and findings in themedia to educate the public about 9/11 truth andto increase pressure on Congress and the JusticeDepartment to thoroughly investigate the crimesof 9/11 and prosecute those responsible
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
6/99
Outline of Topics
Outline of Topics
Grand Juries: Their purpose and function as theshield and the sword of the people
The Magna Carta: Grand Juries are born inEngland in 1215
Grand Juries become well - established inEngland from 1215-1600s
Grand Juries in pre-revolutionary America:The Golden Years of Grand Juries power andthe crucial function they served in our Revolution
Grand Juries power continues in early post-revolutionary America
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
7/99
Outline of Topics
Outline of Topics
The imperative role of private prosecution
The decline of grand juries power starting in the
mid-1800s and the 1946 Procedure Code 2 modern cases highlighting the importance of grand
juries power in bringing a halt to govt corruption
Recent Supreme Court rulings reviving grand juries
power and function Reform to restore proper grand jury function
Citizens Grand Juries - return to historic precedent
Media pressure needed today for the 9/11 Citizens
Grand Juries to have a serious impact
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
8/99
Grand Juries: The Cornerstone ofOurGrand Juries: The Cornerstone ofOur
ConstitutionConstitution
The grand jury is the cornerstone of ourConstitution. When it operates as it was designedby the Framers of the Constitution, the Bill ofRights cannot be infringed upon by thegovernment.
Mike Brown, Information for Good Citizenship,
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~dlaw70
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
9/99
Grand Juries: The Cornerstone ofOurGrand Juries: The Cornerstone ofOur
ConstitutionConstitution
When it acts as a rubber stamp for theprosecutor, the Bill of Rights are seriouslyundermined.
By educating those called to be grand jurors, wecan begin to reclaim those rights taken away bythe federal judiciary.
Mike Brown, Information for Good Citizenship,
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~dlaw70
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
10/99
As a shield, grand juries protect the people fromharassing and capricious prosecution by abusive
and overreaching power of the executive branch. In order for anyone to be prosecuted for an
infamous or capital crime, a grand jury mustdetermine that there is sufficient evidence to bringthe accused to trial.
Grand Juries: The Shield of the PeopleGrand Juries: The Shield of the People
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
11/99
Grand Juries: The Shield of the PeopleGrand Juries: The Shield of the People
Historically, this protection was mainly put inplace to prevent the state from railroading people
into jail or long and expensive court ordealssimply for being political dissidents or fordisagreeing with the state.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
12/99
Grand Jury Shield: The Fifth AmendmentGrand Jury Shield: The Fifth Amendment
of the U.S. Constitutionof the U.S. Constitution
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, orotherwise infamous crime, unless on a
presentment or indictment of a grand jury, exceptin cases arising in the land or naval forces, or inthe militia, when in actual service in time of waror public danger; nor shall any person be subjectfor the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy
of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in anycriminal case to be a witness against himself, norbe deprived of life, liberty, or property, withoutdue process of law; nor shall private property betaken for public use, without just compensation.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
13/99
True Bill orNo Bill of IndictmentTrue Bill orNo Bill of Indictment
A grand jury votes on a set of proposed chargessubmitted by a prosecutor and can return charges in
either of two ways. If the grand jurors decide there is probable cause to
support the charges, they vote a "true bill," that is,they vote to return the indictment and initiate acriminal proceeding.
If the grand jurors decide there is not probable causeto support the charges, they vote a "no true bill,"which means the indictment is not returned and nocriminal case ensues.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
14/99
Grand Juries: The Sword of the PeopleGrand Juries: The Sword of the People
The original name for a grand jury was The GrandInquisition.
As a sword, grand juries act as an accusatory andinvestigative body, mainly into govt corruption.
GJs may independently investigate corruption apartfrom a state prosecutor.
GJs may conduct proceedings in secret and canquestion witnesses and examine physical evidence.
GJs may submit criminal charges and other findingsaccording to their own knowledge and independentinvestigation. This is called a presentment.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
15/99
Grand Juries: The Sword of the PeopleGrand Juries: The Sword of the People
Grand juries NEVER consider any evidencewhatsoever that may support the innocence of the
accused. It does not matter one iota if there are mountains of
evidence to support the innocence of the accused.
Grand juries ONLY look at accusatory evidence.
If there is enough accusatory evidence to supportprobable cause, that is all that is needed for thegrand jury to hand down an indictment orpresentment. Any evidence to support someone'sinnocence is considered by the trial jury, or the
petit jury, during the criminal trial.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
16/99
Grand Juries: The Sword of the People &Grand Juries: The Sword of the People &
the 7th Amendmentthe 7th Amendment
The 7th Amendment guarantees us all rightsestablished through common law.
Common law developed under the inquisitorialsystem in England (the Grand Jury system) fromjudicial decisions based on custom, tradition,precedent, and a history of jurisprudence.
The right and power of grand juries to makepresentments to initiate prosecution has beenwell established through centuries ofjurisprudence through common law, thereforethis right is retained and protected in the 7th
Amendment of our Constitution.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
17/99
The Seventh Amendment ofOur U.S.The Seventh Amendment ofOur U.S.
ConstitutionConstitution
In suits at common law, where the value incontroversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the rightof trial by jury shall be preserved, and no facttried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined inany court of the United States, than according tothe rules of the common law.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
18/99
A Note about Common Law, the 7thA Note about Common Law, the 7th
Amendment, and 9/11Amendment, and 9/11
Common law jurisdiction includes criminal casesas well as civil cases.
Common law deals with property rights. Most crimes involve a controversy which
exceeds twenty dollars.
The crimes of 9/11 certainly inflicted propertydamage exceeding twenty dollars.
We are well within our Constitutional rights topursue criminal grand jury investigationregarding the crimes of 9/11.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
19/99
Grand Juries: The Fourth Branch ofGrand Juries: The Fourth Branch of
Government, the Peoples BranchGovernment, the Peoples Branch
It is significant that the grand jury is not part ofany of the three branches of the U.S. government- it is a pre-constitutional institution.
In the mid-1800s Washington attorney John H.Clarke wrote in a motion to the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of Columbia,Although today the grand jury is more of a
prosecutors panel, it is still a pre-constitutionalinstitution,
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
20/99
Grand Juries: The Fourth Branch ofGrand Juries: The Fourth Branch of
Government, the Peoples BranchGovernment, the Peoples Branch
and is still a peoples panel, not captive orrelegated by the constitution to a position withinany branches And it still serves as a vehicle foreffective citizen participation in government.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
21/99
Grand Juries: The Fourth Branch ofGrand Juries: The Fourth Branch of
Government, the Peoples BranchGovernment, the Peoples Branch
Citizens often mistakenly believe that becausethe grand jury meets at the courthouse it is underthe judiciary or because the grand jury meetswith a prosecutor it is under the executivebranch.
It is actually an independent institution adoptedby the founders to protect the individual from
prosecutorial misconduct, as well as to empowerthe people to initiate and pursue prosecution.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
22/99
Grand Juries: The Fourth Branch ofGrand Juries: The Fourth Branch of
Government, the Peoples BranchGovernment, the Peoples Branch
Antonin Scalia effectively codified the uniqueindependent power of the Fourth Branch into thehands of all citizens sitting as grand jurors,including those sitting as federal grand jurors.
In discussing that power and uniqueindependence granted to the grand jury, theUnited States Supreme Court, in United States v.
Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992), Justice Scalia,delivering the opinion of the Court, laid down thelaw of the land:
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
23/99
Justice Scalia delivers the opinion of theJustice Scalia delivers the opinion of the
Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992
"'[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo-Americanhistory," Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490(1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), thegrand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, butnot in the body of the Constitution. It has notbeen textually assigned, therefore, to any of thebranches described in the first three Articles. It
"`is a constitutional fixture in its own right.'"United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312(CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App.D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)),cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 (1977). ' "
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
24/99
Justice Scalia delivers the opinion of theJustice Scalia delivers the opinion of the
Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992
Scalia also stated, that "the grand jury is aninstitution separate from the courts, over whosefunctioning the courts do not preside..." Id.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
25/99
Justice Scalia delivers the opinion of theJustice Scalia delivers the opinion of the
Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992
"In fact, the whole theory of its function is that itbelongs to no branch of the institutionalGovernment, serving as a kind of buffer orreferee between the Government and the people.See Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 218(1960); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 61 (1906); G.Edwards, The Grand Jury 28-32 (1906).
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
26/99
Justice Scalia delivers the opinion of theJustice Scalia delivers the opinion of the
Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992Court in U.S. v. Williams, 1992
Although the grand jury normally operates, ofcourse, in the courthouse and under judicialauspices, its institutional relationship with theJudicial Branch has traditionally been, so tospeak, at arm's length. Judges' directinvolvement in the functioning of the grand juryhas generally been confined to the constitutive
one of calling the grand jurors together andadministering their oaths of office. See UnitedStates v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974);Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 6(a). [504 U.S. 36, 48] "
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
27/99
Treasongate: Grand Juries, The Fourth Branch ofTreasongate: Grand Juries, The Fourth Branch of
Government, by CitizenSpook, August 14, 2005Government, by CitizenSpook, August 14, 2005
I submit to you that this passage sets the stagefor a revolutionary new context necessary andConstitutionally mandated to We the People",THE FOURTH BRANCH of the Government of theUnited States.
Besides the Legislative, Executive, and Judicialbranches, I submit that there is a fourth branch,
THE GRAND JURY, and We the People whensitting as grand jurors, are, as Scalia quoted inUS v. Williams, a constitutional fixture in ourown right. That is exactly what the grand jury is,
and what it was always intended to be.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
28/99
Treasongate: Grand Juries, The Fourth Branch ofTreasongate: Grand Juries, The Fourth Branch of
Government, by CitizenSpook, August 14, 2005Government, by CitizenSpook, August 14, 2005
We the people have been charged with oversightof the government in our roles as grand jurors.
And at this critical time in American history, wemust, for the protection of our ConstitutionalRepublic, take back our power and start acting aspowerful as the other branches of government.
The law is on our side. We the people have theright and power under the 5th and 7thAmendments of the Constitution to charge thisgovernment with crimes by returningpresentments regardless of whether the US
Attorneys or the federal judges agree with us.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
29/99
If Its not a Runaway, its not a real grand juryIf Its not a Runaway, its not a real grand jury --
Roger Roots, Creighton Law Review, Vol 3Roger Roots, Creighton Law Review, Vol 3
No. 4, 1999No. 4, 1999
A "runaway" grand jury, loosely defined as agrand jury which resists the accusatory choicesof a government prosecutor.
Today's "runaway" grand jury is in fact thecommon law grand jury of the past.
Prior to the emergence of governmental
prosecution as the standard model of Americancriminal justice, all grand juries were in fact"runaways," according to the definition ofmodern times.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
30/99
If Its not a Runaway, its not a real grand juryIf Its not a Runaway, its not a real grand jury --
Roger Roots, Creighton Law Review, Vol 3Roger Roots, Creighton Law Review, Vol 3
No. 4, 1999No. 4, 1999
they operated as completely independent, self-directing bodies of inquisitors, with power topursue unlawful conduct to its very source,including the government itself.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
31/99
The Grand Jury: Its Origin, History andThe Grand Jury: Its Origin, History and
DevelopmentDevelopment -- George J. Edwards, 1906George J. Edwards, 1906
The origin of the grand jury has given rise to muchdiscussion among legal scholars. Numerous andwidely differing conclusions have been offered.
Some have claimed to find traces of the institutionamong the Athenians. But if such an institution everexisted in Athens it had become extinct before theexistence of Britain became known to the
Mediterranean Countries.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
32/99
The Grand Jury: Its Origin, History andThe Grand Jury: Its Origin, History and
DevelopmentDevelopment -- George J. Edwards, 1906George J. Edwards, 1906
Athenian history does mention practices similar tothe Normans tradition of trial by a large number ofjurors, however there is nothing in Athenian historythat mentions an accusatory body of citizens.
Some writers claim the institution has an Anglo-Saxon origin, others urge that juries were unknownto the Anglo-Saxons and were introduced by the
Normans after their Conquest of England in 1066.
The Magna Carta is the first major historicaldocument enumerating an accusatory body of thepeople.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
33/99
The Magna Carta, the precursor ofThe Magna Carta, the precursor of
our Constitutionour Constitution King John (1199-1216) succeeded his brother
Richard I. He lacked his brothers militaryprowess and he spent much of his reignattempting to recover lost English possessions inFrance. To finance his military campaigns, heresorted to harsh taxation of his subjects, whichprovoked growing unrest.
The Battle of Bouvines in July 1214 marked theend of English hopes of regaining Normandy.Opposition to King John intensified, and he wasno longer able to resist the barons demand that
their liberties be confirmed.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
34/99
The Magna Carta, the precursor ofThe Magna Carta, the precursor of
our Constitutionour Constitution Abuses by King John caused a revolt by barons
who forced him to sign and enact this recognitionof rights for both noblemen and ordinaryEnglishmen. It established the principle that noone, including the king or a lawmaker, is abovethe law.
On June 10, 1215, the barons took London by
force with their militias and forced King John toeither sign the document or loose his head at theRiver Thames. In return the barons renewed theiroaths of fealty, or allegiance, to the king.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
35/99
The Magna Carta, the precursor ofThe Magna Carta, the precursor of
our Constitutionour Constitution The constitutional importance of Magna Carta lies
in the fact that it placed limits upon the absolutepower of the King and made him subject to thelaw.
The most famous of its sixty-three clauses saidthat no free man could be imprisoned, outlawed,or exiled except by the lawful judgement of his
peers, and that justice could not be sold, delayedor denied.
It also contained clauses relating to the treatmentof heirs and widows and to the payment of debts.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
36/99
The Magna Carta, the precursor ofThe Magna Carta, the precursor of
our Constitutionour Constitution It provided for uniform measures of wine, ale,
corn and cloth throughout the realm.
It confirmed the liberties of the Church. It sought to regulate the conduct of all local
officials such as sheriffs, bailiffs, and constables,and to ensure that they knew and observed thelaw.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
37/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
The most significant clause forKing John at thetime was clause 61, known as the "securityclause", the longest portion of the document.
This established a committee of 25 barons whocould at any time meet and over-rule the will ofthe King, through force by seizing his castles andpossessions if needed.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
38/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
This was based on a medieval legal practiceknown as distraint, which was commonly done,but it was the first time it had been applied to amonarch. In addition, the King was to take anoath of loyalty to the committee.
In English law, distraintordistress, is a remedyfor non-payment of rent. It involves the seizure of
goods belonging to the tenant by the landlord tosell them for the payment of the rent.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
39/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
Using the practice of distraint as the foundingprinciple of the Magna Carta is of significantimportance. The barons asserted their right toseize the kings possessions and overrule theking in the event that the king would not makeredress of grievances to the people.
This set the precedent that the king as a ruler is a
mere tenant, and that the king owed payment tothe people in the form of redress of grievances inreturn for the people allowing him to rule. Ifredress is not made, the people have the right toseize his possessions as payment.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
40/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
Up until this time, the right of the monarch to rulewas considered absolute and unconditional. Now,the barons asserted that the kings rulingauthority was not an inherent right but rather aprivilege granted by the people, that could berevoked by the people, and furthermore aprivilege that required payment to the people in
the form of redress of grievances. If payment was not made, the people had the right
to evict the king from his ruling position as wellas seize all the kings possessions in lieu ofpayment of redress of grievances.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
41/99
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
42/99
The Magna Carta, the precursor ofThe Magna Carta, the precursor of
our Constitutionour Constitution The proper principle was established that it is
We the people who are the landlords andowners of the governmental positions ofauthority, the We the people grant the privilegeof authority to the tenants of these governmentpositions, this privilege can be revoked for non-payment of redress of grievance, our tenants
can be evicted from their positions, paymentseized by confiscation of our tenants materialpossessions, and most importantly it is theliberties and rights of the people that areinherent and in-alienable.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
43/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGSFOR GOD, for the better ordering of our kingdom,and to allay the discord that has arisen betweenus and our barons, and since we desire that theyshall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lastingstrength, for ever, we give and grant to thebarons the following security:
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
44/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
The barons shall elect twenty-five of theirnumber to keep, and cause to be observed withall their might, the peace and liberties grantedand confirmed to them by this charter.
If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of ourservants offend in any respect against any man,or transgress any of the articles of the peace or
of this security, and the offence is made known tofour of the said twenty-five barons, they shallcome to us - or in our absence from the kingdomto the chief justice - to declare it and claimimmediate redress.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
45/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice,make no redress within forty days, reckoningfrom the day on which the offence was declaredto us or to him, the four barons shall refer thematter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, whomay distrain upon and assail us in every waypossible,
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
46/99
The Magna Carta, Article 61: The FirstThe Magna Carta, Article 61: The First
Accusatory Body of the PeopleAccusatory Body of the People
with the support of the whole community of theland, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions,or anything else saving only our own person andthose of the queen and our children, until theyhave secured such redress as they havedetermined upon. Having secured the redress,they may then resume their normal obedience to
us.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
47/99
A Side Note: The Invisible GovernmentA Side Note: The Invisible Government
SpeaksSpeaks
King John had been forced to agree to the MagnaCarta, and he immediately attempted to have itannulled by the Pope, who issued a papal bullsaying that it was as unjust and unlawful as it isbase and shameful.
Pope Innocent III annulled the "shameful anddemeaning agreement, forced upon the king by
violence and fear." He rejected any call for rights,saying it impaired King John's dignity. He saw itas an affront to the Church's authority over theking and released John from his oath to obey it.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
48/99
Civil War EnsuesCivil War Ensues
King John had no intention to honour Magna Carta,as it was sealed under extortion by force, andclause 61 essentially neutered his power as amonarch, making him King in name only. Herenounced it as soon as the barons left London,plunging England into a civil war, called the FirstBarons War.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
49/99
Grand Juries are a SecondGrand Juries are a Second
Amendment IssueAmendment Issue -- Michael BadnarikMichael Badnarik The only reason the barons were able to assert and
enforce their rights was because they were armedand the king had squandered his army onimperialistic and unsuccessful war campaigns.
The only reason we havent had all our rights takenaway is because we have the right to bear arms.
We have the power to exercise and enforce our
rights only as long as we can defend ourselves.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
50/99
Grand Juries are a SecondGrand Juries are a Second
Amendment IssueAmendment Issue -- Michael BadnarikMichael Badnarik Historically, one of the first things that tyrannical
dictators have done as soon as they gain power isto disarm the people. Once the populace isdisarmed, these tyrants can easily take awaypeoples rights & liberties, install a police state, andbegin the process of genocide.
The second amendment was mainly put in place to
protect the people from abusive and tyrannicalgovernment taking away not only our rights andliberties but our very lives as well.
Self-defense from common street criminals is
secondary to this principle.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
51/99
Development of the Grand JuryDevelopment of the Grand Jury
from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906
In England during the late 1200s & early 1300s,the court & the sheriffs established the practice ofimpaneling accusing bodies known as inquests or
juries.
For every group of 100 people, 4-16 people weresummoned by the court bailiffs to be accusers andpresent offences occurring within that hundred.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
52/99
Development of the Grand JuryDevelopment of the Grand Jury
from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906
This practice was established because the kingfelt there was not a sufficient constabulary andmore surveillance was needed over the
population.
The king felt there were too many people and toofew sheriffs & deputies to monitor the population,so the people were conscripted to be snitches.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
53/99
Development of the Grand JuryDevelopment of the Grand Jury
from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906
These inquest juries of the 100s were impaneledto be an arm of the central government, acting as apublic prosecutor for the purpose of ferreting out
crime.
The members of the inquestwere at all timesbound to inform the court either singly orcollectively their reasons for arriving at their
verdict and the evidence upon which it was based.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
54/99
Development of the Grand JuryDevelopment of the Grand Jury
from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906from George J. Edwards, The Grand Jury, 1906
These inquest juries reported to the courtevidence of crimes based on personalknowledge. The court had the power to
interrogate the inquest juries concerning theirknowledge and as to how they arrived at theirpresentments.
These inquest juries were conscripted tattlers.
If offences were not reported, the jurors would beheavily penalized.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
55/99
The Grand Jury Officially defined in 1368The Grand Jury Officially defined in 1368
Due to increasing population over time, the inquestjuries of the 100s became impractical.
In 1368, during the reign of Edward III, the sheriffsbegan to expand the proceedings of the inquestjuries to investigate and present offences for theentire county at large.
The number of jurors for each county inquestwasincreased to 24.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
56/99
The Grand Jury Officially defined in 1368The Grand Jury Officially defined in 1368
This body received the name le graunde inquest,which means the grand inquisition.
This is the first official reference of the grandjury.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
57/99
The Grand Jury starts to gainThe Grand Jury starts to gain
independenceindependence When the grand inquestwas established to
investigate and present for the entire county, thejurors personal knowledge of the facts in most
cases became more limited.
Hence, the practice of juror interrogation andrequiring the grand inquestto divulge to the courttheir knowledge and reasons upon which their
presentment was based began to fall into disuse.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
58/99
The beginning of Grand JuriesThe beginning of Grand Juries
secrecysecrecy Because the grand inquests presented crimes for
the entire county, the monarchy became moreconcerned that the actions of the grande inquests
might become known to the accused andtherefore would allow for the defendants escape.
The inquests were then sworn under oath to keeptheir proceedings secret.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
59/99
The Grand Jurors OathThe Grand Jurors Oath
"that they will lawful presentment make of suchchapters as shall be delivered to them in writingand in this they will not fail for any love, hatred,
fear, reward, or promise, and that they willconceal the secrets, so help them God and theSaints."
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
60/99
Development of the Grand JuryDevelopment of the Grand Jury
With the arrival of the grand inquestto inquireand present for the county at large, combinedwith the disappearance of the accusing bodies of
the hundreds, we practically complete what maybe termed the period of formation in thedevelopment of the grand jury.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
61/99
The independence of the Grand JuryThe independence of the Grand Jury
becomes establishedbecomes established
It was in this period that the independence of thegrand jury became established. Grand juries wereno longer required to make known to the court
the evidence upon which they acted nor thereasons for their conclusions.
They met in secret and were sworn to keep theirproceedings secret by an oath which contained
no reservation in favor of the government.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
62/99
The independence of the Grand JuryThe independence of the Grand Jury
becomes establishedbecomes established
The three centuries that followed documentsgrand juries freedom of action from all restraintby the court.
The independence which the institution hadattained would be put to severe tests.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
63/99
The independence of the Grand JuryThe independence of the Grand Jury
becomes establishedbecomes established
However, since grand juries were protected bythe cloak of secrecy and free from the control ofthe court concerning their findings, they
successfully thwarted the unjust designs of thecorrupt monarchical government.
The Grand Jury: Its Origin,History, and Development-
George J. Edwards, 1906
FOR MORE INFO...
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
64/99
The independence of the Grand JuryThe independence of the Grand Jury
becomes establishedbecomes established
By the 1600s, grand juries were stronglyasserting their independence and beganfunctioning as the peoples shield from the
crowns abusive prosecution against politicaldissidents.
It was in the reign of Charles the Second that wefind the two most celebrated instances of the
fearless action of the grand jury in defending theliberty of the individual, although subjected to thestrongest possible pressure from the crown.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
65/99
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
66/99
The Case of Stephen College, a religiousThe Case of Stephen College, a religious
and political dissidentand political dissident
The grand jury then demanded that the witnesses besent to them that they might examine them privately.After considering the matter for several hours the
grand jury ignored the bill.
Upon being asked by the Lord Chief Justice to givea reason for this verdict, they replied that they hadgiven their verdict according to their consciences
and would stand by it. The jurors exercised their right of secrecy of
deliberations and refused to be interrogated by thecourt concerning their findings.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
67/99
The Case of Stephen College, a religiousThe Case of Stephen College, a religious
and political dissidentand political dissident
The foreman of this grand jury, Mr. Wilmore, wasafterwards apprehended upon a false charge,examined before the Council, sent to the tower, and
afterward forced to flee beyond the seas.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
68/99
The Case of Anthony Cooper, the Earl ofThe Case of Anthony Cooper, the Earl of
Shaftesbury, a religious & political dissidentShaftesbury, a religious & political dissident
During the mid 1600s, Anthony Cooper, the Earl ofShaftesbury, was a member of Parliament andsupported a strong Parliament as well as religious
tolerance.
He became suspicious of the king's efforts toimprove the position of Roman Catholics.
Cooper opposed the king and sided with theParliamentarians in the English Civil Wars of themid 1600s.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
69/99
The Case of Anthony Cooper, the Earl ofThe Case of Anthony Cooper, the Earl of
Shaftesbury, a religious & political dissidentShaftesbury, a religious & political dissident In 1681, the same year as the College case, an
attempt was made to indict Cooper for high treason.
As in College's case, the grand jury desired to hearthe evidence in private, as was standard procedure,but the king's counsel insisted that the evidence beheard in open court and Lord Chief JusticePemberton assented.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
70/99
The Case of Anthony Cooper, the Earl ofThe Case of Anthony Cooper, the Earl of
Shaftesbury, a religious & political dissidentShaftesbury, a religious & political dissident Just as in the Stephen College case, after hearing
the evidence in open court the grand jury desiredthat they might examine the witnesses privately in
their chamber and the court granted the request.
After again hearing the witnesses and consideringtheir verdict they returned the bill "ignoramus,"upon which "the people fell a hollowing and a
shouting.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
71/99
King Charles unsuccessfully tries toKing Charles unsuccessfully tries to
retaliateretaliate Because of the failure of the king to coerce grand
juries to his oppressive purpose, the king'sofficials sought a method whereby justice might
be served with results more agreeable to theirroyal master.
A statute was enacted empowering judges andjustices to reform grand jury panels by taking
out the names of improper persons and puttingin others according to their discretion.
The sheriff was then to be required to return thepanel as reformed by the court.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
72/99
King Charles unsuccessfully tries toKing Charles unsuccessfully tries to
retaliateretaliate The crowns excuse for this statute was an
alleged abuse of power by the sheriffs regardingthe selection and returning of grand jurors.
They accused the sheriffs of packing the panelswith those who would carry out any allegednefarious designs of the sheriffs.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
73/99
King Charles unsuccessfully tries toKing Charles unsuccessfully tries to
retaliateretaliate Through this statute, Sir Robert Sawyer, the
attorney general, sought to employ to carry outthe wishes of the crown.
The Court of Sessions endeavored to compel thesheriffs to return the panels as they directed, butthe sheriffs refused.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
74/99
The independence of the Grand JuryThe independence of the Grand Jury
becomes establishedbecomes established Grand Juries rule of secrecy allowed them to
function out of the sight of the King's prosecutorsor other meddlers.
It was their secrecy that provided the grand jurieswith their greatest power as an independentpopulist body, equipped with oversight power onthe government.
They were a group of people who stood as acheck on government, often in direct oppositionto the desires of those in power.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
75/99
Grand Juries are Brought to AmericaGrand Juries are Brought to America
When the settlement of America was begun byEnglishmen, they brought with them all the civilrights which they enjoyed in their native land, and
with them came the grand jury.
The Grand Juries became one of the fundamentalfoundations of common law in the Americancolonies and is the oldest institution in Americas
criminal justice system. Grand Juries quickly became vehicles for popular
anti-monarchical ideology for the Englishcolonists in America.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
76/99
Grand Juries gain more strength andGrand Juries gain more strength and
independenceindependence In the early American experience, the grand jury
became more a part of local government than ithad ever been in England.
A grand jury in Virginia in 1662 would meet twotimes a year "to levy taxes and oversee spending,supervise public works, appoint local officials,and consider criminal accusations.
Connecticut grand juries were elected and werelevying taxes and conducting local governmentwork by the middle of the 1700s.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
77/99
Grand Juries gain more strength andGrand Juries gain more strength and
independenceindependence In many colonies, grand jurors gathered "from all
the several Parts of the County to represent theState.
Pre-revolutionary writers similarly spoke of grand
juries as representative bodies.
The New York WeeklyJournalstated in 1734:
"Does not the grand jury (tho' chose by theSheriff) represent the county? In a manner ofspeaking, yes: grand jurymen represented not agroup of constituents, but local knowledge.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
78/99
Grand Juries gain more strength andGrand Juries gain more strength and
independenceindependence The grand jury was the initiatorof prosecutions,
acting "in several of the colonies as spokesmenfor the people . . . and [as] vehicles for complaints
against officialdom."
in America, the grand jury originally began as adefense against the monarchy, and became muchmore independent than the English grand jury of
the 1600s. American grand juries initiated prosecutions
against corrupt agents of the British government,often in response to complaints from individuals.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
79/99
Grand Juries crucial role in theGrand Juries crucial role in the
American RevolutionAmerican Revolution In pre-Revolutionary America, grand juries took
on a life of their own.
The grand jury that the drafters of the Bill ofRights knew was much more powerful than anyknown in England.
The actions of grand juries figured prominently inthe beginnings of the Revolution.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
80/99
Grand Juries crucial role in theGrand Juries crucial role in the
American RevolutionAmerican Revolution In 1765, a Boston grand jury refused to indict
Colonists who had led riots against the Stamp Act.
A Philadelphia Grand Jury condemned the use ofthe tea tax to compensate British officials,encouraged a rejection of all British goods, andcalled for organization with other colonies todemand redress of grievances.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
81/99
Grand Juries crucial role in theGrand Juries crucial role in the
American RevolutionAmerican Revolution A Boston Grand Jury in 1769 indicted British
soldiers for alleged crimes of breaking andentering private homes of citizens.
Grand Juries refused to indict certain colonistswho had been charged by the British authoritiesfor inciting desertion and other alleged crimesagainst the king.
Grand Juries indicted for treason anyone whojoined or colluded with the British army.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
82/99
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
83/99
Grand Juries crucial role in theGrand Juries crucial role in the
American RevolutionAmerican Revolution The public proclamations of these grand juries
were drastically different from anything we knowtoday.
They were often circulated in local and nationalnewspapers in an effort to "fuel the revolutionaryfire."
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
84/99
Grand Juries in early America protectGrand Juries in early America protect
Aaron Burr from false charges of treasonAaron Burr from false charges of treason Aaron Burr was targeted by the federal
government in the early 1800s.
After a bizarre political career, Burr was dislikedby both the Federalists and Republicans.
The U.S. Attorney forKentucky, a staunchFederalist aligned with President Jefferson,moved that a grand jury be summoned to
consider charges against Burr for his allegedattempt to involve the United States in a war withSpain.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
85/99
Grand Juries in early America protectGrand Juries in early America protect
Aaron Burr from false charges of treasonAaron Burr from false charges of treason This grand jury from Republican-dominatedKentucky returned an "ignoramus bill," decliningto indict Burr on the evidence.
Going even further, the grand jury issued awritten declaration in its presentment directed tothe court in which they declared that Burr failedto exhibit "any design inimical to the peace and
well-being of the country."
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
86/99
Grand Juries in early America protectGrand Juries in early America protect
Aaron Burr from false charges of treasonAaron Burr from false charges of treason A second grand jury proceeding convened in
Mississippi Territory to consider similar treasoncharges against Burr relating to his expedition
down the Mississippi River.
It was alleged that Burr intended to capture NewOrleans, a city of nine thousand people protectedby a thousand United States soldiers, using sixty
unarmedmen in ten boats.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
87/99
Grand Juries in early America protectGrand Juries in early America protect
Aaron Burr from false charges of treasonAaron Burr from false charges of treason The Mississippi grand jury not only declined to
indict Burr in the affair, but returnedpresentments which clearly labeled the
government's attempted charges as a vindictiveprosecution.
The presentment concluded that "Aaron Burrhasnot been guiltyof anycrime or misdemeanor
against the laws of the United States or of thisTerritory."
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
88/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption Furthermore, the grand jury declared that the
arrests of Burr and his co-travelers had beenmade without warrant, and . . . without other
lawful authority, and represented a grievancedestructive of personal liberty.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
89/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption In resounding condemnation, the grand jury
pronounced its regret that the enemies of ourglorious Constitution had rejoiced at the
attempted persecution of Aaron Burr andexpressed the opinion that such prosecutorialmisconduct must sap the vitals of our politicalexistence, and crumble this glorious fabric in thedust.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
90/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption The grand jury's presentment power was used
not only to accuse wrongdoers when governmentprosecutors refused to do so, but to publicly
declare the innocence of a targeted suspect in thevery face of opposition by the prosecution.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
91/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption The Mississippi grand jury was a "runaway" by
today's standards.
Yet a grand jury acting in such way offered
precisely the type of protection envisioned bythe Framers when they included the institution inthe Bill of Rights as a check on the power of thegovernment.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
92/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption The Mississippi grand jury's presentment
included a bold attackon the prosecution itself an occurrence scarcely imaginable today.
It was the grand jury's power overitspresentments, rather than its indictments, thatmade it so fearsome.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
93/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption The effectiveness of early American grand juries
in ferreting out the shortcomings of publicofficials can be gauged from the long lists of
grand jury presentments of early America.
"Very little escaped the attention of the grandjurymen, which even took notice of the failuresof town councils to provide stocks or a whipping
post to punish offenders.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
94/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption Throughout the 19th century, grand juries often
acted on their own initiative in the face of directopposition from a district attorney.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
95/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption An independently acting grand jury probed and
"toppled the notorious Boss Tweed and hiscronies" in New York City in 1872.
Without the prosecutor's assistance, the Tweedgrand jury independently carried out its owninvestigation in a district that had otherwise beenvery loyal to Tweed.
The media played a crucial role in this case. TheNYT highly publicized the case despite beingoffered $5 million to keep quiet.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
96/99
Grand Juries in early AmericaGrand Juries in early America
expose political corruptionexpose political corruption In 1902, a Minneapolis grand jury on its own
initiative hired private detectives and collectedenough evidence to indict the mayor and force
the police chief to resign.
This grand jury virtually governed the city until anew administration could be hired.
In 1907 in San Francisco, a grand jury indicted
the mayor and replaced him.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
97/99
The Imperative Role ofPrivateThe Imperative Role ofPrivate
ProsecutionProsecution In England every private person had the same
rights as the Attorney General to initiate aprosecution.
Once a case had been presented to the grandjury, it was entirely out of the prosecutor's hands.
In the early days of our Republic "prosecutor"was simply anyone who voluntarily went before
the grand jury with a complaint.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
98/99
The Imperative Role ofPrivateThe Imperative Role ofPrivate
ProsecutionProsecution Until 1853 there was nowhere general organized
control of Federal prosecution.
The Department of Justice was not created untilJune 22, 1870. At the time the only authority theJustice Department had was to investigate postalcrimes and compile crime statistics.
Even in 1897 private citizens could still have
arrest warrants issued.
At that time grand jurors themselves were theonly ones competent to ascertain who was theprosecutor.
8/8/2019 Grand Juries
99/99
The Imperative Role ofPrivateThe Imperative Role ofPrivate
ProsecutionProsecution The rise of the "public prosecutor," both at the
federal and state levels, has drastically alteredgrand jury function.
Of 448 cases examined in 1838, there were 80 "no
bills."
In 1976 there were 23,000 federal indictmentsreturned but only 123 no bills.