Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve
Inflation
Perfection Deflation
1
2
But first a little behavioral economics
3
4
5
With money illusion
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
2,000
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
S&P stock prices
Without money illusion
6
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
1925 1930 1995 2000 2005 2010
Real stock prices
Depression Recent period
Macroeconomics up to now
7
IS-MP
Y
Potential output = AF(K,L)
Ypot
u
i r
Now add inflation
8
IS-MP
Y
Potential output = AF(K,L)
Ypot
u
πe
π
i r
9
Inflation’s history in the US
50
100
150200250
350
500
1000
15002000
00 25 50 75 00 25 50 75 00
CPI Price index of GDP
Pric
e (1
865-
1914
= 1
00) Gold-silver
standardperiod
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Core inflation and Fed inflation target rate
Inflation target = 2%
11
How do we measure price indexes?Consumer price index:
- Traditionally a Laspeyres price index (fixed weight index using early prices)
- BLS has introduced an experimental index – the “chain CPI” – which is a superlative Törnqvist index.
- As with output index, Laspeyres overstates inflation:g(Paasche) < g(Tornqvist), g(Fisher) <
g(Laspeyres)National accounts price indexes
- These are Fisher (superlative) indexes- Fed target uses personal consumption expenditures
price index (Fisher)“Core Inflation”
- removes volatile food and energy and is central target for monetary policy (personal consumption core price index)
12
Paasche
Laspeyres
Superlative: Fisher, Tornqvist
Remember this important set of relationships:
Holds for output indexes and price indexes!
Does it make any difference?Yes, 0.5% per year over 1970-2012
13
0.96
1.00
1.04
1.08
1.12
1.16
1.20
1.24
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
CPI/Price of PCE[Laspeyres/Fisher]
14
Major topics
1. Why do we care about inflation?2. Modern inflation theory
Why do we care about inflation?Like temperature, we care mainly about the
extremes:
Hyperinflation (> 100% a month)
Deflation (< 0)
15
16
What are costs of inflation?
Good discussion section 5-5 in MankiwBASIC ELEMENTS:
– Distinguish anticipated from unanticipated inflation (ex ante v. ex post real interest rates)
– Redistribution: inflation redistributes wealth from creditors to debtors (mortgages, pensions).
– Inefficiencies of inflation: shoe leather, menu costs, taxes,...
OVERALL:– Overall, costs appear relatively small at low
inflation rates.– Hyperinflation can destroy price mechanism– Deflation can produce low-level “bad equilibrium”
of high real interest rates and the liquidity trap
17
Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.
The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless.
Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.
(JMK, Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1919; with many hyperinflations going on.)
Keynes On inflation (really on hyperinflation)
Now to inflation theory in the US
18
Natural (Goldilocks) rate of unemployment
19
Not too hot (inflationary) and not too cold (depressionary)
20
The Expectations -Augmented Phillips Curve
Fundamentals of theory:1. Unemployment rate (u) determined by interaction of
potential and actual Y by Okun’s Law2. Inflation determined by labor/product market
tightness (u relative to “natural rate of unemployment”*) and expected inflation (πe) – Phillips curve
3. Expected inflation (πe) determined by inflation history and forecasts of future inflation
*natural rate of unemployment (Mankiw); sometimes called the NAIRU = “non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment” = Goldilocks unemployment rate
21
The Expectations -Augmented Phillips Curve
In algebra:
u - u* = λ (Y – YP)/YP
π= πe - β (u - u*)πe determined by past inflation and expectations process
22
The short-run P.C.
Graph from Economic Report of the President 1969
This was relationship that led Keynesian to believe that P.C. was a good explanation for inflation (1960s)
1. (πe)
23
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Unemployment rate
CP
I inf
latio
n ra
te
1961
1969
Early Phillips Curve
24
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Unemployment rate
CP
I inf
latio
n ra
te
1961
1969
Early Phillips Curve
25
Collapse of short-run P.C.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
U
Pi
1961
1995
1980 This was relationship that led many new classical economists to conclude that Keynesian theories were “fatally flawed” (Lucas and Sargent. 1970s)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Unemployment rate
CPI in
flatio
n rate
1961
1969
26
Mainstream 2-equation inflation model
(1)π(t) = πe(t) - β[u(t) - u*] + ε(t) [Note: corrected sign from class.]
(2)πe(t) = π(t-1)
Endogenous variablesπ = rate of price inflationπe = expected rate of inflation (or similar concept)u* = natural rate
Exogenous variablesu = actual unemployment rate (determined by policy and shocks)ε(t) = wage and price shocks (oil prices, exchange rates, globalization, decline of unions, immigration, etc...)t = time
[Note: (2) is backward looking rather than rational expectations.]
27
Simplest 1-equation inflation modelSimplify by assuming no shocks and substituting:
(3) π(t) = π(t-1) - β[u(t) - u*]
(4) Δ π(t) = - β[u(t) - u*]
which is the linear expectations-augmented P.C. model.
28u* = natural rate
π1 = π1e
SRPC1
Short-run Phillips curve
1
29u* = natural rate
π1 = π1e
Moving up short-run Phillips curve
1
2
SRPC1,2
π2
30u* = natural rate
π1 = π1e
Short-run Phillips curve shifts upward with higher inflation expectations
1
2π3
e =π2
SRPC1,2
SRPC3
31u* = natural rate
π1 = π1e
SRPC1,2
SRPC3
1
2
3π3 = π3
e
Now unemployment rate back to the natural rate
32u* = natural rate
π1 = π1e
SRPC1,2
LRPC
SRPC3
1
2
3π3
e =π2
u equals the natural rate in both periods 1 and 3, but the expected and actual inflation rates are higher in period 3.
This diagram shows the way that the SRPC shifts as expected inflation adjusts to higher rate.
33u* = natural rate
π1 = π1e
SRPC1,2
LRPC
SRPC3
1
2
3π3
e =π2
34
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Unemployment rate
Cha
nge
in c
ore
infla
tion
rate
3434
New synthesis of accelerationist PCRough estimate of natural rate for 1960-2013 = 6 percent
Δ π(t) = β[u(t) - u*]u* is u where Δ π(t) =0.
This was the new synthesis developed by Phelps and Friedman (1967-68). It now forms the basis of mainstream macro for large open economies.
Recent Phillips curve
35
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Unemployment rate
Ave
rage
hou
ry e
arni
ngs
grow
th (n
omin
al)
Phillips curve at low inflation
36 36u* = natural rate
Does Phillips curve bend because of nominal rigidity at zero inflation?
Controversial, but probably yes.
Why?
Because of the downward nominal rigidity of wages!
1-2%
37
Summary onThe Expectations-Augmented Phillips Curve
• u and π are negatively related in short run • no relation between u and π in the long run • short-run PC adjusts up and down as economic agents
adjust their inflation expectations to reality (combination of backward and forward looking expectations).
• Natural rate is u at which inflation tends neither to rise nor fall