5 WEST 125TH STREET
MANHATTAN, NEW YORK
Remedial Action Report
NYC VCP Project Number: 13CVCP115M
OER Project Number: 11EHAN269M
Prepared For:
CA 5-15 125TH Street LLC & HARCO Consultants Corporation
511 Canal Street, Suite 400, New York, NY 10013
(212) 924 - 3100
Prepared By:
Paul Lageraaen, P.E.
575 Broad Hollow Rd, Melville, NY 11747
(631) 756 - 8000
DECEMBER 2016
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
2
REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ 2
LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................... 7
CERTIFICATION .................................................................................................. 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 9
REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT ......................................................................... 16
1.0 SITE BACKGROUND 16
1.1 SITE LOCATION AND BACKGROUND .................................................... 16
1.2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN .......................................................................... 17
1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY ..................................... 17
1.4 SUMMARY OF PAST USES AND AREAS OF CONCERN ...................... 17
1.5 SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER THE REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................... 20
1.6 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION .............. 20
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ACTIONS 22
3.0 COMPLIANCE WITH REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN 24
3.1 HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN ......................................................................... 24
3.2 COMMUNITY AIR MONITORING PLAN ................................................. 24
3.3 SOIL/MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................. 25
3.4 STORM-WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION .......................................... 25
3.5 DEVIATIONS FROM THE REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN ............. 25
4.0 REMEDIAL PROGRAM 27
4.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION ........................................................................ 27
4.2 SITE CONTROLS .......................................................................................... 27
4.3 MATERIALS EXCAVATION AND REMOVAL ........................................ 29
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
3
4.4 MATERIALS DISPOSAL ............................................................................. 33
4.5 BACKFILL IMPORT ..................................................................................... 33
4.6 DEMARACTION ........................................................................................... 33
5.0 ENGINEERING CONTROLS 34
6.0 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS 36
7.0 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN 36
8.0 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 37
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
4
FIGURES
Figure 1: Site Boundary Map
Figure 2: Site Location
Figure 3: Development Plan
Figure 4: Map of end-point sample locations
Figure 5: Map showing location and approximate depth of excavations
Figure 6: Map of soil/fill reuse and backfill placement locations
Figure 7: Map of location of Composite Cover System
Figure 8: Map of location of Vapor Barrier System
Figure 9: As-built design detail for Vapor Barrier System
Figure 10: Development Plan 2
Figure 11: Elevator Pit Plan
Figure 12: Cellar Level Reflected Ceiling Plan
Figure 13: Foundation Sections and Details
Figure 14: First Floor Reflected Ceiling Plan
Figure 15-18: Exterior Elevation
Figure 19: Foundation Plan
Figure 20-24: Section View
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
5
TABLES
Table 1-4: Summary of end-point analytical results
Table 5: List of SCOs
Table 6: Disposal quantities and disposal facilities
Table 7: Backfill quantities and sources
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
6
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Remedial Investigation Report
Appendix B: Remedial Action Work Plan
Appendix C: Daily and Monthly Reports to OER
Appendix D: Photographs of Remedial Action
Appendix E: Disposal Facility Approval Letter
Appendix F: Shipping and Disposal Manifests
Appendix G: Disposal Characterization Sample Laboratory Testing Results
Appendix H: End-point sample analytical laboratory data
Appendix I: As-built drawings and documentation for Engineering Controls
Appendix J: Letter to OER from architect
Appendix K: Letter to OER from H2M
Appendix L: Letter to NYCDEP from Kosuri
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
7
LIST OF ACRONYMS
Acronym Definition
CAMP Community Air Monitoring Plan
DER-10 NYS DEC Division of Environmental Remediation Technical Guidance Manual 10
EC Engineering Control
HASP Health and Safety Plan
IC Institutional Control
NYC VCP New York City Voluntary Cleanup Program
NYC DEP New York City Department of Environmental Protection
NYC DOHMH New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
NYC OER New York City Office of Environmental Remediation
ORC Oxygen Release Compound
PID Photoionization Detector
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control
QEP Qualified Environmental Professional
RAR Remedial Action Report
RAWP Remedial Action Work Plan
SCG Standards, Criteria and Guidance
SCO Soil Cleanup Objective
SMMP Soil/Materials Management Plan
SMP Site Management Plan
SVOCs Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
UST Underground Storage Tank
VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds
5 West 125`h StreetRemedial Action Report
December, 2016
CERTIFICATION
I, Paul Lageraaen, certify the following:• I am currently a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of New York.• I performed professional engineering services and had primary direct responsibility for
implementation of the remedial program for the 5 West 125' Street site, site number13CVCP115M. I certify to the following:
• I have reviewed this document, to which my signature and seal are affixed.• The vapor barrier system and composite cover system constructed during this remedial action
were designed by me or a person under my direct supervision and achieve the goals established inthe Remedial Action Work Plan for this site.
• The vapor barrier system and composite cover system constructed during this remedial actionwere professionally observed by me or by a person under my direct supervision and are accuratelyreflected in the text and drawings for as-built design reported in this Remedial Action Report.
• The OER-approved Remedial Action Work Plan dated February 2013 and Stipulations in a letterdated March 20, 2013 were implemented and that all requirements in those documents have beensubstantively complied with. I certify that contaminated soil, fill, liquids or other material from theproperty were taken to facilities licensed to accept this material in full compliance with applicablelaws and regulations.
PE License Number O~ C{ ~!„ ,'1~ tr l,l
Signature "~/ ~/
l
Date /L~/(>/l;✓/ L/
I, Joseph Loesch, certify the following:
I am a Qualified Environmental Professional. I had primazy direct responsibility for implementationof the remedial program for the 5 West 125' Street site, site number 13CVCP115M. I certify to thefollowing:The OER-approved Remedial Action Work Plan dated Februazy 2013 and Stipulations in a letterdated March 20, 2013 were implemented and that all requirements in those documents have beensubstantively complied with. I certify that contaminated soil, fill, liquids or other material from theproperty were taken to facilities licensed to accept this material in full compliance with applicablelaws and regulations.
QEP Name J ~~Iw _ 1 ~{/ ~ S C
QEP Siena[ure
Date /~//~/~
~~
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CA 5-15 125TH Street LLC and HARCO Consultants Corporation has enrolled in
the New York City Voluntary Cleanup Program (NYC VCP) to investigate and remediate
a property located at 5 West 125th Street in the Harlem section of Manhattan, New York.
A Remedial Investigation (RI) was performed to compile and evaluate data and
information necessary to develop a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP). A remedial
action was performed pursuant to an OER-approved RAWP in a manner that has
rendered the Site protective of public health and the environment consistent with the
proposed use of the property. This RAR describes the remedial action performed under
the RAWP. The remedial action described in this document provides for the protection of
public health and the environment, complies with applicable environmental standards,
criteria and guidance and applicable laws and regulations.
Site Location and Background
The Site is located at 5 West 125th Street in the Harlem section of Manhattan,
New York and is currently identified as Block - 1723 and Lots – 31, 45 and 144 on the
New York City Tax Map. The Site is bounded to the north and south by 126th Street and
125th Street respectively and by abutting commercial buildings to the east and west
beyond which is 5th Avenue and Lenox Avenue, respectively. The Site has an area of
27,500 square feet and prior to redevelopment site was most recently a vacant inactive
construction site that had been excavated to approximately eleven-feet below sidewalk
grade in 2008.
Summary of Redevelopment Plan
The Site has been redeveloped with a new six (6)-story mixed-use commercial
and residential building consisting of three (3) floors and a cellar for retail use, and three
(3) floors for residential use. Mechanical rooms and T.J. Maxx Retail Store are located in
the cellar. The foundation of the building was installed at 17 feet and 6 inches below
surface sidewalk grade (6.5 feet below existing site grade). The elevator installed in the
new development is approximately 20 feet and 6 inches below street grade. No
landscaped or open areas exist on the Subject Property. The building is setback 12’-3”
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
10
from the curb on 125th Street and 13’-1” from the curb on 126th Street. The building and
cellar occupies the entire footprint of the lot. A total of 8,070 tons of soil/fill was
excavated and disposed off-Site. Groundwater was encountered during excavation for the
construction of the building cellar and dewatering was required.
The current zoning designation for the Site is R7A. The new use is consistent with
existing zoning for the property.
Summary of Description of Surrounding Property
The surrounding properties along 126th Street are residential with the exception of
a church directly north of the subject property and a self-service laundromat two
properties to the east along 126th street. The surrounding properties along 125th street are
mixed use residential and commercial. The adjoining property to the east along 125th
Street is an Applebee’s restaurant. All other properties along 125th Street consist of first
floor commercial space with residential space in the upper floors. Additionally, two-day
care facilities are identified on the 124th Street within 250-feet of the subject property.
No other sensitive receptors such as hospitals, schools, or daycare facilities were
identified within 500-feet of the subject property.
Summary of Past Site Uses of Site and Areas of Concern
Based upon the review of the Fire Insurance Maps and Regulatory Agency
documents from the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Reports dated August
2008 and prepared by EBI Consulting of Burlington Massachusetts, a Site history was
established. Historic use of the Site included a YMCA and associated dormitories,
residential and commercial buildings. Following the demolition of the YMCA and
associated buildings, the site was redeveloped as a parking lot and residential dwellings,
as shown on the 1951 Sanborn Fire Insurance map. The use of these properties was
consistent through the 1992 Sanborn map. No Recognized Environmental Conditions
(RECs) were identified in the Phase I ESA report.
The AOCs identified for this Site include:
1. Historic fill is present at the Site from grade to a depth ranging from 4 to 21
feet below sidewalk grade.
Summary of the Work Performed under the Remedial Investigation
Langan Engineering & Environmental Services performed the following scope of work at
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
11
the Site in May of 2011:
1. Conducted a Site inspection to identify AOCs and physical obstructions (i.e.
structures, buildings, etc.);
2. Completed eight soil borings and collected of two soil samples per boring for
chemical analysis to evaluate soil quality; and
3. Installed and sampled three monitoring wells in order to assess site groundwater
conditions.
Summary of Findings of Remedial Investigation
1. Elevation of the property is approximately 25 feet.
2. Depth to groundwater is approximately 14.5 to 15 feet below sidewalk grade at
the Site.
3. Groundwater flow is generally from west to east beneath the Site.
4. Depth to bedrock is at the Site is approximately 48 to 63-feet below sidewalk
grade.
5. The stratigraphy of the Site, from the surface down, consists of fill overlying
successive strata of sand, silt and clay, glacial till, and rock. The fill layer,
consisting of sand and gravel with brick, concrete, wood, and miscellaneous
debris, was observed throughout the site to depths of approximately 4 to 21-feet
below sidewalk grade. The fill material is underlain by a 6 to 18-foot thick layer
of loose to medium dense fine to coarse sands, followed by silt and clay and an
approximately 6-foot thick layer of glacial till. Bedrock, consisting of a gneiss and
marble, was encountered at depths ranging from approximately 48 to 63-feet
below sidewalk grade.
6. Soil/fill samples collected during the RI showed no detectable concentrations of
PCBs. No VOCs were detected in soil, except for trace levels (2.3 ppb) of
tetrachloroethene in one soil sample. Select SVOCs, all polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) including benzo(a)anthracene (4.37 ppm), benzo(a)pyrene
(3.99 ppm), benzo(b)fluroanthene (3.06 ppm), benzo(k)fluroanthene (2.1 ppm),
chrysene (4.22 ppm), and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (2.17 ppm) were identified in
two of sixteen soil samples at concentrations found above their Track 1
Unrestricted Use and Track 2 Restricted Residential Use SCOs. Pesticides
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
12
including 4,4-DDE (0.0214 ppm), 4,4-DDT (0.0814 ppm), dieldrin (0.0064 ppm)
and heptachlor (0.09 ppm) were detected above their Track 1 Unrestricted Use
SCOs in four shallow sample. Several metals including barium, chromium, lead,
mercury and zinc were detected above Track 1 Unrestricted Use SCOs and of
these lead (max. of 606 ppm) and mercury (max. of 0.84 ppm) also exceeded
Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs in two soil samples. Overall, these results
are consistent with levels of pesticides, SVOCs, and metals found at sites
throughout NYC with historic fill material.
7. Groundwater samples collected during the RI showed no detectable PCBs or
SVOCs. One pesticide, 4,4-DDD was in one of three groundwater samples at
concentrations below NYSDEC Groundwater Quality Standards (GQS). One
VOC tetrachloroethene was detected in 1 groundwater samples at trace levels (1
ppb), below its GQS. Three metals, iron (338 ug/l), manganese (17,300 ug/l) and
sodium (349,000 ug/l), were detected above GQSs in dissolved groundwater
samples.
8. Soil vapor sampling was not conducted because the site was already excavated up
to a depth of 11 feet and groundwater was about one to two feet below grade.
Summary of the Remedial Action
The remedial action achieved protection of public health and the environment for
the intended use of the property. The remedial action achieved all of the remedial action
objectives established for the project and addressed applicable standards, criterion, and
guidance; was effective in both the short-term and long-term and reduced mobility,
toxicity and volume of contaminants; was cost effective and implementable; and used
standards methods that are well established in the industry.
A summary of the milestones achieved in the Remedial Action is as follows: A
Pre-Application Meeting was held on February, 4, 2013 and again on September 17, 2014
with a new consultant team. A Remedial Investigation (RI) was performed from May to
July, 2011. A RI Report was prepared to evaluate data and information necessary to
develop a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP). A Site Contact List was established. A
RAWP was prepared and released with a Fact Sheet on February 14, 2013 for a 30-day
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
13
public comment period. The RAWP and Stipulation List dated March 20, 2013 was
approved by the New York City Office of Environmental Remediation (OER) on April 2,
2013. A Pre-Construction Meeting was held on April 4, 2013. A Fact Sheet providing
notice of the start of the remedial action was issued on April 2, 2013. The remedial action
was begun in October, 2013 and completed in December, 2015.
The remedial action consisted of the following tasks:
1. Prepared a Community Protection Statement and implemented a Citizen
Participation Plan.
2. Performed a Community Air Monitoring Program for particulates and volatile
organic carbon compounds.
3. Selected NYSDEC Part 375 Track 1 Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
(SCOs).
4. Mobilized site security, equipment, utility mark outs and marking & staking
excavation areas.
5. Performed Waste Characterization Study prior to excavation activities. Eight (8)
soil borings were performed during the Phase II investigation of the Subject
property. Waste characterization soil samples were collected from these borings
on May 26, 2011. Waste characterization samples were collected at a frequency
dictated by disposal facility(s).
6. The following excavations were performed: soil was removed to a depth of 17
feet 6 inches from sidewalk grade beneath the area of the new building (entire
property). No landscaped or open areas exist on the Subject Property. The
building is setback 12’-3” from the curb on 125th Street and 13’-1” from the curb
on 126th Street. The building and cellar occupies the entire footprint of the lot.
Additional excavation occurred to 20.5 feet below sidewalk grade for the
elevator pits. A total of 5,978 cubic yards of soil/fill was excavated and removed
from the property. Excavated 3,638 cubic yards of non-hazardous soil/fill and
transported to Sky Materials located at 4331 Middle Country Road in Calverton,
NY 11933; excavated 160 cubic yards of clean soil and transported to 55 Pearl
Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 utilizing the NYC Clean Soil Bank; excavated 2,180
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
14
cubic yards of clean soil and transported to Fresh Kills in Staten Island utilizing
the NYC Clean Soil Bank.
7. Screened excavated soil/fill during intrusive work for indications of
contamination by visual means, odor, and monitoring with a PID.
8. Conducted materials management of excavated materials including temporarily
stockpiling and segregating in accordance with defined material types and to
prevent co-mingling of contaminated material and non-contaminated materials.
9. Appropriately segregated excavated media onsite prior to disposal. Transported
and disposed all soil/fill material at permitted facilities in accordance with all
applicable laws and regulations for handling, transport, and disposal, and the
RAWP.
10. Collected and analyzed end-point samples to determine attainment of SCOs.
Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs were achieved.
11. As part of development, constructed an engineered Composite Cover System
consisting of 2-feet of concrete slab underlain by #57 Stone. The contractor for
the cover construction was Nova Concrete Contractors.
12. As part of development, installed a Vapor Barrier System that consisted of
Xypex Admix blended concrete mix to waterproof and protect the concrete
poured for the slab and basement walls. Aquifin Vaportight Coat SG2 (30 mils),
an interior applied barrier was also used to prevent capillary infiltration of oil,
Radon, and other gases and chemical from the ground and as a secondary
containment of water vapor. The product was applied to the below grade
concrete foundation walls and cellar floor slab. The contractor for the Vapor
Barrier System construction was Nova Concrete Contractors.
13. Performed all activities required for the Remedial Action, including permitting
requirements and pretreatment requirements, in compliance with applicable laws
and regulations.
14. Implemented storm-water pollution prevention measures in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations.
15. Submitted a Sustainability Report.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
15
16. Submitted a RAR that describes the Remedial Action, certifies that the remedial
requirements defined in the Remedial Action Work Plan have been achieved;
defines the Site boundaries; and describes any changes from the RAWP.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
16
REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT
1.0 SITE BACKGROUND
CA 5-15 125TH Street LLC and HARCO Consultants Corporation has enrolled in
the New York City Voluntary Cleanup Program (NYC VCP) to investigate and remediate
a property located at 5 West 125th Street in the Harlem section of Manhattan, New York.
The boundary of the property subject to this Remedial Action is shown in Figure 1 and
include, in their entirety, Manhattan Block 1723 and Lot(s) 31, 45 & 144. The Remedial
Action was performed pursuant to the OER-approved RAWP in a manner that has
rendered the property protective of public health and the environment consistent with its
intended use. This RAR describes the remedial action performed under the RAWP. The
remedial action described in this document provides for the protection of public health
and the environment, complies with applicable environmental standards, criteria and
guidance and applicable laws and regulations.
1.1 SITE LOCATION AND BACKGROUND
The subject property is located on 125th Street between 5th Avenue and Lenox
Avenue. The site is bounded to the north and south by 126th Street and 125th Street
respectively and by abutting buildings to the east and west in the Harlem neighborhood of
Manhattan, New York (Figure 1). The site has an area of approximately ±0.59-acre and
was a vacant inactive construction site that had been excavated to approximately eleven-
feet below sidewalk grade in 2008. This site is currently owned by the CA 5-15 125th
Street LLC. Historically, the site was operated as a YMCA and associated dormitories, a
commercial parking lot and residential dwellings. According to the New York City
Department of City Planning, the subject property is designated as E 201 (CEQR number
07DCP030M), Block 1723, Lots 31, 45 and 144.
The properties adjoining the site consist of residential to the north and northwest and
commercial development to the east, south and southwest. A site plan of the property is
provided as Figure 2.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
17
1.2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
The use of the Site consists of a six (6)-story mixed use commercial and
residential building consisting of three (3) floors and a cellar for retail use, and three (3)
floors for residential use. The foundation of the building was installed at 17 feet and 6
inches below surface sidewalk grade. The elevator installed in the new development was
approximately 20 feet and 6 inches below grade. No landscaped or open areas exist on
the Subject Property. The building occupies the entire footprint of the lot.
Groundwater was observed to be approximately 14.5 to 15 feet below sidewalk grade
during the May 2011 Phase II Environmental Investigation completed by Langan. The
site was excavated below the groundwater table to allow for the construction of the
building cellar. Dewatering was completed as part of the site redevelopment activities.
A map showing the building location, basement location and open space location is
shown in the Development Plan in Figure 10.
1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY
The properties adjoining the site consist of residential to the north and northwest and
commercial development to the east, south and southwest. Additionally, two-day care
facilities are identified on the 124th Street within 250-feet of the subject property. No
other sensitive receptors were identified within 500-feet of the subject property.
1.4 SUMMARY OF PAST USES AND AREAS OF CONCERN
Based upon the review of the Fire Insurance Maps and Regulatory Agency
documents from the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report dated August
2008 and prepared by EBI Consulting, a Site history was established. Historic use
including YMCA and associated dormitories and residential and commercial buildings.
Following the demolition of the YMCA and associated buildings, the site was
redeveloped as a parking lot and residential dwellings through 1992. Most recently the
property was an inactive construction site with no improvements.
A remedial investigation was performed and the results are documented in a
companion document called “Remedial Investigation Report, 5 West 125th Street”, dated
July 2011 (RIR).
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
18
The following previous environmental reports were completed for the subject
property:
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report dated 11 August
2008 prepared for RCG Longview Debt Fund IV, L.P. and Capital One Bank c/o RCG
Longview, prepared by EBI Consulting of Burlington Massachusetts and submitted to
NYCOER on 15 April 2011;
• Phase II Subsurface Investigation Workplan (SIW) dated 15 April 2011
prepared by Langan, revised 18 May 2011 based on NYCOER comments made on 16
May 2011; and,
• Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report dated 25 July 2011 prepared by
Langan.
• 125th Street Acoustical Measurement Protocol dated 15 June 2011
prepared by Cerami Associates, Inc.
A copy of the ESA report and SIW were provided previously under separate
cover.
Phase I ESA (2008)
The August 2008 ESA was completed for Block 1723 Lots 31, 45, 140 and 144.
The property that is the subject of this Work Plan is limited to Lots 31, 45 and 144, Lot
140 is not part of the proposed redevelopment. Historic use of the site was identified as a
YMCA and associated dormitories and residential and commercial buildings. Following
the demolition of the YMCA and associated buildings, the site was redeveloped as a
parking lot and residential dwellings, as shown on the 1951 Sanborn Fire Insurance map.
The use of these properties was consistent through the 1992 Sanborn map. No
Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified in the Phase I ESA report.
The Phase I ESA documents that groundwater samples were collected to obtain a
NYCDEP Bureau of Wastewater Treatment permit for the discharge of groundwater from
the dewatering system that was installed to be operated during the excavation of
foundations for the building previously proposed at the site. Groundwater samples were
reportedly collected and tested for polychlorinated biphenyls via United States
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
19
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 608, semi-volatile organic compounds
by EPA Method 625 and volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 624. None of
these compounds were reported above the laboratory method detection limits.
Phase II SIW (2011)
Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA a Phase II SIW was developed to assess
subsurface conditions at the site via the collection of soil and groundwater samples.
Based on the 16 May 2011 NYCOER comments, the soil vapor sampling that was
proposed in the Phase II Scope of Work, was deleted from the 18 May 2011 Work Plan
Addendum. The findings of this investigation are detailed in Section 4.0 below.
Phase II Site Investigation Report (2011)
In order to address NYCOER requirements pertaining to the (E)-designation of
the site, soil, and groundwater sampling as part of a Phase II Environmental Investigation
was completed by Langan. The scope of work for the Phase II Environmental
Investigation was designed to assess the RECs identified in the Phase I ESA.
The scope of work was designed to:
• Identify the potential presence and extent of impacted soil, and/or
groundwater at the site;
• Determine contaminant(s) of concerns that may be encountered during site
redevelopment activities for incorporation into a construction Health and Safety Plan, if
necessary; and,
• Evaluate remediation options for any impacted soil vapor, soil, and/or
groundwater in accordance with NYSDEC and NYCOER regulations, if required.
The AOCs identified for this site include:
1. Historic fill is present at the Site from grade to a depth ranging from 4 to
21 feet below sidewalk grade. Currently, entire site has been excavated to a depth of
approximately 11-feet below sidewalk grade as part of the previous site development.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
20
Historic fill is identified to be between 3 to 4-feet in thickness from the current site grade.
1.5 SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER THE REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION
1. Conducted a Site inspection to identify AOCs and physical obstructions (i.e.
structures, buildings, etc.);
2. Completion of eight soil borings and collection of two soil samples per boring
to assess soil conditions and potential health and safety issues regarding soil disturbance
during the proposed site renovation;
3. Installation and sampling of three monitoring wells in order to assess site
groundwater conditions; and,
4. Completion of a Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report.
1.6 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
1. Elevation of the property is approximately 25 feet.
2. Depth to groundwater is approximately 14.5 to 15 feet at the Site.
Approximately, 3.5 to 4-feet below the current site grade.
3. Groundwater flow is generally from west to east beneath the Site.
4. Depth to bedrock is at the Site is approximately 48 to 63-feet below
sidewalk grade. The stratigraphy of the Site, from the surface down, consists of fill
overlying successive strata of sand, silt and clay, glacial till, and rock. The fill layer,
consisting of sand and gravel with brick, concrete, wood, and miscellaneous debris, was
observed throughout the site to depths of approximately 4 to 21-feet below sidewalk
grade. The fill material is underlain by a 6 to 18-foot thick layer of loose to medium
dense fine to coarse sands, followed by silt and clay and an approximately 6-foot thick
layer of glacial till. Bedrock, consisting of a gneiss and marble, was encountered at
depths ranging from approximately 48 to 63-feet below sidewalk grade.
5. Soil/fill samples collected during the RI showed no detectable
concentrations of PCBs. No VOCs were detected in soil, except for trace levels (2.3 ppb)
of tetrachloroethene in one soil sample. Select SVOCs, all polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) including benzo(a)anthracene (4.37 ppm), benzo(a)pyrene (3.99
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
21
ppm), benzo(b)fluroanthene (3.06 ppm), benzo(k)fluroanthene (2.1 ppm), chrysene (4.22
ppm), and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (2.17 ppm) were identified in two of sixteen soil
samples at concentrations found above their Track 1 Unrestricted Use and Track 2
Restricted Residential Use SCOs. Pesticides including 4,4-DDE (0.0214 ppm), 4,4-DDT
(0.0814 ppm), dieldrin (0.0064 ppm) and heptachlor(0.09 ppm) were detected above their
Track 1 Unrestricted Use SCOs in four shallow sample. Several metals including barium,
chromium, lead, mercury and zinc were detected above Track 1 Unrestricted Use SCOs
and of these lead (max. of 606 ppm) and mercury (max. of 0.84 ppm) also exceeded
Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs in two soil samples. Overall, these results are
consistent with levels of pesticides, SVOCs, and metals found at sites throughout NYC
with historic fill material.
6. Groundwater samples collected during the RI showed no detectable PCBs
or SVOCs. One pesticide, 4,4-DDD was in one of three groundwater samples at
concentrations below NYSDEC Groundwater Quality Standards (GQS). One VOC
tetrachloroethene was detected in 1 groundwater samples at trace levels (1 ppb), below its
GQS. Three metals, iron, manganese and sodium, were detected above GQSs in
dissolved groundwater samples.
7. Soil vapor sampling was not conducted because the site is already
excavated up to 11 feet depths and groundwater is about one to two feet below existing
grades.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
22
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ACTIONS
The remedial action was performed in accordance with an OER approved
Remedial Action Work Plan and achieved the remedial action objectives established for
the project. The remedial action was evaluated in an alternatives analysis and was
determined to be protective of human health and the environment, compliant with
standards, criteria, and guidelines (SCGs), effective in the short-term, effective in the
long-term, capable of attaining appropriate levels of reduction of toxicity, mobility, or
volume of contaminated material, implementable, cost effective, acceptable to the
community, consistent with land uses, and sustainable.
A summary of the milestones achieved in the Remedial Action is as follows: A
Remedial Investigation (RI) was performed from May to July, 2011. A RI Report was
prepared to evaluate data and information necessary to develop a Remedial Action Work
Plan (RAWP). A Site Contact List was established. A RAWP was prepared and released
with a Fact Sheet on February 12, 2013 for a 30-day public comment period. The RAWP
and Stipulation List dated March 20, 2013 was approved by the New York City Office of
Environmental Remediation (OER) on November 09, 2011. A Fact Sheet providing
notice of the start of the remedial action was issued on February 2013. The remedial
action was begun in October, 2013 and completed in December, 2015.
The remedial action consisted of the following tasks:
1. Prepared a Community Protection Statement and implemented a Citizen
Participation Plan.
2. Performed a Community Air Monitoring Program for particulates and volatile
organic carbon compounds.
3. Selected NYSDEC Part 375 Track 1 Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
(SCOs).
4. Mobilized site security, equipment, utility mark outs and marking & staking
excavation areas.
5. Performed Waste Characterization Study prior to excavation activities. Eight (8)
soil borings were performed during the Phase II investigation of the Subject
property. Waste characterization soil samples were collected from these borings
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
23
on May 26, 2011. Waste characterization samples were collected at a frequency
dictated by disposal facility(s).
6. The following excavations were performed: soil was removed to a depth of 17
feet 6 inches from sidewalk grade beneath the area of the new building (entire
property). No landscaped or open areas exist on the Subject Property. The
building is setback 12’-3” from the curb on 125th Street and 13’-1” from the curb
on 126th Street. The building and cellar occupies the entire footprint of the lot.
Additional excavation occurred to 20.5 feet below sidewalk grade for the
elevator pits. A total of 5,978 cubic yards of soil/fill was excavated and removed
from the property.
7. Excavated 3,638 cubic yards of non-hazardous soil/fill and transported to Sky
Materials located at 4331 Middle Country Road in Calverton, NY 11933;
excavated 160 cubic yards of clean soil and transported to 55 Pearl Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201 utilizing the NYC Clean Soil Bank; excavated 2,180 cubic
yards of clean soil and transported to Fresh Kills in Staten Island utilizing the
NYC Clean Soil Bank.
8. Screened excavated soil/fill during intrusive work for indications of
contamination by visual means, odor, and monitoring with a PID.
9. Conducted materials management of excavated materials including temporarily
stockpiling and segregating in accordance with defined material types and to
prevent co-mingling of contaminated material and non-contaminated materials.
10. Appropriately segregated excavated media onsite prior to disposal. Transported
and disposed all soil/fill material at permitted facilities in accordance with all
applicable laws and regulations for handling, transport, and disposal, and the
RAWP.
11. Collected and analyzed end-point samples to determine attainment of SCOs.
Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs were achieved.
12. As part of development, constructed an engineered Composite Cover System
consisting of 2-feet of concrete slab underlain by #57 Stone. The contractor for
the cover construction was Nova Concrete Contractors.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
24
13. As part of development, installed a Vapor Barrier System that consisted of
Xypex Admix blended concrete mix to waterproof and protect the concrete
poured for the slab and basement walls. Aquifin Vaportight Coat SG2 (30 mils),
an interior applied barrier was also used to prevent capillary infiltration of oil,
Radon, and other gases and chemical from the ground and as a secondary
containment of water vapor. The product was applied to the below grade
concrete foundation walls and cellar floor slab. The contractor for the Vapor
Barrier System construction was Nova Concrete Contractors.
14. Performed all activities required for the Remedial Action, including permitting
requirements and pretreatment requirements, in compliance with applicable laws
and regulations.
15. Implemented storm-water pollution prevention measures in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations.
16. Submitted a Sustainability Report.
17. Submitted a RAR that describes the Remedial Action, certifies that the remedial
requirements defined in the Remedial Action Work Plan have been achieved;
defines the Site boundaries; and describes any changes from the RAWP.
3.0 COMPLIANCE WITH REMEDIAL ACTION WORK
PLAN
3.1 HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN
The remedial construction activities performed under this program were in
compliance with the Health and Safety Plan and applicable laws and regulations. The Site
Safety Coordinator was Joseph Loesch.
3.2 COMMUNITY AIR MONITORING PLAN
The Community Air Monitoring Plan provided for the collection and analysis of air
samples during remedial construction activities to ensure proper protections were
employed to protect workers and the neighboring community. Monitoring was
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
25
performed in compliance with the Community Air Monitoring Plan in the approved
RAWP. The results of Community Air monitoring are shown in Appendix 3.
3.3 SOIL/MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Soil/Materials Management Plan provided detailed plans for managing all
soil/materials that were disturbed at the Site, including excavation, handling, storage,
transport and disposal. It also included a series of controls to assure effective, nuisance
free remedial activity in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Remedial
construction activities performed under this program were in compliance with the SMMP
in the approved RAWP.
3.4 STORM-WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Storm water pollution prevention included physical methods and processes to control
and/or divert surface water flows and to limit the potential for erosion and migration of
Site soils, via wind or water. Remedial construction activities performed under this
program were in full compliance with methods and processes defined in the RAWP for
storm water prevention and applicable laws and regulations.
3.5 DEVIATIONS FROM THE REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN
All work performed was in accordance with the OER approved RAWP at this Site with
the exception of the following deviations:
Remediation did not achieve Track 1 SCOs. Alternative 2- Track 2
Residential SCOs were achieved.
On July 1, 2013 OER was notified by letter from H2M of the revised project
description details. The previous development included the construction of a 4-
story commercial/retail building. The new development includes a 6-story
building with bottom three (3) stories and a cellar for commercial/retail use while
top three (3) stories are for residential use. There were no significant changes to
the foundation depth or details for the new development compared to the previous
development plan. The concrete mat slab for the new building was installed at a
depth of 17’-6” below grade surface (bgs) compared to the previous development
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
26
depth of 16’-6” bgs. The total foundation area will be approximately 22,617 square
feet (s.f.). The total commercial/retail area including cellar will be approximately
99,225 s.f. The total residential area will be approximately 26,895 s.f. The building
will be set on a 2’-6” concrete mat slab with the bottom of the slab being set at an
elevation of 17’-6” bgs. The building will include two elevator pits and two escalator
pits set at elevations of 20’-6” bgs and 19’-8” bgs, respectively. The site has been
already excavated down to 10 feet bgs. The proposed depth of excavation will be
additional 7’-6” for the installation of the mat slab. The excavation depth for the
installation of the elevator and escalator pits will be additional 10’-6” and 9’-8”,
respectively. These changes are still protective of public health and environment.
Correspondence is attached in Appendix K.
On April 29, 2014 OER was notified by letter from Rosenbaum Design Group
Architecture of the revised vapor barrier product and specification. It was
determined that Aquafin Vaportight Coat SG2 to be an acceptable product to act
as an interior applied barrier to prevent capillary infiltration of oil, Radon, and
other gases and chemical from the ground and as a secondary containment of
water vapor. Xypex in the concrete was specified as the primary water
containment product. The product was applied to the below grade concrete
foundation walls and cellar floor slab. These changes are still protective of public
health and environment. Correspondence is attached in Appendix J.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
27
4.0 REMEDIAL PROGRAM
4.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION
Principal personnel who participated in the remedial action include CA 5-15 West
125th Street LLC as owners of the property and Harco Consultants Corp. as the
construction managers of the proposed redevelopment. Ms. Ela Obara of Harco
Consultants Corp. had the primary oversight of the overall development of this project.
The Professional Engineer (PE) for this project was H2M architects + engineers (H2M),
as environmental consultant to the ownership. Mr. Hardik Parekh, P.E. of H2M was the
primary point of contact and Mr. Joseph Loesch of H2M was field supervisor during the
implementation of this RAWP.
4.2 SITE CONTROLS
Site Preparation
Prior to the initiation of the remedial activities, the Site was secured with plywood
fencing throughout the perimeter of the lot. All appropriate New York City Department
of Building permits, and NYC OER fact sheets and signage sheets were placed on the
fence. An OER Project Notice was erected at the project entrance and was in place
during all phases of the Remedial Action. A sub-surface utility survey was conducted
prior to all excavation activities. All underground utilities were terminated.
Excavation activities at the Site began on October 28, 2013. Nova Concrete
Contractors was contracted by H&H Builders to perform the site excavation activities.
Daily tailgate safety meetings were conducted by H&H Builders/H2M prior to all
excavation activities at the Site. The site safety briefing included a discussion of
potential work-zone hazards, proper handling of dangerous tools and equipment and
avoidance of unsafe work conditions.
According the RAWP, real-time air monitoring for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and particulate levels at the perimeter of the exclusion zone or work
area was warranted during all intrusive soil excavation work. As part of the Community
Air Monitoring Program (CAMP) highlighted in the Remedial Action Work Plan, H2M
utilized a Thermo PDR 1000, a portable real-time dust particulate meter monitor with
data-logging capabilities to monitor the particulate concentration during the soil
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
28
excavation at the subject site. Additionally, H2M utilized a MiniRae 2000, a portable
photoionization detector to monitor VOC concentration.
An OER Project Notice was erected at the project entrance and was in place during
all phases of the Remedial Action.
Soil Screening
Soil excavation at 5 West 125th Street began on October 28, 2013. During excavation
activities, H2M conducted periodic visual/olfactory inspections of the soil being removed
from the Site. No issues of visual/olfactory contamination were encountered.
Additionally, a portable photoionization detector (PID) was utilized to screen for the
presence of volatile organic vapors within the work zone. Prior to entering the open
excavation, a fresh air calibration was performed to establish the background air of the
work zone. No exceedances in VOC concentrations were detected during excavation
activities at the subject property.
Stockpile Management
A total of 5,978 cubic yards of soil were excavated from the 5 West 125th Street property.
Soil stockpiles were appropriately graded to control run-off in accordance with the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for 5 West 125th Street. Since the site
was previously excavated, on-site stockpiles were maintained as the truck ramp.
Truck Inspection
Stockpiled and direct load out soils were removed to an off-site disposal facility, Fresh
Kills Landfill (Fresh Kills) in Staten Island, NY; 55 Pearl Street (Pearl Street) in
Brooklyn, NY; and Sky Materials in Calverton, NY. Soil manifests were documented for
all loads leaving the Site. Nova washed and brushed residual soils from all truck tires
prior to leaving the jobsite. All trucks were covered prior to leaving the jobsite.
Site Security
The excavation site was secured with plywood fencing throughout the perimeter of the
125th Street and 126th Street lot.
Nuisance Controls
No issues of odors, dust circulation or neighborhood complaints were encountered
throughout the duration of excavation activities at 5 West 125th Street.
Reporting
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
29
As requested by the OER, daily field reports were provided to the project manager. The
reports included a summary of daily field activities, locations of work zones, quantities of
soils excavated, status of on-site stockpiles, description of CAMP equipment location,
photographs of notable site conditions and activities and all relevant OER identification
numbers specific to the site. All daily and monthly reports are included in Appendix C.
Digital photographs of the Remedial Action are included in Appendix D.
4.3 MATERIALS EXCAVATION AND REMOVAL
Soil/Fill Excavation and Removal
. A total of 5,978 cubic yards of soil were excavated from the subject site. The initial
environmental investigation of 5 West 125th Street indicated that all soils excavated from
the subject site were suitable for off-site disposal. A map showing the location where
excavations were performed is shown in Figure 5. A map showing the approximate
source location of reused soil and the location of placement of reused soil is shown in
Figure 6. The Removal Action was performed under the oversight of Hardik Parekh.
Site work was performed by Nova Construction. Intrusive work began on October 28,
2013. CAMP was provided per the work plan during all activities involving soil
disturbance. Piles were driven along the perimeter of the site prior to any soil removal
activities were performed. Unused and scrap I-beams were removed from the Site as
necessary. Shoring was installed by NOVA along the eastern and western perimeter of
the property to prevent adjoining properties from shifting during construction. From
November 4, 2013 to November 7 a ramp dirt ramp was built in preparation for soil
transfer to 55 Pearl Street, Brooklyn as part of the OER Clean Soil Bank. A backhoe was
utilized to grade, stockpile and fill trucks with on-site soils. The ramp was built for truck
access from 126th Street and maintained in this orientation for the duration of the project.
From November 5, 2013 to November 6, 2013, piles were driven along 126th Street and
shoring installed. On November 11, 2013, a total of eight (8) 20-cubic yard truckloads of
clean soil were transferred from the Site to 55 Pearl Street, Brooklyn (OER Project#
11EHAN269M) by Jaym Trans LLC. Every effort was taken on-site to ensure that
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
30
construction and demolition materials were not transferred to 55 Pearl Street; however,
soils were not mechanically separated. Trucks were washed and covered before leaving
the Site. From December 11, 2013 through September 23, 2014, Nova Construction
stockpiled and maintained a ramp for soil disposal. From December 12, 2013 through
January 6, 2014, #57 stone was delivered to the site from Sky Materials located at 4331
Middle Country Rd in Calverton, NY 11933. A total of twenty-four (24) 36-yard trucks
dropped off #57 stone for underlayment of the concrete slab and removed soil for
disposal at the Sky Material facility. Gravel was initially placed along the southern edge
of the Site. The gravel was used to build an underlayment for the concrete pad. The site
was graded to a depth of 17’ – 6”. As the property was graded to this depth, incoming
stone was placed at the 17’ 6” below sidewalk grade. From December 20, 2013 through
April 2, 2014, one hundred nine (109) 20-cubic yard trucks were loaded with on-site soils
and disposed of through the OER Clean Soil Bank at the Fresh Kills Landfill in Staten
Island, NY. Gravel bedding commenced along the southern extents of the property and
continued along the western half of the property as soils were excavated. A vibratory
roller was used by Nova Construction to compact the stone underlayment. Nova
Construction began to install reinforced bar for the concrete slab on December 31, 2013.
Between January 6, 2014 and January 29, 2014, the south west corner of the mat slab was
poured. On January 20, 2014, H2M collected three end points (EP-3, EP-4, EP-5, EP-X)
from the middle and southern portions of the site based on the approved work plan. EP-
X was a blind duplicate quality control sample of EP-4. The end-points were collected at
a depth of 17’ -6” below sidewalk grade. Between January 29, 2014 and March 11, 2014,
an elevator pit was excavated and framed in the northwest corner of the property.
Between March 28, 2014 and April 2, 2014, the elevator pit in the northwest corner of the
property was reinforced and poured. The bottom elevation for the retail freight elevator
pit was 19’-1” below sidewalk grade. Between April 2, 2014 and June 16, 2014, the
western half of the property was framed, reinforced and poured. Walls along the southern
and western sides were also framed, reinforced and poured during this time. Support
columns throughout the cellar level were framed, reinforced and poured during this
period. Work was performed in July 2014, to bed, frame and reinforce the southeastern
portion of the property. By July 30, 2014, the soil ramp was only in the northeast corner
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
31
of the property. Nova Construction installed the first-floor decking on the western
portion of the property by this time. One cellar retail passenger elevator pit was installed
in August of 2014 in the southeast section of the Site to a total depth of 20’-3” below
sidewalk grade surface. End-point soil samples (EP-1, EP-2) were collected in the
northern portion of the property on September 15, 2014. By September 17, 2014, first-
floor decking was installed on the southern portion of the property. The final soil
removal from the Site occurred on September 23, 2014.
All slab and foundation wall concrete was poured with Xypex additive to ensure it is
vapor and liquid tight. Additionally, upon completion of the cellar, Nova Construction
applied 30 mils thickness Aquafin Vaportight Coat SG2 to the interior walls and cellar
slab. Inspections of the coating were performed by H2M on November 18, 2014,
December 10, 2015 and May 13, 2015. The inspections confirmed the proper installation
of the vapor barrier.
Permitting for dewatering was performed by Kosuri Engineering & Consulting P.C. A
Permit Application for Water Quality Control dated April 10, 2013 is attached as
Appendix L. The scope of work involved installation of dewatering sump and system
around the vacant site for the construction of a basement for a building. The work
involved installation of a sump pit in a controlled excavation to create a sump and install
a sump pump in order to pump water collected the sump pit to keep the allowable
pumping rates not to exceed the discharge limits of 9,500 gallons per day. The intention
was to limit the discharge to 9,500 gallons per day by performing controlled dewatering
areas to accomplish the intent of the design and limit the construction area to limit the
dewatering rates. On February 12, 2013 Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C.
collected the dewatering sample on behalf of Harco Consultants and submitted to York
Analytical Laboratories. The sample was analyzed for NYCDEP Discharge Limitation
for Effluent to Sanitary or Combined Sewers. The excavation was dewatered by
pumping groundwater and passing it through a treatment system and discharging it into
36” combined sewer located on 125th Street. The pre-treatment system consisted of a
settling tank and an oil water separator tank.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
32
Soil Cleanup Objectives
The SCOs for this Remedial Action are NYSDEC Part 375 Track 1 Unrestricted Use
SCOs.
End Point Sample Results
Following the completion of the site excavation to a depth of 17’ 6” feet below sidewalk
grade surface, H2M collected post excavation samples from five locations as depicted in
the OER-approved end point sampling plan. The endpoint samples were labeled EP-1 to
EP-5 and collected from a depth of 17’ 6” below sidewalk grade. The samples were
submitted for analysis to NYS DOH ELAP certified York Analytical Laboratories of
Stratford Connecticut for the following parameters:
Volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260;
Semi-volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8270;
Target Analyte List metals; and
Pesticides/PCBs by EPA Method 8081/8082.
Laboratory results were compared to NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 375 Soil Cleanup
Objectives for Track 1 Unrestricted Use and Track 2 Residential Use.
Additionally, a blind duplicate of EP-4 (EP-X was collected to fulfill quality
assurance/quality control requirements. EP-X was analyzed for the same parameters as
the other five post-excavation samples collected.
A map of end-point sample locations is shown in Figure 4. A tabular summary of
end-point sampling results compared to SCO’s is included in Table 1. As shown on Table
1, endpoint samples showed no VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, or PCBs detected above Track
1 SCOs. Endpoints samples detected chromium (max. 9.11 ppm), lead (max. 186 ppm),
and zinc (max. 126 ppm) above Track 1 SCOs. However, these detections were below
Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs.
The SCOs for this project were not achieved. However, Track 2 Restricted
Residential SCOs, which are appropriate for the use of the property, were achieved.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
33
4.4 MATERIALS DISPOSAL
The material type, quantity and disposal location of material removed and disposed off-
Site is presented below:
Disposal Location/Address Type of Material Quantity
Sky Materials
4331 Middle Country Road
Calverton, NY 11933
Non-Hazardous
Soil 3,638 cubic yards
Fresh Kills Landfill
Staten Island, NY 10312
Clean Soil in NYC
Clean Soil Bank 2,180 cub yards
55 Pearl Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Clean Soil in NYC
Clean Soil Bank 160 cubic yards
Materials were removed from the Site beginning October 2013 and ending September
2014. Letters from CA 5-15 125TH Street LLC and HARCO Consultants Corporation to
disposal facility providing materials type, source and data, and acceptance letters from
disposal facility stating it is approved to accept above materials are attached in Appendix
E. Manifests are included in Appendix F. Characterization sample results are presented in
Appendix G. Table 6 summarizes the shipping date, trucking company name and truck
license plate number, and tonnage for each truck load.
4.5 BACKFILL IMPORT
Approximately 864 cubic yard of ¾” and 57 stone off-site backfill material was
imported to the Site by Sky Materials in Calverton, NY. The stone was spread over the
site and compacted prior to pouring the concrete slab on-site.
4.6 DEMARACTION
Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs were achieved.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
34
5.0 ENGINEERING CONTROLS
A Track 2 Restricted Residential Remedial Action was achieved and Engineering
Controls are not required. However, as part of construction, several protective systems
were installed. These are:
(1) a Composite Cover System consisting of a 2 feet concrete building slab across
the building footprint;
(2) Vapor Barrier System;
Composite Cover System
As part of development, an engineered Composite Cover System has been built on the
Site. This Composite Cover System is comprised of
2-feet of reinforced concrete slab across the building footprint (entire site) underlain by
#57 stone. The contractor for the Composite Cover System construction was Nova
Concrete Contractors.
Appendix I shows the as-built design for each remedial cover type used on this Site.
Figure 7 and Figure 9 shows the location of each cover type built at the Site.
Photographs of construction of the Composite Cover System are included in Appendix D.
Vapor Barrier System
As part of development, a Vapor Barrier System has been built on the Site. This
Vapor Barrier System consists of Xypex Admix blended concrete mix to waterproof and
protect the concrete poured for the slab and basement walls. Aquifin Vaportight Coat
SG2 (30 mils), an interior applied barrier was also used to prevent capillary infiltration of
oil, Radon, and other gases and chemical from the ground and acts as a secondary
containment of water vapor. The product was applied to the below grade concrete
foundation walls and cellar floor slab. Appendix I shows the as-built drawings for the
vapor barrier and concrete foundation as well as manufacturer documentation for the
waterproofing and vapor sealer. Photographs of the construction of the vapor barrier
system are included in Appendix D. The professional engineer for the Vapor Barrier
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
35
System was Hardik Parekh. The contractor for the Vapor Barrier System construction
was Nova Concrete Contractors.
Figure 10 shows the as-built design for the Vapor Barrier System used on this
Site. Photographs of installation of the Vapor Barrier System are included in Appendix
D. A copy of the certificate of warranty is included in Appendix J.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
36
6.0 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
A Track 2 Restricted Residential Remedial Action was achieved and Engineering
Controls and Institutional Controls are not required.
7.0 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN
A Track 2 Restricted Residential Remedial Action was achieved and Site
Management is not required.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
37
8.0 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
This Remedial Action Work Plan provides for sustainable remediation and
redevelopment through a variety of means that are defined in this Sustainability Report.
Reuse of Clean, Recyclable Materials. Reuse of clean, recyclable materials reduces
consumption of non-renewable virgin resources and can provide energy savings and
greenhouse gas reduction since these materials can be locally-derived.
An estimate of the tonnage of recycled material reused on this project is 30 tons
of onsite soil. An estimated 2,340 tons of clean soil were transferred to accepting sites
within the NYC Clean Soil Bank.
Conservation of Non-Renewable Resources. Reduced consumption of non-
renewable resources such as soil and top-soil lowers the overall environmental impact of
the project on the region by conserving these resources.
Conservation of non-renewable resources was achieved by avoidance of the use of
virgin soil as backfill for completed excavation. An estimate of the tonnage of non-
renewable resources, the use of which will be avoided under this plan, is 30 tons.
Recontamination Control. Recontamination after cleanup and redevelopment is
completed undermines the value of work performed, may result in a property that is less
protective of public health or the environment, and may necessitate additional cleanup
work later that could impede future redevelopment. Recontamination can arise from
future releases that occur within the property or by influx of existing contamination from
off-Site.
To prevent the transport of contamination to the site from off-site sources, a vapor
barrier was incorporated into the foundation of the new building. Also, during the
removal of contaminated soil from the site, all trucks were washed at the exit to prevent
any contamination leaving the site that could potentially re-contaminate the property. In
addition, the entire site is covered with a composite cover system that will reduce the
potential for contamination of soil from the land surface. The area of the Site that utilizes
re-contamination controls under this plan is 27,500 square feet.
Paperless Brownfield Cleanup Program. CA 5-15 125th Street and HARCO
Consultants Corporation participated in OER’s Paperless Brownfield Cleanup Program.
5 West 125th Street Remedial Action Report
December, 2016
38
Under this program, submission of electronic documents replaced submission of hard
copies for the review of project documents, communications and milestone reports. A
best estimate of the mass (pounds) of paper saved under this plan is 30 pounds.
Low-Energy Project Management Program. CA 5-15 125th Street and HARCO
Consultants Corporation participated in OER’s low-energy project management program.
Under this program, whenever possible, meetings were held using remote communication
technologies, such as videoconferencing and teleconferencing to reduce energy
consumption and traffic congestion associated with personal transportation. A gross
estimate of the number of miles of personal transportation that was conserved in this
process is 1,000 miles.
FIGURE 1
SITE BOUNDARY MAP
FIGURE 2
SITE LOCATION
FIGURE 3
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FIGURE 4
MAP OF END-POINT SAMPLE LOCATIONS
FIGURE 5
MAP SHOWING LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF EXCAVATIONS
FIGURE 6
MAP OF SOIL/FILL REUSE AND BACKFILL PLACEMENT LOCATIONS
FIGURE 7
MAP OF LOCATION OF COMPOSITE COVER SYSTEM
FIGURE 8
MAP OF LOCATION OF VAPOR BARRIER SYSTEM
FIGURE 9
AS-BUILT DESIGN DETAIL FOR VAPOR BARRIER SYSTEM
FIGURE 10
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FIGURE 11
ELEVATOR PIT PLAN
FIGURE 12
CELLAR LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
FIGURE 13
FOUNDATION SECTIONS AND DETAILS
FIGURE 14
FIRST FLOOR REPLECTED CEILING PLAN
FIGURE 15 - 18
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
FIGURE 19
FOUNDATION PLAN
FIGURE 20 - 24
SECTIONS VIEWS
TABLE 1-4
SUMMARY OF END-POINT ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample ID: EP-1 EP-2 EP-3 EP-4 EP-5 EP-X
Sample Depth: 16' 16' 18' 18' 18' 18'
Sample Date: 9/15/2014 9/15/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014
Lab No.: 14I0951-01 14I0951-02 14A0898-01 14A0898-02 14A0898-03 14A0898-04
Sample Matrix: Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Units: ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 680 100,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,1,2-Trichloroethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,1-Dichloroethane 270 19,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,1-Dichloroethylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,1-Dichloropropylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2,3-Trichloropropane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3,600 47,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2-Dibromoethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,100 100,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2-Dichloroethane 20 2,300 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,2-Dichloropropane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8,400 47,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2,400 17,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,3-Dichloropropane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,800 9,800 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
1,4-Dioxane 100 9,800 <53 <2.8 <22 <21 <22 <20
2,2-Dichloropropane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
2-Butanone NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
2-Chlorotoluene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
4-Chlorotoluene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Acetone 50 100,000 <5.3 6.5 J,B 3.0 J,B 3.6 CCV-E, J 3.8 CCV-E, J 4.1 CCV-E
Benzene 60 2,900 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Bromobenzene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Bromochloromethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Bromodichloromethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Bromoform NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Bromomethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Carbon tetrachloride 760 1,400 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Chlorobenzene 1,100 100,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Chloroethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Chloroform 370 10,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Chloromethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Dibromochloromethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Dibromomethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Dichlorodifluoromethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Ethyl Benzene 1,000 30,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Hexachlorobutadiene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Isopropylbenzene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Methyl tert-butyl ether 930 62,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Methylene chloride 50 51,000 <5.3 <5.6 <2.2 <2.3 <1.1 <0.99
Naphthalene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 4.2 J 3.3 J 2.3 J
n-Butylbenzene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
n-Propylbenzene 3,900 100,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
o-Xylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
p- & m-Xylenes NS NS <5.3 <5.6 <2.2 <2.1 <2.2 <2.0
p-Isopropyltoluene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
sec-Butylbenzene 11,000 100,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Styrene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
tert-Butylbenzene 5,900 100,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Tetrachloroethene 1,300 5,500 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Toluene 700 100,000 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Trichloroethylene NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Trichlorofluoromethane NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Vinyl Chloride 20 210 <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <0.99
Xylene (total) 260 100,000 <8.0 <8.4 <3.3 <3.2 <3.3 <3.0
Vinyl acetate NS NS <2.7 <2.8 <1.1 <1.2 <1.1 <0.99
NS: No Standard Established.CCV-E: The value reported is estimated due to its behavior during continuing calibration verificationJ: Detected below the Reporting Limit but greater than or equal to the Method Detection LimitB: Analyte is found in the associated batch blankug/kg…micrograms per kilogramEP-X blind duplicate sample as part of the QA/QC analysis
Table 1
Endpoint Soil Samples Volatile Organic Analytical Results
5 West 125th Street, New York, NY
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(a)
Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(b)
Residential Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Volatile Organic Compounds - EPA Method 8260
Sample ID: EP-1 EP-2 EP-3 EP-4 EP-5 EP-X
Sample Depth: 16' 16' 18' 18' 18' 18'
Sample Date: 9/15/2014 9/15/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014
Lab No.: 14I0951-01 14I0951-02 14A0898-01 14A0898-02 14A0898-03 14A0898-04
Sample Matrix: Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Units: ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg
Acenaphthene 20,000 100,000 <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Acenaphthylene 100,000 100,000 <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Aniline NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Anthracene 100,000 100,000 <425 <428 <45.6 53.7 J 65.4 J <45
Benzo(a)anthracene 1,000 1,000 <425 571 J <45.6 119 J 79.6 J 75 J
Benzo(a)pyrene 1,000 1,000 <425 <428 <45.6 56.5 J <45.8 58.6 J
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1,000 1,000 <425 <428 <45.6 78.7 J <45.8 <45
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 100,000 100,000 <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Benzyl alcohol NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 800 1,000 <425 <428 <45.6 84.6 J 60.7 J 58.2 J
Benzyl butyl phthalate NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
4-Chloroaniline NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2-Chloronaphthalene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2-Chlorophenol NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Chrysene 1,000 1,000 <425 554 J <45.6 118 J 87.6 J 83.6
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 330 330 <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Dibenzofuran NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Di-n-butyl phthalate NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine NS NS <1690 <1700 <181 <176 <182 <179
2,4-Dichlorophenol NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Diethyl phthalate NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2,4-Dimethylphenol NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Dimethyl phthalate NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
2,4-Dinitrophenol NS NS <1690 <1700 <181 <176 <182 <179
2,6-Dinitrotoluene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2,4-Dinitrotoluene NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Di-n-octyl phthalate NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Fluoranthene 100,000 100,000 945 J 1260 J <45.6 <44.2 232 200
Fluorene 30,000 100,000 <425 <428 <45.6 320 <45.8 <45
Hexachlorobenzene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Hexachlorobutadiene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Hexachloroethane NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 500 500 <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Isophorone NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2-Methylnaphthalene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2-Methylphenol NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
3- & 4-Methylphenols NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Naphthalene 12,000 100,000 <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
3-Nitroaniline NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
2-Nitroaniline NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
4-Nitroaniline NS NS <851 <428 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Nitrobenzene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
4-Nitrophenol NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
2-Nitrophenol NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
N-Nitrosodimethylamine NS NS <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Pentachlorophenol 800 2,400 <851 <857 <91.2 <88.5 <91.6 <90
Phenanthrene 100,000 100,000 861 J 796 J <45.6 236 250 139 J
Phenol 330 100000 <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
Pyrene 100,000 100,000 847 J 1150 J <45.6 292 205 187
Pyridine NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NS NS <425 <428 <45.6 <44.2 <45.8 <45
NS : No standard establishedJ: Detected below the Reporting Limit but greater than or equal to the Method Detection Limitug/kg…micrograms per kilogramEP-X blind duplicate sample as part of the QA/QC analysis
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(a)
Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(b)
Residential Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Table 2
Endpoint Soil Samples Sem-Volatile Organic Analytical Results
5 West 125th Street, New York, NY
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds - EPA Method 8270
Sample ID: EP-1 EP-2 EP-3 EP-4 EP-5 EP-X
Sample Depth: 16' 16' 18' 18' 18' 18'
Sample Date: 9/15/2014 9/15/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014
Lab No.: 14I0951-01 14I0951-02 14A0898-01 14A0898-02 14A0898-03 14A0898-04
Sample Matrix: Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Units: mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Aluminum NS NS 4170 4500 1790 2220 2430 2490
Antimony NS NS <0.506 <0.510 <0.543 0.73 <0.545 <0.536
Arsenic 13 16 1.7 1.64 <1.09 <1.05 1.36 <1.07
Barium 350 350 152 156 17.2 39.2 36 46.7
Beryllium 7.2 14 <0.101 <0.102 <0.109 <0.105 <0.109 <0.107
Cadmium 2.5 2.5 <0.304 <0.306 <0.326 <0.316 <0.327 <0.322
Calcium NS NS 7680 9110 477 1700 774 1870
Chromium+ 30 36 9.01 9.11 7.05 6.15 5.65 5.85
Cobalt NS NS 4.52 4.15 2.22 2.67 3.47 3.41
Copper 50 270 22.2 18.1 7.92 10.6 13.3 11.7
Iron NS NS 8280 9090 4160 3930 5480 4600
Lead 63 400 165 186 2.34 35 16.2 36.9
Magnesium NS NS 2870 2970 1080 947 1220 1400
Manganese 1,600 2,000 430 341 294 316 105 358
Nickel 30 140 10.9 8.51 6.34 6.26 10.2 7.52
Potassium NS NS 926 836 394 392 573 435
Selenium 3.9 36 <1.01 <1.02 <1.09 <1.05 <1.09 <1.07
Silver 2 36 <0.506 <0.510 <0.543 <0.527 <0.545 <0.536
Sodium NS NS 120 115 27.8 81.4 50.9 75.1
Thallium NS NS <1.01 <1.02 <1.09 <1.05 <1.09 <1.07
Vanadium NS NS 13.6 12.2 5.81 6.38 7.76 7.63
Zinc 109 2,200 112 126 10.5 33.7 25.3 30.3
Mercury 0.18 0.81 0.0796 0.0829 <0.0326 <0.0316 <0.0327 <0.0322
NS : No standard establishedJ: Detected below the Reporting Limit but greater than or equal to the Method Detection Limit+: Guidance value for trivalent ChromiumYellow shaded values indicated exceedances of the Unrestricted Use SCOs, but below the Residential Use SCOsmg/kg…miligram per kilogramEP-X blind duplicate sample as part of the QA/QC analysis
Mercury by EPA Method 7473
Table 3
Endpoint Soil Samples Metals Analytical Results
5 West 125th Street, New York, NY
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(a)
Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(b)
Residential Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Metals (Target Analyte List)
Sample ID: EP-1 EP-2 EP-3 EP-4 EP-5 EP-X
Sample Depth: 16' 16' 18' 18' 18' 18'
Sample Date: 9/15/2014 9/15/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014 1/29/2014
Lab No.: 14I0951-01 14I0951-02 14A0898-01 14A0898-02 14A0898-03 14A0898-04
Sample Matrix: Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Units: ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg
Toxaphene NS NS <84.6 <85.2 <90.6 <88 <91.1 <89.5
Methoxychlor NS NS <8.36 <8.42 <8.95 <8.69 <9 <8.84
Heptachlor epoxide NS NS <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Heptachlor 42 420 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
gamma-BHC (Lindane) 100 280 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Endrin ketone NS NS <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Endrin aldehyde NS NS <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Endrin 14 2,200 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Endosulfan sulfate 2,400 4,800 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Endosulfan II 2,400 4,800 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Endosulfan I 2,400 4,800 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Dieldrin 5 39 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
delta-BHC 40 100 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
gamma-Chlordane NS NS <1.67 <1.68 - - - -
alpha-Chlordane 20 910 <66.8 <67.3 - - - -
Chlordane, total NS NS <1.67 <1.68 <7.16 <6.95 <7.20 <7.07
beta-BHC 36 72 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
alpha-BHC 20 97 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Aldrin 5 19 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
4,4'-DDT 3.3 1,700 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
4,4'-DDE 3.3 1,800 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
4,4'-DDD 3.3 2,600 <1.67 <1.68 <1.79 <1.74 <1.80 <1.77
Units: ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg
Aroclor 1260 NS NS <16.9 <17.0 <18.5 <17.9 <18.5 <18.2
Aroclor 1254 NS NS <16.9 <17.0 <18.5 <17.9 <18.5 <18.2
Aroclor 1248 NS NS <16.9 <17.0 <18.5 <17.9 <18.5 <18.2
Aroclor 1242 NS NS <16.9 <17.0 <18.5 <17.9 <18.5 <18.2
Aroclor 1232 NS NS <16.9 <17.0 <18.5 <17.9 <18.5 <18.2
Aroclor 1221 NS NS <16.9 <17.0 <18.5 <17.9 <18.5 <18.2
Aroclor 1016 NS NS <16.9 <17.0 <18.5 <17.9 <18.5 <18.2
Total PCBs 100 100 <16.9* <17.0* <7.38 <7.16 <7.41 <7.29NS : No standard established-: Not analyzed for*: Analyte is not certified or the state of the samples origination does not offer certification for the Analytemg/kg…miligram per kilogramug/kg…micrograms per kilogramEP-X blind duplicate sample as part of the QA/QC analysis
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)-EPA Method 8082
Table 4
Endpoint Soil Samples Pesticides/PCBs Analytical Results
5 West 125th Street, New York, NY
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(a)
Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(b)
Residential Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Pesticides - EPA Method 8081
TABLE 5
LIST OF SCO’S
6-6
375-6.8 Soil cleanup objective tables.(a) Unrestricted use soil cleanup objectives.
Table 375-6.8(a):Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CAS Number Unrestricted Use
Metals
Arsenic 7440-38-2 13 c
Barium 7440-39-3 350 c
Beryllium 7440-41-7 7.2
Cadmium 7440-43-9 2.5 c
Chromium, hexavalent e 18540-29-9 1b
Chromium, trivalent e 16065-83-1 30 c
Copper 7440-50-8 50
Total Cyanide e, f 27
Lead 7439-92-1 63 c
Manganese 7439-96-5 1600 c
Total Mercury 0.18 c
Nickel 7440-02-0 30
Selenium 7782-49-2 3.9c
Silver 7440-22-4 2
Zinc 7440-66-6 109 c
PCBs/Pesticides
2,4,5-TP Acid (Silvex) f 93-72-1 3.8
4,4’-DDE 72-55-9 0.0033 b
4,4’-DDT 50-29-3 0.0033 b
4,4’-DDD 72-54-8 0.0033 b
Aldrin 309-00-2 0.005 c
alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.02
beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.036
Chlordane (alpha) 5103-71-9 0.094
TABLE 3 - SOIL CLEANUP OBJECTIVES
Table 375-6.8(a):Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CAS Number Unrestricted Use
6-7
delta-BHC g 319-86-8 0.04
Dibenzofuran f 132-64-9 7
Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.005 c
Endosulfan I d, f 959-98-8 2.4
Endosulfan II d, f 33213-65-9 2.4
Endosulfan sulfate d, f 1031-07-8 2.4
Endrin 72-20-8 0.014
Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.042
Lindane 58-89-9 0.1
Polychlorinated biphenyls 1336-36-3 0.1
Semivolatile organic compounds
Acenaphthene 83-32-9 20
Acenapthylene f 208-96-8 100 a
Anthracene f 120-12-7 100 a
Benz(a)anthracene f 56-55-3 1c
Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1c
Benzo(b)fluoranthene f 205-99-2 1c
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene f 191-24-2 100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene f 207-08-9 0.8 c
Chrysene f 218-01-9 1c
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene f 53-70-3 0.33 b
Fluoranthene f 206-44-0 100 a
Fluorene 86-73-7 30
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene f 193-39-5 0.5 c
m-Cresol f 108-39-4 0.33 b
Naphthalene f 91-20-3 12
o-Cresol f 95-48-7 0.33 b
Table 375-6.8(a):Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CAS Number Unrestricted Use
6-8
p-Cresol f 106-44-5 0.33 b
Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 0.8 b
Phenanthrene f 85-01-8 100
Phenol 108-95-2 0.33 b
Pyrene f 129-00-0 100
Volatile organic compounds
1,1,1-Trichloroethane f 71-55-6 0.68
1,1-Dichloroethane f 75-34-3 0.27
1,1-Dichloroethene f 75-35-4 0.33
1,2-Dichlorobenzene f 95-50-1 1.1
1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.02 c
cis -1,2-Dichloroethene f 156-59-2 0.25
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene f 156-60-5 0.19
1,3-Dichlorobenzene f 541-73-1 2.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 1.8
1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 0.1 b
Acetone 67-64-1 0.05
Benzene 71-43-2 0.06
n-Butylbenzene f 104-51-8 12
Carbon tetrachloride f 56-23-5 0.76
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 1.1
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.37
Ethylbenzene f 100-41-4 1
Hexachlorobenzene f 118-74-1 0.33b
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 0.12
Methyl tert-butyl ether f 1634-04-4 0.93
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.05
Table 375-6.8(a):Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CAS Number Unrestricted Use
6-9
n - Propylbenzene f 103-65-1 3.9
sec-Butylbenzene f 135-98-8 11
tert-Butylbenzene f 98-06-6 5.9
Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 1.3
Toluene 108-88-3 0.7
Trichloroethene 79-01-6 0.47
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene f 95-63-6 3.6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenef 108-67-8 8.4
Vinyl chloridef 75-01-4 0.02
Xylene (mixed) 1330-20-7 0.26All soil cleanup objectives (SCOs) are in parts per million (ppm).
Footnotesa The SCOs for unrestricted use were capped at a maximum value of 100 ppm. See Technical SupportDocument (TSD), section 9.3.b For constituents where the calculated SCO was lower than the contract required quantitation limit (CRQL), theCRQL is used as the Track 1 SCO value.c For constituents where the calculated SCO was lower than the rural soil background concentration, asdetermined by the Department and Department of Health rural soil survey, the rural soil backgroundconcentration is used as the Track 1 SCO value for this use of the site.d SCO is the sum of endosulfan I, endosulfan II and endosulfan sulfate.e The SCO for this specific compound (or family of compounds) is considered to be met if the analysis for thetotal species of this contaminant is below the specific SCO. f Protection of ecological resources SCOs were not developed for contaminants identified in Table 375-6.8(b)with “NS”. Where such contaminants appear in Table 375-6.8(a), the applicant may be required by theDepartment to calculate a protection of ecological resources SCO according to the TSD.
6-10
(b) Restricted use soil cleanup objectives.
Table 375-6.8(b): Restricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CASNumber
Protection of Public Health Protectionof
EcologicalResources
Protectionof
Ground-waterResidential Restricted-
Residential Commercial Industrial
Metals
Arsenic 7440-38-2 16f 16f 16f 16f 13f 16f
Barium 7440-39-3 350f 400 400 10,000 d 433 820
Beryllium 7440-41-7 14 72 590 2,700 10 47
Cadmium 7440-43-9 2.5f 4.3 9.3 60 4 7.5
Chromium, hexavalent h 18540-29-9 22 110 400 800 1e 19
Chromium, trivalent h 16065-83-1 36 180 1,500 6,800 41 NS
Copper 7440-50-8 270 270 270 10,000 d 50 1,720
Total Cyanide h 27 27 27 10,000 d NS 40
Lead 7439-92-1 400 400 1,000 3,900 63f 450
Manganese 7439-96-5 2,000f 2,000f 10,000 d 10,000 d 1600f 2,000f
Total Mercury 0.81j 0.81j 2.8j 5.7j 0.18f 0.73
Nickel 7440-02-0 140 310 310 10,000 d 30 130
Selenium 7782-49-2 36 180 1,500 6,800 3.9f 4f
Silver 7440-22-4 36 180 1,500 6,800 2 8.3
Zinc 7440-66-6 2200 10,000 d 10,000 d 10,000 d 109f 2,480
PCBs/Pesticides
2,4,5-TP Acid (Silvex) 93-72-1 58 100a 500b 1,000c NS 3.8
4,4’-DDE 72-55-9 1.8 8.9 62 120 0.0033 e 17
4,4’-DDT 50-29-3 1.7 7.9 47 94 0.0033 e 136
4,4’- DDD 72-54-8 2.6 13 92 180 0.0033 e 14
Aldrin 309-00-2 0.019 0.097 0.68 1.4 0.14 0.19
alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.097 0.48 3.4 6.8 0.04g 0.02
beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.072 0.36 3 14 0.6 0.09
Chlordane (alpha) 5103-71-9 0.91 4.2 24 47 1.3 2.9
Table 375-6.8(b): Restricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CASNumber
Protection of Public Health Protectionof
EcologicalResources
Protectionof
Ground-waterResidential Restricted-
Residential Commercial Industrial
6-11
delta-BHC 319-86-8 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 0.04g 0.25
Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 14 59 350 1,000c NS 210
Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.039 0.2 1.4 2.8 0.006 0.1
Endosulfan I 959-98-8 4.8i 24i 200i 920i NS 102
Endosulfan II 33213-65-9 4.8i 24i 200i 920i NS 102
Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 4.8i 24i 200i 920i NS 1,000c
Endrin 72-20-8 2.2 11 89 410 0.014 0.06
Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.42 2.1 15 29 0.14 0.38
Lindane 58-89-9 0.28 1.3 9.2 23 6 0.1
Polychlorinated biphenyls 1336-36-3 1 1 1 25 1 3.2
Semivolatiles
Acenaphthene 83-32-9 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 20 98
Acenapthylene 208-96-8 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 107
Anthracene 120-12-7 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 1,000c
Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 1f 1f 5.6 11 NS 1f
Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1f 1f 1f 1.1 2.6 22
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 1f 1f 5.6 11 NS 1.7
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 191-24-2 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 1,000c
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 1 3.9 56 110 NS 1.7
Chrysene 218-01-9 1f 3.9 56 110 NS 1f
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.33e 0.33e 0.56 1.1 NS 1,000c
Fluoranthene 206-44-0 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 1,000c
Fluorene 86-73-7 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 30 386
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5f 0.5f 5.6 11 NS 8.2
m-Cresol 108-39-4 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.33e
Naphthalene 91-20-3 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 12
Table 375-6.8(b): Restricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CASNumber
Protection of Public Health Protectionof
EcologicalResources
Protectionof
Ground-waterResidential Restricted-
Residential Commercial Industrial
6-12
o-Cresol 95-48-7 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.33e
p-Cresol 106-44-5 34 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.33e
Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.4 6.7 6.7 55 0.8e 0.8e
Phenanthrene 85-01-8 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 1,000c
Phenol 108-95-2 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 30 0.33e
Pyrene 129-00-0 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 1,000c
Volatiles
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.68
1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 19 26 240 480 NS 0.27
1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.33
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 1.1
1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 2.3 3.1 30 60 10 0.02f
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 59 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.25
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.19
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 17 49 280 560 NS 2.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 9.8 13 130 250 20 1.8
1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 9.8 13 130 250 0.1e 0.1e
Acetone 67-64-1 100a 100b 500b 1,000c 2.2 0.05
Benzene 71-43-2 2.9 4.8 44 89 70 0.06
Butylbenzene 104-51-8 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 12
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.4 2.4 22 44 NS 0.76
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 40 1.1
Chloroform 67-66-3 10 49 350 700 12 0.37
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 30 41 390 780 NS 1
Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 0.33e 1.2 6 12 NS 3.2
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 100a 0.12
Table 375-6.8(b): Restricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives
Contaminant CASNumber
Protection of Public Health Protectionof
EcologicalResources
Protectionof
Ground-waterResidential Restricted-
Residential Commercial Industrial
6-13
Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 62 100a 500b 1,000c NS 0.93
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 51 100a 500b 1,000c 12 0.05
n-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 3.9
sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 11
tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 100a 100a 500b 1,000c NS 5.9
Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 5.5 19 150 300 2 1.3
Toluene 108-88-3 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 36 0.7
Trichloroethene 79-01-6 10 21 200 400 2 0.47
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 47 52 190 380 NS 3.6
1,3,5- Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 47 52 190 380 NS 8.4
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 0.21 0.9 13 27 NS 0.02
Xylene (mixed) 1330-20-7 100a 100a 500b 1,000c 0.26 1.6All soil cleanup objectives (SCOs) are in parts per million (ppm).
NS=Not specified. See Technical Support Document (TSD).
Footnotesa The SCOs for residential, restricted-residential and ecological resources use were capped at a maximum valueof 100 ppm. See TSD section 9.3.b The SCOs for commercial use were capped at a maximum value of 500 ppm. See TSD section 9.3.c The SCOs for industrial use and the protection of groundwater were capped at a maximum value of 1000 ppm. See TSD section 9.3.d The SCOs for metals were capped at a maximum value of 10,000 ppm. See TSD section 9.3.e For constituents where the calculated SCO was lower than the contract required quantitation limit (CRQL), theCRQL is used as the SCO value.f For constituents where the calculated SCO was lower than the rural soil background concentration asdetermined by the Department and Department of Health rural soil survey, the rural soil backgroundconcentration is used as the Track 2 SCO value for this use of the site.g This SCO is derived from data on mixed isomers of BHC.h The SCO for this specific compound (or family of compounds) is considered to be met if the analysis for thetotal species of this contaminant is below the specific SCO. i This SCO is for the sum of endosulfan I, endosulfan II, and endosulfan sulfate.j This SCO is the lower of the values for mercury (elemental) or mercury (inorganic salts). See TSD Table 5.6-1.
1 Original should read “Tables 375-6.8(a) and (b)”
6-14
375-6.9 Development or modification of soil cleanup objectives.(a) Applicability. This section identifies when and the procedures under which a contaminant-
specific soil cleanup objective may be developed or modified.(1) Soil cleanup objectives for contaminants not included in Tables 375-6.8(a) and (b) may be
developed by the remedial party or required by the Department.(2) Soil cleanup objectives for contaminants included in Tables 375-6.8(a) and (b), may be
modified based on site-specific data if desired by the remedial party; as set forth in:(i) subpart 375-3 for Tracks 3 or 4, as set forth in paragraphs 375-3.8(e)(3) or (4),
respectively; or(ii) subparts 375-2 and 375-4, as set forth in subparagraph 375-2.8(b)(1)(iii) and
subparagraph 375-4.8(c)(1)(iii).(3) Protection of ecological resources soil cleanup objectives were not developed for certain
contaminants, which are identified in Table 375-6.8(b) as “NS”. Where such contaminants: (i) appear in Table 375-6.8(a), the applicant may be required by the Department to
calculate a protection of ecological resources soil cleanup objective for the contaminant for use in Track 1 andapply such soil cleanup objective where it is lower than the soil cleanup objective set forth in Table 375-6.8(a);or
(ii) are identified as impacting or threatening an ecological resource for a restricteduse remedial program the Department may require a protection of ecological resources soil cleanup objective bedeveloped.
(b) New soil cleanup objectives must:(1) Be developed utilizing the same methodologies that were used by the Department to
develop the respective soil cleanup objective, as provided in the Technical Support Document.(2) Apply the following caps, as set forth in section 9.3 of the Technical Support Document,
on any soil cleanup objective included in Tables 375-6.8(a) and (b), with the exception of metals, as set forth inparagraph (3) below, developed for:
(i) unrestricted use, residential use, restricted-residential use and the protection ofecological resources, a maximum value of 100 ppm;
(ii) commercial use, a maximum value of 500 ppm; and(iii) industrial use and the protection of groundwater a maximum value of 1000 ppm,
and(3) Apply a cap for metals at a maximum value of 10,000 ppm.
(c) Development of unrestricted use soil cleanup objectives. The unrestricted use soil cleanupobjective for a compound will be the lowest of the soil cleanup values, calculated as set forth in appendix E ofthe Technical Support Document, for the protection of groundwater, protection of ecological resources andprotection of public health.
(d) Development of restricted use soil cleanup objectives. The protection of: (1) Groundwater soil cleanup objective will be the values calculated for the protection of
groundwater as set forth in appendix E of the Technical Support Document;(2) Ecological resources soil cleanup objectives will be the values calculated for the
protection of ecological resources as set forth in appendix E of the Technical Support Document; and(3) Public health cleanup objective will be the values calculated for the protection of public
health for the identified use of the site, as set forth in appendix E of the Technical Support Document. (e) Modification of soil cleanup objectives. The contaminant-specific soil cleanup objectives setforth at Tables 675-6.8(a) and (b)1 may be modified by site specific data as set forth in this subdivision.
6-15
(1) Contaminant-specific soil cleanup objectives modified in accordance with this subdivisionmay be utilized by the remedial party for a site remedial program undertaken pursuant to:
(i) subpart 375-3 in Tracks 3 or 4, as set forth in paragraphs 375-3.8(e)(3) or (4),respectively; or
(ii) subparts 375-2 and 375-4, as set forth in subparagraph 375-2.8(b)(1)(ii) andsubparagraph 375-4.8(c)(1)(ii).
(2) For the calculation of a protection of groundwater or ecological resources contaminant-specific soil cleanup objective, the site-specific percentage of total organic carbon in the soil at the site may besubstituted in the algorithms provided in appendix E of the Technical Support Document.
(3) For the calculation of a protection of public health contaminant-specific soil cleanupobjective, site-specific data may be used to modify two of the five exposure pathways, as follows:
(i) for the particulate inhalation pathway six parameters rely on site-specific data; and(ii) for the volatile inhalation pathway, four parameters rely on site-specific data.
(4) The algorithms to be used for each protection of public health pathway and details on theparameters which can be substituted are included in appendix E of the Technical Support Document.
(f) Use of soil cleanup objectives developed or modified. Once approved by the Department,contaminant-specific soil cleanup objectives developed or modified as set forth in this section may be utilized bythe Department at other sites consistent with paragraphs (1) and (2) below.
(1) Contaminant-specific soil cleanup objectives developed for contaminants not included inTables 375-6.8(a) and (b), as set forth in subdivision 375-6.9(b) above, will be used as guidance and shall beconsidered by the Department for inclusion in the Tables in this subpart during any subsequent reevaluation ofthe soil cleanup objectives, as set forth by ECL 27-1415.
(2) Contaminant-specific soil cleanup objectives modified for site specific parameters, as setforth in subdivision 375-6.9(e) above, may be utilized at sites manifesting similar parameters, if approved by theDepartment.
TABLE 6
DISPOSAL QUANTITIES AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
Date Trucking Company Truck Number/License Plate Manifest # Disposal Facility Quantity (yds)11/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 2767 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2011/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 2369 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2011/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 2370 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2011/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 2784 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2011/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 2277 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2011/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 2787 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2011/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 2371 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2011/11/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 2783 55 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 2012/12/2013 Sky Materials 39 / 31687 TR 20331 Sky Materials 3612/12/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 16286 Sky Materials 3612/12/2013 Sky Materials 32 / 14172 TC 15336 Sky Materials 3612/12/2013 Sky Materials 40 / 15270 TC 16307 Sky Materials 3612/13/2013 Sky Materials 40 / 15270 TC 16311 Sky Materials 3612/13/2013 Sky Materials 33 / 25246-TR 15423 Sky Materials 3612/16/2013 Sky Materials 38 20139 Sky Materials 3612/16/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 16298 Sky Materials 3612/16/2013 Sky Materials 39 / 31687 TR 20336 Sky Materials 3612/16/2013 Sky Materials 33 / 25246-TR 20055 Sky Materials 3612/16/2013 Sky Materials 40 / 15270 TC 16315 Sky Materials 3612/17/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 10628 Sky Materials 3612/17/2013 Sky Materials 39 / 31687 TR 20340 Sky Materials 3612/18/2013 Sky Materials 39 / 31687 TR 20343 Sky Materials 3612/18/2013 Sky Materials 40 / 15270 TC 16318 Sky Materials 3612/18/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR Sky Materials 3612/19/2013 Sky Materials 40 / 15270 TC 16323 Sky Materials 3612/19/2013 Sky Materials 39 / 31687 TR 20347 Sky Materials 3612/19/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 10637 Sky Materials 3612/20/2013 Sky Materials 40 / 15270 TC 20349 Sky Materials 3612/20/2013 Sky Materials 39 / 31687 TR 20803 Sky Materials 3612/20/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 10641 Sky Materials 3612/20/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118100 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/20/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118101 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/20/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118102 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 10647 Sky Materials 3612/23/2013 Sky Materials 40 / 15270 TC 20808 Sky Materials 3612/23/2013 Sky Materials 38 20154 Sky Materials 3612/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118103 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118104 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118105 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118106 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118107 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118108 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118109 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118110 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118111 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118112 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118113 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/23/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118114 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/24/2015 Sky Materials 37 20872 Sky Materials 3612/24/2013 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 19976 Sky Materials 3612/24/2013 Sky Materials 33 / 25246-TR 20077 Sky Materials 3612/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118115 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118116 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118117 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118118 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118119 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118120 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118121 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118122 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118123 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118124 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 20
Table 6Disposal Qauntities and Facilities
5 West 125th Street, New York, NY
12/26/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118125 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118126 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118127 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118128 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118129 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118130 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118131 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118132 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/27/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118133 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118134 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118135 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118136 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118137 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118138 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118139 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118140 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118141 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118142 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118143 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118144 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118145 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/30/2013 Sky Materials 37 16705 Sky Materials 3612/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118146 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118147 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118148 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118149 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118150 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118151 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Geormari #01 118152 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118153 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118154 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118155 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118156 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118157 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2012/31/2013 Sky Materials 37 Sky Materials 361/6/2014 Sky Materials 41 / 32939 TR 19991 Sky Materials 361/6/2014 Sky Materials 39 / 31687 TR 20310 Sky Materials 36
3/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118158 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118159 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118160 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118161 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118162 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118163 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118164 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118165 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118166 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118167 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/11/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118168 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118169 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118170 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118171 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118172 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118173 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118174 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118175 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118176 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 777 118177 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118178 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118179 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/12/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118180 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118181 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118182 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118183 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118184 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118185 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118186 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118187 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/27/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118188 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 20
3/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118189 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118190 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118191 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118192 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118193 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118194 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118195 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118196 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118197 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 203/28/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118198 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118199 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118200 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118201 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118202 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118203 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC Andrades #3 118204 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 1 / NJ AN-949X 118205 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 7 / NJ AM-115U 118206 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC M. Chiles #3 118207 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 204/2/2014 Jaym Transportation LLC 969 / NJ AN-206Z 118208 Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 20
6/17/2014 Sky Materials Sky Materials 366/19/2014 Sky Materials 45 23599 Sky Materials 206/19/2014 Sky Materials 47 23091 Sky Materials 206/20/2014 Sky Materials 44 19329 Sky Materials 206/20/2014 Sky Materials 46 21664 Sky Materials 207/14/2014 Sky Materials 42 22458 Sky Materials 357/14/2014 Sky Materials 47 21701 Sky Materials 357/14/2014 Sky Materials 43 27216 Sky Materials 357/15/2014 Sky Materials 44 25898 Sky Materials 357/15/2014 Sky Materials 41 22738 Sky Materials 357/15/2014 Sky Materials 46 25946 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 15 8901 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8951 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 57 1506 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 8804 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 5488 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 Sky Materials 48 21998 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 Sky Materials 46 22753 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 Sky Materials 45 25921 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 Sky Materials 43 27175 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 77 270948 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 23 264567 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 Sky Materials 44 19293 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 77 270949 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 23 264544 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8853 Sky Materials 357/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8952 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 8806 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 63 4944 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 Sky Materials 44 19356 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 77 18056 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 23 21012 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 15 8902 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 8805 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 57 1507 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 Sky Materials 125 26678 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8953 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 5489 Sky Materials 357/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8854 Sky Materials 357/18/2014 Sky Materials 44 19359 Sky Materials 357/18/2014 Sky Materials 46 22758 Sky Materials 357/21/2014 Sky Materials 46 25850 Sky Materials 357/21/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 15 8904 Sky Materials 357/21/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 63 4923 Sky Materials 357/21/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8855 Sky Materials 357/21/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 23 21022 Sky Materials 357/21/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 77 186 Sky Materials 357/21/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 8807 Sky Materials 35
7/21/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 57 1508 Sky Materials 357/29/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8856 Sky Materials 357/29/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 72 3541 Sky Materials 357/29/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 98 5463 Sky Materials 357/29/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 1 8857 Sky Materials 357/29/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 72 3542 Sky Materials 357/29/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 15 8906 Sky Materials 357/30/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 77 18080 Sky Materials 357/30/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 8808 Sky Materials 357/30/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 57 1511 Sky Materials 357/30/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 8809 Sky Materials 359/15/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3050 60312 Sky Materials 209/15/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3070 63055 Sky Materials 209/15/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 6 7113 Sky Materials 209/15/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 6 7116 Sky Materials 209/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 6 7117 Sky Materials 209/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. Eagle 1 22186 Sky Materials 209/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3070 62609 Sky Materials 209/16/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3050 60316 Sky Materials 209/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 44 22188 Sky Materials 209/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3070 62611 Sky Materials 209/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3050 60318 Sky Materials 209/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 44 22190 Sky Materials 209/17/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 6 7122 Sky Materials 209/18/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 77 20180 Sky Materials 209/18/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 15 20475 Sky Materials 209/18/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 63 21736 Sky Materials 209/18/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 44 22192 Sky Materials 209/22/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 44 22198 Sky Materials 209/22/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 77 20186 Sky Materials 209/22/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 15 20484 Sky Materials 209/22/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 21367 Sky Materials 209/23/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 15 20487 Sky Materials 209/23/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 3 21373 Sky Materials 209/23/2014 All Suffolk Materials Inc. 57 20255 Sky Materials 20
Total Yardage 597855 Pearl Street - Clean Bank 160
Fresh Kills - Clean Bank 2180Sky Materials 3638
TABLE 7
BACKFILL QUANTITIES AND SOURCES
Date Material Source & Trucking Company Material Ticker No. Quantity (yds)10/11/2013 Sky Materials 3/4 STONE 159962 3612/12/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160442 3612/12/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160441 3612/13/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160450 3612/13/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160451 3612/17/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160463 3612/17/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160464 3612/18/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 20342 3612/18/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160472 3612/19/2013 Sky Materials 3/4 STONE 160491 3612/19/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160492 3612/20/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160502 3612/20/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160504 3612/20/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160505 3612/24/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160537 3612/24/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160538 3612/24/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160539 3612/30/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 16704 3612/30/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160556 3612/31/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE NA 3612/31/2013 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160571 361/6/2014 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160579 361/6/2014 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160580 36
6/19/2014 Sky Materials 57 STONE 160950 36864
Table 7Backfill Quantities and Sources
5 West 125th Street, New York, NY