+ All Categories
Transcript
  • Harmonic Balance Method forUnsteady Periodic Flows

    Gregor Cvijetić1, Hrvoje Jasak1,21Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia,

    2Wikki Ltd, United [email protected] [email protected],

    [email protected]

    Abstract

    This work presents the Harmonic Balance methodfor incompressible non-linear periodic flows. Themethod is implemented and tested in foam-extend, a fork of the open source software Open-FOAM. Simulation results for passive scalar trans-port and NACA 2412 are presented and com-pared with a conventional transient simulation.Harmonic Balance for passive scalar transport isvalidated on four cases with simple harmonic andsquare waves. The Harmonic Balance Navier-Stokes solver is validated using NACA 2412 testcase in 2-D and 3-D.

    1. Introduction

    Harmonic Balance method is a quasi-steady statemethod developed for simulating non-linear tem-porally periodic flows. It is based on assumptionthat each primitive variable can be accurately pre-sented by a Fourier series in time, using first n har-monics and the mean value. Such assumptionsare used to replace the time derivative term withcoupled source terms, transforming the transientequations into a set of coupled steady state equa-tions. The improvement over steady-state meth-ods is that Harmonic Balance is able to describethe transient effects of a periodic flow without longtime-domain simulations.

    2. Mathematical Model

    Primitive variables are expressed by a Fourier se-ries in time, with n harmonics. Substituting thevariables in transport equations with Fourier se-ries, 2n + 1 coupled equations are obtained:

    •Harmonic Balance momentum equation:

    ∇•(utjutj)−∇•(γ∇utj) = −2ω

    2n + 1

    2n∑i=1

    P(i−j)uti

    ,•Harmonic Balance scalar transport equation:

    ∇•(uQtj)−∇•(γ∇Qtj) = −2ω

    2n + 1

    2n∑i=1

    P(i−j)Qti

    ,•Harmonic Balance pressure equation:

    ∇•(

    1

    aP∇ptj

    )= ∇•

    (H(utj)aP

    )=∑f

    S.(H(utj)

    aP

    )f,

    •Harmonic Balance continuity equation:

    ∇•utj = 0,

    where

    Pi =n∑k=1

    k sin(kωi∆t), for i = {1,2n}.

    Corresponding to the Fourier series expansion,for n harmonics 2n + 1 equally spaced time stepswithin a period are obtained. Each of the 2n + 1equations represents one time instant. Equationswithout the ddt term in its original form (pressureand continuity equation) remain the same, usingvariables corresponding to the time instant cur-rently calculated.

    3. Numerical Procedure

    Second order accurate, polyhedral Finite VolumeMethod is used. Segregated SIMPLE solution al-gorithm is adopted. Each of the 2n + 1 time stepsis resolved in its own SIMPLE loop.

    4. Passive Scalar Transport

    Passive scalar transport in 2D rectangular domainis simulated. Four test cases are presented, dif-fering in signal imposed on inlet:• Single sine wave• Two harmonic waves•Ramped square wave•Complex square wave

    Inlet velocity is 10 m/s, diffusion coefficient is1.5 · 10−5 m2/s. This is valid for all the cases.Test cases are compared to transient simulationand data is extracted along the centreline of thedomain.

    Single sine wave is resolved using one harmonic:

    0 2.5 5 7.5 10Centerline length, m

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    Sca

    lar

    val

    ue

    Harmonic BalanceTransient

    Figure 1: Left: scalar field visualisation at t = T .Right: scalar field comparison in t = T .

    Two harmonic waves resolved using two har-monics:

    0 2.5 5 7.5 10Centerline length, m

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Sca

    lar

    val

    ue

    Harmonic BalanceTransient

    0 2.5 5 7.5 10Centerline length, m

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Sca

    lar

    val

    ue

    Harmonic BalanceTransient

    Figure 2: Scalar field comparison in t = T/5,t = 2T/5.

    Ramped square wave: solution converges usinghigher number of harmonics:

    0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

    Time, s

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    Scala

    r valu

    e

    0 2.5 5 7.5 10Centerline length, m

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    Sca

    lar

    val

    ue

    TransientHarmonic Balance, 3 harmonics

    Harmonic Balance, 5 harmonics

    Harmonic Balance, 7 harmonics

    Figure 3: Left: imposed signal. Right: solutionconvergence.

    Complex square wave: solution converges usinghigher number of harmonics:

    0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

    Time, s

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    Scala

    r valu

    e

    0 2.5 5 7.5 10Centerline length, m

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    Sca

    lar

    val

    ue

    TransientHarmonic Balance, 3 harmonics

    Harmonic Balance, 5 harmonics

    Harmonic Balance, 7 harmonics

    Harmonic Balance, 10 harmonics

    Figure 4: Left: imposed signal. Right: solutionconvergence.

    5. NACA 2412 test case

    Periodic airfoil pitching is simulated using 1, 3 and6 harmonics and compared to a transient simula-tion. Two cases are presented: 2D and 3D caseat Re = 1695. Comparison of pressure contoursaround the airfoil is given: 0–50 presents the lowercamber, 50–100 presents the upper camber.

    2D, low Re case:

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    Figure 5: One harmonic comparison at t = T/3and t = 2T/3.

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    Figure 6: Three harmonics comparison at t =4T/7 and t = T .

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    Figure 7: Six harmonics comparison at t = 6T/13and t = T .

    Figure 8: Flow field comparison at t = T .

    3D, low Re case:

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    0 25 50 75 100Expanded airfoil cells

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Pre

    ssure

    , P

    a

    TransientHarmonic Balance

    Figure 9: One harmonic comparison at t = T/3and t = 2T/3.

    6. Conclusion

    The Harmonic Balance method is presented forpassive scalar transport and Navier-Stokes equa-tions. Scalar transport is validated using fourtypes of periodic impulses resembling sine wave,complex harmonic wave and two square waves.Harmonic Balance for Navier-Stokes equation isvalidated on NACA 2412 test case both for 2D and3D application.It is shown that the Harmonic Balance method is avaluable tool for tackling periodic problems in com-putational fluid dynamics.

    10th OpenFOAM Workshop, June 29-July 2, 2015, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor


Top Related