Kent Adams Vice President – Drilling and Completions BOPCO, L.P.
Private Exploration and Production Company HQ’d in Fort Worth, TX
Active Operator in NM since early 1950’s
Private Exploration and Production Company HQ’d in Fort Worth, TX
Active Operator in NM since early 1950’s 5th Largest Oil Producer in NM in 2013
Private Exploration and Production Company HQ’d in Fort Worth, TX
Active Operator in NM since early 1950’s 5th Largest Oil Producer in NM in 2013 Exceptional YOY Growth Since 2009
Achieved Through Utilization of HZ Drilling and Hydraulic Fracturing.
•Three Large Units •Mostly in Eddy County, NM •Mostly Federal Acreage •200,000 Net Acres •Contiguous
Historical Fresh Water Stimulation Design
•Typically 50,000 to 100,000 bbls (2.1MM to 4.2 MM gal) used per well. •Chemicals added to Gel and Crosslink the fluid. •Proppant – 2 million to 5 million pounds of sand per well.
Historical Fresh Water Stimulation Design
•Typically 50,000 to 100,000 bbls (2.1MM to 4.2 MM gal) used per well. •Chemicals added to Gel and Crosslink the fluid. •Proppant – 2 million to 5 million pounds of sand per well. Advantages •Predictable - Chemistry to generate gelled fluid is well known •Ease of Storage & Transport – Spilling fresh water is not an environmental problem.
Historical Fresh Water Stimulation Design
•Typically 50,000 to 100,000 bbls (2.1MM to 4.2 MM gal) used per well. •Chemicals added to Gel and Crosslink the fluid. •Proppant – 2 million to 5 million pounds of sand per well. Advantages •Predictable - Chemistry to generate gelled fluid is well known •Ease of Storage & Transport – Spilling fresh water is not an environmental problem. Disadvantages •SE New Mexico in Arid Desert Region. •Cost/Competition for Use – Residential, Agriculture, Industrial (mining, O&G, etc) •Potentially Unreliable as a Long Term Source for a Stimulation Fluid
Historical Fresh Water Stimulation Design
•Typically 50,000 to 100,000 bbls (2.1MM to 4.2 MM gal) used per well. •Chemicals added to Gel and Crosslink the fluid. •Proppant – 2 million to 5 million pounds of sand per well. Advantages •Predictable - Chemistry to generate gelled fluid is well known •Ease of Storage & Transport – Spilling fresh water is not an environmental problem. Disadvantages •SE New Mexico in Arid Desert Region. •Cost/Competition for Use – Residential, Agriculture, Industrial (mining, O&G, etc) •Potentially Unreliable as a Long Term Source for a Stimulation Fluid
Alternative •Produced Water – Plentiful, Natural By-Product of Oil & Gas Production •Started Movement toward Utilizing Produced Water (PW) as a Stimulation Fluid in 2012
To JRU • Contiguous Acreage
Ideal for Constructing and Utilizing Extensive Infrastructure
• Poker Lake Unit and James Ranch Unit Complete
• Approximatley 100,000 BWPD Available
• Work Ongoing in Big Eddy Unit
SWD’s
SWD Line
Challenges of Utilizing Produced Water
Fresh Water Produced Water
Specific Gravity 1.00 1.19
pH 7.9 5.9
Chlorides 640 ppm 174,000 ppm
Iron 0 ppm 550 ppm
Total Dissolved Solids
1320 ppm 265,000 ppm
•Water is Highly Salt Saturated •Consistency of PW in SWD System is Unpredictable •Chemistry to Gel and Crosslink Produced Water is Immature •Getting PW Where You Need it in the Quantities You Need is Logistically Difficult - Storage a Challenge •Spilling PW on the Ground is Very Expensive to Clean Up
Crosslinked Produced Water Example
FW Job PW w/ EC PW w/o Treatment
Water Cost $250,000 $0 $0 Water Treatment
$0 $65,000 $22,500
Water Transport
$75,000 $285,000 $285,000
Pumping Cost
$1,300,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Total Cost
$1,625,000 $1,850,000 $1,807,500
* - Jobs Assume 15 Stages to Complete Standard 1 Mile Horizontal Well Economics of Fresh Water vs Produced Water
BOTTOM LINE IT IS EXTREMELY CHALLENGING AND CURRENTLY COST NEUTRAL AT BEST TO UTILIZE PRODUCED WATER AS A STIMULATION FLUID.
•January 2013- First PW Job Pumped in HZ Well •August 2013 – First Gelled & X-Linked PW Job Pumped – Water EC Treated to Remove Iron, TPH & TSS •May 2014 – First Gelled & XL Job Pumped with No Water Treatment •To Date 20 Jobs Pumped Using 100% PW Saving Approx 90 MM Gal of Fresh Water •Currently Utilize 100% Produced Water on ½ of BOPCO Acreage Saving Approx 5 Million Gal Fresh Water per Job
BOPCO’s Transition to Produced Water Stimulations
Logistics Develop Infrastructure to Fully Utilize our Produced
Water Looking into Different Storage Options Minimize Frac Tanks by Maximizing Delivery Rate
Gel Chemistry - Fluid Stability Water analysis Breaker Tests Chemical Usage Temperature Evaluation Scaling Tendency
EH&S – Spill Prevention Early detection of leaks Use of containment alarms Prompt Clean Up of Spills
QUESTIONS???