January 14, 2015
Industry Briefing
Construction Manager General Contractor
CM/GC
Introductions
New Delivery Method
Benefits and Goals
Important Roles
Walk Bridge
Selection Process Overview
CTDOT Current Status & Next Steps
I. Important note – nothing presented or discussed here today is official. Refer to the RFQ, RFP, official questions and answers, and Contract
II. Presenters a. James Fallon, P.E. – Manager of Facilities & Transitb. Mark Rolfe, P.E. – District Construction Engineer c. Christian Brown, P.E. – HNTB Project Manager
III. Other Support – Larry Russ, Greg Dorosh, Domenic LaRosa, John Hanifin, Matt Poirier (Keville) Joe
Allegro (ACS)
The CTDOT Committee has done extensive research
I. NCHRP
II. FHWA
III. Utah & Colorado
IV. Massachusetts Department of Transportation
V. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (GLX)
VI. Others – Keville Enterprises & ACS
FHWA
• Projects that require early contractor involvement to optimize cost, schedule and quality
• When the owners wants some control of the scope and design during the project development process
• When the owner wants to use constructability, pricing and scheduling to finalize the scope
• Tight budget & schedule and requirements
FHWA
• Inherent project risk
• Opportunities for innovation
• Need for specialized qualifications
• Benefits from early procurement
• Limited or fixed budget
FHWA
• Opportunities for innovation
• Risk reduction & allocation
• Improved cost control
• Improved design quality
• Schedule optimization
• Collaboration
FHWA
FHWA
PROJECT TRAITS D-B-B CM/GC D-B
RISK MANAGEMENT
Very limited Very effective Best for low risk shifting
COLLABORATION Very limited Very collaborative Moderate collaboration contractual limitations
PRICE CERTAINTY
None, subject to over-runs and change order
Very effective, early price certainty during project development
Very effective, early price certainty during project development
SCHEDULE ACCELERATION COMPLETION
No ability to overlap design & construction. Can accelerate construction with A+B
Ability to overlap design & construction, ability to optimize schedule not just acceleration
Ability to overlap design & construction, very effective for accelerating project delivery
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY
Low bid can compromise quality
Very beneficial to building a quality project
Very beneficial to building a quality project
GENERAL SUITABILITY OF DELIVERY MODEL
FHWA
GENERAL SUITABILITY OF DELIVERY MODEL
PROJECT TRAITS
D-B-B CM/GC D-B
INNOVATION Design innovation only, very limited opportunities for contractor innovation
Very effective for capturing design and construction innovation
Very effective for capturing design and construction innovation
CONSTRUCTABILITY
Very difficult to obtain construction input during design
Optimal delivery method for obtaining construction input before design is complete
Effective delivery method for obtaining construction input before design is complete
OWNER CONTROL
High level control Optimal level of owner control
Somewhat limited owner control, more performance based outcome
COMPETITIVE PRICING
High level Somewhat limited, competitive markup not final project cost
Good competition, but usually limited to short-listed teams
DESIGNER OF RECORD
DB ENTITY
TRADE / SUBS
ConnDOT
TRADE / SUBS
DESIGN SUBS
Design-Build CM/GC
ConnDOT
DESIGNER OF RECORD CM/GC
• Identify and manage risks, early in the process, and into the construction phase
• Optimize design and construction schedules/budgets
• Improve project quality
• Get it done properly and quickly
Integrated team approach to:
Integrated team approach to:
• Minimize construction changes
• Early Contactor advice and innovation
• Manage complex railroad requirements and limited access
• Minimize disruption to bridge users
• Public Owner o Project Management Team
o Discipline Leads
• PM Consultant
• Designer
• Independent Cost Estimator (ICE)
DESIGNER CM/GC
PM Consultant
Independent Cost
Estimator
ConnDOT
ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES
• Design Consultant (Engineer) remains the ‘Engineer of Record’
• CM/GC is to identify innovative construction solutions
• CM/GC to provide advice to designer during final design
• The CMGC Delivery model promotes cooperation, collaboration, and efficiency
• Co-location
• Maintains flexibility to determine what elements of the work to self-perform to meet the 50% requirement
• Emphasis is on contractor experience(s) as part of selection
• Is expected to generate innovative construction ideas prior to pricing
• Increased quality of final design plans
• Maximizes the opportunity to add value to project
• Coordinated planning & construction operations
• Constructability reviews
• Early risk identification, mitigation and sharing program
• Options analysis (cost, schedule, efficiency, quality)
• Detailed cost estimates and knowledge of marketplace conditions
• Overall project price certainty (GMP)
• Advise ConnDOT on ways to gain efficiencies
• Mitigate construction impact on bridge/rail users
PRECONSTRUCTION
Defined• Comprised of all construction work – including
Subcontractor, Project Overheads, and the Construction Multiplier (Home Office Overhead and Profit)
• Finalized when the design reaches 100%
• Contingency will be Owner Controlled
• Contract Packaging TBD
(GMP)
• The CM/GC team may be comprised of multiple prime contractors and named key sub-contractors
• CM/GC provides a Sub-Contractor plan as part of the RFP
• CM/GC must self-perform no less than 50% of the work
• CM/GC must prepare sub-contractor bid packages and facilitate a transparent sub-contractor selection
Note: Unsuccessful GMP = will be re-bid by other methods and the CM/GC will be precluded from bidding the re-packaged work
• The price of ‘Pre-Con’ staffing will not be factored as part of the selection
» After selection negotiations of preconstruction phase services will proceed based on ‘hours’ to meet combined goals
» ConnDOT may establish a Max/Not to Exceed for Pre-Con phase
• CM/GC bidders are to propose all key staff members as part of the ‘Experience section’ of the RFQ
• ‘Approach section’ - all CM/GC bidders are to furnish resumes and rates of all staff that are proposed to be a part of the Pre-Con
• The CM/GC Entity will submit actual expenses – certifying paid staff at rates provided - with Preconstruction Services Multiplier applied
PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICESANTICIPATED TO BE 18 TO 24 MONTHS
DESIGN SUBS
CTDOT
DESIGNER OF RECORD
CM/GC (named
subs)
Negotiate (Interim)
GMP
Bid competitively
TRADE / SUBS
RELATIONSHIP AND PRICING
24
PM Consultant
Independent Cost
EstimatorCTDOT
CM/GC
All: Discuss and Plan – •Work Breakdown & Estimate Organization•Cost estimate narrative •Limitations of operations & Schedule Requirements•Quantities•Method of measurement •Basis of payment•Means & Methods •Equipment •Crews •Risk Items •Sub-Contracting Packaging
Estimate
ESTIMATE CALIBRATION MEETINGS
The Contractor will be selected using a “best value” Quality Based Selection process
ConnDOT Selection Committee will evaluate the Proposer’s:
qualifications
technical proposal
interview
and price proposal
In accordance with the ConnDOT Bid and Award Manual
GROUP NO. 10 MAJOR BRIDGES – the prime Contractor must meet this prequalification requirement. Seeking specific experience in the construction of movable bridges.
GROUP NO. 21 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION and GROUP NO. 22 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICAL –
The Proposer shall meet these two requirements (Group 21 and 22) either as the prime bidder or by use of a Key Subcontractor.
Pre-Qualification application must be on file prior to the submission of the Statement of Qualifications
• Team Experience
• Construction Experience
• Construction Administration Skills
• Construction Oversight
• Corporate AA/EEO Plan
RFQ Criteria
• General Management
• Subcontracting Plan
• Preconstruction Phase
• Construction Phase
• Interview
• Price Component
1st
2nd
3rd
Price Score
PRICING COMPONENT & TECH SCORE
33
Industry Briefing 1/14/15 (TODAY)
Issue RFQ Week 1/19/15
Proposers Submit SOQ Week of 2/09/15
Issue RFP Week of 3/9/15
Proposers Submit Proposal Week of 4/6/15
Select CM/GC Week of 5/11/15
ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE: